create a website

A Review of an Urban Living Lab Initiative. (2021). de Marco, Alberto ; Tanda, Adriano.
In: Review of Policy Research.
RePEc:bla:revpol:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:370-390.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 60

References cited by this document

Cocites: 35

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?. (2022). Menezes, Monique ; Gonalves, Karoline Vitoria ; Reis, Erick Elysio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9826-:d:884085.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abowd, G. D., Atkeson, G. D., Bobock, A. F., Essa, I. A., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., & Starner, T. E. (2000). Living laboratories: The future computing environments group at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Paper presented at the CHI '00 on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands, April 1–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2008). Living labs and open innovation: Roles and applicability. eJOV: The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organization & Networks, 10, 21–46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2011). Living labs: Arbiters of mid‐and ground‐level innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(1), 87–102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). The rise of the smart city. In L. G. Anthopoulos (Ed.), Understanding smart cities: A tool for smart government or an industrial trick? (pp. 5–45). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

  5. Ballon, P., Pierson, J., & Delaere, S. (2005). Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation: Examining european practice. Paper presented at the 16th European Regional Conference by the International Telecommunications Society, Porto, Portugal, September 4–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Battaglia, A., & Tremblay, D. G. (2011). 22@ and the innovation district in Barcelona and Montreal: A process of clustering development between urban regeneration and economic competitiveness. Urban Studies Research, 2011, 1–17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Breuer, J., Walravens, N., & Ballon, P. (2014). Beyond defining the smart city. Meeting top‐down and bottom‐up approaches in the middle. TeMA‐Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. http://www.bdc.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/2475.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, April 15. Retrieved November 15, 2017 from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the‐era‐of‐open‐innovation/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Città di Torino. (2009). Piano d’azione per l’Energia Sostenibile. Retrieved from http://www.comune.torino.it/ambiente/bm~doc/tape‐2.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Città di Torino. (2016). Avviso pubblico per la ricerca di soggetti interessati alla promozione, lo sviluppo, il testing e la sperimentazione di iniziative e soluzioni tecnologiche innovative in ambito “Smart City” sull’area del quartiere campidoglio. Retrieved from: http://torinolivinglab.it/wp‐content/uploads/2016/01/Campidoglio_Avviso_torino‐_25‐01‐2016_Def.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Città di Torino. (2018). Avviso Pubblico “Torino Living Lab Axto – Contributi Per Sperimentazioni Innovative Applicate All’economia Collaborativa E Circolare Per Le Periferie Torinesi”. Retrieved from: http://torinolivinglab.it/wp‐content/uploads/2018/06/Avviso_TLL_SCE_prorogato.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Cohen, B. (2014). Smart city index master indicators survey. Smart Cities Council, October 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2017 from http://smartcitiescouncil.com/resources/smart‐city‐index‐master‐indicators‐survey.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Cosgrave, E., Tryfonas, T., & Crick, T. (2014). The smart city from a public value perspective. Paper presented in the 2nd International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, Stockholm, Sweden, August 24–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11(5), 2544–2551.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. De la Peña, B., & (2013). The autocatalytic city. In T.E.D. books city 2.0: The habitat of the future and how to get there (ebook), New York City, NY: T.E.D. Conferences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Edwards‐Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672–692.

  18. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2005). State‐of‐the‐art in utilizing living labs approach to user‐centric ICT innovation‐a European approach. Lulea, Sweden: Center for Distance‐spanning Technology, Lulea University of Technology Sweden.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. European Commission. (2009). Design as a driver of user‐centred innovation. Commission Staff Working Document SEC(2009)501. Belgium, Brussels: Author. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/2583/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Følstad, A. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness, 10, 99–131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), 223–228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Giffinger, R., & Pichler‐Milanović, N. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium‐sized cities, Wien, Austria: Centre of Regional Science, Wien University of Technology.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Higgins, A., & Klein, S. (2011). Introduction to the living lab approach. In Y. Tan, N. Björn‐Andersen, S. Klein, & B. Rukanova (Eds.), Accelerating global supply chains with IT‐innovation (pp. 31–36). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

  24. Johnson, P., & Robinson, P. (2014). Civic hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of Policy Research, 31(4), 349–357.

