create a website

Better service delivery, more satisfied citizens? The mediating effects of local government management capacity in South Korea. (2021). Shin, Geiguen ; Jhee, Byongkuen.
In: Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies.
RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:42-67.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 119

References cited by this document

Cocites: 32

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Evaluating the environmental impacts of Chinese decentralization policies toward SDG 13. (2025). Yousaf, Tahir ; Shahzad, Muhammad Faisal ; Ul, Qurat.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:939-956.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Environmental impact of fiscal decentralization, green technology innovation and institution€™s efficiency in developed countries using advance panel modelling. (2023). Rani, Tayyaba ; Wang, Feng ; Razzaq, Asif.
    In: Energy & Environment.
    RePEc:sae:engenv:v:34:y:2023:i:4:p:1006-1030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Local politics for democratic quality and depth: Lessons from South Korea. (2021). Yap, Fiona O.
    In: Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies.
    RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:5-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Ahmad, E., Dreze, J., Hills, J., & Sen, A. (1991). Social security in developing countries. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198233008.001.0001.

  3. Akai, N., & Sakata, M. (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state‐level cross‐section data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094‐1190(02)00018‐9.

  4. Andrews, R., & Van de Walle, S. (2013). New public management and citizens' perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness. Public Management Review, 15(5), 762–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.725757.

  5. Anton, T. J. (1989). American federalism and public policy: How the system works. Random House.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Aoki, N., & Schroeder, L. (2014). An approach to measuring subnational administrative autonomy in education. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(10), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.809588.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Ariely, G. (2013). Public administration and citizen satisfaction with democracy: Cross‐national evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501432.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Aznar, O. A., Kähkönen, S., Lanyi, A., Meagher, P., & Rutherford, D. (2004). Decentralization, governance, and public services: The impact of institutional arrangements. In M. S. Kimenyi & P. Meagher (Eds.), Devolution and development (pp. 19–62). Ashgate.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Bae, K. B., & Kim, S. (2019). The effect of decentralization on economic growth in Korea: The role of the implementation of local autonomy. Lex Localis‐Journal of Local Self‐Government, 17(4), 985–999.

  10. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐2909.107.2.238.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305‐750X(99)00109‐6.

  12. Bossert, T. (1998). Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: Decision space, innovation and performance. Social Science and Medicine, 47(1), 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277‐9536(98)00234‐2.

  13. Bossert, T., & Beauvais, J. (2002). Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: A comparative analysis of decision space. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/17.1.14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Case, A., Hines, J., & Rosen, H. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047‐2727(93)90036‐S.

  15. Cho, Y. (2014). Appraising the quality of democracy as a developmental phenomenon: How South Koreans appraise the quality of their democracy. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205‐013‐0311‐1.

  16. Choi, Y. C. (2013). Measuring decentralization and analyzing its relationships with associated variables using structural equation model: Centered on fiscal decentralization. Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 17(2), 369–389.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Coggburn, J. D., & Schneider, S. K. (2003). The quality of management and government performance: An empirical analysis of the American states. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540‐6210.00280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and democracy. Stanford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Davoodi, H., & Zou, H.‐F. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross‐country study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2042.

  21. DeHoog, R. H., Lowery, D., & Lyons, W. E. (1990). Citizen satisfaction with local governance: A test of individual, jurisdictional, and city‐specific explanations. Journal of Politics, 52(3), 807–837. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131828.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Diaz‐Serrano, L., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2015). Decentralization and the welfare state: What do citizens perceive? Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205‐014‐0599‐5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Dincer, O. C. (2010). Fiscal decentralization and trust. Public Finance Review, 38(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142109358706.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Donovan, T., & Bowler, S. (2004). Reforming the republic: Democratic institutions for the new America. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Drabenstott, M. (2005). A review of the federal role in regional economic development. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

  26. Elander, I., & Montin, S. (1990). Decentralization and control: Central‐local government relations in Sweden. Policy and Politics, 18(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557390782454512.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Elazar, D. J. (2004). Opening cybernetic frontiers. Transaction Publishers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Ellis, K. (2011). Street‐level bureaucracy revisited: The changing face of frontline discretion in adult social care in England. Social Policy & Administration, 45(3), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9515.2011.00766.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Escobar‐Lemmon, M., & Ross, A. S. (2014). Does decentralization improve perceptions of accountability? Attitudinal evidence from Colombia. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12043.

