This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abela, M. and A. Mora (2012), ‘Understanding the Consequences of Accounting Standards in Europe: The Role of EFRAG’, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 147–70.

2. Bamber, M. and K. McMeeking (2016), ‘An Examination of International Accounting Standard‐setting Due Process and the Implications for Legitimacy’, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 59–73.

3. Benston, G. J. G., M. Bromwich, and A. Wagenhofer (2006), ‘Principles‐ versus Rules‐based Accounting Standards: The FASB's Standard Setting Strategy’, Abacus, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 165–88.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Botzem, S. (2012), The Politics of Accounting Regulation: Organizing Transnational Standard Setting in Financial Reporting, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Botzem, S. (2014), ‘Transnational Standard Setting in Accounting: Organizing Expertise‐based Self‐regulation in Times of Crises’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 933–55.

6. Botzem, S. and L. Dobusch (2012), ‘Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards’, Organization Studies, Vol. 33, Nos 5–6, pp. 737–62.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Bradbury, M. (2007), ‘An Anatomy of an IFRIC Interpretation’, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 109–22.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Bradbury, M. E. and L. B. Schröder (2012), ‘The Content of Accounting Standards: Principles versus Rules’, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 1–10.

9. Brown, P. and A. Tarca (2007), ‘Achieving High Quality, Comparable Financial Reporting: A Review of Independent Enforcement Bodies in Australia and the United Kingdom’, Abacus, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 438–73.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Cairns D. (1999), Applying International Accounting Standards (2nd ed.), Butterworths, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Camfferman, K. and S. A. Zeff (2007), Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets: A History of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973–2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

12. Camfferman, K. and S. A. Zeff (2015), Aiming for Global Accounting Standards: The International Accounting Standards Board 2001–2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

13. Camfferman, K. and S. A. Zeff (2018), ‘The Challenge of Setting Standards for a Worldwide Constituency: Research Implications from the IASB's Early History’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 289–312.

14. Chapple, S., L. Moerman, and K. Rudkin (2010), ‘IFRIC 13: Accounting for “Customer Loyalty Programmes”’, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 124–45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Cheung, E. and J. Lau (2016), ‘Readability of Notes to the Financial Statements and the Adoption of IFRS’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 162–76.

16. Clatworthy, M. and M. J. Jones (2003), ‘Financial Reporting of Good News and Bad News: Evidence from Accounting Narratives’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 171–85.

17. Daum, L. and C. Pelger (2021), ‘Implementing a New Accounting Standard: A Study on the Politics of Co‐constructing the Meaning of IFRS 17 in the Transition Resource Group’, Conference presentation at the 16th EUFIN Conference, 2–3 September.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (FEE) (2001). ‘Enforcement Mechanisms in Europe. A Preliminary Investigation of Oversight Systems’, April, retrieved from https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/publications/enforcement-mechanisms/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Flick, U. (2013), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage Publications, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Fogarty, T. J. (1992), ‘Financial Accounting Standard Setting as an Institutionalized Action Field: Constraints, Opportunities and Dilemmas’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 331–55.

21. Georgiou, G. (2010), ‘The IASB Standard‐setting Process: Participation and Perceptions of Financial Statement Users’, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 103–18.

22. Giner, B. (2014), ‘Accounting for Emission Trading Schemes: A Still Open Debate’, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 45–51.

23. Giner, B. and M. Arce (2012), ‘Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on Share‐based Payments’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 655–91.

24. Howieson, B. A. (2009), ‘Agenda Formation and Accounting Standards Setting: Lessons from the Standards Setters’, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 577–98.

25. IASB and IFASS (2006), ‘Statement of Best Practice: Working Relationships Between the IASB and Other Accounting Standard Setters’, retrieved from http://www.aeca.es/old/actualidadnic/noticias4/4_3.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. IFRS Foundation (2012), ‘Report of the Trustees’ Review of Efficiency and Effectiveness of the IFRS Interpretations Committee’, retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/groups/trustees/review-of-ifrs-ic-2012.pdf?la=en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. IFRS Foundation (2013), Due Process Handbook, IFRS Foundation, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation (IASCF) (2005), Consultative Document: IFRIC – Review of Operations, IASCF, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation (IASCF) (2007), Due Process Handbook for the IFRIC: Approved by the Trustees January 2007, IASCF, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Jones, M. J. and P. A. Shoemaker (1994), ‘Accounting Narratives: A Review of Empirical Studies of Content and Readability’, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 13, pp. 142–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Jorissen, A., N. Lybaert, R. Orens, and L. Van Der Tas (2012), ‘Formal Participation in the IASB's Due Process of Standard Setting: A Multi‐issue/Multi‐period Analysis’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 693–729.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Kenny, S. Y. and R. K. Larson (2009), ‘Interpreting IFRS’, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 208, No. 4, pp. 60–4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Kohler, H., C. Pochet, and Y. Gendron (2021), ‘Networks of Interpretation: An Ethnography of the Quest for IFRS Consistency in a Global Accounting Firm’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101277.

