create a website

Sustainable university entrepreneurship: Revisiting firm growth patterns. (2022). Fernández-López, Sara ; Lopez, Sara Fernandez ; Rodriguezgulias, Maria Jesus ; Nogueiramoreiras, Manuel Anxo ; Rodeiropazos, David.
In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1334-1346.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 84

References cited by this document

Cocites: 22

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Advancing sustainable entrepreneurial universities: sustainability transformations of university business incubators in Germany. (2024). Karahan, Marc.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:63:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11187-023-00860-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Acs, Z. J. (2015). High‐impact firms: Gazelles revisited. In Z. J. Acs (Ed.), Global entrepreneurship, institutions and incentives (pp. 542–583). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718053.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Acs, Z. J., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High‐impact firms: Gazelles revisited. Washington, DC: Office of Advocacy of the US Small Business Administration (SBA).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Andersén, J., Jansson, C., & Ljungkvist, T. (2020). Can environmentally oriented CEOs and environmentally friendly suppliers boost the growth of small firms? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2366.

  4. Arrighetti, A., & Lasagni, A. (2011). Assessing the determinants of high‐growth manufacturing firms in Italy. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 20(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2013.783456.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Autio, E., Kronlund, M., & Kovalainen, A. (2007). High‐growth SME support initiatives in nine countries: Analysis, categorization, and recommendations. Ministry of Trade and Industry, 1/2007, Ministry of Trade and Industry Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Balasubramanian, S., Shukla, V., Mangla, S., & Chanchaichujit, J. (2021). Do firm characteristics affect environmental sustainability? A literature review‐based assessment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2692.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Ben‐Hafaïedh, C., Micozzi, A., & Pattitoni, P. (2018). Academic spin‐offs' entrepreneurial teams and performance: A subgroups approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9623-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bianchini, S., Pellegrino, G., & Tamagni, F. (2015). Innovation strategies and firm growth: New longitudinal evidence from Spanish firms. DRUID 15th Conference, Rome, Italy, 1, 1–25. https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/submissions.xhtml.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2010). Valuing university‐based firms: The effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00369.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Inside the high‐tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34, 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Brown, R., Mawson, S., & Mason, C. (2017). Myth‐busting and entrepreneurship policy: The case of high growth firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(5–6), 414–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1291762.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Calvo, N., Rodeiro‐Pazos, D., & Fernández‐López, S. (2017). Science and technology parks as accelerators of knowledge‐intensive business services. A case study. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2017.081025.

  15. Canay, I. A. (2011). A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 14(3), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2011.00349.x.

  16. Cantner, U., & Goethner, M. (2011). Performance differences between academic spin‐offs and non‐academic star‐ups: A comparative analysis using a non‐parametric matching approach. DIME Final Conference, Maastricht, 1(6–8April), 1–49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high‐tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., & Nightingale, P. (2014). High‐growth firms: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt052.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015.

  21. Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2005). Are academic start‐ups different?. A matched pair analysis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Colombo, M., Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Dynamics of science‐based entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9114-6.

  23. Corsi, C., & Prencipe, A. (2018). The contribution of university spin‐offs to the competitive advantage of regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0501-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Czarnitzki, D., Rammer, C., & Toole, A. A. (2014). University spin‐offs and the “performance premium”. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9538-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. D'Orazio, B. (2020). The role of innovation efforts in raising the growth performance of technology and knowledge‐based small and medium‐sized firms. Evidence from the Italian context. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 11(9), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n9p3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Daunfeldt, S., Elert, N., & Johansson, D. (2015). Are high‐growth firms overrepresented in high‐tech industries? Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv035.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high‐growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Ensley, M. D., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university‐based and independent start‐ups. Research Policy, 34, 1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008.

  29. Epure, M., Prior, D., & Serarols, C. (2016). Assessing technology‐ based spin‐offs from university support units. Regional Studies, 50(3), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.921669.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Eurostat. (2007). Eurostat‐OECD manual on business demography statistics, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, OCDE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs. Location, survival and growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd.

