create a website

Intentions for a third child: The role of parental sex composition preferences. (2022). Parasnis, Jaai ; Mishra, Ankita.
In: Kyklos.
RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:75:y:2022:i:3:p:472-487.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 36

References cited by this document

Cocites: 60

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Allendorf, K. (2015). Fertility decline, gender composition of families, and expectations of old age support. Population Research and Policy Review, 34(4), 511–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9354-5.

  2. Andersson, G., Hank, K., & Vikat, A. (2007). Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: Lessons from Sweden and Finland. Demographic Research, 17, 135–156. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.6.

  3. Andersson, G., Hank, K., Rønsen, M., & Vikat, A. (2006). Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography, 43(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0010.

  4. Angin, Z., & Shorter, F. C. (1998). Negotiating reproduction and gender during the fertility decline in Turkey. Social Science & Medicine, 47(5), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00079-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Anukriti, S., Bhalotra, S. R. & Tam, H. F. (2016). On the quantity and quality of girls: New evidence on abortion, fertility, and parental investments. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10271.

  6. Arnold, F. (1997). Gender Preferences for Children. DHS Comparative Studies No. 23. Macro International.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Arnold, F., & Kuo, E. (1984). The value of daughters and sons: A comparative study of the gender preferences of parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 15(2), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.15.2.299.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Arnold, F., Kishor, S., & Roy, T. K. (2002). Sex‐selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 759–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00759.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Aurino, E. (2017). Do boys eat better than girls in India? Longitudinal evidence on dietary diversity and food consumption disparities among children and adolescents. Economics and Human Biology, 25, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.10.007.

  10. Bongaarts, J. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review, 39(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00588.x.

  11. Brunson, J. (2010). Son preference in the context of fertility decline: limits to new constructions of gender and kinship in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 41(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00229.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Chung, W., & Das Gupta, M. (2007). Why is son preference declining in South Korea? The role of development and public policy, and the implications for China and India. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4373.

  13. Den Boer, A., & Hudson, V. (2017). Patrilineality, son preference, and sex selection in South Korea and Vietnam. Population and Development Review, 43, 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12041.

  14. Fuse, K. (2010). Variations in attitudinal gender preferences for children across 50 less‐developed countries. Demographic Research, 23(36), 1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.36.

  15. Fuse, K. (2013). Daughter preference in Japan: A reflection of gender role attitudes? Demographic Research, 28, 1021–1052. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.36.

  16. Fuse, K., & Crenshaw, E. M. (2006). Gender imbalance in infant mortality: a cross‐national study of social structure and female infanticide. Social Science & Medicine, 62(2), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.006.

  17. Hank, K. (2007). Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Biosocial Science, 39(5), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932006001787.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ICF. (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS‐4), 2015/16: India. IIPS.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS‐3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. IIPS.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Jayachandran, S. (2015). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115404.

  21. Jayachandran, S., & Pande, R. (2017). Why are Indian children so short? The role of birth order and son preference. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2600–2629. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151282.

  22. Karki, Y. B. (1988). Sex preference and the value of sons and daughters in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 19(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1966752.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Kodzi, I. A., Johnson, D. R., & Casterline, J. B. (2012). To have or not to have another child: Life cycle, health and cost considerations of Ghanaian women. Social Science & Medicine, 74(7), 966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.035.

  24. Lundberg, S. (2005). Sons, daughters, and parental behaviour. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri020.

  25. Milazzo, A. (2018). Why are adult women missing? Son preference and maternal survival in India. Journal of Development Economics, 134, 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.06.009.

  26. Mishra, A., & Parasnis, J. (2017). Peers and fertility preferences: An empirical investigation of the role of neighbours, religion and education. Social Indicators Research, 134(1), 339–357.

  27. Mishra, A., & Parasnis, J. (2021). Husband, sons and the fertility gap: evidence from India. Journal of Population Research, 38(1), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-021-09254-4.

  28. Murphy, R., Tao, R., & Lu, X. (2011). Son preference in rural China: Patrilineal families and socioeconomic change. Population and Development Review, 37(4), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00452.x.

