create a website

The Rigor Revolution: New Standards of Evidence for Impact Assessment of International Agricultural Research. (2023). Macours, Karen ; Gollin, Douglas ; Stevenson, James R.
In: Annual Review of Resource Economics.
RePEc:anr:reseco:v:15:y:2023:p:495-515.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 97

References cited by this document

Cocites: 60

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Quality seeds, improved varieties: The economics of crop genetic improvement and farmer uptake. (2025). Kramer, Berber ; Spielman, David J.
    In: IFPRI book chapters.
    RePEc:fpr:ifpric:174302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Studying inclusive innovation with the right data: An empirical illustration from Ethiopia. (2024). Mallia, Paola ; Macours, Karen ; Taye, Lemi ; Stevenson, James R ; Kosmowski, Frederic ; Alemu, Solomon.
    In: Agricultural Systems.
    RePEc:eee:agisys:v:219:y:2024:i:c:s0308521x24001380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

    References contributed by 950664_1723490125480

  1. Abay K, Wossen T, Abate GA, Stevenson JR, Michelson H, Barrett CB. 2023. Inferential and behavioral implications of measurement error in agricultural data. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 15:63–83.

  2. Aker JC, Jack K. 2021. Harvesting the rain: the adoption of environmental technologies in the Sahel NBER Work. Pap. 29518.

  3. Alix-Garcia J, Millimet DL 2023. Remotely incorrect? Accounting for nonclassical measurement error in satellite data on deforestation. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Alston JM, Norton G, Pardey PG. 1995. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Andrews I, Kasy M. 2019. Identification of and correction for publication bias. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:82766–94.

  6. Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91:434444–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Aragón FM, Restuccia D, Rud JP. 2022. Assessing misallocation in agriculture: Plots versus farms NBER Work. Pap. 29749.

  8. Baird S, Bohren A, McIntosh C, Özler B. 2018. Optimal designs of experiments in the presence of interference. Rev. Econ. Stat. 100:5844–60 .

  9. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Finkelstein A, Katz LF, Olken BA, Sautmann A. 2020. In praise of moderation: suggestions for the scope and use of preanalysis plans for RCTs in economics NBER Work. Pap. 26993.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Goldberg N, Karlan D, Osei R et al. 2015. A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: evidence from six countries. Science 348:1260799.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Barrett CB, Agrawal A, Coomes OT, Platteau J-P. 2009. Stripe review of social sciences in the CGIAR Work. Pap. CGIAR Sci. Counc. Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Barrett CB, Benton TG, Cooper KA, Fanzo J, Gandhi R et al. 2020. Bundling innovations to transform agrifood systems. Nat. Sustain. 3:12974–76.

  13. Barrett CB, Carter MR. 2010. The power and pitfalls of experiments in development economics: some nonrandom reflections. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 32:515–48.

  14. Barrett CB, Upton JB. 2013. Food security and sociopolitical stability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Security and Sociopolitical Stability CB Barrett 323–56. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.

  15. Barrett CB. 2003. Natural resources management research in CGIAR: a meta-evaluation Themat. Work. Pap. 27799 World Bank Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Beaman L, BenYishay A, Magruder J, Mobarak AM. 2021. Can network theory-based targeting increase technology adoption?. Am. Econ. Rev. 11:61918–43.

  17. Beaman L, Dillon A. 2018. Diffusion of agricultural information within social networks: evidence on gender inequalities from Mali. J. Dev. Econ. 133:147–61.

  18. Beegle K, Carletto C, Himelein K. 2012. Reliability of recall in agricultural data. J. Dev. Econ. 98:134–41.

  19. Behaghel L, Gignoux J, Macours K. 2020. Social learning in agriculture: does smallholder heterogeneity impede technology diffusion in Sub-Saharan Africa? CEPR Discuss. Pap. 15220 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. BenYishay A, Mobarak M. 2018. Social learning and incentives for experimentation and communication. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:3976–1009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Bernard T, Lambert S, Macours K, Vinez M. 2023. Impact of small farmers’ access to improved seeds and deforestation in DR Congo. Nat. Commun. 14:1603.

