create a website

Limited Attention and Status Quo Bias. (2014). Masatlioglu, Yusufcan ; Kibris, Ozgur ; Dean, Mark.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:bro:econwp:2014-11.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 34

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. When more is less: Limited consideration. (2017). Ozbay, Erkut ; Nakajima, Daisuke ; Masatlioglu, Yusufcan ; Lleras, Juan Sebastian.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:170:y:2017:i:c:p:70-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Unanimous rules in the laboratory. (2017). Malherbe, Frederic ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Bouton, Laurent.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:179-198.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Unanimous Rules in the Laboratory. (2016). Malherbe, Frederic ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Bouton, Laurent.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21943.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Unanimous Rules in the Laboratory. (2016). Malherbe, Frederic ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Bouton, Laurent.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11087.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Oligopolistic Competition with Choice-Overloaded Consumers. (2015). Gerasimou, Georgios ; Papi, Mauro.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. A. Caplin, M. Dean, and D. Martin. Search and satis…cing. American Economic Review, 101(7): 2899– 2922, 2011.

  2. A. Kempf and S. Ruenzi. Status quo bias and the number of alternatives: An empirical illustration from the mutual fund industry. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(4):204– 213, 2006.

  3. A. Munro and R. Sugden. On the theory of reference-dependent preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50(4):407– 428, 2003.

  4. A. Rubinstein and L. Zhou. Choice problems with a “reference”point. Mathematical Social Sciences, 37(3):205– 209, 1999.

  5. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4):1039– 61, 1991.

  6. B. C. Madrian and D. F. Shea. The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107:1149– 1187, 2001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. B. D. L. Santos, A. Hortacsu, and M. R. Wildenbeest. Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. American Economic Review, 102(6):2955– 80, 2012.

  8. B. Koszegi and M. Rabin. Reference-dependent risk attitudes. The American Economic Review, 97(4):1047– 1073, 2007.

  9. B. Schwartz. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. Harper Perennial, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. C. J. Anderson. The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. E. J. Johnson, J. Hershey, J. Meszaros, and H. Kunreuther. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7(1):35– 51, 1993. E. Kamenica. Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines.

  12. G. Buturak and O. Evren. A theory of choice when “no choice”is an option. 2014. mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. G. de Clippel, K. Elias, and K. Rozen. Competing for Consumer Inattention. Cowles foundation discussion papers, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 2013.

  14. G. Gerasimou. Asymmetric dominance, deferral and status quo bias in a theory of choice with incomplete preferences. 2012. mimeo.

  15. I. G. Tapki. Revealed incomplete preferences under status-quo bias. Mathematical Social Sciences, 53(3):274– 283, 2007.

  16. J. Apesteguia and M. Ballester. A theory of reference-dependent behavior. Economic Theory, 40 (3):427– 455, 2009.

  17. J. R. Hauser and B. Wernerfelt. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4):pp. 393– 408, 1990.

  18. J. S. Lleras, Y. Masatlioglou, D. Nakajima, and E. Ozbay. When More is Less: Limited Consideration. 2010. mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. J. S. Sagi. Anchored preference relations. Journal of Economic Theory, 130(1):283– 295, 2006.

  20. M. Dean. Status Quo Bias in Large and Small Choice Sets. 2009. mimeo New York University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. N. Houy. Choice functions with states of mind. Theory and Decision, 53:1– 26, 2007. W. D. Hoyer. An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product.

  22. P. Manzini and M. Mariotti. Sequentially Rationalizable Choice. American Economic Review, pages 1824– 1839, 2007. P. Manzini and M. Mariotti. Categorize then choose: Boundedly rational choice and welfare.

  23. P. Ortoleva. Status quo bias, multiple priors and uncertainty aversion. Games and Economic Behavior, 69(2):411 –424, 2010. J. H. Roberts and J. M. Lattin. Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition.

  24. R. Sugden. Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 111: 172– 191, 2003.

  25. S. Geng. Decision time, consideration time, and status quo biasÅ . 2014. mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. S. S. Iyengar and M. L. Lepper. When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6):995– 1006, 2000.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. W. Samuelson and R. Zeckhauser. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1:7– 59, 1988.

