create a website

Lifting the veil on the correction of double counting incidents in hybrid life cycle assessment. (2020). Samson, Rejean ; Agez, Maxime ; Margni, Manuele ; Majeaubettez, Guillaume ; Stromman, Anders H.
In: Journal of Industrial Ecology.
RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:3:p:517-533.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 62

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects. (2025). Wang, R ; Tukker, A ; Heijungs, R ; Hagenaars, R H.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125001169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A or I‐A? Unifying the computational structures of process‐ and IO‐based LCA for clarity and consistency. (2022). Yang, YI ; Heijungs, Reinout ; Park, Hungsuck.
    In: Journal of Industrial Ecology.
    RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:5:p:1824-1836.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How do carbon footprints from LCA and EEIOA databases compare? A comparison of ecoinvent and EXIOBASE. (2022). Merciai, Stefano ; Steubing, Bernhard ; Tukker, Arnold ; de Koning, Arjan.
    In: Journal of Industrial Ecology.
    RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:4:p:1406-1422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Adjustment of the Life Cycle Inventory in Life Cycle Assessment for the Flexible Integration into Energy Systems Analysis. (2020). Betten, Thomas ; Shammugam, Shivenes ; Graf, Roberta.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4437-:d:405061.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Acquaye, A. A., Wiedmann, T., Feng, K., Crawford, R. H., Barrett, J., Kuylenstierna, J., … McQueen‐Mason, S. (2011). Identification of “Carbon Hot‐Spots” and quantification of GHG intensities in the biodiesel supply chain using hybrid LCA and structural path analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(6), 2471–2478. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103410q.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Andrew, R. M., & Peters, G. P. (2013). A multi‐region input–output table based on the global trade analysis project database (GTAP‐MRIO). Economic Systems Research, 25, 99–121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Arvesen, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2011). Environmental Implications of large‐scale adoption of wind power: A scenario‐based life cycle assessment. Environ. Res. Lett., 6(4), 045102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Arvesen, A., Birkeland, C., & Hertwich, E. G. (2013). The importance of ships and spare parts in LCAs of offshore wind power. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(6), 2948–2956. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304509r.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bullard, C. W., & Penner, P. S. (1978). Net energy analysis: Handbook for combining process and input–output analysis. Resources Energy, 1(3), 267–313.

  6. Crawford, R. H., Bontinck, P.‐A., Stephan, A., Wiedmann, T., & Yu, M. (2018). Hybrid life cycle inventory methods—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1273–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.176.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Defourny, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal, 94(373), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232220.

  8. Deng, L., Babbitt, C. W., & Williams, E. D. (2011). Economic‐balance hybrid LCA extended with uncertainty analysis: Case study of a laptop computer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development, United Nations, & World Bank. (2009). System of national accounts (Vol. 2008). New York: United Nations.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Fernández‐Dacosta, C., Van Der Spek, M., Hung, C. R., Oregionni, G. D., Skagestad, R., Parihar, P., … Ramirez, A. (2017). Prospective techno‐economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture at a refinery and CO2 utilisation in polyol synthesis. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 21, 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.08.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Ferrao, P., & Nhambiu, J. (2009). A comparison between conventional LCA and hybrid EIO‐LCA: Analyzing crystal giftware contribution to global warming potential. In Handbook of input–output economics in industrial ecology (pp. 219–230). New York: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Gallego, B., & Lenzen, M. (2005). A consistent input–output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. Economic Systems Research, 17(4), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310500283492.

  13. Gibon, T., & Schaubroeck, T. (2017). Lifting the fog on characteristics and limitations of hybrid LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(6), 1005–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1291-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Gibon, T., Wood, R., Arvesen, A., Bergesen, J. D., Suh, S., & Hertwich, E. G. (2015). A methodology for integrated, multiregional life cycle assessment scenarios under large‐scale technological change. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(18), 11218–11226. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01558.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Heijungs, R., & Suh, S. (2002). The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. International Organization for Standardization. (2006). ISO 14040—Environmental management— life cycle assessment‐principles and framework.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Jeswani, H. K., Azapagic, A., Schepelmann, P., & Ritthoff, M. (2010). Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Joshi, S. (1999). Product environmental life‐cycle assessment using input–output techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3, 95–120.

