This document has not been cited yet.

1. Andreoni J., Brown, E., and Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples. Who decides and why does it matter? Journal of Human Resources 38: 111-133.

2. Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2002). Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of Economic Dynamics 5: 720-748.

3. Basu, K. (2006). Gender and say: a model of household behaviour with endogenously determined balance of power. Economic Journal 116(511): 558-580.

4. Basu, K. and Ray, R. (2002). The collective model of the household and an unexpected implication for child labor. Policy Research Working Paper 2813. The World Bank.

5. Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family, Enl. Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6. Bergstrom, Theodore C., .A Fresh Look at the Rotten Kid Theorem and Other Household Mysteries., Journal of Political Economy, 97 (1989), 1138-1159.

7. Blumberg, R. and Coleman, M. (1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. Journal of Family Issues 10: 225-250.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Brown, C., R. Calvi and J. Penglase (2019), ‘Sharing the Pie: Undernutrition, IntraHousehold Allocation, and Poverty, SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3199129 Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (1998). Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66: 1241-1278.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lewbel, A. (2013). Estimating consumption economies of scale, adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power.

10. Browning, M., P.A. Chiappori and Y. Weiss (2014), Economics of the Family, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

11. Calvi, R. (2019), ‘Why Are Older Women Missing in India? The Age Profile of Bargaining Power and Poverty’, Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Campaña, J.C., Giménez-Nadal, J.I. and Molina, J.A. (2018). Efficient labor supply for Latin families: is the intra-household bargaining power relevant? IZA DP N 11695.

13. Chiappori, P.A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56: 63-89.

14. Chiappori, P.A. (1992). Collective labour supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100: 437-467.

15. Chiappori, P.A., and M. Mazzocco, “Static and Intertemporal Household Decisions” (with M. Mazzocco), Journal of Economic Literature, 2017, 55(3), 1–61 Couprie, H., and Ferrant, G. (2015). Welfare comparisons, economies of scales and equivalence scale in time use. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 117-118: 185-210.

16. de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Ziegelmeyer, A. (2011). Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. Theory and Decision 70: 45-64.

17. Desai, S. and Jain, D. (1994). Maternal employment and family dynamics: The social context of women’s work in rural South India. Population and Development Review 20: 115-136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Donni, O. and Molina, J.A. (2018). Household collective models: three decades of theoretical contributions and empirical evidence. IZA DP N 11915.

19. Donni, O., and Chiappori, P.A. (2011). Non-unitary models of household behavior: a survey of the literature. In: Molina, J.A. (ed.). Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Duflo, E., (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: old age pension and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17(1): 125.

21. Dunbar, G. R., A. Lewbel, And K. Pendakur (2013): “Children’s Resources in Collective Households:Identification, Estimation, and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi,” American Economic Review, 103, 438-71.

22. Fujii, T. and Ishikawa, R. (2013). How does childbirth alter intra-household resource allocation? Evidence from Japan. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(3), 362-387.

23. Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997). Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Hoddinott, J. and Haddad, L. (1995). Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Côte d'Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57: 77-96.

25. Kanbur, R. and Haddad, L. (1994). Are better off households more unequal or less unequal: A bargaining theoretic approach to “Kuznets” effects at the micro level. Oxford Economic papers 46(3): 335-458.

26. Konrad, K. A. and Lommerud, K.E. (1995). Family policy with non-cooperative families. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97: 581-601.

27. Koolwal, G. and Ray, R. (2002). Estimating the endogenously determined intrahousehold balance of power and its impact on expenditure pattern. Policy Research Working Paper 2814. The World Bank.

28. Kousta, S. (2019). Why gender gaps persist. Nature Human Behaviour. DOI: 10.1177/0001839219832310.

29. Lakshmanasamy, T. (2003). Testing the unitary and Nash bargaining household models in India. Journal of Social and Economic Development 5: 197-217 Lancaster, G., Maitra, P., and Ray, R. (2006). Endogenous intra‐household balance of power and its impact on expenditure patterns: Evidence from India. Economica 73: 435-460.

