create a website

Towards sustainable development: Green supply chain design and planning using monetization methods. (2022). da Silva, Catia ; Barbosapovoa, Ana Paula ; Carvalho, Ana.
In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1369-1394.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 47

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Integrating the Assessment of Environmental Costs and the Non-Energy Benefits of Energy Efficiency into an Energy Demand Analysis of the Tertiary Sector. (2025). Arnold-Keifer, Sonja ; Hirzel, Simon ; Rohde, Clemens.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2354-:d:1649508.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. External Environmental Costs of Solid Biomass Production against the Legal and Political Background in Europe. (2023). Stolarski, Mariusz Jerzy ; Zity, Jakub Jan ; Olba-Zity, Ewelina.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4200-:d:1151292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Ahlroth, S. (2014). The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 85(April), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Ahlroth, S., & Finnveden, G. (2011). Ecovalue08–A new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(17–18), 1994–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bachmann, T. M. (2019). Optimal pollution: The welfare economic approach to correct related market failures. In J. Nriagu (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Health (Second Edition) (pp. 767–777). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09382-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Bagstad, K. J., Semmens, D. J., Waage, S., & Winthrop, R. (2013). A comparative assessment of decision‐support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 5(September), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004.

  5. Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P., da Silva, C., & Carvalho, A. (2018). Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(2), 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2017.10.036.

  6. Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., & Weimer, D. (2006). Cost‐Benefit Analysis Concepts and Practice (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Cardoso, S. R., Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P. F. D., & Relvas, S. (2013). Design and planning of supply chains with integration of reverse logistics activities under demand uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.035.

  8. Castellani, V., Benini, L., Sala, S., & Pant, R. (2016). A distance‐to‐target weighting method for Europe 2020. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(8), 1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1079-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Chen, W., & Holden, N. M. (2018). Bridging environmental and financial cost of dairy production: A case study of irish agricultural policy. Science of the Total Environment, 615(February), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.310.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Chen, Y., Singhal, V., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Environmental policies and financial performance: stock market reaction to firms for their proactive environmental practices recognized by governmental programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2693.

  11. da Silva, C., Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P., & Carvalho, A. (2018). Sustainable supply chain: Monetization of environmental impacts. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (Vol. 43, pp. 773–778). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64235-6.50136-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. da Silva, C., Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P., & Carvalho, A. (2019). Green supply chain: Integrating financial risk measures while monetizing environmental impacts. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (Vol. 46, pp. 1549–1554). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50259-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. da Silva, C., Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P., & Carvalho, A. (2020). Environmental monetization and risk assessment in supply chain design and planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270(October), 121552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121552.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. European Commission. (2010). Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed Guidance. Publications Office of the European Union.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. European Commission. (2013). “Commission recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations.”.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Franco, C., & Alfonso‐Lizarazo, E. (2020). Optimization under Uncertainty of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain in Hospitals. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 135(April), 106689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106689.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Handfield, R., Sroufe, R., & Walton, S. (2005). Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.422.

  18. Heijungs, R., Guinée, J., Kleijn, R., & Rovers, V. (2007). Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12(4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.07.260.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Herendeen, R. A. (1998). Monetary‐costing environmental services: Nothing is lost, something is gained. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00010-X.

  20. Hu, D., Qiu, L., She, M., & Wang, Y. (2021). Sustaining the sustainable development: How do firms turn government green subsidies into financial performance through green innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2271–2292. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2746.

  21. Huppes, G., & Van Oers, L. (2011). Background Review of Existing Weighting Approaches in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978–92–79‐21751‐7, ISSN 1831–9424.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Imbrogiano, J.‐P., & Nichols, E. (2021). How to serve sustainability performance in businesses? An appetizing recipe to link practices to performance in business sustainability research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1610–1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2697.

  23. Jeswani, H. K., Azapagic, A., Schepelmann, P., & Ritthoff, M. (2010). Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Kong, T., Feng, T., & Huo, B. (2021). Green supply chain integration and financial performance: A social contagion and information sharing perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2255–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2745.

