create a website

Fostering global value chains through international agreements: Evidence from Vietnam. (2021). Milner, Helen V ; Malesky, Edmund J.
In: Economics and Politics.
RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:443-482.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 82

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Exploring the relationship between development aid and FDI from developed countries in developing countries: empirical insights from Japanese firm-level data. (2024). Bertrand, Olivier ; Betschinger, Marie-Ann.
    In: Journal of International Business Studies.
    RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:55:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1057_s41267-024-00688-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies. (2024). Baker, Nicole B ; Haddad, Christian.
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:764-791.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aisbett, E., Busse, M., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2018). Bilateral investment treaties as deterrents of host‐country discretion: the impact of investor‐state disputes on foreign direct investment in developing countries. Review of World Economics, 154(1), 119–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290‐017‐0285‐1.

  2. Alfaro, L., Chor, D., Antras, P., & Conconi, P. (2019). Internalizing global value chains: A firm‐level analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2), 508–559.

  3. Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2011). Contingent credibility: The impact of investment treaty violations on foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65(3), 401–432.

  4. Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties. World Politics, 66(1), 47–87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Alschner, W. (2017). The impact of investment arbitration on investment treaty design: Myths versus reality. Yale J. Int’l L., 42, 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Antras, P. (2015). Global production: Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Princeton University Press.

  7. Arias, E., Hollyer, J. R., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2018). Cooperative autocracies: Leader survival, creditworthiness, and bilateral investment treaties. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 905–921.

  8. Barklie, G. (2019). Mozambique tops 2017 greenfield fdi performance index. fDi Intelligence. (Available from https://www.fdiintelligence.com/Rankings/Mozambique‐tops‐2017‐Greenfield‐FDI‐Performance‐Index. (accessed March 5, 2019).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Beazer, Q. H., & Blake, D. J. (2018). The conditional nature of political risk: How home institutions influence the location of Foreign direct investment. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 470–485.

  10. Beck, T., & Levine, R. (2005). Legal institutions and financial development. Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 251–278). Springer.

  11. Berger, A., & Bruhn, D. (2016). Deep preferential trade agreements and upgrading in global value chains: The case of vietnam. Berlin, Germany: Deutsches Institut f¨ur Entwicklungspolitik.

  12. Berger, A., & Bruhn, D. (2017). mar). Vietnam’s preferential trade agreements: Implications for GVC participation and upgrading. In Vietnam at a crossroads: Engaging in the next generation of global value chains (pp. 81–98). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Berger, A., Busse, M., Nunnenkamp, P., & Roy, M. (2013). Do trade and investment agreements lead to more FDI? Accounting for key provisions inside the black box. International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(2), 247–275.

  14. Blackaby, N. (2006). Investment arbitration and commercial arbitration (or the tale of the dolphin and the shark). Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, 217–233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2008). The politics of Foreign direct investment into developing countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements? American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 741–762.

  16. Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2014). Foreign direct investment and institutional diversity in trade agreements: Credibility, commitment, and economic flows to the developing world. World Politics, 66(1).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Carter, D. B., Wellhausen, R. L., & Huth, P. K. (2018). International law, territorial disputes, and Foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly, sqy046.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Chen, F., & Xu, J. (2019). Mnc lawsuit outcomes in authoritarian courts: Evidence from new litigation data.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Cho, S.‐J., Kim, Y. K., & Lee, C.‐S. (2016). Credibility, preferences, and bilateral investment treaties. The Review of International Organizations, 11(1), 25–58.

  20. Dang, D. N., Minh, K., & Tran, L. (2018). Vietnam. The International Arbitration Review, August(9),(Available from https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the‐international‐arbitration‐review‐edition‐9/1171773/vietnam).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Daude, C., & Stein, E. (2007). The quality of institutions and Foreign direct investment. Economics & Politics, 19(3), 317–344.

  22. Drahozal, C. R. (2017). Parties and affected others: Signatories and nonsignatories to international arbitration agreements. (Working Paper. Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_:id=3125546).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Dreher, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Does membership in international organizations increase governments’ credibility? Testing the effects of delegating powers. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3), 326–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.003.

  24. Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2008). Economic institutions and fdi location choice: Evidence from us multinationals in china. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(3), 412–429.

