Alesina, A., & Ferrara, S. L. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904.
Andreoni, J. (1988a). Privately provided public goods in a large economy. Journal of Public Economics, 35, 57–73.
Andreoni, J. (1988b). Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37(3), 291–304.
Balafoutas, L., Kocher, M. G., Putterman, L., & Sutter, M. (2013). Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment. European Economic Review, 60, 32–51.
Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.
Bose, B., & Rabotyagov, S. (2018). Provision of public goods using a combination of lottery and a provision point. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 73, 99–115.
Buckley, E., & Croson, R. (2006). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4–5), 935–955.
Cadigan, J., Wayland, P. T., Schmitt, P., & Swope, K. (2011). An experimental dynamic public goods game with carryover. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80, 523–531.
Cardenas, J. (2003). Real wealth and experimental cooperation: Experiments in the field lab. Journal of Development Economics, 70, 263–289.
Cason, T. N., & Zubrickas, R. (2017). Enhancing fundraising with refund bonuses. Games and Economic Behavior, 101, 218–233.
Cason, T. N., Masters, W. A., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2020). Winner‐take‐all and proportional‐prize contests: Theory and experimental results. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 175, 314–327.
Chan, K. S., Mestelman, S., Moir, R., & Muller, R. (1996). The voluntary provision of public goods under varying income distributions. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), 54–69.
Chan, K. S., Mestelman, S., Moir, R., & Muller, R. (1999). Heterogeneity and the voluntary provision of public goods. Experimental Economics, 2, 5–30.
Cherry, T. L., Kroll, S., & Shogren, J. F. (2005). The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 357–365.
Chowdhury, S. M., Sheremeta, R. M., & Turocy, T. L. (2014). Overbidding and overspreading in rent‐seeking experiments: Cost structure and prize allocation rules. Games and Economic Behavior, 87, 224–238.
- Conlon, J. R., & Pecorino, P. (2021). Public good provision with participation costs. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 24, 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12551.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Corazzini, L., Faravelli, M., & Stanca, L. (2010). A prize to give for: An experiment on public goods funding mechanism. The Economic Journal, 120, 944–967.
- D'Aspremont, C., & Gerard‐Varet, L. (1979). Incentives and incomplete information. Journal of Public Economics, 11, 25–45.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dale, D. J., & Morgan, J. (2010). Silence is golden. Suggested donations in voluntary contribution games. Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Davis, D., Razzolini, L., Reilly, R., & Wilson, B. J. (2003). Raising revenues for charity: Auctions versus lotteries. Research in Experimental Economics, 11, 47–91.
Duffy, J., & Matros, A. (2013). All‐pay auctions vs. lotteries as provisional fixed‐prize fundraising mechanisms: Theory and evidence. Working Paper.
Faravelli, M. (2011). The important this is not (always) winning but taking part: Funding public goods with contests. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 13(1), 1–22.
- Fischbacher, U. (2007). z‐Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready‐made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Foster, J. (2020). Loss aversion and sunk cost sensitivity in all‐pay auctions for charity: Theory and experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 84, 101486.
Franke, J., & Leininger, W. (2014). On the efficient provision of public goods by means of biased lotteries: The two player case. Economics Letters, 125, 436–439.
Franke, J., & Leininger, W. (2018). Lotteries and Lindahl prices in public good provision. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 20, 840–848.
Fung, J. M. Y., & Au, W. (2014). Effect of inequality on cooperation: Heterogeneity and hegemony in public goods dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 9–22.
Gächter, S., Mengel, F., Tsakas, E., & Vostroknutov, A. (2017). Growth and inequality in public good provision. Journal of Public Economics, 150, 1–13.
- Gangadharan, L., Nikiforakis, N., & Villeval, M. C. (2017). Normative conflict and the limits of self‐governance in heterogeneous populations. European Economic Review, 100, 143–156.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Goeree, J., Maasland, E., Onderstal, S., & Turner, J. (2005). How (not) to raise money. Journal of Political Economy, 113(4), 897–918.
Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41, 617–631.
Groves, T., & Ledyard, J. (1977). Optimal allocation of public goods: A solution to the free rider problem. Econometrica, 45, 783–809.
Hargreaves Heap, S. P., Ramalingam, A., & Stoddard, B. V. (2016). Endowment inequality in public goods games: A re‐examination. Economics Letters, 146, 4–7.
Hofmeyr, A., Burns, J., & Visser, M. (2007). Income inequality, reciprocity and public good provision: An experimental analysis. South African Journal of Economics, 75, 508–520.
Isaac, R. M., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 179–199.
Jindapon, P., & Yang, Z. (2020). Free riders and the optimal prize in public‐good funding lotteries. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 22, 12189–1312.
Keser, C. (1996). Voluntary contributions to a public good when partial contribution is a dominant strategy. Economics Letters, 50(3), 359–66.
Keser, C., & vanWinden, F. (2000). Conditional cooperation in voluntary contributions to public goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1), 23–39.
Keser, C., Markstädter, A., Schmidtc, M., & Schnitzlerd, C. (2014). Social costs of inequality: heterogeneous endowments in public‐good experiments. Cege Discussion Papers, No. 217, University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (cege), Göttingen.
Lange, A., List, J. A., & Price, M. K. (2007). Using lotteries to finance public goods: Theory and experimental evidence. International Economic Review, 48(3), 901–927.
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development: Does participation work? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8256-1. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0.
Morgan, J. (2000). Financing public goods by means of lotteries. The Review of Economic Studies, 67, 761–784.
- Morgan, J., & Sefton, M. (2000). Financing public goods by means of lotteries: Experimental evidence. The Review of Economic Studies, 67, 785–710.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nikiforakis, N., Noussair, C. N., & Wilkening, T. (2012). Normative conflict and feuds: The limits of self‐enforcement. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 797–807.
Nitta, K. (2014). The effect of income heterogeneity in an experiment with global and local public goods. University of Hawaii at Mānoa Department of Economics Working Paper.
Noussair, C. N., & Tan, F. (2011). Voting on punishment systems within a heterogeneous group. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 13(5), 661–693.
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Oxoby, R. J., & Spraggon, J. (2013). A clear and present minority: Heterogeneity in the source of endowments and the provision of public goods. Economic Inquiry, 51(4), 2071–2082.
- Palfrey, T. R., & Prisbrey, J. E. (1996). Altruism, reputation and noise in linear public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 409–427.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pecorino, P., & Temimi, A. (2007). Lotteries, group size and public good provision. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9, 451–465.
- Pecorino, P., & Temimi, A. (2008). The group‐size paradox revisited. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10, 785–799.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rapoport, A. (1988). Provision of step‐level public goods: Effects of inequality in resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 432–440.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rapoport, A. (1993). Incremental contribution in step‐level public goods games with asymmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 55, 171–194.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Seçilmiş, I. E., & Güran, M. C. (2012). Income heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of dynamic public goods. Pacific Economic Review, 17(5), 693–707.
Sheremeta, R. M. (2011). Contest design: An experimental investigation. Economic Inquiry, 49, 573–590.
Walker, M. (1981). A simple incentive compatible scheme for attaining lindahl allocations. Econometrica, 49, 65–71.
Zizzo, D. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economics experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98.