  25. Kostin, A., Macowski, D. H., Pietrobelli, J. M. T. A., Guillén‐Gosálbez, G., Jiménez, L., & Ravagnani, M. A. S. S. (2018). Optimization‐based approach for maximizing profitability of bioethanol supply chain in Brazil. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 115(July), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.04.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Lattemann, S., & El‐Habr, H. N. (2009). UNEP resource and guidance manual for environmental impact assessment of desalination projects. Desalination and Water Treatment, 3(1–3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.463.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Li, C., Zhu, Q., & Geng, Z. (2007). Multi‐objective particle swarm optimization hybrid algorithm: An application on industrial cracking furnace. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46(11), 3602–3609. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie051084t.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Lim, S.‐R., Kim, Y. R., Woo, S. H., Park, D., & Park, J. M. (2013). System optimization for eco‐design by using monetization of environmental impacts: A strategy to convert bi‐objective to single‐objective problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39(January), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.040.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Ludwig, D. (2000). Limitations of economic valuation of ecosystems. Ecosystems, 3(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Mota, E., Alexandra, B., de Sousa Gouveia Carvalho, A. I. C., Gomes, M. I. A. R., & Barbosa‐Povoa, A. P. F. D. (2020). Business strategy for sustainable development: Impact of life cycle inventory and life cycle impact assessment steps in supply chain design and planning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Nations, United. 2018. “The sustainable development goals report 2018.” 2018. http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2018‐EN.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Nguyen, T. H. H., Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., & Yue, W. (2021). Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(30), 2313–2331. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2748.

  33. Pearce, D., & Susanna, M. (2006). The foundations of cost‐benefit analysis. In Cost‐benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments (314 pp.). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010055‐en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Pennington, D. W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T., & Rebitzer, G. (2004). Life cycle assessment part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environment International, 30(5), 721–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Pinto‐Varela, T., Martins, F., & Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. (2012). Integrating economic and environmental aspects in the design and planning of supply chains: Two alternative methodologies. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 30, 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59519-5.50023-X.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Pizzol, M., Weidema, B., Brandão, M., & Osset, P. (2015). Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86(January), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Ripa, M., Fiorentino, G., Vacca, V., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). The relevance of site‐specific data in life cycle assessment (LCA). The case of the municipal solid waste management in the metropolitan city of Naples (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(January), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.149.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Sajjad, A., Eweje, G., & Tappin, D. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management: Motivators and barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(7), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1898.

  39. Soares, S. R., Toffoletto, L., & Deschênes, L. (2006). Development of weighting factors in the context of LCIA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(6–7), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Speck, R., Selke, S., Auras, R., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2016). Life cycle assessment software: Selection can impact results. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12245.

  41. Steen, B. (1999). A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000–General system characteristics. CPM Report, Centre for Environmental Assessment of Products and Material Systems.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. The Gallup Organisation. (2009). “Europeans' attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production.”.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Udo de Haes, H. A., Jolliet, O., Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M., Krewitt, W., & Müller‐Wenk, R. (1999). Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 4(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979403.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Vogtländer, J. G., Brezet, H. C., & Hendriks, C. F. (2001). The virtual Eco‐Costs 99 a single LCA‐based indicator for sustainability and the Eco‐Costs‐Value Ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6(3), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978734.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Weidema, B. P. (2006). The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(S1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Weidema, B. P. (2009). Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1591–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.019.

