create a website

What do (future) civil servants think of bribery and corruption? Evidence from India. (2023). Gupta, Saurabh ; Birner, Regina ; Verma, Rajiv.
In: Development Policy Review.
RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:3:n:e12673.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 45

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2002). An experimental bribery game. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 428–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/18.2.428.

  2. Afridi, F., Iversen, V., & Sharan, M. R. (2017). Women political leaders, corruption and learning: Evidence from a large public program in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 66(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/693679.

  3. Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay tax? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047‐2727(92)90040‐m.

  4. Berninghaus, S. K., Haller, S., Krüger, T., Neumann, T., Schosser, S., & Vogt, B. (2013). Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a corruption game—an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.004.

  5. Besley, T. (2006). Principled agents? Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2000). Assessing political will for anti‐corruption efforts: An analytical framework. Public Administration and Development, 20(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099‐162X(200008)20:3<239::AID‐PAD138>3.0.CO;2‐3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Burnham, T., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (2000). Friend–or foe–intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economics Behaviour and Organisation, 43, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167‐2681(00)00108‐6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911408109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Dupuy, K., & Neset, S. (2018). The cognitive psychology of corruption (U4 Issue No. 2018:2). U4 Anti‐Corruption Resource Centre at Chr. Michelsen Institute. https://www.u4.no/publications/the‐cognitive‐psychology‐of‐corruption.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Fjeldstad, O. H. (2003). Fighting fiscal corruption: Lessons from the Tanzania Revenue Authority. Public Administration and Development, 23(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.278.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Frank, B., & Schulze, G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167‐2681(00)00111‐6.

  12. Gouveal, R., Montoya, M., & Walsh, S. (2013). How the corruption quadruple helix affects BRIC: A case study of corruption in big emerging economies. Journal of Politics and Law, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v6n2p1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Gupta, K. N. (2001). Corruption in India. Anmol Publication.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Hanna, R., & Wang, S.‐Y. (2017). Dishonesty and selection into public service: Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150029.

  15. Heidenheimer, A. (2006). Political corruption: Concepts and contexts. Transaction Publishers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Klitgaard, R. (1998). International cooperation against corruption. Finance & Development, 35(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451953220.022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Knox, C. (2009). Dealing with sectoral corruption in Bangladesh: Developing citizen involvement. Public Administration and Development, 29(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Kohli, S. (1975). The psychology of corruption. In S. Kohli (Ed.), Corruption in India. Chetana Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Lawson, L. (2009). The politics of anti‐corruption reform in Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(1), 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x08003662.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Manzetti, L., & Wilson, C. J. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005285759.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2018). Grappling with the “real politics” of systemic corruption: Theoretical debates versus “real‐world” functions. Governance, 31(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12311.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Marquette, H., Pavarala, V., & Malik, K. K. (2014). Religion and attitudes towards corruption in India: A collective action problem? Development in Practice, 24(7), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2014.942215.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Mathur, N. (2017). Eating money: Corruption and its categorical ‘Other’ in the leaky Indian state. Modern Asian Studies, 51(6), 1796–1817. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x16000846.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 10(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696.

  27. Peiffer, C., & Rose, R. (2018). Why are the poor more vulnerable to bribery in Africa? The institutional effects of services. Journal of Development Studies, 54(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1257121.

  28. Peiffer, C., & Walton, G. (2022). Getting the (right) message across: How to encourage citizens to report corruption. Development Policy Review, 40(5), e1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12621.

  29. Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail? Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institution, 26(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐0491.2012.01604.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Pisor, A. C., Gervais, M., Purzycki, B. G., & Ross, C. T. (2020). Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human behaviour. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 192090. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192090.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Quah, J. S. T. (2008). Curbing corruption in India: An impossible dream? Asian Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370802504266.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Roman, A. V. (2016). Studying corruption: Reflections on the methodological, practical, and personal challenges. Qualitative Sociological Review, 12(3), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733‐8077.12.3.01.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Rose‐Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Schulze, G., & Frank, B. (2003). Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: Experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility. Economics of Governance, 4, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010200059.

  35. Shah, A. (2007). Tailoring the fight against corruption to country circumstances. In A. Shah (Ed.), Performance accountability and combating corruption. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978‐0‐8213‐6941‐8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Sharma, A. (2012, April 14). Govt paper admits corruption at all levels in civil services. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/government-paper-admits-to-babu-and-politician-nexus-99069-2012-04-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Singh , N. K. , & Stern , N. ( 2013 ). Introduction . In N. K. Singh & N. Stern (Eds.), The New Bihar . Harper Collins.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Sööt, M. L., & Rootalu, K. (2012). Institutional trust and opinions of corruption. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.616.