34. Krippendorff, K. (1980), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Sage, Newbury Park.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Larson, R. K. (2002), ‘The IASC's Search for Legitimacy: An Analysis of the IASC's Standing Interpretations Committee’, Advances in International Accounting, Vol. 15, pp. 79–120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Larson, R. K. (2007), ‘Constituent Participation and the IASB's International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee’, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 207–54.

37. Leuz, C. (2018), ‘Evidence‐based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 582–608.

38. Li, F. (2008), ‘Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 45, Nos 2–3, pp. 221–47.

39. Linnenluecke, M. K., J. Birt, X. Chen, X. Ling, and T. Smith (2017), ‘Accounting Research in Abacus, A&F, AAR, and AJM from 2008–2015: A Review and Research Agenda’, Abacus, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 159–79.

40. Mayring, P. (2004), ‘Qualitative Content Analysis’, in U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, and I. Steinke (eds), A Companion to Qualitative Research, Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 266–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Meyer J. W. and B. Rowan (1991), ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 41–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Nicolaisen, D. T. (2005), ‘Statement by SEC Staff: A Securities Regulator Looks at Convergence’, April, retrieved from www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch040605dtn.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Pelger, C. and N. Spieß (2017), ‘On the IASB's Construction of Legitimacy: The Case of the Agenda Consultation Project’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 64–90.

44. Ram, R. and S. Newberry (2017), ‘Agenda Entrance Complexity in International Accounting Standard Setting: The Case of IFRS for SMEs’, Abacus, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 485–512.

45. Ramassa, P. and G. Leoni (2022), ‘Standard setting in times of technological change: accounting for cryptocurrency holdings’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 1598–624.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Richardson, A. J. and B. Eberlein (2011), ‘Legitimating Transnational Standard‐setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 217–45.

47. Sacho, Z. Y. and J. G. I. Oberholster (2008), ‘Factors Impacting on the Future of the IASB’, Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 117–37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

48. Schmidt, M. (2002), ‘On the Legitimacy of Accounting Standard Setting by Privately Organised Institutions in Germany and Europe’, Schmalenbach Business Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 171–93.

49. Schreier, M. (2012), Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice, Sage Publications, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Schreier, M. (2013), ‘Qualitative Content Analysis’, in U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage Publications, London, pp. 170–83.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (2000), ‘International Accounting Standards. Concept Release’, February, retrieved from //www.sec.gov/rules/concept/34-42430.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Singleton‐Green, B. (2010), ‘The Communication Gap: Why Doesn't Accounting Research Make a Greater Contribution to Debates on Accounting Policy?’, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 129–45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Suchman, M. C. (1995), ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 571–610.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Turner, L. E. and J. H. Godwin (1999), ‘Auditing, Earnings Management, and International Accounting Issues at the Securities and Exchange Commission’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 281–97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Van Mourik, C. and P. Walton (Eds) (2013), The Routledge Companion to Accounting, Reporting and Regulation, Routledge, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Wahlen, J. M., J. R. Boatsman, R. H. Herz, R. G. Jennings, G. J. Jonas, K. G. Palepu, K. R. Petroni, et al. (1999), ‘Response to IASC Discussion Paper: Shaping IASC for the Future’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 443–52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Wüstemann, J. and S. Wüstemann (2010), ‘Why Consistency of Accounting Standards Matters: A Contribution to the Rules‐versus‐principles Debate in Financial Reporting’, Abacus, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Zeff, S. A. (2002), ‘“Political” Lobbying on Proposed Standards: A Challenge to the IASB’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 43–54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Zeff, S. A. (2007), ‘Some Obstacles to Global Financial Reporting Comparability and Convergence at a High Level of Quality’, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 290–302.

