create a website

How do stakeholder groups make sense of sustainability: Analysing differences in the complexity of their cognitive frames. (2024). Preuss, Lutz ; Fischer, Isabel ; Arora, Bimal.
In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:2367-2383.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 127

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2021). Cognitive biases and decision‐making strategies in times of change: A systematic literature review. Management Decision, 59(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-1006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Adenzato, M., Brambilla, M., Manenti, R., De Lucia, L., Trojano, L., Garofalo, S., Enrici, I., & Cotelli, M. (2017). Gender differences in cognitive theory of mind revealed by transcranial direct current stimulation on medial prefrontal cortex. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 41219. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691575.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., Matute, E., & Inozemtseva, O. (2011). Gender differences in cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 984–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023819.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Arenas, D., Albareda, L., & Goodman, J. (2020). Contestation in multi‐stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0109-x.

  7. Bager, S. L., & Lambin, E. F. (2020). Sustainability strategies by companies in the global coffee sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3555–3570. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2596.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Banerjee, S. B. (2018). Transnational power and translocal governance: The politics of corporate responsibility. Human Relations, 71(6), 796–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717726586.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bansal, P., Grewatsch, S., & Sharma, G. (2021). How COVID‐19 informs business sustainability research: It's time for a systems perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12669.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Baranova, P. (2022). Environmental capability development in a multi‐stakeholder network setting: Dynamic learning through multi‐stakeholder interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3406–3420. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3091.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Barnett, M. L. (2019). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society, 58(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660044.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27745504.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166735.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Bitzer, V., & Schouten, G. (2023). Out of balance: Global–local tensions in multi‐stakeholder partnerships and the emergence of rival initiatives in producing countries. Organization & Environment, 36(3), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221117231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Block, C., Rennings, M., & Bröring, S. (2023). Selecting technologies to engage in sustainability transitions—A multi‐stakeholder perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3569–3595. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Boersma, M. (2018). Between norms and practice: Civil society perspectives on the legitimacy of multistakeholder initiatives to eliminate child labor. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(5), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2066.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Brand, T., Blok, V., & Verweij, M. (2020). Stakeholder dialogue as agonistic deliberation: Exploring the role of conflict and self‐interest in business‐NGO interaction. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.21.

  19. Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2089.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Brunton, M., Eweje, G., & Taskin, N. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility to internal stakeholders: Walking the walk or just talking the talk? Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1889.

  21. Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100401.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Byrne, S., & Hart, P. S. (2009). The boomerang effect a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 33(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2009.11679083.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Carroll, A. B. (1987). In search of the moral manager. Business Horizons, 30(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(87)90002-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Chatterjee, A., Ghosh, A., & Leca, B. (2023). Double weaving: A bottom‐up process of connecting locations and scales to mitigate grand challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 66(3), 797–828. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Christensen, R. K., Paarlberg, L., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12796.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181–235. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.875669.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Crilly, D., Schneider, S. C., & Zollo, M. (2008). Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. European Management Review, 5(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2008.15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Davis, J. M., & Swiss, L. (2020). Need, merit, self‐interest or convenience? Exploring aid allocation motives of grassroots international NGOs. Journal of International Development, 32(8), 1324–1345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. de Bakker, F. G., Rasche, A., & Ponte, S. (2019). Multi‐stakeholder initiatives on sustainability: A cross‐disciplinary review and research agenda for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(3), 343–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. de Lange, D. E., Armanios, D., Delgado‐Ceballos, J., & Sandhu, S. (2016). From foe to friend: Complex mutual adaptation of multinational corporations and nongovernmental organizations. Business & Society, 55(8), 1197–1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650314568537.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Dentchev, N. A., Haezendonck, E., & van Balen, M. (2017). The role of governments in the business and society debate. Business & Society, 56(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315586179.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V., & Schouten, G. (2018). Harnessing wicked problems in multi‐stakeholder partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 335–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x.

  36. Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/258903.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O'Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<407::AID-SMJ881>3.0.CO;2-J.

