This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abele, S., Stasser, G., & Chartier, C. (2014). Use of social knowledge in tacit coordination: Social focal points. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(1), 23–33.

2. Abramowicz, M. (2001). A compromise approach to compromise verdicts. California Law Review, 89(2), Article 1.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Als‐Ferrer, C., & Kuzmics, C. (2013). Hidden symmetries and focal points. Journal of Economic Theory, 148(1), 226–258.

4. Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. H. (1993). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner's dilemma: Experimental evidence. Economic Journal, 103(418), 570–585.

5. Atallah, G. (2006). Defecting from R&D cooperation. Australian Economic Papers, 45(3), 204–226.

6. Azar, O. H., & Bar‐Eli, M. (2011). Do soccer players play the mixed‐strategy Nash equilibrium? Applied Economics, 43(25), 3591–3601.

7. Bernheim, B., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M. D. (1987). Coalition‐proof Nash equilibria I. concepts. Journal of Economic Theory, 42(1), 1–12.

8. Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2008). Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Bosch‐Domenech, A., & Vriend, N. J. (2013). On the role of non‐equilibrium focal points as coordination devices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 94, 52–67.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Buchholz, W., & Peters, W. (2007). Justifying the Lindahl solution as an outcome of fair cooperation. Public Choice, 133(1), 157–169.

11. Cabon‐Dhersin, M. L., & Etchart‐Vincent, N. (2012). The puzzle of cooperation in a game of chicken: An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 72(1), 65–87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Cabon‐Dhersin, M. L., & Etchart‐Vincent, N. (2013). Cooperation: The power of a single word? Some experimental evidence on wording and gender effects in a game of chicken. Bulletin of Economic Research, 65(1), 43–64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility‐maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383–398.

14. Camera, G., & Casari, M. (2014). The coordination value of monetary exchange: Experimental evidence. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(1), 290–314.

15. Cason, T. N., & Mui, V.‐L. (2014). Coordinating resistance through communication and repeated interaction. Economic Journal, 124(574), 226–256.

16. Chang, Y.‐M., & Sellak, M. (2019). A game‐theoretic analysis of international trade and political conflict over external territories. Public Choice, 179(3), 209–228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Chiappori, P., Levitt, S., & Groseclose, T. (2002). Testing mixed‐strategy equilibria when players are heterogeneous: The case of penalty kicks in soccer. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1138–1151.

18. Christensen, C. M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The new M&A Playbook. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 48‐57.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Christiansen, N., Georganas, S., & Kagel, J. H. (2014). Coalition formation in a legislative voting game. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(1), 182–204.

20. Chuah, S. H., Hoffmann, R., & Larner, J. (2016). Perceived intentionality in 2x2 experimental games. Bulletin of Economic Research, 68(1), 78–84.

21. Coccorese, P., & Ferri, G. (2020). Are mergers among cooperative banks worth a dime? Evidence on efficiency effects of M&As in Italy. Economic Modelling, 84(C), 147–164.

22. Colman, A. M., & Stirk, J. A. (1998). Stackelberg reasoning in mixed‐motive games: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(2), 279–293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Cooper, D. J., & Kuhn, K.‐U. (2014). Communication, renegotiation, and the scope for collusion. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(2), 247–278.

24. Cooper, R., Dejong, D. V., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. W. (1989). Communication in the battle of the sexes game: Some experimental results. The Rand Journal of Economics, 20(4), 568–587.

25. Cooper, R., Dejong, D. V., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. W. (1993). Forward induction in the battle‐of‐the‐sexes games. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1303–1316.

26. Crawford, V. P., & Haller, H. (1990). Learning how to cooperate: Optimal play in repeated coordination games. Econometrica, 58(3), 571–595.

27. Desjardins, M., & Dubois, F. (2015). The hawk‐dove game played between mating partners: Theoretical predictions and experimental results. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69(4), 563–570.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Dixit, A., Grossman G., & Gul, F. (1998). A theory of political compromise. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1935.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Ellison, S. F., & Wolfram, C. (2006). Coordinating on lower prices: Pharmaceutical pricing under political pressure. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(2), 324–340.

30. Engelmann, D., & Nikiforakis, N. (2015). In the long‐run we are all dead: On the benefits of peer punishment in rich environments. Social Choice and Welfare, 45(3), 561–577.

