1. Investigations of decision processes at the intersection of psychology and economics. (2024). Sofianos, Andis ; Lohse, Johannes ; Rahal, Rima-Maria ; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael ; Wollbrant, Conny.
   In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
   RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0167487024000497.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency. (2024). Wengström, Erik ; Piovesan, Marco ; Zaccagni, Sarah ; Willadsen, Helene ; Wengstrom, Erik.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:220:y:2024:i:c:p:495-506.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Conditionality of adaptiveness: Investigating the relationship between numeracy and adaptive behavior. (2023). Mondal, Supratik ; Traczyk, Jakub.
   In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
   RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:96:y:2023:i:c:s0167487023000120.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Afriat, Sydney N. The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. International Economic Review 8, no. 1 (1967): 67-77.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Agranov, Marina, and Pietro Ortoleva. Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. Journal of Political Economy 125, no. 1 (2017): 40-68.

3. Allred, S., Duffy, S. and Smith, J., 2016. Cognitive load and strategic sophistication. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 125, pp.162-178.

4. Almlund, M., Duckworth, A.L., Heckman, J. and Kautz, T., 2011. Personality psychology and economics. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1-181). Elsevier.

5. Andersson, Ola, Håkan J. Holm, Jean-Robert Tyran, and Erik Wengström. Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Preferences or Noise? Journal of the European Economic Association 14, no. 5 (2016): 1129-1154.

6. Barrouillet, Pierre, Sophie Bernardin, Sophie Portrat, Evie Vergauwe, and Valérie Camos. Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33, no. 3 (2007): 570.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Benjamin, D. J., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2013). Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(6), 1231-1255.

8. Camerer, Colin F. An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and uncertainty 2, no. 1 (1989): 61-104.

9. Carpenter, Jeffrey, Michael Graham, and Jesse Wolf. Cognitive ability and strategic sophistication. Games and Economic Behavior 80 (2013): 115-130.

10. Dave, Chetan, Catherine C. Eckel, Cathleen A. Johnson, and Christian Rojas. Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 41, no. 3 (2010): 219-243.

11. Deck, Cary, and Salar Jahedi. The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments. European Economic Review 78 (2015): 97-119.

12. Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, and Uwe Sunde. On the relationship between cognitive ability and risk preference. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32, no. 2 (2018): 115-34.

13. Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9, no. 3 (2011): 522-550.

14. Duffy, Sean, and John Smith. Cognitive load in the multi-player prisoner's dilemma game: Are there brains in games? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 51 (2014): 47-56.

15. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 281–295.

16. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 1–17.

17. Falk, A., Kosse, F., Pinger, P., Schildberg-Hörisch, H., & Deckers, T. (2019). Socio-economic status and inequalities in children’s IQ and economic preferences. Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming).

18. Filippin, Antonio, and Paolo Crosetto. A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Science 62, no. 11 (2016): 3138-3160.

19. Fischbacher, Urs. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental economics 10, no. 2 (2007): 171-178.

20. Frederick, Shane. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, no. 4 (2005): 25-42.

21. Gerhardt, Holger, Guido P. Biele, Hauke R. Heekeren, and Harald Uhlig. Cognitive load increases risk aversion. No. 2016-011. SFB 649 Discussion Paper, 2016.

22. Greiner, Ben. Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association 1, no. 1 (2015): 114-125.

23. Gul, Faruk, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. Random expected utility. Econometrica 74, no. 1 (2006): 121-146.

24. Heckman, James J. and Edward Vytlacil. 2001. “Identifying the Role of Cognitive Ability in Explaining the Level of and Change in the Return to Schooling.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1):1–12.

25. Hey, John D. Why we should not be silent about noise. Experimental Economics 8, 4 (2005): 325345.

26. Hey, John D., and Chris Orme. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica (1994): 1291-1326.

27. Hey, John D., and Enrica Carbone. Stochastic choice with deterministic preferences: An experimental investigation. Economics Letters 47, no. 2 (1995): 161-167.

