1. A framework for estimating willingness-to-pay to avoid endogenous environmental risks. (2011). Konishi, Yoshifumi ; Adachi, Kenji .
   In: Resource and Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:resene:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:130-154.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Ahmad, Junaid, B. Goldar, and S. Misra (2005), Value of Arsenic-free Drinking Water to Rural Households in Bangladesh, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 74: 173-185.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Alberini, Anna (1995a), Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 28: 287306.

3. Alberini, Anna (1995b), Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 29: 169-180.

4. Alberini, Anna, B. Kanninen, and R. Carson (1994), Estimating willingness to pay with discrete choice contingent valuation data using error component models, Presented at the AERE session of the ASSA Meetings, Boston 1994.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Burnett Jason K. and Robert W. Hahn (2001), A Costly Benefit: Economic Analysis does not Support EPAs new Arsenic Rule, Regulation, Vol. 24(3): 44-49.

6. Cameron, Trudy A. and John Quiggin (1994), Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 27: 2 18-234.

7. Carson, R., M. Hanemann, and R. Mitchell (1986), Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices. Department of Economic Working Paper, University of California, San Diego.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Carson, Richard T. (1985), Three Essays on Contingent Valuation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Cho, Yongsung, K. William Easter, Laura M.J. McCann, and F. Homans (2005), Are Rural Residents Willing to Pay enough to Improve Drinking Water Quality?, Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 41(3): 729-740.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Cooper, Joseph and John Loomis (1992), Sensitivity of Willingness-to-pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models, Land Economics 68(2): 211-224.

11. Haab, Timothy C. (1998), Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up Questionnaire: A Comment, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 35: 190- 194.

12. Hanemann, M. and B. Kanninen (1999), The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the CVM in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, ed. I. Bateman and K. Willis, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Hanemann, Michael (1985), Some Issues in Continuous- and Discrete-response Contingent Valuation Studies, Northeast Journal ofAgricultural Economics. 5-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Hanemann, Michael, J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen (1991), Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 73: 12551263.

15. Hausman, Ed.), North Holland, Amsterdam. Minnesota Department of Health (2006), Minnesota Drinking Water: A Commitment to Quality, Annual Reports, available at hftp://www,heaith.state.mn. us/divs/eh!water/con dwar/reportO5 .htmi.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Hogue, Cheryl (2001), Arsenic Debate: Its all about Cost, Chemical and Engineering News, Vol. 79(42): 20-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Jordan, J.L. and A. H. Elnagheeb (1993), Willingness to Pay for Improvements in Drinking Water Quality, Water Resources Research, Vol. 29: 23 7-245.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Kim, Hong J. and Yongsung Cho (2002). Estimating Willingness to Pay for Reduced Copper Contamination in Southwestern Minnesota, Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 27(2): 450-463.

19. Maddison, David, R. Catala-Luque, and D. Pearce (2005), Valuing the Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Bangladesh, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 31: 459-476.

20. McFadden D. and G. Leonard (1995), Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis, in Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, (J. A.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Morales, K. H., Joseph G. Ibrahim, C. Chen, and L. M. Ryan (2006), Bayesian Model Averaging with Applications to Benchmark Dose Estimation for Arsenic in Drinking Water, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 101(473): 9-17.

22. National Research Council (2001), Arsenic in Drinking Water 2001 Update, Washington D.C., The National Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, a web-based document dated 2006, available at htt~://www.des,state.nh. us/factsheets/ws/ws-3~2.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Poe, Gregory L. (1993), Information, Risk Perceptions and Contingent Values: The Case of Nitrates in Groundwater, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Rademakers, Lisa (2001), Something in the Water Part II: The Debate about the Watery Arsenic Rule, Environmental Protection, Vol. 12(10): 30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Shultz, S.D. and B.E. Lindsay (1990), The Willingness to Pay for Groundwater Protection, Water Resources Research, Vol. 26: 1869-1875.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. The monitoring records from Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) show that your community water system contains: ______ pg/L of arsenic on average in 2006 and ______ pg/L of arsenic on average during 2000-2005. Please examine the table below to evaluate your lifetime health risk associated with the arsenic levels above.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. U.S. EPA (2000), Arsenic in Drinking Water Rule: Economics Analysis, EPA 815-R-00-026, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. U.S. EPA (2003), Arsenic Treatment Technology Evaluation Handbook for Small Systems, EPA 816-R-03-014, Office of Water.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. U.S. EPA (2006), Point-of-Use or Point-of-Entry Treatment Options for Small Drinking Water Systems, EPA 815-R-06-010, Office of Water.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. U.S. EPA (2007), Cost Evaluation of Point-of-Use and Point-of-Entry Treatment units for Small Systems: Cost Estimating Tool and User Guide, EPA 815-B-07-001, Office of Water.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Umshler, Sue E (1999), When Arsenic is Safer in your Cup of Tea than in your Local Water Treatment Plant, Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 39(3): 565-645.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Walker, Mark, W. D. Shaw, and M. Benson (2006), Arsenic Consumption and Health Risk Perceptions in a Rural Western U.S. Area, Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 42(5): 1363-1370.

