create a website

The pathway towards circular economy: Measuring circular advantage of eco‐innovations. (2024). Menichini, Tamara ; Brogi, Stefano.
In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:3005-3038.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 110

References cited by this document

Cocites: 60

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Mechanism of green and knowledge process toward minimizing innovation risks: A direct and configuration approach. (2024). Khan, Naveed ; Zhang, Jianhua ; Alam, Sajjad ; Dandan, Wen.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:7750-7767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Acerbi, F., & Taisch, M. (2020). A literature review on circular economy adoption in the manufacturing sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123086.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alamerew, Y. A., Kambanou, M. L., Sakao, T., & Brissaud, D. (2020). A multi‐criteria evaluation method of product‐level circularity strategies. Sustainability, 12(12), 5129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125129.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Almeida, F., & Wasim, J. (2022). Eco‐innovation and sustainable business performance: Perspectives of SMEs in Portugal and the UK. Society and Business Review, 18, 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-12-2021-0233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, M. T. (2006). Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge‐Based Systems, 14(04), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Ashtiani, B., Haghighirad, F., Makui, A., & ali Montazer, G. (2009). Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval‐valued fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.05.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1205/095758200530763.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Blinova, E., Ponomarenko, T., & Knysh, V. (2022). Analyzing the concept of corporate sustainability in the context of sustainable business development in the mining sector with elements of circular economy. Sustainability, 14(13), 8163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138163.

  8. Bocken, N. M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018). Exploring how usage‐focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability, 10(3), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030639.

  10. Brogi, S., & Menichini, T. (2019). Do the ISO 14001 environmental management systems influence eco‐innovation performance? Evidences from the EU context. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(4), 292–292. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n4p292.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Cai, W. G., & Zhou, X. L. (2014). On the drivers of eco‐innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Ghiron, N. L., Menichini, T., Miscoli, V., & Tiburzi, L. (2021). Operating modes and cost burdens for the European deposit‐refund systems: A systematic approach for their analysis and design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125600.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2019). Integrating sustainability into strategic decision‐making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Castelló‐Sirvent, F., Meneses‐Eraso, C., Alonso‐Gómez, J., & Peris‐Ortiz, M. (2022). Three decades of fuzzy AHP: A bibliometric analysis. Axioms, 11(10), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11100525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., & Urbinati, A. (2020). Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1734–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.

  18. Chowdhury, P., & Paul, S. K. (2020). Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review. Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal, 31(2), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0284.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Colombo, L. A., Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2019). The discourse of eco‐innovation in the European Union: An analysis of the eco‐innovation action plan and horizon 2020. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. De Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco‐innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. De Jesus, A., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Eco‐innovation in the transition to a circular economy: An analytical literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2999–3018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. De Jesus, A., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Mendonça, S. (2019). Eco‐innovation pathways to a circular economy: Envisioning priorities through a Delphi approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1494–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.049.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. De Jesus, A., Lammi, M., Domenech, T., Vanhuyse, F., & Mendonça, S. (2021). Eco‐innovation diversity in a circular economy: Towards circular innovation studies. Sustainability, 13(19), 10974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910974.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. De Oliveira, C. T., Dantas, T. E. T., & Soares, S. R. (2021). Nano and micro level circular economy indicators: Assisting decision‐makers in circularity assessments. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.024.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Del Río González, P. (2005). Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: A study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.426.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Diaz‐Balteiro, L., González‐Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2017). Measuring systems sustainability with multi‐criteria methods: A critical review. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Dos Santos Gonçalves, P. V., & Campos, L. (2022). A systemic review for measuring circular economy with multi‐criteria methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1‐15, 31597–31611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18580-w.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Durán‐Romero, G., López, A. M., Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Garonne, C., & Jones, P. (2020). Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco‐innovations and quintuple helix model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change B, 160, 120246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120246.

  29. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323.

  30. EC. (2019). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European green Deal. Communication no. COM/2019/640. European Commission.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. EC. (2020). A new circular economy action plan. For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Communication from the commission to the parliament, council and committees, march 11, 2020. COM(2020)98. The European Commission.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. EIO, 2016. Policies and practices for eco‐innovation uptake and circular economy transition. Eco‐innovation observatory. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission & Eco‐Innovation Observatory.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Eisenreich, A., Füller, J., & Stuchtey, M. (2021). Circular project selection: How companies can evaluate circular innovation projects. Sustainability, 13(22), 12407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212407oo.