  19. Junnila, S. I. (2006). Empirical comparison of process and economic input–output life cycle assessment in service industries. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(22), 7070–7076.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Lenzen, M. (2000). Errors in conventional and input–output—based life cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1162/10881980052541981.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Lenzen, M. (2009). Dealing with double‐counting in tiered hybrid life‐cycle inventories: A few comments‐response. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(17), 1607–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.06.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Lenzen, M., & Crawford, R. (2009). The path exchange method for hybrid LCA. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(21), 8251–8256. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902090z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Lenzen, M., & Dey, C. (2000). Truncation error in embodied energy analyses of basic iron and steel products. Energy, 25(6), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00088-2.

  24. Lenzen, M., & Treloar, G. (2003). Differential convergence of life‐cycle inventories toward upstream production layers. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6(3), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819802766269575.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2013). Building Eora: A global multi‐region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25, 20–49.

  26. Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927837.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Leontief, W. (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic strcture: An input–output approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 262–271.

  28. Lin, J., Liu, Y., Meng, F., Cui, S., & Xu, L. (2013). Using hybrid method to evaluate carbon footprint of Xiamen City, China. Energy Policy, 58, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.007.

  29. Majeau‐Bettez, G., & Maxime, D. (2015). The input output method and its use in LCA. Retrieved from https://www.scorelca.org/espace_mb/etudes/SCORE-2014-04-synthang-34p2n31u8e-14.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Majeau‐Bettez, G., Agez, M., Wood, R., Södersten, C., Margni, M., Strømman, A. H., & Samson, R. (2017). Streamlined Hybridization software: Merging Ecoinvent and Exiobase. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Society for Industrial Ecology, Chicago, IL.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input–output analysis. Foundations and extensions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Mongelli, I., Suh, S., & Huppes, G. (2005). A structure comparison of two approaches to LCA inventory data, based on the MIET and ETH databases. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10(5), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.12.198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Moskowitz, P. D., & Rowe, M. D. (1985). A comparison of input–output and process analysis. In P. F. Ricci & M. D. Rowe (Eds.), Health and Environmental Risk Assessment (pp. 281–293). New York: Pergamon Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Nakamura, S., & Kondo, Y. (2002). Input–output analysis of waste management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819802320971632.

  35. Norris, G. A. (2002). Life cycle emission distributions within the economy: Implications for life cycle impact assessment. Risk Analysis, 22(5), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00261.

  36. Perkins, J., & Suh, S. (2019). Uncertainty implications of hybrid approach in LCA: Precision versus accuracy. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(7), 3681–3688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00084.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Pomponi, F., & Lenzen, M. (2017). Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) does not necessarily yield more accurate results than process‐based LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Price, L., & Kendall, A. (2012). Wind power as a case study: Improving life cycle assessment reporting to better enable meta‐analyses. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, S22–S27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00458.x.

  39. Rowley, H. V., Lundie, S., & Peters, G. M. (2009). A hybrid life cycle assessment model for comparison with conventional methodologies in Australia. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14(6), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0093-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Stadler, K., Wood, R., Bulavskaya, T., Södersten, C. J., Simas, M., Schmidt, S., … Tukker, A. (2018). EXIOBASE 3: Developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi‐regional input–output tables. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(3), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12715.