  22. Bulte E, Beekman G, Di Falco S, Hella J, Lei P. 2014. Behavioral responses and the impact of new agricultural technologies: evidence from a double-blind field experiment in Tanzania. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 96:3813–30.

  23. Calvi R, Penglase J, Tommasi D. 2022. Measuring women's empowerment in collective households. AEA Pap. Proc. 112:566–60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Carletto C, Dillon A, Zezza A. 2021. Agricultural data collection to minimize measurement error and maximize coverage. Handbook of Agricultural Economics CB Barrett, DR Just , Vol. 54407–80. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  25. Carletto C, Gourlay S, Murray S, Zezza A. 2016. Land area measurement in household surveys: Empirical evidence and practical guidance for effective data collection Work. Pap. 147692 LSMS Guidebook, World Bank Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Christensen G, Miguel E 2018. Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. J. Econ. Lit. 56:3920–80.

  27. Corong EL, Hertel TW, McDougall R, Tsigas ME, Van Der Mensbrugghe D. 2017. The standard GTAP model, version 7. J. Glob. Econ. Anal. 2:11–119.

  28. Dalrymple DG. 1978. Development and Spread of High-Yielding Varieties of Wheat and Rice in the Less Developed Nations Foreign Agric. Econ. Rep. 95 Washington, DC: USAID.

  29. Dar M, de Janvry A, Emerick K, Sadoulet E, Wiseman E. 2020. Private input suppliers as information agents for technology adoption in agriculture Work. Pap. AFC India Ltd. Kerala.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. de Janvry A, Dustan A, Sadoulet E. 2011. Recent advances in impact analysis methods for ex-post impact assessments of agricultural technology: options for the CGIAR Rep. Indep. Sci. Partnersh. Counc. Secr. Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. de Janvry A, Sadoulet E, Suri T 2017. Field experiments in developing country agriculture. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments AV Banerjee, E Duflo , Vol. 2427–66. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. De Pinto A, Wiebe K, Pacheco P. 2017. Help bigger palm oil yields to save land. Nature 544:416.

  33. De Weerdt J, Gibson J, Beegle K. 2020. What can we learn from experimenting with survey methods?. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12:431–47.

  34. Deaton A, Cartwright N. 2017. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials NBER Work. Pap. 22595.

  35. Devarajan S, Robinson S. 2002. The influence of computable general equilibrium models on policy. TMD Discuss. Pap. 98 Trade Macroecon. Div., Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Dillon A, Karlan D, Udry C, Zinman J. 2020. Good identification, meet good data. World Dev. 127:104796.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Doss C, Kieran C, Kilic T. 2020. Measuring ownership, control, and use of assets. Fem. Econ. 26:3144–68.

  38. Doss CR. 2006. Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: Limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. Agric. Econ. 34:3207–19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Emerick K, Dar M. 2021. Farmer field days and demonstrator selection for increasing technology adoption. Rev. Econ. Stat. 103:4680–93.

  40. Emerick K, de Janvry A, Sadoulet E, Dar M. 2016. Optimizing social learning about agricultural technology: experiments in India and Bangladesh FERDI Policy Brief 158 Fond. Étud. Rech. Dev. Int. Clermont-Ferrand, Fr.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Erenstein O, Laxmi V. 2008. Zero tillage impacts in India's rice–wheat systems: a review. Soil Tillage Res. 100:1–21–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Fuglie K. 2018. R&D capital, R&D spillovers, and productivity growth in world agriculture. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 40:3421–44.

  43. Fulginiti L. 2010. Estimating Griliches’ k-shifts. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 92:186–101.

  44. Garbero A, Marion P, Brailovskaya V. 2018. The Impact of the Adoption of CGIAR's Improved Varieties on Poverty and Welfare Outcomes: A Systematic Review IFAD Res. Ser. 33 Rome: IFAD.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Gechter M, Meager R. 2022. Combining experimental and observational studies in meta-analysis: a debiasing approach Work. Pap. Penn State Univ./London Sch. Econ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Gollin D, Probst LT, Brower E. 2018. Assessing Poverty Impacts of Agricultural Research: Methods and Challenges for CGIAR Rome: Indep. Sci. Partnersh. Counc.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Gollin D, Udry C. 2021. Heterogeneity, measurement error, and misallocation: evidence from African agriculture. J. Political Econ. 129:1.

