create a website

Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box. (2021). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Rustichini, Aldo.
In: Papers.
RePEc:arx:papers:2004.13376.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 104

References cited by this document

Cocites: 33

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Learning in Random Utility Models Via Online Decision Problems. (2022). Melo, Emerson.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2112.10993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. LEARNING IN RANDOM UTILITY MODELS VIA ONLINE DECISION PROBLEMS. (2021). Melo, Emerson.
    In: CAEPR Working Papers.
    RePEc:inu:caeprp:2022003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aczel, J. (1966). Lectures on functional equations and their applications. Academic Press. Agranov, M., Caplin, A., and Tergiman, C. (2015). Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 146-157.

  2. Alos-Ferrer, C., Fehr, E., and Netzer, N. (2018). Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy. Mimeo.

  3. ALQahtani, D. A., Rotgans, J. I., Mamede, S., ALAlwan, I., Magzoub, M. E. M., Altayeb, F. M., Mohamedani M. A., and Schmidt, H. G. (2016). Does time pressure have a negative eect on diagnostic accuracy? Academic Medicine, 91, 710-716.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Anderson, S. P., Goeree, J. K., and Holt, C. A. (2004). Noisy directional learning and the logit equilibrium. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 581-602.

  5. Ariely, D., and Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological science, 13, 219-224.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Arrow, K. J. (1959). Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica, 26, 121-127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Baldassi, C., Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., and Pirazzini, M. (2019). A behavioral characterization of the Drift Diusion Model and its multi-alternative extension for choice under time pressure. Management Science, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Baldassi, C., Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., and Pirazzini, M. (2019). Time stopped MCMC algorithms. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Ben-Akiva, M., and Morikawa, T. (1990). Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transportation Research, 24A, 485-495.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Ben-Akiva, M., and Morikawa, T. (1991). Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. In Koshi, M. (Ed.). Transportation and Tra c Theory, Proceedings of the 11th ISTTT (pp. 461-476). Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bhat, C. R. (1995). A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Research, 29B, 471-483.

  13. Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., and Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113, 700-765.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bornstein, A. M., Khaw, M. W., Shohamy, D., and Daw, N. D. (2017). Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans. Nature Communications, 8, 15958.

  15. Caplin, A., and Dean, M. (2014). Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition.

  16. Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., and Rustichini, A. (2016). Law of demand and forced choice. IGIER Working Paper 593.

  17. Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., and Rustichini, A. (2018). Law of demand and stochastic choice. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Chen, C., Chorus, C., Molin, E., and van Wee, B. (2016). Eects of task complexity and time pressure on activity-travel choices: heteroscedastic logit model and activity-travel simulator experiment. Transportation, 43, 455-472.

  19. Chiong, K., Shum, M., Webb, R., and Chen, R. (2019). Combining choices and response times in the …eld: a drift-diusion model of mobile advertisement. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Clithero, J. A. (2018). Improving out-of-sample predictions using response times and a model of the decision process. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 148, 344-375.

  21. Davidson, D., and Marschak, J. (1959). Experimental tests of a stochastic decision theory. In Measurement: De…nitions and Theories (C. W. Churchman, ed.), Wiley, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. de Palma, A., Fosgerau, M., Melo, E., Shum, M. (2019). Discrete choice and rational inattention: A general equivalence result. Mimeo.

  23. Dean, M., and Neligh, N. L. (2017). Experimental tests of rational inattention. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Debreu G. (1954). Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In Decision Processes (R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs and R. L. Davis, eds.), Wiley, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Debreu G. (1958). Stochastic choice and cardinal utility, Econometrica, 26, 440-444.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Debreu G. (1964). Continuity properties of Paretian utility, International Economic Review, 5, 285-293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Dewan, A., and Neligh, N. (2020). Estimating information cost functions in models of rational inattention. Journal of Economic Theory, 187, 105011.

  28. Ditterich, J. (2010). A comparison between mechanisms of multi-alternative perceptual decision making: ability to explain human behavior, predictions for neurophysiology, and relationship with decision theory. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Dupuis, P., and Ellis, R. E. (1997). A weak convergence approach to the theory of large deviations. Wiley, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Echenique, F., and Saito, K. (2018). General Luce model, Economic Theory, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Fehr, E., and Rangel, A. (2011). Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice— recent advances. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 3-30.