31. Farrell, J. (1987). Cheap talk, coordination, and entry. The Rand Journal of Economics, 18(1), 34–39.

32. Friedman, D., & Oprea, R. (2012). A Continuous Dilemma. The American Economic Review, 102(1), 337–363.

33. Fung, J. M. Y., & Au, W.‐T. (2014). Effect of inequality on cooperation: Heterogeneity and hegemony in public goods dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(1), 9–22.

34. Garcia‐Gallego, A., Hernanez‐Rojas, P., & Rodrigo‐Gonzalez, P. (2019). Efficient coordination in the lab. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 14(1), 175–201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Garratt, R., & Keister, T. (2009). Bank runs as coordination failures: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 300–317.

36. Guanglian, Y. (2016). Leadership and privatisation in a mixed multi‐product oligopoly: An endogenous timing model. Australian Economic Papers, 55(2), 170–180.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Hamilton, J. H., & Slutsky, S. M. (1990). Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior, 2(1), 29–46.

38. Hausken, K. (2007). Stubbornness, power, and equilibrium selection in repeated games with multiple equilibria. Theory and Decision, 62(2), 135–160.

39. He, S., & Wu, J. (2020). Compromise and coordination: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 119, 216–233.

40. Isoni, A., Poulsen, A., Sugden, R., & Tsutsui, K. (2013). Focal points in tacit bargaining problems: Experimental evidence. European Economic Review, 59, 167–188.

41. Iyengar, S. S., & Leeper, M. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Jackson, M. O., & Xing, Y. (2014). Culture‐dependent strategies in coordination games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Suppl 3), 10889–10896.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Janku, J., & Libich, J. (2019). Ignorance Isn't bliss: Uninformed voters drive budget cycles. Journal of Public Economics, 173, 21–43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Kim, Y.‐G., & Sobel, J. (1995). An evolutionary approach to pre‐play communication. Econometrica, 63(5), 1181–1193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Klein, D., & Orsborn, A. (2009). Concatenate coordination and mutual coordination. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 176–187.

46. Knittel, C. R., & Stango, V. (2003). Price ceilings as focal points for tacit collusion: Evidence from credit cards. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1703–1729.

47. Lagunoff, R., & Matsui, A. (1997). Asynchronous choice in repeated coordination games. Econometrica, 65, 1467–1477.

48. Lau, S. H. P., & Mui, V. L. (2008). Using turn taking to mitigate coordination and conflict problems in the repeated battle of the sexes game. Theory and Decision, 65(2), 153–183.

49. Levy, G., & Razin, R. (2012). Religious beliefs, religious participation, and cooperation. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(3), 121–151.

50. Libich, J., & Stehlik, P. (2011). Endogenous monetary commitment. Economics Letters, 112, 103–106.

51. Libich, J., Macháček, M., & Nguyen, D. (2021). Role swap: When the follower leads and the leader follows. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 71(4), 282–305.

52. Lopez‐Perez, R., Pinter, A., & Kiss, H. J. (2015). Does payoff equity facilitate coordination? A test of Schelling's conjecture. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, 209–222.

53. Lord, R. G., Gatti, P., & Chui, S. L. M. (2016). Social‐cognitive, relational, and identity‐based approaches to leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136(C), 119–134.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Lorenzi‐Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193–217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Mahmud, A. S., & Jahan, S. (2012). Who's the boss? Household distribution of power in a non‐cooperative framework. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64, 32–52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Mailath, G., & Samuelson, L. (2006). Repeated games and reputations: Long‐run relationships. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Martinangeli, A., Martinsson, P., & Patel, A. (2017). Coordination via redistribution. SSRN Working Paper No. 2017‐7.

58. Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (1988). A theory of dynamic oligopoly. I: Overview and quantity competition with large fixed costs. Econometrica, 56, 549–569.

59. Matějka, F., & Mckay, A. (2015). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. American Economic Review, 105(1), 272–298.

60. Matsumura, T., & Ogawa, A. (2017). Endogenous timing in mixed duopolies with externality. Australian Economic Papers, 56(4), 304–327.

61. Midler, E., Figuieres, C., & Willinger, M. (2015). Choice overload, coordination and inequality: three hurdles to the effectiveness of the compensation mechanism?. Social Choice and Welfare, 45(3), 513‐535.

