1. Spillovers and strategic commitment in R&D. (2024). Tian, Jingwen ; Liu, Huizhong.
   In: Theory and Decision.
   RePEc:kap:theord:v:96:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-023-09953-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Optimization and analysis of three-part tariff pricing strategies. (2023). Lin, Shi-Woei ; Merdikawati, Silvia ; Wu, Shan-Fei ; Yeh, Ruey-Huei.
   In: OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management.
   RePEc:spr:orspec:v:45:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s00291-023-00730-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Amir, R., Encaoua, D., & Lefouili, Y. (2014). Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in the shadow of litigation. Games and Economic Behavior, 88, 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.09.009.

2. Banerjee, S., & Poddar, S. (2019). To sell or not to sell: Licensing versus selling by an outside innovator. Economic Modelling, 76, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.08.006.

3. Bousquet, A., Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M., & Wolkowicz, M. (1998). Risk sharing in licensing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00005-2.

4. Colombo, S., & Filippini, L. (2015). Patent licensing with bertrand competitors. The Manchester School, 83, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12050.

5. Colombo, S., & Filippini, L. (2016). Revenue royalties. Journal of Economics, 118, 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-015-0459-z.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Colombo, S., Ma, S., Sen, D., & Tauman, Y. (2021). Equivalence between fixed fee and ad valorem profit royalty. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 23, 1052–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12534.

7. Crama, P., De Ryck, B., & Degraeve, Z. (2008). Milestone payments or royalties? Contract design for R&D licensing. Operations Research, 56, 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0589.

8. D'Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J. F. (1979). On hotelling's stability in competition. Econometrica, 47, 1145–1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911955.

9. Encaoua, D., & Lefouili, Y. (2009). Licensing weak patents. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57, 492–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00386.x.

10. Fan, C., Jun, B. H., & Wolfstetter, E. G. (2018). Per unit vs. ad‐valorem royalty licensing. Economics Letters, 170, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.06.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Faulí‐Oller, R., & Sandonís, J. (2002). Welfare reducing licensing. Games and Economic Behavior, 41, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00513-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Gallini, N. T., & Wright, B. D. (1990). Technology transfer under asymmetric information. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555500.

13. Geradin, D., & Layne‐Farrar, A. (2011). Patent value apportionment rules for complex, multi‐patent products. Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, 4, 763–792. http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol27/iss4/3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Heywood, J. S., Li, J., & Ye, G. (2014). Per unit vs. ad‐valorem royalties under asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.07.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Hsu, J., Liu, L., Henry Wang, X., & Zeng, C. (2019). Ad‐valorem versus per‐unit royalty licensing in a cournot duopoly model. The Manchester School, 87, 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12280.

17. Kabiraj, T., & Lee, C. C. (2011). Licensing contracts in hotelling structure. Theoretical Economics Letters, 01, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2011.13013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Kamien, M. I., & Tauman, Y. (2002). Patent licensing: The inside story. The Manchester School, 70, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00280.

19. Lim, T., & Veugelers, R. (2003). On equity as a payment device in technology licensing with moral hazard. Working Paper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Lu, Y., & Poddar, S. (2014). Patent licensing in spatial models. Economic Modelling, 42, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.06.016.

21. Ma, S., Sen, D., & Tauman, Y. (2021). Optimal patent licensing: From three to two‐part tariffs. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Macho‐Stadler, I., Martinez‐Giralt, X., & David pérez‐Castrillo, J. (1996). The role of information in licensing contract design. Research Policy, 25, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00815-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N., & Stamatopoulos, G. (2010). Location equilibrium with asymmetric firms: The role of licensing. Journal of Economics, 99, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-009-0104-9.

24. Mukhopadhyay, S., Kabiraj, T., & Mukherjee, A. (1999). Technology transfer in duopoly: The role of cost asymmetry. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-0560(99)00040-4.

25. Niu, S. (2013). The equivalence of profit‐sharing licensing and per‐unit royalty licensing. Economic Modelling, 32, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.033.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Poddar, S., & Sinha, U. B. (2004). On patent licensing in spatial competition. Economic Record, 80, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00173.x.

27. Poddar, S., Banerjee, S., & Ghosh, M. (2020). Technology transfer in spatial competition when licensees are asymmetric. The Manchester School, 89, 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Rockett, K. (1990). The quality of licensed technology. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(90)90030-5.

29. San Martín, M., & Saracho, A. I. (2010). Royalty licensing. Economics Letters, 107, 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. San Martín, M., & Saracho, A. I. (2015). Optimal two‐part tariff licensing mechanisms. The Manchester School, 83, 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12059.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. San Martín, M., & Saracho, A. I. (2016). Patent strength and optimal two‐part tariff licensing with a potential rival incorporating ad‐valorem royalties. Economics Letters, 143, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.03.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Sen, D., & Tauman, Y. (2007). General licensing schemes for a cost‐reducing innovation. Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2006.07.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Sen, N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2017). Technology licensing between rival firms in presence of asymmetric information. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 17, 20150097. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2015-0097.

34. Shapiro, C. (1985). Patent licensing and R&D rivalry. American Economic Review, 75, 25–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805565.

35. Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. The Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 546–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555525.

36. Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities’. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007884111883.

37. Vishwasrao, S. (2007). Royalties vs. fees: How do firms pay for foreign technology?’. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.007.