  25. Dugan, C., Wallace, D., Rubins, N., & Sabahi, B. (2011). Investor‐state arbitration. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Dzung, N. M., & Minh Ha, D. V. (2018). IBA Arbitration Guide 2018‐ VIETNAM (Tech. Rep.). Ho Chi Minh City: International Bar Association. (Report. Available from,https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=4DCE3539‐D1B4‐4251‐B850‐0B6C61DC0105).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Eurocham (2017). Report on vietnam business forum mid‐term meeting in. June 2017. (6 June. Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from https://www.Eurochamvn.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Sector%20Committees/VBF%20Report_Advocacy_19June2017%20‐%20edited%20long%20version.pdf).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Fang, S., & Owen, E. (2011). International institutions and credible commitment of non‐democracies. The Review of International Organizations, 6(2), 141–162.

  29. Gerber, A. S., Arceneaux, K., Boudreau, C., Dowling, C., & Hillygus, D. S. (2015). Reporting balance tables, response rates and manipulation checks in experimental research: A reply from the committee that prepared the reporting guidelines. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.20.

  30. Ginsburg, T. (2005). International substitutes for domestic institutions: Bilateral investment treaties and governance. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(1), 107–123.

  31. Graham, B. A. T., Johnston, N. P., & Kingsley, A. F. (2018). Even constrained governments take. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(8), 1784–1813.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Greene, W. (2004). The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. The Econometrics Journal, 7(1), 98–119.

  33. Haftel, Y. Z. (2010). Ratification counts: US investment treaties and FDI flows into developing countries. Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 348–377.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Hale, T. N. (2015). Between interests and law. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Hallward‐Driemeier, M. (2003). Do bilateral investment treaties attract foreign direct investment? only a bit.and they could bite. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics & Politics, 12(1), 1–31.

  37. Hollweg, C., Smith, T., & Taglioni, D. (2017). Vietnam at a crossroads: Engaging in the next generation of global value chains. The World Bank, 10.1596/978‐1‐4648‐0996‐5.

  38. Hong, A. (2019). Vietnam becomes a winner in growing global electronics supply chain. (Hanoi. Times, 5, August. Available from http://hanoitimes.vn/vietnam‐becomes‐a‐winner‐in‐growing‐global‐electronics‐supply‐chain‐46268.html).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587–616.

  40. Jensen, N. M. (2006). Nation‐states and the multinational corporation : a political economy of foreign direct investment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Jensen, N., & McGillivray, F. (2005). Federal institutions and multinational investors: Federalism, government credibility, and foreign direct investment. International Interactions, 31(4), 303–325.

  42. Johns, L., & Wellhausen, R. L. (2016). Under one roof: Supply chains and the protection of Foreign investment. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541500057X.

  43. Johnson, L., Sachs, L. E., & Sachs, J. D. (2015). Investor‐state dispute settlement, public interest and us domestic law. (Report. Available from http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/05/Investor‐State‐Dispute‐Settlement‐Public‐Interest‐and‐U.S.‐Domestic‐Law‐FINAL‐May‐19‐8.pdf).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). Property rights and finance. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1335–1356.

  45. Kerner, A. (2009). Why should I believe you? The costs and consequences of bilateral investment treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 73–102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Laget, E., Osnago, A., Rocha, N., & Ruta, M. (2018). Deep trade agreements and global value chains. The World Bank.

  47. Lee, C.‐Y., & Johnston, N. P. (2016). may). Improving reputation BIT by BIT: Bilateral investment treaties and Foreign accountability. International Interactions, 42(3), 429–451.

  48. Lee, H., Biglaiser, G., & Staats, J. L. (2014). oct). The effects of political risk on different entry modes of foreign direct investment. International Interactions, 40(5), 683–710.

  49. Leubuscher, S. (2003). The privatisation of justice: International commercial arbitration and the redefinition of the state. The Socio‐Legal Dynamics of Disputes (Convenor: Linda Mulcahy). Mres Birkbeck College (www. fern.org/pubs/reports/dispute%, 20resolution% 20essay, pdf), 2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Li, Q. (2009). Outlier, measurement, and the democracy‐FDI controversy. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4(2), 167–181.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Li, Q., & Resnick, A. (2003). Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and Foreign direct investment to developing countries. International Organization, 57(1), 175–211.

  52. Lynch, K., & Lynch, K. L. (2003). The forces of economic globalization: Challenges to the regime of international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International BV.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Malesky, E. et al (2018). Pci 2018 the vietnam provincial competitiveness: Measuring economic governance for business development. Hanoi: VCCI and USAID.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Massman, O. (2019). Infrastructure criteria for sustainable development and rapid growth—how the cptpp and the euvn free trade agreement and investment protection agreement can contribute. Duane Morris Vietnam), (https://blogs.duanemorris.com/vietnam/tag/cptpp/f):.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Milberg, W., & Winkler, D. (2013). Outsourcing economics: Global value chains in capitalist development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Ministry of Justice (MOJ). (2018). List of arbitration centers in vietnam. (Available from http://bttp.moj.gov.vn/qt/Pages/trong‐tai‐tm.aspx.).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Mistelis, L. (2004). International arbitration‐corporate attitudes and practices‐12 perceptions tested: Myths, data and analysis research report. American Review of International Arbitration, 15, 525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Myburgh, A., & Paniagua, J. (2016). Does international commercial arbitration promote foreign direct investment? The Journal of Law and Economics, 59(3), 597–627.