62. O'Neil, B. (1987). Nonmetric test of the minimax theory of two‐person zero‐sum games. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences, 84, 2106–2109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Oprea, R., Henwood, K., & Friedman, D. (2011). Separating the hawks from the doves: Evidence from continuous time laboratory games. Journal of Economic Theory, 146(6), 2206–2225.

64. Ortuno‐Ortin, I., & Gerber, A. (1998). Political compromise and endogenous formation of coalitions. Social Choice and Welfare, 15(3), 445–454.

65. Parravano, M., & Poulsen, O. (2015). Stake size and the power of focal points in coordination games: Experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behaviour, 94, 191–199.

66. Pogrebna, G., & Blavatskyy, P. (2009). Coordination, focal points and voting in strategic situations: A natural experiment. Public Choice, 140(1), 125–143.

67. Pope, D., Pope, J., & Sydnor, J. (2015). Focal points and bargaining in the housing markets. Games and Economic Behaviour, 93(C), 89–107.

68. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict (1st ed.). Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
69. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Ecco.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

70. Sepahvand, M., & Cornes, R. C. (2007). Ownership versus timing of the game. Australian Economic Papers, 46(4), 305–314.

71. Shachat, J., & Swarthout, J. T. (2004). Do we detect and exploit mixed strategy play by opponents? Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 59(3), 359–373.

72. Sitzia, S., & Zheng, J. (2019). Group behaviour in tacit coordination games with focal points—An experimental investigation. Games and Economic Behavior, 117, 461–478.

73. Skyrms, B. (2003). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

74. Smith, A., Skarbek, D., & Wilson, B. (2012). Anarchy, groups, and conflict: An experiment on the emergence of protective associations. Social Choice and Welfare, 38(2), 325–353.

75. Sugden, R. (1995). A theory of focal points. The Economic Journal, 105(430), 533–550.

76. Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

77. Tijs, S., & Otten, G. (1993). Compromise values in cooperative game theory. Top, 1(1), 1–36.

78. Tsoukis, C., & Tournemaine, F. (2011). Social conflict, growth and factor shares. Metroeconomica, 62(2), 283–304.

79. Wen, Q. (2002). Repeated games with asynchronous moves. mimeo, Department of Economics Vanderbilt University Working Paper No. 0204.

80. Xu, Q., Fu, G., & Fan, D. (2020). Service sharing, profit mode and coordination mechanism in the online‐to‐offline retail market. Economic Modelling, 91(C), 659–669.

81. Yang, J., Kawamura, T., & Ogawa, K. (2016). Experimental multimarket contact inhibits cooperation. Metroeconomica, 67(1), 21–43.