  29. Park, C. B., & Cho, N. H. (1995). Consequences of son preference in a low‐fertility society: imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review, 21, 59–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137413.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Rahman, M., & DaVanzo, J. (1993). Gender preference and birth spacing in Matlab, Bangladesh. Demography, 30(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061643.

  31. Sandström, G., & Vikström, L. (2015). Sex preference for children in German villages during the fertility transition. Population Studies, 69(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.994667.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 37(20), 61–66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Tian, F. F., & Morgan, S. P. (2015). Gender composition of children and the third birth in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Vu, T. M. (2014). One male offspring preference: evidence from Vietnam using a split‐population model. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(4), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9183-z.

  35. Walsh, C. (2011). A search theory of dowry. Available from The University of Sydney Sydney eScholarship database. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2123/7945.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Zaidi, B., & Morgan, S. P. (2016). In the pursuit of sons: Additional births or sex‐selective abortion in Pakistan? Population and Development Review, 42(4), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12002.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Gender Preferences for Children and Gender Relations in Contemporary China. (2024). Wu, Yuling.
    In: Sociological Research Online.
    RePEc:sae:socres:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:675-693.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Sex Selection for Daughters: Demographic Consequences of Female-Biased Sex Ratios. (2022). Kolk, Martin ; Jebari, Karim.
    In: Population Research and Policy Review.
    RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-022-09710-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Disparities in Gender Preference and Fertility: Southeast Asia and Latin America in a Comparative Perspective. (2022). Becquet, Valentine ; Sacco, Nicolas ; Pardo, Ignacio.
    In: Population Research and Policy Review.
    RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-021-09692-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. How Does Childrens Sex Affect Parental Sex Preference: Preference Adaptation and Learning. (2022). Yin, Yongkun ; Jiang, Quanbao ; Shang, Qianqian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cmf:wpaper:wp2022_2202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Intentions for a third child: The role of parental sex composition preferences. (2022). Parasnis, Jaai ; Mishra, Ankita.
    In: Kyklos.
    RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:75:y:2022:i:3:p:472-487.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Gender Preferences in Central and Eastern Europe as Reflected in Partnership and Fertility Outcomes. (2021). Oczkowska, Monika ; Myck, Michal ; Wowczko, Izabela.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14244.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Explaining residential clustering of fertility. (2020). Cools, Sara ; Hart, Rannveig K ; Bergsvik, Janna.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ssb:dispap:939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The More the Merrier? The Causal Effect of High Fertility on Later-Life Loneliness in Eastern Europe. (2020). van den Broek, Thijs ; Tosi, Marco.
    In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
    RePEc:spr:soinre:v:149:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-019-02254-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Family Size and Educational Attainment: Cousins, Contexts, and Compensation. (2020). Molitoris, Joseph ; Jager, Mads Meier ; Blaabak, Ea Hoppe.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:36:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10680-019-09543-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Natives’ and Immigrants’ Gender Preferences for Children in Germany. (2020). Carol, Sarah ; Hank, Karsten.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:36:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10680-019-09527-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Childrens socio-emotional skills: Is there a quantity-quality trade-off?. (2020). Lepinteur, Anthony ; Le Forner, Hélène ; Briole, Simon.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02503920.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Children’s socio-emotional skills: Is there a quantity–quality trade-off?. (2020). Lepinteur, Anthony ; Le Forner, Hélène ; Briole, Simon.
    In: Labour Economics.
    RePEc:eee:labeco:v:64:y:2020:i:c:s0927537120300178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Another Gendered Demographic Dividend: Adjusting to a Future without Sons. (2020). Allendorf, Keera.
    In: Population and Development Review.
    RePEc:bla:popdev:v:46:y:2020:i:3:p:471-499.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Childrens socio-emotional skills: Is there a quantity-quality trade-off?. (2020). Lepinteur, Anthony ; Le Forner, Hélène ; Briole, Simon.
    In: AMSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:aim:wpaimx:2006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Transition to third birth among immigrant mothers in Sweden: Does having two daughters accelerate the process?. (2019). Miranda, Vitor ; Ma, LI ; Mussino, Eleonora.
    In: Journal of Population Research.
