create a website

The ESG–financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter?. (2021). Nekhili, Mehdi ; Nagati, Haithem ; Boukadhaba, Amal.
In: Corporate Governance: An International Review.
RePEc:bla:corgov:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:134-161.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 66

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Unforeseen benefits: Can ESG enhance corporate access to commercial credit financing?. (2025). Yang, Xiaodong ; Shira, Ruba Khalid ; Dang, Lan Phuong ; Hao, PU.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:75:y:2025:i:c:s0275531924005282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Sentry eyes? Women directors and corporate penalties. (2024). GULL, Ammar ; Ahsan, Tanveer ; Qureshi, Muhammad Azeem.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04844672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. CEO narcissism and ESG misconduct. (2024). Martinez-Ferrero, Jennifer ; Garcia-Meca, Emma ; Ramon-Llorens, Camino M.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:69:y:2024:i:c:s0275531924000771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. ESG performance and innovation quality. (2024). Li, Yanqiong.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:1361-1373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Executive team restructuring and corporate ESG disclosure quality. (2024). Liu, Yong ; Bai, Chengyu.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:66:y:2024:i:c:s1544612324006846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Awaysheh, A., Heron, R. A., Perry, T., & Wilson, J. I. (2020). On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41, 965–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3122.

  2. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z.

  4. Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010.

  5. Berrone, P., & Gomez‐Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency‐institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461950.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bingham, J. B., Dyer, W. G., Smith, I., & Adams, G. L. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0669-9.

  7. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19, 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930008800475.

  8. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7.

  9. Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2005). The value‐creating board: Theory and evidence. Norwegian School of Management. Research Report 8/2005 (BI, Oslo).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, 1281–1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02222.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1701–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Cahan, S., De Villiers, C., Jeter, D., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. (2016). Are CSR disclosures value relevant? Cross‐country evidence. European Accounting Review, 25, 579–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1064009.

  13. Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1595–1603. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005748230228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Cronqvist, H., Heyman, F., Nilsson, M., Svaleryd, H., & Vlachos, J. (2009). Do entrenched managers pay their workers more? The Journal of Finance, 64, 309–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01435.x.

  15. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.19113846.1996.tb00489.x.

  16. Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5, 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910987558.

  18. Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. P. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00357.x.

  19. El Akremi, A., Gond, J. P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2018). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, 44, 619–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315569311.

  20. Faleye, O., Mehrotra, V., & Morck, R. (2006). When labor has a voice in corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41, 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000002519.

  21. Fauver, L., & Fuerst, M. E. (2006). Does good corporate governance include employee representation? Evidence from German corporate boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 673–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.005.

  22. Ginglinger, E., Megginson, W., & Waxin, T. (2011). Employee ownership, board representation, and corporate financial policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 868–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.03.005.

  23. Gold, M., & Waddington, J. (2019). Board‐level employee representation in Europe: State of play. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 25, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680119830556.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Gordon, J. N., & Roe, M. J. (2004). Convergence and persistence in corporate governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665905.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.5465/256611.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Guedri, Z., & Hollandts, X. (2008). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear impact of employee ownership on firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00703.x.

  27. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z.

  28. Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility—Where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004.

  29. Hammer, T. H., Currall, S. C., & Stern, R. N. (1991). Worker representation on boards of directors: A study of competing roles. ILR Review, 44, 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399104400404.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H.

  31. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business & Society, 40, 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000304.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hollandts, X., & Aubert, N. (2011). La représentation obligatoire des actionnaires salariés au conseil d'administration: un état des lieux. Gestion, 2000(28), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.3917/g2000.286.0015.

  33. Hollandts, X., Aubert, N., Abdelhamid, A., & Prieur, V. (2018). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear impact of employee ownership on CEO entrenchment. Management International, 22, 112–164. https://doi.org/10.7202/1058165ar.

  34. Huse, M., Nielsen, S. T., & Hagen, I. M. (2009). Women and employee‐elected board members, and their contributions to board control tasks. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0018-4.

  35. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Rights and production functions: An application to labor‐managed firms and codetermination. Journal of Business, 52, 469–506. https://doi.org/10.1086/296060.

  36. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/256977.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal‐based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 383–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0848.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2.

  39. King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis, 27, 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.11.

