1. Green absorptive capacity and environmental performance: a perspective of SMEs’ relational capability and green supply chain management practices. (2025). Ibrahim, Muhammad ; Mahmood, Rosli.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04420-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Digitalisation and environmental management activities: The effects of family ownership`. (2024). Issah, Wunnam Basit ; Sharif, Taimur ; Ferdous, Lutfa Tilat ; Bhuiyan, Faruk.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:5:p:4351-4374.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. The influence of board interlocks and sustainability experience on transparent sustainability disclosure. (2024). Lu, Jing ; Nazari, Jamal A ; Herremans, Irene M ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh ; Yu, Dongning.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:5:p:3769-3793.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The Connection between Absorptive Capacity and Green Innovation: The Function of Board Capital and Environmental Regulation. (2023). san Ong, Tze ; Javeed, Sohail Ahmad ; Muthaiyah, Saravanan ; Latief, Rashid ; Phuong, Nguyen Thi ; Teh, Boon Heng.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3119-:d:1064275.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Corporate social responsibility misconduct and formation of board interlocks. (2023). Wang, Yujie ; Xiang, YI ; Yao, Daifei ; Tsang, Albert.
   In: Journal of Financial Stability.
   RePEc:eee:finsta:v:67:y:2023:i:c:s1572308923000621.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. How does board interlock network matter for sustainability? A social learning approach to corporate environmental performance. (2023). Zhao, YI ; Lee, Jegoo.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:32:y:2023:i:8:p:5889-5908.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Carbon emission reduction effects of industrial robot applications: Heterogeneity characteristics and influencing mechanisms. (2022). Zhang, Yuru ; Li, Yaya ; Veglianti, Eleonora ; Pan, AN.
   In: Technology in Society.
   RePEc:eee:teinso:v:70:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001750.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Are firms with better sustainability performance more resilient during crises?. (2022). Foti, Lianne ; Rodenburg, Kathleen ; Lu, Jing ; Pegoraro, Ann.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:3354-3370.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance. (2022). Jermias, Johnny ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:2992-3013.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Antecedents of absorptive capacity in the development of circular economy business models of small and medium enterprises. (2022). Daddi, Tiberio ; Marrucci, Luca ; Iraldo, Fabio ; Iannone, Fabio.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:532-544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. How Does Family Involvement Affect Environmental Innovation? A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective. (2021). Kim, Sang-Joon ; Lee, Juil ; Han, Joohee.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13114-:d:688887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abernethy, M. A., & Chua, W. F. (1996). A field study of control system “redesign”: The impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 569–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00515.x.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767.

3. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Bowen, F. E. (2000). Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(200003/04)9:2<92::aid-bse230>3.0.co;2-x.

5. Bueno‐Garcia, M., Ortiz‐Perez, A., & Mellado‐Garcia, E. (2021). Shareholders environmental profile and its impact on firms environmental proactivity: An institutional approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2626.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H., & Semadeni, M. (2016). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2639–2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475.

7. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R &D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763.

8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393275.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Davis, G. F. (1996). The significance of board interlocks for corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4(3), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.1996.tb00144.x.

11. Delmas, M., Hoffmann, V. H., & Kuss, M. (2011). Under the tip of the iceberg: Absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Business & Society, 50(1), 116–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394400.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Dzhengiz, T., & Niesten, E. (2020). Competences for environmental sustainability: A systematic review on the impact of absorptive capacity and capabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 881–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04360-z.

13. García‐Sánchez, I.‐M., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Zafra‐Gómez, J.‐L. (2020). Do the ecoinnovation and ecodesign strategies generate value added in munificent environments? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2414.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. García‐Sánchez, I.‐M., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Zafra‐Gómez, J.‐L. (2021). Do independent, female and specialist directors promote eco‐innovation and eco‐design in agri‐food firms? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1136–1152. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2676.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. García‐Sánchez, I.‐M., Martín‐Moreno, J., Khan, S. A., & Hussain, N. (2021). Socio‐emotional wealth and corporate responses to environmental hostility: Are family firms more stakeholder oriented? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2666.

16. Gerged, A. M. (2021). Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2642.

17. Gerged, A. M., Matthews, L., & Elheddad, M. (2021). Mandatory disclosure, greenhouse gas emissions and the cost of equity capital: UK evidence of a U‐shaped relationship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 908–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2661.

18. Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879.

19. Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1483–1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x.

20. Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252252.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179.