  32. Fernández‐López, S., Rodeiro‐Pazos, D., García‐González, F., & Rodríguez‐Gulías, M. J. (2019). Determinants of high‐growth university spin‐offs in Spain. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(4), 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2018-0027.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Fernández‐López, S., Rodríguez‐Gulías, M. J., & Rodeiro‐Pazos, D. (2017). The performance of the academic KIBS firms in a ‘moderate innovator’ country: A longitudinal analysis. In J. J. Ferreira, L. P. Dana, & V. Ratten (Eds.), Knowledge spillover‐based strategic entrepreneurship (pp. 130–147). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Fini, R., Fu, K., Tuft Mathisen, M., Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2017). Institutional determinants of university spin‐off quantity and quality: A longitudinal, multilevel, cross‐country study. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Galati, F., Bigliardi, B., Petroni, A., & Marolla, G. (2017). Which factors are perceived as obstacles for the growth of Italian academic spin‐offs? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1199853.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Galvao, A. F. (2011). Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 164(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.02.016.

  37. George, G., Zahra, S. A., & Wood, D. R. (2002). The effects of business ‐ university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6.

  38. Gibrat, R. (1931) Les inégalités économiques. Applications: aux inégalitês des richesses, à la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc. d'une loi nouvelle: la loi de l'effet proportionnel. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Gubitta, P., Tognazzo, A., & Destro, F. (2016). Signaling in academic ventures: The role of technology transfer offices and university funds. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 368–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9398-7.

  40. Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. (2010). Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin‐off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1241–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903167912.

  41. Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z.

  42. Hernández, J. M., Fontrodona, J., Fontana, I., & Amat, O. (2000). Las empresas gacela en Cataluña; Un estudio centrado en el trienio 1995−1997. Economía Industrial, 334(4), 55–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Hess, S., & Siegwart, R. Y. (2013). R&D venture: Proposition of a technology transfer concept for breakthrough technologies with R&D cooperation: A case study in the energy sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9249-8.

  44. Hesse, N., & Sternberg, R. (2017). Alternative growth patterns of university spin‐offs: Why so many remain small? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 953–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0431-6.

  45. Heyes, J., Lewis, P., & Clark, I. (2012). Varieties of capitalism, neoliberalism and the economic crisis of 2008? Industrial Relations Journal, 43(3), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2012.00669.x.

  46. Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast‐growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9182-x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Klapper, R. G., Upham, P., & Blundel, R. K. (2021). Insider perspectives on growth: Implications for a nondichotomous understanding of ‘sustainable’ and conventional entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(3), 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2710.

  48. Leendertse, J., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Eveleens, C. P. (2021). The sustainable start‐up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start‐ups. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2667.

  49. Lindström, G., & Olofsson, C. (2001). Early stage financing of NTBFs: An analysis of contributions from support actors. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 3(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060110042754.

  50. Llantada, B., Aranceta, I., de Arbulo López, R., Manzano, L., & Laskibar, G. (2012). Las empresas de alto crecimiento (pp. 1361–1368). Un análisis de los principales trabajos en España. XVI Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin‐out companies. Research Policy, 34, 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.

  52. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin‐off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. López‐García, P., & Puente, S. (2012). What makes a high‐growth firm? A probit analysis using Spanish firm‐level data. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 1029–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9321-z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Martínez‐Ferrero, J., & Frías‐Aceituno, J. V. (2015). Relationship between sustainable development and financial performance: International empirical research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1803.

  55. Martínez‐Fierro, S., Biedma‐Ferrer, J. M., & Ruiz‐Navarro, J. (2020). Impact of high‐growth start‐ups on entrepreneurial environment based on the level of national economic development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2413.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Mason, C. R., Brown, M. H., & Anyadike‐Danes, M. (2015). High growth firms, jobs and peripheral regions: The case of Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu032.

  57. Mathisen, M. T., & Rasmussen, E. (2019). The development, growth, and performance of university spin‐offs: A critical review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1891–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09714-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Mazzucato, M., & Parris, S. (2015). High‐growth firms in changing competitive environments: The US pharmaceutical industry (1963 to 2002). Small Business Economics, 44(1), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9583-3.

  59. Miranda, F. J., Chamorro, A., & Rubio, S. (2018). Re‐thinking university spin‐off: A critical literature review and a research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 1007–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9647-z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Moreno, F., & Coad, A. (2015). High‐growth firms: Stylized facts and conflicting results. In A. C. Corbett, J. A. Katz, & A. Mckelvie (Eds.), Entrepreneurial growth: individual, firm, and region (advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth) (Vol. 17) (pp. 187–230). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin‐off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X282862.