  30. Faguet, J.‐P., & Sanchez, F. (2008). Decentralization's effects on educational outcomes in Bolivia and Columbia. World Development, 36(7), 1294–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.021.

  31. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Addison‐Wesley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Gaster, L. (1991). Quality and decentralization: Are they connected? Policy & Politics, 19(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557391782454142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Ghuman, B. S., & Singh, R. (2013). Decentralization and delivery of public services in Asia. Policy and Society, 32, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.02.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Grossman, S. A. (2008). The case of business improvement districts: Special district public‐private cooperation in community revitalization. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530‐9576320206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Habibi, N., Huang, C., Miranda, D., Murillo, V., Ranis, G., Sarkar, M., & Stewart, F. (2003). Decentralization and human development in Argentina. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 4(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464988032000051496.

  36. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Han, S.‐J., & Shim, Y.‐H. (2018). The global economic crisis, dual polarization, and liberal in South Korea. Historical Social Research, 43(4), 274–299.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Hansen, S. W. (2015). The democratic costs of size: How increasing size affects citizen satisfaction with local government. Political Studies, 63(2), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‐9248.12096.

  39. Hetherington, M. J. (1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote, 1968–1996. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585398.

  40. Hicken, A., & Simons, J. W. (2008). The personal vote and the efficacy of education spending. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‐5907.2007.00302.x.

  41. Hjortskov, M. (2019). Citizen expectations and satisfaction over time: Findings from a large sample panel survey of public school parents in Denmark. American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018765822.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Ho, A. T. (2007). Exploring the roles of citizens in performance measurement. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701225341.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082‐989X.3.4.424.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Im, T., & Lee, S. J. (2012). Does management performance impact citizen satisfaction? American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011408589.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Jacobsen, R., Snyder, J. W., & Saultz, A. (2015). Understanding satisfaction with schools: The role of expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu026.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. James, O. (2009). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 107–123.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Jeong, D. W., Lee, H. J., & Cho, S. K. (2017). Education decentralization, school resources, and student outcomes in Korea. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.12.003.

  48. Jhee, B.‐K. (2016). How do central offices of political parties control local party organizations? Decentralization of major parties in Korea. Journal of Parliamentary Research, 11(2), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.18808/jopr.2016.2.7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kampen, J. K., Van De Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2006). Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(4), 387–404.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Kiewiet, D. R., & McCubbins, M. D. (1991). The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. University of Chicago Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Kikuchi, M. (2008). Assessing government efforts to (re)build trust in government: Challenges and lessons learned from Japanese experiences. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732‐1317(08)17011‐7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Kim, B. (2002). Local government reform in Korea: Critical issues and prospects. Kyonggi Research Institute, South Korea.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Kim, H. K. (2005). Alternative regional development based on decentralization and innovation. 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government. Retrieved from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.572.5688&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Kim, J. (2013). Political decentralization, subnational political capital, and intergovernmental transfers in Korea. American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012436600.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Kim, N.‐H. (2019). Performances and meanings of financial decentralization. Regional Tax Forum, 43, 72–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Kim, S. (2010). Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review, 70(5), 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‐6210.2010.02207.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Kim, Y. (2010). Stimulating entrepreneurial practices in the public sector: The roles of organizational characteristics. Administration & Society, 42(7), 780–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710377432.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Koo, J., & Kim, B. J. (2018). Two faces of decentralization in South Korea. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS‐11‐2017‐0115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Kristiansen, S., & Pratikno. (2006). Decentralizing education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 26, 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.12.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Kwon, O. (2003). The effects of fiscal decentralization on public spending: The Korean case. Public Budgeting & Finance, 23(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0275‐1100.2003.02304001.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Lim, S. (2018). Decentralization through party decentralization in Korea: Party message, political and fiscal decentralization. Korea and World Politics, 34(1), 109–140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street‐level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Ma, L. (2017). Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 95(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Maister, D. H. (1995). The psychology of waiting lines. In J. A. Czepiel, M. R. Solomon, & C. F. Suprenant (Eds.), The service encounter: Managing employee‐customer interaction in service business. Lexington Books.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0‐8213‐4470‐6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Markusen, A., & Glasmeier, A. (2008). Overhauling and revitalizing federal economic development programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408314281.