22. Hizarci‐Payne, A. K., İpek, İ., & Kurt Gümüş, G. (2021). How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1174–1190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2678.

23. Hughes, M., Morgan, R. E., Ireland, R. D., & Hughes, P. (2014). Social capital and learning advantages: A problem of absorptive capacity. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(3), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Ingenbleek, P., & Dentoni, D. (2016). Learning from stakeholder pressure and embeddedness: The roles of absorptive capacity in the corporate social responsibility of Dutch Agribusinesses. Sustainability, 8(10), 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101026.

25. Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6.

27. Kim, D., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Review, 106(5), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032.

28. Kiron, D., Unruh, G., Reeves, M., Kruschwitz, N., Rubel, H., & ZumFelde, A. M. (2017). Corporate sustainability at a crossroads: Progress toward our common future in uncertain times. MIT Sloan Management Review & Boston Consulting Group. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/corporate-sustainability-at-acrossroads/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383.

30. Kong, D., Yang, X., Liu, C., & Yang, W. (2020). Business strategy and firm efforts on environmental protection: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2376.

31. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L.

32. Lee, K.‐H., Cin, B. C., & Lee, E. Y. (2016). Environmental responsibility and firm performance: The application of an environmental, social and governance model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1855.

33. Lenox, M., & King, A. (2004). Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.379.

34. Liu, C., & Kong, D. (2021). Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2645.

35. Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326.

36. Lu, J., Yu, D., Mahmoudian, F., Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2021). Board interlocks and greenhouse gas emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2611.

37. Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A. A., & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are women eco‐friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3146–3161. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2563.

42. Orazalin, N. (2020). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2354.

43. Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Aragon‐Correa, J. A. (2015). Boards and sustainability: The contingent influence of director interlocks on corporate environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1833.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Pacheco, L. M., Alves, M. F. R., & Liboni, L. B. (2018). Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2208.

45. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organization: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Prado‐Lorenzo, J.‐M., & Garcia‐Sanchez, I.‐M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2021). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2635.

48. Ravasi, D., & Zattoni, A. (2006). Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed‐ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1671–1702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x.

49. Ren, S., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., & Yan, J. (2021). CEO hometown identity and firm green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 756–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2652.

50. Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, R. S. (2012). Governance, media and the quality of environmental disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(6), 610–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.09.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Chen, Y., Ullah, F., Li, H.‐X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2345.

52. Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.2.zok246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Sun, W., Li, X., Geng, Y., Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Board interlocks and the diffusion of CSR reporting practices: The role of market development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1887.

55. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/Smj.820.

56. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(Sici)1097‐0266(199708)18:7<509::Aid‐Smj882>3.0.Co;2‐Z.

57. Thorne, L., Mahoney, L. S., Gregory, K., & Convery, S. (2017). A comparison of Canadian and U.S. CSR strategic alliances, CSR reporting, and CSR performance: Insights into implicit–explicit CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2799-6.

58. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Morner, M. (2015). Board of directors diversity, creativity, and cognitive conflict. International Studies of Management and Organization, 45(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1005992.

59. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0503.

60. Watson, R., Wilson, H. N., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E. K. (2018). Harnessing difference: A capability‐based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12394.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Wolfolds, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2019). Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two‐step method without a valid instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 432–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2995.

62. Xie, X., Zhu, Q., & Wang, R. (2019). Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms green image. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2323.

63. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Zou, H., Xie, X., Meng, X., & Yang, M. (2019). The diffusion of corporate social responsibility through social network ties: From the perspective of strategic imitation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1670.

65. Zou, H., Xie, X., Qi, G., & Yang, M. (2019). The heterogeneous relationship between board social ties and corporate environmental responsibility in an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2180.