  41. Stephan, A., Crawford, R. H., & Bontinck, P.‐A. (2018). A model for streamlining and automating path exchange hybrid life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1521-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Strømman, A. H. (2009). Dealing with double‐counting in tiered hybrid life‐cycle inventories: A few comments‐response. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(17), 1607–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.06.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Strømman, A. H., & Solli, C. (2008). Applying Leontief's price model to estimate missing elements in hybrid life cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00011.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Strømman, A. H., Peters, G. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2009). Approaches to correct for double counting in tiered hybrid life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.05.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Strømman, A. H., Solli, C., & Hertwich, E. G. (2006). Hybrid life‐cycle assessment of natural gas based fuel chains for transportation. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(8), 2797–2804. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0511523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Suh, S. (2004). Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological–economic model. Ecological Economics, 59(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.013.

  47. Suh, S. (2009). Developing the sectoral environmental database for input–output analysis: Comprehensive environmental data archive of the U.S. In Handbook of input–output economics in industrial ecology (pp. 689–712). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Suh, S., & Huppes, G. (2005). Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Suh, S., & Lippiatt, B. C. (2012). Framework for hybrid life cycle inventory databases: A case study on the Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability ( BEES) database. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(5), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0393-z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., … Norris, G. (2004). System boundary selection in life‐cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environmental Science and Technology, 38(3), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0263745.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Szyrmer, J. M. (1992). Input–output coefficients and multipliers from a total‐flow perspective. Environment and Planning A, 24, 921–937.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Tukker, A., & Dietzenbacher, E. (2013). Global multiregional input output frameworks: An introduction and outlook. Economic Systems Research, 25, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761179.

  53. Ward, H., Wenz, L., Steckel, J. C., & Minx, J. C. (2017). Truncation error estimates in process life cycle assessment using input–output analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(5), 1080–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12655.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Weidema, B. (2011). Stepping stones from life cycle assessment to adjacent assessment techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(5), 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00385.x.

