1. Green patents and green trademarks as indicators of green innovation. (2025). Cucculelli, Marco ; Lambrecht, Darius ; Block, Jrn ; Meloni, Damiano ; Willeke, Tom.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:1:s0048733324001872.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Afeltra, G., Alerasoul, S. A., & Strozzi, F. (2021). The evolution of sustainable innovation: From the past to the future. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28, 1556–1580. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2021-0799.

2. Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1.

3. Athreye, S., & Fassio, C. (2020). Why do innovators not apply for trademarks? The role of information asymmetries and collaborative innovation. Industry and Innovation, 27(1–2), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1616533.

4. Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002.

5. Blind, K., Edler, J., Schmoch, U., Andersen, B., Howells, J., Miles, I., Roberts, J., Green, L., Onlus, C., Onlus, L., Evangelista, R., Hipp, C., & Herstatt, C. (2003). Patents in the service industries, final report prepared for the European Commission. Fraunhofer ISI.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., Hahn, A., & Sandner, P. G. (2015). Why do SMEs file trademarks? Insights from firms in innovative industries. Research Policy, 44(10), 1915–1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002.

7. Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Bos‐Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.652.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Cappa, F., Franco, S., & Rosso, F. (2022). Citizens and cities: Leveraging citizen science and big data for sustainable urban development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2942.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Capponi, G., Criscuolo, P., Martinelli, A., & Nuvolari, A. (2019). Profiting from innovation: Evidence from a survey of Queen's Awards winners. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.02.002.

11. Castaldi, C. (2018). To trademark or not to trademark: The case of the creative and cultural industries. Research Policy, 47(3), 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.006.

12. Castaldi, C. (2021). Sustainable innovation and intellectual property rights: friends, foes or perfect strangers? In C. L. Voinea, N. Roijakkers, & W. Ooms (Eds.), Sustainable innovation: Strategy, process and impact. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299506.

13. Castaldi, C., Block, J., & Flikkema, M. J. (2019). Editorial: Why and when do firms trademark? Bridging perspectives from industrial organisation, innovation and entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 27(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1685376.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Castellacci, F., & Lie, C. M. (2017). A taxonomy of green innovators: Empirical evidence from South Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Cillo, V., Petruzzelli, A. M., Ardito, L., & Del Giudice, M. (2019). Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1783.

16. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). Working Paper 7552. National Bureau of Economic Research Inc.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Corrocher, N., & Solito, I. (2017). How do firms capture value from environmental innovations? An empirical analysis on European SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 24(5), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1302792.

18. D'Angelo, V., Cappa, F., & Peruffo, E. (2022). Green manufacturing for sustainable development: The positive effects of green activities, green investments, and non‐green products on economic performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1900–1913. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3226.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Díaz‐García, C., González‐Moreno, Á., & Sáez‐Martínez, F. J. (2015). Eco‐innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation, 17(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Economides, N. S. (1988). The economics of trademarks. The Trademark Reporter, 78, 523–539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Eppinger, E., Jain, A., Vimalnath, P., Gurtoo, A., Tietze, F., & Hernandez Chea, R. (2021). Sustainability transitions in manufacturing: The role of intellectual property. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. European Commission. (2015). The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe. European Commission. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/290771/reporting.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. European Commission. (2020). Unleashing the full potential of European SMEs. European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/fs_20_426.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. European Commission. (2021). SME definition. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/sme-definition_en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. European Patent Office. (2022). European patent applications. European Patent Office. Retrieved April 24, 2023, from https://www.epo.org/about-us/annual-reports-statistics/statistics/2021/statistics/patent-applications.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. European Patent Office. (n.d.). European patents and the grant procedure. Universal Medien GmbH. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.epo.org/applying/basics.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. European Union Intellectual Property Office (n.d.). What can be an EU trade mark. European Union Intellectual Property Office. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/what-can-be-an-eu-trade-mark.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Flikkema, M. J., de Man, A. P., & Wolters, M. (2010). New trademark registration as an indicator of innovation: Results of an explorative study of Benelux trademark data. Series research memorandum, 2010‐9 (pp. 1–53). Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

31. Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., de Man, A. P., & Seip, M. (2019). Trademarks' relatedness to product and service innovation: A branding strategy approach. Research Policy, 48(6), 1340–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.018.

32. Flikkema, M., de Man, A. P., & Castaldi, C. (2014). Are trademark counts a valid indicator of innovation? Results of an in‐depth study of new Benelux trademarks filed by SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003147442-4.

