create a website

Buyers role in innovation procurement: Evidence from US military R&D contracts. (2021). Raiteri, Emilio ; Iossa, Elisabetta ; Giuffrida, Leonardo M. ; Decarolis, Francesco ; de Rassenfosse, Gaétan ; Mollisi, Vincenzo ; Spagnolo, Giancarlo.
In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:697-720.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 13

Citations received by this document

Cites: 65

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Using Multiple Tools to Enhance Competition in Public Procurement. (2025). Iossa, Elisabetta ; Catenazzo, Alessandra ; Calini, Clara.
    In: CEIS Research Paper.
    RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:594.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand?. (2025). Chiappinelli, Olga ; Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Giuffrida, Leonardo M.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0167718725000244.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. AI Governance through Markets. (2025). Franklin, Matija ; Jain, Rupal ; Tomei, Philip Moreira.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2501.17755.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials. (2024). Tukiainen, Janne ; Sieppi, Antti ; Luukinen, Ari ; Jskelinen, Jan ; Giuffrida, Leonardo M ; Bohne, Albrecht ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:227:y:2024:i:c:s0167268124003305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Targeted Bidders in Government Tenders. (2024). Cappelletti, Matilde ; Giuffrida, Leonardo M.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand?. (2023). Giuffrida, Leonardo M. ; Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Chiappinelli, Olga.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:23002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Indirect Savings from Public Procurement Centralization. (2023). Valletti, Tommaso ; Lotti, Clarissa ; Muo, Arieda ; Spagnolo, Giancarlo.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:c678u_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Indirect Savings from Public Procurement Centralization. (2023). Valletti, Tommaso ; Muco, Arieda ; Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Lotti, Clarissa ; Muo, Arieda.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:c678u.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence from Conjoint Experiments with Procurement Officials. (2023). Tukiainen, Janne ; Giuffrida, Leonardo M. ; Jaaskelainen, Jan ; Luukinen, Ari ; Sieppi, Antti ; Bohne, Albrecht ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Targeted bidders in government tenders. (2022). Giuffrida, Leonardo M. ; Cappelletti, Matilde.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:22030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Indirect Savings from Public Procurement Centralization. (2022). Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Lotti, Clarissa.
    In: CEIS Research Paper.
    RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Supplier selection and contract enforcement: Evidence from performance bonding. (2022). Rovigatti, Gabriele ; Giuffrida, Leonardo M..
    In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
    RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:980-1019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Buyers workload and R&D procurement outcomes: Evidence from the US Air Force Research Lab. (2021). Raiteri, Emilio ; Giuffrida, Leonardo Maria.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251–259.

  2. Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand: Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38(8), 1235–1247.

  3. Azoulay, P., Li, D., GraffZivin, J. S., & Sampat, B. N. (2018). Public R&D investments and private‐sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 117–152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Bajari, P., & Tadelis, S. (2001). Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387–407.

  5. Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2009). Active and passive waste in government spending: Evidence from a policy experiment. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1278–1308.

  6. Bellégo, C., & Pape, L. (2019). Dealing with the log of zero in regression models (Working Paper). Available at: SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3444996.

  7. Bessen, J. (2008). The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932–945.

  8. Best, M. C., Hjort, J., & Szakonyi, D. (2017). Individuals and organizations as sources of state effectiveness (NBER Working Paper 23350). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  9. Bhattacharya, V. (2018). An empirical model of R&D procurement contests: An analysis of the DOD SBIR program (working paper). Evanston: Northwestern University.

  10. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351–1408.

  11. Bruce, J. R., de Figueiredo, J. M., & Silverman, B. S. (2019). Public contracting for private innovation: Government capabilities, decision rights, and performance outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 533–555.

  12. Bucciol, A., Camboni, R., & Valbonesi, P. (2020). Purchasing medical devices: The role of buyer competence and discretion. Journal of Health Economics, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102370.

  13. Cabral, L. M. B., Cozzi, G., Denicoló, V., Spagnolo, G., & Zanza, M. (2006). Procuring innovation (CEPR Discussion Papers 5774). London, UK: CEPR.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Carril, R., & Duggan, M. (2018). The impact of industry consolidation on government procurement: Evidence from Department of Defense Contracting (NBER Working Paper 25160). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  15. Carril, R., & Duggan, M. (2020). The impact of industry consolidation on government procurement: Evidence from Department of Defense contracting. Journal of Public Economics, 184, 104–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104141.

