create a website

The Role of Bioenergy in Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy – Study on EU Countries. (2019). Cirstea, Stefan Dragos ; Popa, Irimie Emil ; Radu, Gabriel.
In: The Audit Financiar journal.
RePEc:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:75.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 69

References cited by this document

Cocites: 28

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Impact of Bioenergy on Economic Growth and Development: An European Perspective. (2023). Kalogiannidis, Stavros ; Chatzitheodoridis, Fotios ; Kontsas, Stamatis ; Syndoukas, Dimitrios.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2023-03-54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Positioning Bio-Based Energy Systems in a Hypercomplex Decision Space—A Case Study. (2021). Lakner, Zoltan ; Duleba, Szabolcs ; Olah, Judit ; Popp, Jozsef ; Kiss, Anna.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4366-:d:597484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Global Risks, Local Challenges for Employment. (2019). Calea, Sorin ; Postelnicu, Catalin.
    In: Montenegrin Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:15:y:2019:i:2:195-206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. [online] Available at: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX: 32009L0028> [Accessed 16 September 2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. AE The Role of Bioenergy in Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy ‒ Study on EU Countries 86 Amfiteatru Economic Andrei, J.V., Ion, R.A., Popescu, H.G., Nica, E. and Zaharia, M., 2016. Implications of agricultural bioenergy crop production and prices in changing the land use paradigm— The case of Romania. Land Use Policy, 50, pp.399-407.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. AE The Role of Bioenergy in Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy ‒ Study on EU Countries 88 Amfiteatru Economic Mahalingam, B. and Orman, W.H., 2018. GDP and energy consumption: A panel analysis of the US. Applied Energy, 213, pp.208-218.

  4. Akbi, A., Saber, M., Aziza, M. and Yassaa, N., 2017. An overview of sustainable bioenergy potential in Algeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, pp.240-245.

  5. Alsaleh, M., Abdul-Rahim, A.S. and Mohd-Shahwahid, H.O., 2017. Determinants of technical efficiency in the bioenergy industry in the EU28 region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, pp.1331-1349.

  6. Ang, B.W. and Goh, T., 2018. Bridging the gap between energy-to-GDP ratio and composite energy intensity index. Applied Energy, 119, pp.105-102.

  7. Appunn, K., 2016. Bioenergy in Germany – facts and figures on development, support and investment. [online] Available at: <https://www.cleanenergywire.org/ factsheets/bioenergy-germany-facts-and-figures-development-support-and-investment> [Accessed 10 September2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Aslani, A., Helo, P. and Naaranoja, M., 2014. Role of renewable energy policies in energy dependency in Finland: System dynamics approach. Applied Energy, 113, pp.758-765.

  9. Bădescu, G., 1999. Metode de reducere a datelor. În: Rotariu T., coord., 1999. Metode statistice aplicate în ştiinţele sociale. Iași: Polirom, pp.254-271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bahel, E., Marrouch, W. and Gaudet, G., 2013. The economics of oil, biofuel and food commodities. Resource and Energy Economics, 35(4), pp.599-617.

  11. Bildiricia, M. and Özaksoy, F., 2016. Woody biomass energy consumption and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Procedia Economics and Finance, 38, pp.287-293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Boschiero, M., Cherubini, F., Nati, C. and Zerbe, S., 2016. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from orchards woody residues in Northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), pp.2569-2580.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Chen, C.C., McCarl, B.A., Chang, C.C. and Tso, C., 2011. Evaluation the potential economic impacts of Taiwanese biomass energy production. Biomass Bioenergy, 35, pp.1693-1701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Contributions of the Disciplines Studying the Mechanisms of Human Behavior at Understanding the Transition to Bioeconomy AE Vol. 21 • No. 50 • February 2019 87 Global Energy Assessment (GEA), 2011. Toward a Sustainable Future. Viena: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Contributions of the Disciplines Studying the Mechanisms of Human Behavior at Understanding the Transition to Bioeconomy AE Vol. 21 • No. 50 • February 2019 89 Shin, J., Shina, W.-S. and Lee, C., 2013. An energy security management model using quality function deployment and system dynamics. Energy Policy, 54, pp.72-86.