  40. Kleinknecht, R. H. (2015). Employee participation in corporate governance: Implications for company resilience. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680114523820.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2019). Farewell editorial: Exiting editors' perspective on current and future challenges in corporate governance research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 27, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12268.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 553–563. https://doi.org/10.5465/256976.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Macaulay, C. D., Richard, O. C., Peng, M. W., & Hasenhuttl, M. (2018). Alliance network centrality, board composition, and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3566-7.

  44. Markey, R., McIvor, J., & Wright, C. F. (2016). Employee participation and carbon emissions reduction in Australian workplaces. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1045009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3.

  46. Nekhili, M., Boukadhaba, A., Nagati, H., & Chtioui, T. (2019). ESG performance and market value: the moderating role of employee board representation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1629989.

  47. Nekhili, M., Gull, A. A., Chtioui, T., & Radouane, I. (2020). Gender diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 47, 52–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12409.

  48. O'brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Pagano, M. S., Sinclair, G., & Yang, T. (2018). Understanding ESG ratings and ESG indexes. In Research Handbook of Finance and ESG (p. 339). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432636.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Pagano, M., & Volpin, P. F. (2005). Managers, workers, and corporate control. The Journal of Finance, 60, 841–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00748.x.

  51. Poulain‐Rehm, T., & Lepers, X. (2013). Does employee ownership benefit value creation? The case of France (2001–2005). Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1255-0.

  52. Preuss, L., Haunschild, A., & Matten, D. (2009). The rise of CSR: Implications for HRM and employee representation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190902770893.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Radhouane, I., Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., & Paché, G. (2018). The impact of corporate environmental reporting on customer‐related performance and market value. Management Decision, 56, 1630–1659. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2017-0272.

  54. Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23, 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12086.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Semenova, N., & Hassel, L. G. (2015). On the validity of environmental performance metrics. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2323-4.

  57. Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9.

  58. Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35, 748–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02090.x.

  59. Triana, M. D. C., Jayasinghe, M., Pieper, J. R., Delgado, D. M., & Li, M. (2019). Perceived workplace gender discrimination and employee consequences: A meta‐analysis and complementary studies considering country context. Journal of Management, 45, 2419–2447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318776772.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/257057.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6.

  62. Van der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2008). Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9398-0.

  63. Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2016-0001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33, 885–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952.

