Abraham, D., Greiner, B., & Stephanides, M. (2023). On the Internet you can be anyone: An experiment on strategic avatar choice in online marketplaces. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 206, 251-261.
Anderson, C. M., & Putterman, L. (2006). Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand? The demand for punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(1), 1-24.
Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising.
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544-555.
Atlas, S., & Putterman, L. (2011). Trust among the avatars: A virtual world experiment, with and without textual and visual cues. Southern Economic Journal, 78(1), 63-86.
- Baccon, L. A., Chiarovano, E., & MacDougall, H. G. (2019). Virtual reality for teletherapy: Avatars may combine the benefits of face-to-face communication with the anonymity of online text-based communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(2), 158-165.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(1), 43-57.
- Brown, G., Hust, J., Büttner, S., & Prilla, M. (2022). “The Impact of Varying Resolution and Motion Realism of Avatars in Augmented Reality-Supported, Virtually Colocated Sales Consultations.” In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022 (pp. 255-264).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Burnham, T. C. (2003). Engineering altruism: A theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50(1), 133-144.
Bursztyn, L., & Jensen, R. (2017). Social image and economic behavior in the field: Identifying, understanding, and shaping social pressure. Annual Review of Economics, 9(1), 131-153.
Butz, B., & Harbring, C. (2021). The effect of disclosing identities in a socially incentivized public good game. Games, 12(2), 32.
- Can We ‘Solve’ Anonymity in Economic Experiments? Virtual Humans in High-Immersive Environments as a Method of Identification — 37/39 Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? Evidence from a natural field experiment. Experimental Economics, 11, 299-314.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Can We ‘Solve’ Anonymity in Economic Experiments? Virtual Humans in High-Immersive Environments as a Method of Identification — 38/39 Füllbrunn, S., Richwien, K., & Sadrieh, A. (2011). Trust and trustworthiness in anonymous virtual worlds. Journal of Media Economics, 24(1), 48-63.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Can We ‘Solve’ Anonymity in Economic Experiments? Virtual Humans in High-Immersive Environments as a Method of Identification — 39/39 Sampaio, W. M., Freitas, A. L., Rêgo, G. G., Morello, L. Y., & Boggio, P. S. (2023). Effects of co-players’ identity and reputation in the public goods game. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 13520.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chamberlin, E. H. (1948). An experimental imperfect market. Journal of Political Economy, 56(2), 95-108.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 29-35.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chesney, T., Chuah, S. H., & Hoffmann, R. (2009). Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 618-635.
Christens, S., Dannenberg, A., & Sachs, F. (2019). Identification of individuals and groups in a public goods experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 82, 101445.
Duffy, J. (2011). Trust in second life. Southern Economic Journal, 78(1), 53-62.
Dufwenberg, M., & Muren, A. (2006). Generosity, anonymity, gender. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(1), 42-49.
- Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: a field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 172-178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fiedler, M. (2009). Cooperation in virtual worlds. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61, 173-194.
Fiedler, M., & Haruvy, E. (2009). The lab versus the virtual lab and virtual field—An experimental investigation of trust games with communication. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(2), 716-724.
Fiedler, M., Haruvy, E., & Li, S. X. (2011). Social distance in a virtual world experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 72(2), 400-426.
Fiore, S. M., Harrison, G. W., Hughes, C. E., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Virtual experiments and environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(1), 65-86.
- Fox, J., & Guyer, M. (1978). “Public” choice and cooperation in n-person prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22(3), 469-481.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(3), 95-113.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fraser, A. D., Branson, I., Hollett, R. C., Speelman, C. P., & Rogers, S. L. (2024). Do realistic avatars make virtual reality better? Examining human-like avatars for VR social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), 100082.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Graff, F., Grund, C., & Harbring, C. (2021). Competing on the Holodeck-The effect of virtual peers and heterogeneity in dynamic tournaments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101596.