  48. Griliches Z. 1957. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25:4501–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Griliches Z. 1958. Research costs and social returns: hybrid corn and related innovations. J. Political Econ. 66:5419–431.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Herdt RW, Mine S. 2017. Does modern technology increase agricultural productivity? Revisiting the evidence from Loevinsohn et al. Tech. Note, Indep. Sci. Partnersh. Counc. Secr. Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Hurley TM, Pardey PG, Rao X, Andrade RS. 2016. Returns to food and agricultural R&D investments worldwide, 1958–2015 Brief., InSTePP St. Paul, MN.

  52. Imbens G. 2018. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials: a commentary on Deaton and Cartwright. Soc. Sci. Med. 210:50–52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Jaleta M, Tesfaye K, Kilian A, Yirga C, Habte E et al. 2020. Misidentification by farmers of the crop varieties they grow: lessons from DNA fingerprinting of wheat in Ethiopia. PLOS ONE 15:7e0235484.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Jayachandran S, Biradavolu M, Cooper J. 2023. Using machine learning and qualitative interviews to design a five-question women's agency index. World Dev. 161:106076.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Jayachandran S, De Laat J, Lambin EF, Stanton CY, Audy R, Thomas NE 2017. Cash for carbon: a randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation. Science 357:267–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Kilic T, Sohnesen T. 2015. Same question but different answer: experimental evidence on questionnaire design's impact on poverty measured by proxies Policy Res. Work. Pap. 7182. World Bank Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Kosmowski F, Alemu S, Mallia P, Stevenson J, Macours K. 2020. Shining a brighter light: Comprehensive evidence on adoption and diffusion of CGIAR-related innovations in Ethiopia Synth. Rep. Stand. Panel Impact Assess. Rome, It.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Kosmowski F, Aragaw A, Kilian A, Ambel A, Ilukor J et al. 2019. Varietal identification in household surveys: results from three household-based methods against the benchmark of DNA fingerprinting in southern Ethiopia. Exp. Agric. 55:3371–85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Kosmowski F, Stevenson J, Campbell J, Ambel A, Tsegay AH. 2017. On the ground or in the air? A methodological experiment on crop residue cover measurement in Ethiopia. Environ. Manag. 60:705–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Laajaj R, Macours K, Masso C, Thuita M, Vanlauwe B. 2020. Reconciling yield gains in agronomic trials with returns under African smallholder conditions. Sci. Rep. 10:114286.

  61. Laajaj R, Macours K. 2016. Learning-by-doing and learning-from-others: evidence from agronomical trials in Kenya Policy Brief, Fond. Étud. Rech. Dev. Int. Clermont-Ferrand, Fr.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Laajaj R, Macours K. 2021. Measuring skills in developing countries. J. Hum. Resour. 56:41254–95.

  63. Laborde D, Robichaud V, Tokgoz S. 2013. MIRAGRODEP 1.0: documentation Tech. Note, AGRODEP Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Loevinsohn M, Sumberg J, Diagne A, Whitfield S. 2013. Under what circumstances and conditions does adoption of technology result in increased agricultural productivity? Rep. Inst. Dev. Stud. Brighton, UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. MacAskill W. 2015. Doing Good Better: How Effective Altruism Can Help You Help Others, Do Work That Matters, and Make Smarter Choices About Giving Back New York: Penguin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Macours K. 2019. Farmers’ demand and the traits and diffusion of agricultural innovations in developing countries. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 11:483–99.

  67. Magnan N, Spielman DJ, Lybbert TJ, Gulati K. 2015. Leveling with friends: social networks and Indian farmers’ demand for a technology with heterogeneous benefits. J. Dev. Econ. 116:223–51.

  68. Mallia P. 2022. You reap what (you think) you sow? Evidence on farmers’ behavioral adjustments in the case of correct crop varietal identification Work. Pap. 2022-08 Paris Sch. Econ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Maredia M, Reyes B, Manu-Aduening J, Dankyi A, Hamazakaza P et al. 2016. Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia. Food Secur. Int. Dev. Work. Pap. 149 Mich. State. Univ. East Lansing.

