create a website

Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development. (2021). Occhipinti, Zeila ; Lazzini, Simone ; Verona, Roberto ; Parenti, Angela.
In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:5:p:2332-2353.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 65

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Does Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Promote Corporate Sustainable Development? A Quasi-Natural Experiment of “10-Point Soil Plan” in China. (2023). Lin, Yu-En ; Zhou, Qiong ; Tan, Qian ; Zhu, Peng ; Zeng, Huixiang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4598-:d:1087621.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Booster or Stumbling Block? The Role of Environmental Regulation in the Coupling Path of Regional Innovation under the Porter Hypothesis. (2022). Wu, Jianxian ; Wei, Zhuxia ; Nie, Xin ; Li, Weijuan ; Wang, Han ; Huang, Chengdao.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2876-:d:762097.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alonso‐Martínez, D., De Marchi, V., & Di Maria, E. (2020). Which country characteristics support corporate social performance? Sustainable Development, 28, 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2006). Can environmental regulations be good for business? An assessment of the Porter hypothesis. Energy Studies Review, 14(2), 42–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22, 45–62.

  4. Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016.

  5. Anderson, B., & Di Maria, C. (2011). Abatement and allocation in the pilot phase of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9399-9.

  6. Anger, N., & Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy, 36(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.007.

  7. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002.

  8. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bel, G., & Joseph, S. (2015). Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis. Energy Economics, 49, 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.014.

  10. Benoit, K. (2011). Linear regression models with logarithmic transformations (Methodology Institute London School of Economics). https://kenbenoit.net/assets/courses/ME104/logmodels2.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Brouwers, R., Schoubben, F., & Van Hulle, C. (2018). The influence of carbon cost pass through on the link between carbon emission and corporate financial performance in the context of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2193.

  12. Burtraw, D. (2000). Innovation under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector (Discussion Paper 00–38). Resources for the Future. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24122635_Innovation_Under_the_Tradable_Sulfur_Dioxide_Emission_Permits_Program_in_the_US_Electricity_Sector.

  13. Cañón‐de‐Francia, J., & Garcés‐Ayerbe, C. (2019). Factors and contingencies for the “it pays to be green hypothesis”. The European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and financial crisis as contexts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2988), 1–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Capece, G., Di Pillo, F., Gastaldi, M., Levialdi, N., & Miliacca, M. (2017). Examining the effect of managing GHG emissions on business performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1041–1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1956.

  15. Chan, H. S. R., Li, S., & Zhang, F. (2013). Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy, 63, 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.032.

  16. Chappin, E. J. L., & Dijkema, G. P. J. (2009). On the impact of CO2 emission‐trading on power generation emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(3), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Pinnuck, M., & Richardson, G. D. (2015). The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.927782.

  19. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 33(4/5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003.

  20. Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.476.

  21. Croissant, Y., & Millo, G. (2008). Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 1–43.

  22. Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2017). Eco‐efficiency: GHG reduction related environmental and economic performance. The Case of the Companies Participating in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 791–806.

  23. Davies, S. (2011). Regional resilience in the 2008‐2010 downturn: Comparative evidence from European countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4, 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsr019.

  24. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.409.

  25. Dixon‐Fowler, H. R., Slater, D. J., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta‐analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Egenhofer, C., Alessi, M., Georgiev, A., & Fujiwara, N. (2011). The EU emissions trading system and climate policy towards 2050: Real incentives to reduce emissions and drive innovation? CEPS Special Reports. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1756736.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. K. (2008). Over‐allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005‐06 emissions data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41, 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9191-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. European Union. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. European Union. (2011). Commission Decision of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union‐wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. European Union. (2018). European Union. Official Web Site. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets_en#tab-0-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. European Union. (2019). European Union. Official Web Site. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets_en#Main_legislation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Evans, A., & Tzavara, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility strategies in the light of the financial crisis: The case of Milan‐based global companies. European Journal of International Management, 6(2), 154–174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Filippetti, A., & Archibugi, D. (2011). Innovation in times of crisis: National systems of innovation, structure, and demand. Research Policy, 40(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.001.

  34. Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). Incorporating sustainable business practices into company strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.462.

  35. Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2017). Determinants of regional resilience to economic crisis: A European perspective. European Planning Studies, 25(8), 1394–1415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1319464.

