create a website

Contingent Thinking and the Sure-Thing Principle: Revisiting Classic Anomalies in the Laboratory#. (2023). Esponda, Ignacio ; Vespa, Emanuel.
In: University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series.
RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt32j4d5z2.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 87

References cited by this document

Cocites: 42

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Mental Models and Learning: The Case of Base-Rate Neglect. (2024). Esponda, Ignacio ; Yuksel, Sevgi ; Vespa, Emanuel.
    In: University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt8cb387t8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. AHN, D. S. AND H. ERGIN (2010): “Framing contingencies,” Econometrica, 78, 655–695.

  2. AHN, D., S. CHOI, D. GALE, AND S. KARIV (2014): “Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment,” Quantitative Economics, 5, 195–223.

  3. AL-NAJJAR, N. I. AND J. WEINSTEIN (2009): “The ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment,” Economics and Philosophy, 25, 249–284.

  4. ALI, S. N., M. MIHM, L. SIGA, AND C. TERGIMAN (2021): “Adverse and Advantageous Selection in the Laboratory,” American Economic Review, 111, 2152–78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. ALLAIS, M. (1953): “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 503–546.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. ANDREONI, J., T. SCHMIDT, AND C. SPRENGER (2014): “Measuring Ambiguity Aversion: Experimental Tests of Subjective Expected Utility,” mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. ARAUJO, F. A., S. W. WANG, AND A. J. WILSON (2021): “The times they are a-Changing: Dynamic Adverse Selection in the Laboratory,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 13, 1–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. BARRON, K., S. HUCK, AND P. JEHIEL (2019): “Everyday econometricians: Selection neglect and overoptimism when learning from others,” Working Paper.

  9. BAYONA, A., J. BRANDTS, AND X. VIVES (2020): “Information frictions and market power: A laboratory study,” Games and Economic Behavior, 122, 354–369.

  10. BAZERMAN, M. H. AND W. F. SAMUELSON (1983): “I won the auction but don’t want the prize,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 618–634.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. BLAVATSKYY, P., A. ORTMANN, AND V. PANCHENKO (2022): “On the experimental robustness of the Allais paradox,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14, 143–63.

  12. BORDALO, P., N. GENNAIOLI, AND A. SHLEIFER (2012): “Salience theory of choice under risk,” The Quarterly journal of economics, 127, 1243–1285.

  13. BRANDTS, J. AND G. CHARNESS (2011): “The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons,” Experimental Economics, 14, 375–398.

  14. CALFORD, E. M. AND T. N. CASON (2021): “Contingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision,” Working Paper.

  15. CAMERER, C. (1995): “Individual Decision Making. Chapter 8 in John Kagel and Al Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics,” .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. CASON, T. N. AND C. R. PLOTT (2014): “Misconceptions and game form recognition: Challenges to theories of revealed preference and framing,” Journal of Political Economy, 122, 1235–1270.

  17. CHARNESS, G. AND D. LEVIN (2009): “The origin of the winner’s curse: a laboratory study,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1, 207–236.

  18. CHEW, S. H. AND W. WANG (2022): “Generalizing Obvious Dominance using the Sure-thing Principle,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. COHEN, M., I. GILBOA, J.-Y. JAFFRAY, AND D. SCHMEIDLER (2000): “An experimental study of updating ambiguous beliefs,” Risk Decision and Policy, 5, 123–133.

  20. COHEN, S. AND S. LI (2022): “Sequential Cursed Equilibrium,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. CROSETTO, P. AND A. FILIPPIN (2013): “The ‘bomb’ risk elicitation task,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47, 31–65.

  22. CROSON, R. T. (1999): “The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 118–133.

  23. CUBITT, R. P. (1996): “Rational dynamic choice and expected utility theory,” Oxford Economic Papers, 48, 1–19.

  24. CUBITT, R., C. STARMER, AND R. SUGDEN (1998): “Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: An experimental investigation,” The Economic Journal, 108, 1362–1380.

  25. DAL BÓ, E., P. DAL BÓ, AND E. EYSTER (2018): “The demand for bad policy when voters underappreciate equilibrium effects,” The Review of Economic Studies, 85, 964–998.

  26. DE CLIPPEL, G. (2022): “Departures from Preference Maximization, Violations of the Sure-Thing Principle, and Relevant Implications,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. DEAN, M. AND P. ORTOLEVA (2015): “Is it all connected? a testing ground for unified theories of behavioral economics phenomena,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. DOMINIAK, A., P. DÜRSCH, AND J.-P. LEFORT (2012): “A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment,” Games and Economic Behavior, 75, 625–638.

  29. ELIAZ, K., D. RAY, AND R. RAZIN (2006): “Choice shifts in groups: A decision-theoretic basis,” The American economic review, 96, 1321–1332.

  30. ENKE, B. (2020): “What you see is all there is,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135, 1363– 1398.

  31. ENKE, B. AND F. ZIMMERMANN (2019): “Correlation neglect in belief formation,” The Review of Economic Studies, 86, 313–332.

