create a website

Dealing with low‐probability shocks: The role of selected heuristics in farmers’ risk management decisions. (2023). Musshoff, Oliver ; Offermann, Frank ; Duden, Christoph.
In: Agricultural Economics.
RePEc:bla:agecon:v:54:y:2023:i:3:p:382-399.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 117

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. A note on European farmers preferences under cumulative prospect theory. (2024). Rommel, Jens ; Finger, Robert ; Garcia, Viviana ; McCallum, Chloe.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:75:y:2024:i:1:p:465-472.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Albizua, A., Bennett, E. M., Larocque, G., Krause, R. W., & Pascual, U. (2021). Social networks influence farming practices and agrarian sustainability. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0244619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244619.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alekseev, A., Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2017). Experimental methods: When and why contextual instructions are important. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 134, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.005.

  3. Andersson, M., Hedesström, M., & Gärling, T. (2014). A social‐psychological perspective on herding in stock markets. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2014.941062.

  4. Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J.‐ R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Preferences or noise? Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(5), 1129–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12179.

  5. Apesteguia, J., Huck, S., & Oechssler, J. (2007). Imitation—Theory and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Theory, 136(1), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2006.07.006.

  6. Babcock, B. A. (2015). Using cumulative prospect theory to explain anomalous crop insurance coverage choice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(5), 1371–1384. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav032.

  7. Barberis, N. (2013). The Psychology of tail events: Progress and challenges. American Economic Review, 103(3), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.611.

  8. Bauermeister, G.‐ F., Hermann, D., & Mußhoff, O. (2018). Consistency of determined risk attitudes and probability weightings across different elicitation methods. Theory and Decision, 84(4), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238‐017‐9616‐x.

  9. Berg, N. (2014). Success from satisficing and imitation: Entrepreneurs' location choice and implications of heuristics for local economic development. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1700–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.016.

  10. Bocquého, G., Jacquet, F., & Reynaud, A. (2014). Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field‐experiment data. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt006.

  11. Botzen, W. J. W., Kunreuther, H., & Michel‐Kerjan, E. (2015). Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City. Judgement and Decision Making, 10(4), 365–385.

  12. Bougherara, D., Gassmann, X., Piet, L., & Reynaud, A. (2017). Structural estimation of farmers’ risk and ambiguity preferences: A field experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(5), 782–808. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbx011.

  13. Bozzola, M., & Finger, R. (2020). Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: Evidence from Italy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 48(3), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaa021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bradbury, M. A. S., Hens, T., & Zeisberger, S. (2015). Improving investment decisions with simulated experience. Review of Finance, 19(3), 1019–1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfu021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Bruhin, A., Fehr‐Duda, H., & Epper, T. (2010). Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica, 78(4), 1375–1412. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7139.

  16. Buchholz, M., & Musshoff, O. (2021). Tax or green nudge? An experimental analysis of pesticide policies in Germany. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 48(4), 940–982. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbab019.

  17. Camerer, C. F., & Kunreuther, H. (1989). Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8(4), 565–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/3325045.

  18. Cerroni, S. (2020). Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments. Agricultural Economics, 51(5), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12587.

  19. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between‐subject and within‐subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009.

  20. Conley, T. G., & Udry, C. R. (2010). Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Review, 100(1), 35–69. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.35.

  21. Darnhofer, I. (2014). Resilience and why it matters for farm management. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu012.

  22. Delfino, A., Marengo, L., & Ploner, M. (2016). I did it your way. An experimental investigation of peer effects in investment choices. Journal of Economic Psychology, 54, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.03.005.

  23. Du, X., Feng, H., & Hennessy, D. A. (2016). Rationality of choices in subsidized crop insurance markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(3), 732–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw035.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Duden, C., & Offermann, F. (2020). Income risk of German farms and its drivers. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.30430/69.2020.2.85‐107.

  25. Dumm, R. E., Eckles, D. L., Nyce, C., & Volkman‐Wise, J. (2017). Demand for windstorm insurance coverage and the representative heuristic. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 42(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/s10713‐017‐0021‐8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Dumm, R. E., Eckles, D. L., Nyce, C., & Volkman‐Wise, J. (2020). The representative heuristic and catastrophe‐related risk behaviors. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 60, 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166‐020‐09324‐7.