  34. Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2741–2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/x8ay372a3r11-k6775n/@/preview/1?o.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015.

  38. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Heidary Dahooie, J., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Abolhasani, M., Vanaki, A., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A novel approach for evaluation of projects using an interval–valued fuzzy additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method: A case study of oil and gas well drilling projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10020045.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Jaukovic Jocic, K., Jocic, G., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G., Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., & Thanh Nguyen, P. (2020). A novel integrated piprecia–interval‐valued triangular fuzzy ARAS model: E‐learning course selection. Symmetry, 12(6), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060928.

  41. Kazancoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, I., & Sagnak, M. (2018). A new holistic conceptual framework for green supply chain management performance assessment based on circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1282–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco‐innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, 10(2).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kesidou, E., & Demirel, P. (2012). On the drivers of eco‐innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK. Research Policy, 41(5), 862–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring: Key capabilities and organizational routines for circular economy implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125565.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Khan, P. A., & Johl, S. K. (2019). Nexus of comprehensive green innovation, environmental management system‐14001‐2015 and firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1691833. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833.

  46. Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01067.x.

  47. Kiefer, C. P., Del Rio Gonzalez, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2019). Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Kiefer, C. P., del Río, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2021). On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1531–1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2688.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.

  50. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2019). Online platforms and the circular economy. Innovation for sustainability: Business transformations towards a better world, 435–450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From planning to implementation: Top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12067.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Kuo, M. S. (2011). A novel interval‐valued fuzzy MCDM method for improving airlines' service quality in Chinese cross‐strait airlines. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Kuo, M. S., & Liang, G. S. (2012). A soft computing method of performance evaluation with MCDM based on interval‐valued fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Kuo, T. C., & Smith, S. (2018). A systematic review of technologies involving eco‐innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Kwatra, S., Kumar, A., Sharma, S., & Sharma, P. (2021). Stakeholder participation in prioritizing sustainability issues at regional level using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique: A case study of Goa, India. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 11, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2015). Waste to wealth. The circular economy advantage. Palgrave MacMillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Lacy, P., Keeble, J., McNamara, R. J. T. M. A. C. K. P. A. T., Rutqvist, J., Haglund, T., Cui, M., & Buddemeier, P. (2014). Circular advantage: Innovative business models and technologies to create value in a world without limits to growth. Accenture.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Lacy, P., Long, J., & Spindler, W. (2020). The circular economy handbook. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Lee, C. S., Chung, C. C., Lee, H. S., Gan, G. Y., & Chou, M. T. (2016). An interval‐valued fuzzy number approach for supplier selection. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 24(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST-015-0521-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Liao, C. N., Fu, Y. K., & Wu, L. C. (2016). Integrated FAHP, ARAS‐F and MSGP methods for green supplier evaluation and selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1072750.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Linder, M., & Williander, M. (2017). Circular business model innovation: Inherent uncertainties. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1906.

  64. Liu, Y., & Ren, J. (2021). Overview of sustainability, sustainable development and sustainability assessment: Concepts and methods. In Energy systems evaluation (volume 1) (pp. 1–29). Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763.

  66. Ly, B. (2021). Competitive advantage and internationalization of a circular economy model in apparel multinationals. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1944012. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1944012.

  67. Machiba, T. (2011). Eco‐innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. In International economics of resource efficiency (pp. 371–394). Physica‐Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2601-2_19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Málovics, G., Csigéné, N. N., & Kraus, S. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability. The Journal of Socio‐Economics, 37(3), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.061.

  69. Marshall, R. S., & Brown, D. (2003). The strategy of sustainability: A systems perspective on environmental initiatives. California Management Review, 46(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166234.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Meuer, J., Koelbel, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2020). On the nature of corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 33(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/108602661985.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Mohammadian, A., Heidary Dahooie, J., Qorbani, A. R., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2021). A new multi‐attribute decision‐making framework for policy‐makers by using interval‐valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Informatica, 32(3), 583–618. https://doi.org/10.15388/21-INFOR448.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Nascimento, D. L. M., Alencastro, V., Quelhas, O. L. G., Caiado, R. G. G., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., Rocha‐Lona, L., & Tortorella, G. (2019). Exploring industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Nguyen, H. T., Md Dawal, S. Z., Nukman, Y. P., Rifai, A., & Aoyama, H. (2016). An integrated MCDM model for conveyor equipment evaluation and selection in an FMC based on a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ARAS in the presence of vagueness. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Oghazi, P., & Mostaghel, R. (2018). Circular business model challenges and lessons learned—An industrial perspective. Sustainability, 10(3), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030739.