  32. ESPONDA, I. AND E. VESPA (2014): “Hypothetical Thinking and Information Extraction in the Laboratory,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 180–202.

  33. EVANS, J. S. B. (2007): Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement, vol. 3, Psychology Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. EYSTER, E. AND G. WEIZSÄCKER (2010): “Correlation neglect in financial decision-making,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. EYSTER, E. AND M. RABIN (2005): “Cursed equilibrium,” Econometrica, 73, 1623–1672.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. FISCHBACHER, U. (2007): “z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments,” Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. FREDERICK, S. (2005): “Cognitive reflection and decision making,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.

  38. FRYDMAN, C. AND M. MORMANN (2016): “The role of salience and attention in choice under risk: An experimental investigation,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. GABAIX, X. (2014): “A sparsity-based model of bounded rationality,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1661–1710.

  40. GENNAIOLI, N. AND A. SHLEIFER (2010): “What comes to mind,” The Quarterly journal of economics, 125, 1399–1433.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. GHIRARDATO, P. (2002): “Revisiting Savage in a conditional world,” Economic theory, 20, 83–92.

  42. GILBOA, I. (2009): Theory of decision under uncertainty, vol. 1, Cambridge university press.

  43. GILBOA, I. AND D. SCHMEIDLER (1995): “Case-based decision theory,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 605–639.

  44. GILBOA, I. AND M. MARINACCI (2011): “Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm,” Chapter, 7, 179–242.

  45. GLAZER, J. AND A. RUBINSTEIN (1996): “An Extensive Game as a Guide for Solving a Normal Game,” Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 32–42.

  46. GREINER, B. (2015): “Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE,” Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114–125.

  47. GUPTA, N., L. RIGOTTI, AND A. WILSON (2021): “The Experimenter’s Dilemma: Inferential Preferences Over Populations,” Working Paper.

  48. HALEVY, Y. (2007): “Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study,” Econometrica, 75, 503–536.

  49. HAMMOND, P. J. (1988): “Consequentialist foundations for expected utility,” Theory and decision, 25, 25–78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. HARSTAD, R. M. (2000): “Dominant strategy adoption and bidders’ experience with pricing rules,” Experimental economics, 3, 261–280.

  51. HOLLER, M. J. (1983): “Do economics students choose rationally? A research note.” Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. HUCK, S. AND W. MÜLLER (2012): “Allais for all: Revisiting the paradox in a large representative sample,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 261–293.

  53. IVANOV, A., D. LEVIN, AND M. NIEDERLE (2010): “Can relaxation of beliefs rationalize the winner’s curse?: an experimental study,” Econometrica, 78, 1435–1452.

  54. KAGEL, J. AND D. LEVIN (2002): Common value auctions and the winner’s curse, Princeton Univ Pr.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. KAGEL, J. H. (1995): “Auctions: A survey of experimental research. John H. Kagel, Alvin E.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. KAGEL, J., R. HARSTAD, AND D. LEVIN (1987): “Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study,” Econometrica, 1275–1304.

  57. KOVŘÍK, J., D. LEVIN, AND T. WANG (2016): “Ellsberg paradox: Ambiguity and complexity aversions compared,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52, 47–64.

  58. LELAND, J. W. (1998): “Similarity judgments in choice under uncertainty: A reinterpretation of the predictions of regret theory,” Management Science, 44, 659–672.

  59. LEVIN, D., J. PECK, AND A. IVANOV (2016): “Separating bayesian updating from nonprobabilistic reasoning: An experimental investigation,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8, 39–60.

  60. LI, S. (2017): “Obviously strategy-proof mechanisms,” American Economic Review, 107, 3257– 87.

  61. LOOMES, G. AND R. SUGDEN (1982): “Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty,” The economic journal, 92, 805–824.

  62. LOUIS, P. (2015): “The barrel of apples game: Contingent thinking, learning from observed actions, and strategic heterogeneity,” .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. MACCRIMMON, K. R. AND S. LARSSON (1979): “Utility theory: Axioms versus paradoxes,” in Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox, Springer, 333–409.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. MACHINA, M. (2008): “Non-Expected Utility Theory. In Steven Durlauf and Lawrence Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,” .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. MACHINA, M. J. (1989): “Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty,” Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1622–1668.

  66. MARTÍNEZ-MARQUINA, A., M. NIEDERLE, AND E. VESPA (2019): “Failures in contingent reasoning: The role of uncertainty,” American Economic Review, 109, 3437–74.

  67. MARTIN, D. AND E. MUNOZ-RODRIGUEZ (2019): “Misperceiving Mechanisms: Imperfect Perception and the Failure to Recognize Dominant Strategies,” .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. MOSER, J. (2019): “Hypothetical thinking and the winner’s curse: an experimental investigation,” Theory and Decision, 87, 17–56.

  69. NEBOUT, A. AND D. DUBOIS (2014): “When Allais meets Ulysses: Dynamic axioms and the common ratio effect,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48, 19–49.