  65. Weber, J., & Gladstone, J. (2014). Rethinking the corporate financial–social performance relationship: Examining the complex, multi‐stakeholder notion of corporate social performance. Business and Society Review, 119, 297–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12035.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Zhang, M., Di Fan, D., & Zhu, C. J. (2014). High‐performance work systems, corporate social performance and employee outcomes: Exploring the missing links. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1672-8.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Collider bias in strategy and management research: An illustration using women CEOs effect on other womens career outcomes. (2024). Uribe, Jose ; Hagemann, Andreas ; Frake, Justin.
    In: Strategic Management Journal.
    RePEc:bla:stratm:v:45:y:2024:i:7:p:1393-1419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance in the energy sector: Evidence from Lithuania. (2023). Rudzioniene, Kristina ; Adamkaite, Judita ; Streimikiene, Dalia.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:1:p:91-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Does corporate environmental responsibility contribute to financial performance? A dual path analysis through operational efficiency and the cost of debt. (2023). Wan, Liang ; Gao, Lan.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:1:p:308-323.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Exploring the financial consequences of biodiversity disclosure: how does biodiversity disclosure affect firms financial performance?. (2023). Abdelkhalik, Raghda Abdellatif.
    In: Future Business Journal.
    RePEc:spr:futbus:v:9:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-023-00202-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Green Finance Policy and ESG Performance: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms. (2023). Gan, Zhuojiong ; Sun, Xiuli ; Zhou, Cui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6781-:d:1125813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Corporate Sustainability Communication as ‘Fake News’: Firms’ Greenwashing on Twitter. (2023). Webster, Jane ; Oppong-Tawiah, Divinus.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6683-:d:1123927.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Media Attention. (2023). Fu, Tao ; Han, Shengyue ; Liang, Rui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5023-:d:1095069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Analysis of the Motivation behind Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the csQCA Approach. (2023). Xie, YI ; Shao, Yaxin ; Fan, Haotian ; Xiong, Feng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10622-:d:1187630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Exploring the Impact of Firm Transparency on Green Innovation Legitimacy: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China. (2023). Xia, Yuntian ; Hou, Junhao ; Ding, Hongmei ; Huang, Hong ; Liu, Dongping.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10104-:d:1179484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sensitivity of market performance to social risk index: Evidence from global listed companies in logistics and transportation industry. (2023). najaf, khakan ; Atayah, Osama F ; Nasrallah, Nohade ; Dhiaf, Mohamed M ; Marashdeh, Hazem ; Frederico, Guilherme F.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:87:y:2023:i:pa:s0038012123000368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The impact of the ESG disclosure on sell-side analysts’ target prices: The new era post Paris agreements. (2023). Bolognesi, Enrica ; Burchi, Alberto.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:64:y:2023:i:c:s0275531922002136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How historical and social aspirations reshape the relationship between corporate financial performance and corporate social responsibility. (2023). Angelidou, Sofia ; Saridakis, Charalampos ; Woodside, Arch G.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:157:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322010189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Equal gains and pains? Analyzing corporate financial performance for industrial corporate social performance leaders and laggards. (2023). Liu, Ying ; Hyun, Soonchul ; Kim, Jongmin.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:155:y:2023:i:pb:s0148296322008797.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance. (2023). Moon, Jon Jungbien ; Shin, Jiyoung ; Kang, Jingoo.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:32:y:2023:i:3:s0969593122000993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Interlinkage between corporate social, environmental performance and financial performance: Firm-mediators in a multi-country context. (2023). Deb, Soumya G ; Dasgupta, Ranjan.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:52:y:2023:i:c:s1544612322005633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Mitigating endogeneity in corporate social responsibility research: An investigation using a neoclassical production function. (2022). Briggs, Kristie ; Neuman, Eric J ; Kruse, Derek.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:1:p:3-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Revisiting the association between environmental performance and financial performance: Does the level of environmental orientation matter?. (2022). GULL, Ammar ; Mushtaq, Rizwan ; Suleman, Muhammad Tahir ; Saeed, Asif.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1647-1662.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: The moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation. (2022). Adomako, Samuel ; Tran, Mai Dong.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1414-1423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of product and service‐based firms listed on London Stock Exchange. (2022). Olarewaju, Jesuleke I ; Elmghaamez, Ibrahim Khalifa.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1370-1383.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The influence of corporate social responsibilities on sustainable financial performance: Mediating role of shared vision capabilities and moderating role of entrepreneurship. (2022). Luo, Wenbo ; Li, Minxin ; Zhang, Chuan.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1266-1282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Wheat and chaff: the degree to which strategic management principles are integrated within corporate social responsibility reporting among large Canadian firms. (2022). Fuller, Mark.
    In: International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:7:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-022-00075-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Does corporate social responsibility disclosure impact firm performance? An industry-wise analysis of Indian firms. (2022). Kashiramka, Smita ; Singh, Shveta ; Hasan, Iram.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01859-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Does winning a CSR Award increase firm value?. (2022). Benjamin, Samuel Jebaraj ; Biswas, Pallab Kumar.
    In: International Journal of Disclosure and Governance.
    RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:19:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1057_s41310-022-00142-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Investment Inefficiency and Corporate Social Responsibility. (2022). Rao, Xudong ; Parmeter, Christopher ; Engida, Tadesse Getacher.