33. Gallié, E. P., & Legros, D. (2012). French firms' strategies for protecting their intellectual property. Research Policy, 41(4), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. George, G., Howard‐Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Graham, S. J., Merges, R. P., Samuelson, P., & Sichelman, T. (2009). High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: Results of the 2008 Berkeley patent survey. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 24(4), 1255–1327. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1429049.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375–423. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17983.

38. Hannah, D. R. (2006). Keeping trade secrets secret. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124715.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Higgins, B. W. (2003). Adding business value: A strategy for identifying and patenting environment‐related inventions and avoiding patent infringement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.349.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00044-9.

42. Holgersson, M., & Granstrand, O. (2017). Patenting motives, technology strategies, and open innovation. Management Decision, 55, 1265–1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2016-0233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen, P., Sainio, L. M., & Jauhiainen, T. (2008). Appropriability regime for radical and incremental innovations. R&D Management, 38(3), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00512.x-i1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. James, S. D., Leiblein, M. J., & Lu, S. (2013). How firms capture value from their innovations. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1123–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488211.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco‐innovation (Vol. 10(2), pp. 1–120). UM Merit.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Keupp, M. M., Lhuillery, S., Garcia‐Torres, M. A., & Raffo, J. (2009). Economic focus study on SMEs and intellectual property in Switzerland. 2nd report of the IPI SME‐IP project. Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Bermont Diaz, L., Kloke‐Lesch, A., Koundouri, P., & Riccaboni, A. (2022). Achieving the SDGs: Europe's compass in a multipolar world. Europe sustainable development report 2022. SDSN and SDSN Europe. Retrieved from https://eu-dashboards.sdgindex.org/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Leiponen, A., & Byma, J. (2009). If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38(9), 1478–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003.

50. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 18(3), 783–832.

51. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First‐mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090706.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. McEvily, S. K., & Chakravarthy, B. (2002). The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. McLellan, E., MacQueen, K., & Neidig, J. (2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x02239573.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Merlin‐Brogniart, C., Fuglsang, L., Magnussen, S., Peralta, A., Révész, É., Rønning, R., Rubalcaba, L., & Scupola, A. (2022). Social innovation and public service: A literature review of multi‐actor collaborative approaches in five European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121826.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Mignon, I., & Bankel, A. (2022). Sustainable business models and innovation strategies to realize them: A review of 87 empirical cases. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1–16), 1357–1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3192.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Miric, M., Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2019). Protecting their digital assets: The use of formal & informal appropriability strategies by app developers. Research Policy, 48(8), 103738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Morales, P., Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., & de Man, A. P. (2022). The effectiveness of appropriation mechanisms for sustainable innovations from small and medium‐sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374, 133921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133921.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145.

59. Neuhäusler, P. (2012). The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms—Differences between sectors and among companies. Technovation, 32(12), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.07.004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Patricio, J., Axelsson, L., Blomé, S., & Rosado, L. (2018). Enabling industrial symbiosis collaborations between SMEs from a regional perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 1120–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.230.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Ramello, G. B. (2006). What's in a sign? Trademark law and economic theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00255.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
62. Sabbaghi, M., Esmaeilian, B., Cade, W., Wiens, K., & Behdad, S. (2016). Business outcomes of product repairability: A survey‐based study of consumer repair experiences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.

64. Science for Environment Policy. (2020). Eco‐innovation in SMEs. Brief produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit. UWE. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Sichelman, T., & Graham, S. J. (2010). Patenting by entrepreneurs: An empirical study. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 17(1), 111–180.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.

67. Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Thomä, J., & Bizer, K. (2013). To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector. Research Policy, 42(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.019.

69. Triguero, A., Moreno‐Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2016). Leaders and laggards in environmental innovation: An empirical analysis of SMEs in Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1854.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
70. Vimalnath, P., Tietze, F., Jain, A., & Prifti, V. (2020). IP strategies for Green innovations—An analysis of European inventor awards. Centre for Technology Management working paper series. University of Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
71. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.‐a). Patents. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
72. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.‐b). World Trade Organization (WTO)—Agreement on trade‐related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS agreement) (1994) World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/details/231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.‐c). Trademarks. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://www.wipo.int/trademarks/en/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
74. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.‐d). Madrid system—The international trademark system World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

76. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.76.

77. Zobel, A. K., Lokshin, B., & Hagedoorn, J. (2017). Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness. Technovation, 59, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.10.001.