  55. Weidema, B., Bauer, C., Hischier, R., Mutel, C., Nemecek, T., Reinhard, J., … Wernet, G. (2013). Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Retrieved from http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/methodology-of-ecoinvent-3/methodology-of-ecoinvent-3.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno‐Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Wiedmann, T. O., Suh, S., Feng, K., Lenzen, M., Acquaye, A., Scott, K., & Barrett, J. R. (2011). Application of hybrid life cycle approaches to emerging energy technologies: The case of wind power in the UK. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(13), 5900–5907. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2007287.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Williams, E. D. (2004). Energy intensity of computer manufacturing: Hybrid assessment combining process and economic input–output methods. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(22), 6166–6174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Wood, R., Stadler, K., Bulavskaya, T., Lutter, S., Giljum, S., de Koning, A., … Tukker, A. (2015). Global sustainability accounting‐developing EXIOBASE for multi‐regional footprint analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(1), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Yang, Y., Heijungs, R., & Brandão, M. (2017). Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) does not necessarily yield more accurate results than process‐based LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Yang, Y., Ingwersen, W. W., Hawkins, T. R., Srocka, M., & Meyer, D. E. (2017). USEEIO: A new and transparent United States environmentally‐extended input–output model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Yu, M., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Implementing hybrid LCA routines in an input–output virtual laboratory. Journal of Economic Structures, 7, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-018-0131-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Is solar power renewable and carbon-neutral: Evidence from a pilot solar tower plant in China under a systems view. (2021). Wu, Xudong ; Zhang, Lixiao ; Shao, Ling ; Meng, Jing ; Chen, Guoqian ; Li, Chaohui.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:138:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120309394.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The multi-factor energy input–output model. (2017). Domingos, Tiago ; Guevara, Zeus.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:261-269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Carbon Footprint of Inbound Tourism to Iceland: A Consumption-Based Life-Cycle Assessment including Direct and Indirect Emissions. (2016). Heinonen, Jukka ; Grundius, Josefine ; Sharp, Hannah .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1147-:d:82402.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Renewability assessment of a production system: Based on embodied energy as emergy. (2016). Shao, Ling ; Chen, G Q.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:380-392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A comprehensive assessment of the energy performance of the full range of electricity generation technologies deployed in the United Kingdom. (2016). Raugei, Marco ; Leccisi, Enrica.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:90:y:2016:i:c:p:46-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. LCA Methodologies an Annotated Bibliography. (2015). Zhao, Xueting.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:rri:wpaper:2015rd03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 2: Total Economy Expenditure Perspective. (2015). Maxwell, John P ; King, Carey W ; Donovan, Alyssa .
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:11:p:12347-12996:d:58938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective. (2015). Maxwell, John P ; King, Carey W ; Donovan, Alyssa .
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:11:p:12346-12974:d:58937.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment of Low, Mid and High-Rise Multi-Family Dwellings. (2015). Bawden, Kimberly ; Williams, Eric.
    In: Challenges.
    RePEc:gam:jchals:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:98-116:d:49007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Net energy analysis in a Ramsey–Hotelling growth model. (2015). Matilla-García, Mariano ; Matilla-Garcia, Mariano ; Macias, Arturo.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:562-573.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods. (2015). Tramberend, Sylvia ; Giljum, Stefan ; Bruckner, Martin ; Fischer, Gunther.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:114:y:2015:i:c:p:11-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Carbon emissions by rural energy in China. (2014). Zhang, L. X. ; Wang, C. B. ; Bahaj, A. S..
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:641-649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Matrix method for comparing system and individual energy return ratios when considering an energy transition. (2014). King, Carey W..
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p:254-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The carbon payback of micro-generation: An integrated hybrid input–output approach. (2014). Bush, Ruth ; Scott, Kate ; Barrett, John ; Jacques, David A..
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:119:y:2014:i:c:p:85-98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Time Series EROI for Canadian Oil and Gas. (2013). Charles A. S. Hall, ; Poisson, Alexandre .
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:11:p:5940-5959:d:30491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Life-cycle energy of residential buildings in China. (2013). Chang, Yuan ; Wang, Yaowu ; Ries, Robert J..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:62:y:2013:i:c:p:656-664.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. A Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Nonrenewable Energy and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of a Village-Level Biomass Gasification Project in China. (2012). Yang, Shuying ; Pang, Mingyue ; Zhang, Lixiao ; Wang, Changbo.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:8:p:2708-2723:d:19099.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Environmental tax on products and services based on their carbon footprint: A case study of the pulp and paper sector. (2012). Llop, Maria ; Butnar, I. ; Castells, F. ; Gemechu, E. D..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:50:y:2012:i:c:p:336-344.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an Irish city-region. (2012). Moles, Richard ; Browne, David ; O'Regan, Bernadette .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:83:y:2012:i:c:p:97-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. System Energy Assessment (SEA), Defining a Standard Measure of EROI for Energy Businesses as Whole Systems. (2011). Zarnikau, Jay ; Henshaw, Philip F. ; King, Carey .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:10:p:1908-1943:d:14373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Relating Financial and Energy Return on Investment. (2011). Charles A. S. Hall, ; King, Carey W..