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:58:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-022-00641-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Are Socially Responsible Firms Associated with Socially Responsible Citizens? A Study of Social Distancing During the Covid-19 Pandemic. (2022). Tang, Zhenyang ; Xu, Xiaowei ; Breton-Miller, Isabelle.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:179:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-021-04858-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Unleashing the Role of CSR and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior for Organizational Success: The Role of Connectedness to Nature. (2022). Cismaș, Laura ; Hongxin, Wang ; Saleem, Usama ; Khan, Mohammed Arshad ; Ali, Mohammad Athar ; Negru, Lucia ; Zhenqiang, Jian.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3191-:d:766863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation with Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Financial, and Environmental Performance: The Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industries. (2022). Xu, Xiaoyang ; Lohana, Sonia ; Imran, Muhammad ; Ayaz, Muhammad.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16951-:d:1006695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Firm Performance: The Inverted-U Shape Contingent on Founder CEO. (2022). Xue, Yajiong ; Wang, Qian ; Chen, Huiru ; Liang, Huigang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11340-:d:911326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection. (2022). Liu, Xinwang ; Wu, Qun ; Deveci, Muhammet ; Zhou, Ligang ; Qin, Jindong ; Mardani, Abbas.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:184:y:2022:i:c:s004016252200498x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling. (2022). Zhou, Yusheng ; Li, Xue ; Yuen, Kum Fai.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:220:y:2022:i:c:s0951832021007766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. How do corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovativeness increase financial gains? A customer perspective analysis. (2022). Ghanbarpour, Tohid ; Gustafsson, Anders.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:140:y:2022:i:c:p:471-481.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The fundamental effects of ESG disclosure quality in boosting the growth of ESG investing. (2022). Yu, LI ; Cho, Ken ; Gao, Jijun ; Wen, Hui.
    In: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.
    RePEc:eee:intfin:v:81:y:2022:i:c:s1042443122001275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. (2022). Managi, Shunsuke ; Yoo, Sunbin.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:44:y:2022:i:c:s1544612321001896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Cultural diversity among directors and corporate social responsibility. (2022). Frijns, Bart ; Dodd, Olga ; Garel, Alexandre.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s1057521922002873.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Pre-deal differences in corporate social responsibility and acquisition performance. (2022). Hussain, Tanveer ; Shams, Syed.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:81:y:2022:i:c:s1057521922000540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Does waste management affect firm performance? International evidence. (2022). GULL, Ammar ; Ahsan, Tanveer ; Atif, Muhammad ; Derouiche, Imen.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s026499932200178x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Environmental Performance, Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Chinese Heavy Polluted Industries. (2022). San, Ong Tze ; Anqi, Chen.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-03-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Building knowledge by mapping model uncertainty in six studies of social and financial performance. (2022). Berchicci, Luca ; King, Andrew A.
    In: Strategic Management Journal.
    RePEc:bla:stratm:v:43:y:2022:i:7:p:1319-1346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Corporate social responsibility performance and the reputational incentives of independent directors. (2022). Lim, Youngdeok ; Lu, Louise Y ; Monroe, Gary S ; Khoo, Eunice S.
    In: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.
    RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:49:y:2022:i:5-6:p:841-881.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Being good at being good—The mediating role of an environmental management system in value‐creating green supply chain management practices. (2022). Jellojobor, Maria ; Raha, Aveed.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:1964-1984.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: An Empirical Literature Review. (2021). ACHOUR, Zyed ; Hlioui, Zeineb ; Boukattaya, Sonia.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03472433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. (2021). Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki ; Li, Ting-Ting ; Wang, Kai.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11663-:d:662015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The impact of social responsibility on financial performance: evidence from Romanian companies. (2021). Lakiss, Nour.
    In: Journal of Financial Studies.
    RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:58-76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility. (2021). Zhu, Minghao ; Zhou, Honggeng.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:240:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321001900.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Hedge fund investor activism and human capital loss. (2021). Shi, Wei ; Meyerdoyle, Philipp ; Chen, Guoli.
    In: Strategic Management Journal.
    RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:12:p:2328-2354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The ESG–financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter?. (2021). Nekhili, Mehdi ; Nagati, Haithem ; Boukadhaba, Amal.
    In: Corporate Governance: An International Review.
    RePEc:bla:corgov:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:134-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. The management of sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of the effects of environmental performance on economic performance. (2021). Sedita, Silvia Rita ; Bassetti, Thomas ; Blasi, Silvia.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:21-37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Does Technological Innovation Drive Corporate Sustainability? Empirical Evidence for the European Financial Industry in Catching-Up and Central and Eastern Europe Countries. (2020). Estelles-Miguel, Sofia ; Rojas-Alvarado, Ronald ; Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis ; Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2261-:d:332333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Correlation between the DJSI Chile and the Financial Indices of Chilean Companies. (2020). Chahuan-Jimenez, Karime.
    In: IJFS.
    RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:74-:d:451333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Parent Firm Corporate Social Responsibility and Overseas Subsidiary Performance: A Signaling Perspective. (2020). Makino, Shige ; Jung, Jae C ; Jiang, Guoliang Frank.
    In: Journal of World Business.
    RePEc:eee:worbus:v:55:y:2020:i:6:s1090951620300699.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 22:30:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.