30. Lee, J. (2007). Marriage, the sharing rule, and pocket money: The case of South Korea, Economic Development and Cultural Change 55: 557-581.

31. Lundberg, S., and Pollak, R. (1994). Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 84: 132-137.

32. Lundberg, S., and Ward-Batts, J. (2004). Saving for retirement: Household bargaining and household net worth. Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics and Finance Research Paper No. 2004-03.

33. Lundberg, S., Pollak, R.A., and Wales, T.J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources 32: 463-480.

34. Maitra P. and Ray, R. (2005). An integrated test of the unitary household model: evidence from Pakistan. ABERU DP 7. Monash University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2003). The effect of transfers on household expenditure patterns and poverty in South Africa. Journal of Development Economics 71(1): 23-49.

36. Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2005). The impact of intra-household balance of power on expenditure pattern: The Australian evidence. Australian Economic Paper 44: 15-29.

37. Maitra, P. and Ray, R. (2002). Household resources, expenditure patterns and resource pooling: evidence from South Africa. Mimeo. University of Tasmania.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Manser, M. and Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision making: a bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 21(3): 31-44.

39. Martínez, C. (2013). Intrahousehold allocation and bargaining Power: Evidence from Chile, Economic Development and Cultural Change 61: 577-605.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. McElroy, M. and Horney, M. (1981). Nash bargained household decisions. International Economic Review 22(2): 333-350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1998). What’s mine is yours? The influence of male and female incomes on patterns of household expenditure. Economica 65: 599-613.

42. Pollak, R.A. (1994). For better or worse: The roles of power in models of distribution within marriage. American Economic Review: papers and Proceedings 84(2): 148-152.

43. Porter, M. (2017). Spousal bargaining over care for elderly parents in China: Imbalances in sex ratios influence the allocation of support. The Journal of Development studies, 53(4), 514-529.

44. Quisumbing. A.R., and Maluccio, J.A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65: 283-327.

45. Riley, N. (1997). Gender, power and population change. Population Bulletin 52: 1-46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Rubalcava, L., Teruel G., and Thomas, D. (2002). Welfare design, women's empowerment and income pooling. Documento de Trabajo 244. CIDE (Centro de Investigatión y Docencia Económicas).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Samuelson, P. (1956). Social Indifference Curves. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 1-22.

48. Schultz, T.P. (1990). Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of Human Resources 25: 599-631.

49. Sen, A. (1990): “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing,” New York Review of Books, pp. 61–66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Slatton, B.C., Brailey, C.D. (2019). Women and Inequality in the 21st Century. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household Resource Allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources 25: 635-664.

52. Thomas, D., Contreras, D., and Frankenberg, E. (2002). Distribution of power within the household and child health. Mimeo. University of California at Los Angeles.

53. UN Human Development Index (2018). Global Human Development Indicators. United Nations Development Programme.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Yilmazer, T., and Lich, S. (2015). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: a household bargaining approach. Review of Economics of the Household 13: 219-241.