38. Wang, X. H. (1998). Fee versus royalty licensing in a cournot duopoly model. Economics Letters, 60, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00092-5.

1. Licensing option to reduce rent extraction by the input supplier. (2024). Mukherjee, Arijit ; Kao, Kuofeng.
   In: Journal of Public Economic Theory.
   RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:26:y:2024:i:1:n:e12682.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Patent licensing for signaling the cost‐reduction innovation: The case of the insider innovator. (2024). Tsai, Tsung-Sheng ; Wu, Chengtai.
   In: Journal of Public Economic Theory.
   RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:26:y:2024:i:1:n:e12667.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Stable licensing schemes in technology transfer. (2024). Kishimoto, Shin.
   In: Journal of Public Economic Theory.
   RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:26:y:2024:i:1:n:e12664.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Patenting uncertainty and its impact on innovation: evidence from the United States. (2023). Saunoris, James W ; Goel, Rajeev K ; Dohse, Dirk.
   In: Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
   RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:319919.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. E-commerce and parcel delivery: environmental policy with greens consumers. (2023). Cremer, Helmuth ; Lozachmeur, Jean-Marie ; Malavolti, Estelle ; Joram, Denis ; Borsenberger, Claire.
   In: TSE Working Papers.
   RePEc:tse:wpaper:128071.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Patenting uncertainty and its impact on innovation: evidence from the United States. (2023). Saunoris, James ; Goel, Rajeev ; Dohse, Dirk.
   In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
   RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:48:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10961-023-10014-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. E-commerce and parcel delivery: environmental policy with greens consumers. (2023). Cremer, Helmuth ; Lozachmeur, Jean-Marie ; Malavolti, Estelle ; Joram, Denis ; Borsenberger, Claire.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04088352.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. E-commerce and parcel delivery: environmental policy with green consumers. (2023). Cremer, Helmuth ; Borsenberger, Claire ; Lozachmeur, Jean-Marie ; Malavolti, Estelle ; Joram, Denis.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03613363.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Optimal patent licensing—Two or three‐part tariff. (2023). Poddar, Sougata ; Mukherjee, Arijit ; Banerjee (Bandyopadhyay), Swapnendu.
   In: Journal of Public Economic Theory.
   RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:624-648.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Licensing standard‐essential patents with costly enforcement. (2023). Bourreau, Marc ; Mnire, Yann ; De, Rafael C.
    In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
    RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:827-855.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. E-commerce and parcel delivery: environmental policy with green consumers. (2022). Cremer, Helmuth ; Lozachmeur, Jean-Marie ; Malavolti, Estelle ; Joram, Denis ; Borsenberger, Claire.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:126748.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Optimal licensing contracts with a downstream oligopoly: insider versus outsider innovation. (2022). Tsai, Tsung-Sheng ; Wu, Cheng-Tai.
    In: Economic Theory Bulletin.
    RePEc:spr:etbull:v:10:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40505-022-00224-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. E-commerce and parcel delivery: environmental policy with green consumers. (2022). Cremer, Helmuth ; Lozachmeur, Jean-Marie ; Malavolti-Grimal, Estelle ; Joram, Denis ; Borsenberger, Claire.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03613363.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Sooner or Later? The Role of Adoption Timing in New Technology Introduction. (2022). Xu, Wenxin ; Tang, Wenjie ; Wang, Tong.
    In: Production and Operations Management.
    RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1663-1678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Does technology licensing matter for privatization?. (2020). Zeng, Chenhang ; Mukherjee, Arijit.
    In: Journal of Public Economic Theory.
    RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:22:y:2020:i:5:p:1462-1480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Optimal licensing under incomplete information: the case of the inside patent holder. (2018). Wolfstetter, Elmar ; Fan, Cuihong ; Jun, Byoung Heon.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:66:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00199-017-1077-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Cross-Licensing and Competition. (2017). Lefouili, Yassine ; Jeon, Doh-Shin.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:29317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Probabilistic Patents, Alternative Damage Rules and Optimal Trade Policy. (2017). Pal, Rupayan ; Kaushik, Arun ; Dey, Apurva.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11748.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Revenue royalties. (2016). Filippini, Luigi ; Colombo, Stefano.
    In: Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:118:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00712-015-0459-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Patent licensing under financial structure with limited liability. (2016). Wang, Yi-Jie ; Liang, Wen-Jung ; Tsai, Ming-Che ; Mai, Chao-Cheng.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:121-135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in a differentiated Stackelberg duopolistic competition market. (2016). Wang, Xuejun ; Hong, Xianpei ; Qing, Ping ; Zhang, Huaige.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:45:y:2016:i:c:p:215-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. On the licensing of a technology with unknown use. (2016). Badia, Bruno ; Tumendemberel, Biligbaatar .
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:100:y:2016:i:c:p:220-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Welfare effects of compulsory licensing. (2015). Seifert, Jacob.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:48:y:2015:i:3:p:317-350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Cross-Licensing and Competition. (2015). Lefouili, Yassine ; Jeon, Doh-Shin.
    In: IDEI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ide:wpaper:29318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Cross-Licensing and Competition. (2015). Lefouili, Yassine ; Jeon, Doh-Shin.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10941.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 13:36:07 || Missing content? Let us know