  25. Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 22–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Kusiak, A. (2007). Innovation: The living laboratory perspective. Computer‐Aided Design and Applications, 4(6), 863–876.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Kweit, M. G., & Kweit, R. W. (1984). The politics of policy analysis: The role of citizen participation in analytic decisionmaking. Review of Policy Research, 3(2), 234–245.

  28. Lander, B. (2014). The role of institutions and capital in intersectoral collaboration: Infection and immunity research and development collaboration in Vancouver. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 390–407.

  29. Lazaroiu, G. C., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy, 47(1), 326–332.

  30. Lee, J. H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M. C. (2014). Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80–99.

  31. Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2012). Towards innovation in Living Labs networks. International Journal of Product Development, 17(1–2), 43–59.

  32. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living labs as open‐innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Levén, P., & Holmström, J. (2008). Consumer co‐creation and the ecology of innovation: A living lab approach. Paper presented at the 31st Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Are, Sweden, August 8–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability‐based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1338.

  35. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Michelucci, F. V., De Marco, A., & Tanda, A. (2016). Defining the role of the smart‐city manager: An analysis of responsibilities and skills. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(3), 23–42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Mirijamdotter, A., Stählbröst, A., Sällström, A., Niitamo, V., & Kulkki, S. (2006). The European network of living labs for CWE‐user‐centric co‐creation and Innovation. Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications and Case Studies, 3, 840–847.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Möller, K., Rajala, R., & Westerlund, M. (2008). Service innovation myopia? A new recipe for client‐provider value creation. California Management Review, 50(3), 31–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Monfaredzadeh, T., & Berardi, U. (2015). Beneath the smart city: Dichotomy between sustainability and competitiveness. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 6(3), 140–156.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Nam, T. T. A., & Pardo, A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Paper presented at the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, College Park, MD, June 12–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Niitamo, V. P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006). State‐of‐the‐art and good practice in the field of living labs. Paper presented at the 2006 International Technology Management Conference (ICE), Milan, Italy, June 26–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Pablo‐Romero, M. D. P., Sánchez‐Braza, A., & Manuel González‐Limón, J. (2015). Covenant of mayors: Reasons for being an environmentally and energy friendly municipality. Review of Policy Research, 32(5), 576–599.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Schaffers, H., & Santoro, R. (2010). The living labs concept enhancing regional innovation policies and instruments. Paper presented at the 2010 International Technology Management Conference (ICE), Lugano, Switzerland, June 21–23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Schaffers, H., Cordoba, M. C., Hongisto, P., Kallai, T., Merz, C., & van Rensburg, J. (2007). Exploring business models for open innovation in rural living labs. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), Sophia‐Antipolis, France, June 4–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2013). Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 28–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Schuurman, D., Lievens, B., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2012). Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel‐centered living lab‐approach. Paper presented at the PICMET ’12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, Vancouver, Canada, July 29–31, August 1–2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Shamsi, T. A. (2008). Living labs: Good practices in Europe. In J. Schumacher & V. Niitamo (Eds.), European living labs—A new approach for human centric regional innovation (pp. 15–30). Berlin, Germany: WVB.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Stratigea, A., Papadopoulou, C. A., & Panagiotopoulou, M. (2015). Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), 43–62.

  49. Tanda, A., & De Marco, A. (2018a). Drivers of public demand of IoT‐enabled smart city services: A regional analysis. Journal of Urban Technology, 25(4), 77–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Tanda, A., & De Marco, A. (2018b). Business model framework for smart city mobility projects. Paper presented at the 3rd World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering‐Architecture‐Urban Planning Symposium, Prague, June 18–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Tanda, A., De Marco, A., & Rosso, M. (2017). Evaluating the impact of smart city initiatives. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, Porto, Portugal, April 22–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. The European Network of Living Labs. (2011). Living labs definition. Retrieved March 3, 2018 from https://enoll.org/about‐us/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Torino Smart City. (2015). La vision. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from http://www.torinosmartcity.it/torino‐smart‐city/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new Utopia. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014‐Highlights.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision, volume I: Comprehensive tables. New York, NY: Author.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Walravens, N. (2015). Qualitative indicators for smart city business models: The case of mobile services and applications. Telecommunications Policy, 39(3–4), 218–240.