  62. NESTA. (2009). The vital 6 per cent: How high‐growth innovative businesses generate prosperity and jobs. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA). Londres.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. OECD. (2007). Working party of national experts on science and technology indicators: revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati Manual, available at http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/38235147.pdf (accessed January 2017).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Ortín, P., & Vendrell, F. (2014). University spin‐offs vs. other NTBFs: Productivity differences at the outset and evolution. Technovation, 34(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin‐offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Rodríguez‐Gulías, M. J., Fernández‐López, S., & Rodeiro‐Pazos, D. (2016). Growth determinants in entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of Spanish technology‐based university spin‐offs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0185-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Rodríguez‐Gulías, M. J., Fernández‐López, S., Rodeiro‐Pazos, D., & Sousa Gabriel, V. M. (2017). La creación y el perfil de las empresas de alto crecimiento en las universidades: el caso de España. Portuguese Journal of Finance, Management and Accounting, 3(6), 88–105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Rodríguez‐Gulías, M. J., Rodeiro‐Pazos, D., & Fernández‐López, S. (2017a). The growth of university spin‐offs: A dynamic panel data approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(10), 1181–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1277580.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Rodríguez‐Gulías, M. J., Rodeiro‐Pazos, D., & Fernández‐López, S. (2017b). The effect of university and regional knowledge spillovers on firms' performance: An analysis of the Spanish USOs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0399.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Salvador, E. (2011). How effective are research spin‐off firms in Italy? Revenue d'Économie Industrielle, 133, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.4972.

  72. Salvador, E., Marullo, C., & Piccaluga, A. (2019). Determinants of growth in research spin‐offs: A resource‐based perspective. Recherches en Sciences de Gestio, 4, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.3917/resg.133.0053.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Sciarelli, M., Landi, G. C., Turriziani, L., & Tani, M. (2021). Academic entrepreneurship: Founding and governance determinants in university spin‐off ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(4), 1083–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09798-2.

  74. Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High‐growth firms and innovation: An empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9563-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Segarra, A., Teruel, M., & Jové, E. (2016). High‐growth firms and innovation in European countries. EKONOMIAZ. Revista Vasca de economía, 90(2), 194–221.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Serarols, C., Cayón, M., & Criaco, G. (2011). Factores de éxito y financiación de las spin‐offs universitarias. Revista de Contabilidad Y Dirección, 12, 165–182.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Tagliazucchi, G., Marchi, G., & Balboni, B. (2021). A nonlinear relationship between the team composition and performance in university spin‐offs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121061.

  79. Teruel‐Sánchez, R., Briones‐Peñalver, A. J., Bernal‐Conesa, J. A., & de Nieves‐Nieto, C. (2021). Influence of the entrepreneur's capacity in business performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2456–2467. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2757.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. van Geenhuizen, M., Ye, Q., & Au‐Yong Oliveira, M. (2015). A skills approach to growth of university spin‐off firms: Export as an example. In D. V. Gibson & J. Slovák (Ed.), The 14th ICTPI Conference, Brno Czech Republic. Building Sustainable R&D Centers in Emerging Technology Regions (pp. 147–166). Brno, Chequia: Muni Press, Masaryk University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Vega‐Gómez, F. I., Miranda‐González, F. J. H., & Pérez‐Mayo, J. (2020). Analyzing the effects of institutional‐and ecosystem‐level variables on university spin‐off performance. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020931116. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931116.

  82. Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40, 1128–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014.

  83. Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E., & Larrañeta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin‐off. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm018.