60. Zeff, S. A. (2012), ‘The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 807–37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Giving sense to and making sense of OCI: When each component makes sense, but the whole does not. (2024). Durocher, Sylvain ; Dugal, Lea ; Picard, Claire-France.
   In: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING.
   RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:99:y:2024:i:c:s1045235424000169.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Maintaining and extending hegemony: The politics of accounting standard setting. (2024). Warren, Rebecca.
   In: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING.
   RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:99:y:2024:i:c:s1045235423001429.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. DETERMINANTS IN THE STANDARDS REVIEW PROCESS: AN ANALYSIS OF IFRS FOR SMES. (2024). Maria, Sitea Daria ; Andreea, Bogoslov Ioana ; Alexandra-Gabriela, Marina.
   In: Revista Economica.
   RePEc:blg:reveco:v:76:y:2024:i:4:p:38-47.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Interpreting IFRS: The Evolving Role of Agenda Decisions. (2024). Ramassa, Paola ; Quagli, Alberto.
   In: Abacus.
   RePEc:bla:abacus:v:60:y:2024:i:2:p:205-235.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena. (2022). Ram, Ronita ; Afolabi, Hammed ; Rimmel, Gunnar.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5517-:d:808500.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Beyond intentionality in accounting regulation: Habitual strategizing by the IASB. (2022). Stenka, Renata.
   In: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING.
   RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:88:y:2022:i:c:s1045235421000137.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The legitimacy of global accounting rules: a note on the challenges from path-dependence theory. (2021). Pittroff, Esther.
   In: Journal of Management & Governance.
   RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:25:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09546-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Early Traces of Materiality and Relevance Principles in Luca Pacioli’s Tractatus XI. (2021). Coda, Riccardo ; Modarelli, Giuseppe ; Rainero, Christian ; Migliavacca, Alessandro.
   In: International Journal of Business and Management.
   RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:9:p:153.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The influence of opportunistic capital structure disclosure in international financial reporting on nonprofessional investors. (2021). Schmidt, Regan N ; Elkins, Hamilton ; Entwistle, Gary.
   In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation.
   RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:42:y:2021:i:c:s1061951821000033.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. FOR A NEW METHOD OF CALCULATING THE DISCLOSURE INDEX. (2020). Baazaoui, Hedi.
    In: Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting.
    RePEc:cpn:umkcjf:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:9-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. IASBs independence in the due process: an examination of interest groups’ influence on the development of IFRS 9. (2020). Hewa, Samindi Ishara ; Mala, Rajni ; Chen, Jinhua.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:60:y:2020:i:3:p:2585-2615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Accountability in an Independent Regulatory Setting: The Use of Impact Assessment in the Regulation of Financial Reporting in the UK. (2019). Turley, Stuart W ; Samsonova-Taddei, Anna.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:155:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-017-3527-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Commentary: Where is International Accounting Research Going? Issues Needing Further Investigation. (2019). Morris, Richard D ; Ho, Joanna H ; Gotti, Giorgio ; Gordon, Elizabeth A ; Mora, Araceli.
    In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation.
    RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:37:y:2019:i:c:s1061951819300448.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The use of made-up users. (2019). Jaworska, Sylvia ; Stenka, Renata.
    In: Accounting, Organizations and Society.
    RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:78:y:2019:i:c:s036136821930042x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The European IFRS Endorsement Process – in Search of a Single Voice. (2018). Walton, Peter ; van Mourik, Carien.
    In: Accounting in Europe.
    RePEc:taf:acceur:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:1-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. La participación en el /Participation in the IASB Due Process. (2018). Mesa, Rafael Bautista ; Sanchez, Horacio Molina.
    In: Estudios de Economia Aplicada.
    RePEc:lrk:eeaart:36_2_5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The role of Politics and Economics in the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption/La influencia de la política y la economía en la adopción de las Normas Internacionales de Info. (2018). Mora, Araceli.
    In: Estudios de Economia Aplicada.
    RePEc:lrk:eeaart:36_2_4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Identifying lobbying strategies: An analysis of public responses to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into executive remuneration in Australia. (2018). Beaumont, Stacey ; Clarkson, Peter ; Tutticci, Irene.
    In: Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:14:y:2018:i:3:p:288-306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Mandatory Financial Reporting Processes and Outcomes. (2018). Petrovic, Nikola ; Bamber, Matthew ; McMeeking, Kevin.
    In: The International Journal of Accounting.
    RePEc:eee:accoun:v:53:y:2018:i:3:p:227-245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. (ANT)agonistics: Pluralistic politicization of, and by, accounting and its technologies. (2016). Dillard, Jesse ; Vinnari, Eija.
    In: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING.
    RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:39:y:2016:i:c:p:25-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting. (2015). Walker, Martin ; Mora, Araceli.
    In: Accounting and Business Research.
    RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:45:y:2015:i:5:p:620-650.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Involving academics in the accounting standard setting process: an application of the Delphi methodology to the assessment of IASB proposals. (2014). Calvo, Jose ; Alvarez, Igor ; Mora, Araceli.
    In: Journal of Management & Governance.
    RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:18:y:2014:i:3:p:765-791.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Dialogue with standard setters. (2013). Pieri, Valerio ; Onesti, Tiziano ; Fiume, Raffaele.
    In: FINANCIAL REPORTING.
    RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2013-003008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Dialogue with standard setters. (2013). Fiume, Raffaele.
    In: FINANCIAL REPORTING.
    RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2013-001007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Increasing the relevance of Policy Relevant Research. (2013). Mora, Araceli.
    In: FINANCIAL REPORTING.
    RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2013-001002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-05 08:35:27 || Missing content? Let us know