- Abduh, M., D'Souza, C., Quazi, A., & Burley, H. T. (2007). Investigating and classifying clients' satisfaction with business incubator services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17, 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710720683.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adedeji, P. A., Akinlabi, S. A., Madushele, N., & Olatunji, O. O. (2020). Neuro‐fuzzy resource forecast in site suitability assessment for wind and solar energy: A mini review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122104.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adlešič, R. V., & Slavec, A. (2012). Social capital and business incubators performance: Testing the structural model. Economics and Business Review, 14, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1227.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ahmad, A. J. (2014). A mechanisms‐driven theory of business incubation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 20, 375–405.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Albort‐Morant, G., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1775–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.054.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Amezcua, A. S. (2010). Performance analysis of entrepreneurship policy: Which business incubators generate the highest levels of economic performance? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30, 1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Anjomshoae, A., Hassan, A., Wong, K. Y., & Banomyong, R. (2021). An integrated multi‐stage fuzzy inference performance measurement scheme in humanitarian relief operations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 61, 102298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102298.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Asiaei, K., Jusoh, R., Barani, O., & Asiaei, A. (2022). How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2971.
Ayatse, F. A., Kwahar, N., & Iyortsuun, A. S. (2017). Business incubation process and firm performance: An empirical review. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-016-0059-6.
Azadnia, A. H., Saman, M. Z. M., & Wong, K. Y. (2015). Sustainable supplier selection and order lot‐sizing: An integrated multi‐objective decision‐making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.935827.
- Bai, C., Dhavale, D., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Integrating fuzzy C‐means and TOPSIS for performance evaluation: An application and comparative analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 4186–4196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.037.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bakır, M., & Atalık, Ö. (2021). Application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS approach for the evaluation of e‐service quality in the airline industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4, 127–152. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104127b.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baraldi, E., & Havenvid, M. I. (2016). Identifying new dimensions of business incubation: A multi‐level analysis of Karolinska Institute's incubation system. Technovation, 50, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.003.
- Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Ramos, A., & Guitar, S. (2012). Revisiting incubation performance: How incubator typology affects results. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 888–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Binsawad, M., Sohaib, O., & Hawryszkiewycz, I. (2019). Factors impacting technology business incubator performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23, 1950007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500075.
- Blanck, M., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Anzanello, M. J. (2019). A relational exploratory study of business incubation and smart cities‐findings from Europe. Cities, 88, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.032.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Breivik‐Meyer, M., Arntzen‐Nordqvist, M., & Alsos, G. A. (2020). The role of incubator support in new firms accumulation of resources and capabilities. Innovations, 22, 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1684204.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Canovas‐Saiz, L., March‐Chordà, I., & Yagüe‐Perales, R. M. (2021). A quantitative‐based model to assess seed accelerators' performance. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 33, 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1872941.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chang, D.‐Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
Chen, Y., Wang, S., Yao, J., Li, Y., & Yang, S. (2018). Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1708–1719. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2236.
Czinkota, M. R., & Ronkainen, I. A. (2005). A forecast of globalization, international business and trade: Report from a Delphi study. Journal of World Business, 40, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.02.006.
- Dahooie, J. H., Mohammadi, N., Meidutė‐Kavaliauskienė, I., & Binkytė‐Vėlienė, A. (2021). A novel performance evaluation framework for new service development in the healthcare industry using hybrid ISM and ANP. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27, 1481–1508. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15699.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- de Felice, F., Deldoost, M. H., & Faizollahi, M. (2015). Performance measurement model for the supplier selection based on AHP. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 7, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.5772/61702.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Digalwar, A., Raut, R. D., Yadav, V. S., Narkhede, B., Gardas, B. B., & Gotmare, A. (2020). Evaluation of critical constructs for measurement of sustainable supply chain practices in lean‐agile firms of Indian origin: A hybrid ISM‐ANP approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1575–1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2455.
- Enterprise Ireland. (2021). Leading in a Changing World, Strategy 2022‐2024. https://www.enterprise-ireland.com/.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. (2017). How network‐based incubation helps start‐up performance: A systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9510-7.
Fernández Fernández, M. T., Blanco Jiménez, F. J., & Cuadrado Roura, J. R. (2015). Business incubation: Innovative services in an entrepreneurship ecosystem. Service Industries Journal, 35, 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1080243.
