create a website

Fiscal and Welfare Effects of Raised Fertility in Poland: Overlapping Generations Model Estimates. (2019). Tyrowicz, Joanna ; Malec, Magda ; Makarski, Krzysztof.
In: Population and Development Review.
RePEc:bla:popdev:v:45:y:2019:i:4:p:795-818.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 40

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Cash transfers and fertility: Evidence from Poland’s Family 500+ Policy. (2024). Bokun, Anna.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Horizontal FDI in a Dynamic Cournot - Oligopoly with Endogenous Entry. (2020). Goerke, Laszlo.
    In: IAAEU Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iaa:dpaper:202003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Thorstein Veblen, Joan Robinson, and George Stigler (probably) never met: Social Preferences, Monopsony, and Government Intervention. (2020). Neugart, Michael ; Goerke, Laszlo.
    In: IAAEU Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iaa:dpaper:202001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adda, Jérôme, Christian Dustmann, and Katrien Stevens. 2017. “The career costs of children.” Journal of Political Economy 125(2): 293–337.

  2. Ahmed, Saifuddin, Qingfeng Li, Li Liu, and Amy O. Tsui. 2012. “Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: An analysis of 172 countries.” The Lancet 380(9837): 111–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Auerbach, Alan and Lawrence J. Kotlikoff. 1987. Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Baizan, Pau, Bruno Arpino, and Carlos E. Delclòs. 2016. “The effect of gender policies on fertility: The moderating role of education and normative context.” European Journal of Population 32(1): 1–30.

  5. Baudin, Thomas. 2011. “Family policies: What does the standard endogenous fertility model tell us?” Journal of Public Economic Theory 13(4): 555–593.

  6. Bauernschuster, Stefan, Timo Hener, and Helmut Rainer. 2015. “Children of a (policy) revolution: the introduction of universal child care and its effect on fertility.” Journal of the European Economic Association 14(4): 975–1005.

  7. Bongaarts, John, and Tomáš Sobotka. 2012. “A demographic explanation for the recent rise in European fertility.” Population and Development Review 38(1): 83–120.

  8. Bratti, Massimiliano, and Konstantinos Tatsiramos. 2011. “The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe.” Journal of Population Economics 25(1): 291–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Brewer, Mike, et al. 2012. “Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK.” Journal of Population Economics 25(1): 245–266.

  10. Casterline, John, and Sigi Han. 2017. “Unrealized fertility: Fertility desires at the end of the reproductive career.” Demographic Research 36: 427–454.

  11. Cremer, Helmuth, Firouz Gahvari, and Pierre Pestieau. 2006. “Pensions with endogenous and stochastic fertility.” Journal of Public Economics 90(12): 2303–21.

  12. Del Boca, Daniela, Silvia Pasqua, and Chiara Pronzato. 2009. “Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective.” Oxford Economic Papers 61(Suppl 1): i147–i171.

  13. Drago, Robert, et al. 2011. “Did Australias baby bonus increase fertility intentions and births?” Population Research and Policy Review 30(3): 381–397.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Easterlin, Richard A. 1975. “An economic framework for fertility analysis.” Studies in Family Planning 6(3): 54–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Erosa, Andres, Luisa Fuster, and Diego Restuccia. 2016. “A quantitative theory of the gender gap in wages.” European Economic Review 85: 165–187.

  16. Fehr, Hans, Manuel Kallweit, and Fabian Kindermann. 2017. “Families and social security.” European Economic Review 91(3): 30–56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Fokkema, Tineke, et al. 2008. “The Netherlands: Childbearing within the context of a ‘Poldermodel’ society.” Demographic Research 19(21): 743–794.

  18. Frejka, Tomas, and Sergei Zakharov. 2013. “The apparent failure of Russias pronatalist family policies.” Population and Development Review 39(4): 635–647.

  19. Garganta, Santiago, et al. 2017. “The effect of cash transfers on fertility: Evidence from Argentina.” Population Research and Policy Review 36(1): 1–24.