  68. Meier, K. J., & O'Toole, L. J. (2009). I've seen fire and I've seen rain: Public management and performance after a natural disaster. Administration & Society, 41(8), 979–1003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal‐agent models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Mitchell, A., & Bossert, T. J. (2010). Decentralisation, governance and health‐system performance: Where you stand depends on where you sit. Development Policy Review, 28(6), 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐7679.2010.00504.x.

  71. Morozov, B. (2018). Decentralization and economic growth: Specification, measurement, and direction of causal relationship. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(9), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1296864.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Nicholson‐Crotty, S. (2008). Fiscal federalism and tax effort in the United States. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 8(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000800800201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizen: Global support for democratic government. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.001.0001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. O'Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2010). In defense of bureaucracy: Public managerial capacity, slack and the dampening of environmental shocks. Public Management Review, 12(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030903286599.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Oates, W. E. (2005). Searching for leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review, 75, 748–757.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Ostrom, E., Schroeder, L., & Wynne, S. (1993). Institutional incentives and sustainable development: Infrastructure policies in perspective. Westview Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Page, E. C., & Goldsmith, M. (1987). Central and local government relations: A comparative analysis of Western European unitary states. Sage Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Park, S., Park, M., & Nam, K. (2019). Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: The case of South Korea. The Annals of Regional Science, 63, 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168‐019‐00936‐9.

  80. Peterson, P. E. (1995). The price of federalism. University of Chicago Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Petrovsky, N., Mok, J. Y., & León‐Cázares, F. (2017). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: A test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review, 77, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12623.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Pickvance, C. G. (1997). Decentralization and democracy in Eastern Europe: A sceptical approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1068/c150129.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  83. Ponce‐Rodríguez, R. A., Hankla, C. R., Martinez‐Vazquez, J., & Heredia‐Ortiz, E. (2018). Rethinking the political economy of decentralization: How elections and parties shape the provision of local public goods. Publius, 48(4), 523–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy003.

  84. Prud'Homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/10.2.201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Rice, D. (2012). Street‐level bureaucrats and the welfare state: Toward a micro‐institutionalist theory of policy implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9), 1038–1062.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Roch, C. H., & Poister, T. H. (2006). Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction: The influence of expectation. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405281124.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Rodden, J., & Rose‐Ackerman, S. (1997). Does federalism preserve markets? Virginia Law Review, 83(7), 1521–1572. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073767.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Rodden, J., & Wibbels, E. (2002). Beyond the fiction of federalism: Macroeconomic management in multi‐tiered systems. World Politics, 54(4), 494–531. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2002.0016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  89. Rodden, J., Eskeland, G., & Litvack, J. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraint. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3021.001.0001.

  90. Rodríguez‐Pose, A., & Krøijer, A. (2009). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐2257.2009.00488.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Rowles, L. S. III, Alcalde, R., Bogolasky, F., Kum, S., Diaz‐Arriaga, F. A., Ayres, C., … Saleh, N. B. (2018). Perceived versus actual water quality: Community studies in rural Oaxaca, Mexico. Science of the Total Environment, 622–623(1), 626–634.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  92. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi‐square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.

  93. Schedler, A. (1998). What is democratic consolidation? Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0030.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Schneider, A. (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Shin, G. (2018). Corporate tax policy and multinational corporations in the American states: Exploring the intervening effect of local fiscal decentralization. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(5), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360728.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Shin, G. (2019). Welfare, innovation capacity, and economic performance: Evidence from American federalism. Public Policy and Administration, 34(3), 349–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718796104.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Shin, G., & Hall, L. J. (2018). Exploring the influence of federal welfare expenditures on state‐level new economy development performance: Drawing from the diffusion of innovation theory. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242418778115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  98. Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703.