  38. Easter, S., Murphy, M., & Brannen, M. Y. (2023). Negotiating meaning systems in multi‐stakeholder partnerships addressing grand challenges: Homelessness in Western Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05064-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Eckardt, R., Crocker, A., Ahn, Y., Floyd, S. W., Boyd, B. K., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Moliterno, T. P., & Starbuck, W. H. (2019). Reflections on the micro–macro divide: Ideas from the trenches and moving forward. Strategic Organization, 17(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018770048.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Eikelenboom, M., & Long, T. B. (2023). Breaking the cycle of marginalization: How to involve local communities in multi‐stakeholder initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 186(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05252-5.

  41. Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Petti, C. (2020). Building responses to sustainable development challenges: A multistakeholder collaboration framework and application to climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2465–2478. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2514.

  42. Esposito, P., Doronzo, E., & Dicorato, S. L. (2023). The financial and green effects of cultural values on mission drifts in European social enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Farrell, C., Hatcher, W., & Diamond, J. (2022). Reflecting on over 100 years of public administration education. Public Administration, 100(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12808.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Fassin, Y. (2009). Inconsistencies in activists' behaviours and the ethics of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0056-6.

  45. Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614563742.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Fougère, M., & Solitander, N. (2020). Dissent in consensusland: An agonistic problematization of multi‐stakeholder governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(4), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04398-z.

  47. Fransen, L. (2012). Multi‐stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: Legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio‐Economic Review, 10(1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr029.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Gagliardi, N., Grinza, E., & Rycx, F. (2023). Workers' tenure and firm productivity: New evidence from matched employer‐employee panel data. Industrial Relations: a Journal of Economy and Society, 62(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12309.

  49. George, G., Fewer, T. J., Lazzarini, S., McGahan, A. M., & Puranam, P. (2023). Partnering for grand challenges: A review of organizational design considerations in public–private collaborations. Journal of Management, 014920632211489. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221148992.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. George, G., Howard‐Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604.

  52. Glynn, M. A., & Watkiss, L. (2020). Of organizing and sensemaking: From action to meaning and back again in a half‐century of Weick's theorizing. Journal of Management Studies, 57(7), 1331–1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12613.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Gond, J. P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person‐centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2170.

  54. Graf‐Vlachy, L., Bundy, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2020). Effects of an advancing tenure on CEO cognitive complexity. Organization Science, 31(4), 936–959. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1336.

  55. Gray, B., & Purdy, J. (2018). Collaborating for our future: Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Green, D., & McManus, I. (1995). Cognitive structural models: The perception of risk and prevention in coronary heart disease. British Journal of Psychology, 86(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02755.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Grewatsch, S., Kennedy, S., & Bansal, P. (2023). Tackling wicked problems in strategic management with systems thinking. Strategic Organization, 21(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211038635.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Grimes, M. G., & Vogus, T. J. (2021). Inconceivable! Possibilistic thinking and the sociocognitive underpinnings of entrepreneurial responses to grand challenges. Organization Theory, 2(2), 26317877211005780. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005780.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Grimm, J. (2022). Cognitive frames of poverty and tension handling in base‐of‐the‐pyramid business models. Business & Society, 61(8), 2070–2114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320975184.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Gröschl, S., Gabaldón, P., & Hahn, T. (2019). The co‐evolution of leaders' cognitive complexity and corporate sustainability: The case of the CEO of puma. Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3508-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Hahn, T., & Albert, N. (2017). Strong reciprocity in consumer boycotts. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2870-3.

  62. Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.

  63. Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Halme, M., Rintamäki, J., Knudsen, J. S., Lankoski, L., & Kuisma, M. (2020). When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Business & Society, 59(6), 1181–1227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318755648.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Harris, P., Easterbrook, M. J., & Horst, J. S. (2021). Designing and reporting experiments in psychology. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Hayes‐Roth, B. (1977). Evolution of cognitive structures and processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.260.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Heinz, N., & Koessler, A.‐K. (2021). Other‐regarding preferences and pro‐environmental behaviour: An interdisciplinary review of experimental studies. Ecological Economics, 184, 106987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106987.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Helsing, D. (2007). Regarding uncertainty in teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1317–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Helyer, R. (2015). Learning through reflection: The critical role of reflection in work‐based learning (WBL). Journal of Work‐Applied Management, 7(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Hine, D. W., Phillips, W. J., Cooksey, R., Reser, J. P., Nunn, P., Marks, A. D., Loi, N. M., & Watt, S. E. (2016). Preaching to different choirs: How to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? Global Environmental Change, 36, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  71. Hockerts, K. (2015). A cognitive perspective on the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(2), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1813.

