This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L. and Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101: 695-723.

2. Aczél, J. and Luce, D. R. (2007). A behavioral condition for Prelec’s weighting function on the positive line without assuming W(1)=1. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51: 126-29.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Aldashev, G., Carletti, T. and Righi, S. (2011). Follies subdued: Informational efficiency under adaptive expectations and confirmatory bias. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80: 110-21.

4. Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de lhomme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de lécole Américaine. Econometrica, 21: 503–46.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. American Economic Review, 95: 897-901. Hey, J. and Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data.

6. Andreoni, J. and Sprenger, C. (2012). Risk preferences are not time preferences. American Economic Review, 102: 3357-76.

7. Arnold, L., Crauel, H. and Wihstutz, V. (1983). Stabilization of linear systems by noise. SIAM J. Control Optim, 21: 451–461.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Baccelli, J. (2024). Ordinal utility differences. Social Choice and Welfare, 62(2,3): 275-87.

9. Baltussen, G., Post, T., van den Assem, M. J. and Wakker, P. P. (2012). Random incentive systems in a dynamic choice experiment. Experimental Economics, 15: 418–43.

10. Beattie, J. and Loomes, G. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14: 155–68.

11. Bruhin, A., Fehr-Duda, H. and Epper, T. (2010). Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion. Econometrica, 78: 1375-412.

12. Butler, D. and Loomes, G. (2007). Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 97: 277-97.

13. Chay, K., McEwan, P. and Urquiola, M. (2005). The central role of noise in evaluating interventions that use test scores to rank schools. American Economic Review, 95: 1237-58.

14. Cho, Y. and Luce, D. R. (1995). Tests of hypotheses about certainty equivalents and joint receipt of gambles.

15. Econometrica, 62: 1291-326. Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76: 508–15.

16. Fehr, E. and Falk, A. (2002). Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review, 46: 687-724.

17. Forms for the weighting function. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51: 29–44. Thaler, R. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, Present, and Future. Am. Econ. Rev., , 106: 1577–600.

18. Gaudecker von, Hans-Martin, Arthur van Soest and Erik Wengstrom (2011). ―Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. American Economic Review, 101: 664-94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Halevy, Y. (2008). Strotz meets allais: diminishing impatience and the certainty effect. The American Economic Review, 98: 1145-62.

20. Harin, А. (2012b). ―Data dispersion in economics (II) – Inevitability and Consequences of Restrictions. Review of Economics & Finance, 2(3): 24-36.

21. Harin, А. (2014). The random-lottery incentive system. Can p~1 experiments deductions be correct?‖ 16th conference on the Foundations of Utility and Risk, Rotterdam, 2014. See also: Harin, А., ―Problems of utility and prospect theories. A ‖certain-uncertain‖ inconsistency of the random-lottery incentive system.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Harin, А. (2022). Forbidden zones for the expectations of data: new mathematical methods and models for behavioral economics. Academic Journal of Applied Mathematical Sciences, 8: 12-26.

23. Harrison, G. W., Johnson, E., Mcinnes, M. and Rutström, E. (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: Comment.

24. International Journal of Economics and Financial Research 27 Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92: 164455.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20: 221-34.

26. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 26391.

27. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 193-206.

28. Kumar, D. and Goyal, N. (2015). Behavioural biases in investment decision making – a systematic literature review.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Lee, J. (2008). The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36: 19–41.

30. Loewenstein, G. and Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies. Intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3: 181–93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Madansky, A. (1959). Bounds on the expectation of a convex function of a multivariate random variable. Ann. Math.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Meier, S. and Sprenger, C. (2010). Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2: 193–210.

33. MPRA Paper: Available: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55706/1/MPRA_paper_55706.pdf Harin, А. (2018). Forbidden zones for the expectation. New mathematical results for behavioral and social sciences.

34. MPRA Paper: Available: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86650/1/MPRA_paper_86650.pdf Harin, А. (2020). Macroscopic analogs of quantum-mechanical phenomena and auto-transformations of PDFs,‖ The 5th international conference on stochastic methods (icsm-5). Track b. Applications of stochastic methods.

35. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64: 229–48. Correa, M., Gonzalez-Sabate, L. and Serrano, I. (2013). Home bias effect in the management literature.

36. Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66: 497-527.

37. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7: 88–108. Larkin, I. and Leider, S. (2012). Incentive schem+es, sorting, and behavioral biases of employees: Experimental evidence. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4: 184-214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Schoemaker, P. and Hershey, J. (1992). Utility measurement: Signal, noise, and bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52: 397-424.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Scientometrics, 95: 417–33. Cox, J. C. and Epstein, S. (1989). Preference reversals without the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 79: 408–26.

40. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 332-82.

41. Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991). Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. American Economic Review, 81: 971–78.

42. Stat., 30: 743–46. McCord, M. and de Neufville, R. (1986). Lottery equivalents: Reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Management Science, 32: 56-60.

43. Steingrimsson, R. and Luce, R. D. (2007). Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: IV.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Tversky, A. and Thaler, R. H. (1990). Anomalies: Preference reversals. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4: 201-11.

45. Vossler, C. A., Doyon, M. and Rondeau, D. (2012). Truth in consequentiality: Theory and eield evidence on discrete choice experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4: 145-71.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Eliciting ambiguity with mixing bets. (2024). Schmidt, Patrick.
   In: Papers.
   RePEc:arx:papers:1902.07447.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Incoherent Preferences. (2021). Charles-Cadogan, G.
   In: CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series.
   RePEc:wrk:wcreta:69.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Characterizing ambiguity attitudes using model uncertainty. (2020). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03031502.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Contracting Probability Distortions. (2019). Gonzalez-Jimenez, Victor H.
   In: Vienna Economics Papers.
   RePEc:vie:viennp:1901.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Social Status and Risk-Taking in Investment Decisions. (2019). Weitzel, Utz ; Rosenkranz, Stephanie ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
   In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
   RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2019_07.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Risk preferences and development revisited. (2019). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Martinsson, Peter ; Nam, Pham Khanh ; Truong, Nghi.
   In: Theory and Decision.
   RePEc:kap:theord:v:86:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-018-9674-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Measuring ambiguity preferences: A new ambiguity preference survey module. (2019). Schröder, David ; Cavatorta, Elisa ; Schroder, David.
   In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
   RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:58:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-019-09299-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Trust as a decision under ambiguity. (2019). Wakker, Peter ; Turmunkh, Uyanga ; Li, Chen.
   In: Experimental Economics.
   RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9582-3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Social Motives and Risk-Taking in Investment Decisions. (2019). Weitzel, Utz ; Rosenkranz, Stephanie ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:inn:wpaper:2019-07.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain. (2019). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Kuilen, Gijs ; Attema, Arthur ; Lharidon, Olivier ; van De, Gijs.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:64:y:2019:i:c:p:15-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Testing constant absolute and relative ambiguity aversion. (2019). Baillon, Aurelien ; Placido, Latitia.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:309-332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Ambiguous persuasion. (2019). Li, Ming ; Beauchene, Dorian.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:179:y:2019:i:c:p:312-365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Measuring time and risk preferences in an integrated framework. (2019). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Kemel, Emmanuel ; Panin, Amma.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:115:y:2019:i:c:p:459-469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Ambiguity Attitudes about Investments: Evidence from the Field. (2019). Peijnenburg, Kim ; Mitchell, Olivia ; Kouwenberg, Roy ; Anantanasuwong, Kanin.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13518.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The Missing Link: Unifying Risk Taking and Time Discounting. (2018). Epper, Thomas ; Fehr-Duda, Helga.
    In: Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:usg:econwp:2018:12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Delegated Decision Making and Social Competition in the Finance Industry. (2018). Weitzel, Utz ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2018_08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The strength of sensitivity to ambiguity. (2018). Mukerji, Sujoy ; Kuilen, Gijs ; Cubitt, Robin.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:85:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-018-9657-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The role of information search and its influence on risk preferences. (2018). Kopsacheilis, Orestis.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:84:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9623-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Delegated Investment Decisions and Rankings. (2018). Weitzel, Utz ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2018-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Rankings and Risk-Taking in the Finance Industry. (2018). Weitzel, Utz ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2016-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Sources of Uncertainty and Subjective Prices. (2018). Minardi, Stefania ; Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Battigalli, Pierpaolo ; Cappelli, V ; Maccheroni, F.