1. Giving time or giving money? On the relationship between charitable contributions. (2021). Dittrich, Marcus ; Mey, Bianka.
   In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
   RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:85:y:2021:i:c:s0167487021000337.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Redesigning the Market for Volunteers: A Donor Registry. (2020). Heger, Stephanie ; Slonim, Robert ; Garbarino, Ellen ; Waller, Daniel ; Wang, Carmen.
   In: Management Science.
   RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:8:p:3528-3541.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Getting a yes. An experiment on the power of asking. (2020). Stolley, Florian ; Bruttel, Lisa.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:86:y:2020:i:c:s2214804320301336.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. How sensitive is the average taxpayer to changes in the tax-price of giving?. (2019). Backus, Peter G ; Grant, Nicky L.
   In: International Tax and Public Finance.
   RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:26:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10797-018-9500-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The Early Life Influences of Teachers Genders on Later Life Charitable Giving: Evidence from the Natural Disasters in Japan. (2019). Yamamura, Eiji ; Powdthavee, Nattavudh.
   In: IZA Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12528.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Gender differences in altruism: Evidence from a natural field experiment on matched donations. (2019). Wollbrant, Conny ; Persson, Emil ; Martinsson, Peter ; Knutsson, Mikael.
   In: Economics Letters.
   RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:176:y:2019:i:c:p:47-50.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The intra-spousal balance of power within the family: cross-cultural evidence. (2019). Molina, José Alberto ; Chiappori, Pierre-Andre.
   In: Boston College Working Papers in Economics.
   RePEc:boc:bocoec:983.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence. (2018). Molina, José Alberto ; Donni, Olivier.
   In: IZA Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11915.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. INTRA€ HOUSEHOLD EXPERIMENTS: A SURVEY. (2018). Munro, Alistair.
   In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
   RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:134-175.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. WHO FAVOURS THE GAY COMMUNITY? EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE USING CHARITABLE DONATIONS. (2018). Sansani, Shahar ; Rozental, Arik.
    In: Bulletin of Economic Research.
    RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:70:y:2018:i:1:p:e1-e16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Strategic Philanthropists: Who Are They and Do They Matter?. (2017). Devlin, Rose Anne ; Barham, Vicky ; Owusu, Rebekah.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ott:wpaper:1717e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Effects of Top Management Team Characteristics on Corporate Charitable Activities: Evidence from the Board for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in China. (2017). Huang, Xin ; Nakagawa, Koichi ; Li, Jie.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics and Business.
    RePEc:osk:wpaper:1730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Waiting To Give: Stated and Revealed Preferences. (2017). Heger, Stephanie ; Craig, Ashley ; Slonim, Robert ; Garbarino, Ellen.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:11:p:3672-3690.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. An Experimental Test of Gender Differences in Charitable Giving: Empathy Is at the Heart of the Matter. (2017). Quiñones, Esteban ; van Rijn, Jordan ; Quinones, Esteban J ; Barham, Bradford L.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Philanthropic Fundraising of Higher Education Institutions: A Review of the Malaysian and Australian Perspectives. (2016). Najdi, Youhanna ; Rohayati, Mohd Isa ; Williamson, John C.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:541-:d:71889.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Left Behind but Doing Good? Civic Engagement in Two Post-Socialist Countries. (2016). Zimmermann, Klaus ; Roman, Monica ; Nikolova, Milena.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cel:dpaper:36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Left Behind but Doing Good? Civic Engagement in Two Post-Socialist Countries. (2015). Zimmermann, Klaus ; Roman, Monica ; Nikolova, Milena.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Left Behind but Doing Good? Civic Engagement in Two Post-Socialist Countries. (2015). Zimmermann, Klaus ; Roman, Monica ; Nikolova, Milena.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10990.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Internet und die Bindung Ehrenamtlicher am Beispiel des Deutschen Roten Kreuzes. (2014). Pierdzioch, Christian ; Emrich, Eike.
    In: Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics.
    RePEc:zbw:eiswps:5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Does giving to charity lead to better health? Evidence from tax subsidies for charitable giving. (2014). Yörük, Barış ; Yoruk, Bar K..
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:71-83.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Does Giving to Charity Lead to Better Health? Evidence from Tax Subsidies for Charitable Giving. (2014). Yörük, Barış.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Are Generous People More Likely to Vote?. (2013). Yörük, Barış.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nya:albaec:13-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Do Charitable Subsidies Crowd Out Political Giving? The Missing Link Between Charitable and Political Contributions. (2013). Yörük, Barış.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nya:albaec:13-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Wallflowers Doing Good: Field and Lab Evidence of Heterogeneity in Reputation Concerns. (2012). Linardi, Sera ; Jones, Daniel.
