create a website

Can electricity rebates modify groundwater pumping behaviours? Evidence from a pilot study in Punjab, India. (2021). Balasubramanya, Soumya ; Bouwer, Roy ; Mitra, Archisman.
In: 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas.
RePEc:ags:aaea21:313871.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 15

References cited by this document

Cocites: 30

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Barik, B., Ghosh, S., Sahana, A. S., Pathak, A., & Sekhar, M. (2017). Water–food–energy nexus with changing agricultural scenarios in India during recent decades. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(6), 3041–3060. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3041-2017 Baum, C. F., & Schaffer, M. E. (2012). IVREG2H: Stata module to perform instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments. Statistical Software Components.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2002). IVREG2: Stata module for extended instrumental variables/2SLS and GMM estimation. Statistical Software Components, S425401.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bhattacharyya, R., & Ganguly, A. (2017). Cross subsidy removal in electricity pricing in India.

  4. Cavallo, E., Galiani, S., Noy, I., & Pantano, J. (2013). Catastrophic Natural Disasters and economic growth. MIT Press, 95(5), 1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00413 Central Ground Water Board. (2017). National Compilation on Dynamic Ground Water Resources of India (Issue July). Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India.

  5. Dubash, N. (2007). The electricity-groundwater conundrum: Case for a political solution to a political problem. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(52), 45–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Dubash, N., & Rajan, S. (2001). Power politics: Process of power sector reform in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(35), 3367–3387.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Dube, A., & Zipperer, B. (2015). Pooling Multiple Case Studies Using Synthetic Controls: An Application to Minimum Wage Policies. In IZA Discussion Paper No. 8944.

  8. Economic and Statistical Organisation Government of Punjab. (2020). Punjab Economic Survey 2019-20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Energy Policy, 100, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.024 Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press (ed.)).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Fishman, R., Lall, U., Modi, V., & Parekh, N. (2016). Can electricity pricing save India’s groundwater? Field evidence from a novel policy mechanism in Gujarat. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(4), 819–855. https://doi.org/10.1086/688496 Food Corporation of India. (2020). Procurement Data for Current Marketing Season. https://fci.gov.in/procurements.php?view=87 Galiani, S., & Quistorff, B. (2017). The synth runner package: Utilities to automate synthetic control estimation using synth. Stata Journal, 17(4), 834–849.

  11. Jessoe, K. K., Badiani, R., & Plant, S. (2012). Development and the Environment: The Implications of Agricultural Electricity Subsidies in India. Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442507 Mukherji, A. (2020). Sustainable Groundwater Management in India Needs a Water‐Energy‐ Food Nexus Approach. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13123 Rodell, M., Velicogna, I., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2009). Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature, 460(7258), 999–1002.

  12. Ryan, N., & Sudarshan, A. (2020). Rationing the Commons. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 27473. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27473 Sarkar, A. (2020). Groundwater irrigation and farm power policies in Punjab and West Bengal: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 140, 111437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111437 Sayre, S. S., & Taraz, V. (2019). Groundwater depletion in India: Social losses from costly well deepening. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.002 Shah, T. (2008). Taming the Anarchy: Groundwater Governance in South Asia. John Hopkins University Press.

  13. Shah, T., Giordano, M., & Mukherji, A. (2012). Political economy of the energy-groundwater nexus in India: exploring issues and assessing policy options. Hydrogeology Journal, 20(5), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0816-0 Sidhu, B. S., Kandlikar, M., & Ramankutty, N. (2020). Power tariffs for groundwater irrigation in India: A comparative analysis of the environmental, equity, and economic tradeoffs.

  14. Tripathi, A., & Mishra, A. K. (2016). Impact of Preservation of Subsoil Water Act on Groundwater Depletion : The Case of Punjab, India. Environmental Management, 58(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0693-3 U. A. Amarasinghe, V. Smakhtin, B. R. Sharma, & N. Eriyagama. (2010). Bailout with white revolution or sink deeper?: groundwater depletion and impacts in the Moga District of Punjab, India. IWMI Research Report, 138, 32p. https://doi.org/10.5337/2010.229 World Bank. (2010). Deep wells and prudence : towards pragmatic action for addressing groundwater overexploitation in India. World Bank.