  75. Ooi, S. K., Ooi, C. A., & Memon, K. R. (2020). The role of CSR oriented organisational culture in eco‐innovation practices. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(5), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2020.10032785.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Pereira, R. M., MacLennan, M. L. F., & Tiago, E. F. (2020). Interorganizational cooperation and eco‐innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science., 12, 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-01-2020-0008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Pieroni, M. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Ranta, V., Aarikka‐Stenroos, L., & Väisänen, J. M. (2021). Digital technologies catalyzing business model innovation for circular economy—Multiple case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105155.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Rattalino, F. (2018). Circular advantage anyone? Sustainability‐driven innovation and circularity at Patagonia, Inc. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(5), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21917.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G. Ö. (2017). Barriers to the circular economy–integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia Cirp, 64, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Roos Lindgreen, E., Salomone, R., & Reyes, T. (2020). A critical review of academic approaches, methods and tools to assess circular economy at the micro level. Sustainability, 12(12), 4973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124973.

  82. Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Terzi, S. (2020). Assessing relations between circular economy and industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1662–1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896.

  83. Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision‐making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8.

  84. Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019). A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Sanyé‐Mengual, E., Secchi, M., Corrado, S., Beylot, A., & Sala, S. (2019). Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: A consumption‐based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Sassanelli, C., Rosa, P., Rocca, R., & Terzi, S. (2019). Circular economy performance assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Scarpellini, S., Valero‐Gil, J., Moneva, J. M., & Andreaus, M. (2020). Environmental management capabilities for a “circular eco‐innovation”. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 1850–1864. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2472.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Sehnem, S., de Queiroz, A. A. F. S., Pereira, S. C. F., dos Santos Correia, G., & Kuzma, E. (2022). Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2884.

  89. Shih, D. H., Lu, C. M., Lee, C. H., Cai, S. Y., Wu, K. J., & Tseng, M. L. (2018). Eco‐innovation in circular Agri‐business. Sustainability, 10(4), 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Siew, R. Y. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Stanujkic, D. (2015). Extension of the ARAS method for decision‐making problems with interval‐valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Informatica, 26(2), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Stewart, R., & Niero, M. (2018). Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast‐moving consumer goods sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2048.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Toha, M., Johl, S. K., & Khan, P. A. (2020). Firm's sustainability and societal development from the lens of fishbone eco‐innovation: A moderating role of ISO 14001‐2015 environmental management system. Pro, 8(9), 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Tošović‐Stevanović, A., Ristanović, V., Ćalović, D., Lalić, G., Žuža, M., & Cvijanović, G. (2020). Small farm business analysis using the AHP model for efficient assessment of distribution channels. Sustainability, 12(24), 10479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410479.

  95. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi‐criteria decision making methods. In Multi‐criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5–21). Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Tseng, M. L., Wang, R., Chiu, A. S., Geng, Y., & Lin, Y. H. (2013). Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Turner, R., Zolin, R., & Remington, K. (2009). Monitoring the performance of complex projects from multiple perspectives over multiple time frames. In International Research Network of Project Management Conference (IRNOP) (pp. 1‐27).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport, 25(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Ukko, J., Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2019). Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117626.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Ulibarri, N., Scott, T. A., & Perez‐Figueroa, O. (2019). How does stakeholder involvement affect environmental impact assessment? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79, 106309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106309.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli‐Moghaddam, R., Mousavi, S. M., & Ghodratnama, A. (2013). Soft computing based on new interval‐valued fuzzy modified multi‐criteria decision‐making method. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Valdez‐Juárez, L. E., & Castillo‐Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco‐innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Vence, X., & Pereira, Á. (2019). Eco‐innovation and circular business models as drivers for a circular economy. Contaduría Y administración, 64(SPE1), 64. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.1806.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Walton, S., Zhang, A., & O'Kane, C. (2020). Energy eco‐innovations for sustainable development: Exploring organizational strategic capabilities through an energy cultures framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2399.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. (2007). A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.04.009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050.

  107. WBCSD. (2020). Circular Economy Action Plan 2020‐ Summary for businesses: Implications and next steps World Business Council for Sustainable Development. https://www.wbcsd.org/Archive/Factor-10/Policy-Engagement/Resources/Circular-Economy-Action-Plan-CEAP-2020-Summary-for-business.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1603-0.