  99. Stansel, D. (2005). Local decentralization and local economic growth: A cross‐sectional examination of U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.08.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Stipak, B. (1977). Attitudes and belief systems concerning urban services. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/268351.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Tanzi, V. (1995). Taxation in an integrating world. The Brookings Institution.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  102. Thiessen, U. (2000). Fiscal federalism in Western European and selected other countries: Centralization or decentralization? What is better for economic growth?. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschanftsforschung.

  103. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw‐Hill.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  104. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839.

  105. Treisman, D. (1999). Political decentralization and economic reform: A game theoretical analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 488–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991803.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested games: Rational choice in comparative politics. University of California Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  107. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170.

  108. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui058.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  109. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21702.

  110. Von Hagen, J, Bordignon, M., Dahlberg, M., Grewal, B., Petterson, P., & Seitz, H. (2000). Subnational government bailouts in OECD countries: Four case studies. Inter‐American Development Bank Working Paper R‐399.

  111. Walker, R. M., Brewer, G. A., Boyne, G. A., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2011). Market orientation and public service performance: New public management gone mad? Public Administration Review, 71(5), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‐6210.2011.02410.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  112. Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq043.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Werts, C., Linn, R., & Jöreskog, K. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400104.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  114. Wibbels, E. (2000). Federalism and the politics of macroeconomic policy and performance. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  116. Xie, D., Zou, H.‐F., & Davoodi, H. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2095.

  117. Yap, O. F. (2006). Agenda control, intraparty conflict, and government spending in Asia: Evidence from South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of East Asian Studies, 6(1), 69–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800000047.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  118. Yap, O. F. (2019). How political trust matters in emergent democracies: Evidence from East and Southeast Asia. Journal of Public Policy, 39(2), 295–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1800003X.