  15. World Development, 128, 104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104836 Singh, K. (2009). Act to save groundwater in Punjab: Its impact on water table, electricity subsidy and environment. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22(Conference), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.57482 Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80–108). Cambridge University Press.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. An Improved Tiered Electricity Pricing Scheme Considering Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction, Cross-Subsidy Handling, and User Demands. (2025). Wu, Yongfei ; Ye, ZE ; Liu, Siqiang.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2610-:d:1658728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Electrical energy costs and size and structure of farming households. Study from Poland. (2025). Piwowar, Arkadiusz.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Electricity price cross-subsidies and enterprises’ green total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from Chinese industrial listed enterprises. (2025). Huang, Zhisheng ; Xie, LI.
    In: Journal of Asian Economics.
    RePEc:eee:asieco:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s104900782400143x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Calculation and optimization of Chinas power distortion under carbon peaking target. (2024). Liu, Zimin ; Wu, Honglei ; Yang, Dan.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:306:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224022618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The socio-economics of the 2023 fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria. (2023). Mesagan, Ekundayo ; Evans, Olaniyi ; Vincent, Olusegun ; Wale-Awe, Olawale ; Nwaogwugwu, Isaac ; Ojapinwa, Taiwo.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:118360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Crossing the cross-subsidy: Evidence from Chinas electricity sector. (2023). Hu, Yingying ; Wu, Wei ; Zhang, Naishan ; Long, Houyin ; Zhou, Dengli.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723001522.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The environmental and economic impacts of phasing out cross-subsidy in electricity prices: Evidence from China. (2023). Yang, Zhiqing ; Liang, Jing.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223025483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Indias just energy transition: Political economy challenges across states and regions. (2023). Jakob, Michael ; Ordonez, Jose Antonio ; Steckel, Jan Christoph ; Ward, Hauke.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:179:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523002069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The effect of retail price regulation on the wholesale price of electricity. (2023). Flores, Daniel ; Castro, Jose E.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:173:y:2023:i:c:s0301421522006279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A comparative analysis of energy subsidy in the MENA region. (2022). Boudekhdekh, Karim.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:115275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A simulation-based optimization model to determine optimal electricity prices under various scenarios considering stakeholders’ objectives. (2022). Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza ; Dehghan, Hamed.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:238:y:2022:i:pc:s0360544221021010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Understanding electricity billing preferences in rural and urban India: Evidence from a conjoint experiment. (2022). Ganesan, Karthik ; Bharadwaj, Kapardhi ; Balani, Kanika ; Urpelainen, Johannes ; Yu, Jason Chun ; Blankenship, Brian.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:106:y:2022:i:c:s0140988321005831.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Economic Impacts of Thailand’s Biofuel Subsidy Reallocation Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model. (2021). Puttanapong, Nattapong ; Piantanakulchai, Mongkut ; Phomsoda, Korrakot.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2272-:d:538408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Perceptions and acceptability of electricity theft: Towards better public service provision. (2021). Ganesan, Karthik ; Bharadwaj, Kapardhi ; Balani, Kanika ; Urpelainen, Johannes ; Yu, Jason Chun ; Blankenship, Brian.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:140:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x20304289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The consumption patterns and determining factors of rural household energy: A case study of Henan Province in China. (2021). Qian, Meng ; Baozhong, Gao ; Zi, Cao.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121004305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The impact of removing cross subsidies in electric power industry in China: Welfare, economy, and CO2 emission. (2021). Lin, Boqiang ; Jia, Zhijie.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:148:y:2021:i:pb:s0301421520307059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Can electricity rebates modify groundwater pumping behaviours? Evidence from a pilot study in Punjab, India. (2021). Balasubramanya, Soumya ; Bouwer, Roy ; Mitra, Archisman.
    In: 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:aaea21:313871.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Evaluation of the reform in the Turkish electricity sector: a CGE analysis. (2020). Akkemik, K. Ali ; Enerdem, Erisa Dautaj.
    In: International Journal of Economic Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:ijoeps:v:14:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s42495-020-00038-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. ПЕРЕКРЕСТНОЕ СУБСИДИРОВАНИЕ КАК МЕРА СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ: МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ОПЫТ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО Ð. (2020). Стародубцева А. Е., .
    In: Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues.
    RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2020:i:2:p:114-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Phasing out Energy Subsidies to Improve Energy Mix: A Dead End. (2020). nugroho, anda ; Komarulzaman, Ahmad ; Irawan, Tony ; Hartono, Djoni.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2281-:d:354221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Modelling a household tariff for reducing sectoral cross-subsidies in the Russian power market. (2020). Proskuryakova, Liliana ; Bianco, Vincenzo ; Starodubtseva, Alena.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:213:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220318338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Indian power distribution sector reforms: A critical review. (2020). Mukherjee, V ; Yadav, Vinod Kumar ; Ghosh, Santosh ; Verma, Mandhir Kumar.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520304018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A review of optimal energy policy instruments on industrial energy efficiency programs, rebound effects, and government policies. (2020). Safarzadeh, Soroush ; Hejazi, Seyed Reza ; Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:139:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520300999.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Is Chinas electricity price cross-subsidy policy reasonable? Comparative analysis of eastern, central, and western regions. (2020). Tan, Zhongfu ; Wang, Xiuhui ; Pu, Lei ; Wu, Jing ; Yang, Jiacheng.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:138:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520300124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Commercial and industrial consumers’ perspectives on electricity pricing reform: Evidence from India. (2019). , Tom ; Sharma, Shruti ; Urpelainen, Johannes.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:162-171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Evolution of sustainable energy policies in India since 1947: A review. (2019). Debnath, Ramit ; Bardhan, Ronita ; Jana, Arnab.
    In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment.
    RePEc:bla:wireae:v:8:y:2019:i:5:n:e340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Testing supply-side climate policies for the global steam coal market—can they curb coal consumption?. (2018). Mendelevitch, Roman.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:150:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-018-2169-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Based Economic Analysis of Solar PV System with Respect to Performance Investigation for Indian Market. (2017). Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K ; Govindarajan, Uma ; Selvi, Sudar Oli.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:820-:d:98846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Are small firms willing to pay for improved power supply? Evidence from a contingent valuation study in India. (2017). Sagebiel, Julian ; Rommel, Jens ; Goyal, Yugank ; Ghosh, Ranjan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:659-665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Evaluation of the reform in the Turkish electricity sector: a CGE analysis. (). Akkemik, K. Ali ; Enerdem, Erisa Dautaj.
    In: International Journal of Economic Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:ijoeps:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s42495-020-00038-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 06:41:33 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.