  32. Frick, M., Iijima, R., and Strzalecki, T. (2017). Dynamic random utility. Econometrica, 87, 1941-2002.

  33. Fudenberg, D., and Strzalecki, T. (2015). Dynamic logit with choice aversion. Econometrica, 83, 651-691.

  34. Fudenberg, D., Newey, W. K., Strack, P., and Strzalecki, T. (2019). Testing the Drift-Diusion Model. Mimeo.

  35. Fudenberg, D., Strack, P., and Strzalecki, T. (2018). Speed, accuracy, and the optimal timing of choices. American Economic Review, 108, 3651-3684.

  36. Gabaix, X., Laibson, D., Moloche, G., and Weinberg, S. (2006). Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. American Economic Review, 96, 1043-1068.

  37. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1936). The pure theory of consumers behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 50, 545-593.

  38. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1958). Threshold in Choice and the Theory of Demand. Econometrica, 26, 157-168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Geyer, C. (2011). Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo. In Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (S. Brooks, A. Gelman, G. L. Jones, X. Meng, eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., and Palfrey, T. R. (2016). Quantal response equilibrium: a stochastic theory of games. Princeton University Press.

  41. Gold, J. I., and Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron, 36, 299-308.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Gold, J. I., and Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535-574.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Hanks, T. D., Mazurek, M. E., Kiani, R., Hopp, E., and Shadlen, M. N. (2011). Elapsed decision time aects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 6339-6352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., and Polya, G. (1934). Inequalities. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Hensher, D. A., and Bradley, M. (1993). Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Marketing Letters, 4, 139-151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Hensher, D., Louviere, J., and Swait, J. (1999). Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics, 89, 197-221.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Huseynov, S., Krajbich, I., and Palma, M. A., 2018. No time to think: Food decision-making under time pressure. Mimeo.

  48. Karsilar, H., Simen, P., Papadakis, S., and Balci, F. (2014). Speed accuracy trade-o under response deadlines. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, Article 248.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kaufman, E.L., Lord, M.W., Reese, T.W., and Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Kelly, F. P. (2011). Reversibility and stochastic networks. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Kolmogorov, A. (1936). Zur theorie der Markoschen ketten. Mathematische Annalen, 112, 155-160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Krajbich, I., and Rangel, A. (2011). Multialternative drift-diusion model predicts the relationship between visual …xations and choice in value-based decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13852-13857.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Krajbich, I., Armel, C., and Rangel, A. (2010). Visual …xations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1292-1298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Krajbich, I., Lu, D., Camerer, C., and Rangel, A. (2012). The attentional drift-diusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Kreps, D. M. (1988). Notes on the theory of choice. Westview.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., and Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press.

  57. Lu, J. (2016). Random choice and private information. Econometrica, 84, 1983-2027.

  58. Luce, R. D. (1957). A theory of individual choice behavior. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis. Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Luce, R. D., and Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility and subjective probability. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., and Galanter, E. (Eds.). Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 3 (pp. 249-410). Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Luce, R. D., and Suppes, P. (2002). Representational measurement theory. In Yantis, S. (Ed.). Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1-41). Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Luck, S. J., and Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.

  63. Madras, N. N. (2002). Lectures on Monte Carlo methods. American Mathematical Society.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Matejka, F., and McKay, A. (2015). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. American Economic Review, 105, 272-298.

  65. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Zarembka, P. (Ed.). Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. McKelvey, R. D., and Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 6-38.

  67. McMillen, T., and Holmes, P. (2006). The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 30-57.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087-1092.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Milosavljevic, M., Malmaud, J., Huth, A., Koch, C., and Rangel, A. (2010). The drift diusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure. Judegment and Decision Making, 5, 437-449.

  70. Mosteller, F., and Nogee, P. (1951). An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 371-404.

  71. Mulder, M. J., Wagenmakers, E. J., Ratcli, R., Boekel, W., and Forstmann, B. U. (2012). Bias in the brain: a diusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payo. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2335-2343.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Natenzon, P. (2019). Random choice and learning. Journal of Political Economy, 127, 419-457.

  73. NBER Working Papers 19876 Caplin, A., Dean, M., and Leahy, J. (2019). Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice. The Review of Economic Studies, 86, 1061-1094.