  70. Mason-D'Croz D, Bogard JR, Herrero M, Robinson S, Sulser T et al. 2020. Modelling the global economic consequences of a major African swine fever outbreak in China. Nat. Food 1:4221–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Meenakshi JV, Johnson N, Karasalo M. 2021. Designing quasi-experimental impact studies of agricultural research at scale Tech. Note 10 Stand. Panel Impact Assess. Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Oakes JM. 2018. The tribulations of trials: a commentary on Deaton and Cartwright. Soc. Sci. Med. 210:57–59.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Olken B. 2015. Promises and perils of pre-analysis plans. J. Econ. Perspect. 29:361–80.

  74. Parker SW, Todd PE. 2017. Conditional cash transfers: the case of Progresa/Oportunidades. J. Econ. Lit. 55:3866–915.

  75. Pingali P. 2012. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. PNAS 109:3112302–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Poets A, Silverstein K, Pardey P, Hearne S, Stevenson J. 2020. DNA Fingerprinting for Crop Varietal Identification: Fit-for-Purpose Protocols, Their Costs and Analytical Implications Rome: SPIA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Pritchett L. 2002. It pays to be ignorant: a simple political economy of rigorous program evaluation. J. Policy Reform 5:251–69.

  78. Quisumbing AR, Ahmed A, Gilligan DO, Hoddinott J, Kumar N et al. 2020. Randomized controlled trials of multi-sectoral programs: lessons from development research. World Dev. 127:104822.

  79. Quisumbing AR, Sproule K, Martinez EM, Malapit H. 2021. Do tradeoffs among dimensions of women's empowerment and nutrition outcomes exist? Evidence from six countries in Africa and Asia. Food Policy 100:102001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Raitzer DA, Kelley TG. 2008. Assessing the contribution of impact assessment to donor decisions for international agricultural research. Res. Eval. 17:187–99 .

  81. Rao X, Hurley TM, Pardey PG. 2020. Recalibrating the reported returns to agricultural R&D: What if we all heeded Griliches?. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 64:3977–1001.

  82. Renkow M, Byerlee D. 2010. The impacts of CGIAR research: a review of recent evidence. Food Policy 35:5391–402.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Robinson S, Mason-D'Croz D, Islam S, Sulser T, Robertson RD et al. 2015. The international model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities and trade (IMPACT): model description for version 3 IFPRI Discuss. Pap. 1483 Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Rosenzweig MR, Udry C. 2020. External validity in a stochastic world: evidence from low-income countries. Rev. Econ. Stud. 87:1343–81.

  85. Savedoff WD, Levine R, Birdsall N. 2006. When will we ever learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation Rep. Cent. Glob. Dev. Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Skoufias E. 2005. PROGRESA and its impacts on the welfare of rural households in Mexico Res. Rep. 139 Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Stern E, Stame N, Mayne J, Forss K, Davies R, Befani B. 2012. Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations: report of a study commissioned by the Department for International Development Rep. 38 Dep. Int. Dev. London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Stevenson J, Gantier M, Traxler G, Kosmowski F, Macours K. 2023. The challenge of tracking the reach of post-green revolution crop breeding. Preprint CGIAR Standing Panel on Impact Assessment Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Stevenson J, Vanlauwe B, Macours K, Johnson N, Krishnan L et al. 2019. Farmer adoption of plot-and farm-level natural resource management practices: between rhetoric and reality. Glob. Food Secur. 20:101–4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Stevenson J, Vlek P. 2018. Assessing the adoption and diffusion of sustainable agricultural practices: synthesis of a new set of empirical studies Rep. Stand. Panel Impact Assess. Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Stewart R, Langer L, Rebelo da Silva N, Muchiri E, Zaranika H et al. 2015. The effects of training, innovation and new technology on African smallholder farmers’ economic outcomes and food security: a systematic review. Campbell Syst. Rev. 11:1–224.

  92. Valenzuela E, Hertel TW, Keeney R, Reimer JJ. 2007. Assessing global computable general equilibrium model validity using agricultural price volatility. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89:2383–97.