  58. Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: Experiences from living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1), 19–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Wikström, S. (1996). Value creation by company—Consumer interaction. Journal of Marketing Management, 12(5), 359–374.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Zhong, X., Chan, H. H., Rogers, T. J., Rosenberg, C. P., & Coyle, E. J. (2006). The development and eStadium testbeds for research and development of wireless services for large‐scale sports venues. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, Barcelona, Spain, March 1–3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Integrated Smart City Solutions: A Multi-Axis Approach for Sustainable Development in Varanasi. (2025). Bisegna, Fabio ; Abbasi, Behnam ; Gujrati, Tejas ; Vespasiano, Flavia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3152-:d:1626733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Innovative Pathways for Collaborative Governance in Technology-Driven Smart Communities. (2024). Wang, Wei ; Tian, Nailing.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:98-:d:1554138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Smart Mobility in German-Speaking Cities and Sarajevo: Differences, Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons for Implementation Success. (2024). Situm, Mario ; Lazovi-Pita, Lejla ; Mangafi, Jasmina ; Sorrentino, Giuseppe.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7108-:d:1459206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Smart ‘Tourist Cities’ Revisited: Culture-Led Urban Sustainability and the Global Real Estate Market. (2023). Papoui-Evangelou, Maria ; Salvati, Luca ; Vardopoulos, Ioannis ; Nosova, Bogdana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4313-:d:1083252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Digital Twin Smart Cities for Disaster Risk Management: A Review of Evolving Concepts. (2023). Mahendrini, M R ; Wedawatta, Gayan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11910-:d:1209313.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Creative Industries as Part of a Sustainable Urban Development Strategy: Vilnius City Case. (2023). Strazdas, Rolandas ; Erneviit, Jrat.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10778-:d:1190339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Global Whitewashing of Smart Cities: Citizens’ Perspectives. (2023). Mutambik, Ibrahim.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8100-:d:1148279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Analyzing the Challenges for Future Smart and Sustainable Cities. (2023). de Lima, Yuri Oliveira ; de Castro, Vitor ; Pagliusi, Rodrigo Pereira ; Argolo, Matheus ; de Souza, Jano Moreira ; Salazar, Herbert ; Moreira, Clinton Hudson ; Barbosa, Carlos Eduardo ; Lyra, Alan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7996-:d:1146527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. How to Encourage Public Engagement in Smart City Development—Learning from Saudi Arabia. (2023). Abusharhah, Majed ; Mutambik, Ibrahim ; Alharbi, Fawaz ; Almuqrin, Abdullah.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1851-:d:1249846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sustainable Smart Cities—Social Media Platforms and Their Role in Community Neighborhood Resilience—A Systematic Review. (2023). Liu, Yiqiao ; Elayan, Suzanne ; Balakrishnan, Soumya ; Feick, Rob ; Sykora, Martin ; Solter, Marin ; Shankardass, Ketan ; Hewitt, Christopher.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:18:p:6720-:d:1234202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Measuring Smart City Performance: a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach. (2022). Valvi, Theodora ; Sotirelis, Pantelis ; Nakopoulos, Panagiotis ; Grigoroudis, Evangelos ; Carayannis, Elias.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:13:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-021-00847-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Do Smart Cities Technologies Contribute to Local Economic Development?. (2022). Abutabenjeh, Sawsan ; Nukpezah, Julius A ; Azhar, Annus.
    In: Economic Development Quarterly.
    RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:36:y:2022:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Unpacking the ‘15-Minute City’ via 6G, IoT, and Digital Twins: Towards a New Narrative for Increasing Urban Efficiency, Resilience, and Sustainability. (2022). Allam, Zaheer ; Bibri, Simon Elias ; Chabaud, Didier ; Jones, David ; Moreno, Carlos.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03997414.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance. (2022). Allam, Zaheer ; Bibri, Simon Elias ; Chabaud, Didier ; Sharifi, Ayyoob.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5275-:d:803474.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization. (2022). Golubchikov, Oleg ; Thornbush, Mary J.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10080-:d:888312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Greencoin as an AI-Based Solution Shaping Climate Awareness. (2022). Kowal, Jolanta ; Anacka, Helena ; Obracht-Prondzyska, Hanna ; Duda, Ewa.