  74. Ortega, P, and Stocker, A. A. (2016). Human decision-making under limited time. Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 Conference. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Papandreou, A. G. (1953). An experimental test of an axiom in the theory of choice. Econometrica, 21, 477.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Papandreou, A. G., Sauerlender, O. H., Brownlee, O. H., Hurwicz, L., and Franklin, W. (1957). A test of a stochastic theory of choice. University of California Publications in Economics, 16, 1-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Pieters, R., and Warlop, L. (1999). Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 1-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Pinsky, M., and Karlin, S. (2011). An introduction to stochastic modeling. Academic press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Plott, C. R. (1996). Rational individual behavior in markets and social choice processes: the discovered preference hypothesis. In Arrow, K., Colombatto, E., Perlaman, M., and Schmidt, C. (Eds.). The rational foundations of economic behavior (pp. 225-250). Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Proto, E., Rustichini, A., and So…anos, A. (2018). Intelligence, personality and gains from cooperation in repeated interactions. Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Quandt, R. E. (1956). A probabilistic theory of consumer behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 507-536.

  82. Rangel, A., and Clithero, J. A. (2014). The computation of stimulus values in simple choice. In Glimcher, P. W., and Fehr, E. (Eds.). Neuroeconomics (pp. 125-148). Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research. Expanded edition (1980), The University of Chicago Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In Neyman, J. (Ed.). Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol. 4 (pp. 321-333). University of California Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Ratcli, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Ratcli, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., and McKoon, G. (2016). Diusion decision model: current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 260-281.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Reutskaja, E., Nagel, R., Camerer, C. F., and Rangel, A. (2011). Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. American Economic Review, 101, 900-926.

  88. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., and Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision …eld theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 370.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Russo, J. E., and Rosen, L. D. (1975). An eye …xation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory & Cognition, 3, 267-276.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Rustichini, A., and Padoa-Schioppa, C. (2015). A neuro-computational model of economic decisions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Rustichini, A., Conen, K.E., Cai, X., Padoa-Schioppa, C. (2017). Optimal coding and neuronal adaptation in economic decisions. Nature Communications, 8, 1208.

  92. Saltzman, I.J., and Garner, W.R. (1948). Reaction time as a measure of span of attention. Journal of Psychology, 25, 227-241.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Shadlen, M. N., and Shohamy, D. (2016). Decision making and sequential sampling from memory. Neuron, 90, 927-939.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Shapley, L. S. (1975). Cardinal utility from intensity comparisons. RAND Working Paper R-1683-PR.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Steiner, J., Stewart, C., and Matejka, F. (2017). Rational inattention dynamics: inertia and delay in decision-making. Econometrica, 85, 521-553.

  96. Suppes, P., and Winet, M. (1955). An axiomatization of utility based on the notion of utility dierences. Management science, 1, 259-270.

  97. Swait, J., and Louviere, J. (1993). The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305-314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press.

  99. Vogel, E. K., and Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual dierences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.

  100. Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive representations of preferences: A new foundation of decision analysis. Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Webb, R. (2019). The (neural) dynamics of stochastic choice. Management Science, 65, 230-255.