  72. Hodgkinson, G. P., Burkhard, B., Foss, N. J., Grichnik, D., Sarala, R. M., Tang, Y., & Van Essen, M. (2023). The heuristics and biases of top managers: Past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 60(5), 1033–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12937.

  73. Høvring, C. M., Andersen, S. E., & Nielsen, A. E. (2018). Discursive tensions in CSR multi‐stakeholder dialogue: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3330-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Huber, K., & Schormair, M. J. (2021). Progressive and conservative firms in multistakeholder initiatives: Tracing the construction of political CSR identities within the accord on fire and building safety in Bangladesh. Business & Society, 60(2), 454–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319825786.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Isaacs, M. (2016). Multi‐stakeholder process of co‐designing small‐scale fisheries policy in South Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0874-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Kaplan, S. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0340.

  77. Kim, T. K. (2017). Understanding one‐way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.1.22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  78. Klitsie, E. J., Ansari, S., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). Maintenance of cross‐sector partnerships: The role of frames in sustained collaboration. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3859-5.

  79. Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614525555.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Kroeger, A., Siebold, N., Günzel‐Jensen, F., Saade, F. P., & Heikkilä, J.‐P. (2022). Tackling grand challenges collaboratively: The role of value‐driven sensegiving. In A. A. Gümüsay, E. Marti, H. Trittin‐Ulbrich, & C. Wickert (Eds.), Organizing for societal grand challenges. Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 79) (pp. 17–42). Emerald Publishing Limited.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Lambell, R., Ramia, G., Nyland, C., & Michelotti, M. (2008). NGOs and international business research: Progress, prospects and problems. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00218.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Loughran, T., McDonald, B., & Otteson, J. R. (2023). How have corporate codes of ethics responded to an era of increased scrutiny? Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05104-2.

  86. Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker‐Drob, E. M. (2020). Education and cognitive functioning across the life span. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620920576.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Lucea, R. (2010). How we see them versus how they see themselves: A cognitive perspective of firm—NGO relationships. Business & Society, 49(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309345459.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Macfarlane, B. (2011). Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903443734.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Malhotra, S., & Harrison, J. S. (2022). A blessing and a curse: How chief executive officer cognitive complexity influences firm performance under varying industry conditions. Strategic Management Journal, 43(13), 2809–2828. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3415.

  91. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Markoczy, L., & Goldberg, J. (1995). A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps. Journal of Management, 21(2), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90060-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Mazutis, D., & Eckardt, A. (2017). Sleepwalking into catastrophe: Cognitive biases and corporate climate change inertia. California Management Review, 59(3), 74–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617707974.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  94. McDonald, P. (2018). Sustainability management: Research insights from social cognitive neuroscience. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2184.

  95. Miller, C., Chiu, S., Wesley, C., Vera, D., & Avery, D. (2022). Cognitive diversity at the strategic apex: Assessing evidence on the value of different perspectives and ideas among senior leaders. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 806–852. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0387.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Miron‐Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Mom, T. J., Fourné, S. P., & Jansen, J. J. (2015). Managers' work experience, ambidexterity, and performance: The contingency role of the work context. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s133–s153. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21663.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Norton, T. (2007). The structuration of public participation: Organizing environmental control. Environmental Communication, 1(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030701642546.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development. Retrieved September 22, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  101. Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service‐dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co‐production and value co‐creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461.

  102. Osborne, S. P. (2021). Public service logic: Creating value for public service users, citizens, and society through public service delivery. Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Panwar, R., Ober, H., & Pinkse, J. (2023). The uncomfortable relationship between business and biodiversity: Advancing research on business strategies for biodiversity protection. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(5), 2554–2566. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3139.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(May/June), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  105. Prömpeler, J., Veltrop, D. B., Stoker, J. I., & Rink, F. A. (2023). Striving for sustainable development at the top: Exploring the interplay of director and CEO values on environmental sustainability focus. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3408.

