create a website

Narrow Bracketing and Risk in Games. (2025). Tamuz, Omer ; Sandomirskiy, Fedor ; Wincelberg, Ben ; Sung, Po Hyun.
In: Papers.
RePEc:arx:papers:2502.11243.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 34

References cited by this document

Cocites: 21

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. A. Avoyan and A. Schotter. Attention in games: An experimental study. European Economic Review, 124:103410, 2020.

  2. A. E. Roth. Axiomatic models of bargaining, volume 170. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. B. Kőszegi and F. Matějka. Choice simplification: A theory of mental budgeting and naive diversification. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2):1153–1207, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. D. Read, G. Loewenstein, M. Rabin, G. Keren, and D. Laibson. Choice bracketing. Elicitation of preferences, pages 171–202, 2000.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. E. Friedman and F. Mauersberger. Quantal response equilibrium with symmetry: Representation and applications. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 240–241, 2022. J. K. Goeree and P. Louis. M equilibrium: A theory of beliefs and choices in games.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. E. Mazumdar, K. Panaganti, and L. Shi. Tractable equilibrium computation in Markov games through risk aversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14156, 2024. R. D. McKelvey and T. R. Palfrey. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Experimental economics, 8:347–367, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. F. Brandl and F. Brandt. An axiomatic characterization of Nash equilibrium. Theoretical Economics, 2024.

  9. F. Brandl and F. Brandt. Justifying optimal play via consistency. Theoretical Economics, 14(4):1185–1201, 2019.

  10. F. Sandomirskiy and O. Tamuz. Decomposable stochastic choice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04827, 2023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. G. Aubrun and I. Nechita. Catalytic majorization and ℓp norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:quantph /0702153v2, Jun 2007. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0702153v2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. H. Moulin. Cooperative microeconomics: a game-theoretic introduction. Princeton University Press, 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. H. Norde, J. Potters, H. Reijnierse, and D. Vermeulen. Equilibrium selection and consistency. Games and Economic Behavior, 12(2):219–225, 1996.

  14. J. C. Harsanyi and R. Selten. A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press Books, 1, 1988.

  15. J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Quantal response equilibrium: A stochastic theory of games. Princeton University Press, 2016.

  16. J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games and Economic Behavior, 45(1):97–113, 2003. J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Regular quantal response equilibrium.

  17. J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Stochastic game theory for social science: A primer on quantal response equilibrium. In Handbook of Experimental Game Theory, pages 8–47. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. J. R. Wright and K. Leyton-Brown. Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneousmove games. Games and Economic Behavior, 106:16–37, 2017.

  19. J. Shalev. Loss aversion equilibrium. International Journal of Game Theory, 29:269–287, 2000. W. Thomson. The Axiomatics of Economic Design: An introduction to theory and methods.

  20. J. Weinstein. The effect of changes in risk attitude on strategic behavior. Econometrica, 84(5):1881–1902, 2016.

  21. L. J. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1954. Reprinted by Dover Publications, 1972.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. L. P. Metzger and M. O. Rieger. Non-cooperative games with prospect theory players and dominated strategies. Games and Economic Behavior, 115:396–409, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. Games with procedurally rational players. American Economic Review, pages 834–847, 1998.

  24. M. K. Camara. Computationally tractable choice. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 28–28, 2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. M. Voorneveld. An axiomatization of the Nash equilibrium concept. Games and Economic Behavior, 117:316–321, 2019.

  26. N. Barberis, M. Huang, and R. H. Thaler. Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. American economic review, 96 (4):1069–1090, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. P. A. Haile, A. Hortaçsu, and G. Kosenok. On the empirical content of quantal response equilibrium. American Economic Review, 98(1):180–200, 2008.

  28. R. B. Myerson. Refinements of the Nash equilibrium concept. International journal of game theory, 7:73–80, 1978.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. R. D. Luce. Individual Choice Behavior: A theoretical analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1959.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. R. D. McKelvey, T. R. Palfrey, and R. A. Weber. The effects of payoff magnitude and heterogeneity on behavior in 2× 2 games with unique mixed strategy equilibria. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(4):523–548, 2000.