  102. Woodford, M. (2014). Stochastic choice: an optimizing neuroeconomic model. American Economic Review, 104, 495-500.

  103. Zhang, T. (2006a). From -entropy to KL-entropy: Analysis of minimum information complexity density estimation. Annals of Statistics, 34, 2180-2210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Zhang, T. (2006b). Information-theoretic upper and lower bounds for statistical estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52, 1307-1321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Cognitive reflection in experimental anchored guessing games. (2024). Vorsatz, Marc ; Ballester, Coralio ; Rodriguez-Moral, Antonio.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:148:y:2024:i:c:p:179-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Speed, Accuracy, and Complexity. (2024). Gonccalves, Duarte.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2403.11240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Piercing the “Payoff Function” Veil: Tracing Beliefs and Motives. (2023). Halevy, Yoram ; Gallipoli, Giovanni ; Fenig, Guidon.
    In: Working Paper series.
    RePEc:rim:rimwps:23-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Using Response Times to Infer Others’ Private Information: An Application to Information Cascades. (2022). Krajbich, Ian ; Frydman, Cary.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:2970-2986.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Value of a Coordination Game. (2021). Sandroni, Alvaro ; Kager, Wouter.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:ymzrd_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The Value of a Coordination Game. (2021). Kets, Willemien ; Kager, Wouter ; Sandroni, Alvaro.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:ymzrd.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times. (2021). Buckenmaier, Johannes ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:24:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-020-09672-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Anchors of strategic reasoning in the traveler’s dilemma. (2021). Freeman, David ; Tong, Hanh T.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:191:y:2021:i:c:p:28-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Adaptive Rationality in Strategic Interaction: Do Emotions Regulate Thinking about Others?. (2021). Sunder, Shyam ; Ehrig, Timo ; Manjaly, Monica Jaison ; Singh, Aditya.
    In: Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:2227r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box. (2021). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Rustichini, Aldo.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2004.13376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A Theory of Strategic Uncertainty and Cultural Diversity. (2020). Kets, Willemien ; Sandroni, Alvaro.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:920.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The one player guessing game: a diagnosis on the relationship between equilibrium play, beliefs, and best responses. (2020). Meissner, Thomas ; Bosch-Rosa, Ciril.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:23:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-020-09642-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: outside and inside the black box. (2020). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Maccheroni, Fabio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:663.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Cost of Reasoning and Strategic Sophistication. (2020). Zhao, Wanqun.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:40-:d:417158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Effort is not a monotonic function of skills: Results from a global mobile experiment. (2020). Horenstein, Alex ; Grabiszewski, Konrad.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:176:y:2020:i:c:p:634-652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Attention in games: An experimental study. (2020). schotter, andrew ; Avoyan, Ala.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:124:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120300428.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Self-Selection Filters Irrationality in One-shot Games. (2020). Hollard, Guillaume ; Perez, Fabien.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:crs:wpaper:2020-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Understanding decision processes in guessing games: a protocol analysis approach. (2019). Capra, C. Monica.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:5:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40881-019-00074-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Additional deliberation reduces pessimism: evidence from the double-response method. (2019). Krawczyk, Michal ; Gawryluk, Katarzyna.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:5:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40881-019-00070-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics. (2018). Ortmann, Andreas ; Spiliopoulos, Leonidas.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:21:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-017-9528-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Exploring the role of deliberation time in non-selfish behavior: The double response method. (2018). Krawczyk, Michal ; Sylwestrzak, Marta.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:121-134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games. (2018). Vesterlund, Lise ; Riedl, Arno ; Recalde, Maria.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:160:y:2018:i:c:p:132-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. (2018). Clithero, John A.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:61-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Improving out-of-sample predictions using response times and a model of the decision process. (2018). Clithero, John A.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:148:y:2018:i:c:p:344-375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A window of cognition: Eyetracking the reasoning process in spatial beauty contest games. (2018). Wang, Joseph ; Chen, Chun-Ting ; Huang, Chen-Ying.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:111:y:2018:i:c:p:143-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Depth of Reasoning and Information Revelation: An Experiment on the Distribution of k-Levels. (2017). Kübler, Dorothea ; Benndorf, Volker ; Normann, Hans-Theo ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: International Game Theory Review (IGTR).
    RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:19:y:2017:i:04:n:s0219198917500219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box. (2017). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Maccheroni, F ; Rustichini, A.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Note on Disbelief in Others regarding Backward Induction. (2017). Grehl, Sascha ; Tuti, Andreas.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:33-:d:107453.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Inspired and inspiring: Hervé Moulin and the discovery of the beauty contest game. (2017). Nagel, Rosemarie ; Frank, Björn ; Buhren, Christoph.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:90:y:2017:i:c:p:191-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Reasoning about Others Reasoning. (2017). Penta, Antonio ; Alaoui, Larbi.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:1003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Who knows it is a game? On strategic awareness and cognitive ability. (2016). Huck, Steffen ; Fehr, Dietmar.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:19:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-015-9461-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Cognitive abilities and economic behavior. (2016). Smith, John ; Brañas-Garza, Pablo ; Braas-Garza, Pablo.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:64:y:2016:i:c:p:1-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Cognitive load and strategic sophistication. (2016). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean ; Allred, Sarah .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:125:y:2016:i:c:p:162-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-03 21:28:25 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.