  27. Eisele, M., Troost, C., & Berger, T. (2021). How Bayesian are farmers when making climate adaptation decisions? A computer laboratory experiment for parameterising models of expectation formation. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3), 805–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12425.

  28. European Commission (2018). Agricultural and farm income. Retrieved from the European Commission on August 18, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food‐farming‐fisheries/farming/documents/agricultural‐farm‐income_en.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2019). Statistisches Jahrbuch über Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2019. Retrieved from the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture on August 18, 2021. https://www.bmel‐statistik.de/archiv/statistisches‐jahrbuch/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Fehr‐Duda, H., & Epper, T. (2012). Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probability‐dependent risk preferences. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‐economics‐080511‐110950.

  31. Feng, H., Du, X., & Hennessy, D. A. (2020). Depressed demand for crop insurance contracts, and a rationale based on third generation Prospect Theory. Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12541.

  32. Fox, C. R., & Hadar, L. (2006). ‘Decisions from Experience’ = sampling error prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgement and Decision Making, 1(2), 159–161.

  33. Freudenreich, H., & Kebede, S. W. (2022). Experience of shocks, household wealth and expectation formation: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 53(5), 756–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12718.

  34. Freudenreich, H., & Mußhoff, O. (2018). Insurance for technology adoption: An experimental evaluation of schemes and subsidies with maize farmers in Mexico. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(1), 96–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12226.

  35. Freudenreich, H., Mußhoff, O., & Wiercinski, B. (2017). The Relationship Between Farmers’ Shock Experiences and Their Uncertainty Preferences – Experimental Evidence From Mexico. University of Göttingen, GlobalFood Discussion Paper No. 92. Retrieved from the University of Göttingen on August 18, 2021. https://www.uni‐goettingen.de/de/213486.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Genius, M., Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2014). Information transmission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion: Social learning, extension services, and spatial effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat054.

  37. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756‐8765.2008.01006.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‐psych‐120709‐145346.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Glauber, J. W. (2004). Crop insurance reconsidered. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5), 1179–1195.

  41. Harrison, G. W. (2007). Making choice studies incentive compatible. In I. J., Bateman, & B. J., Kanninen (Eds.), The Economics of Non‐Market Goods and Resources (Vol. 8, pp. 67–110). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1‐4020‐5313‐4_4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Harrison, G. W. (2008). Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Utility Functions Using Stata. University of Central Florida, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, Working Paper 06‐12. Retrieved on August 18, 2021. http://faculty.cbpp.uaa.alaska.edu/jalevy/protected/HarrisonSTATML.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051043004577.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In J. C. Cox, & G. W. Harrison (Eds.), Research in Experimental Economics (Vol. 12, pp. 41–196). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193‐2306(08)00003‐3.

  45. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956‐7976.2004.00715.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Hey, J. D., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326.

  47. Hou, L., Liu, P., Huang, J., & Deng, X. (2020). The influence of risk preferences, knowledge, land consolidation, and landscape diversification on pesticide use. Agricultural Economics, 51(5), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12590.

  48. Ingram, J., Chiswell, H., Mills, J., Debruyne, L., Cooreman, H., Koutsouris, A., Alexopoulosc, Y., Pappa, E., & Marchand, F. (2021). Situating demonstrations within contemporary agricultural advisory contexts: analysis of demonstration programmes in Europe. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(5), 615–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1932534.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. IPCC (2019). Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Retrieved from IPCC on August 18, 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2020/02/SRCCL‐Complete‐BOOK‐LRES.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Iyer, P., Bozzola, M., Hirsch, S., Meraner, M., & Finger, R. (2020). Measuring farmer risk preferences in Europe: A systematic review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12325.

  51. Just, R. E., & Pope, R. D. (2003). Agricultural risk analysis: Adequacy of models, data, and issues. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(5), 1249–1256.

  52. Just, R. E., Zilberman, D., Hochman, E., & Bar‐Shira, Z. (1990). Input allocation in multicrop systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(1), 200–209.

  53. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.

  54. Kahneman, D. (2011). Think, Fast and Slow. Farrar Straus and Giroux.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

  56. Kaufmann, C., Weber, M., & Haisley, E. (2013). The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one's investment risk appetite. Management Science, 59(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1607.