  93. Walker TS, Crissman CC. 1996. Case studies of the economic impact of CIP related technologies Rep. Int. Potato Cent. Lima, Peru.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Walker TS, Maredia M, Kelley T, La Rovere R, Templeton D et al. 2008. Strategic guidance for ex post impact assessment of agricultural research Rep. CGIAR Sci. Counc. Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. White H. 2009. Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice. J. Dev. Effect. 1:3271–84.

  96. Wiebe K, Sulser TB, Dunston S, Rosegrant MW, Fuglie K et al. 2021. Modeling impacts of faster productivity growth to inform the CGIAR initiative on Crops to End Hunger. PLOS ONE 16:4e0249994.

  97. Wossen T, Girma G, Abdoulaye T, Rabbi I, Olanrewaju A, Alene A et al. 2017. The cassava monitoring survey in Nigeria Rep. Int. Inst. Trop. Agric. Ibadan, Niger.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Who carries the burden of climate change? Heterogeneous impact of droughts in sub‐Saharan Africa. (2025). Pignède, Edouard ; Pignde, Edouard.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:107:y:2025:i:3:p:925-957.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Missing Parcels and Farm Size Measurement Error: Do Nationally Representative Surveys Provide Reliable Estimates?. (2025). Holden, Stein ; Tione, Sarah ; Makate, Clifton.
    In: CLTS Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2025_004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Greening for the greater good: Socio-economic impacts of land restoration in the Great Green Wall. (2024). Petracco, Carly ; Sitko, Nicholas ; Valli, Elsa ; De, Ana Paula.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924002088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The seeds of misallocation: Fertilizer use and maize varietal misidentification in Ethiopia. (2024). Gollin, Douglas ; Kosmowski, Frdric ; Deisemann, Tim ; Bohr, Nils ; Lybbert, Travis J.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:171:y:2024:i:c:s0304387824000981.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A Metadata Schema for Data from Experiments in the Social Sciences. (2023). Sautmann, Anja ; Kopper, Sarah ; Cavanagh, Jack ; Fliegner, Jasmin Claire.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Money (Not) to Burn: Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Crop Residue Burning. (2023). Jayachandran, Seema ; Pande, Rohini ; Kala, Namrata ; Jack, Kelsey B.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pri:cepsud:307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Relationship between High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration and Regional Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Investigation in China. (2023). Hu, Weina ; Ban, QI ; Sun, Lei ; Ge, Lanqing ; Li, Chunyan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16545-:d:1293944.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Reducing information barriers to solar adoption: Experimental evidence from India. (2023). Yamano, Takashi ; Meeks, Robyn ; Mahadevan, Meera.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323000981.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Rigor Revolution: New Standards of Evidence for Impact Assessment of International Agricultural Research. (2023). Macours, Karen ; Gollin, Douglas ; Stevenson, James R.
    In: Annual Review of Resource Economics.
    RePEc:anr:reseco:v:15:y:2023:p:495-515.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. PROTOCOL: School‐based language, math, and reading interventions for executive functions in children and adolescents: A systematic review. (2022). Dietrichson, Jens ; Strandby, Martin Williams ; Seerup, Julie Kaas ; Bengtsen, Elizabeth ; Arleth, Bjorn Christian ; Thomsen, Morten Kjar.
    In: Campbell Systematic Reviews.
    RePEc:wly:camsys:v:18:y:2022:i:3:n:e1262.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Landscape-scale effects of farmers’ restoration decision making and investments in central Malawi: an agent-based modeling approach. (2022). Zulu, Leo C ; Ligmann-Zielinska, Arika.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:115672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Is there an energy efficiency gap in China? Evidence from an information experiment. (2022). La Nauze, Andrea ; Ding, Iza ; Beattie, Graham.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:115:y:2022:i:c:s0095069622000730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Estimates of the social cost of carbon have increased over time. (2022). Tol, Richard.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2105.03656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Do Corporate Tax Cuts Boost Economic Growth?. (2021). Heimberger, Philipp ; Gechert, Sebastian.
    In: wiiw Working Papers.
    RePEc:wii:wpaper:201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Estimates of the social cost of carbon have not changed over time. (2021). Tol, Richard.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sus:susewp:0821.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The effects of offshoring on wages: a meta-analysis. (2021). Neves, Pedro Cunha ; Afonso, Oscar ; Cardoso, Matilde ; Sochirca, Elena.
    In: Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv).
    RePEc:spr:weltar:v:157:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10290-020-00385-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Monopsony in Labor Markets: A Meta-Analysis. (2021). Sokolova, Anna ; Sorensen, Todd.
