- ABA. 2018. A Current Glance at Women in the Law. https://www.pbi.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/10569_a-current-glance-at-women-in-the-law-jan-2018-(1).pdf?sfvrsn=0.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Anderson, K. J., and C. Leaper. 1998. “Meta‐Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How.” Sex Roles 39:225–252.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Arrington, N. B. 2018. “Gender and Judicial Replacement: The Case of US State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Law and Courts 6:127–154.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Arrington, N. B. 2020. “Judicial Merit Selection: Beliefs About Fairness and Undermining of Gender Diversity on the Bench.” Political Research Quarterly 74:1152–1167.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Beattie, G. W. 1982. “Turn‐Taking and Interruption in Political Interviews: Margaret Thatcher and Jim Callaghan Compared and Contrasted.” Semiotica 39:93–114.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Biernat, M., M. J. Tocci, and J. C. Williams. 2012. “The Language of Performance Evaluations: Gender‐Based Shifts in Content and Consistency of Judgment.” Social Psychological and Personality Studies 3(2):186–192.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Black, R. C, T. R. Johnson, R. J. Owens, and J. Wedeking. 2023. “Televised oral arguments and judicial legitimacy: An initial assessment.” Political Behavior XX: 1–23.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Black, R. C., and R. J. Owens. 2012. The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Black, R. C., and R. J. Owens. 2021. “Trends: The Influence of Personalized Knowledge at the Supreme Court: How (some) Former Law Clerks Have the Inside Track.” Political Research Quarterly 74:795–807.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Black, R. C., R. J. Owens, J. Wedeking, and P. C. Wohlfarth. 2020. The Conscientious Justice: How Supreme Court Justices' Personalities Influence the Law, the High Court, and the Constitution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Black, R. C., T. R. Johnson, and J. Wedeking. 2012. Oral Arguments and Coalition Formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Deliberate Dialogue. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bogoch, B. 1999. “Courtroom Discourse and the Gendered Construction of Professional Identity.” Law & Social Inquiry 24(2):329–375.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brambor, T., W. R. Clark, and M. Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1):63–82.
- Bucy, E. P. 2016. “The Look of Losing, Then and Now: Nixon, Obama, and Nonverbal Indicators of Opportunity Lost.” American Behavioral Scientist 60(14):1772–1798.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Butler, J. 1999. Gender Trouble, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- C‐SPAN. 2012. “Conversation with Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.” Video. C‐SPAN. https://www.c‐span.org/video/?308291‐1/conversation‐supreme‐court‐justice‐elena‐kagan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chaplin, T. M. 2015. “Gender and Emotion Expression: A Developmental Contextual Perspective.” Emotion Review 7(1):14–21.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chung, C., and J. Pennebaker. 2007. The Psychological Function of Function Words. In Social Communication, edited by K. Fiedler, 343–359. New York: Psychology Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Clark, T. S., J. K. Staton, Y. Wang, and E. Agichtein. 2018. “Using Twitter to Study Public Discourse of Judicial Decisions.” Journal of Law & Courts 6(1):93–126.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Collins, T. A., T. L. Dumas, and L. P. Moyer 2018. “Tipping the Scales of Justice: Perceptions of Unfair Treatment in the Courtroom.” Justice System Journal 39:303–321.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Collins, T. A., T. L. Dumas, and L. P. Moyer. 2017. “Intersecting Disadvantages: Race, Gender, and Age Discrimination Among Attorneys.” Social Science Quarterly 98:1642–1658.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cunningham, M. 2001. “The influence of parental attitudes and behaviors on children's attitudes toward gender and household labor in early adulthood.” Journal of Marriage and Family 63: 111–122.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Duerst‐Lahti, G., and R.‐M. Kelly. 1995. Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eagly, A. H., and V. J. Steffen. 1984. “Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men Into Social Roles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(4):735–754.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eagly, A., and L. L. Carli. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Epstein, L., W. M. Landes, and R. A. Posner. 2010. “Inferring the Winning Party in the Supreme Court From the Pattern of Questioning at Oral Arguments.” Journal of Legal Studies 39:433–467.