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Three layers of uncertainty: an experiment. (2018). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc ; Liu, Ning ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Three Layers of Uncertainty: an Experiment. (2018). Bosetti, Valentina ; Liu, Ning ; Berger, Loc ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2018.24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Probability interference in expected utility theory. (2018). Charles-Cadogan, G.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:163-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Asset pricing and ambiguity: Empirical evidence⁎. (2018). Izhakian, Yehuda ; Brenner, Menachem.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:130:y:2018:i:3:p:503-531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Expectation formation in an evolving game of uncertainty: New experimental evidence. (2018). Schaffner, Markus ; Frijters, Paul ; Foster, Gigi ; Torgler, Benno.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:154:y:2018:i:c:p:379-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Accounting for ambiguity and trust in partial outsourcing: A behavioral real options perspective. (2018). Gao, Yongling ; Driouchi, Tarik.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:93-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Do sellers exploit biased beliefs of buyers? An experiment. (2018). Wenner, Lukas M.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:110:y:2018:i:c:p:194-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Contracting under uncertainty: A principal–agent model with ambiguity averse parties. (2018). Quiggin, John ; Grant, Simon ; Kline, Jude J.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:582-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Quantum Decision Theory and the Ellsberg Paradox. (2018). Dhami, Sanjit ; Wei, Mengxing ; Al-Nowaihi, Ali.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. ASSIMILATION IN THE RISK PREFERENCES OF SPOUSES. (2018). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Di Falco, Salvatore.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:1809-1816.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Allais, Ellsberg, and preferences for hedging. (2017). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Dean, Mark.
    In: Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:the:publsh:1960.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence. (2017). Calford, Evan.
    In: Purdue University Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:pur:prukra:1291.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment. (2017). Laszlo, Sonia ; Engle-Warnick, Jim.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:55:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-017-9264-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Signaling Probabilities in Ambiguity: on the impact of vague news. (2017). Vinogradov, Dmitri ; Makhlouf, Yousef.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gla:glaewp:2017_12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. To mitigate or not to mitigate: The price elasticity of pro-environmental behavior. (2017). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:84:y:2017:i:c:p:209-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Ambiguous Correlation. (2017). Halevy, Yoram ; Epstein, Larry.
    In: Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2017-006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. The Rich Domain of Ambiguity Explored. (2016). Wakker, Peter ; Müller, Julia ; Muller, Julia ; Li, Zhihua ; Wang, Tong V.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145734.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Ambiguity Attitudes in a Large Representative Sample. (2016). Wakker, Peter ; Kouwenberg, Roy ; Dimmock, Stephen.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:62:y:2016:i:5:p:1363-1380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. RISK TAKING FOR ONESELF AND OTHERS: A STRUCTURAL MODEL APPROACH. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Villegas-Palacio, Clara ; Martinsson, Peter ; Mejia, Milagros .
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:54:y:2016:i:2:p:879-894.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. PROBABILISTIC SOPHISTICATION, SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY, AND COGNITIVE ABILITY: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE. (2016). Almeida, Sergio ; Rangel, Marcos.
    In: Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2014:131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Piecewise Additivity for Nonexpected Utility. (2015). Webb, Craig.
    In: Economics Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:man:sespap:1503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Purely subjective extended Bayesian models with Knightian unambiguity. (2015). Qu, Xiangyu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:79:y:2015:i:4:p:547-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Measuring Ambiguity Preferences. (2014). Schröder, David ; Cavatorta, Elisa ; Schroder, David.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Multiple-item risk measures. (2014). Sakha, Sahra ; Menkhoff, Lukas.
    In: Kiel Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1980.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Behavioral determinants of home bias - theory and experiment. (2014). Dlugosch, Dennis ; Wang, Mei ; Horn, Kristian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2014-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. A Test of Mechanical Ambiguity. (2014). Oechssler, Jörg ; Roomets, Alex.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Ambiguity Aversion with Three or More Outcomes. (2014). Machina, Mark.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:104:y:2014:i:12:p:3814-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Risk preferences and development revisited: A field experiment in Vietnam. (2013). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Martinsson, Peter ; Truong, Nghi ; Nam, Pham Khanh.
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2013403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Risk Aversion and Religion. (2012). Vellekoop, Nathanaël ; Trautmann, Stefan ; Noussair, Charles ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van de Kuilen, G..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:b611b08c-0053-41df-82aa-c3724036c8ae.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-29 23:02:16 || Missing content? Let us know