  16. Dabija, D.C., Bejan, B. and Grant, D., 2018. The impact of consumer green behaviour on green loyalty among retail formats: A Romanian case study. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26(3), pp.173-185.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Do Paco, A., Alves, H., Shiel, C., Filho, W.L., 2013. Development of a green consumer behaviour model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(4), pp.414-421.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. European Commision (EC), 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe. Brussels: European Commision.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. European Parliament (EP), 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC. Brussels: European Parliament.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Eurostat, 2016. Renewable Energy Statistics. Eurostat-Statistics Explained 2016. [online] Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php> [Accessed 10 September 2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D. and Polasky, S.H., 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319, pp.1235-1238.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Fonseca, A., Macdonald, A., Dandy, E. and Valenti, P., 2011. The state of sustainability reporting at Canadian universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), pp.22-40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Grando. R.F. et al., 2017. Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, pp.44-53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Guivarch, C. and Monjon, S., 2017. Identifying the main uncertainty drivers of energy security in a low-carbon world: The case of Europe. Energy Economics, 64, pp.530-541.

  25. Hoefnagels, R., Resch, G., Junginger, M. and Faaij, A., 2014. International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union. Applied Energy, 131, pp.19-157.

  26. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011. Technology roadmap: biofuels for transport. Paris: IEA Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris: IEA Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2013. Renewable power generation costs in 2012: an overview. Renewable power generation costs by technology. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2018. International Renewable Energy Agency Database, 2018. [online] Available at: <http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/ dashboard> [Accessed 12 July 2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014: AR5 synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., eds. 2014. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Jin, E. and Sutherland, J.W., 2016. A proposed integrated sustainability model for a bioenergy system. Procedia CIRP, 48, pp.358-363.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Jouveta, P.-A., Le Cadre, E. and Orset, C., 2012. Irreversible investment, uncertainty, and ambiguity: The case of bioenergy sector. Energy Economics, 34(1), pp.45-53.

  33. Junginger, M., van Dam, J., Zarrilli, S. and Ali, F., 2011. Opportunities and barriers for international bioenergy trade. Energy Policy, 39(4), pp.2028-2042.

  34. Kanchana, K., McLellan, B.C. and Unesaki, H., 2016. Energy dependence with an Asian twist? Examining international energy relations in Southeast Asia. Energy Research & Social Science, 21, pp.123-140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kirmani, M.D. and Khan, M.N., 2016. Environmental concern to attitude towards green products: Evidence from India. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(2), pp.159-179.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kung, C.C., McCarl, B.A., Chen, C.C. and Cao, X.Y., 2014. Environmental impact and bioenergy production from pyrolysis in Taiwan. Energy & Environment, 25(1), pp.13-39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. M’Barek, R., Philippidis, G., Suta, C., Vinyes, C., Caivano, A., Ferrari, E., Ronzon, T., Sanjuan Lopez, A. and Santini, F., 2014. Observing and analyzing the bioeconomy in the EU—adapting data and tools to new questions and challenges. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 1, pp.83-91.

  38. Magar, S. B., Pelkonen, P., Tahvanainen, L., Toivonen, R. and Toppinen, A., 2011. Growing trade of bioenergy in the EU: Public acceptability, policy harmonization, European standards and certification needs. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(8), pp.3318-3327.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Matsumoto, K. and Shiraki, H., 2018. Energy security performance in Japan under different socioeconomic and energy conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, pp.391-401.

  40. Matzenberger, J., Kranzi, L., Tromborg, E., Junginger, M., Daiaglou, V., Sheng Goh, C. and Keramidas, K., 2015. Future perspectives of international bioenergy trade. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, pp.926-941.

  41. Mccormick, K. and Willquist, K., 2015. The Bioeconomy: An introduction to the world of bioenergy. Lund: Lund University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Necula, C., 2012. Econometrie. Suport de curs. [online] Available at: < http://www.cnp.ro/ user/repository/econometrie.nivel1.v3.2>, [Accessed 30 November 2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. OECD/IEA, 2011. International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2011. Paris: IEA Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Opincariu-Dan, C., 2011. Statistică aplicată în ştiinţele socio-umane: analiza relaţiilor şi a diferenţelor statistice. Constanţa: Psihologul expert.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Owen, M., van der Plas, R. and Sepp, S., 2013. Can there be energy policy in Sub-Saharan Africa without biomass? Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(2), pp.146-152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Ozturk, I., Aslan, A. and Kalyoncu, H., 2010. Energy consumption and economic growth relationship: Evidence from panel data for low and middle income countries. Energy Policy, 38(8), pp.4422-4428.