  57. Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539‐6924.2006.00773.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Kliger, D., & Kudryavtsev, A. (2010). The availability heuristic and investors' reaction to company‐specific events. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427561003591116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12, 171–187.

  60. Kunreuther, H. (2021). Improving the national flood insurance program. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.26.

  61. Kunreuther, H., & Michel‐Kerjan, E. (2015). Demand for fixed‐price multi‐year contracts: Experimental evidence from insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166‐015‐9225‐4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Kunreuther, H., & Pauly, M. (2004). Neglecting disaster: Why don't people insure against large losses? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(1), 5–21.

  63. Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. V., & McMorrow, S. (2013). Insurance and Behavioral Economics: Improving Decisions in the Most Misunderstood Industry. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139050319.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Läpple, D., & Kelley, H. (2015). Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 42(2), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu024.

  65. Li, J.‐ Z., Li, S., Wang, W.‐ Z., Rao, L.‐ L., & Liu, H. (2011). Are people always more risk averse after disasters? Surveys after a heavy snow‐hit and a major earthquake in China in 2008. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1648.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Maertens, A. (2017). Who cares what others think (or Do)? Social learning and social pressures in cotton farming in India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(4), 988–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw098.

  67. Magnan, N., Love, A. M., Mishili, F. J., & Sheremenko, G. (2020). Husbands’ and wives’ risk preferences and improved maize adoption in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics, 51(5), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12589.

  68. Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123.

  69. Menapace, L., Colson, G., & Raffaelli, R. (2016). A comparison of hypothetical risk attitude elicitation instruments for explaining farmer crop insurance purchases. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv013.

  70. Meraner, M., & Finger, R. (2019). Risk perceptions, preferences and management strategies: Evidence from a case study using German livestock farmers. Journal of Risk Research, 22(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351476.

  71. Meyer, R., & Kunreuther, H. (2017). The Ostrich Paradox: Why We Underprepare for Disasters. Wharton Digital Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Miglietta, P. P., Porrini, D., Fusco, G., & Capitanio, F. (2021). Crowding out agricultural insurance and the subsidy system in Italy: Empirical evidence of the charity hazard phenomenon. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR‐04‐2020‐0061.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.013.

  74. Mullainathan, S. (2002). A memory‐based model of bounded rationality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 735–774. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193887.

  75. Murray‐Prior, R. B., & Wright, V. E. (2001). Influence of strategies and heuristics on farmers' response to change under uncertainty. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(4), 573–598.

  76. Nielsen, T., Keil, A., & Zeller, M. (2013). Assessing farmers’ risk preferences and their determinants in a marginal upland area of Vietnam: A comparison of multiple elicitation techniques. Agricultural Economics, 44(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12009.

  77. Nikolaeva, R. (2014). Interorganizational imitation heuristics arising from cognitive frames. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1758–1765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.001.

  78. Nofsinger, J. R., & Varma, A. (2013). Availability, recency, and sophistication in the repurchasing behavior of retail investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2572–2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.023.

  79. OECD (2009). Managing Risk in Agriculture: A Holistic Approach. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264075313‐en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. OECD (2020). Agricultural support estimates (Edition 2020). Retrieved from the OECD on August 18, 2021. https://www.oecd‐ilibrary.org/agriculture‐and‐food/data/oecd‐agriculture‐statistics_agr‐data‐en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. OECD (2021). Design Principles for Agricultural Risk Management Policies. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 157. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1048819f‐en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Offerman, T., & Sonnemans, J. (1998). Learning by experience and learning by imitating successful others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167‐2681(97)00109‐1.

  83. Öhlmér, B. (1998). Understanding farmers' decision making processes and improving managerial assistance. Agricultural Economics, 18(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169‐5150(97)00052‐2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Ortega, D. L., & Ward, P. S. (2016). Information processing strategies and framing effects in developing country choice experiments: Results from rice farmers in India. Agricultural Economics, 47(5), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12249.

  85. Pachur, T., Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2017). How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice. Cognitive Psychology, 93, 44–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.01.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Penn, J. M., & Hu, W. (2018). Understanding hypothetical bias: An enhanced meta‐analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay021.