28. Houthakker, Hendrik S. Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica 17, no. 66 (1950): 159-174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Jacobson, Sarah, and Ragan Petrie. Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 38, no. 2 (2009): 143-158.

30. Krajbich, I., Oud, B. and Fehr, E., 2014. Benefits of neuroeconomic modeling: new policy interventions and predictors of preference. American Economic Review, 104(5), pp.501-06.

31. Lohse, J., 2016. Smart or selfish–When smart guys finish nice. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, pp.28-40.

32. McFadden, Daniel. Economic choices. American Economic Review 91, 3 (2001): 351-378.

33. Rabin, Matthew, and Georg Weizsäcker. Narrow bracketing and dominated choices. American Economic Review 99, 4 (2009): 1508-43.

34. Rabin, Matthew, and Richard H. Thaler. Anomalies: risk aversion. Journal of Economic perspectives 15, 1 (2001): 219-232.

35. Samuelson, Paul A. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica 15, 60 (1948): 243-253.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Schmidt, Frank L. and John E. Hunter. 2004. “General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (1):162–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Shiv Baba and Alexander Fedorikhin. “Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 26, (1999): 278–292.

38. Starmer, Chris, and Robert Sugden. Probability and juxtaposition effects: An experimental investigation of the common ratio effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, no. 2 (1989): 159-178.