  28. Y. Masatlioglu and D. Nakajima. Choice by iterative search. Theoretical Economics, 8(3):701– 728, 2013.

  29. Y. Masatlioglu and E. A. Ok. A canonical model of choice with initial endowments. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(2):851– 883, 2014.

  30. Y. Masatlioglu and E. A. Ok. Rational Choice with status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 121:1– 29, 2005.

  31. Y. Masatlioglu and E. A. Ok. Reference-dependent procedural decision making. 2007. mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Y. Masatlioglu and N. Uler. Understanding the reference eect. Games and Economic Behavior, 82(C):403– 423, 2013.

  33. Y. Masatlioglu, D. Nakajima, and E. Y. Ozbay. Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5):2183– 2205, 2012.

  34. Y. Salant and A. Rubinstein. (A, f): Choice with frames. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(4): 1287– 1296, 2008.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren. (2018). Weghake, Jens.
    In: TUC Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:tuc:tucewp:0017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The transitive core: inference of welfare from nontransitive preference relations. (2018). Nishimura, Hiroki.
    In: Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:the:publsh:1769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Fisher paradox: A primer. (2017). Gerke, Rafael ; Hauzenberger, Klemens .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:bubdps:202017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Inferring Cognitive Heterogeneity from Aggregate Choices. (2017). Dardanoni, Valentino ; Manzini, Paola ; Mariotti, Marco ; Tyson, Christopher J.
    In: Discussion Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:san:wpecon:1701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Does inducing choice procedures make individuals better off? An experimental study. (2017). Mittone, Luigi ; Papi, Mauro.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:83:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9590-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Pay Attention or Be Paid for Attention? Impact of Incentives on Allocation of Attention. (2017). Toumi, Mira ; Rafaï, Ismaël.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The excessive choice effect meets the market: A field experiment on craft beer choice. (2017). Malone, Trey ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:67:y:2017:i:c:p:8-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Limited attention and status quo bias. (2017). Masatlioglu, Yusufcan ; Kıbrıs, Özgür ; Dean, Mark ; Kibris, Ozgur.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:169:y:2017:i:c:p:93-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. What is the Causal Impact of Knowledge on Preferences in Stated Preference Studies?. (2016). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. What is the Causal Impact of Knowledge on Preferences in Stated Preference Studies?. (2016). Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. ‘Divide-and-choose’ in list-based decision problems. (2016). Mukherjee, Saptarshi ; Dimitrov, Dinko ; Muto, Nozomu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:81:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-015-9522-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Complexity and biases. (2016). Serra-Garcia, Marta ; KALAYCI, Kenan.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:19:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-015-9434-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Complexity and asset legitimacy in retirement investment. (2016). KALAYCI, Kenan ; Friesen, Lana ; Tse, Alan .
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:60:y:2016:i:c:p:35-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Satisficing and stochastic choice. (2016). Dean, Mark ; Boccardi Chalela, Maria Jose ; Aguiar, Victor.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:166:y:2016:i:c:p:445-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. An experimental study of the decision process with interactive technology. (2016). Samek, Anya ; Kim, Sung-Hee ; Soo, JI ; Hur, Inkyoung.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:20-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Deciding fast and slow. (2016). Pennesi, Daniele.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Limited Attention in Case-Based Belief Formation. (2016). Bleile, Joerg .
    In: Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:bie:wpaper:518.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Accommodating satisficing behavior in stated choice experiments. (2016). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke ; Campbell, Danny.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:235905.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Time and State Dependence in an Ss Decision Experiment. (2016). Oprea, Ryan ; Magnani, Jacopo ; Gorry, Aspen.