  16. Che, Y. K., Iossa, E., & Rey, P. (2021). Prizes versus contracts as incentives for innovation. The Review of Economic Studies. Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa092.

  17. Clemens, J., & Rogers, P. (2020). Demand shocks, procurement policies, and the nature of medical innovation: Evidence from wartime prosthetic device patents (Working Paper 26679). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  18. Corredoira, R. A., Goldfarb, B. D., & Shi, Y. (2018). Federal funding and the rate and direction of inventive activity. Research Policy, 47(9), 1777–1800.

  19. Cozzi, G., & Impullitti, G. (2010). Government spending composition, technical change, and wage inequality. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(6), 1325–1358.

  20. Decarolis, F., Giuffrida, L. M., Iossa, E., Mollisi, V., & Spagnolo, G. (2021). Bureaucratic competence and procurement outcomes. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 36(3), 537–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaa004.

  21. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score‐matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. European Commission. (2020). ProcurCompEU‐European competency framework for public procurement professionals (Technical report). Directorate‐General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Flamm, K. (1987). Targeting the computer: Government support and international competition. The Brookings Institution.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. GAO. (2017). Adopting best practices can improve innovation investments and management (Technical report, GAO‐17‐499). US Government Accountability Office.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. GAO. (2019a). Dod should comprehensively assess how its policies affect the defense industry. Technical report, GAO‐19‐406, US Government Accountability Office.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. GAO. (2019b). Information on workforce, organizational structure, and budgeting for selected programs (Technical report, GAO‐19‐209). US Government Accountability Office.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Gavrilov, L. A., & Gavrilova, N. S. (2011). Mortality measurement at advanced ages: A study of the social security administration death master file. North American Actuarial Journal, 3, 432–447.

  28. Giuffrida, L. M., & Rovigatti, G. (2018). Can the private sector ensure the public interest? Evidence from Federal procurement (ZEW Discussion Paper No. 18‐045). Mannheim: ZEW—Centre for European Economic Research.

  29. Gross, D. P. (2019). The consequences of invention secrecy: Evidence from the USPTO patent secrecy program in World War II. National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Guerzoni, M., & Raiteri, E. (2015). Demand‐side vs. supply‐side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, 44(3), 726–747.

  31. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363.

  32. Howell, S. T. (2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136–1164.

  33. Jäger, S. (2017). How substitutable are workers? Evidence from worker deaths (working paper). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Kang, K., & Miller, R. A. (2017). Winning by default: Why is there so little competition in government procurement? (working paper). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

  35. Klein, H. J., & Polin, B. (2012). Are organizations on board with best practices onboarding. In C. Wanberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (Vol. 54, pp. 267–287). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114, 441–465.

  37. Lee, S. H. (1997). Protecting the private inventor under the peacetime provisions of the invention secrecy act. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12, 345.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Li, D., Azoulay, P., & Sampat, B. N. (2017). The applied value of public investments in biomedical research. Science, 356(6333), 78–81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Liebman, J. B., & Mahoney, N. (2017). Do expiring budgets lead to wasteful year‐end spending? Evidence from Federal procurement. American Economic Review, 107(11), 3510–49.

  40. Liebreich, M. (2018). Why Mariana Mazzucato is wrong about the ‘entrepreneurial state’. https://unherd.com/2018/06/mariana-mazzucato-wrong-entrepreneurial-state/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Limodio, N. (2021). Bureaucrat allocation in the public sector: Evidence from the World Bank. The Economic Journal. Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab008.

  42. Maurer, S. M., & Scotchmer, S. (2004). Procuring knowledge. In G. D. Libecap (Ed.), Intellectual property and entrepreneurship (Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth (Vol. 15, pp. 1–31). Emerald Publishing Limited.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private myths in risk and innovation. Anthem Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. McEwen, J., Bloch, D., & Gray, R. (2012). Intellectual property in government contracts: Protecting and enforcing IP at the state and federal level. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S., & Lemley, M. A. (2003). Intellectual property in the new technological age: 2003. Aspen Publishers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Mingardi, A. (2015). A critique of Mazzucatoas entrepreneurial State. Cato Journal, 35(3), 603–625.