39. Toplak, Maggie E., Richard F. West, and Keith E. Stanovich. Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning 20, no. 2 (2014): 147-168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Tversky, Amos. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological review 76, no. 1 (1969): 31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Whitney, Paul, Christa A. Rinehart, and John M. Hinson. Framing effects Under Cognitive Load: The Role of Working Memory in Risky Decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(6), (2008): 1179-1184. Online Appendix (not intended for print publication)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Multiple Switching and Data Quality in the Multiple Price List. (2021). Zhang, Y. Jane ; Zuo, Sharon Xuejing ; Yu, Chi Wai.
   In: The Review of Economics and Statistics.
   RePEc:tpr:restat:v:103:y:2021:i:1:p:136-150.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Imposing choice on the uninformed: the case of dynamic currency conversion. (2020). Ewerhart, Christian ; Li, Sheng.
   In: ECON - Working Papers.
   RePEc:zur:econwp:345.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Strength of preference and decisions under risk. (2020). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
   In: ECON - Working Papers.
   RePEc:zur:econwp:330.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy. (2020). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
   In: ECON - Working Papers.
   RePEc:zur:econwp:306.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Randomization and Ambiguity Aversion. (2020). Ke, Shaowei ; Zhang, QI.
   In: Econometrica.
   RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:88:y:2020:i:3:p:1159-1195.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience. (2020). Gottlieb, Daniel ; Ortoleva, Pietro ; Dejarnette, Patrick ; Dillenberger, David.
   In: Econometrica.
   RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:619-656.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?. (2020). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:99417.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Reconsidering Risk Aversion. (2020). Kimball, Miles ; Benjamin, Daniel ; Fontana, Mark Alan.
   In: NBER Working Papers.
   RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28007.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems. (2020). Foucart, Renaud ; Bouacida, Elias.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:lan:wpaper:301646245.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Why do people prefer randomisation? An experimental investigation. (2020). Permana, Yudistira.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:88:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-019-09719-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Dual choice axiom and probabilistic choice. (2020). Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:61:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-020-09332-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. A Behavioral Characterization of the Drift Diffusion Model and Its Multialternative Extension for Choice Under Time Pressure. (2020). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Pirazzini, Marco ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Baldassi, Carlo.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:11:p:5075-5093.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers). (2020). Sobbrio, Francesco ; Germano, Fabrizio.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:187:y:2020:i:c:s0047272720300529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Preferences for power. (2020). Pikulina, Elena S ; Tergiman, Chloe.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:185:y:2020:i:c:s0047272720300372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Randomization under ambiguity: Efficiency and incentive compatibility. (2020). Liu, Zhiwei ; Song, Xinxi ; Yannelis, Nicholas C.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:90:y:2020:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games. (2020). Shogren, Jason ; Malézieux, Antoine ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, S ; Malezieux, A.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:124:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120300015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Cognitive abilities and risk taking: the role of preferences. (2020). Lohse, Johannes ; Drouvelis, Michalis.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:20-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Black-Box Strategies and Equilibrium for Games with Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Players. (2020). Anantharam, Venkat ; Phade, Soham R.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2004.09592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Revealed statistical consumer theory. (2019). Dziewulski, Pawel ; Allen, Roy ; Rehbeck, John.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sus:susewp:1119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?. (2019). Smith, John ; Gussman, Steven ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:93126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment. (2019). Macis, Mario ; Lacetera, Nicola ; Elias, Julio.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Why choice lists increase risk taking. (2019). Mayraz, Guy ; Freeman, David.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9586-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. “Dice”-sion–Making Under Uncertainty: When Can a Random Decision Reduce Risk?. (2019). Wiesemann, Wolfram ; Delage, Erick ; Kuhn, Daniel.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:7:p:3282-3301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice. (2019). Webb, Ryan.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:230-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Revealed preferences under uncertainty: Incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization. (2019). Riedl, Arno ; Cettolin, Elena.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:547-585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Choice-theoretic foundations of the divisive normalization model. (2019). Glimcher, Paul ; Steverson, Kai ; Brandenburger, Adam.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:164:y:2019:i:c:p:148-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment. (2019). Macis, Mario ; Lacetera, Nicola ; Elias, Julio.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:201910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Flipping a coin: Evidence from university applications. (2018). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Kübler, Dorothea ; Dwenger, Nadja ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:209666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Smokers’ Rational Lexicographic Preferences for Cigarette Package Warnings: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Eye Tracking. (2018). Triunfo, Patricia ; Gerstenbluth, Mariana ; Harris, Jeffrey E.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The Economic Relevancy of Risk Preferences Elicited Online and With Low Stakes. (2018). Johnson, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:87231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience. (2018). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Gottlieb, Daniel ; Dejarnette, Patrick ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:18-021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Flipping a coin: Evidence from university applications. (2018). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Kübler, Dorothea ; Dwenger, Nadja ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:167:y:2018:i:c:p:240-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Fechner’s strong utility model for choice among n>2 alternatives: Risky lotteries, Savage acts, and intertemporal payoffs. (2018). Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:75-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. (2018). Clithero, John A.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:61-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Random intertemporal choice. (2018). Lu, Jay ; Saito, Kota.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:177:y:2018:i:c:p:780-815.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Nick, Netzer ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1811.02497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Opinion Dynamics via Search Engines (and other Algorithmic Gatekeepers). (2018). Sobbrio, Francesco ; Germano, Fabrizio.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1810.06973.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. No Time to Think: Food Decision-Making under Time Pressure. (2018). Palma, Marco ; Huseynov, Samir ; Krajbich, Ian.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. On the Roots of the Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights: Evidence from France and Japan. (2017). Tarroux, Benoît ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Ferreira, João.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:2017-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Aligning Democracy: A Comment on Bruno S. Frey’s “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future”. (2017). Kendall, Ryan.
    In: Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:homoec:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s41412-017-0053-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Indifference or indecisiveness: a strict discrimination. (2017). Ong, Qiyan ; Qiu, Jianying.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Indifference or indecisiveness: a strict discrimination. (2017). Ong, Qiyan ; Qiu, Jianying.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Deliberately Stochastic. (2017). Riella, Gil ; Ortoleva, Pietro ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:17-013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. On the Roots of the Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights: Evidence from France and Japan. (2017). Tarroux, Benoît ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Ferreira, João.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Goal-based models for discrete choice analysis. (2017). Swait, Joffre.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:72-88.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Breaking Bad: When Being Disadvantaged Incentivizes (Seemingly) Risky Behavior. (). Gibson, John.
    In: Eastern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:pal:easeco:v::y::i::d:10.1057_s41302-020-00172-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 18:00:25 || Missing content? Let us know