  106. Quade, M. J., Bonner, J. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2022). Management without morals: Construct development and initial testing of amoral management. Human Relations, 75(2), 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720972784.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  107. Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2016). Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12137.

  108. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Rupp, D. E., & Mallory, D. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person‐centric, and progressing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  110. Salamon, L. M. (2010). Putting the civil society sector on the economic map of the world. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(2), 167–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00409.x.

  111. Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8.

  112. Sebhatu, S. P., & Enquist, B. (2022). Values and multi‐stakeholder dialog for business transformation in light of the UN sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05195-x.

  113. Sharma, G., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2018). Unsustainability of sustainability: Cognitive frames and tensions in bottom of the pyramid projects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 291–307.

  114. Shea, C. T., & Hawn, O. V. (2019). Microfoundations of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1609–1642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0795.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Siqi‐Liu, A., & Egner, T. (2020). Contextual adaptation of cognitive flexibility is driven by task‐and item‐level learning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(4), 757–782. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  116. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134.

  117. Snihur, Y., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2022). Looking forward, looking back: Strategic organization and the business model concept. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221122442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Somers, M. J., Passerini, K., Parhankangas, A., & Casal, J. (2014). Using mind maps to study how business school students and faculty organize and apply general business knowledge. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2013.11.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  119. Stangroom, J. (2019) Effect Size Calculator. Retrieved April 3, 2023, from https://www.socscistatistics.com/effectsize/default3.aspx.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  120. Stazyk, E. C., & Davis, R. S. (2015). Taking the ‘high road’: Does public service motivation alter ethical decision making processes? Public Administration, 93(3), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  121. Stott, L. (2023). Partnership and transformation: The promise of multi‐stakeholder collaboration in context. Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  122. Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277702100108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  123. Wade, B., & Griffiths, A. (2022). Exploring the cognitive foundations of managerial (climate) change decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(1), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04855-8.

  124. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.280.

  125. West, B., Hillenbrand, C., Money, K., Ghobadian, A., & Ireland, R. D. (2016). Exploring the impact of social axioms on firm reputation: A stakeholder perspective. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12153.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  126. Whelan, G., de Bakker, F. G., den Hond, F., & Muthuri, J. N. (2019). Talking the walk: The deflation response to legitimacy challenges. M@N@Gement, 22(4), 636–663.

