- Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Allen, T., & Henn, G. (2007). The organization and architecture of innovation. Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330.
Biancani, S., Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A., & Smith, S. (2018). Superstars in the making? The broad effects of interdisciplinary centers. Research Policy, 47(3), 543–557.
Biancani, S., McFarland, D. A., & Dahlander, L. (2014). The semiformal organization. Organization Science, 25(5), 1306–1324.
Birnholtz, J. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239.
Birnholtz, J., Guha, S., Yuan, Y. C., Gay, G., & Heller, C. (2013). Cross‐campus collaboration: A scientometric and network case study of publication activity across two campuses of a single institution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 162–172.
Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2011). Robust inference with multiway clustering. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(2), 238–249.
Catalini, C. (2018). Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Science, 64(9), 4348–4364.
Chung, E., Kwon, N., & Lee, J. (2016). Understanding scientific collaboration in the research life cycle: Bio‐ and nanoscientists motivations, information‐sharing and communication practices, and barriers to collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1836–1848.
Claudel, M., Massaro, E., Santi, P., Murray, F., & Ratti, C. (2017). An exploration of collaborative scientific production at MIT through spatial organization and institutional affiliation. PLoS One, 12(6), e0179334.
Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346–371.
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi‐university collaborations. Research Policy, 36(10), 1620–1634.
- Cummings, J. N., Kiesler, S., Bosagh Zadeh, R., & Balakrishnan, A. D. (2013). Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: A longitudinal study of productivity in research groups. Psychological Science, 24(6), 880–890.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dahlander, L., & McFarland, D. A. (2013). Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 69–110.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups; a study of human factors in housing. Stanford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fox, M. F., & Faver, C. A. (1984). Independence and cooperation in research: The motivations and costs of collaboration. Journal of Higher Education, 55(3), 347–359.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., Huang, G. C., Serrano, K. J., Rice, E. L., Tsakraklides, S. P., & Fiore, S. M. (2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 532–548.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 132–142.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- He, C., Wu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Research leadership flow determinants and the role of proximity in research collaborations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71, 1341–1356.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johann, D., & Mayer, S. J. (2019). The perception of scientific authorship across domains. Minerva, 57(2), 175–196.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kabo, F. W. (2016). A model of potential encounters in the workplace: The relationships of homophily, spatial distance, organizational structure, and perceived networks. Environment and Behavior, 49(6), 638–662.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kabo, F. W., Cotton‐Nessler, N., Hwang, Y., Levenstein, M. C., & Owen‐Smith, J. (2014). Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 43(9), 1469–1485.
- Kabo, F. W., Hwang, Y., Levenstein, M., & Owen‐Smith, J. (2015). Shared paths to the lab. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), 57–84.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
- Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (1st ed., pp. 57–80). MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kleinbaum, A. M. (2018). Reorganization and tie decay choices. Management Science, 64(5), 2219–2237.
- Kraut, R. E., & Streeter, L. A. (1995). Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69–82.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In J. Galegher & R. Kraut (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork (pp. 149–171). Erlbaum.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In Distributed work (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, Y.‐N., Walsh, J. P., & Wang, J. (2015). Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact. Research Policy, 44(3), 684–697.
- Lungeanu, A., & Contractor, N. S. (2014). The effects of diversity and network ties on innovations: The emergence of a new scientific field. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(5), 548–564.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87–119.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 640–667.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence and other essays. Simon and Schuster.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. (2009). Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463–502.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Owen‐Smith, J. (2001). Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 427–452.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Reagans, R. (2011). Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science, 22(4), 835–849.
- Sailer, K., & McCulloh, I. (2012). Social networks and spatial configuration—How office layouts drive social interaction. Social Networks, 34(1), 47–58.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Small, M. L., & Adler, L. (2019). The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(45), 111–132.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Snow, D. A., Zurcher, L. A., Jr., & Ekland‐Olson, S. (1980). Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment. American Sociological Review, 45(5), 787–801.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2017). The elephant in the schoolhouse: The role of propinquity in school staff interactions about teaching. Sociology of Education, 90(2), 149–171.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. Academic Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849–1857.
Wang, J. (2016). Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration. Research Policy, 45(1), 68–80.
- White, K. (2019). Publication output: US trends and international comparisons. National Science Board: Science and Engineering Indicators.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now