Greiner, B., Caravella, M., & Roth, A. E. (2014). Is avatarto -avatar communication as effective as face-to-face communication? An Ultimatum Game experiment in First and Second Life. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 374-382.
- Gürerk, Ö., Bönsch, A., Kittsteiner, T., & Staffeldt, A. (2019). Virtual humans as co-workers: A novel methodology to study peer effects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 78, 17-29.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Haruvy, E., Li, S. X., McCabe, K., & Twieg, P. (2017). Communication and visibility in public goods provision. Games and Economic Behavior, 105, 276-296.
Horky, F., Krell, F., & Fidrmuc, J. (2023). Setting the stage: Fairness behavior in virtual reality dictator games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 107, 102114.
Innocenti, A. (2017). Virtual reality experiments in economics. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 69, 71-77.
- Kang, S. H., & Watt, J. H. (2013). The impact of avatar realism and anonymity on effective communication via mobile devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1169-1181.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., & Takala, T. (2015). A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 390.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kim, D. Y., Lee, H. K., & Chung, K. (2023). Avatarmediated experience in the metaverse: The impact of avatar realism on user-avatar relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103382.
- Kolkmeier, J., Vroon, J., & Heylen, D. (2016). “Interacting with virtual agents in shared space: Single and joint effects of gaze and proxemics.” In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 16th International Conference, IVA 2016, Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 20–23, 2016, Proceedings 16 (pp. 1-14). Springer International Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007 a). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(2), 153-174.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007 b). On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 40(2), 347-370.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2009). Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, 53(1), 1-18.
- Luo, L., Weng, D., Ding, N., Hao, J., & Tu, Z. (2023). The effect of avatar facial expressions on trust building in social virtual reality. The Visual Computer, 39(11), 5869-5882.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mol, J. M. (2019). Goggles in the lab: Economic experiments in immersive virtual environments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 79, 155-164.
Mol, J. M., van der Heijden, E. C., & Potters, J. J. (2020). (Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer. Experimental Economics, 23, 961-978.
Norwood, F. B., & Lusk, J. L. (2011). Social desirability bias in real, hypothetical, and inferred valuation experiments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(2), 528-534.
- Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153-178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2008). The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 147470490800600314.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Reaney, M. (1999). Virtual reality and the theatre: immersion in virtual worlds. Digital Creativity, 10(3), 183188.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rege, M., & Telle, K. (2004). The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations.
Rigdon, M., Ishii, K., Watabe, M., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Minimal social cues in the dictator game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 358-367.
Rosenblat, T. S. (2008). The beauty premium: Physical attractiveness and gender in dictator games. Negotiation Journal, 24(4), 465-481.
Samek, A., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2017). Selective recognition: How to recognize donors to increase charitable giving. Economic Inquiry, 55(3), 1489-1496.
Savikhin Samek, A., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2014). Recognizing contributors: an experiment on public goods. Experimental Economics, 17, 673-690.
Scharlemann, J. P., Eckel, C. C., Kacelnik, A., & Wilson, R. K. (2001). The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 617-640.
Soetevent, A. R. (2005). Anonymity in giving in a natural context—a field experiment in 30 churches. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11-12), 2301-2323.
- Solnick, S. J., & Schweitzer, M. E. (1999). The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 199-215.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Spann, M., Hinz, O., Hann, I. H., & Skiera, B. (2010). Decision making in virtual worlds: An experimental test of altruism, fairness and presence.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sun, N., & Botev, J. (2021). Intelligent autonomous agents and trust in virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100146.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tarnec, H. L., Bevacqua, E., Augereau, O., & De Loor, P. (2023, September). “Effect of Avatar Facial Expressiveness on Team Collaboration in Virtual Reality.” In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 1-8).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Winking, J. (2014). Anonymity versus privacy in the dictator game: Revealing donor decisions to recipients does not substantially impact donor behavior. PloS one, 9(12), e115419.
- Yu, R., Hu, P., & Zhang, P. (2015). Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 13452.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now