    RePEc:spr:joprea:v:36:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12546-019-09224-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries. (2019). Fallesen, Peter ; Jalovaara, Marika ; Dommermuth, Lars ; Dahlberg, Johan ; Andersson, Gunnar ; Neyer, Gerda ; Lappegrd, Trude.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:35:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10680-018-9492-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Son Preference and Human Capital. (2019). Wang, Qingfeng.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:95411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Male infants and birth complications are associated with increased incidence of postnatal depression. (2019). Myers, Sarah ; Johns, Sarah E.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:220:y:2019:i:c:p:56-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Valkyries: Was gender equality high in the Scandinavian periphery since Viking times? Evidence from enamel hypoplasia and height ratios. (2019). Baten, Joerg ; Buckwalter, Laura Maravall.
    In: Economics & Human Biology.
    RePEc:eee:ehbiol:v:34:y:2019:i:c:p:181-193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Is There Still Son Preference in the United States?. (2019). Kahn, Lawrence ; Cook, Jason ; Brummund, Peter ; Blau, Francine ; Larson-Koester, Miriam.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1830.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. All-time low period fertility in Finland: drivers, tempo effects, and cohort implications. (2019). Myrskyla, Mikko ; Hellstrand, Julia ; Nisen, Jessica.
    In: MPIDR Working Papers.
    RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2019-006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Is There Still Son Preference in the United States?. (2019). Kahn, Lawrence ; Cook, Jason ; Brummund, Peter ; Blau, Francine ; Larson-Koester, Miriam.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Parental Gender Preference in the Balkans and Scandinavia: Gender Bias or Differential Costs?. (2019). Abramishvili, Zurab ; Appleman, William ; Maksymovych, Sergii.
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp643.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Origins of gender norms: sibling gender composition and womens choice of occupation and partner. (2018). Brenøe, Anne ; Brenoe, Anne Ardila.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Gender Bias in Parental Attitude: An Experimental Approach. (2018). Islam, Asad ; grossman, philip ; Begum, Lutfunnahar.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:55:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13524-018-0699-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Differential Mortality of Undesired Infants in Sub-Saharan Africa. (2018). Flato, Martin.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:55:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13524-017-0638-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Parents’ Preferences for Sex of Children in Sweden: Attitudes and Outcomes. (2018). Miranda, Vitor ; Dahlberg, Johan ; Andersson, Gunnar.
    In: Population Research and Policy Review.
    RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:37:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-018-9462-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Origins of Gender Norms: Sibling Gender Composition and Womens Choice of Occupation and Partner. (2018). Brenøe, Anne ; Brenoe, Anne Ardila.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11692.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The Effect of a Siblings Gender on Earnings, Education and Family Formation. (2018). Peter, Noemi ; Lundborg, Petter ; Mikkelsen, Sara ; Webbink, Dinand.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2018_003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The effect of a sibling’s gender on earnings and family formation. (2018). Peter, Noemi ; Lundborg, Petter ; Mikkelsen, Sara ; Webbink, Dinand.
    In: Labour Economics.
    RePEc:eee:labeco:v:54:y:2018:i:c:p:61-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. First daughter effects in Japan. (2018). Takaku, Reo.
    In: Journal of the Japanese and International Economies.
    RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:50:y:2018:i:c:p:48-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Effect of Childhood Family Size on Fertility in Adulthood: New Evidence From IV Estimation. (2017). Cools, Sara ; Hart, Rannveig Kaldager.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:54:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s13524-016-0537-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Old Habits Die Hard? Lingering Son Preference in an Era of Normalizing Sex Ratios at Birth in South Korea. (2017). Agadjanian, Victor ; Hayford, Sarah R ; Yoo, Sam Hyun.
    In: Population Research and Policy Review.
    RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:36:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11113-016-9405-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Childbearing trends in Iceland, 1982–2013: Fertility timing, quantum, and gender preferences for children in a Nordic context. (2017). Jonsson, Ari Klangur.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:37:y:2017:i:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Postmarital residence and child sex selection: Evidence from northeastern Japan, 1716–1870. (2017). Kurosu, Satomi ; Dong, Hao.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:37:y:2017:i:43.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Children’s Sex and the Happiness of Parents. (2016). Margolis, Rachel ; Myrskyla, Mikko.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:32:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10680-016-9387-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Gender-Differentiated Parenting Revisited: Meta-Analysis Reveals Very Few Differences in Parental Control of Boys and Girls. (2016). Groeneveld, Marleen G ; Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J ; Mesman, Judi ; Endendijk, Joyce J.