  20. Georges, Patrick, and Aylin Seçkin. 2016. “From pro‐natalist rhetoric to population policies in Turkey? An OLG general equilibrium analysis.” Economic Modelling 56: 79–93.

  21. Gray, Jeffrey S. 1998. “Divorce‐law changes, household bargaining, and married womens labor supply.” American Economic Review 88(3): 628–642.

  22. Havnes, Tarjei, and Magne Mogstad. 2011. “Money for nothing? universal child care and maternal employment.” Journal of Public Economics 95(11): 1455–1465.

  23. Hock, Heinrich, and David N. Weil. 2012. “On the dynamics of the age structure, dependency, and consumption.” Journal of Population Economics 25(3): 1019–1043.

  24. Inhorn, Marcia, and Frank Van Balen. 2002. Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Khan, M.E., et al. 2016. “Conditional and unconditional cash transfers to improve use of contraception in low and middle income countries: A systematic review.” Studies in Family Planning 47(4): 371–383.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Lalive, Rafael, and Josef Zweimueller. 2009. “How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3): 1363–1402.

  27. Laroque, Guy, and Bernard Salanie. 2014. “Identifying the response of fertility to financial incentives.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 29(2): 314–332.

  28. Lee, Ronald, et al. 2014. “Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption.” Science 346(6206): 229–234.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Liao, Pei‐Ju. 2011. “Does demographic change matter for growth?” European Economic Review 55(5): 659–667.

  30. Ludwig, Alexander, and Michael Reiter. 2010. “Sharing demographic risk–who is afraid of the baby bust?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2(4): 83–118.

  31. Ludwig, Alexander, Thomas Schelkle, and Edgar Vogel. 2012. “Demographic change, human capital and welfare.” Review of Economic Dynamics 15(1): 94–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Milligan, Kevin. 2005. “Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87(3): 539–555.

  33. Nishiyama, Shinichi, and Kent Smetters. 2007. “Does social security privatization produce efficiency gains?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: 1677–1719.

  34. Olivetti, Claudia, and Barbara Petrongolo. 2017. “The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high‐income countries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31: 205–230.

  35. Regnier‐Loilier, Arnaud, and Daniele Vignoli. 2011. “Fertility intentions and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy.” Population 66(2): 361–389.

  36. Rindfuss, Ronald R., et al. 2010. “Child‐care availability and fertility in Norway.” Population and Development Review 36(4): 725–748.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Rossin‐Slater, Maya. 2018. “Chapter 14: Maternity and family leave policy.” In The Oxford Handbook on the Economics of Women, edited by S.L. Averett, L M. Argys, and S.D. Hoffman, 323–342. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Sánchez‐Romero, Miguel. 2013. “The role of demography on per capita output growth and saving rates.” Journal of Population Economics 26(4): 1347–177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Sinclair, Sarah, Boymal Jonathan, and Ashton De Silva. 2012. “A re‐appraisal of the fertility response to the Australian baby bonus.” Economic Record 88(S1): 78–87.