  39. Spangler, W. D., Tikhomirov, A., Sotak, K. L., & Palrecha, R. ( 2014 ). Leader motive profiles in eight types of organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (6), 1080 – 1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.10.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Spear, P. (1938). Bentinck and education. Cambridge Historical Journal, 6(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474691300003814.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Sulemana, I., Iddrisu, A. M., & Kyoore, J. E. (2017). A micro‐level study of the relationship between experienced corruption and subjective wellbeing in Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 53(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1187721.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Turner, M. (2013). Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence. Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1655.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Vaidya, R. (2019). Corruption, re‐corruption and what transpires in between: The case of a government officer in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551‐017‐3612‐5.

  44. Van Rijckeghem, C., & Weder, B. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: Do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much? Journal of Development Economics, 65(2), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304‐3878(01)00139‐0.

  45. Vittal, N. (2012). Ending corruption: How to clean up India? Viking.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Tragedy of Corruption. Corruption as a social dilemma. (2015). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Chen, Ye-Feng ; Jiang, Shu-Guang .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:1531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The Donor Problem. (2015). Ellman, Matthew ; Abbink, Klaus.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Does Social Judgement Diminish Rule Breaking?. (2013). Serra, Danila.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:wps/2013-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Punishment Regimes for Bribery. (2013). Goerg, Sebastian ; Engel, Christoph ; Yu, Gaoneng.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2012_01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Delegating decision rights for anticipated rewards as an alternative to corruption: An experiment. (2013). Vetter, Stefan.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:31:y:2013:i:c:p:188-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The impact of risk perception and risk attitudes on corrupt behavior: Evidence from a petty corruption experiment. (2012). Fahr, René ; Djawadi, Behnud Mir.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc12:62022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Experiments in culture and corruption : a review. (2012). Eckel, Catherine ; Banuri, Sheheryar.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6064.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Delegation and Rewards. (2012). Vetter, Stefan.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems.
    RePEc:trf:wpaper:378.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Letting the briber go free: an experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. (2012). Jain, Tarun ; Gangadharan, Lata ; Dasgupta, Utteeyo ; Abbink, Klaus.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:42176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Delegation and Rewards. (2012). Vetter, Stefan.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:12884.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Side-Payments and the Costs of Conflict.. (2012). Sheremeta, Roman ; Kimbrough, Erik.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:chu:wpaper:12-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Gender and Corruption: Lessons from Laboratory Corruption Experiments. (2011). Frank, Björn ; Boehm, Frédéric ; Lambsdorff, Johann Graf ; Frédéric Boehm, ; Björn Frank, .
    In: The European Journal of Development Research.
    RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:23:y:2011:i:1:p:59-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Power comes with responsibility—or does it?. (2011). Bolle, Friedel ; Vogel, Claudia.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:148:y:2011:i:3:p:459-470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Corrupt reciprocity - Experimental evidence on a mens game. (2011). Frank, Björn ; Lambsdorff, Johann Graf.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:116-125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A controlled field experiment on corruption. (2011). Boly, Amadou ; Armantier, Olivier.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:55:y:2011:i:8:p:1072-1082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. LEGAL CORRUPTION. (2011). Vicente, Pedro ; Kaufmann, Daniel.
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:23:y:2011:i:2:p:195-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs About Others. (2010). Perez-Truglia, Ricardo ; Di Tella, Rafael.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16645.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. (2010). Serra, Danila ; Barr, Abigail.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:94:y:2010:i:11-12:p:862-869.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Bribing versus gift-giving - An experiment. (2010). Frank, Björn ; Lambsdorff, Johann Graf.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:31:y:2010:i:3:p:347-357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Make Him an Offer He Can’t Refuse: Avoiding Conflicts through Side Payments. (2010). Sheremeta, Roman ; Kimbrough, Erik.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:chu:wpaper:10-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The effects of externalities and framing on bribery in a petty corruption experiment. (2009). Serra, Danila ; Barr, Abigail.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:12:y:2009:i:4:p:488-503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Subject pool effects in a corruption experiment: A comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students. (2009). Gangadharan, Lata ; Erkal, Nisvan ; Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Cameron, Lisa ; Alatas, Vivi.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:113-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore. (2009). Gangadharan, Lata ; Erkal, Nisvan ; Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Cameron, Lisa.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:93:y:2009:i:7-8:p:843-851.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Corruption in public service delivery: An experimental analysis. (2009). Serneels, Pieter ; Barr, Abigail ; Lindelow, Magnus.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:72:y:2009:i:1:p:225-239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. An experiment on corruption and gender. (2008). Rivas, M. Fernanda.