1. Maturity assessment of green patent clusters: Methodological implications. (2024). Walrave, Bob ; Tur, Elena M ; Roca, Jaime Bonnin ; Mazaheri, Maryam ; Markus, Arjan.
   In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
   RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524006115.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Why use or forgo formal and informal appropriation mechanisms? A qualitative study of sustainable innovations from small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises. (2024). Morales, Pablo ; Flikkema, Meindert ; Castaldi, Carolina ; de Man, Ardpieter.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:1937-1961.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Intellectual property rights and efficient firm organization. (2014). Ponzetto, Giacomo.
   In: Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:upf:upfgen:1254.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Innovative start-up patenting: a new approach towards identification and determinants. (2013). Wolf, Tina.
   In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
   RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2013-023.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Quantity or quality? Collaboration strategies in research and development and incentives to patent. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy.
   In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:zbw:zewdip:12047.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Compulsory licensing: the foundations of an institutional innovation. (2012). antonelli, cristiano.
   In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series.
   RePEc:uto:labeco:201207.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Economics of IP in the context of a Middle Income Country. (2012). Goya, Daniel ; Benavente, Jose Miguel.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp350.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Quantity or Quality? Collaboration Strategies in Research and Development and Incentives to Patent. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO ; Hanna, Hottenrott.
   In: LISER Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:irs:cepswp:2012-29.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. “What Drives the Choice of Partners in R&D Cooperation? Heterogeneity across Sectors”. (2012). Moreno, Rosina ; Badillo Enciso, Erika.
   In: IREA Working Papers.
   RePEc:ira:wpaper:201213.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Regional innovation policy and innovative behaviours. A propensity score matching evaluation. (2012). Montresor, Sandro ; Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonioli, Davide.
    In: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ing:wpaper:201205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Family Firms and Regional Innovation Activity: Evidence from the German Mittelstand. (2011). Block, Joern ; Spiegel, Frank.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:28604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Do firms rely on sources of information for organizational innovation?. (2011). Nguyen-Thi, Thuc Uyen ; Mothe, Caroline ; NGUYEN Thi Thuc Uyen, ; Caroline, Mothe .
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2011-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Knowledge appropriability, firm size, and growth. (2011). Minniti, Antonio.
    In: Journal of Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:33:y:2011:i:3:p:438-454.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Collaboration and contracting out versus funding and support – Impact on the propensity to patent of Canadian biotechnology firms 1999-2005. (2011). Beaudry, Catherine.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2011s-62.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Innovation andCooperation: Evidences from the Brazilian Innovation Survey. (2011). kupfer, david ; Avellar, Ana Paula.
    In: Anais do XXXVII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 37th Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2009:151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Are Patent Laws Harmful to Developing Countries? Evidence from China. (2010). Fleisher, Belton ; Zhou, MI.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:osu:osuewp:09-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Innovative Activity in Wind and Solar Technology: Empirical Evidence on Knowledge Spillovers Using Patent Data. (2010). Zloczysti, Petra ; Schmidt-Ehmcke, Jens ; Braun, Frauke.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Intellectual property in a knowledge-based economy : Patents to include vs. patents to exclude.. (2009). Pénin, Julien ; Cohendet, Patrick ; Farcot, Matthieu ; Penin, Julien.
    In: Working Papers of BETA.
    RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2009-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Languages, Fees and the International Scope of Patenting. (2009). van Pottelsberghe de la Potter, Bruno ; Harhoff, Dietmar.
    In: Discussion Papers in Business Administration.
    RePEc:lmu:msmdpa:10456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Languages, Fees and the International Scope of Patenting. (2009). van Pottelsberghe de la Potter, Bruno ; Harhoff, Dietmar ; Bruno van Potteslberghe de la Potterie, .
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2009_016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Languages, Fees and the International Scope of Patenting. (2009). van Pottelsberghe de la Potter, Bruno ; Harhoff, Dietmar.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. The interaction between patents and other appropriability mechanisms: firm-level evidence from UK manufacturing. (2008). Barros, Henrique M..
    In: Insper Working Papers.
    RePEc:ibm:ibmecp:wpe_105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. A Policy Insight into the R&D-Patent Relationship. (2008). van Pottelsberghe de la Potter, Bruno ; de Rassenfosse, Gaétan.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2008_007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Open Source Software, Closed Source Software or Both: Impacts on Industry Growth and the Role of Intellectual Property Rights. (2008). Engelhardt, Sebastian ; swaminathan, sushmita.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A Policy Insight into the R&D-Patent Relationship. (2008). van Pottelsberghe de la Potter, Bruno ; de Rassenfosse, Gaétan.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6716.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Defensive Publishing An Empirical Study. (2008). Henkel, Joachim ; Pangerl, Stefanie.