  40. Werding, Martin. 2014. “Children are costly, but raising them may pay: the economic approach to fertility.” Demographic Research 30: 253–276.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does Knowledge in Management Foster Firm Creation and Performance?. (2023). Montmartin, Benjamin ; Laffineur, Catherine ; Minniti, Maria.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2023-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Women’s reproductive health and economic activity: A narrative review. (2021). Finlay, Jocelyn E.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:139:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x2030440x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A Pipeline for Variable Selection and False Discovery Rate Control With an Application in Labor Economics. (2020). Klose, Sophie-Charlotte ; Lederer, Johannes.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2006.12296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Long-run consequences of informal elderly care and implications of public long-term care insurance. (2019). Korfhage, Thorben.
    In: Ruhr Economic Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:rwirep:813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Fertility effects of college education: Evidence from the German educational expansion. (2019). Westphal, Matthias ; Kamhofer, Daniel.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Long-run consequences of informal elderly care and implications of public long-term care insurance. (2019). Korfhage, Thorben.
    In: Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers.
    RePEc:yor:hectdg:19/17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Marriage market dynamics, gender, and the age gap. (2019). Shephard, Andrew.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:19-003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Exposure to More Female Peers Widens the Gender Gap in STEM Participation. (2019). Zölitz, Ulf ; Brenøe, Anne ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Brenoe, Anne Ardila.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12582.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Evaluating Welfare and Economic Effects of Raised Fertility. (2019). Tyrowicz, Joanna ; Malec, Magda ; Makarski, Krzysztof.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Expanding access to universal childcare: Effects on childcare arrangements and maternal employment. (2019). Bousselin, Audrey ; Audrey, Bousselin.
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2019-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Le scelte di fertilit? e la durata della maternit? in Italia: vincoli economici e norme sociali. (2019). Verashchagina, Alina ; Ghignoni, Emanuela ; Di Gioacchino, Debora.
    In: QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO.
    RePEc:fan:quaqua:v:html10.3280/qua2019-110005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits. (2019). Raute, Anna.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:203-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Adherence to cultural norms and economic incentives: Evidence from fertility timing decisions. (2019). Chabé-Ferret, Bastien ; Chabe-Ferret, Bastien.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:162:y:2019:i:c:p:24-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Long-Run Consequences of Informal Elderly Care and Implications of Public Long-Term Care Insurance. (2019). Korfhage, Thorben.
    In: SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp1051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Do Parental Leaves Make the Motherhood Wage Penalty Worse? Assessing Two Decades of German Reforms. (2019). Cutuli, Giorgio ; Mari, Gabriele.
    In: SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp1025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Exposure to More Female Peers Widens the Gender Gap in STEM Participation. (2019). Zölitz, Ulf ; Brenøe, Anne ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Brenoe, Anne.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13966.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Exposure to More Female Peers Widens the Gender Gap in STEM Participation. (2019). Zölitz, Ulf ; Brenøe, Anne ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Brenoe, Anne Ardila.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7829.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Exposure to more female peers widens the gender gap in STEM participation. (2018). Zölitz, Ulf ; Brenøe, Anne ; Brenoe, Anne Ardila ; Zolitz, Ulf.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. If not now, when? The timing of childbirth and labour market outcomes. (2018). Staffolani, Stefano ; Pigini, Claudia ; Picchio, Matteo ; Verashchagina, Alina.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits. (2018). Raute, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:871.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A structural approach to assessing retention policies in public schools. (2018). Vera, Celia Patricia.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:90657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Macroeconomic Implications of Modeling the Internal Revenue Code in a Heterogeneous-Agent Framework. (2018). Pecoraro, Brandon ; Moore, Rachel.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:87240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Effect of Residential Location and Housing Unit Characteristics on Labor Force Participation of Childbearing Women in Indonesia: Using Twin Births As A Quasi-Natural Experiment. (2018). Sofiyandi, Yusuf.
    In: LPEM FEBUI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lpe:wpaper:201822.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Distribution of the Gender Wage Gap. (2018). Fernandez Sierra, Manuel ; Bhalotra, Sonia.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. If Not Now, When? The Timing of Childbirth and Labour Market Outcomes. (2018). Verashchagina, Alina ; Staffolani, Stefano ; Pigini, Claudia ; Picchio, Matteo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11270.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Microsimulation of Child Benefits: A Review of Studies. (2018). Urban, Ivica ; Pezer, Martina.