    In: ThE Papers.
    RePEc:gra:wpaper:08/10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Combining Top-down and Bottom-up Accountability: Evidence from a Bribery Experiment.. (2008). Serra, Danila.
    In: CSAE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:csa:wpaper:2008-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Can Corruption Be Studied in the Lab? Comparing a Field and a Lab Experiment. (2008). Boly, Amadou ; Armantier, Olivier.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2008s-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Testing Leniency Programs Experimentally: The Impact of “Natural” Framing. (2008). Ortmann, Andreas ; Krajcova, Jana .
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Testing Leniency Programs Experimentally: The Impact of Change in Parameterization. (2008). Krajcova, Jana .
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Corrupt reciprocity: An experiment. (2007). Frank, Björn ; Lambsdorff, Johann Graf.
    In: Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe.
    RePEc:zbw:upadvr:v5107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Externality and framing effects in a bribery experiment. (2007). Serra, Danila ; Barr, Abigail.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:wps/2007-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Transparency, wages, and the separation of powers: An experimental analysis of corruption. (2007). Nelson, William.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:130:y:2007:i:3:p:471-493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Computational Difficulty of Bribery in Qualitative Coalitional Games. (2007). McBurney, Peter ; Wooldridge, Michael ; Dowell, Andrew.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2007.100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. An experiment on corruption and gender. (2006). Rivas, M. Fernanda.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Subject Pool Effects in a Corruption Experiment: A Comparison of Indonesian Public Servants and Indonesian Students. (2006). Gangadharan, Lata ; Erkal, Nisvan ; Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Cameron, Lisa ; Alatas, Vivi.
    In: Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:mlb:wpaper:975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Neutral versus loaded instructions in a bribery experiment. (2006). Hennig-Schmidt, Heike ; Abbink, Klaus.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:9:y:2006:i:2:p:103-121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Heterogeneous Social Preferences and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods. (2006). Gächter, Simon ; Fischbacher, Urs ; Gachter, Simon.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public goods. (2005). Gächter, Simon ; Fischbacher, Urs ; Gachter, Simon.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The donor problem. (2005). Ellman, Matthew ; Abbink, Klaus.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:796.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Understanding Corruption and Corruptibility Through Experiments. (2005). Ortmann, Andreas ; Lizal, Lubomir ; Dusek, Libor ; Duek, Libor.
    In: Prague Economic Papers.
    RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2005:y:2005:i:2:id:259:p:147-162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Do Attitudes Towards Corruption Differ Across Cultures? Experimental Evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia andSingapore. (2005). Gangadharan, Lata ; Erkal, Nisvan ; Chaudhuri, Ananish ; Cameron, Lisa.
    In: Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:mlb:wpaper:943.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Corruption as Betrayal : Experimental Evidence on Corruption Under Delegation. (2005). .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00180044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Corruption as Betrayal : Experimental Evidence on Corruption Under Delegation. (2005). Jacquemet, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:0506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY OR ONESELF: THE PUBLIC SERVANTS DILEMMA. (2004). Serneels, Pieter ; Barr, Abigail ; Lindelow, Magnus.
    In: Development and Comp Systems.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0409035.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. To serve the community or oneself - the public servants dilemma. (2004). Serneels, Pieter ; Barr, Abigail ; Lindelow, Magnus.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: an experimental study. (2004). Abbink, Klaus.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:20:y:2004:i:4:p:887-906.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Wie lässt sich Korruption wirksam bekämpfen?: Empirische Befunde aus der experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung. (2004). Renner, Elke.
    In: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwvjh:73-20-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Der Fall Russland: Korruption als Kollateralschaden der Transformation?. (2004). Stykow, Petra.
    In: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwvjh:73-20-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. To serve the community or oneself: the public servant`s dilemma. (2003). Lindelow, Magnus ; Barr, Abigail.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:wps/2003-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Fairness in the Labour Market � A Survey of Experimental Results. (). Gächter, Simon ; Fehr, Ernst.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-29 07:44:52 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.