  87. Reynaud, A., & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, 73(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238‐012‐9296‐5.

  88. Robinson, P. J., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2018). The impact of regret and worry on the threshold level of concern for flood insurance demand: Evidence from Dutch homeowners. Judgement and Decision Making, 13(3), 237–245.

  89. Robinson, P. J., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2020). Flood insurance demand and probability weighting: The influences of regret, worry, locus of control and the threshold of concern heuristic. Water Resources and Economics, 30, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2019.100144.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition. Free Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Rommel, J., Hermann, D., Müller, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2019). Contextual framing and monetary incentives in field experiments on risk preferences: Evidence from German farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12298.

  92. Sagemüller, F., & Mußhoff, O. (2020). Effects of household shocks on risk preferences and loss aversion: Evidence from upland smallholders of south east asia. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(11), 2061–2078. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1736280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Said, F., Afzal, U., & Turner, G. (2015). Risk taking and risk learning after a rare event: Evidence from a field experiment in Pakistan. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.001.

  94. Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort‐reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐2909.134.2.207.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision‐making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 473–516.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.

  97. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Corrigan, B., & Combs, B. (1977). Preference for insuring against probable small losses: Insurance implications. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 44(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/252136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Smith, V. L. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66(2), 247–279.

  99. Sutherland, L.‐ A., Burton, R. J. F., Ingram, J., Blackstock, K., Slee, B., & Gotts, N. (2012). Triggering change: Towards a conceptualisation of major change processes in farm decision‐making. Journal of Environmental Management, 104, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Takahashi, K., Mano, Y., & Otsuka, K. (2019). Learning from experts and peer farmers about rice production: Experimental evidence from Cote d'Ivoire. World Development, 122, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.004.

  101. Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 100(1), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.557.

  102. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Thomas, F., Midler, E., Lefebvre, M., & Engel, S. (2019). Greening the common agricultural policy: A behavioural perspective and lab‐in‐the‐field experiment in Germany. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Thoyer, S., & Préget, R. (2019). Enriching the CAP evaluation toolbox with experimental approaches: Introduction to the special issue. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz024.

  105. Tirkaso, W., & Hailu, A. (2022). Does neighborhood matter? Spatial proximity and farmers’ technical efficiency. Agricultural Economics, 53(3), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12702.

  106. Top Agrar. (2020). top Spezial Risikovorsorge. Top Agrar, 2020(5).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  107. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Believe in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

  110. Villacis, A. H., Alwang, J. R., & Barrera, V. (2021). Linking risk preferences and risk perceptions of climate change: A prospect theory approach. Agricultural Economics, 52(5), 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12659.

  111. Volkman‐Wise, J. (2015). Representativeness and managing catastrophe risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166‐015‐9230‐7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  112. Vollmer, E., Hermann, D., & Mußhoff, O. (2019). The disposition effect in farmers’ selling behavior: An experimental investigation. Agricultural Economics, 104(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12475.

  113. Wachenheim, C. J., Lim, S. H., Roberts, D. C., & Devney, J. (2019). Landowner valuation of a working wetlands program in the Prairie Pothole Region. Agricultural Economics, 50(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12503.

  114. Webber, H., Lischeid, G., Sommer, M., Finger, R., Nendel, C., Gaiser, T., & Ewert, F. (2020). No perfect storm for crop yield failure in Germany. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748‐9326/aba2a4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Zeisberger, S., Vrecko, D., & Langer, T. (2012). Measuring the time stability of prospect theory preferences. Theory and Decision, 72(3), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238‐010‐9234‐3.

  116. Zhao, S., & Yue, C. (2020). Risk preferences of commodity crop producers and specialty crop producers: An application of prospect theory. Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12559.