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11183-:d:907971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland. (2022). Brzeziski, Ukasz ; Wyrwicka, Magdalena Krystyna.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8213-:d:962759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. An emergent taxonomy of boundary spanning in the smart city context – The case of smart Dublin. (2022). Bradshaw, Robert ; Guerin, Michael ; Singh, Harminder ; Karimikia, Hadi ; Donnellan, Brian ; Ojo, Adegboyega.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:185:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522006217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Citizen empowerment and satisfaction with smart city app: Findings from Jakarta. (2022). Zhu, Yu-Qian ; Alamsyah, Nurwahyu.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521007381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Digital Transformation of Public Administration – A Comparative Analysis at European Union Countries. (2022). David, Sofia ; Bacalum, Silviu ; Mihu, Marian.
    In: Economics and Applied Informatics.
    RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2022:i:2:p:121-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Nexus Services in Smart City Ecosystems. (2021). Tsoutsa, Paraskevi ; Fitsilis, Panos ; Ragos, Omiros ; Anthopoulos, Leonidas.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:12:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-020-00635-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Characteristics of Conceptually Related Smart Cities (CRSCs) Services from the Perspective of Sustainability. (2021). Yang, Seungwoo ; Kim, Nammi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3334-:d:519304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Smart City Design Differences: Insights from Decision-Makers in Germany and the Middle East/North-Africa Region. (2021). Ringel, Marc.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2143-:d:500811.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Urban Data Dynamics: A Systematic Benchmarking Framework to Integrate Crowdsourcing and Smart Cities’ Standardization. (2021). Moustaka, Vaia ; Anthopoulos, Leonidas G ; Vakali, Athena ; Maitis, Antonios.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8553-:d:605873.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy. (2021). Hajduk, Sawomira ; Jelonek, Dorota.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2691-:d:550193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Antecedents and Consequences of Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Interaction Process with Smart City Development. (2021). Dedova, Mariya ; Savastano, Marco ; Gorelova, Irina ; Dmitrieva, Diana.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:94-:d:630156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Smart City: Definitions, Dimensions, and Initiatives. (2021). Kozlowski, Wojciech ; Suwar, Kacper.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:509-520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Smart City: Definitions, Dimensions, and Initiatives. (2021). Suwar, Kacper ; Kozlowski, Wojciech.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2-part1:p:509-520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. A Review of an Urban Living Lab Initiative. (2021). de Marco, Alberto ; Tanda, Adriano.
    In: Review of Policy Research.
    RePEc:bla:revpol:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:370-390.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Smart City Architecture Development Methodology (SCADM): A Meta-Analysis Using SOA-EA and SoS Approach. (2020). Prasetyo, Yuli Adam ; Lubis, Muharman.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020919528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. SMART CITIES AND SMART, SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. (2020). Petre, Suciu Marta-Christina.
    In: Revista Economica.
    RePEc:blg:reveco:v:72:y:2020:i:1:p:102-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Do international standards influence the development of smart regions and cities?. (2019). Marii, Milica ; Ruso, Jelena ; Horvat, Ana.
    In: Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics.
    RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:37:y:2019:i:2:p:629-652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Smart City Development and Residents’ Well-Being. (2019). Wu, Yenchun Jim ; Zhao, Guanxi ; Lin, Chunpei ; Yu, Chuanpeng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:676-:d:201316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Smart City Indicators: Can They Improve Governance in Croatian Large Cities?. (2018). Jurlina Alibegovic, Dubravka ; Villa, Zeljka Kordej-De ; Sagovac, Mislav.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:iez:wpaper:1805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 09:26:35 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.