- Escobar‐Lemmon, M. C., V. J. Hoekstra, A. J. Kang, and M. C. Kittilson. 2021. Reimagining the Judiciary: Women's Representation on High Courts Worldwide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Feldman, A., and R. D. Gill. 2019. “Power Dynamics in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: The Relationship Between Gender and Justice‐to‐Justice Interruptions.” Justice System Journal 40(3):173–195.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fischer, A., and M. LaFrance. 2015. “What Drives the Smile and the Tear: Why Women Are More Emotional Expressive Than Men.” Emotion Review 7(1):22–29.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fisher, W. R. 1987. Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Galanter, M. 1974. “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal change.” Law & Society Review 9(1):95–160.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gill, R. D., M. Kagan, and F. Marouf. 2017. “The impact of maleness on judicial decision making: Maculinity, chivalry, and immigration appeals.” Politics, Groups & Identities 7: 509–528.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gleason, S. A. 2020. “Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 73(3):596–608.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gleason, S. A. 2023. “I Can't See You; Can You Hear Me? Gender Norms and Context During In‐Person and Teleconference U.S. Supreme Court Arguments.” Politics & Gender: in press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gleason, S. A., and D. K. Ivy. 2021. “As She Was Saying: The Role of Gender & Narrative in Oral Argument Amicus Success.” Justice System Journal 42:416–433.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gleason, S. A., and E. Smart. 2023. “You Think; Therefore I Am: Gender Schemas & Context in Oral Arguments at the Supreme Court, 1979–2016.” Political Research Quarterly 76:143–157.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gleason, S. A., J. J. Jones, and J. R. McBean. 2019. “The Role of Gender Norms in Judicial Decision‐Making at the U.S. Supreme Court: The Case of Male and Female Justices.” American Politics Research 47(3):494–529.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Glynn, A. N., and M. Sen. 2015. “Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues?” American Journal of Political Science 59(1):37–54.
- Goldschmidt, O. T., and L. Weller. 2000. “‘Talking Emotions’: Gender Differences in a Variety of Conversation Contexts.” Symbolic Interaction 23:117–134.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Haire, S. B., and L. P. Moyer. 2015. Diversity matters: Judicial policy making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hall, M. E. 2018. What Justices Want: Goals and Personality on the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hansford, T. G., and J. F. Spriggs. 2006. The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hazelton, M. L., and R. K. Hinkle. 2022. Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision‐Making. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Houston, R., S. Li, and T. R. Johnson. 2021. “Learning to Speak Up: Acclimation Effects and Supreme Court Oral Argument.” Justice System Journal 42:115–129.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Houston, R., T. R. Johnson, and E. M. Ringsmuth. 2023. SCOTUS and COVID: How the Media Reacted to the Livestreaming of Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jacobi, T., and D. Schweers. 2017. “Justice Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments.” Virginia Law Review 103:1379–1496.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jacobi, T., T. R. Johnson, E. M. Ringsmuth, and M. Sag. 2021. “Oral Arguments in the Time of Covid: The Chief Plays Calvinball.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 2:399–460.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johnson, T. R. 2004. Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johnson, T. R., R. C. Black, and J. Wedeking. 2009b. “Pardon the Interruption: An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Justices' Behavior During Oral Arguments.” Loyola Law Review 55:331–352.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johnson, T. R., R. C. Black, J. Goldman, and S. A. Treul. 2009a. “Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Do Justices Tip Their Hands with Questions at Oral Argument in the U.S. Supreme Court?” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29:241–262.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jones, J. J. 2016. “Talk ‘Like a Man’: the Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013.” Perspectives on Politics 14(3):625–642.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Karpowitz, C. F., and T. Mendelberg. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Karpowitz, C. F., J. Q. Monson, and J. Preece R. 2017. “How To Elect More Women: Gender and Candidate Success in a Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 61(4):927–943.
Kathlene, L. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88(3):560–576.
- Kathlene, L. 2001. “Words that Matter: Women's Voice and Institutional Bias in Public Policy Formation.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, edited by S. J. Carroll, 22–48. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kromphardt, C. D. 2017. “Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender On Voting at the United States Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 38:183–201.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lindom, T., C. Gregory, and T. R. Johnson. 2017. “Gender Dynamics and Supreme Court Oral Arguments.” Michigan State Law Review 2017:1033–1056.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maltzman, F., J. F. Spriggs, and P. J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting law on the Supreme Court: The collegial game. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maroney, T. A. 2011. “The Persistent Cultural Script of Judicial Passion.” California Law Review 99:629–681.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Martin, A. D., and K. M. Quinn. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10:134–153.