1. Symmetry in n-player games. (2023). Plan, Asaf.
   In: Journal of Economic Theory.
   RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:207:y:2023:i:c:s0022053122001399.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Communication, Renegotiation and Coordination with Private Values. (2023). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Heller, Yuval.
   In: Papers.
   RePEc:arx:papers:2005.05713.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Comparing theories of one-shot play out of treatment. (2022). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Külpmann, Philipp ; Kulpmann, Philipp.
   In: Journal of Economic Theory.
   RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:205:y:2022:i:c:s0022053122001442.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The value of a coordination game. (2022). Kets, Willemien ; Kager, Wouter ; Sandroni, Alvaro.
   In: Journal of Economic Theory.
   RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:201:y:2022:i:c:s0022053122000096.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Social closeness can help, harm and be irrelevant in solving pure coordination problems. (2022). Tufano, Fabio ; Thöni, Christian ; Starmer, Chris ; Gächter, Simon ; Gachter, Simon ; Thoni, Christian ; Weber, Till O.
   In: Economics Letters.
   RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:216:y:2022:i:c:s0165176522001562.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. When a compromise gets compromised by another compromise. (2022). Nguyen, Dat ; Libich, Jan.
   In: Australian Economic Papers.
   RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:61:y:2022:i:4:p:678-716.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. A notion of prominence for games with natural‐language labels. (2021). Sontuoso, Alessandro ; Bhatia, Sudeep.
   In: Quantitative Economics.
   RePEc:wly:quante:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:283-312.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The Lottery Players Fallacy Why Labels Predict Strategic Choices. (2021). Wolff, Irenaeus.
   In: TWI Research Paper Series.
   RePEc:twi:respas:0124.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Communication, Renegotiation and Coordination with Private Values (Extended Version). (2021). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Heller, Yuval.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:102926.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Social closeness can help, harm and be irrelevant in solving pure coordination problems. (2021). Tufano, Fabio ; Thöni, Christian ; Starmer, Chris ; Gächter, Simon ; Weber, Till O ; Gaechter, Simon.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2021-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Perspective neglect: Inadequate perspective taking limits coordination. (2021). Amir, ON ; Williams, Elanor F ; Lieberman, Alicea.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:898-931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The lottery player’s fallacy: Why labels predict strategic choices. (2021). Wolff, Irenaeus.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:184:y:2021:i:c:p:16-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. A case of evolutionarily stable attainable equilibrium in the laboratory. (2020). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Rodenburger, Daniel.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:70:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00199-019-01224-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. What are the best quorum rules? A laboratory investigation. (2020). Vanberg, Christoph ; Aguiar-Conraria, Luís ; Magalhes, Pedro C.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:185:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-019-00749-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Compromise and coordination: An experimental study. (2020). WU, JIABIN ; He, Simin.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:119:y:2020:i:c:p:216-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Is knowledge curse or blessing in pure coordination problems?. (2019). Hoffmann, Robert ; Chuah, Swee-Hoon ; Larner, Jeremy.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:87:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-019-09692-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. On the Predictive Power of Theories of One-Shot Play. (2019). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Külpmann, Philipp ; Kulpmann, Philipp.
    In: Graz Economics Papers.
    RePEc:grz:wpaper:2019-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The power of sunspots: An experimental analysis. (2019). Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Heinemann, Frank ; Fehr, Dietmar.
    In: Journal of Monetary Economics.
    RePEc:eee:moneco:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:123-136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Efficiency-based measures of inequality. (2019). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Andonie, Costel ; Rogers, Brian W.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:60-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. A case of evolutionary stable attainable equilibrium in the lab. (2018). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Rodenburger, Daniel.
    In: Graz Economics Papers.
    RePEc:grz:wpaper:2018-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Symmetric games revisited. (2018). Cao, Zhigang ; Yang, Xiaoguang.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:9-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Tie-Breaking Power in Committees. (2017). Wagner, Alexander ; Granic, Georg.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc17:168187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Does Focality Depend on the Mode of Cognition? Experimental Evidence on Pure Coordination Games. (2017). Boncinelli, Leonardo ; Bilancini, Ennio ; Luini, Luigi.
    In: Department of Economics University of Siena.
    RePEc:usi:wpaper:771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. On the impact of quotas and decision rules in collective bargaining. (2017). Stephan, Gesine ; Grimm, Veronika ; Feicht, Robert ; Rau, Holger A.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:100:y:2017:i:c:p:175-192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Circulant games. (2016). Grani, Ura-Georg ; Kern, Johannes.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:80:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-014-9478-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Identifying the reasons for coordination failure in a laboratory experiment. (2016). Külpmann, Philipp ; Klpmann, Philipp ; Khantadze, Davit .
    In: Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:bie:wpaper:567.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Efficiency based measures of inequality. (2016). Kuzmics, Christoph ; Andonie, Costel ; Rogers, Brian W..
    In: Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:bie:wpaper:512.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. On the Impact of Quotas and Decision Rules in Ultimatum Collective Bargaining. (2015). Stephan, Gesine ; Grimm, Veronika ; Feicht, Robert ; Rau, Holger A.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Measuring agents’ reaction to private and public information in games with strategic complementarities. (2014). Heinemann, Frank ; Cornand, Camille.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:61-77.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Symmetric play in repeated allocation games. (2014). Palfrey, Thomas ; Kuzmics, Christoph ; Rogers, Brian W..
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:154:y:2014:i:c:p:25-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The power of sunspots: an experimental analysis. (2013). Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Heinemann, Frank ; Fehr, Dietmar.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedbwp:13-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. On the role of non-equilibrium focal points as coordination devices. (2013). Vriend, Nicolaas ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:94:y:2013:i:c:p:52-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 20:33:38 || Missing content? Let us know