    In: International Journal of Microsimulation.
    RePEc:ijm:journl:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:134-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. A cautionary note on the reliability of the online survey data - the case of Wage Indicator. (2018). van der Velde, Lucas ; Tyrowicz, Joanna ; Smyk, Magdalena ; Malec, Magda.
    In: GRAPE Working Papers.
    RePEc:fme:wpaper:26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Evaluating welfare and economic effects of raised fertility. (2018). Tyrowicz, Joanna ; Malec, Magda ; Makarski, Krzysztof.
    In: GRAPE Working Papers.
    RePEc:fme:wpaper:25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Early gender gaps among university graduates. (2018). Parey, Matthias ; Francesconi, Marco.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:63-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A macro-level approach to assess the early developmental vulnerabilities of children in Australia: A local government area-based analysis. (2018). Biswas, Raaj Kishore ; Kabir, Enamul.
    In: Children and Youth Services Review.
    RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:93:y:2018:i:c:p:161-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. If not now, when? The timing of childbirth and labour market outcomes. (2018). Verashchagina, Alina ; Staffolani, Stefano ; Pigini, Claudia ; Picchio, Matteo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:anc:wpaper:425.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Firms, Informality, and Development: Theory and Evidence from Brazil. (2018). Ulyssea, Gabriel.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:108:y:2018:i:8:p:2015-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Long-term Consequences of Early Parenthood. (2018). Verner, Mette ; Johansen, Eva Rye.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:aah:aarhec:2018-01-.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Long-term Consequences of Early Parenthood. (2018). Nielsen, Helena ; Verner, Mette ; Johansen, Eva Rye.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:aah:aarhec:2018-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The effects of paternity leave on fertility and labor market outcomes. (2017). Gonzalez, Libertad ; Farre, Lidia ; Luna, Libertad Gonzalez.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:1572.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Children and Careers: How Family Size Affects Parents’ Labor Market Outcomes in the Long Run. (2017). Strøm, Marte ; Markussen, Simen ; Cools, Sara ; Strom, Marte.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:54:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s13524-017-0612-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Optimal Social Assistance and Umemployment Insurance in a Life-Cycle Model of Family Labor Supply and Savings. (2017). Prowse, Victoria ; Haan, Peter.
    In: Purdue University Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:pur:prukra:1294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Can Financial Incentives Reduce the Baby Gap? Evidence from a Reform in Maternity Leave Benefits. (2017). Raute, Anna.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23793.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Indirect Inference with Importance Sampling: An Application to Women’s Wage Growth. (2017). Sauer, Robert ; Taber, Christopher R.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23669.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Betting the House: How Assets Influence Marriage Selection, Marital Stability, and Child Investments. (2017). Lafortune, Jeanne ; Low, Corinne.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Indirect Inference with Importance Sampling: An Application to Womens Wage Growth. (2017). Sauer, Robert ; Taber, Christopher.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The Effects of Paternity Leave on Fertility and Labor Market Outcomes. (2017). Gonzalez, Libertad ; Farre, Lidia.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Top Earnings Inequality and the Gender Pay Gap: Canada, Sweden and the United Kingdom. (2017). Bell, Brian ; Fortin, Nicole M ; Bohm, Michael Johannes.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10829.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Selection on Ability and the Early Career Growth in the Gender Wage Gap. (2017). Soares, Rodrigo ; Gonzaga, Gustavo ; Fraga, Eduardo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10791.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The Lifecycle Wage Growth of Men and Women: Explaining Gender Differences in Wage Trajectories. (2017). Thoursie, Peter Skogman ; Bronson, Mary Ann.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:geo:guwopa:gueconwpa~17-17-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Parenthood and productivity of highly skilled labor: Evidence from the groves of academe. (2017). Zimmermann, Christian ; Krapf, Matthias ; Ursprung, Heinrich W.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:140:y:2017:i:c:p:147-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Childbearing Postponement, its Option Value, and the Biological Clock. (2017). Pommeret, Aude ; de la Croix, David.
    In: LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES.
    RePEc:ctl:louvir:2017016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits. (2017). Raute, Anna.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Can Financial Incentives Reduce the Baby Gap? Evidence from a Reform in Maternity Leave Benefits. (2017). Raute, Anna.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The Effects of Paternity Leave on Fertility and Labor Market Outcomes. (2017). Gonzalez, Libertad ; Farre, Lidia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:978.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 03:51:00 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.