  31. S. Govindan and R. Wilson. Axiomatic theory of equilibrium selection for games with two players, perfect information, and generic payoffs. Technical Report 2008, Working Paper, 2009.

  32. T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer. Convicting the innocent: The inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. American Political Science Review, 92(1):23–35, 1998. doi: 10.2307/2585926.

  33. T. J. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer. The swing voter’s curse. The American economic review, pages 408–424, 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. X. Mu, L. Pomatto, P. Strack, and O. Tamuz. Monotone additive statistics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00618, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Response to A note on Brandl and Brandts axiomatic characterization of Nash equilibrium. (2025). Brandt, Felix ; Brandl, Florian.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:123333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Narrow Bracketing and Risk in Games. (2025). Tamuz, Omer ; Sandomirskiy, Fedor ; Wincelberg, Ben ; Sung, Po Hyun.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2502.11243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. An axiomatic characterization of Nash equilibrium. (2024). Brandl, Florian ; Brandt, Felix.
    In: Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:the:publsh:5825.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A note on Brandl and Brandt’s axiomatic characterization of Nash equilibrium. (2024). Schroeder, Andreas.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:123069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Rational inattention in games: experimental evidence. (2024). Martin, Daniel ; Almog, David.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:27:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-024-09843-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Mindfulness Training, Cognitive Performance and Stress Reduction. (2024). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Charness, Gary ; le Bihan, Yves.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04199093.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Examining the failure of gamification in implementing innovation from the perspective of problematization in the retail sectors of emerging economies. (2024). Pereira, Vijay ; Bhardwaj, Shikha ; Jayawardena, Nirma ; del Giudice, Manlio ; Zhang, Justin ; Behl, Abhishek.
    In: Technovation.
    RePEc:eee:techno:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0166497223002134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Mindfulness training, cognitive performance and stress reduction. (2024). Charness, Gary ; le Bihan, Yves ; Villeval, Marie Claire.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:217:y:2024:i:c:p:207-226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A Robust Characterization of Nash Equilibrium. (2024). Brandl, Florian ; Brandt, Felix.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2307.03079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Mindfulness Training, Cognitive Performance and Stress Reduction. (2023). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Charness, Gary ; le Bihan, Yves.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16457.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Mindfulness Training, Cognitive Performance and Stress Reduction. (2023). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Charness, Gary ; le Bihan, Yves.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:2315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Happy Times: Measuring Happiness Using Response Times. (2023). Netzer, Nick ; Liu, Shuo.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. A Story of Consistency: Bridging the Gap between Bentham and Rawls Foundations. (2023). Gonzalez, St'Ephane ; Pnevmatikos, Nikolaos.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2303.07488.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Beliefs and (in)stability in normal-form games. (2022). Terracol, Antoine ; Hyndman, Kyle ; Vaksmann, Jonathan.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09747-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Attention and salience in preference reversals. (2022). Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos ; Ritschel, Alexander.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-021-09740-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Investigating the failure to best respond in experimental games. (2022). Pulford, Briony ; Kölle, Felix ; Loomes, Graham ; Kolle, Felix ; Alempaki, Despoina ; Colman, Andrew M.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-021-09725-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Cognitive costs and misperceived incentives: Evidence from the BDM mechanism. (2022). Martin, Daniel ; Muoz-Rodriguez, Edwin.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:148:y:2022:i:c:s0014292122001155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Happy times: measuring happiness using response times. (2021). Netzer, Nick ; Liu, Shuo.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Value-Based Distance Between Information Structures. (2021). Renault, Jérôme ; Gensbittel, Fabien ; Peski, Marcin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01869139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The personalization–privacy paradox in the attention economy. (2020). Cloarec, Julien.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:161:y:2020:i:c:s0040162520311252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Reasoning about others reasoning. (2020). Penta, Antonio ; Alaoui, Larbi ; Janezic, Katharina A.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:189:y:2020:i:c:s0022053120300855.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-25 02:43:47 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.