  47. Nelson, R. R. (1982). Government and Technical Progress: A cross‐industry analysis. Pergamon Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Nelson, R. R., & Langlois, R. N. (1983). Industrial innovation policy: Lessons from American history. Science, 219(4586), 814–818.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. OECD. (2017). Public procurement for innovation: Good practices and strategies. OECD Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Raiteri, E. (2018). A time to nourish? Evaluating the impact of public procurement on technological generality through patent data. Research Policy, 47(5), 936–952.

  51. Rasul, I., & Rogger, D. (2016). Management of bureaucrats and public service delivery: Evidence from the Nigerian Civil Service. The Economic Journal, 128(608), 413–446.

  52. Rendon, R., Apte, U., & Apte, A. (2012). Services acquisition in the dod: A comparison of management practices in the army, navy, and air force. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 19. https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/38776.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Rubin, D. (1980). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Biometrics, 36(2), 293–298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. SantosSilva, J., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. SantosSilva, J., & Tenreyro, S. (2010). On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression. Economics Letters, 107(2), 310–312.

  57. Saussier, S., & Tirole, J. (2015). Strengthening the efficiency of public procurement. Note du conseil danalyse economique, 22(3), 1–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Slavtchev, V., & Wiederhold, S. (2016). Does the technological content of government demand matter for private R&D? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 8(2), 45–84.

  59. Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., & Toivanen, O. (2013a). Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 255–272.

  60. Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., & Toivanen, O. (2013b). Market failures and the additionality effects of public support to private R&D: Theory and empirical implications. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5), 634–642.

  61. Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., & Toivanen, O. (2017). Welfare effects of R&D support policies. Mimeo.

  62. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.

  63. USPTO. (2019). Manual of patent examining procedure. US Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Warren, P. L. (2014). Contracting officer workload, incomplete contracting, and contractual terms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 45(2), 395–421.