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:10:p:1810-1832:d:14304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A General Mathematical Framework for Calculating Systems-Scale Efficiency of Energy Extraction and Conversion: Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Other Energy Return Ratios. (2011). Dale, Michael ; Brandt, Adam R..
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:4:y:2011:i:8:p:1211-1245:d:13623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the generation of wind and hydro power. (2011). Hanssen, Ole Jorgen ; Gagnon, Luc ; Modahl, Ingunn Saur ; Raadal, Hanne Lerche .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:7:p:3417-3422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A comprehensive life cycle analysis of cofiring algae in a coal power plant as a solution for achieving sustainable energy. (2011). Tatari, Omer ; Kucukvar, Murat.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:11:p:6352-6357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis. (2011). Palm, Viveka ; Wiedmann, Thomas ; Lutter, Stephan ; Lenzen, Manfred ; Wilting, Harry C..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:11:p:1937-1945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Indirect energy input of agricultural machinery in bioenergy production. (2010). Ahokas, Jukka ; Mikkola, Hannu J..
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:35:y:2010:i:1:p:23-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems. (2010). Endres, Peter K. ; Kubiszewski, Ida ; Cleveland, Cutler J..
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:35:y:2010:i:1:p:218-225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Life cycle water use of low-carbon transport fuels. (2010). Meyers, Robert ; Williams, Eric ; Harto, Christopher .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:9:p:4933-4944.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Energy embodied in the international trade of China: An energy input-output analysis. (2010). Li, Xia ; Xi, Youmin, ; Liu, Hongtao ; Guo, Ju'e, .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:8:p:3957-3964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield. (2009). Crawford, R. H..
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:13:y:2009:i:9:p:2653-2660.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. CO2 emissions structure of Indian economy. (2009). Ganesh-Kumar, Anand ; Singh, Vinay ; Panda, Manoj ; Parikh, Jyoti.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:34:y:2009:i:8:p:1024-1031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region. (2009). Moles, Richard ; Browne, David ; O'Regan, Bernadette .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:6:p:2205-2213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Greenhouse gas emissions in the nuclear life cycle: A balanced appraisal. (2009). D'Haeseleer, William ; Beerten, Jef ; Meskens, Gaston ; Laes, Erik.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:12:p:5056-5068.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Does product lifetime extension increase our income at the expense of energy consumption?. (2009). Kagawa, Shigemi ; Kudoh, Yuki ; Nansai, Keisuke.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:197-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Life-cycle energy analysis of building integrated photovoltaic systems (BiPVs) with heat recovery unit. (2006). Fuller, R. J. ; Crawford, R. H. ; Bazilian, M. ; Treloar, G. J..
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:10:y:2006:i:6:p:559-575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. New approaches for household energy conservation--In search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. (2006). Kok, Rixt ; Noorman, Klaas Jan ; Moll, Henri C. ; Wiersma, Gerwin ; Benders, Rene M. J., .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:34:y:2006:i:18:p:3612-3622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input-output energy analysis: A comparison of methods and a discussion of results. (2006). Kok, Rixt ; Moll, Henri C. ; Benders, Rene M. J., .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:34:y:2006:i:17:p:2744-2761.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Analysis of changing hidden energy flow in Vietnam. (2006). Thi Anh Tuyet, Nguyen, ; Ishihara, Keiichi N..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:34:y:2006:i:14:p:1883-1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. “Green” consumption—no solution for climate change. (2004). Alfredsson, E. C..
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:4:p:513-524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model. (2004). Suh, Sangwon.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:48:y:2004:i:4:p:451-467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Wind turbines in Brazil and Germany: an example of geographical variability in life-cycle assessment. (2004). Wachsmann, Ulrike ; Lenzen, Manfred.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:77:y:2004:i:2:p:119-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications. (2002). Munksgaard, Jesper ; Lenzen, Manfred.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:339-362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Embodied energy in buildings: wood versus concrete--reply to Borjesson and Gustavsson. (2002). Lenzen, M. ; Treloar, G..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:30:y:2002:i:3:p:249-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia. (2001). Lenzen, Manfred.
    In: Economic Systems Research.
    RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:13:y:2001:i:1:p:65-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Thermodynamics extends economics potentials. (2001). Brodiansky, Victor M. ; Bandura, Alexander V.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:26:y:2001:i:8:p:811-814.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Truncation error in embodied energy analyses of basic iron and steel products. (2000). Lenzen, Manfred ; Dey, Christopher.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:25:y:2000:i:6:p:577-585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Limits to the value of external costs. (1997). Stirling, Andrew.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:25:y:1997:i:5:p:517-540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: A neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics. (1997). Stern, David.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:21:y:1997:i:3:p:197-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Input-output analysis: Input of energy, CO2, and work to produce goods. (1996). Born, Peter.
    In: Journal of Policy Modeling.
    RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:18:y:1996:i:2:p:217-221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: a comparative view. (1996). Herendeen, R. A. ; Brown, M. T..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:19:y:1996:i:3:p:219-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 19:39:46 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.