  47. Patel, S., Naik, V. and Patel, P., 2015. An analysis of application of multiple comparison tests (post-hoc) in Anova in recently published medical research literature. National Journal of Community Medicine, 6(1), pp.117-120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Peterman, N.E. and Kennedy, J., 2003. Enterprise education: Influencing Students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), pp.129-144.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Ragauskas, A.J., 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science, 311, pp.484-489.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Ros, J. et al., 2012. Sustainability of biomass in a bio-based economy. Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Sözen, A., 2009. Future projection of the energy dependency of Turkey using artificial neural network. Energy Policy, 37(11), pp.4827-4833.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Sava, F., 2004. Analiza datelor în cercetarea psihologică – metode statistice complementare. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASCR.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Scarlat, N., Blujdea, V. and Dallemand, J.-F., 2011. Assessment of the availability of agricultural and forest residues for bioenergy production in Romania. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, pp.1995-2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F. and Nita, V., 2015. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmental Development, 15, pp.3-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Schleich, J., Walz, R. and Ragwitz, M., 2017. Effects of policies on patenting in wind-power technologies. Energy Policy, 108, pp.684-695.

  56. Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D. and Yu, T.H., 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science, 319, pp. 1238-1240.

  57. Sillanpää, M. and Ncibi, C., 2017. A Sustainable Bioeconomy. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, pp.29-53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Silveira, S., Khatiwada, D., Leduc, S., Kraxner, F., Venkata, B.K., Tilvikine, V., Gaubyte, V., Romagnoli, F., Tauraite, E., Kundas, S., Blumberga, D., Peterson, K., Utsar, K., Vigants, E., Kalinichenko, A., 2017. Opportunities for bioenergy in The Baltic Sea Region. Energy Procedia, 128, pp.157-164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Sow, M.T., 2014. Using ANOVA to examine the relationship between safety & security and human development. Journal of International Business and Economics, 2(4), pp.101-106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Srebotnjaka, T. and Hardi, P., 2011. Prospects for sustainable bioenergy production in selected former communist countries. Ecological Indicators, 11, pp.1009-1019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M. and McCormick, K., 2013. Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches.

  62. United Nations (UN), 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, New York: United Nations.

  63. van Dam, J., Faaij, A.P.C., Lewandowski, I. and Van Zeebroeck, B., 2009. Options of biofuel trade from Central and Eastern to Western European countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, pp.728-744.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Wang, S., Li, Q., Fang, C. and Zhou, C., 2016. The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment, 542(A), pp.360-371.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Winchester, N. and Ledvina, K., 2017. The impact of oil prices on bioenergy, emissions and land use. Energy Economics, 65, pp.219-227.