  117. Zilberman, D., Zhao, J., & Heiman, A. (2012). Adoption versus adaptation, with emphasis on climate change. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‐resource‐083110‐115954.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does the threat of overthrow discipline the elites? Evidence from a laboratory experiment. (2022). Kurschilgen, Michael ; Hippel, Svenja ; Chatziathanasiou, Konstantin.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2020_27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Non-monetary incentives for sustainable biomass harvest: An experimental approach.. (2021). Attallah, May ; Abildtrup, Jens ; Stenger, Anne.
    In: Working Papers of BETA.
    RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2021-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Experiments on the Fly. (2021). Sadiraj, Vjollca ; Alm, James ; Alekseev, Aleksandr ; Sjoquist, David L.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tul:wpaper:2113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Comparing risk elicitation in lotteries with visual or contextual framing aids. (2021). Espinosa, Maria Paz ; Estepa-Mohedano, Lorenzo.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:108440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Self-regulation and governmental oversight: a theoretical and experimental study. (2021). Van Koten, Silvester.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:59:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11149-020-09421-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Coordinating expectations through central bank projections. (2021). Petersen, Luba ; Mokhtarzadeh, Fatemeh.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:24:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-020-09684-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Asymmetric punishment, Leniency and Harassment Bribes in China: a selective survey. (2021). Hu, Jun.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03119491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Labor market choices of migrants and redistributive policies. (2021). Palan, Stefan ; Mitterbacher, Kerstin ; Flei, Jrgen.
    In: Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences.
    RePEc:grz:wpsses:2021-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Central Bank Transparency with (semi-)public Information: Laboratory Experiments. (2021). trabelsi, emna ; Hichri, Walid.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:90:y:2021:i:c:s2214804320306881.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Experiments on the fly. (2021). Sadiraj, Vjollca ; Alm, James ; Alekseev, Aleksandr ; Sjoquist, David L.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:288-305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Efficient Institutions and Effective Deterrence: On Timing and Uncertainty of Formal Sanctions. (2021). Dimant, Eugen ; Buckenmaier, Johannes ; Schmidt, Ulrich ; Posten, Ann-Christin.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Incentivizing organ donation by swearing an oath: The role of signature and ritual. (2020). Niu, Xiaofei ; Li, Jianbiao.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:203243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. On pledging ones trustworthiness through gifts: an experimental inquiry. (2020). Mittone, Luigi ; Danese, Giuseppe.
    In: CEEL Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpce:2001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Vote and voice: an experiment on the effects of inclusive governance rules. (2020). Zizzo, Daniel ; hargreaves heap, shaun ; Tsutsui, Kei.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:54:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s00355-019-01214-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. On the strategic value of ‘shooting yourself in the foot’: an experimental study of burning money. (2020). Krol, Michal.
    In: International Journal of Game Theory.
    RePEc:spr:jogath:v:49:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s00182-019-00673-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Bad bankers no more? Truth-telling and (dis)honesty in the finance industry. (2020). Huber, Christoph.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:b5682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Empathy and socially responsible consumption: an experiment with the vote-with-the-wallet game. (2020). Pelligra, Vittorio ; Vasquez, Alejandra.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:89:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-020-09756-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. That’s the ticket: explicit lottery randomisation and learning in Tullock contests. (2020). Turocy, Theodore ; Chowdhury, Subhasish ; Mukherjee, Anwesha.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:88:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-019-09731-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The effect of incentive structure on search in the secretary problem. (2020). Hsiao, Yu-Chin ; Kemp, Simon.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:82-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Bad bankers no more? Truth-telling and (dis)honesty in the finance industry. (2020). Huber, Christoph.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2020-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Mean Service Metrics: Biased Quality Judgment and the Customer–Server Quality Gap. (2020). Batt, Robert J ; Tong, Jordan D.
    In: Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.
    RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:5:p:975-995.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Experiments on the Fly. (2020). Sjoquist, David ; Sadiraj, Vjollca ; Alm, James ; Alekseev, Aleksandr.
