1. Latent class choice models with an error structure: Investigating potential unobserved associations between latent segmentation and behavior generation. (2024). Mokhtarian, Patricia ; Kim, Sung Hoo.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:53:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000514.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Robust discrete choice models with t-distributed kernel errors. (2022). Gasos, Thomas ; Krueger, Rico ; Bansal, Prateek ; Bierlaire, Michel.
   In: Papers.
   RePEc:arx:papers:2009.06383.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Robustness of Student link function in multinomial choice models. (2020). Peyhardi, Jean.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03227808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Robustness of Student link function in multinomial choice models. (2020). Peyhardi, Jean.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:36:y:2020:i:c:s1755534520300270.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Ahsanullah, M., Kibria, B. G. and Shakil, M. (2014), Normal distribution, in ‘Normal and Students t Distributions and Their Applications’, Springer, pp. 7–50.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Azzalini, A. and Arellano-Valle, R. B. (2013), ‘Maximum penalized likelihood estimation for skew-normal and skew-t distributions’, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 143(2), 419–433.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Azzalini, A. and Genton, M. G. (2008), ‘Robust likelihood methods based on the skew-t and related distributions ’, International Statistical Review 76(1), 106–129.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Börger, T. (2016), ‘Are fast responses more random? testing the effect of response time on scale in an online choice experiment’, Environmental and Resource Economics 65(2), 389–413.

5. Bansal, P ., Daziano, R. A. and Achtnicht, M. (2018), ‘Extending the logit-mixed logit model for a combination of random and fixed parameters’, Journal of choice modelling 27, 88–96.

6. Bansal, P ., Daziano, R. A. and Guerra, E. (2018), ‘Minorization-maximization (mm) algorithms for semiparametric logit models: Bottlenecks, extensions, and comparisons’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 115, 17–40.

7. Bazán, J. L., Bolfarine, H. and Branco, M. D. (2010), ‘A framework for skew-probit links in binary regression’, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 39(4), 678–697.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Beck, M. J., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2013), ‘Consistently inconsistent: The role of certainty, acceptability and scale in choice’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 56, 81–93.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A. T., Gopinath, D. A., Morikawa, T. and Polydoropoulou, A. (2002), ‘Integration of choice and latent variable models’, Perpetual motion: Travel behaviour research opportunities and application challenges pp. 431–470.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Bhat, C. R. (2003), ‘Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled halton sequences’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37(9), 837–855.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Bhat, C. R. (2014), ‘The composite marginal likelihood (CML) inference approach with applications to discrete and mixed dependent variable models’, Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 7(1), 1–117.

12. Bhat, C. R. (2015), ‘A new generalized heterogeneous data model (ghdm) to jointly model mixed types of dependent variables’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 79, 50–77.

13. Bhat, C. R. and Eluru, N. (2009), ‘A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43(7), 749–765.

14. Bhat, C. R. and Sidharthan, R. (2012), ‘A new approach to specify and estimate non-normally mixed multinomial probit models’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46(7), 817–833.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Bhat, C. R., Astroza, S. and Hamdi, A. S. (2017), ‘A spatial generalized ordered-response model with skew normal kernel error terms with an application to bicycling frequency’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 95, 126–148.

16. Bhat, C. R., Dubey, S. K. and Nagel, K. (2015), ‘Introducing non-normality of latent psychological constructs in choice modeling with an application to bicyclist route choice’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 78, 341–363.

17. Brathwaite, T. and Walker, J. L. (2018), ‘Asymmetric, closed-form, finite-parameter models of multinomial choice’, Journal of Choice Modelling 29, 78–112.

18. Brownstone, D. and Train, K. (1998), ‘Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns’, Journal of econometrics 89(1-2), 109–129.