  59. Nam, T., & Ho, A. (2015). Arbitration prospects and pitfalls in vietnam: Is it just the beginning. (Commercial Dispute Resolution News, 22, July. Available from https://www.cdr‐news.com/categories/arbitration‐and‐adr/5694‐abritration‐prospects‐and‐pitfalls‐in‐vietnam‐is‐it‐just‐the‐beginning).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Neumayer, E., & Spess, L. (2005). Do bilateral investment treaties increase Foreign direct investment to developing countries? World Development, 33(10), 1567–1585.

  61. Poulsen, L. N. S. (2010). The importance of BITs for Foreign direct investment and political risk insurance: Revisiting the evidence. Yearbook on international investment law and policy 2009/2010 (pp. 539–574). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Price, D. M. (2000). Chapter 11–private party vs. government, investor‐state dispute settlement: Frankenstein or safety valve. Canadian‐U.S. Law Journal, 26, 107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Puig, S. (2013). No right without a remedy: Foundations of investor‐state arbitration. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 35, 829.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Ríos‐Figueroa, J., & Staton, J. K. (2014). An evaluation of cross‐national measures of judicial independence. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 30(1), 104–137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Rogers, C. A., & Alford, R. P. (2009). The future of investment arbitration. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Rosendorff, B. P., & Shin, K. (2012). Importing transparency: The political economy of BITs and FDI Flows. (Working Paper. Available from, https://wp.nyu.edu/faculty‐rosendorff/wp‐content/uploads/sites/1510/2015/03/RosendorffShinAPSA2012.pdf).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Sperry, D. (2010a). The impact of international commercial arbitration on developing Nations: Has the emergence of the international private justice market narrowed the gap between developed and developing parties. Hong Kong LJ, 40, 361.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Sperry, D. (2010b). The impact of international commercial arbitration on developing nations: Has the emergence of the international private justice market narrowed the gap between developed and developing parties. Hong Kong LJ, 40, 361.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Staats, J. L., & Biglaiser, G. (2012). mar). Foreign direct investment in Latin America: The importance of judicial strength and rule of law. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 193–202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Tang, M.‐K., & Wei, S.‐J. (2009). The value of making commitments externally: Evidence from WTO accessions. Journal of International Economics, 78(2), 216–229.

  71. Thuy, B. (2018). Vbf 2018 urges vietnam to push home advantage. (Vietnam Investment Review, 12 December. Available from https://www.vir.com.vn/vbf‐2018‐urges‐vietnam‐to‐push‐home‐advantage‐64524.html).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Tobin, J. L., & Rose‐Ackerman, S. (2011). When BITs have some bite: The political‐economic environment for bilateral investment treaties. The Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 1–32.

  73. UNCTAD (2018). World investment report 2018: Investment and new industrial policies. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. (Available from https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2018 en.pdf).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. UNCTAD‐Eora. (2019). UNCTAD‐Eora., Global Value Chain Database. (Available from http://worldmrio.com/unctadgvc/).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Wellhausen, R. L. (2015). Investor–state dispute settlement: When can governments break contracts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(2), 239–261.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. White & Case, and Queen Mary University of London. (2018). 2018 international arbitration survey: The evolution of international arbitration. (Report. Available from https://www.whitecase.com/sites/whitecase/files/files/download/publications/qmul‐international‐arbitration‐survey‐2018‐18.pdf.).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  78. World Bank (2019). Doing business 2019: Training for reform (p. web‐version.pdf.).). Washington, DC: The World Bank. (Available from http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual‐Reports/English/DB2019‐reportweb-version.pdf.

  79. Yackee, J. W. (2008). Bilateral investment treaties, credible commitment, and the rule of (International) law: Do BITs promote Foreign direct investment? Law & Society Review, 42(4), 805–832.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Yackee, J. W. (2010). Do bilateral investment treaties promote foreign direct investment‐some hints from alternative evidence. Virginia Journal of International Law, 51, 397.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  81. Yu, J., & Walsh, M. J. P. (2010). Determinants of foreign direct investment: A sectoral and institutional approach, Vol. No. 10–187. International Monetary Fund.