  109. Yager, R. R. (1981). A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Information Sciences, 24(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(81)90017-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Configuration Paths for High-Quality Development of Listed Companies Based on the TOE Framework: Evidence from China’s High-Tech Enterprises. (2025). Qiu, Mengyuan ; Yang, Jiameng ; Qian, Min.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1082-:d:1579280.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Strategic Pathways to Corporate Sustainability: The Roles of Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation. (2025). Shehadeh, Maha ; Shohaieb, Doaa ; Elmarzouky, Mahmoud ; Alreshaid, Faisal ; Simmou, Walid ; Alqatan, Ahmad.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5547-:d:1680226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How does data sharing affect the sustainable development of agribusiness? Evidence from public data openness. (2025). Yan, Jiale ; Guo, Yani ; Zhuang, Peifen.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s1059056024007779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Evaluating ESG risk ratings of mining companies: What are lessons for Ecuadors developing mining sector?. (2024). Romero, Pedro ; Fikru, Mahelet ; Soria, Rafael ; Avila-Santamaria, Jorge J ; Logan, Annaleese.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724005002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. E-commerce mineral resource footprints: Investigating drivers for sustainable mining development. (2024). Niu, Xiaoqin ; Dong, Weiwei ; Zaman, Khalid ; Naseem, Imran ; Nassani, Abdelmohsen A.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Analysing of the territorial competitiveness index in Izmir through dynamic model. (2024). Kazancoglu, Yigit ; Mangla, Sachin Kumar ; Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s030142072301142x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The pathway towards circular economy: Measuring circular advantage of eco‐innovations. (2024). Menichini, Tamara ; Brogi, Stefano.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:3005-3038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Evaluating the barriers and drivers of adopting circular economy for improving sustainability in the mining industry. (2023). Osei, Vivian ; Quayson, Matthew ; Asante-Darko, Disraeli ; Bai, Chunguang.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:86:y:2023:i:pb:s0301420723008796.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Assessing environmental, social, and governance performance and natural resource management policies in Chinas dual carbon era for a green economy. (2023). Jiang, Yihuo ; Ni, Yihan ; Guo, Xiaomei.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:85:y:2023:i:pb:s0301420723007614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Examining the Nexus between the Vs of Big Data and the Sustainable Challenges in the Textile Industry. (2022). Melo, Tereza Cristina ; de Fatima, Rosangela.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4638-:d:793010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Technological Revolution and Circular Economy Practices: A Mechanism of Green Economy. (2022). Yu, Zhang ; Rehman, Syed Abdul ; Umar, Muhammad ; Tanveer, Muhammad ; Asadov, Alam.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4524-:d:790991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Achieving Circularity through Novel Product-Service Systems in the Mining Industry: An Opportunity for Circularity. (2022). Cortes, Sebastian Perez ; Vargas, Juan Pablo ; Hurtado, Juan Pablo ; Feriz, Jose Guillermo ; Kinney, Ian Scott ; Muoz, Angelica Patricia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3614-:d:774813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world. (2022). Moktadir, Md Abdul ; de Carvalho, Daniel Estima ; Chiappetta, Charbel Jose ; Dwivedi, Ashish.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:175:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521007666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Companies’ adoption of Smart Technologies to achieve structural ambidexterity: an analysis with SEM. (2022). Lessanibahri, Sina ; Gastaldi, Luca ; Miragliotta, Giovanni ; Tedaldi, Gianluca.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s004016252100620x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Progress and trends in integrating Industry 4.0 within Circular Economy: A comprehensive literature review and future research propositions. (2022). Wankhede, Vishal A ; Luthra, Sunil ; Agrawal, Rohit ; Huisingh, Donald ; Kumar, Anil.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:559-579.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities. (2022). Farias, Susana Carla ; Sehnem, Simone ; Santos, Gabriel Dos ; Kuzma, Edson.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:236-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Exploring Sustainable Value Creation of Industry 4.0 Technologies Within the Socio-technical Perspective: A Meta-review. (2021). Braccini, Alessio Maria ; Margherita, Emanuele Gabriel.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03410741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Using Internet of Things and Distributed Ledger Technology for Digital Circular Economy Enablement: The Case of Electronic Equipment. (2021). Magrini, Chiara ; Vincenti, Nazarena ; Campadello, Luca ; Nicolas, Jana ; Berg, Holger ; Paolini, Enrico ; Bonoli, Alessandra ; Bellini, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4982-:d:545875.