  47. Zhou, C.‐C., Yin, G.‐F., & Xiao‐Bing, H. (2009). Multi‐objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: Artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Materials & Design, 30(4), 1209–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: A comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain. (2019). Zorrilla-Miras, P ; Maes, J ; Benayas, J ; Palomo, I ; Santos-Martn, F ; Montes, C.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:35:y:2019:i:c:p:43-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Australias Genuine Progress Indicator Revisited (1962–2013). (2019). Thompson, Jonathan ; Josol, Jairus ; Kubiszewski, Ida ; Narulla, Harkiran ; Kenny, Daniel C ; Sutanto, Anna ; Dowsley, Tom ; Sese, Saioa ; Costanza, Robert ; Jackson, Nichelle.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:158:y:2019:i:c:p:1-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Spatially Referenced Decision Analysis of Long-Term Forest Management Scenarios in Southwestern Finland. (2018). Sironen, Susanna ; Mononen, Laura.
    In: Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM).
    RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:20:y:2018:i:03:n:s1464333218500096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis in Environmental Assessment: A Review and Reflection on Benefits and Limitations. (2018). Enriquez-De, Alvaro ; Gonzalez, Ainhoa.
    In: Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM).
    RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:20:y:2018:i:03:n:s146433321840001x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Zoning does not improve the availability of ecosystem services in urban watersheds. A case study from Upstate South Carolina, USA. (2018). Brown, Melanie G ; Quinn, John E.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:34:y:2018:i:pb:p:254-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Valuing the protection services of mangroves at national scale: The Philippines. (2018). Menndez, Pelayo ; Daz-Simal, Pedro ; Beck, Michael W ; Losada, Iigo J ; Lange, Glenn-Marie ; Espejo, Antonio ; Narayan, Siddharth ; Torres-Ortega, Saul.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:34:y:2018:i:pa:p:24-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Future uncertainty in scenarios of ecosystem services provision: Linking differences among narratives and outcomes. (2018). Harma, Zuzana V ; Vaa, David.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pb:p:134-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Using a strength-of-evidence approach to inform choices among alternatives. (2018). Mazzotta, M ; Martin, D M.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pb:p:124-133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Uncertainty analysis in integrated environmental models for ecosystem service assessments: Frameworks, challenges and gaps. (2018). Leopold, Ulrich ; Baustert, Paul ; Othoniel, Benoit ; Rugani, Benedetto.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pb:p:110-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Conceptual advancement of socio-ecological modelling of ecosystem services for re-evaluating Brownfield land. (2018). Mojtahed, Vahid ; Giupponi, Carlo ; Balbi, Stefano ; van Delden, H ; Cadisch, G ; Villa, F ; Kolosz, B W ; Dawson, T P ; Marvuglia, A ; Ogutu, K. B. Z., ; Honzk, M ; Martinez-Lopez, J ; Athanasiadis, I N.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pa:p:29-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Lake-wetland ecosystem services modeling and valuation: Progress, gaps and future directions. (2018). Tan, Yan ; Xu, Xibao ; Costanza, Robert ; Yang, Guishan ; Jiang, BO.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pa:p:19-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: A case study in Belize. (2018). Furley, Peter A ; Stuart, Neil ; Wells, Geoff J ; Ryan, Casey M.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:32:y:2018:i:pa:p:70-77.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Increasing the credibility of expert-based models with preference surveys – Mapping recreation in the riverine zone. (2018). Rabe, Sven-Erik ; Gantenbein, Remo ; Richter, Kai-Florian ; Grt-Regamey, Adrienne.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:31:y:2018:i:pc:p:308-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. (Dis) integrated valuation – Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support. (2018). Berry, P ; Saarikoski, H ; Silaghi, D ; Harrison, P A ; Hendriks, C. M. A., ; Yli-Pelkonen, V J ; Odee, D ; Termansen, M ; Pataki, G ; van der Wal, Tjalling J ; Barton, D N ; Garca-Llorente, M ; Rusch, G M ; Luque, S ; Lapola, D M ; Pastur, Martines G ; Blanco, Garca G ; Jacobs, S ; Martin-Lopez, B ; Carvalho, L ; Turkelboom, F ; Saarela, S-R., ; Vadineanu, A ; van Dijk, J ; Masi, F ; Santos, R ; Langemeyer, J ; Mukhopadhyay, R ; Dick, J ; Primmer, E ; Dunford, R ; Priess, J A ; Kelemen, E ; Mederly, P ; Palomo, I ; Gmez-Baggethun, E.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:529-541.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The means determine the end – Pursuing integrated valuation in practice. (2018). Dunford, Robert ; Rusch, Graciela M ; Harrison, Paula A ; Turkelboom, Francis ; Tenerelli, Patrizia ; Kelemen, Eszter ; Termansen, Mette ; Gmez-Baggethun, Erik ; Garca-Llorente, Marina ; Barton, David N ; Kopperoinen, Leena ; Martn-Lpez, Berta ; Priess, Joerg A ; Luque, Sandra ; Hauck, Jennifer ; Jacobs, Sander ; Palomo, Ignacio ; Smith, Ron ; Saarikoski, Heli ; Demeyer, Rolinde ; Keune, Hans.