    In: American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:aea:aejmac:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:285-310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. What is the Causal Effect of Knowledge on Preferences?. (2015). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2015-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. What is the Causal Effect of Knowledge on Preferences?. (2015). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2015-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network. (2015). Willems, Tim ; Rauch, Ferdinand ; Larcom, Shaun.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:755.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. An Experimental Study of Decision Process with Interactive Technology. (2015). Samek, Anya ; Kim, Sung-Hee ; Soo, JI ; Hur, Inkyoung.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The benefits of forced experimentation: strikingevidence from the London Underground network. (2015). Willems, Tim ; Rauch, Ferdinand ; Larcom, Shaun.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:63832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Choice theory when agents can randomize. (2015). Stoye, Jörg.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:155:y:2015:i:c:p:131-151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Search costs and adaptive consumers: Short time delays do not affect choice quality. (2015). Sonntag, Axel.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:113:y:2015:i:c:p:64-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:4:p:185-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Memory, expectation formation and scheduling choices. (2015). Peer, Stefanie ; Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs.
    In: Economics of Transportation.
    RePEc:eee:ecotra:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:256-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network. (2015). Willems, Tim ; Rauch, Ferdinand ; Larcom, Shaun.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network. (2015). Willems, Tim ; Rauch, Ferdinand ; Larcom, Shaun.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Satisficing and Stochastic Choice. (2015). Dean, Mark ; Boccardi Chalela, Maria Jose ; Aguiar, Victor.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bro:econwp:2015-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Ordinal Relative Satisficing Behavior: Theory and Experiments. (2015). Neme, Alejandro ; Barberà, Salvador ; Barbera, Salvador.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The Transitive Core: Inference of Welfare from Nontransitive Preference Relations. (2014). Nishimura, Hiroki.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ucr:wpaper:201419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Memory, Expectation Formation and Scheduling Choices. (2014). Peer, Stefanie ; Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20140154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition. (2014). Dean, Mark ; Caplin, Andrew.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19876.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Recall searching with and without recall. (2014). Sadrieh, Abdolkarim ; Neugebauer, Tibor ; Di Cagno, Daniela ; Rodriguez-Palmero, Carlos .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:77:y:2014:i:3:p:297-311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Multi-attribute utility models as cognitive search engines. (2014). Analytis, Pantelis P. ; Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos ; Kothiyal, Amit.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:5:p:403-419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Recall Searching with and without Recall. (2014). Sadrieh, Abdolkarim ; Neugebauer, Tibor ; Di Cagno, Daniela ; Rodriguez-Palmero, Carlos .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jau:wpaper:2014/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Rational inattention and revealed preference: The data-theoretic approach to economic modeling. (2014). Caplin, Andrew.
    In: Research in Economics.
    RePEc:eee:reecon:v:68:y:2014:i:4:p:295-305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Search online: Evidence from acquisition of information on online job boards and resume banks. (2014). Brencic, Vera ; Breni, Vera.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:42:y:2014:i:c:p:112-125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Recall Searching with and without Recall. (2014). Sadrieh, Abdolkarim ; Neugebauer, Tibor ; Di Cagno, Daniela ; Rodriguez-Palmero, Carlos .
    In: LSF Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:crf:wpaper:14-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Limited Attention and Status Quo Bias. (2014). Masatlioglu, Yusufcan ; Kibris, Ozgur ; Dean, Mark.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bro:econwp:2014-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Search Costs in Consumer Product Choice: Does Delaying the Provision of Information increase Choice Efficiency?. (2013). Sonntag, Axel.
    In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS).
    RePEc:uea:wcbess:13-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Satisficing and maximizing consumers in a monopolistic screening model. (2013). Papi, Mauro.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:66:y:2013:i:3:p:385-389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Satisficing choice procedures. (2012). Papi, Mauro.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:84:y:2012:i:1:p:451-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Revealed Attention. (2012). Ozbay, Erkut ; Nakajima, Daisuke ; Masatlioglu, Yusufcan.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:102:y:2012:i:5:p:2183-2205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Search, choice, and revealed preference. (2011). Dean, Mark ; Caplin, Andrew.
    In: Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:the:publsh:592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Vote Revelation: Empirical Characterization of Scoring Rules. (2011). Gomberg, Andrei.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cie:wpaper:1102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study. (2011). Nagel, Rosemarie ; Camerer, Colin ; Reutskaja, Elena ; Rangel, Antonio.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:101:y:2011:i:2:p:900-926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 01:22:44 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.