- Mattei, L. R. W. 1998. “Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse.” Journal of Politics 60:440–461.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McDermott, R., and P. K. Hatemi. 2011. “Distinguishing Sex and Gender.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44(1):89–92.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McGuire, K. T. 1995. “Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success.” The Journal of Politics 57(1):187–196.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mendelberg, T., C. F. Karpowitz, and J. B. Oliphant. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12:18–44.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Moss‐Racusin, C. A., J. E. Phelan, and L. A. Rudman. 2010. “When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity 11: 140–151.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Moyer, L. P., and S. B. Haire. 2015. “Trailblazers and those that followed: Personal experiences, gender, and judicial empathy.” Law & Society Review 49: 665–689.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mulac, A., H. Giles, J. J. Bradac, and N. A. Palomares. 2013. “The Gender‐Linked Language Effect: An Empirical Test of a General Process Model.” Language Sciences 38:22–31.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Norgren, J. 2018. Stories from trailblazing women lawyers: Lives in the law. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Och, M. 2020. “Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?” Politics & Gender 16:388–408.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Okamoto, D. G., L. S. Rashotte, and L. Smith‐Lovin. 2002. “Measuring Interruption: Syntactic and Contextual Methods of Coding Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 65:38–55.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Patton, D., and J. L. Smith. 2017. “Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Law & Courts 5:337–361.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- PBS. 1988. “This Honorable Court.” Video. C‐SPAN. https://www.c‐span.org/video/?2514‐1/upcoming‐pbs‐program‐supreme‐court&start=791.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pennebaker, J. W. 2011. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. New York: Bloomsbury. https://www.liwc.net/LIWC2007LanguageManual.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pennebaker, J. W., C. K. Chung, M. Ireland, A. Gonzales, and R. J. Booth. 2007. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ralph‐Morrow, E. 2022. “The right men: How masculinity explains the radical right gender gap.” Political Studies 70: 26–44.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rehnquist, W. R. 2001. The Supreme Court. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Reskin, B. F. 2000. “The Proximate Causes of Employment Discrimination.” Contemporary Sociology 29:319–328.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ringsmuth, E. M., A. C. Bryan, and T. R. Johnson. 2013. “Voting Fluidity and Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 66:429–440.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rohde, D. W., and H. j. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision‐Making. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rubin, J. S., and K. S. Robinson. 2020. “Lawyers, Uninterrupted, Adjust to Supreme Court Two‐Minute Rule.” Bloomberg Law, January 7, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 1999. “Feminized Management and Backlash Toward Agenic Women: The Hidden Costs to Women of a Kinder, Gentler Image of Middle Managers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(5):1004–1010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 2001. “Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4):743–762.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sanbonmatsu, K. 2008. “Gender Backlash in American Politics.” Politics & Gender 4(4):634–642.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schill, D. 2012. “The visual image and the political image: A review of communication research in the field of political communication.” The Review of Communication 12: 118–142.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shaw, S. 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse & Society 11(3):401–418.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shih, M., T. L. Pittinsky, and N. Ambady. 1999. “Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance.” Psychological Science 10(1):80–83.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Smith‐Lovin, L., and C. Brody. 1989. “Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition.” American Sociological Review 54:424–435.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Spaeth, H. J., L. Epstein, A. D. Martin, J. A. Segal, T. J. Ruger, and S. C. Benesh. 2021. Supreme Court Database, Version 2021 Release 01. http://scdb.wustl.edu/index.php.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sullivan, B., and M. Canty. 2015. “Interruptions in Search of a Purpose: Oral Argument in the Supreme Court, October Terms 1958–60 and 2010–12.” Utah Law Review 2015(5):1005–1082.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Szmer, J. J., E. B. Kaheny, and T. A. Sarver. 2021. “‘I Haven't Come a Long Way, and I'm Not a Baby’: Task Assignment and Diversity of the Supreme Court Bar.” Social Science Quarterly 102:2907–2929.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Szmer, J. J., T. A. Sarver, and E. B. Kaheny. 2010. “Have We Come a Long Way, Baby? The Influence of Attorney Gender on Supreme Court Decision Making.” Politics & Gender 6:1–36.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Vera, S. V., and A. G. Vidal. 2022. “The Politics of Interruptions: Gendered Disruptions of Legislative Speeches.” Journal of Politics 84(3):1384–1402.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wedeking, J. 2010. “Supreme Court Litigants and Strategic Framing.” American Journal of Political Science 54:617–631.
- West, C. 1979. “Against Our Will: Male Interruptions of Females in Cross‐Sex Conversation.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 327:81–96.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Winkle, J. W., and J. Wedeking. 2003. “Perceptions and Experiences of Gender Fairness in Mississippi Courts.” Judicature 87(3):126–134.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wrightsman, L. S. 2008. Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court: An Empirical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Yu, B. 2014. “Language and Gender in Congressional Speech.” Literacy and Linguistic Computing 29(1):118–132.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now