19. Castillo, E., Menéndez, J. M., Jiménez, P . and Rivas, A. (2008), ‘Closed form expressions for choice probabilities in the weibull case’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42(4), 373–380.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Clark, W. A., Huang, Y. and Withers, S. (2003), ‘Does commuting distance matter?: Commuting tolerance and residential change’, Regional Science and Urban Economics 33(2), 199–221.

21. Craig, P . (2008), ‘A new reconstruction of multivariate normal orthant probabilities’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 70(1), 227–243.

22. De Leon, A. R. and Chough, K. C. (2013), Analysis of mixed data: methods & applications, CRC Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Dekker, T., Hess, S., Brouwer, R. and Hofkes, M. (2016), ‘Decision uncertainty in multi-attribute stated preference studies’, Resource and Energy Economics 43, 57–73.

24. Ding, P . (2016), ‘On the conditional distribution of the multivariate t distribution’, The American Statistician 70(3), 293–295.

25. Elrod, T., Johnson, R. D. and White, J. (2004), ‘A new integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95(1), 1–19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2010), ‘Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis’, Journal of the American Planning Association 76(3), 265–294.

27. Fisher, C., Bashyal, S. and Bachman, B. (2012), ‘Demographic impacts on environmentally friendly purchase behaviors’, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 20(3-4), 172–184.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Fosgerau, M. and Bierlaire, M. (2009), ‘Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43(5), 494–505.

29. Genz, A. (1992), ‘Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities’, Journal of computational and graphical statistics 1(2), 141–149.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Genz, A. and Bretz, F. (1999), ‘Numerical computation of multivariate t-probabilities with application to power calculation of multiple contrasts’, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 63(4), 103–117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Guevara, C. A., Cherchi, E. and Moreno, M. (2009), ‘Estimating random coefficient logit models with full covariance matrix: comparing performance of mixed logit and laplace approximation methods’, Transportation Research Record 2132(1), 87–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Hajivassiliou, V ., McFadden, D. and Ruud, P . (1996), ‘Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results’, Journal of econometrics 72(1-2), 85–134.

33. Jakobsson, N., Gnann, T., Plötz, P ., Sprei, F. and Karlsson, S. (2016), ‘Are multi-car households better suited for battery electric vehicles?–driving patterns and economics in sweden and germany’, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 65, 1–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Jones, M. (2002), ‘A dependent bivariate t distribution with marginals on different degrees of freedom’, Statistics & probability letters 56(2), 163–170.

35. Kim, S., Chen, M.-H. and Dey, D. K. (2007), ‘Flexible generalized t-link models for binary response data’, Biometrika 95(1), 93–106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Klein, N. J., Guerra, E. and Smart, M. J. (2018), ‘The Philadelphia story: Age, race, gender and changing travel trends’, Journal of Transport Geography 69, 19–25.

37. Koenker, R. and Yoon, J. (2009), ‘Parametric links for binary choice models: A fisherian–bayesian colloquy’, Journal of Econometrics 152(2), 120–130.

38. Lee, B. S. and McDonald, J. F. (2003), ‘Determinants of commuting time and distance for seoul residents: The impact of family status on the commuting of women’, Urban Studies 40(7), 1283–1302.

39. Li, B. (2011), ‘The multinomial logit model revisited: A semi-parametric approach in discrete choice analysis’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45(3), 461–473.

40. Liu, C. (2004), ‘Robit regression: A simple robust alternative to logistic and probit regression’, Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin’s Statistical Family pp. 227–238.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Lundhede, T. H., Olsen, S. B., Jacobsen, J. B. and Thorsen, B. J. (2009), ‘Handling respondent uncertainty in choice experiments: evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty’, Journal of Choice Modelling 2(2), 118–147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Marchenko, Y. V . and Genton, M. G. (2012), ‘A heckman selection-t model’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 107(497), 304–317.