  127. Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01073.x.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Webs of Influence: Secondary Stakeholder Actions and Cross-National Corporate Social Performance. (2021). Henisz, Witold ; Odziemkowska, Kate.
    In: Organization Science.
    RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:1:p:233-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A New Approach to Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2021). Nova, Rodrigo J ; Perez-Barea, Jose Javier ; Garcia-Jurado, Alejandro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2754-:d:510075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Sustainability-Conscious Stakeholders and CSR: Evidence from IJVs of Ghana. (2021). Wang, Xiaoling ; Sun, Huaping ; Chen, Haojia ; Tian, Gang ; Pekyi, Gabriel Dodzi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:639-:d:478543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. (2020). Torelli, Riccardo ; Furlotti, Katia ; Balluchi, Federica.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:470-484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Insights on Social Responsibility of NGOS. (2020). Colesca, Sofia Elena ; Pceil, Mihaela.
    In: Systemic Practice and Action Research.
    RePEc:spr:syspar:v:33:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-020-09520-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Misaligned Needs in the Pursuit of Shared Value: A Multi-Stakeholder Study of the Shift from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Economy. (2020). Hidden, Karen ; Marks, Jonathan Tresman.
    In: Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies.
    RePEc:sae:jouent:v:6:y:2020:i:2:p:363-382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Developing State Capacity: The Missing Variable for Corporate Social Responsibility?. (2020). Hira, Anil.
    In: Journal of Developing Societies.
    RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:36:y:2020:i:3:p:290-311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Effects of Organizational Traits on NGO–Business Engagement in Mexico. (2020). Pesqueira, Luli ; Aigner, Dennis J.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10108-:d:455723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: Manufacturers perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management. (2020). Roy, Vivek ; Singh, Shubham ; Silvestre, Bruno S.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:227:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320300669.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. MNE-NGO partnerships for sustainability and social responsibility in the global fast-fashion industry: A loose-coupling perspective. (2020). Cavusgil, Tamer S ; Napier, Elizabeth ; Runfola, Andrea.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:29:y:2020:i:5:s0969593120300810.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. NGOs perspective over CSR actions in an emerging economy. (2019). Andrei, Stoica Drago ; Radu, Petrariu Ioan ; Raluca-Georgiana, Chivu.
    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence.
    RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:933-944:n:82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The communication of Corporate–NGO Partnerships: analysis of Sainsbury’s collaboration with Comic Relief. (2019). Topi, Martina ; Rohwer, Lynn.
    In: Journal of Brand Management.
    RePEc:pal:jobman:v:26:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1057_s41262-018-0111-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Reasons of Unethical Business Practices in Slovakia: The Perspective of Non-Governmental Organizations Representatives. (2019). Lasakova, Anna ; Remiova, Anna ; Laakova, Anna ; Bohinska, Alexandra.
    In: Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis.
    RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2019067020565.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Corporate–NGO Partnerships through Sustainability Labeling Schemes: Motives and Risks. (2019). Poret, Sylvaine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02154666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Corporate–NGO Partnerships through Sustainability Labeling Schemes: Motives and Risks. (2019). Poret, Sylvaine.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2689-:d:230236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility implementation: a study of Indian executives. (2019). Aggrawal, Vijita Singh ; Jha, Aruna.
    In: Social Responsibility Journal.
    RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-11-2018-0311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Role of Normative CSR‐Promoting Institutions in Stimulating CSR Disclosures in Developing Countries. (2018). Ali, Waris ; Frynas, Jedrzej George.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:373-390.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Frontstage and Backstage of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill. (2018). Roberts, Robin W ; Rodrigue, Michelle ; Laine, Matias ; Cho, Charles H.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:152:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3375-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Bankers Bashing Back: Amoral CSR Justifications. (2018). Norberg, Peter.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:147:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2965-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Corporate social responsibility in international joint ventures: Empirical examinations in South Korea. (2018). Il, Byung ; Cave, Adam H.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:27:y:2018:i:6:p:1213-1228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Social movement NGOs and the comprehensiveness of conflict mineral disclosures: evidence from global companies. (2018). Islam, Muhammad ; van Staden, Chris J.
    In: Accounting, Organizations and Society.
    RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:65:y:2018:i:c:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. On NGOs Role in the Development of Business Ethics in Slovakia. (2018). Lasakova, Anna ; Remiov, Anna ; Lakov, Anna.
    In: Athens Journal of Business & Economics.
    RePEc:ate:journl:ajbev4i4-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Social sustainability in the ready-made-garment sector in Bangladesh: an institutional approach to supply chains. (2018). Bitsch, Vera ; Carlson, Laura A.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:269552.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Freiwillige Selbstverpflichtung von Unternehmen in Antikorruptionsinitiativen: Der Einfluss des nationalen Kontextes auf internationales Engagement am Beispiel chinesischer und indischer Unternehmen. (2017). Bargstadt, Dorothee .