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0159193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The effect of childhood family size on fertility in adulthood. New evidence form IV estimation. (2015). Cools, Sara ; Hart, Rannveig Kaldager.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ssb:dispap:802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The causal effect of an additional sibling on completed fertility: An estimation of intergenerational fertility correlations by looking at siblings of twins. (2015). Kolk, Martin.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:32:y:2015:i:51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The intergenerational transfer of the employment gender gap. (2014). Telle, Kjetil ; Rege, Mari ; Haaland, Venke Furre ; Votruba, Mark.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ssb:dispap:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The effect of education, family size, unemployment and childcare availability on birth stopping and timing. (2014). Varga, Márton.
    In: Portuguese Economic Journal.
    RePEc:spr:portec:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:95-115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. New Partners, More Kids. (2014). Guzzo, Karen Benjamin.
    In: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
    RePEc:sae:anname:v:654:y:2014:i:1:p:66-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Identifying Gender Bias in Parental Attitude: An Experimental Approach. (2014). Islam, Asad ; grossman, philip ; Begum, Lutfunnahar.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2014-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. One male offspring preference: evidence from Vietnam using a split-population model. (2014). Vu, Tien.
    In: Review of Economics of the Household.
    RePEc:kap:reveho:v:12:y:2014:i:4:p:689-715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The effect of children on depression in old age. (2014). Reinhold, Steffen ; Kruk, Kai Eberhard .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:100:y:2014:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Sex composition of children, parental separation, and parity progression: Is Finland a Nordic outlier?. (2014). Saarela, Jan ; Finnas, Fjalar.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:30:y:2014:i:2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research. (2013). Billari, Francesco ; Balbo, Nicoletta ; Mills, Melinda.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:29:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s10680-012-9277-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Household Formation Rules, Fertility and Female Labour Supply: Evidence from post-communist countries. (2013). Grogan, Louise.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gue:guelph:2013-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Household formation rules, fertility and female labour supply: Evidence from post-communist countries. (2013). Grogan, Louise.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:41:y:2013:i:4:p:1167-1183.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Daughter preference in Japan: A reflection of gender role attitudes?. (2013). Fuse, Kana.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:28:y:2013:i:36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. The Intergenerational Transfer of the Gender Gap in Labor Force Participation. (2013). Telle, Kjetil ; Rege, Mari ; Haaland, Venke Furre ; Votruba, Mark.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Where Are the Babies? Labor Market Conditions and Fertility in Europe. (2011). Adsera, Alicia.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:27:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s10680-010-9222-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Using Split-Population Models to Examine Predictors of the Probability and Timing of Parity Progression. (2010). Kippen, Rebecca ; Anderson, Jon ; Gray, Edith ; Evans, Ann.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:26:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s10680-009-9201-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. The Effect of Children on Earnings Using Exogenous Variation in Family Size: Swedish Evidence. (2009). Hirvonen, Lalaina .
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:sofiwp:2009_002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. Does public housing occupancy increase unemployment?. (2009). Goffette-Nagot, Florence ; Dujardin, Claire.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00436679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Development, modernization, and son preference in fertility decisions. (2008). Schady, Norbert ; Friedman, Jed ; Filmer, Deon.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:4716.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Childbearing dynamics of couples in a universalistic welfare state: the role of labor-market status, country of origin, and gender. (2007). Scott, Kirk ; Andersson, Gunnar.
    In: MPIDR Working Papers.
    RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2007-016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: Lessons from Sweden and Finland. (2007). Hank, Karsten ; Andersson, Gunnar ; Vikat, Andres.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:17:y:2007:i:6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: lessons from Sweden and Finland. (2006). Hank, Karsten ; Andersson, Gunnar ; Vikat, Andres.
    In: MPIDR Working Papers.
    RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2006-019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  60. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 13:39:39 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.