  36. Gillingham, K. T., Knittel, C. R., Li, J., Ovaere, M., & Reguant, M. (2020). The short‐run and long‐run effects of Covid‐19 on energy and the environment. Joule, 4(7), 1337–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Groot, S. P. T., Möhlmann, J. L., Garretsen, J. H., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2011). The crisis sensitivity of European countries and regions: Stylized facts and spatial heterogeneity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4, 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsr024.

  38. GSE. (2018). Rapporto annuale aste di quote europee di emissione 2018. https://www.gse.it/documenti_site/Documenti GSE/Rapporti ASTE CO2/190228_Rapporto_GSE_Aste_ANNUALE_2018_PUBBLICO.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). The McGraw−Hill Companies.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Hamilton, B. H., & Nickerson, J. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127003001001218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199603)5:1%3C30::AID-BSE38%3E3.0.CO;2-Q.

  42. Hoffman, A., & Ventresca, M. (2002). Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Jaraite, J., & Di Maria, C. (2016). Did the EU ETS make a difference? An empirical assessment using Lithuanian firm‐level data. The Energy Journal, 37(1).

  44. Jennings, P., & Zandbergen, P. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280034.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lagravinese, R. (2015). Economic crisis and rising gaps North–South: Evidence from the Italian regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv006.

  46. Majocchi, A., Dalla Valle, L., & D'Angelo, A. (2015). Internationalisation, cultural distance and country characteristics: A Bayesian analysis of SMEs financial performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 307–324.

  47. Marin, G., Marino, M., & Pellegrin, C. (2018). The impact of the European emission trading scheme on multiple measures of economic performance. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71, 551–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0173-0.

  48. Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). The impact of the European Union emissions trading scheme on regulated firms: What is the evidence after ten years? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev016.

  49. Mio, C., Panfilo, S., & Blundo, B. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3320–3345.

  50. Muûls, M., Colmer, J., Martin, R., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). Evaluating the EU Emissions Trading System: Take it or leave it? An assessment of the data after ten years. (No. 21; Briefing Paper). https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/grantham-institute/public/publications/briefing-papers/Evaluating-the-EU-emissions-trading-system_Grantham-BP-21_web.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabic, C., Kerwand, A., Al‐Jabird, A., Iosifidisc, C., … Aghaf, R. (2020). The socio‐economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID‐19): A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Occhipinti, Z., & Verona, R. (2020). Kyoto Protocol (KP). In W. Leal Filho, U. Azeiteiro, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Climate action. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95885-9_23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta‐analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Paroussos, L., Fragkos, P., Capros, P., & Fragkiadakis, K. (2015). Assessment of carbon leakage through the industry channel: The EU perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.011.

  55. Petrick, S., & Wagner, U. J. (2014). The impact of carbon trading on industry: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Kiel Working Paper No. 1912. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2389800.

  56. Porter, M. E. (1991). America's green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2017). Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 79–92.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Segura, S., Ferruz, L., Gargallo, P., & Salvador, M. (2018). Environmental versus economic performance in the EU ETS from the point of view of policy makers: A statistical analysis based on copulas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. The Lancet. (2016). Impact of climate change on food production could cause over 500000 extra deaths in 2050: By 2050, reduced fruit and vegetable intake could cause twice as many deaths as undernutrition. ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160302204506.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Lazzini, A. (2020). Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2373.