  84. Zhang, J. (2009). The performance of university spin‐offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9088-9.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Effects of Environmental Legislation via Green Procurement Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review. (2025). Vocks, Lonneke ; Verboeket, Victor ; Vos, Bart.
    In: Logistics.
    RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:95-:d:1701156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does resource orchestration theory ensure the better SME performance: A three-wave time lag investigation among manufacturing SMEs of the developing economies. (2025). Nisar, Nabeel ; Matloob, Sheema ; Raza, Ali ; Waqas, Ali ; Khan, Mohammad Jamal.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s004016252400605x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Evaluating the effect of green technological innovations on organizational and environmental performance: A treble innovation approach. (2024). Opazo-Basaez, Marco ; Monroy-Osorio, Juan Carlos ; Mari, Josip.
    In: Technovation.
    RePEc:eee:techno:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0166497223001967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. How do government R&D subsidies affect corporate green innovation choices? Perspectives from strategic and substantive innovation. (2024). Hunjra, Ahmed ; Abbassi, Wajih ; Zhao, Shikuan ; Zhang, Han.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:93:y:2024:i:pa:p:1378-1396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Social credit scoring system and corporate pollution governance: Insights from Chinas Social Credit System Construction. (2024). Chan, Kam C ; Hua, Min ; Yang, Yuanyuan ; Zhao, Yujie.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pb:s1057521924007063.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Supply Chain Risks, Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Organizational Performance: A Research Direction. (2023). Sobry, Suheil Che ; Ibrahim, Norzawani ; Fatihah, Nik Zirwatul ; Muhammad, Afif Zuhri.
    In: Information Management and Business Review.
    RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:429-438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. CSR and Sustainable Growth in China’s Technology Firms between 2010 and 2021. (2023). Latif, Yasir ; Ma, Chen ; Yu, Changjiang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2101-:d:1044119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Unveiling the Influence: Exploring the Impact of Interrelationships among E-Commerce Supply Chain Members on Supply Chain Sustainability. (2023). Sindakis, Stavros ; Showkat, Saloome ; Su, Jiafu.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16642-:d:1295848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Resource Orchestration in Enhancing Green Innovation and Environmental Performance in SME. (2023). Vipriyanti, Nyoman Utari ; Rustiarini, Ni Wayan ; Yuria, Ni Putu ; Sriary, Desak Ayu.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2023-05-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study. (2023). Andersen, Jim.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:32:y:2023:i:8:p:5506-5520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Business growth and sustainability in the spanish wine industry. (2022). Pinilla, Vicente ; Serrano, Raul ; Garcia-Cortijo, Maria Carmen ; Castillo-Valero, Juan Sebastian ; Ferrer, Juan R.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo.
    RePEc:zar:wpaper:dt2022-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Literature Review. (2022). Cruz, Sandra P ; Raimundo, Ricardo Jorge ; Rosario, Alberico Travassos.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5556-:d:809028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Green Purchase Intentions: Mediating Role of Green Brand Image and Consumer Beliefs towards the Environment. (2022). Attila, Szakacs ; Aslam, Sumaira ; Murtaza, Shah Ali ; Majeed, Muhammad Ussama ; Molnar, Edina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11703-:d:918112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Strategic motives and performance implications of proactive versus reactive environmental strategies in corporate sustainable development. (2022). , Ricky ; Kim, Namwoon.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:2127-2142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. (2022). Khanra, Sayantan ; Joseph, Rojers P ; Kaur, Puneet ; Malik, Ashish ; Dhir, Amandeep.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1395-1413.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Sustainable university entrepreneurship: Revisiting firm growth patterns. (2022). Fernández-López, Sara ; Lopez, Sara Fernandez ; Rodriguezgulias, Maria Jesus ; Nogueiramoreiras, Manuel Anxo ; Rodeiropazos, David.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1334-1346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. (2022). Asiaei, Kaveh ; Alizadeh, Raziye ; Bontis, Nick ; Yaghoubi, Mehdi.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:76-93.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. (2021). Andersn, Jim.
    In: Technovation.
    RePEc:eee:techno:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0166497221000353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Sustainable development in aviation logistics: Successful drivers and business strategies. (2021). Wu, Peiju ; Yang, Chunkai.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:8:p:3763-3771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Influence of the entrepreneurs capacity in business performance. (2021). Teruelsanchez, Ricardo ; Bernalconesa, Juan Andres ; de Nievesnieto, Carmen ; Brionespealver, Antonio Juan.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:5:p:2453-2467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Inspiring employees ecological behaviors: The roles of corporate environmental strategy, biospheric values, and eco‐centric leadership. (2021). Bhattacharjee, Swadip ; Biswas, Shetu Ranjan ; Dey, Mouri ; Mahmood, Monowar ; Uddin, Md Aftab.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:5:p:2367-2381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A taxonomy of ecopreneurship in small manufacturing firms: A multidimensional cluster analysis. (2021). Ljungkvist, Torbjorn ; Andersen, Jim.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:1374-1388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 22:00:56 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.