34. Wilson, Richard (2001), Underestimating Arsenics Risk: The Latest Science Supports Tighter Standards, Regulation, Vol. 24(3):50-53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Resident Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services in Hillside Forests. (2022). Chen, Wan-Jiun ; Liaw, Shyue-Cherng ; Jan, Jihn-Fa ; Chung, Chih-Hsin.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6193-:d:819469.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Caparros, Alejandro.
   In: Journal of Forest Economics.
   RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:4:p:185-204.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Salt or Sludge? Exploring Preferences for Potable Water Sources. (2014). burton, michael ; Gibson, Fiona.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:57:y:2014:i:3:p:453-476.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Ancillary Benefits of GHG Abatement Policies in Developing Countries: A literature Survey. (2014). Shiqiu, Zhang ; Xie, Xuxuan ; Swanson, Timothy ; Quan, Mu ; Ravetti, Chiara.
   In: IHEID Working Papers.
   RePEc:gii:giihei:ciesrp:cies_rp_26.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Valuing Morbidity from Wildfire Smoke Exposure: A Comparison of Revealed and Stated Preference Techniques. (2013). Loomis, John ; Champ, Patricia A. ; Richardson, Leslie.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:89:y:2013:i:1:p:76-100.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Uncertainty and framing in a valuation task. (2013). Watson, Verity ; Luchini, Stéphane.
   In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
   RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:204-214.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Estimation efficiency of RP/SP models considering SP design and error structures. (2013). Yamamoto, Toshiyuki ; Sanko, Nobuhiro.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:6:y:2013:i:c:p:60-73.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Hypothetical Market Familiarity and the Disconnect Between Stated and Observed Values for Green Energy. (2013). Sims, Charles.
   In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
   RePEc:eco:journ2:2013-01-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. BID IMPRECISION AS A SOURCE OF HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION ESTIMATION: ANALYSIS OF A SURVEY OF RESPONDENT’S ATTITUDES FOR THE BATTLE OF LEXINGTON STATE HISTORIC SITE (SHS). (2012). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher ; Pattiz, B..
   In: Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies.
   RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:12:y2012:i:2_2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Rural Households’ Demand for Frankincense Forest Conservation in Tigray: A Continent Valuation Analysis. (2012). Vranken, Liesbet ; Mathijs, Erik ; Tilahun, Mesfin ; Gebrehiwot, Kindeya ; Gebregziabher, Kidanemariam ; Deckers, Jozef A. ; Bauer, Hans ; Muys, Bart.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:kucawp:146520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. A Method for Improving Welfare Estimates from Multiple-Referendum Surveys. (2012). Petrolia, Daniel ; Interis, Matthew ; Kim, Gwanseon.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:134287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions:Progress and Challenges. (2011). Robinson, Lisa ; Hammitt, James ; Cropper, Maureen.
    In: LERNA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ler:wpaper:24547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. A framework for estimating willingness-to-pay to avoid endogenous environmental risks. (2011). Konishi, Yoshifumi ; Adachi, Kenji .
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:130-154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Design of experiments for bivariate binary responses modelled by Copula functions. (2011). Duffull, S. B. ; Denman, N. G. ; McGree, J. M. ; Eccleston, J. A..
    In: Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:4:p:1509-1520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Municipal solid waste management, source-separated waste and stakeholder’s attitude: a Contingent Valuation Study. (2010). Banerjee, Sarmila ; Sarkhel, Prasenjit.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:12:y:2010:i:5:p:611-630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Contingent Valuation: Past, Present and Future. (2010). Mariel, Petr ; Hoyos, David.
    In: Prague Economic Papers.
    RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2010:y:2010:i:4:id:380:p:329-343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. —Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press. (2009). Jain, Sanjay ; Kannan, P. K. ; Pope, Barbara Kline.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:620-636.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question. Evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice model with heterogeneous anchoring.. (2009). Luchini, Stephane ; Schwarzinger, Michael ; Carrat, Fabrice.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:inserm-00636179.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question: Evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice model with heterogeneous anchoring. (2009). Luchini, Stéphane ; Schwarzinger, Michael ; Carrat, Fabrice.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:873-884.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating Local Welfare Generated by a Professional Sports Team: An Application to the Minnesota Vikings under Threat of Relocation. (2008). Fenn, Aju ; Crooker, John.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umn:wpaper:0805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach. (2008). Martinsson, Peter ; Johansson-Stenman, Olof.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:3:p:739-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Do emotions matter? Coherent preferences under anchoring and emotional effects. (2008). Araña, Jorge ; Araa, Jorge E. ; Leon, Carmelo J..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:66:y:2008:i:4:p:700-711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. (2008). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rose, John.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:118543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Designs Efficiency for Non-market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure It, What to Report and Why. (2007). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rose, John.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:07/21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Transportation and land-use preferences and residents’ neighborhood choices: the sufficiency of compact development in the Atlanta region. (2007). Frank, Lawrence ; Levine, Jonathan.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:34:y:2007:i:2:p:255-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food. (2007). Roosen, Jutta ; Goldberg, Isabell .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:34:y:2007:i:2:p:123-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Cost credibility and the stated preference analysis of public goods. (2007). Flores, Nicholas ; Strong, Aaron.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:29:y:2007:i:3:p:195-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program. (2007). Grijalva, Therese ; Caplan, Arthur ; Bohara, Alok.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2007:i:2:p:433-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Green for green: The perceived value of a quantitative change in the urban tree estate of New Zealand. (2007). Vesely, Eva-Terezia.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:63:y:2007:i:2-3:p:605-615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Can Rural Communities Comply with the New Arsenic Standard for Drinking Water?. (2007). Easter, K. ; Konishi, Yoshifumi ; Cho, Yongsung.
    In: Staff Papers.
    RePEc:ags:umaesp:7353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Is Willingness to Pay for a Public Good Sensitive to the Elicitation Format?. (2006). Bishop, Richard C. ; Champ, Patricia A..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:2:p:162-173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Contingent Valuation. (2006). Carson, Richard T. ; Hanemann, Michael W..
    In: Handbook of Environmental Economics.
    RePEc:eee:envchp:2-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Bid Design and its Influence on the Stated Willingness to Pay in a Contingent Valuation Study. (2006). Calatrava-Requena, Javier ; Carmona-Torres, Carmen.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Bias and Efficiency of Uniform Bid Design in Contingent Valuation. (2006). Kim, Soo-Il .
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Experimental Designs for Environmental Valuation with Choice-Experiments: A Monte-Carlo Investigation. (2005). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Ferrini, Silvia.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:05/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Robustness of VSL Values from Contingent Valuation Surveys. (2005). Alberini, Anna.
    In: NCEE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp200501.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys. (2005). Shaw, Daigee ; Chien, Yu-Lan ; Huang, Cliff J..
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:50:y:2005:i:2:p:362-377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Métodos directos e indirectos en la valoración económica de bienes ambientales, aplicación al valor de uso recreativo del Parque Natural de Somiedo.. (2004). DE LA FUENTE, GARCA L. ; VUELTA, COLINA A..
    In: Estudios de Economia Aplicada.
    RePEc:lrk:eeaart:22_3_18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Robustness of VSL Values from Contingent Valuation Surveys. (2004). Alberini, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2004.135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. (2003). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:4:p:281-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Are Some Lives More Valuable?. (2003). Martinsson, Peter ; Johansson-Stenman, Olof.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Revealed preference valuation compared to contingent valuation: radon‐induced lung cancer prevention. (2002). Kennedy, Christine A..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:11:y:2002:i:7:p:585-598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Testing Bid Design Effects in Multiple-Bounded, Contingent-Valuation Questions. (2002). Boyle, Kevin ; Welsh, Michael ; Roach, Brian.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:1:p:121-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros. Estimating the determinants of individuals willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery. (2001). Eulàlia Dalmau-Matarrodona, .
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:2:p:101-118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Dichotomous choice contingent valuation probability distributions. (2000). Kerr, Geoffrey N..
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:117836.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. THE VALUE OF ADDITIONAL CENTRAL FLYWAY WETLANDS: THE CASE OF NEBRASKAS RAINWATER BASIN WETLANDS. (1999). Poor, Joan P..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30877.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide. (1998). Ibaez, Miguel ; Judez, Lucinio ; Urzainqui, Elvira ; Andres, de Rosario ; Hugalde, Carlos Perez .
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales.
    RePEc:rae:jouces:v:48:y:1998:p:37-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide. (1998). Hugalde, Carlos Perez ; de Andres, Rosario ; Ibaez, Miguel ; Judez, Lucinio ; Urzainqui, Elvira .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01200908.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries. (1998). Whittington, Dale.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:26:y:1998:i:1:p:21-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide. (1998). de Andres, Rosario ; Ibaez, Miguel ; Judez, Lucinio ; Urzainqui, Elvira ; Hugalde, Carlos Perez .
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR).
    RePEc:ags:inrace:206273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 00:17:39 || Missing content? Let us know