1. The Association of Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Quality: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. (2023). Alfaraj, Mohammad ; Hameed, Khizar.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16849-:d:1300321.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The role of audit committees in social responsibility and environmental disclosures: evidence from Chinese energy sector. (2022). Wang, Junhui ; Sun, Jerry.
   In: International Journal of Disclosure and Governance.
   RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:19:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41310-021-00131-3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Corporate governance and sustainability: a review of the existing literature. (2022). Naciti, Valeria ; Pulejo, Luisa ; Cesaroni, Fabrizio.
   In: Journal of Management & Governance.
   RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:26:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09554-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Effect of the CSR Committee and CSR-Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance. (2022). Smaili, Nadia ; Radu, Camelia.
   In: Journal of Business Ethics.
   RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:180:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-021-04904-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Determinants/Motivations of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Developing Economies: A Survey of the Extant Literature. (2022). Ali, Waris ; Husnain, Muhammad ; Wilson, Jeffrey.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3474-:d:772442.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports. (2022). Shailer, Greg ; Xiao, Xinning.
   In: The British Accounting Review.
   RePEc:eee:bracre:v:54:y:2022:i:1:s0890838921000287.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare. (2021). Kilic, Merve ; Kuzey, Cemil ; Uyar, Ali ; Karaman, Abdullah S.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1730-1748.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The impact of board cultural diversity on a firms commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee. (2021). Vivas, Miguel ; Martinezferrero, Jennifer ; Lozano, Belen M.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:675-685.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The mediating effect of strategic posture on corporate governance and environmental reporting. (2021). Ahmad, Noor Hazlina ; Iranmanesh, Mohammad ; Amran, Azlan ; Shwairef, Abdalla.
   In: Review of Managerial Science.
   RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-019-00343-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Sustainability Reporting and Firms’ Economic Performance: Evidence from Asia and Africa. (2021). Kazemikhasragh, Amirreza ; Panetti, Eva ; Cicchiello, Antonella Francesca ; Giron, Alicia.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:12:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-020-00693-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?. (2021). Owusu-Agyei, Samuel ; Konadu, Renata ; Ahinful, Gabriel Sam.
    In: International Journal of Disclosure and Governance.
    RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:18:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1057_s41310-021-00115-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Boards of directors and corporate sustainability performance: evidence from the emerging East Asian markets. (2021). Nguyen, Linh-TX ; Frömmel, Michael ; Frommel, Michael.
    In: International Journal of Disclosure and Governance.
    RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:18:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-020-00102-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Empirical Evidence from France. (2021). Boukattaya, Sonia ; Omri, Abdelwahed.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4712-:d:541677.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The Dimension of Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Broadness of Information in Italian Companies. (2021). Nisio, Antonio ; Milone, Virginia ; Spallini, Sabrina ; Romanazzi, Patrizia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1457-:d:490043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms. (2021). Ammar, R M ; Khan, Muhammad Kaleem ; Sagi, Judit ; Saleem, Adil.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10662-:d:643082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The Effect of the Characteristics and Activities of the Board of Directors on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Disclosures: Empirical Evidence from Southeast Asia. (2021). Wardhani, Ratna ; Sekarlangit, Lintang D.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8007-:d:596380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Drivers and value-relevance of CSR performance in the logistics sector: A cross-country firm-level investigation. (2021). Kilic, Merve ; Govindan, Kannan ; Uyar, Ali ; Karaman, Abdullah S.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:231:y:2021:i:c:s0925527320302048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Bridging production factors allocation and environmental performance of China’s heavy-polluting energy firms: The moderation effect of financing and internationalization. (2021). Qu, Zhengyu ; Zhu, Yue ; Song, Yazhi ; Xing, Xinpeng ; Liu, Tiansen.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:222:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221001924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance. (2021). Orazalin, Nurlan ; Mahmood, Monowar.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:8:p:3569-3588.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Enhancing environmental information transparency through corporate social responsibility reporting regulation. (2021). Pizzi, Simone ; Leopizzi, Rossella ; Ligorio, Lorenzo ; Caputo, Fabio.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:8:p:3470-3484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Board interlocks, absorptive capacity, and environmental performance. (2021). Lu, Jing ; Nazari, Jamal A ; Herremans, Irene M ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh ; Yu, Dongning.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:8:p:3425-3443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. An examination of sustainable development of supply chain using foreignness perspective. (2021). Sarkis, Joseph ; Joardar, Arpita.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:630-642.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings. (2020). Velte, Patrick ; Stawinoga, Martin.
    In: Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung.
    RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:31:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00187-020-00308-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Italy Towards Mandatory Sustainability Reporting. Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Italian Companies and Legislative Decree 254/2016 Statements. A Quantitative Analysis of the Last 10 Years. (2020). Torelli, Riccardo ; Furlotti, Katia ; Balluchi, Federica.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:9agvf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Exploring the Determinants of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Examination. (2020). Liang, Wan-Chen ; Yu, Sui-Hua .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2368-:d:333880.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Sustainability Reporting Quality of Peruvian Listed Companies and the Impact of Regulatory Requirements of Sustainability Disclosures. (2020). Loza Adaui, Cristian.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1135-:d:316797.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Alliances between For-Profit and Non-Profit Organizations as an Instrument to Implement the Economy for the Common Good. (2020). Sanchis, Joan R ; Talavera, Carmen.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9511-:d:445447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Corporate Governance, Integrated Reporting and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from the South African Context. (2020). Martini, Silvio Bianchi ; Doni, Federica ; Corvino, Antonio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4820-:d:370739.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. How Does Board Gender Diversity Influence the Likelihood of Becoming a UN Global Compact Signatory? The Mediating Effect of the CSR Committee. (2020). Colakoglu, Nese ; Eryilmaz, Mehmet ; Martinez-Ferrero, Jennifer.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4329-:d:362721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Greenhouse Gases and Circular Economy Issues in Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector in the European Union. (2020). Szafraniec, Marek ; Janik, Agnieszka ; Ryszko, Adam.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:5993-:d:446237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Sustainability reporting quality and post‐audit financial reporting quality: Empirical evidence from the UK. (2020). Alshaer, Habiba.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:2355-2373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry. (2019). Terzani, Simone ; Kiseleva, Evgeniia ; Cardoni, Andrea.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1093-:d:207303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. How to Lead the Board of Directors to a Sustainable Development of Business with the CSR Committees. (2019). Gennari, Francesca.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6987-:d:295282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure and Its Consequences on the Sustainability Reporting Quality of Italian and German Companies. (2019). Loza Adaui, Cristian ; Mion, Giorgio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4612-:d:260693.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Board Directors’ Expertise and Corporate Corruption Disclosure: The Moderating Role of Political Connections. (2019). Mi, Seong ; Kaium, Md Abdul ; Kim, Jong Dae ; Manzanares, Javier.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4491-:d:258993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting. (2019). Velte, Patrick ; Kordsachia, Othar ; Gerwanski, Jannik.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:28:y:2019:i:5:p:750-770.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Which Corporate Governance Mechanisms Drive CSR Disclosure Practices in Emerging Countries?. (2018). del Mar, Maria ; Martinez-Martinez, Domingo ; Escobar-Perez, Bernabe.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:61-:d:192578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms. (2018). Lee, Younggeun ; Zhuang, Yiming ; Chang, Xinyue.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2752-:d:161898.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. A Cross-Country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective. (2018). Mi, Seong ; Abdul, M D ; Kim, Jong Dae.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2611-:d:159925.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Board Governance and Sustainability Disclosure: A Cross-Sectional Study of Singapore-Listed Companies. (2018). Hu, Meibo ; Loh, Lawrence.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2578-:d:159526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Entrepreneurial Leadership, Performance, and Sustainability of Micro-Enterprises in Malaysia. (2018). Al Mamun, Abdullah ; Fazal, Syed Ali ; Hakimin, Mohd Nor ; Ibrahim, Mohamed Dahlan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1591-:d:146591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Does Corporate Governance Affect Sustainability Disclosure? A Mixed Methods Study. (2018). Ahmad, Zubair ; Mahmood, Zeeshan ; Ali, Waris ; Salman, Tahira ; Kouser, Rehana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:207-:d:127138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis. (2018). Giraldez-Puig, Pilar ; Perez-Calero, Leticia ; Hurtado-Gonzalez, Jose Manuel ; Guerrero-Villegas, Jaime.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4808-:d:191061.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System. (2018). Savioli, Marco ; Birindelli, Giuliana ; Dellatti, Stefano ; Iannuzzi, Antonia Patrizia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4699-:d:189408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure. (2017). Jizi, Mohammad.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:5:p:640-655.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Modelling Corporate Stakeholder Orientation: Does the Relationship Between Stakeholder Background Characteristics and Corporate Social Performance Matter?. (2017). Erdiaw-Kwasie, Michael O ; Alam, Khorshed ; Kabir, Enamul.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:465-479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View. (2017). Galbreath, Jeremy.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:3:p:358-370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Listed Companies. (2016). Emre, Akbas Halil .
    In: South East European Journal of Economics and Business.
    RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:11:y:2016:i:2:p:7-19:n:1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. How Do Strengths and Weaknesses in Corporate Social Performance Across Different Stakeholder Domains Affect Company Performance?. (2016). Kumar, Kamalesh ; Michelon, Giovanna ; Boesso, Giacomo.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:4:p:277-292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Using Management Control Systems to Implement CSR Activities: An Empirical Analysis of 12 Japanese Companies. (2015). Hosoda, Masahiro ; Suzuki, Kenichi ; Eweje, Gabriel.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:24:y:2015:i:7:p:628-642.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 21:15:23 || Missing content? Let us know