  61. UNFCCC. (1992). The United Nations framework convention on climate change. FCC/INFORMAL/84/rev.1 GE.14‐20481 (E).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Venmans, F. M. J. (2016). The effect of allocation above emissions and price uncertainty on abatement investments under the EU ETS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Wagner, U. J., Muûls, M., Martin, R., & Colmer, J. (2014). The causal effects of the European Union emissions trading scheme: Evidence from French manufacturing plants. In Fifth world congress of environmental and resources economists. Turkey: Instanbul. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.642.888%26rep=rep1%26type=pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Wu, X., Nethery, R. C., Sabath, M. B., Braun, D., & Dominici, F. (2020). Air pollution and COVID‐19 mortality in the United States: Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis. Science Advances, 6(45), eabd4049. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4049.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Zhang, Y. J., & Wei, Y. M. (2010). An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Applied Energy, 87, 1804–1814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.12.019.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The link between corporate sustainability and willingness to invest: new evidence from the field of ethical investments. (2022). Lingnau, Volker ; Fuchs, Florian ; Beham, Florian.
    In: Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung.
    RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s00187-022-00340-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Influence of ESGC Indicators on Financial Performance of Listed Pharmaceutical Companies. (2021). Rodriguez-Fernandez, Mercedes ; Benitez-Marquez, Maria Dolores ; Sanchez-Teba, Eva Maria ; Lopez-Toro, Alberto A.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4556-:d:543337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Who cares?—Stakeholder relevance for voluntary environmental management in hospitals. (2020). Guenther, Edeltraud ; Seifert, Christin.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:4:p:1786-1799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Can a firms environmental innovation attract job seekers? Evidence from experiments. (2020). Liao, Zhongju ; Cheng, Jialin.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:542-551.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. (2020). Wang, Yanan ; Jie, Xiaowen ; Zhao, Minjuan ; Qiu, LU.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:146-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The effects of managerial perceptions on CSR practices and corporate financial performance: an evidence from Vietnam. (2020). , Phuong ; Tran, Ngoc M ; Mai, Khuong N.
    In: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues.
    RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:858-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Environmental regulations, enterprise productivity, and green technological progress: large-scale data analysis in China. (2020). Sun, Yuhuan ; Wang, Shuhong ; Du, Juntao.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:290:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03249-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Environmental Leadership, Green Innovation Practices, Environmental Knowledge Learning, and Firm Performance. (2020). Su, Xiaofeng ; Xu, Wenxing ; Lin, Wenhe ; Liu, Songtao ; Chen, Youcheng.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020922909.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Revisiting the sustainability-innovation nexus: Lessons learned from the US. (2020). POLEMIS, MICHAEL ; Konstantios, Dimitrios ; Fafaliou, Irene ; Giaka, Maria.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:99834.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Leveraging “Green” Human Resource Practices to Enable Environmental and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Qatari Oil and Gas Industry. (2020). Obeidat, Shatha M ; Elbanna, Said ; al Bakri, Anas A.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:164:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-018-4075-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Why firms go green and how green impacts financial and innovation performance differently: An awareness-motivation-capability perspective. (2020). Lindsay, Wendy ; Zhao, Mengli ; Liu, Jinxin ; Shu, Chengli.
    In: Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
    RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:37:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10490-018-9630-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Environmental Policy with Green Consumerism. (2020). De Donder, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02993200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Environmental Policy with Green Consumerism. (2020). De Donder, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02945517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Greening Industry in Vietnam: Environmental Management Standards and Resource Efficiency in SMEs. (2020). Fadly, Dalia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7455-:d:411704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Green Activity-Based Costing Production Decision Model for Recycled Paper. (2020). Chang, Yao-Chung ; Tsai, Wen-Hsien ; Hsieh, Chu-Lun.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:2413-:d:357076.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Promoting discount schemes as a nudge strategy to enhance environmental behaviour. (2020). Metta, Julie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fae:wpaper:2020.11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Green innovations and export performance. (2020). SIEDSCHLAG, IULIA ; Meneto, Stefano.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:esr:wpaper:wp674.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Green investments and firm performance. (2020). SIEDSCHLAG, IULIA ; Yan, Weijie.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:esr:wpaper:wp672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Barierrs to Implementing the Concept of Green Human Resource Management: The Case of Poland. (2020). Bombiak, Edyta.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:66-81.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Environmental management systems, practices and outcomes: Differences in resource allocation between small and large firms. (2020). Boon-Itt, Sakun ; Wong, Chee Yew.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:228:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Comparing the effectiveness of market-based and choice-based environmental policy. (2020). Walter, Jason.
    In: Journal of Policy Modeling.
    RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:42:y:2020:i:1:p:173-191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Do Banks Value Green Management in China? The Perspective of the Green Credit Policy. (2020). Zhang, Yuming ; Wang, Yuan ; Xing, Chao.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:35:y:2020:i:c:s1544612319314771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance. (2020). Scholtens, Bert ; Mulder, Machiel ; Trinks, Arjan.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:175:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919310675.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Profit Decomposition: Analyzing the Pathway from Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction to Revenues and Costs. (2020). Rokhmawati, Andewi.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-04-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Impact of Green Practices on the Financial Performance: A Study of Indian Automobile Companies. (2020). Chaudhary, Ritika ; Kaur, Rajinder ; Kour, Manjit ; Bhullar, Arshan.
    In: International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues.
    RePEc:eco:journ1:2020-05-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Environmental Policy with Green Consumerism. (2020). De Donder, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8457.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Assessing the determinants of performance in the recycling business: Evidence from the Italian context. (2019). Quaglia, Roberto ; Franceschelli, Maria Vittoria ; Santoro, Gabriele ; Giacosa, Elisa.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:1086-1099.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Bridging market demand, proactivity, and technology competence with eco‐innovations: The moderating role of innovation openness. (2019). Liao, Yichuan ; Tsai, Kuenhung.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:3:p:653-663.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Managerial attributes, consumer proximity, and corporate environmental performance. (2019). Cho, Theresa S ; Lee, Jessie.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:1:p:159-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Do environmental and economic performance go together? A review of micro-level empirical evidence from the past decade or so. (2019). Kruse, Tobias ; Kozluk, Tomasz ; de Serres, Alain ; Dechezleprêtre, Antoine ; Nachtigall, Daniel ; Dechezlepretre, Antoine ; Koluk, Tomasz.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:100900.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Environmental responsibility, market valuation, and firm characteristics: Evidence from China. (2018). Xie, Feixue ; Wang, Shujing ; Hu, Junnan.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:6:p:1376-1387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Antecedents and Consequences of Eco‐Control Deployment: Evidence from Canadian Manufacturing Firms. (2018). Journeault, Marc ; Henri, Jeanfranois.
    In: Accounting Perspectives.
    RePEc:wly:accper:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:253-273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Environmental Policy Performances for Sustainable Development: From the Perspective of ISO 14001 Certification. (2017). Noh, Yonghwi ; Lee, Sang M ; Rha, Jin Sung ; Choi, Donghyun.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:24:y:2017:i:2:p:108-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. (2017). Varadarajan, Rajan.
    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
    RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:45:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11747-015-0461-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic modelling technique. (2017). Szekely, Nadine ; Brocke, Jan Vom.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0174807.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Too Little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance. (2017). Guenther, Thomas ; Trumpp, Christoph.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:1:p:49-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Examining Stakeholders Perceptions of Mining Impacts and Corporate Social Responsibility. (2016). Viveros, Hector.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:50-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. (2016). Leonidou, Constantinos N ; Katsikeas, Constantine S ; Zeriti, Athina.
    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
    RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:44:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s11747-015-0470-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Green Practices and Organizational Design as Sources of Strategic Flexibility and Performance. (2016). Perez-Valls, Miguel ; Moreno-Garcia, Juan ; Cespedes-Lorente, Jose.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:8:p:529-544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Corporate Ownership and Environmental Proactivity. (2016). Tutore, Ilaria ; Profumo, Giorgia ; Calza, Francesco.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:6:p:369-389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. (2016). Lee, Ki-Hoon ; Cin, Beom Cheol.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:40-53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Environmental Policy in the Nordic Wood Product Industry: Insights Into Firms’ Strategies and Communication. (2016). Räty, Tarmo ; Raty, Tarmo ; Riala, Maria ; Toppinen, Anne ; Roos, Anders ; Nyrud, Anders Q.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:10-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Being ‘Green and Competitive’: The Impact of Environmental Actions and Collaborations on Firm Performance. (2015). Dangelico, Rosa Maria ; Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:413-430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Motivating Employees towards Sustainable Behaviour. (2015). Fruhen, Laura ; Mearns, Kathryn ; Temminck, Elisha .
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:402-412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Input, Output, and Environmental Management Productivity: Effects on Firm Performance. (2015). Gonzalez-Benito, Oscar ; Lannelongue, Gustavo.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:24:y:2015:i:3:p:145-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Environmental Policy, Company Environment Protection, and Stock Market Performance: Evidence from China. (2014). Dai, Yunhao ; Liu, Shasha ; Kong, Dongmin.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:21:y:2014:i:2:p:100-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Climate Change and Financial Performance in Times of Crisis. (2014). Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel M. ; Gallego-Alvarez, Isabel ; Vieira, Cleber Silva .
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:23:y:2014:i:6:p:361-374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Sustainable Development in the Russia Federation: The Limits of Greening within Industrial Firms. (2012). Rodgers, Peter ; Crotty, JO.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:19:y:2012:i:3:p:178-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Factors Influencing Companies Success in Attaining Environmental Awards. (2012). Ibrahim, Essam ; Hassan, Abeer.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:32-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. (2011). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul ; Laurentlucchetti, Jeremy.
    In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
    RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:803-842.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-22 11:43:52 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.