43. Martínez, F., Aguila, F. and Hurtubia, R. (2009), ‘The constrained multinomial logit: A semi-compensatory choice model’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43(3), 365–377.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. McFadden, D. (1973), ‘Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior’, Frontiers in Econometrics pp. 105–142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. McQuaid, R. W. and Chen, T. (2012), ‘Commuting times–the role of gender, children and part-time work’, Research in transportation economics 34(1), 66–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Muehlegger, E. and Rapson, D. (2018), Understanding the distributional impacts of vehicle policy: Who buys new and used alternative vehicles?, Technical report, National Center for Sustainable Transportation.

47. Nagler, J. (1994), ‘Scobit: an alternative estimator to logit and probit’, American Journal of Political Science pp. 230–255.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

48. Nakayama, S. and Chikaraishi, M. (2015), ‘Unified closed-form expression of logit and weibit and its extension to a transportation network equilibrium assignment’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81, 672–685.

49. Olsen, S. B., Lundhede, T. H., Jacobsen, J. B. and Thorsen, B. J. (2011), ‘Tough and easy choices: testing the influence of utility difference on stated certainty-in-choice in choice experiments’, Environmental and Resource Economics 49(4), 491–510.

50. Paleti, R., Bhat, C. R. and Pendyala, R. M. (2013), ‘Integrated model of residential location, work location, vehicle ownership, and commute tour characteristics’, Transportation Research Record 2382(1), 162–172.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Patil, P . N., Dubey, S. K., Pinjari, A. R., Cherchi, E., Daziano, R. and Bhat, C. R. (2017), ‘Simulation evaluation of emerging estimation techniques for multinomial probit models’, Journal of choice modelling 23, 9–20.

52. Pewsey, A. (2000), ‘Problems of inference for azzalini’s skewnormal distribution’, Journal of Applied Statistics 27(7), 859–870.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Piatek, R. and Gensowski, M. (2017), ‘A multinomial probit model with latent factors: Identification and interpretation without a measurement system’.

54. Pinheiro, J. C., Liu, C. and Wu, Y. N. (2001), ‘Efficient algorithms for robust estimation in linear mixed-effects models using the multivariate t distribution’, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 10(2), 249– 276.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

55. Rashidi, T. H., Auld, J. and Mohammadian, A. K. (2012), ‘A behavioral housing search model: Two-stage hazard-based and multinomial logit approach to choice-set formation and location selection’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46(7), 1097–1107.

56. Schoemaker, P . J. (2013), Experiments on decisions under risk: The expected utility hypothesis, Springer Science & Business Media.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Shoup, D. (2005), The High Cost of Free Parking, Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago.

58. Spissu, E., Pinjari, A. R., Pendyala, R. M. and Bhat, C. R. (2009), ‘A copula-based joint multinomial discrete– continuous model of vehicle type choice and miles of travel’, Transportation 36(4), 403–422.

59. Stevens, M. R. (2017), ‘Does compact development make people drive less?’, Journal of the American Planning Association 83(1), 7–18.

60. Train, K. (2016), ‘Mixed logit with a flexible mixing distribution’, Journal of choice modelling 19, 40–53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. URL: http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/01944361003766766 Fang, H. A. (2008), ‘A discrete–continuous model of households’ vehicle choice and usage, with an application to the effects of residential density’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42(9), 736–758.

62. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692317307044 Koehler, E., Brown, E. and Haneuse, S. J.-P . (2009), ‘On the assessment of monte carlo error in simulationbased statistical analyses’, The American Statistician 63(2), 155–162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044 Swait, J. (2001), ‘A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35(10), 903–928.

64. Varin, C. and Vidoni, P . (2005), ‘A note on composite likelihood inference and model selection’, Biometrika 92(3), 519–528.

65. Varin, C., Reid, N. and Firth, D. (2011), ‘An overview of composite likelihood methods’, Statistica Sinica pp. 5– 42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Vij, A. and Krueger, R. (2017), ‘Random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models: Flexible nonparametric finite mixture distributions’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 106, 76–101.