    In: PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy.
    RePEc:zbw:fubipe:282017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Uncovering strategies of hidden intention in multi-stakeholder initiatives: The case of pasture-raised milk. (2017). Spiller, Achim ; Kuhl, Sarah ; Gauly, Sarah.
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:1704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The role of NGOs in corporate environmental responsibility practice: evidence from Ethiopia. (2017). Botes, Vida ; Asfaw, Tibebe Sirak ; Mengesha, Lula G.
    In: International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:2:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-017-0013-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Factors Influencing Microfinance Engagements by Formal Financial Institutions. (2017). Chiu, Tzu-Kuan .
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:143:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2811-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector. (2017). Viveros, Hector.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:1-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Uncovering strategies of hidden intention in multi-stakeholder initiatives: the case of pasture-raised milk. (2017). Spiller, Achim ; Gauly, Sarah ; Muller, Andreas.
    In: Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:gadadp:260768.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Corporate philanthropy and community involvement. Analysing companies from France, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain. (2016). Chirivella-Gonzalez, Vicente ; De-Miguel, Blanca ; Garcia-Ortega, Beatriz.
    In: Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology.
    RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-015-0287-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products. (2016). Romani, Simona ; Grappi, Silvia ; Bagozzi, Richard P.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:135:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-014-2485-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Priorities and Perceptions for Corporate Social Responsibility: An NGO Perspective. (2015). Skouloudis, Antonis ; MALESIOS, CHRYSOVALANTIS ; Evangelinos, Konstantinos.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:22:y:2015:i:2:p:95-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. (2015). Wang, Yi-Hsin ; Chiu, Tzu-Kuan .
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:129:y:2015:i:2:p:379-398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Stakeholders’ Influence on French Unions’ CSR Strategies. (2015). Havard, Christelle ; Sobczak, Andre.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:129:y:2015:i:2:p:311-324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Greening the Field? How NGOs Are Shaping Corporate Social Responsibility in China. (2015). Davis, Susannah M. ; Moosmayer, Dirk C..
    In: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell.
    RePEc:gig:chaktu:v:43:y:2014:i:4:p:75-110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Determinants influencing CSR practices in small and medium sized MNE subsidiaries: A stakeholder perspective. (2015). Ghauri, Pervez N. ; Park, Byung Il .
    In: Journal of World Business.
    RePEc:eee:worbus:v:50:y:2015:i:1:p:192-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. In Lieu of a Sovereignty Shield, Multinational Corporations Should Be Responsible for the Harm They Cause. (2014). Byrne, Edmund .
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:124:y:2014:i:4:p:609-621.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Corporate-NGO partnerships in CSR activities: why and how?. (2014). Poret, Sylvaine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01070474.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Corporate-NGO partnerships in CSR activities: why and how?. (2014). Poret, Sylvaine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ali:wpaper:2014-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Different Paths to Collaboration Between Businesses and Civil Society and the Role of Third Parties. (2013). Sanchez, Pablo ; Murphy, Matthew ; Arenas, Daniel.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:115:y:2013:i:4:p:723-739.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Social and environmental NGOs’ perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosures: The Case of Bangladesh. (2013). Momin, Mahmood Ahmed.
    In: Accounting forum.
    RePEc:eee:accfor:v:37:y:2013:i:2:p:150-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Institutional investor influence on global climate change disclosure practices. (2012). .
    In: Australian Journal of Management.
    RePEc:sae:ausman:v:37:y:2012:i:2:p:169-187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications. (2012). Bondy, Krista ; Moon, Jeremy ; Matten, Dirk.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:111:y:2012:i:2:p:281-299.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Dominant Articulations in Academic Business and Society Discourse on NGO–Business Relations: A Critical Assessment. (2012). Laasonen, Salla ; Fougere, Martin ; Kourula, Arno.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:109:y:2012:i:4:p:521-545.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Co-optation. (2012). Schmitz, Hans ; Baur, Dorothea.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:106:y:2012:i:1:p:9-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Stakeholders Influence on French Unions CSR Strategies. (2012). Sobczak, Andre ; Havard, Christelle.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00978743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. A Perspective on Ghanas Mining Sector. (2012). Sarpong, Sam ; Sam, Sarpong .
    In: New Global Studies.
    RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:22:n:6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Stakeholder marketing: a definition and conceptual framework. (2011). Ferrell, O C ; Mena, Jeannette A ; Tomas, G.
    In: AMS Review.
    RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:1:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-011-0002-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Sourcing in an Increasingly Expensive China: Four Swedish Cases. (2010). Fang, Tony ; Larsson, Emma ; Gunterberg, Caroline .
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:97:y:2010:i:1:p:119-138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Responsible Leaders for Inclusive Globalization: Cases in Nicaragua and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. (2010). Maria, Josep ; Lozano, Josep .
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:93:y:2010:i:1:p:93-111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 03:45:33 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.