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Synergy between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: A Literature Review. (2021). Khalaf, Osamah Ibrahim ; Vargas, Miguel A ; Ortiz, Jesus Hamilton ; Castro, Diego F ; Tavera, Carlos Andres.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4331-:d:535376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Literature Review. (2021). Varum, Celeste ; Tavares-Lehmann, Ana Teresa.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3493-:d:521665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Circular Economy and Internet of Things: Mapping Science of Case Studies in Manufacturing Industry. (2021). Amorim, Marlene ; Reis, Joo ; Cavalieri, Adriane.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3299-:d:518840.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Exploring the Effects of Innovation Strategies and Size on Manufacturing Firms’ Productivity and Environmental Impact. (2021). Moya-Fernandez, Pablo ; Seclen-Luna, Jean Pierre ; Pereira, Angeles.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3289-:d:518625.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Learning from Failure and Success: The Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in SMEs in an Emerging Economy. (2021). Aguiaga, Eduardo ; Scheel, Carlos ; Cantu, Andrea.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1529-:d:491243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. How Does the Collaborative Economy Advance Better Product Lifetimes? A Case Study of Free-Floating Bike Sharing. (2021). Sun, Shouheng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1434-:d:489670.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Information Technology for Business Sustainability: A Literature Review with Automated Content Analysis. (2021). Marolt, Marjeta ; Vidmar, Doroteja ; Pucihar, Andreja.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1192-:d:485843.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Circular Economy Strategies for Equipment Lifetime Extension: A Systematic Review. (2021). Spirito, Maurizio ; Ferraris, Matteo ; Reis, Joao ; Goncalves, Gil ; Leone, Deborah ; Barni, Andrea ; Fontana, Alessandro ; Tringale, Agata.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1117-:d:484722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Digital Twins for the Circular Economy. (2021). Clausen, Uwe ; Kopka, Jan-Philip ; Preut, Anna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10467-:d:639552.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Toward Servitized Research: An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Product-Service Innovation. (2021). Coreynen, Wim ; Vanderstraeten, Johanna ; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8422-:d:603264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. “Is Sharing Really Caring?”: The Role of Environmental Concern and Trust Reflecting Usage Intention of “Station-Based” and “Free-Floating”—Carsharing Business Models. (2021). Marquardt, Viola ; Selinka, Sarah ; Kuhn, Marc.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7414-:d:587267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Integration of Digital Economy and Circular Economy: Current Status and Future Directions. (2021). Liu, Zhen ; Osmani, Mohamed.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7217-:d:583703.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Towards a Conceptual Development of Industry 4.0, Servitisation, and Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. (2021). Pervez, Zeeshan ; Ahmed, Shehzad ; Atif, Sehrish ; Wasim, Muhammad ; Quinn, Lorraine ; Zeb, Bassam.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6501-:d:570449.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework. (2021). Etin, Sultan ; Bocken, Nancy ; de Wolf, Catherine .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6348-:d:568260.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Business Model in Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptualization. (2021). Hernandez-Chea, Roberto ; Gurtoo, Anjula ; Jain, Akriti.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5763-:d:558963.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy. (2021). Mikalef, Patrick ; Li, Jingyue ; Blomsma, Fenna ; Kristoffersen, Eivind.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:171:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521003899.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The four smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives. (2021). Ayala, Nestor Fabian ; Mendona, Joana ; Meindl, Benjamin ; Frank, Alejandro G.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:168:y:2021:i:c:s004016252100216x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. When does it pay off to integrate sustainability in the business model? – A game-theoretic analysis. (2020). Zheng, Xinyi ; Graf-Drasch, Valerie ; Keller, Maximilian ; Gimpel, Henner ; Kammerer, Alexander.
    In: Electronic Markets.