67. Vijverberg, C.-P . C. and Vijverberg, W. P . (2016), ‘Pregibit: a family of binary choice models’, Empirical Economics 50(3), 901–932.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Wang, W.-L., Lin, T.-I. and Lachos, V . H. (2018), ‘Extending multivariate-t linear mixed models for multiple longitudinal data with censored responses and heavy tails’, Statistical methods in medical research 27(1), 48– 64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Do different visual presentation formats encourage different choice behaviors? discrete choice experiment on urban park landscapes. (2025). Asano, Michiko ; Ichinose, Daisuke ; Tajima, Kayo ; Kabaya, Kei.
   In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
   RePEc:spr:envpol:v:27:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-024-00405-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Does response lag affect travelers’ stated preference? Evidence from a real-time stated adaptation survey. (2025). Fujiwara, Akimasa ; Maruyama, Takuya ; Chikaraishi, Makoto ; Varghese, Varun.
   In: Transportation.
   RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10435-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Instinctiveness and reflexivity in behavioural type variability. (2025). Lotito, Gianna ; Ortona, Guido ; Migheli, Matteo.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:114:y:2025:i:c:s2214804324001599.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Evaluating the effects of a low-cost, online financial education program. (2025). Mitchell, Olivia ; Lusardi, Annamaria ; Sticha, Andrea ; Lin, Chuanhao ; Clark, Robert L.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:232:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125000721.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Cost vector effects in forced-choice discrete choice experiments: Assessing the acceptability of future glyphosate policies. (2025). Martinet, Vincent ; David, Maa ; Mermet-Bijon, Vincent ; Dit, Romain Crastes.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:55:y:2025:i:c:s1755534525000132.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Willingness to pay for renewables: Insights from a meta-analysis of choice experiments. (2024). Quiroga, Sonia ; Lopez-Otero, Xiral ; Solio, Mario ; Cerda, Emilio.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:130:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000094.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Public preference on sharing health data to inform research, health policy and clinical practice in Australia: A stated preference experiment. (2023). Robinson, Suzanne ; Boyd, James H ; Trevenen, Luke ; Ying, Crystal Man ; Randall, Sean ; Norman, Richard ; Varhol, Richard J.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0290528.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The economic value of coral reefs: Climate change impacts and spatial targeting of restoration measures. (2023). , Kirsten ; Ford, Derek J ; Fezzi, Carlo.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:203:y:2023:i:c:s0921800922002890.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The economic value of coral reefs: climate change impacts and spatial targeting of restoration measures. (2022). Derek, Mauro ; Fezzi, Carlo.
   In: DEM Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwprg:2022/5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Tourists€™ willingness to pay for holiday trip characteristics: A Discrete Choice Experiment. (2022). Mariel, Petr ; Alvarez, Antonio ; Pino, Jos Baos ; Boto-Garca, David.
    In: Tourism Economics.
    RePEc:sae:toueco:v:28:y:2022:i:2:p:349-370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Choice experiment selection of tourism destinations in a dual process theory framework: The role of decision style and potential to promote deliberation. (2022). Stemmer, Kathrin ; Lindberg, Kreg.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0270531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Ponderous, Proficient or Professional? Survey Experience and Smartphone Effects in Stated Preference Research. (2022). Grimsrud, Kristine ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Sandorf, Erlend Dancke.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:81:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-022-00654-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Inattention, availability bias, and attribute premium estimation for a biobased product. (2022). DeLong, Karen ; Lambert, Dayton ; Jensen, Kimberly L ; Cheng, Haotian.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:274-288.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Weighting or aggregating? Investigating information processing in multi‐attribute choices. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:1291-1305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. To pay or not to pay? Cost information processing in the valuation of publicly funded healthcare. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:276:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621001544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking. (2021). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Williams, Louis ; McSorley, Eugene.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:94:y:2021:i:c:s2214804321000938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Citizen involvement in the energy transition: Highlighting the role played by the spatial heterogeneity of preferences in the public acceptance of biofuels. (2020). Paris, Anthony ; Chèze, Benoît ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Gastineau, Pascal ; Cheze, Benoit.