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:515-528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations. (2018). Smith, Alison ; Ochieng, John ; Rusch, Graciella ; Giuca, Relu ; Howard, Dave ; Langemeyer, Johannes ; Izakovicova, Zita ; Vri, Gnes ; Mukhopadhyay, Raktima ; Grizetti, Bruna ; Priess, Joerg ; Verheyden, Wim ; Conte, Giulio ; Harrison, Paula ; Czcz, Blint ; Hauck, Jennifer ; Yli-Pelkonen, Vesa ; Blanco, Gemma Garcia ; Antunes, Paula ; Martin-Lopez, Berta ; Niemel, Jari ; Roy, S B ; Turkelboom, Francis ; Pinho, Patricia ; Vadineanu, Angheluta ; van der Wal, Jan Tjalling ; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka ; Bar, Francesc ; Berry, Pam ; Dick, Jan ; Luque, Sandra ; Kelemen, Ezsther ; Badea, Ovidu ; Palomo, Ignacio ; Jacobs, Sander ; Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ; Norton, Lisa ; Saarikoski, Heli ; Santos, Rui ; Odee, David ; Kopperoinen, Leena ; Woods, Helen ; Dunford, Rob ; Barton, David N ; Carvalho, Laurence ; Martinez-Pastur, Guillermo ; Aszals, Rka ; Lapola, David M.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:499-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach. (2018). Termansen, Mette ; Tuomasjukka, Diana ; Karlsen, Martin ; Barton, David N ; Garca-Llorente, Marina ; Howard, David ; Norton, Lisa ; Czcz, Blint ; Kopperoinen, Leena ; Martn-Lpez, Berta ; Jacobs, Sander ; Hendriks, Kees ; Madsen, Andes ; Smith, Ron ; Saarikoski, Heli ; Dunford, Rob ; Zulian, Grazia ; Verweij, Peter ; Rusch, Graciela ; Harrison, Paula A ; Kelemen, Eszter ; van Eupen, Michiel ; Gmez-Baggethun, Erik.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:481-498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Knowledge needs for the operationalisation of the concept of ecosystem services. (2018). Steingrver, Eveliene ; Carmen, Esther ; Odee, David ; Izakovicova, Zita ; Liquete, Camino ; Kopperoinen, Leena ; Grizzetti, Bruna ; Carvalho, Laurence ; Watt, Allan ; Young, Juliette ; Hauck, Jennifer ; Dick, Jan ; Fazey, Ioan ; Garcia-Blanco, Gemma.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:441-451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The role of ecosystem services in USA natural resource liability litigation. (2018). Dipinto, Lisa ; Jones, Carol Adaire.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pb:p:333-351.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Improving payments for ecosystem services (PES) outcomes through the use of Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and the software OPTamos. (2018). Singh, Simron J ; Grima, Nelson ; Smetschka, Barbara.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pa:p:47-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Economic viability of the national-scale forestation program: The case of success in the Republic of Korea. (2018). MARKANDYA, ANIL ; Kim, Sea Jin ; Chowdhury, Sarwat ; Lee, Jongyeol ; Lim, Chul-Hee ; Son, Yowhan.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pa:p:40-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Identifying Consensus on Coastal Lagoons Ecosystem Services and Conservation Priorities for an Effective Decision Making: A Q Approach. (2018). Rey-Valette, Hélène ; Figuieres, Charles ; de Wit, Rutger ; Simier, Monique ; Sy, Mariam Maki ; Pasqualini, Vanina.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:154:y:2018:i:c:p:1-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. An Empirical Analysis of Institutional Demand for Valuation Knowledge. (2018). Saarikoski, Heli ; Primmer, Eeva ; Vatn, Arild.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:152-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation. (2017). Whitehouse, Alexander.
    In: Landscape Research.
    RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:42:y:2017:i:2:p:230-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Ecosystem services provision, tourism and climate variability in shallow lakes: The case of La Salada, Buenos Aires, Argentina. (2017). Zilio, Mariana I ; Ferrelli, Federico ; Piccolo, Cintia M ; Alfonso, Belen M.
    In: Tourism Management.
    RePEc:eee:touman:v:62:y:2017:i:c:p:208-217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Evaluation of a visual analytics decision support tool for wind farm placement planning in Alberta: Findings from a focus group study. (2017). Carpendale, Sheelagh ; Levy, Richard M ; Adagha, Ovo ; Lindquist, Mark ; Gates, Cormack .
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:117:y:2017:i:c:p:70-83.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. (2017). Costanza, Robert ; Sutton, Paul ; Grasso, Monica ; Fioramonti, Lorenzo ; Braat, Leon ; Kubiszewski, Ida ; Farber, Steve ; de Groot, Rudolf.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:28:y:2017:i:pa:p:1-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Investigating trade-offs between water quality and agricultural productivity using the Land Utilisation and Capability Indicator (LUCI)–A New Zealand application. (2017). Trodahl, Martha I ; Deslippe, Julie R ; Jackson, Bethanna M ; Metherell, Alister K.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:26:y:2017:i:pb:p:388-399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional planning and development. (2017). Mustajrvi, Kaisa ; Rasinmki, Jussi ; Tammi, Ilpo.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:26:y:2017:i:pb:p:329-344.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept. (2017). Brunner, Sibyl Hanna ; Sirn, Elina ; Weibel, Bettina ; Grt-Regamey, Adrienne.