  119. Yoo, J. (2018). Assessing central‐local government relations in contemporary South Korea: An application of Page & Goldsmith's comparative framework. Journal of Local Self‐Government, 16(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.4335/16.3.505‐528(2018).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Inequality, social protection policy, and inclusion: pertinent theories and empirical evidence. (2022). Woldegiorgis, Mesfin.
    In: Journal of Social and Economic Development.
    RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s40847-022-00185-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Global ideas of welfare and the narrowing scope of social policy. (2022). Chukwuma, Julia Ngozi.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:soa:wpaper:252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Impacts of Bolsa Familia Program on multidimensional poverty. (2022). Ciula, Raffaele.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:115752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Better service delivery, more satisfied citizens? The mediating effects of local government management capacity in South Korea. (2021). Shin, Geiguen ; Jhee, Byongkuen.
    In: Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies.
    RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:42-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do Public Program Benefits Crowd Out Private Transfers in Developing Countries? A Critical Review of Recent Evidence. (2020). Nikolov, Plamen ; Bonci, Matthew.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Do Public Program Benefits Crowd Out Private Transfers in Developing Countries? A Critical Review of Recent Evidence. (2020). Nikolov, Plamen ; Bonci, Matthew.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13081.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Do Public Program Benefits Crowd Out Private Transfers in Developing Countries? A Critical Review of Recent Evidence. (2020). Nikolov, Plamen ; Bonci, Matthew.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2020-016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Do public program benefits crowd out private transfers in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence. (2020). Nikolov, Plamen ; Bonci, Matthew.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:134:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x20300930.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Do Public Program Benefits Crowd Out Private Transfers in Developing Countries? A Critical Review of Recent Evidence. (2020). Nikolov, Plamen ; Bonci, Matthew.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2006.00737.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Social protection systems and economic growth. (2020). Ghean, Dorina ; Paierele, Ada.
    In: Theoretical and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:agr:journl:v:3(624):y:2020:i:3(624):p:5-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Exploring the Influence of Federal Welfare Expenditures on State-Level New Economy Development Performance: Drawing From the Diffusion of Innovation Theory. (2018). .
    In: Economic Development Quarterly.
    RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:242-256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Administrative Challenges of WAQF Institution in the Contemporary World: Future Prospects. (2018). Omar, Hydzulkifli Hashim ; Sanyinna, Abubakar Yusuf.
    In: The Journal of Social Sciences Research.
    RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:294-299.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Designing and Evaluating Social Safety Nets: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Conclusions. (2015). Coady, David.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:7496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Financial Protection for the Poor in Malaysia: Role of Zak?h and Micro-takaful ??????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???????: ??? ?????? ???????? ???????. (2012). Rahman, Zuriah Abdul ; Rom, Mohd.
    In: Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics.
    RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:25:y:2012:i:1:no:5:p:119-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Democracy and growth in divided societies: A health-inequality trap?. (2011). Powell-Jackson, Timothy ; Basu, Sanjay ; McKee, Martin ; Balabanova, Dina ; Stuckler, David.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:1:p:33-41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Social Security for Persons with Disabilities in India. (2011). Begum, Mustiary.
    In: Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies.
    RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:158-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Social security in developing countries: MYTH or necessity? Evidence from India. (2007). Justino, Patricia.
    In: Journal of International Development.
    RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:19:y:2007:i:3:p:367-382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Emergence of a New Socialist Market Labour Regime in China. (2006). Schucher, Guenter ; Hebel, Jutta.
    In: GIGA Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:gigawp:39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Karnataka Yeshasvini Health Insurance Scheme: Towards Comprehensive Health Insurance Coverage in Karnataka?. (2006). Kuruvilla, Sarosh ; Jacob, Priti ; Liu, Mingwei.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The impact of collective action on economic development: empirical evidence from Kerala, India. (2006). Justino, Patricia.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:34:y:2006:i:7:p:1254-1270.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Inequality in Latin America: Processes and Inputs. (2003). Justino, Patricia ; Acharya, Arnab.
    In: PRUS Working Papers.
    RePEc:pru:wpaper:22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Impact of Inequality in Latin America. (2003). Litchfield, Julie ; Justino, Patricia ; Whitehead, Laurence.
    In: PRUS Working Papers.
    RePEc:pru:wpaper:21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Social Security in Developing Countries: Myth or Necessity? Evidence from India. (2003). Justino, Patricia.
    In: PRUS Working Papers.
    RePEc:pru:wpaper:20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Social security, economic growth and poverty : theoretical considerations and guidelines for institutional arrangements. (2001). Kock, Udo.
    In: Serie Research Memoranda.
    RePEc:vua:wpaper:2001-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Estimating the elderlys returns on the farm: evidence from Cote dIvoire. (1999). Hamilton, Barton ; Grimard, Franque.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:58:y:1999:i:2:p:513-531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Patterns of Taxation in Latin America and East Asia. (1997). Souza, Maria da Conceição Sampaio de, .
    In: Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE.
    RePEc:fgv:epgrbe:v:51:y:1997:i:4:a:704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM IN CHINA: THE CASE OF OLD‐AGE INSURANCE. (1997). Song, Shunfeng ; GEORGE S-F CHU, .
    In: Contemporary Economic Policy.
    RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:15:y:1997:i:2:p:85-93.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Experience of Indias (Maharashtra) Employment Guarantee Scheme: Lessons for Development Policy. (1996). Dev, Mahendra S.
    In: Development Policy Review.
    RePEc:bla:devpol:v:14:y:1996:i:3:p:227-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Labor Market Insurance and Social Safety Nets in Developing Countries. (1994). .
    In: UCLA Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:cla:uclawp:716.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Social Security in the Asian‐Pacific Region. (1993). Tyabji, Amina.
    In: Asian-Pacific Economic Literature.
    RePEc:bla:apacel:v:7:y:1993:i:1:p:53-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Economic theory and the welfare state : a survey and interpretation. (1992). Barr, Nicholas.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-20 20:15:31 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.