- Games, D., Kartika, R., Sari, D. K., & Assariy, A. (2020). Business incubator effectiveness and commercialization strategy: A thematic analysis. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0067.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ghadimi, P., Dargi, A., & Heavey, C. (2017). Sustainable supplier performance scoring using audition check‐list based fuzzy inference system: A case application in automotive spare part industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 105, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gök‐Kısa, A. C., Çeli̇k, P., & Peker, İ. (2021). Performance evaluation of privatized ports by entropy based TOPSIS and ARAS approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29, 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0554.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Govindan, K., Dhingra Darbari, J., Kaul, A., & Jha, P. (2021). Structural model for analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturer–supplier collaboration: A grey‐decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory‐based approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 1702–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2703.
- Gozali, L., Masrom, M., Zagloel, T. Y., Haron, H. N., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., & Tjahjono, B. (2020). Final framework for a successful business incubator for Indonesian public universities: The influence of information technology on business incubator success. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Interdisciplinary approaches to digital transformation and innovation (pp. 70–98). IGI Global.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Guru, S., & Mahalik, D. (2019). A comparative study on performance measurement of Indian public sector banks using AHP‐TOPSIS and AHP‐grey relational analysis. Opsearch, 56, 1213–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00411-1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.
Haleem, A., Khan, S., Luthra, S., Varshney, H., Alam, M., & Khan, M. I. (2021). Supplier evaluation in the context of circular economy: A forward step for resilient business and environment concern. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2119–2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2736.
- Harper‐Anderson, E., & Lewis, D. A. (2018). What makes business incubation work? Measuring the influence of incubator quality and regional capacity on incubator outcomes. Economic Development Quarterly, 32, 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417741961.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hasani, T., & O'Reilly, N. (2020). Analyzing antecedents affecting the organizational performance of start‐up businesses. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13, 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2019-0116.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. (2020). Business incubators and accelerators: A co‐citation analysis‐based, systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9651-y.
- Hausberg, P., & Korreck, S. (2018). Analysis‐based, systematic literature review. Speedboating into the future‐how organizations use open foresight and business incubation as strategic means to explore trends and promote innovation (p. 114).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hillemane, B. S. M., Satyanarayana, K., & Chandrashekar, D. (2019). Technology business incubation for start‐up generation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 25, 1471–1493.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- İç, Y. T., & Yurdakul, M. (2020). Development of a new trapezoidal fuzzy AHP‐TOPSIS hybrid approach for manufacturing firm performance measurement. Granular Computing, 6(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00238-y.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ikram, M., Zhang, Q., & Sroufe, R. (2020). Developing integrated management systems using an AHP‐fuzzy VIKOR approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 2265–2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2501.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ishizaka, A., & Resce, G. (2021). Best‐worst PROMETHEE method for evaluating school performance in the OECD's PISA project. Socio‐Economic Planning Sciences, 73, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100799.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Iyortsuun, A. S. (2017). An empirical analysis of the effect of business incubation process on firm performance in Nigeria. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 29(6), 433–459.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jasiulewicz‐Kaczmarek, M., Żywica, P., & Gola, A. (2021). Fuzzy set theory driven maintenance sustainability performance assessment model: A multiple criteria approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01734-3.
Kilic, H. S., & Yalcin, A. S. (2021). Comparison of municipalities considering environmental sustainability via neutrosophic DEMATEL based TOPSIS. Socio‐Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100827.
- Kiran, R., & Bose, S. (2020). Stimulating business incubation performance: Role of networking, university linkage and facilities. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32, 1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1772967.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lai, W.‐H., & Lin, C.‐C. (2015). Constructing business incubation service capabilities for tenants at post‐entrepreneurial phase. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2285–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.012.
- Lamine, W. (2017). The social network and entrepreneurial process: A sociotechnical approach. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21907.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Leendertse, J., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Eveleens, C. P. (2021). The sustainable start‐up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start‐ups. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2667.
Liu, X., Yu, X., & Gao, S. (2019). A quantitative study of financing efficiency of low‐carbon companies: A three‐stage data envelopment analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 858–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2288.
Liu, Y. (2020). The micro‐foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120294.
Lukeš, M., Longo, M. C., & Zouhar, J. (2019). Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start‐ups. Technovation, 82, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.07.008.
- Martínez‐Fierro, S., Biedma‐Ferrer, J. M., & Ruiz‐Navarro, J. (2020). Impact of high‐growth start‐ups on entrepreneurial environment based on the level of national economic development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2413.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Messeghem, K., Bakkali, C., Sammut, S., & Swalhi, A. (2018). Measuring nonprofit incubator performance: Toward an adapted balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 56, 658–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12317.
Messeghem, K., Sammut, S., Gangloff, F., & Bakkali, C. (2017). Performance measurement of French incubators. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 30(1), 4–21.