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:26:y:2017:i:pb:p:306-315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. What are the benefits of strictly protected nature reserves? Rapid assessment of ecosystem service values in Wanglang Nature Reserve, China. (2017). Li, Yunxi ; Jiang, Shiwei ; Zhang, Pingping ; Liu, Peng ; Zhao, Lianjun.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:26:y:2017:i:pa:p:70-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Rapid Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services (RAWES): An example from Colombo, Sri Lanka. (2017). McInnes, R J ; Everard, M.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:25:y:2017:i:c:p:89-105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach. (2017). Verheyen, Kris ; van der Biest, Katrien ; Staes, Jan ; Liekens, Inge ; Vrebos, Dirk ; Olivier, Beauchard ; Broekx, Steven ; Meire, Patrick ; Jeroen, Panis ; Poelmans, Lien ; de Nocker, Leo.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:24:y:2017:i:c:p:124-137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Modeling of natural and social capital on farms: Toward useable integration. (2017). Kenny, Daniel C.
    In: Ecological Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:1-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: A first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France. (2016). Levrel, Harold ; Cabral, Pedro ; Chambolle, Mlodie ; Basque, Damien ; Feger, Clment.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pb:p:318-327.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A proposed framework for assessing ecosystem goods and services from planted forests. (2016). Keenan, Rodney J ; Guariguata, Manuel R ; Baral, Himlal.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pb:p:260-268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. (2016). Zulkafli, Z ; Buytaert, W ; Karpouzoglou, T ; Mao, F ; Hannah, D M ; Pandeya, B.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pb:p:250-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services. (2016). Stevens, Sharon M ; van den Belt, Marjan.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pa:p:60-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa. (2016). Sitas, Nadia ; Hudson, Malcolm D ; Bullock, James M ; Eigenbrod, Felix ; Hooftman, Danny ; Reyers, Belinda ; Willcock, Simon ; Oafarrell, Patrick.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:18:y:2016:i:c:p:110-117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A combination of methods needed to assess the actual use of provisioning ecosystem services. (2016). Xaydongvanh, Pheang ; Mertz, Ole ; Dawson, Neil ; Rasmussen, Laura Vang ; Danielsen, Finn ; Christensen, Andreas E.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:17:y:2016:i:c:p:75-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Assessing ecosystem impacts on health: A tool review. (2016). Martens, Pim ; de Kraker, Joop ; Oosterbroek, Bram.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:17:y:2016:i:c:p:237-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Meeting local economic decision-makers demand for environmental evidence: The Local Environment and Economic Development (LEED) toolkit. (2016). Butterworth, Tom ; Sunderland, Tim.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:17:y:2016:i:c:p:197-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Global use of ecosystem service models. (2016). Ricketts, Taylor ; Posner, Stephen ; Koh, Insu ; Verutes, Gregory ; Denu, Doug.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:17:y:2016:i:c:p:131-141.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration. (2016). Turner, Graham ; Ogilvy, Sue ; Svenning, Jens-Christian ; Wratten, Stephen ; Kubiszewski, Ida ; Anderson, Sharolyn ; Sandhu, Harpinder ; Courville, Sasha ; Costanza, Robert ; Dominati, Estelle ; Voinov, Alexey ; Sutton, Paul C ; Ratna, Nazmun ; Gonzales-Chang, Mauricio ; Varennes, Yann-David ; Porfirio, Luciana ; Dalgaard, Tommy.
    In: Ecological Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:319:y:2016:i:c:p:190-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A Conceptual Approach to Promote the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Strategic Environmental Assessment. (2015). Geneletti, Davide.
    In: Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM).
    RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:17:y:2015:i:04:n:s1464333215500350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. EnviroAtlas: A new geospatial tool to foster ecosystem services science and resource management. (2015). Mehaffey, Megan ; Jackson, Laura E ; Daniel, Jessica ; Pickard, Brian R ; Neale, Anne.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:14:y:2015:i:c:p:45-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward. (2015). Crossman, N D ; Willemen, L ; Maes, J ; Palomo, I ; Drakou, E G ; Burkhard, B ; Peedell, S.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:13:y:2015:i:c:p:134-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. (2015). Loomis, John ; Kroeger, Timm ; Richardson, Leslie ; Casey, Frank .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:115:y:2015:i:c:p:51-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. (2014). Hayha, Tiina ; Franzese, Pier Paolo.
    In: Ecological Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:289:y:2014:i:c:p:124-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The strange case of cultural services: Limits of the ecosystem services paradigm. (2014). Winthrop, Robert H..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:208-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 08:11:41 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.