    RePEc:spr:elmark:v:30:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-019-00361-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Sustainable Technologies for the Transition of Auditing towards a Circular Economy. (2020). Silva, Washington Lopes ; Slomski, Vilma Geni ; Reginato, Luciane ; Imoniana, Joshua Onome.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:218-:d:469573.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A Product/Service System Design Schema: Application to Big Data Analytics. (2020). Sakao, Tomohiko ; Neramballi, Abhijna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3484-:d:349925.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Integrating Virtual Reality and Digital Twin in Circular Economy Practices: A Laboratory Application Case. (2020). Terzi, Sergio ; Rocca, Roberto ; Rosa, Paolo ; Fumagalli, Luca ; Sassanelli, Claudio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2286-:d:332649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Driving the Transition to a Circular Economic Model: A Systematic Review on Drivers and Critical Success Factors in Circular Economy. (2020). Mininno, Valeria ; Dulmin, Riccardo ; Zerbino, Pierluigi ; Aloini, Davide ; Stefanini, Alessandro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10672-:d:465658.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Need for New Product Development Capabilities from Digitalization, Sustainability, and Servitization Trends. (2020). Hallstedt, Sophie I ; Isaksson, Ola ; Ronnback, Anna Ohrwall.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10222-:d:458303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework. (2020). Abbate, Tindara ; Piccarozzi, Michela ; Aquilani, Barbara ; Codini, Anna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8943-:d:435842.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Systematic Literature Review—Effects of PSS on Sustainability Based on Use Case Assessments. (2020). Bluher, Till ; Riedelsheimer, Theresa ; Gogineni, Sonika ; Stark, Rainer ; Klemichen, Antje.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6989-:d:404944.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Sustainability—Bibliometric Literature Review. (2020). Ejsmont, Krzysztof ; Gladysz, Bartlomiej ; Kluczek, Aldona.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5650-:d:384180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. (2020). Kitukutha, Nicodemus ; Aburumman, Nemer ; Khan, Muhammad Asif ; Olah, Judit ; Popp, Jozsef ; Haddad, Hossam.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4674-:d:368652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?. (2020). Nedelko, Zlatko ; Renar, Rok.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4417-:d:364304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Towards Circular Economy in the Household Appliance Industry: An Overview of Cases. (2020). Saccani, Nicola ; Perona, Marco ; Baccanelli, Irene ; Bressanelli, Gianmarco.
    In: Resources.
    RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:128-:d:439495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Industry 4.0 and Social Development in the Aspect of Sustainable Development: Relations in EC Countries. (2020). Sinicakova, Marianna ; Wyrwa, Joanna ; Jedrzejczak-Gas, Janina ; Barska, Anetta.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:1068-1097.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. (2020). Mikalef, Patrick ; Li, Jingyue ; Blomsma, Fenna ; Kristoffersen, Eivind.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:120:y:2020:i:c:p:241-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives. (2020). Bleischwitz, Raimund ; de Giacomo, Maria Rosa.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:8:p:3352-3369.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead. (2020). Clauss, Thomas ; Beliaeva, Tatiana ; Kraus, Sascha ; Ferasso, Marcos ; Soriano, Domingo Ribeiro.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:8:p:3006-3024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. The Millennials’ Effect: How Can Their Personal Values Shape the Future Business Environment of Industry 4.0?. (2019). Rok, Renar ; Senta, Jevenak.
    In: Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy.
    RePEc:vrs:ngooec:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:57-65:n:5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry: Past Achievements and Future Promises. (2019). Reim, Wiebke ; Parida, Vinit ; Sjodin, David.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:391-:d:197498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Overcoming the Main Barriers of Circular Economy Implementation through a New Visualization Tool for Circular Business Models. (2019). Pellegrini, Marco ; Rossi, Jessica ; Bianchini, Augusto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6614-:d:290059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. Circular Strategies Enabled by the Internet of Things—A Framework and Analysis of Current Practice. (2019). Balkenende, Ruud ; Kortuem, Gerd ; Ingemarsdotter, Emilia ; Jamsin, Ella.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5689-:d:276662.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Eco-Innovation: A Study of Energy Companies. (2019). Johl, Satirenjit Kaur ; Munodawafa, Russell Tatenda.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4254-:d:255298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Digitális átalakulás és fenntarthatóság. A technológiaoptimista környezetgazdászok és a pesszimista ökológiai közgazdászok közötti vita újraindítása. (2018). Szalavetz, Andrea.
    In: Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences).
    RePEc:ksa:szemle:1800.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. (2018). Gatti, Corrado ; Piccarozzi, Michela ; Aquilani, Barbara.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3821-:d:177379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges. (2018). Bonilla, Silvia H ; Gonalves, Rodrigo Franco ; da Silva, Marcia Terra ; Sacomano, Jose B.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3740-:d:176288.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  60. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 06:29:31 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.