    In: DRUID Working Papers.
    RePEc:aal:abbswp:08-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The Influence of Strategic Patenting on Companies Patent Portfolios. (2007). Mueller, Elisabeth ; Cremers, Katrin ; Blind, Knut.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:5501.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Location advantages and subsidiaries’ R&D activities in emerging economies: Exploring the effect of employee mobility. (2007). .
    In: Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
    RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:24:y:2007:i:3:p:341-358.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. An econometric analysis of asymmetric volatility: Theory and application to patents. (2007). Chan, Felix ; Marinova, Dora.
    In: Journal of Econometrics.
    RePEc:eee:econom:v:139:y:2007:i:2:p:259-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. SEARCHING FOR SECTORAL PATTERNS OF INNOVATION IN EUROPEAN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY. (2007). Pinho, Carlos ; Varum, Celeste.
    In: Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers).
    RePEc:ave:wpaper:482007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Patents and Secrecy on Knowledge Spillovers. (2006). Schmidt, Tobias.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:5441.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. IS SILENCE GOLDEN? PATENTS VERSUS SECRECY AT THE FIRM LEVEL. (2006). Hussinger, Katrin.
    In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
    RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:735-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Managing Knowledge Flows through Appropriation and Learning Strategies. (2006). Webster, Elizabeth ; Jensen, Paul.
    In: Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:iae:iaewps:wp2006n06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Endogenous protection of R and D investments. (2006). Milliou, Chrysovalantou.
    In: UC3M Working papers. Economics.
    RePEc:cte:werepe:we066325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. The market value of patents and R&D: Evidence from European firms. (2006). Torrisi, Salvatore ; Thoma, Grid ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. The Trade-Off Of Intellectual Property Rights Reconsidered: Technological Knowledge As An Essential Facility.. (2005). antonelli, cristiano ; Cristiano, Antonelli.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series.
    RePEc:uto:labeco:200509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Technological Knowledge As An Essential Facility.. (2005). antonelli, cristiano ; Cristiano, Antonelli.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series.
    RePEc:uto:labeco:200504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Is Silence Golden? Patents versus Secrecy at the Firm Level. (2005). Hussinger, Katrin.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems.
    RePEc:trf:wpaper:37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Innovation, strategic renewal and its effect on small firm performance. (2005). van Stel, André ; Meijaard, Joris ; Folkeringa, Mickey .
    In: Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy.
    RePEc:esi:egpdis:2005-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look. (2005). Pénin, Julien ; Penin, Julien.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:5:p:641-656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Towards a dynamic (Schumpeterian) welfare economics. (2005). Dolfsma, Wilfred.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:1:p:69-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. The decision to patent, cumulative innovation, and optimal policy. (2005). Erkal, Nisvan.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:23:y:2005:i:7-8:p:535-562.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Why IT Matters: An Empirical Study of E-Business Usage, Innovation, and Firm Performance. (2005). Koellinger, Philipp.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. My Precious. The Role of Appropriability Strategies in Shaping Innovative Performance. (2005). Laursen, Keld ; Salter, Ammon.
    In: DRUID Working Papers.
    RePEc:aal:abbswp:05-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Is Silence Golden? Patents versus Secrecy at the Firm Level. (2004). Hussinger, Katrin.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:2883.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Spatial Inventor Networks As Studied by Patent Coinventorship. (2004). Karlsson, Charlie ; Ejermo, Olof.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation.
    RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. (2004). Oliver, Amalya L..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:33:y:2004:i:4:p:583-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications. (2004). Thumm, Nikolaus ; Blind, Knut.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:33:y:2004:i:10:p:1583-1598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. The Protection of Innovations. (2004). Atallah, Gamal.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2004s-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Patents versus ex-post rewards: a new look.. (2003). Pénin, Julien ; Penin, Julien.
    In: Working Papers of BETA.
    RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2003-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

51. The contract theory of patents. (2003). Franzoni, Luigi Alberto ; Denicolo', Vincenzo.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:365-380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

52. Patents versus ex-post rewards : a new look. (2003). Pénin, Julien ; Penin, Julien.
    In: Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM.
    RePEc:cre:uqamwp:20-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

53. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Report date: 2025-09-24 20:12:11 || Missing content? Let us know