This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abin R., Laca A., Laca A., Diaz M. (2018): Environmental assessment of intensive egg production: A Spanish case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179: 160-168.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Anderson K.E. (2014): Time study examining the effect of range, cage-free, and cage environments on man-hours committed to bird care in 3 brown egg layer strains. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23: 108-115.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Appleby M.C. (2003): The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: History and prospects. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6: 103-121.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Bureau van Dijk (2021): Orbis database. [Unpublished raw data].
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Campe A., Hoes C., Koesters S., Froemke C., Bessei W., Knierim U., Schrader L., Kreienbrock L., Thobe P. (2015): Determinants of economic success in egg production in Germany - here: laying hens kept in aviaries or small-group housing systems. Applied Agricultural and Forestry Research, 65: 227-238.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Castro F.L.S., Chai L., Arango J., Owens C.M., Smith P.A., Reichelt S., DuBois C., Menconi A. (2023): Poultry industry paradigms: Connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 32: 100310.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Cecchini L., Torquati B., Chiorri M. (2018): Sustainable agri-food products: A review of consumer preference studies through experimental economics. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 64: 554-565.

8. Cecchini L., Viecel L., DUrs A., Magistrali C.F., Forte C., Mignacca S.A., Trabalza-Marinucci M., Chiorri M. (2021): Farm efficiency related to animal welfare performance and management of sheep farms in marginal areas of central Italy: A two-stage DEA model. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 20: 955-969.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Dawkins M.S. (2017): Animal welfare and efficient farming: Is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science, 57: 201-208.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Dawkins M.S., Layton R. (2012): Breeding for better welfare: Genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents. Animal Welfare, 21: 147-155.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Demircan V., Yilmaz H., Dernek Z., Bal T., Gül M., Koknaroglu H. (2010): Economic analysis of different laying hen farm capacities in Turkey. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 489-497.

12. Englmaierova M., Tumova E., Charvatova V., Skrivan M. (2014): Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59: 345-352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Janová J. (2014): Crop plan optimization under risk on a farm level in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 60: 123-132.

14. Janová J., Bödeker K., Bingham L., Kindu M., Knoke T. (2024): The role of validation in optimization models for forest management. Annals of Forest Science, 81: 19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Schulte H.D., Armbrecht L., Buerger R., Gauly M., Musshoff O., Hüttel S. (2018): Let the cows graze: An empirical investigation on the trade-off between efficiency and farm animal welfare in milk production. Land Use Policy, 79: 375-385.

16. Sherwin C.M., Richards G.J., Nicol C.J. (2010): Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. British Poultry Science, 51: 488-499.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Simar L., Wilson P.W. (1998): Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44: 49-61.

18. Simar L., Wilson P.W. (2007): Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136: 31-64.

19. Staňková M., Hampel D., Janová J. (2022): Micro-data efficiency evaluation of forest companies: The case of Central Europe. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 43: 441-456.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Turner I., Heidari D., Pelletier N. (2022): Environmental impact mitigation potential of increased resource use efficiency industrial egg production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354: 131743.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Weeks C.A., Lambton S.L., Williams A.G. (2016): Implications for welfare, productivity and sustainability of the variation in reported levels of mortality for laying hen flocks kept in different housing systems: A meta-analysis of ten studies. PLoS One, 11: e0146394.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Wiengarten F., Fan D., Lo C.K., Pagell M. (2017): The differing impacts of operational and financial slack on occupational safety in varying market conditions. Journal of Operations Management, 52: 30-45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. From Tradition to Sustainability: Identifying Value-Added Label Attributes in the Italian Protected Designation of Origin Cheese Market. (2025). Wongprawmas, Rungsaran ; Morea, Enrica ; de Boni, Annalisa ; di Vita, Giuseppe ; Barbieri, Cinzia ; Mora, Cristina.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5891-:d:1688238.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Analysis on Production Efficiency of Laying Hens in China€”Based on the Survey Data of Five Provinces. (2024). Yuhuan, WU ; Fu, Qin.
   In: Journal of Agricultural Science.
   RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:8:p:280.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Enhancing Agricultural Ecological Efficiency in China: An Evolution and Pathways under the Carbon Neutrality Vision. (2024). Liu, Yaqun ; Wang, Xiaochen.
   In: Land.
   RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:187-:d:1333316.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. How to concurrently achieve economic, environmental, and animal welfare performances in French suckler cattle farms. (2024). Veysset, Patrick ; Mysko, Larissa ; Minviel, Jean-Joseph ; Veissier, Isabelle.
   In: Agricultural Systems.
   RePEc:eee:agisys:v:218:y:2024:i:c:s0308521x24001069.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Micro-data efficiency evaluation of agricultural companies: The case of Germany and neighbouring countries. (2024). Janov, Jitka ; Nowag, Kevin.
   In: Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:11:id:190-2024-agricecon.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Are there trade-offs between animal welfare and egg-producing farm efficiency?. (2024). Hampel, David ; Janov, Jitka ; Lichovnkov, Martina ; Matulov, Markta.
   In: Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:10:id:93-2024-agricecon.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Valuing environmental attributes of food products in a polluted environment: what are the preferences of Guadeloupean consumers?. (2024). Angeon, Valerie ; Bazoche, Pascale.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:inrasl:344172.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Comparison of conservation instruments under long-run yield uncertainty and farmer risk aversion. (2023). Armstrong, Shalamar ; Roth, Richard ; Ma, Meilin ; Hughes, Megan N ; Reeling, Carson.
   In: European Review of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:5:p:1685-1714..

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Willingness to pay for credence attributes associated with agri‐food products—Evidence from Canada. (2023). Traore, Ousmane Z ; Tamini, Lota ; Korai, Bernard.
   In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
   RePEc:bla:canjag:v:71:y:2023:i:3-4:p:303-327.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Comment: Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs. (2021). Dakpo, K H.
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:55:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11123-021-00606-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Public preferences for pasture landscapes in Germany—A latent class analysis of a nationwide discrete choice experiment. (2020). Musshoff, Oliver ; Schaak, Henning.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:91:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719306180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Animal welfare and production efficiency in German pork production. (2020). Seifert, Stefan ; Hüttel, Silke ; Huttel, Silke ; Uehleke, Reinhard.
    In: 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020.
    RePEc:ags:gewi20:305600.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Animal welfare and production efficiency in German pork production. (2020). Seifert, Stefan ; Huttel, Silke ; Uehleke, Reinhard.
    In: 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018.
    RePEc:ags:gewi18:305600.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Farm eco-efficiency: Can sustainable intensification make the difference?. (2019). Hüttel, Silke ; Huttel, Silke ; Weltin, Meike.
    In: FORLand Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:forlwp:102019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Considerations on the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Animal-Based Policies. (2019). Tappi, Marco ; Santeramo, Fabio ; Lamonaca, Emilia ; di Gioia, Leonardo.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2316-:d:223762.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Are there trade-offs between animal welfare and egg-producing farm efficiency?. (). Hampel, David ; Matulova, Marketa ; Lichovnikova, Martina ; Janova, Jitka.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:93-2024-agricecon.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 14:12:20 || Missing content? Let us know