    In: Working Paper.
    RePEc:pit:wpaper:485.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The impact of charitable subsidies on religious giving and attendance: Evidence from panel data. (2012). Yörük, Barış ; Yoruk, Baris.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nya:albaec:12-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Still different after all these years: Solidarity behavior in East and West Germany. (2011). Weimann, Joachim ; Ockenfels, Axel ; Brosig-Koch, Jeannette ; Helbach, Christoph .
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:95:y:2011:i:11:p:1373-1376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Give more tomorrow: Two field experiments on altruism and intertemporal choice. (2011). Breman, Anna .
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:95:y:2011:i:11:p:1349-1357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Valuing the benefits of the education provided by public universities: A case study of Minnesota. (2011). Glewwe, Paul ; DAMON, AMY.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:30:y:2011:i:6:p:1242-1261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Earned, owned, or transferred: are donations sensitive to the composition of income and wealth?. (2010). Zhang, Ye ; Steinberg, Richard ; Brown, Eleanor ; Rooney, Patrick.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:30082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Do Spouses Cooperate? And If Not: Why?. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid ; Cochard, Francois ; Couprie, Hélène.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:22255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The Effect of Media on Charitable Giving and Volunteering: Evidence from the `Give Five Campaign. (2009). Yörük, Barış ; Yoruk, Baris K..
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nya:albaec:09-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. (2009). Starr, Martha.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:38:y:2009:i:6:p:916-925.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. How responsive are charitable donors to requests to give?. (2009). Yörük, Barış.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:93:y:2009:i:9-10:p:1111-1117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Minimal social cues in the dictator game. (2009). Rigdon, Mary ; Kitayama, Shinobu ; Watabe, Motoki ; Ishii, Keiko.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:30:y:2009:i:3:p:358-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. The widows offering: Inheritance, family structure, and the charitable gifts of women. (2009). McGranahan, Leslie.
    In: Explorations in Economic History.
    RePEc:eee:exehis:v:46:y:2009:i:3:p:356-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SECRET SANTA REVEALS THE SECRET SIDE OF GIVING. (2009). Duncan, Brian.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:47:y:2009:i:1:p:165-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Who wears the trousers? A semiparametric analysis of decision power in couples. (2008). Maurer, Jürgen ; Lührmann, Melanie ; Luhrmann, Melanie.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:08168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Social networks and private philanthropy. (2008). Devlin, Rose Anne ; Apinunmahakul, Amornrat .
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:92:y:2008:i:1-2:p:309-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: The all-or-nothing dictator game. (2007). Bekkers, Rene.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. An Analysis of the Determinants of Tipping Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment and Evidence from Restaurant Tipping. (2006). Parrett, Matt.
    In: Southern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:wly:soecon:v:73:y:2006:i:2:p:489-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. THE GENDER ASSET GAP: WHAT DO WE KNOW AND WHY DOES IT MATTER?. (2006). Doss, Cheryl ; Deere, Carmen Diana.
    In: Feminist Economics.
    RePEc:taf:femeco:v:12:y:2006:i:1-2:p:1-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Using experimental economics to measure the effects of a natural educational experiment on altruism. (2006). Slonim, Robert ; Bettinger, Eric.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Using experimental economics to measure the effects of a natural educational experiment on altruism. (2006). Slonim, Robert ; Bettinger, Eric.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:90:y:2006:i:8-9:p:1625-1648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. New data on charitable giving in the PSID. (2006). Wilhelm, Mark.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:92:y:2006:i:1:p:26-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. How Responsive are Charitable Donors to Requests to Give?. (2006). Yörük, Barış.
    In: Boston College Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:boc:bocoec:653.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Using Experimental Economics to Measure the Effects of a Natural Educational Experiment on Altruism. (2005). Slonim, Robert ; Bettinger, Eric.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11725.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Economic systems and the Buddhist world view: the 21st century nexus. (2005). Daniels, Peter L..
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:34:y:2005:i:2:p:245-268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the US. (2005). Rooney, Patrick ; Chin, William ; Steinberg, Kathryn S. ; Mesch, Debra J..
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:86:y:2005:i:2:p:173-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Which is the fair sex? : Gender differences in altruism. (1998). Vesterlund, Lise ; Andreoni, James.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:att:wimass:199810.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Do People Behave in Experiments as in the Field? � Evidence from Donations. (). Meier, Stephan ; Benz, Matthias.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:248.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-28 01:58:28 || Missing content? Let us know