A. Avoyan and A. Schotter. Attention in games: An experimental study. European Economic Review, 124:103410, 2020.
- A. E. Roth. Axiomatic models of bargaining, volume 170. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- B. KÅszegi and F. MatÄjka. Choice simplification: A theory of mental budgeting and naive diversification. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2):1153â1207, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- D. Read, G. Loewenstein, M. Rabin, G. Keren, and D. Laibson. Choice bracketing. Elicitation of preferences, pages 171â202, 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- E. Friedman and F. Mauersberger. Quantal response equilibrium with symmetry: Representation and applications. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 240â241, 2022. J. K. Goeree and P. Louis. M equilibrium: A theory of beliefs and choices in games.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- E. Mazumdar, K. Panaganti, and L. Shi. Tractable equilibrium computation in Markov games through risk aversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14156, 2024. R. D. McKelvey and T. R. Palfrey. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Experimental economics, 8:347â367, 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
F. Brandl and F. Brandt. An axiomatic characterization of Nash equilibrium. Theoretical Economics, 2024.
F. Brandl and F. Brandt. Justifying optimal play via consistency. Theoretical Economics, 14(4):1185â1201, 2019.
- F. Sandomirskiy and O. Tamuz. Decomposable stochastic choice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04827, 2023.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- G. Aubrun and I. Nechita. Catalytic majorization and âp norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:quantph /0702153v2, Jun 2007. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0702153v2.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- H. Moulin. Cooperative microeconomics: a game-theoretic introduction. Princeton University Press, 1995.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
H. Norde, J. Potters, H. Reijnierse, and D. Vermeulen. Equilibrium selection and consistency. Games and Economic Behavior, 12(2):219â225, 1996.
J. C. Harsanyi and R. Selten. A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press Books, 1, 1988.
J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Quantal response equilibrium: A stochastic theory of games. Princeton University Press, 2016.
J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games and Economic Behavior, 45(1):97â113, 2003. J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Regular quantal response equilibrium.
- J. K. Goeree, C. A. Holt, and T. R. Palfrey. Stochastic game theory for social science: A primer on quantal response equilibrium. In Handbook of Experimental Game Theory, pages 8â47. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
J. R. Wright and K. Leyton-Brown. Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneousmove games. Games and Economic Behavior, 106:16â37, 2017.
J. Shalev. Loss aversion equilibrium. International Journal of Game Theory, 29:269â287, 2000. W. Thomson. The Axiomatics of Economic Design: An introduction to theory and methods.
J. Weinstein. The effect of changes in risk attitude on strategic behavior. Econometrica, 84(5):1881â1902, 2016.
- L. J. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1954. Reprinted by Dover Publications, 1972.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- L. P. Metzger and M. O. Rieger. Non-cooperative games with prospect theory players and dominated strategies. Games and Economic Behavior, 115:396â409, 2019.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. Games with procedurally rational players. American Economic Review, pages 834â847, 1998.
- M. K. Camara. Computationally tractable choice. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 28â28, 2022.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
M. Voorneveld. An axiomatization of the Nash equilibrium concept. Games and Economic Behavior, 117:316â321, 2019.
- N. Barberis, M. Huang, and R. H. Thaler. Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. American economic review, 96 (4):1069â1090, 2006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
P. A. Haile, A. Hortaçsu, and G. Kosenok. On the empirical content of quantal response equilibrium. American Economic Review, 98(1):180â200, 2008.
- R. B. Myerson. Refinements of the Nash equilibrium concept. International journal of game theory, 7:73â80, 1978.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- R. D. Luce. Individual Choice Behavior: A theoretical analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1959.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
R. D. McKelvey, T. R. Palfrey, and R. A. Weber. The effects of payoff magnitude and heterogeneity on behavior in 2Ã 2 games with unique mixed strategy equilibria. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(4):523â548, 2000.
S. Govindan and R. Wilson. Axiomatic theory of equilibrium selection for games with two players, perfect information, and generic payoffs. Technical Report 2008, Working Paper, 2009.
T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer. Convicting the innocent: The inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. American Political Science Review, 92(1):23â35, 1998. doi: 10.2307/2585926.
- T. J. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer. The swing voterâs curse. The American economic review, pages 408â424, 1996.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- X. Mu, L. Pomatto, P. Strack, and O. Tamuz. Monotone additive statistics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00618, 2021.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now