    In: ILR Review.
    RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:1:p:27-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Myth or Measurement: What Does the New Minimum Wage Research Say about Minimum Wages and Job Loss in the United States?. (2021). Neumark, David ; Shirley, Peter.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Does economic globalization affect government spending? A meta-analysis. (2021). Heimberger, Philipp.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:187:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-020-00784-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Systematic Variation in Waste Site Effects on Residential Property Values: A Meta-Regression Analysis and Benefit Transfer. (2021). Schutt, Marvin.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:78:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-021-00536-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth?. (2021). Heimberger, Philipp ; Gechert, Sebastian.
    In: IMK Working Paper.
    RePEc:imk:wpaper:210-2021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Bank Survival Around the World A Meta‐Analytic Review. (2021). Kočenda, Evžen ; Iwasaki, Ichiro ; Koenda, Even.
    In: CEI Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hit:hitcei:2021-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Health, air pollution and animal agriculture. (2021). TREICH, Nicolas ; Lavaine, Emmanuelle ; Majerus, Philippe.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03095288.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A Bayesian Approach to Measurement of Backtest Overfitting. (2021). Witzany, Jiří.
    In: Risks.
    RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:18-:d:476849.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The elusive employment effect of the minimum wage. (2021). Manning, Alan.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:107415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Does FDI promote entrepreneurial activities? A meta-analysis. (2021). Reed, W. ; Wu, Tingting ; Hong, Sanghyun ; Chen, Gen ; Tian, Bifei.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:142:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21000486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How puzzling is the forward premium puzzle? A meta-analysis. (2021). Zigraiova, Diana ; Novak, Jiri ; Irsova, Zuzana ; Havranek, Tomas.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:134:y:2021:i:c:s0014292121000672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Are the effects of minimum wage on the labour market the same across countries? A meta-analysis spanning a century. (2021). Martinez, Monica Jimenez.
    In: Economic Systems.
    RePEc:eee:ecosys:v:45:y:2021:i:1:s0939362520301679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does FDI Promote Entrepreneurial Activities? A Meta-Analysis. (2021). Reed, W. ; Wu, Tingting ; Hong, Sanghyun ; Chen, Gen ; Tian, Bifei.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:21/03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Health, air pollution and animal agriculture. (2020). TREICH, Nicolas ; Lavaine, Emmanuelle ; Majerus, Philippe.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:124874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Health, air pollution, and animal agriculture. (2020). TREICH, Nicolas ; Lavaine, Emmanuelle ; Majerus, Philippe.
    In: Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
    RePEc:spr:roafes:v:101:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s41130-020-00124-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. In Praise of Moderation: Suggestions for the Scope and Use of Pre-Analysis Plans for RCTs in Economics. (2020). Sautmann, Anja ; Olken, Benjamin ; Katz, Lawrence ; Finkelstein, Amy ; Duflo, Esther ; Banerjee, Abhijit.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Bias and Careers: Evidence from the Aid Effectiveness Literature. (2020). Zigova, Katarina ; Doucouliagos, Chris ; Hinz, Thomas.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Effects of Macroprudential Policy: Evidence from Over 6,000 Estimates. (2020). Yao, Weijia ; Patnam, Manasa ; Araujo, Juliana Dutra ; Valencia, Fabian ; Popescu, Adina.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2020/067.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Publication and Identification Biases in Measuring the Intertemporal Substitution of Labor Supply. (2020). Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas ; Elminejad, Ali.
    In: Working Papers IES.
    RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2020_32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Remittances and economic growth: A meta-analysis. (2020). Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas ; Cazachevici, Alina.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:134:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x20301479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Classroom experiments as a replication device. (2020). So, Tony.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:86:y:2020:i:c:s2214804319303866.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. What do we know about R&D spillovers and productivity? Meta-analysis evidence on heterogeneity and statistical power. (2020). Ugur, Mehmet ; Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa ; Luong, Hoang M.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:1:s0048733319301854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The impact of information-based interventions on conservation behavior: A meta-analysis. (2020). Nemati, Mehdi ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0928765518303828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias. (2020). Schwarz, Jiří ; Irsova, Zuzana ; Havranek, Tomas ; Bajzik, Josef.