    In: Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:exc:wpaper:2020-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Bad bankers no more? Truth-telling and (dis)honesty in the finance industry. (2020). Huber, Christoph.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:180:y:2020:i:c:p:472-493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Corruption and competition among bureaucrats: An experimental study. (2020). Serra, Danila ; Ryvkin, Dmitry.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:175:y:2020:i:c:p:439-451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty. (2020). Dimant, Eugen ; Shalvi, Shaul ; van Kleef, Gerben A.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:172:y:2020:i:c:p:247-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Framing and repeated competition. (2020). Masiliūnas, Aidas ; Nax, Heinrich H ; Masilinas, Aidas.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:124:y:2020:i:c:p:604-619.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining. (2020). Veszteg, Róbert ; Navarro, Noemí.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:121:y:2020:i:c:p:117-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Whistleblower protection: Theory and experimental evidence. (2020). Roider, Andreas ; Mechtenberg, Lydia ; Muehlheusser, Gerd.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:126:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120300799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments. (2020). Cerroni, Simone.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:51:y:2020:i:5:p:707-724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Do rights to resistance discipline the elites? An experiment on the threat of overthrow. (2020). Kurschilgen, Michael ; Hippel, Svenja ; Chatziathanasiou, Konstantin.
    In: Munich Papers in Political Economy.
    RePEc:aiw:wpaper:08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The power of words in a petty corruption experiment. (2019). Nardi, Chiara ; Levati, Maria.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ver:wpaper:18/2019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. On the Importance of Context in Sequential Search. (2019). Servátka, Maroš ; Hsiao, Yu Chin ; Kemp, Simon.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:97284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. On the Importance of Context in Sequential Decision-Making. (2019). Servátka, Maroš ; Hsiao, Yu Chin ; Kemp, Simon.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:94027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Experiments in macroeconomics: methods and applications. (2019). Heinemann, Frank ; Cornand, Camille.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01809937.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Greening the common agricultural policy: a behavioural perspective and lab-in-the-field experiment in Germany. (2019). Lefebvre, Marianne ; Midler, Estelle ; Engel, Stefanie ; Thomas, Fabian.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02519104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Rent extraction and prosocial behavior. (2019). Glogowsky, Ulrich ; Cagala, Tobias ; Grimm, Veronika ; Rincke, Johannes ; Tuset-Cueva, Amanda.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:166:y:2019:i:c:p:709-723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Preferences, Uncertainty, and Biases in Land Division: A Bargaining Experiment in the Field. (2019). Mantilla, César ; Gafaro, Margarita.
    In: Documentos de trabajo - Alianza EFI.
    RePEc:col:000561:018983.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Rent Extraction and Prosocial Behavior. (2019). Glogowsky, Ulrich ; Cagala, Tobias ; Grimm, Veronika ; Rincke, Johannes ; Tuset-Cueva, Amanda.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Preferences, Uncertainty, and Biases in Land Division: A Bargaining Experiment in the Field. (2019). Mantilla, César ; Gafaro, Margarita.
    In: Borradores de Economia.
    RePEc:bdr:borrec:1092.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Instructions. (2018). Kimbrough, Erik ; Freeman, David ; Tong, Hanh T ; Petersen, Garrett M.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:4:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-018-0059-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Experiments on macroeconomics: methods and applications. (2018). Heinemann, Frank ; Cornand, Camille.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01809937.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Experiments on macroeconomics: methods and applications. (2018). Heinemann, Frank ; Cornand, Camille.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:1810.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Experimental insights on the investment behavior of small-scale coffee farmers in central Uganda under risk and uncertainty. (2018). Musshoff, Oliver ; Ihli, Hanna Julia ; Gassner, Anja.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:31-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation. (2018). Musshoff, Oliver ; Finger, Robert ; Meraner, Manuela.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:22-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Plastic surgery or primary care? Altruistic preferences and expected specialty choice of U.S. medical students. (2018). Li, Jing.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:62:y:2018:i:c:p:45-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Risk‐taking in vaccination, surgery, and gambling environments: Evidence from a framed laboratory experiment. (2017). Nuscheler, Robert ; Binder, Simon.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:s3:p:76-96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Crowdfunding public goods: An experiment. (2017). van Soest, Daan ; Hauck, Dominic ; Bouma, Jetske ; Ansink, Erik ; Koetse, Mark.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Whistle-Blower Protection: Theory and Experimental Evidence. (2017). Roider, Andreas ; Mechtenberg, Lydia ; Muehlheusser, Gerd.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10607.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Whistle-Blower Protection: Theory and Experimental Evidence. (2017). Roider, Andreas ; Mechtenberg, Lydia ; Muehlheusser, Gerd.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11898.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Whistle-Blower Protection: Theory and Experimental Evidence. (2017). Roider, Andreas ; Mechtenberg, Lydia ; Muhlheusser, Gerd.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6394.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 06:27:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.