  82. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The (Political) Economics of Bilateral Investment Treaties—The Unique Trajectory of Brazil. (2024). Bellak, Christian ; Leibrecht, Markus.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:130-:d:1401269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does the quality of bilateral investment treaties matter for outward foreign direct investment?. (2024). Urata, Shujiro ; Li, Shi ; Zhao, Long.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:91:y:2024:i:c:p:207-218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Investment policy reform as a driver of foreign direct investment: Evidence from China. (2023). Bellak, Christian ; Leibrecht, Markus.
    In: Economics of Transition and Institutional Change.
    RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:31:y:2023:i:4:p:1035-1053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The impact of unilateral BIT terminations on FDI: Quasi-experimental evidence from India. (2023). Spruk, Rok ; Hartmann, Simon.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:18:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11558-022-09471-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Impact of International Investment Agreements on Japanese FDI: A firm‐level analysis. (2023). Urata, Shujiro ; Baek, Youngmin.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:46:y:2023:i:8:p:2306-2334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do international investment agreements attract foreign direct investment in knowledge intensive industries?. (2023). Ozawa, Shunya.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:46:y:2023:i:7:p:2080-2101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. International investment agreements and foreign direct investment: A survey. (2023). Egger, Peter ; Titi, Catharine ; Pirotte, Alain.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:46:y:2023:i:6:p:1524-1565.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Impact of International Investment Agreements on Japanese FDI: A Firm-level Analysis. (2022). Urata, Shujiro ; Baek, Youngmin ; Youngmin, Baek.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:eti:dpaper:22038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Economic freedom and foreign direct investment: Are they related?. (2022). Degirmen, Suleyman ; Tag, Mehmet Nasih.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:73:y:2022:i:c:p:737-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. International Investment Agreements, Double-Taxation Treaties and Multinational Activity: The (Heterogeneous) Effects of Binding. (2021). Sztajerowska, Monika.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03265057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. International Investment Agreements, Double-Taxation Treaties and Multinational Activity: The (Heterogeneous) Effects of Binding. (2021). Sztajerowska, Monika.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-03265057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. International Investment Agreements Provisions and Foreign Direct Investment Flows in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Region. (2021). Uttama, Nathapornpan Piyaareekul.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:28-:d:509171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Judicial institutions of property rights protection and foreign direct investment inflows. (2021). Tag, Mehmet Nasih.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:65:y:2021:i:c:s0144818820301885.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Can foreign direct investment promote BIT signing?. (2021). Lu, Yue ; Liu, Pengcheng ; Ch, Khanindra ; Sheng, Bin.
    In: Journal of Asian Economics.
    RePEc:eee:asieco:v:75:y:2021:i:c:s1049007821000531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Fostering global value chains through international agreements: Evidence from Vietnam. (2021). Milner, Helen V ; Malesky, Edmund J.
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:443-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment in Africa. (2021). Beri, Parfait Bihkongnyuy ; Nubong, Gabila Fohtung.
    In: African Development Review.
    RePEc:bla:afrdev:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:439-451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Does Investor Protection Increase Foreign Direct Investment? A Meta-Analysis. (2020). Iwasaki, Ichiro ; DRABEK, Zdenek ; Brada, Josef.
    In: CEI Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hit:hitcei:2020-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Political Favoritism by Powerful Politicians: Evidence from Chief Ministers in India. (2020). Oak, Mandar ; Khalil, Umair ; Ponnusamy, Sundar.
    In: School of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:adl:wpaper:2020-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The International Trade effects of Bilateral Investment Treaties. (2020). Heid, Benedikt ; Vozzo, Isaac.
    In: School of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:adl:wpaper:2020-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Winning or losing in investor‐to‐state dispute resolution: The role of arbitrator bias and experience. (2018). Nunnenkamp, Peter ; Neumayer, Eric ; Donaubauer, Julian.
    In: Review of International Economics.
    RePEc:bla:reviec:v:26:y:2018:i:4:p:892-916.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment? The Role of International Dispute Settlement Provisions. (2017). Frenkel, Michael ; Walter, Benedikt.
    In: WHU Working Paper Series - Economics Group.
    RePEc:whu:wpaper:17-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Heterogeneous effects of bilateral investment treaties. (2017). Foster-McGregor, Neil ; Falvey, Rodney.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2017027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Heterogeneous effects of bilateral investment treaties. (2017). Foster-McGregor, Neil ; Falvey, Rodney.
    In: Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv).
    RePEc:spr:weltar:v:153:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10290-017-0287-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 09:03:04 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.