  66. World Bank, 2018. Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) Database. 2018. [online] Available at: <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.RNEW.ZS>, [Accessed 30 August 2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. World Energy Council (WEC), 2016. World Energy Resources: Bioenergy 2016, London: World Energy Council.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Xingang, Z. and Pingkuo, L., 2014. Focus on bioenergy industry development and energy security in China. Renewable and Sustainable. Energy Reviews, 32, pp.302-312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Yang, Y., Solgaard, H.S. and Haider, W., 2016. Wind, hydro or mixed renewable energy source: Preference for electricity products when the share of renewable energy increases. Energy Policy, 97, pp.521-531.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The resilience dynamics of energy ETF accessibility and stock market sentiment in China during the post-pandemic era. (2025). Wen, Jun ; Yin, Hua-Tang ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; He, Yushuang ; Yang, Hongming.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324007692.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. What is the relationship between energy consumption and economic development? New evidence from a rapidly growing economic development region. (2023). Wang, Yafei ; Hu, Mengmeng ; Huang, Guohe ; Xia, Beicheng.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02196-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Economic Growth and Sustainable Transition: Investigating Classical and Novel Factors in Developed Countries. (2023). Chortok, Yulija ; Wang, Wei ; Piven, Vladyslav ; Kubatko, Oleksandr ; Derykolenko, Oleksandr ; Wei, Kehui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12346-:d:1216817.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Optimal Path for China to Achieve the “Dual Carbon” Target from the Perspective of Energy Structure Optimization. (2023). Yin, Zhigang ; Jiang, QI.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10305-:d:1182872.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A Conceptual Exploration of How the Pursuit of Sustainable Energy Development Is Implicit in the Genuine Progress Indicator. (2022). Gunnarsdottir, Ingunn ; Cook, David ; Davisdottir, Brynhildur.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2129-:d:771055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Thriving or Surviving in the Energy Industry: Lessons on Energy Production from the European Economies. (2022). Batrancea, Larissa M ; Tulai, Horia.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8532-:d:973062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Dynamic evolution and driving factors of new energy development: Fresh evidence from China. (2022). Pan, Yuling ; Dong, Feng.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:176:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522000075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Factor decomposition for global and national aggregate energy intensity change during 2000–2014. (2022). Su, Bin ; Yang, Xue ; Xu, HE.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222012506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Energy intensity, economic growth and environmental quality in populous Middle East countries. (2022). Shokoohi, Zeinab ; Dehbidi, Navid Kargar ; Tarazkar, Mohammad Hassan.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pc:s0360544221024129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Is the ETS an effective environmental policy? Undesired interaction between energy-mix, fuel-switch and electricity prices. (2022). Falbo, Paolo ; Mastroeni, Loretta ; Bersani, Alberto M.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:110:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322001554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of global electric power consumption (1992–2019) by utilizing consistent nighttime light data from DMSP-OLS and NPP-VIIRS. (2022). Wang, Ting ; Hu, Ting ; Chen, Tiexi ; Jin, Shuanggen ; Yan, Qingyun.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:322:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922007991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A threshold extension of spatial dynamic panel model with fixed effects. (2021). Matsuda, Yasumasa ; Wu, Junyue.
    In: Journal of Spatial Econometrics.
    RePEc:spr:jospat:v:2:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s43071-021-00008-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Empirical exploration of remittances and renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh. (2021). Carels, Luc ; Das, Anupam ; McFarlane, Adian.
    In: Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science.
    RePEc:spr:apjors:v:5:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s41685-020-00180-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A hybrid approach for examining the drivers of energy consumption in Shanghai. (2021). Luo, Yulong ; Wang, Yueqiang ; Hu, Xianbiao ; Zeng, Weiliang ; Zhang, Hua ; Li, Danzhou.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121008492.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Exploring the nexus between non-renewable and renewable energy consumptions and economic development: Evidence from panel estimations. (2021). Tiwari, Aviral ; Sharma, Gagan ; Mundi, Hardeep Singh ; Erkut, Burak.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s136403212100441x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Development of energy balance table for rural and urban households and evaluation of energy consumption in Indian states. (2021). Hanaoka, Tatsuya ; Yawale, Satish Kumar ; Kapshe, Manmohan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:136:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120306808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Understanding green building energy performance in the context of commercial estates: A multi-year and cross-region analysis using the Australian commercial building disclosure database. (2021). Gou, Zhonghua ; Gui, Xuechen.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:222:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221002371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. How Costly is Energy Conservation? The Energy-GDP Relationship Re-examined for Turkey. (2021). Canakci, Mehmet.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-04-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Relationship between Primary Energy Consumption and Real Gross Domestic Product: Evidence from Major Asian Countries. (2020). Liu, Wen-Chi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2568-:d:336439.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The ignition of the bio water-coal fuel particles based on coals of different degree metamorphism. (2020). Kostoreva, Zh A ; Syrodoy, S V ; Yu, N ; Kuznetsov, G V.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:201:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220308082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Do urbanization, income, and trade affect electricity consumption across Chinese provinces?. (2020). Tiwari, Aviral ; Gregori, Tullio.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:89:y:2020:i:c:s0140988320301407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Energy consumption and GDP revisited: A new panel data approach with wavelet decomposition. (2020). Kristjanpoller, Werner ; Saldivia, Mauricio ; Olson, Josephine E.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:272:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920307194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Factors influencing energy requirements and CO2 emissions of households in Thailand: A panel data analysis. (2019). Kuwornu, John ; Dhakal, Shobhakar ; Meangbua, Onicha.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:521-531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A novel locally adaptive method for modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of global electric power consumption based on DMSP-OLS nighttime stable light data. (2019). Huang, Xin.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:240:y:2019:i:c:p:778-792.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Potential energy saving via overall efficiency relying on quality of life. (2019). Nadimi, Reza ; Tokimatsu, Koji.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:233-234:y:2019:i::p:283-299.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Role of Bioenergy in Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy – Study on EU Countries. (2019). Cirstea, Stefan Dragos ; Popa, Irimie Emil ; Radu, Gabriel.
    In: The Audit Financiar journal.
    RePEc:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Role of Bioenergy in Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy – Study on EU Countries. (2019). Cirstea, Stefan Dragos ; Popa, Irimie Emil ; Radu, Gabriel.
    In: The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.
    RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Direct absorption solar collector (DASC) modeling and simulation using a novel Eulerian-Lagrangian hybrid approach: Optical, thermal, and hydrodynamic interactions. (2018). Sharaf, Omar Z ; Abu-Nada, Eiyad ; Kyritsis, Dimitrios C ; Al-Khateeb, Ashraf N.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:231:y:2018:i:c:p:1132-1145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 02:56:58 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.