    In: Journal of International Economics.
    RePEc:eee:inecon:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0022199620300982.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Are patient-regarding preferences stable? Evidence from a laboratory experiment with physicians and medical students from different countries. (2020). Iversen, Tor ; Hennig-Schmidt, Heike ; Godager, Geir ; Wang, Jian.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:125:y:2020:i:c:s001429212030043x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Reusing Natural Experiments. (2020). Ringgenberg, Matthew ; Heath, Davidson ; Samadi, Mehrdad ; Werner, Ingrid M.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:14710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Nudging for Tax Compliance: A Meta-Analysis. (2020). Asatryan, Zareh ; Antinyan, Armenak.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Does FDI Promote Entrepreneurial Activities? A Meta-Analysis. (2020). Reed, W. ; Wu, Tingting ; Hong, Sanghyun ; Chen, Gen ; Tian, Bifei.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:20/20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Using Monte Carlo Experiments to Select Meta-Analytic Estimators. (2020). Reed, W. ; Hong, Sanghyun.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:20/10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta‐analyses. (2020). Vanderweele, Tyler J ; Mathur, Maya B.
    In: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C.
    RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:5:p:1091-1119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. New statistical metrics for multisite replication projects. (2020). Vanderweele, Tyler J ; Mathur, Maya B.
    In: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A.
    RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:1145-1166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. REPORTING GUIDELINES FOR META‐ANALYSIS IN ECONOMICS. (2020). Stanley, T. ; Reed, W. ; Iwasaki, Ichiro ; Havranek, Tomas ; Geyer-Klingeberg, Jerome ; Doucouliagos, Chris ; Bom, Pedro ; R. C. M. van Aert, ; Rost, Katja ; Geyerklingeberg, Jerome.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:34:y:2020:i:3:p:469-475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Methods Matter: p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics. (2020). heyes, anthony ; Cook, Nikolai ; Brodeur, Abel.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:110:y:2020:i:11:p:3634-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Nudging for tax compliance: A meta-analysis. (2019). Asatryan, Zareh ; Antinyan, Armenak.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:19055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Remittances and Economic Growth: A Quantitative Survey. (2019). Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas ; Cazachevici, Alina.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:205812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Remittances and Economic Growth: A Quantitative Survey. (2019). Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas ; Cazachevici, Alina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:96823.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias: Comment. (2019). Johannesson, Magnus ; Stromland, Eirik ; Kvarven, Amanda.
    In: MetaArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:metaar:dh87m.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Practical Significance, Meta-Analysis and the Credibility of Economics. (2019). Stanley, T. ; Doucouliagos, Chris.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. What do we know about R&D spillovers and productivity? Meta-analysis evidence on heterogeneity and statistical power. (2019). Ugur, Mehmet ; Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa ; Luong, Hoang M.
    In: Greenwich Papers in Political Economy.
    RePEc:gpe:wpaper:25423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Beeinflusst die ökonomische Globalisierung die Einkommensungleichheit? Eine Meta-Analyse. (2019). Heimberger, Philipp.
    In: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG.
    RePEc:clr:wugarc:y:2019v:45i:4p:497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Towards an Experimental Framework for Assessing Meta-Analysis Methods, with a Focus on Andrews-Kasy Estimators. (2019). Reed, W. ; Hong, Sanghyun.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:19/13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Another Look at “Bank Competition and Financial Stability: Much Ado about Nothing?”. (2019). Reed, W. ; Das, Kuntal ; Bandaranayake, Samangi.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:19/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Does FDI Promote Entrepreneurial Activities? A Meta-Analysis. (2019). Reed, W. ; Wu, Tingting ; Hong, Sanghyun ; Chen, Gen ; Tian, Bifei.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:19/06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  60. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 16:54:46 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.