  65. Westlake, S. (2014, November 11). Interrogating the entrepreneurial state. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2014/nov/11/interrogating-the-entrepreneurial-state-innovation-policy.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Offshore versus domestic: Can EM MNCs reach higher R&D quality abroad?. (2017). Schaefer, Kerstin J ; Liefner, Ingo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2533-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices. (2016). Jaffe, Adam ; de Rassenfosse, Gaétan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21868.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. (2015). Motohashi, Kazuyuki ; Dang, Jianwei.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:35:y:2015:i:c:p:137-155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Credit supply and corporate innovation. (2013). Zaldokas, Alminas ; Schneider, Cédric ; Amore, Mario.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:109:y:2013:i:3:p:835-855.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Quantity or quality? Collaboration strategies in research and development and incentives to patent. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:12047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The globalization of technology in emerging markets: a gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. (2012). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series.
    RePEc:uto:labeco:201208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Quantity or Quality? Collaboration Strategies in Research and Development and Incentives to Patent. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO ; Hanna, Hottenrott.
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2012-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Inventive, the Educated, and the Creative: How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?. (2012). Mellander, Charlotta ; Stolarick, Kevin ; Lobo, Jose ; Strumsky, Deborah.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation.
    RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0263.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Academic patent value and knowledge transfer in the UK: Does patent ownership matter?. (2012). sterzi, valerio.
    In: Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019).
    RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2012-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The globalization of technology in emerging markets: a gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. (2012). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019).
    RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2012-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. (2011). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Bento, Cindy Lopes .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:11053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Wacky patents meet economic indicators. (2011). Schneider, Cédric ; Hussinger, Katrin ; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:11044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Inventing together: exploring the nature of international knowledge spillovers in Latin America. (2011). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
    RePEc:spr:joevec:v:21:y:2011:i:1:p:53-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Academic patent value and knowledge transfer in the UK. Does patent ownership matter?. (2011). sterzi, valerio.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34955.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The battle for patent rights in plant biotechnology: evidence from opposition fillings. (2011). Schneider, Cédric.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:565-579.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. (2011). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO ; Dirk, CZARNITZKI .
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2011-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. (2011). Oettl, Alexander ; McHale, John ; Agrawal, Ajay ; Kapur, Devesh.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:69:y:2011:i:1:p:43-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. “Wacky” patents meet economic indicators. (2011). Schneider, Cédric ; Hussinger, Katrin ; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:113:y:2011:i:2:p:131-134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Licensing in the Patent Thicket - Timing and Benefits. (2010). von Graevenitz, Georg ; Siebert, Ralph.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:24007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Communities, Knowledge, and Innovation: Indian Immigrants in the US Semiconductor Industry. (2010). Li, Sali ; Almeida, Paul ; Phene, Anupama.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pil:wpaper:58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The technological origins of radical inventions. (2010). Duysters, Geert ; Schoenmakers, Wilfred .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:8:p:1051-1059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Not Invented Here? Innovation in company towns. (2010). Cockburn, Iain ; Agrawal, Ajay ; Rosell, Carlos.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:67:y:2010:i:1:p:78-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Temporal and spatial relations between patents and scientific journal articles: the case of nanotechnologies. (2010). Finardi, Ugo ; Ugo, Finardi .
    In: CERIS Working Paper.
    RePEc:csc:cerisp:201007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Why are some independent inventors heroes and others hobbyists? The moderating role of technological diversity and specialization. (2009). Rost, Katja ; von Wartburg, Iwan ; Lettl, Christopher.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:2:p:243-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Do liberal market economies really innovate more radically than coordinated market economies?: Hall and Soskice reconsidered. (2009). Los, Bart ; Castaldi, Carolina ; Akkermans, Dirk .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:1:p:181-191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Inventing Together: Exploring the Nature of International Knowledge Spillovers in Latin America. (2008). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Patents only live twice: a patent survival analysis in Europe. (2007). van Zeebroeck, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers CEB.
    RePEc:sol:wpaper:07-028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The puzzle of patent value indicators. (2007). van Zeebroeck, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers CEB.
    RePEc:sol:wpaper:07-023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development. (2007). Haupt, Reinhard ; Kloyer, Martin ; Lange, Marcus.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:36:y:2007:i:3:p:387-398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation. (2007). Subramanian, Krishnamurthy ; Acharya, Viral.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Identifying the Age Profile of Patent Citations. (2007). Rysman, Marc ; Yabu, Tomoyoshi.
    In: Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2007-021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. How Licensing Resolves Hold-Up: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity. (2006). von Graevenitz, Georg ; Siebert, Ralph.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems.
    RePEc:trf:wpaper:105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Patent citations indicating present value of the biotechnology business. (2006). Nikulainen, Tuomo ; Hermans, Raine ; Kulvik, Martti.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rif:dpaper:1048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. How Licensing Resolves Hold-Up: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity. (2006). von Graevenitz, Georg ; Siebert, Ralph.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5436.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness. (2005). Dahlin, Kristina B. ; Behrens, Dean M..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:5:p:717-737.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. (2005). Rost, Katja ; Teichert, Thorsten ; von Wartburg, Iwan .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:10:p:1591-1607.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Patente als Sicherheiten bei der Kreditvergabe. (2005). Mussler, Sven ; Himmel, Holger ; Schedl, Hans ; von Scheffer, Guido ; Loop, Dirk .
    In: ifo Schnelldienst.
    RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:58:y:2005:i:07:p:21-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: an application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. (2004). Flor, M. L. ; Oltra, M. J..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:33:y:2004:i:2:p:323-336.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?. (2004). Richardson, Vernon J. ; Hirschey, Mark.
    In: Journal of Empirical Finance.
    RePEc:eee:empfin:v:11:y:2004:i:1:p:91-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?. (2003). Hagedoorn, John ; Cloodt, Myriam.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:32:y:2003:i:8:p:1365-1379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. (2003). Almeida, Paul ; Phene, Anupama.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:349-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. (2002). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Development and Comp Systems.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0201001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Technological Innovation in Telecommunications: An Empirical Analysis of Specialisation Paths. (2002). Sgobbi, Francesca ; Mariotti, Sergio ; Garrone, Paola.
    In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
    RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:11:y:2002:i:1:p:1-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. (2001). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Development and Comp Systems.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0012002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. (2001). Sorenson, Olav ; Fleming, Lee.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:30:y:2001:i:7:p:1019-1039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. (2001). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt8vh1c20f.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Modelo para datos de recuentro de corte transversal con exceso de ceros. Aplicación a citas patentes. (2001). Fernandez, Victor Cano ; Padron, Miguel Sanchez ; Margarita E. Romero Rodriguez, ; Arcos, Enrique Los.
    In: Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC.
    RePEc:can:series:2001-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look.. (2000). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:ucb:calbwp:e00-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Industrial research as a source of important patents. (1998). Ernst, Holger.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:27:y:1998:i:1:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: the Italian experience. (1996). Santarelli, Enrico ; Piergiovanni, Roberta.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:25:y:1996:i:5:p:689-711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 14:08:51 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.