Mrkajic, B. (2017). Business incubation models and institutionally void environments. Technovation, 68, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.09.001.
Nair, S., & Blomquist, T. (2021). Exploring docility: A behavioral approach to interventions in business incubation. Research Policy, 50, 104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104274.
- Ng, W. K. B., Appel‐Meulenbroek, R., Cloodt, M., & Arentze, T. (2021). Perceptual measures of science parks: Tenant firms' associations between science park attributes and benefits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120408.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pachar, N., Darbari, J. D., Govindan, K., & Jha, P. (2021). Sustainable performance measurement of Indian retail chain using two‐stage network DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 6, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04088-y.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pergelova, A., & Angulo‐Ruiz, F. (2014). The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: The role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26, 663–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.980757.
- Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., & Emrouznejad, A. (2021). An adjustable fuzzy chance‐constrained network DEA approach with application to ranking investment firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 166, 113938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113938.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001.
- Pinheiro, M. A. P., Jugend, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Latan, H. (2021). Circular economy‐based new products and company performance: The role of stakeholders and industry 4.0 technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2905.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pourjavad, E., & Mayorga, R. V. (2019). A comparative study and measuring performance of manufacturing systems with Mamdani fuzzy inference system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30, 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1307-5.
- Prabhu, M., Abdullah, N. N., Ahmed, R. R., Nambirajan, T., & Pandiyan, S. (2020). Segmenting the manufacturing industries and measuring the performance: Using interval‐valued triangular fuzzy TOPSIS method. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 6, 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00157-0.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rouyendegh, B. D., Yildizbasi, A., & Yilmaz, I. (2020). Evaluation of retail ındustry performance ability through ıntegrated ıntuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS and data envelopment analysis approach. Soft Computing, 24, 12255–12266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04669-2.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.
Sagath, D., van Burg, E., Cornelissen, J. P., & Giannopapa, C. (2019). Identifying design principles for business incubation in the European space sector. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, e00115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00115.
- Sánchez‐Villar, J., & Bigné, E. (2020). Developing a blog trust scale via an international Delphi panel. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.07.003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schwartz, M., & Göthner, M. (2009). A multidimensional evaluation of the effectiveness of business incubators: An application of the PROMETHEE outranking method. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 27, 1072–1087. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0897b.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology‐based firms: A review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022268100133.
- Smith, M., & Bititci, U. S. (2017). Interplay between performance measurement and management, employee engagement and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37, 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0313.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sridharan, M. (2021). Application of Mamdani fuzzy inference system in predicting the thermal performance of solar distillation still. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 10305–10319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02810-5.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stephens, S., & Lyons, R. M. (2022). The changing activities of business incubation clients: An Irish case study. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, ahead‐of‐print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2021-0016.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stephens, S., & Onofrei, G. (2012). Measuring business incubation outcomes: An Irish case study. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 13, 277–285. https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2012.0094.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Surana, K., Singh, A., & Sagar, A. D. (2020). Strengthening science, technology, and innovation‐based incubators to help achieve sustainable development goals: Lessons from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120057.
- Teruel‐Sánchez, R., Briones‐Peñalver, A. J., Bernal‐Conesa, J. A., & de Nieves‐Nieto, C. (2021). Influence of the entrepreneur's capacity in business performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2453–2467. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2757.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Theodorakopoulos, N., Kakabadse, N. K., & McGowan, C. (2014). What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorising. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21, 602–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2014-0152.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Torun, M., Peconick, L., Sobreiro, V., Kimura, H., & Pique, J. (2018). Assessing business incubation: A review on benchmarking. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tseng, M., Lim, M. K., & Wu, K. (2018). Corporate sustainability performance improvement using an interrelationship hierarchical model approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2182.
- Van Horenbeek, A., & Pintelon, L. (2014). Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—Using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.02.006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Voisey, P., Gornall, L., Jones, P., & Thomas, B. (2006). The measurement of success in a business incubation project. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13, 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000610680307.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wang, Z., He, Q., Xia, S., Sarpong, D., Xiong, A., & Maas, G. (2020). Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120125.
- Yaghoobi, T., & Haddadi, F. (2016). Organizational performance measurement by a framework integrating BSC and AHP. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65, 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2015-0001.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- You, W., Chen, W., Agyapong, M., & Mordi, C. (2020). The business model of do‐it‐yourself (DIY) laboratories–a triple‐layered perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120205.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Yu, A., Shi, Y., You, J., & Zhu, J. (2021). Innovation performance evaluation for high‐tech companies using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 292, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.011.
- Yurdakul*, M., & Ic, Y. T. (2005). Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 4609–4641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500161746.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now