    In: LEO Working Papers / DR LEO.
    RePEc:leo:wpaper:2828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Is respondents? inattention in online surveys a major issue for research?. (2020). Vecchio, Riccardo ; Borrello, Massimiliano ; Cembalo, Luigi ; Caso, Gerarda.
    In: Economia agro-alimentare.
    RePEc:fan:ecaqec:v:html10.3280/ecag1-2020oa10069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. A Generalized Continuous-Multinomial Response Model with a t-distributed Error Kernel. (2020). Dubey, Subodh ; Daziano, Ricardo A ; Bansal, Prateek ; Guerra, Erick.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:133:y:2020:i:c:p:114-141.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Product availability in discrete choice experiments with private goods. (2020). Palma, Marco ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Chavez, Daniel ; Mjelde, James W.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:36:y:2020:i:c:s1755534520300245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Public preference for river restoration in the Danda Basin, Nepal: A choice experiment study. (2020). Bohara, Alok ; Kunwar, Samrat B ; Thacher, Jennifer.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:175:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919315228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. A Generalized Continuous-Multinomial Response Model with a t-distributed Error Kernel. (2020). Dubey, Subodh ; Daziano, Ricardo A ; Bansal, Prateek ; Guerra, Erick.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1904.08332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Is respondents’ inattention in online surveys a major issue for research?. (2020). Vecchio, Riccardo ; Borrello, Massimiliano ; Cembalo, Luigi ; Caso, Gerarda.
    In: Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy.
    RePEc:ags:sieaea:305221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best–worst discrete choice experiments in health. (2019). Sicsic, Jonathan ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:28:y:2019:i:4:p:572-586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Some Experimental Evidence on Type Stability and Response Times.. (2019). ortona, guido ; Migheli, Matteo ; Lotito, Gianna.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:dipeco:201919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Did You Miss Something? Inattentive Respondents in Discrete Choice Experiments. (2019). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0296-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Understanding Farmers Reluctance to Reduce Pesticides use : a Choice Experiment. (2019). Martinet, Vincent ; David, Maia ; Chèze, Benoît ; Cheze, Benoit.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03192158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Choice certainty and deliberative thinking in discrete choice experiments. A theoretical and empirical investigation. (2019). Watson, Verity ; Sicsic, Jonathan ; Regier, Dean A.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:164:y:2019:i:c:p:235-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Towards flexible energy demand – Preferences for dynamic contracts, services and emissions reductions. (2019). Ruokamo, Enni ; Merilainen, Teemu ; Svento, Rauli ; Kopsakangas-Savolainen, Maria.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:84:y:2019:i:c:s0140988319303111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. How Best to Present Complex Ecosystem Information in Stated Preference Studies?. (2019). Tucker, Steven ; Hanley, Nick ; Eppink, Florian V.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:158:y:2019:i:c:p:20-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Public preferences for pesticide-free urban green spaces: a socio-economic survey. (2018). Laille, Pauline ; Pautrel, Masha Maslianskaia ; Lefebvre, Marianne.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02519184.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. (2018). Clithero, John A.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:61-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. The relationship between perceived difficulty and randomness in discrete choice experiments: Investigating reasons for and consequences of difficulty. (2017). Börger, Tobias ; Borger, Tobias ; Weiss, Soren ; Fror, Oliver.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2017-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Giving respondents “time to think” reduces response randomness in repeated discrete choice tasks. (2016). Börger, Tobias ; Borger, Tobias ; Cook, Joseph.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Neural antecedents of a random utility model. (2016). McFadden, Brandon ; Lusk, Jayson ; Crespi, John ; Martin, Laura ; Bradley, J ; Bruce, Amanda .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:132:y:2016:i:pa:p:93-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 17:15:48 || Missing content? Let us know