  70. NGANGOUÉ, M. K. AND G. WEIZSÄCKER (2021): “Learning from unrealized versus realized prices,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 13, 174–201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. NICKERSON, R. (2015): Conditional Reasoning: The Unruly Syntactics, Semantics, Thematics, and Pragmatics of “If”, Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. NIELSEN, K. AND J. REHBECK (2022): “When choices are mistakes,” American Economic Review, 112, 2237–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. PIERMONT, E. (2022): “Hypothetical Expected Utility,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. PIERMONT, E. AND P. ZUAZO-GARIN (2022): “Failures of Contingent Thinking,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. REES-JONES, A., R. I. SHORRER, AND C. TERGIMAN (2023): “Correlation Neglect in Studentto -School Matching,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Roth, eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics,” . KAGEL, J. H. AND D. LEVIN (1993): “Independent private value auctions: Bidder behaviour in first-, second-and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders,” The Economic Journal, 103, 868–879.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. SAMET, D. (2015): “The sure-thing principle in epistemic terms,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. SAVAGE, L. J. (1972): The foundations of statistics, Courier Corporation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. SHAFIR, E. AND A. TVERSKY (1992): “Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice,” Cognitive psychology, 24, 449–474.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. SINISCALCHI, M. (2009): “Two out of three ain’t bad: A comment on ‘the ambiguity aversion literature: A critical assessment’,” Economics and Philosophy, 25, 335–356.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. SLOVIC, P. AND A. TVERSKY (1974): “Who accepts Savage’s axiom?” Behavioral science, 19, 368–373.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. STARMER, C. (1992): “Testing new theories of choice under uncertainty using the common consequence effect,” The Review of Economic Studies, 59, 813–830.

  83. STARMER, C. AND R. SUGDEN (1993): “Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects,” Journal of risk and uncertainty, 6, 235–254.

  84. TVERSKY, A. AND D. KAHNEMAN (1981): “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” Science, 211, 453–458.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. WAKKER, P. P. (2001): “Testing and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle,” Econometrica, 69, 1039–1059.

  86. WASON, P. C. (1966): “Reasoning,” New horizons in psychology, Vol. 1, BM Foss ed.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. ZHANG, L. AND D. LEVIN (2017): “Partition Obvious Preference and Mechanism Design: Theory and Experiment,” Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility. (2025). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2403.01421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility. (2024). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Complexity Aversion. (2024). gu, yuan ; Chan, Chao Hung.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2406.18463.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Optimism, overconfidence, and moral hazard. (2024). Sinander, Ludvig.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2304.08343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Adverse selection and bounded rationality: an impossibility theorem. (2023). Yamashita, Takuro ; Murooka, Takeshi.
    In: The Japanese Economic Review.
    RePEc:spr:jecrev:v:74:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s42973-022-00119-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Subjective complexity under uncertainty. (2023). Valenzuela-Stookey, Quitze.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:126:y:2023:i:c:p:76-93.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Contingent Thinking and the Sure-Thing Principle: Revisiting Classic Anomalies in the Laboratory#. (2023). Esponda, Ignacio ; Vespa, Emanuel.
    In: University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt32j4d5z2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Subjective complexity under uncertainty. (2023). Valenzuela-Stookey, Quitze.
    In: Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt4mz932j6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A model of state aggregation. (2022). Burkovskaya, Anastasia.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:73:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s00199-020-01326-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The continuity postulate in economic theory: A deconstruction and an integration. (2022). Uyanık, Metin ; Khan, M. ; Uyanik, Metin.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:101:y:2022:i:c:s0304406822000507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Ambiguity under growing awareness. (2022). Tserenjigmid, Gerelt ; Dominiak, Adam.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:199:y:2022:i:c:s0022053121000739.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Revealed reasoning. (2022). Saponara, Nick.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:199:y:2022:i:c:s0022053120300909.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Framing and insurance choices. (2022). Burkovskaya, Anastasia ; Atalay, Kadir ; Teperski, Adam.
    In: Journal of Risk & Insurance.
    RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:89:y:2022:i:2:p:311-337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Pessimism and optimism towards new discoveries. (2021). Guerdjikova, Ani ; Dominiak, Adam.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:90:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-021-09808-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. An intertemporal model of growing awareness. (2021). Vierø, Marie-Louise ; Viero, Marie-Louise.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:197:y:2021:i:c:s002205312100168x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Fully Bayesian aggregation. (2021). Dietrich, Franz.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:194:y:2021:i:c:s0022053121000727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Multiple priors and comparative ignorance. (2021). Kopylov, Igor.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:191:y:2021:i:c:s0022053120301253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Preferences for partial information and ambiguity. (2020). Li, Jian.
    In: Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:the:publsh:2851.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Comparative Profitability of Product Disclosure Statements. (2020). Burkovskaya, Anastasia ; Li, Jian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:syd:wpaper:2020-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Subjective expected utility with a spectral state space. (2020). Pivato, Marcus.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:69:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s00199-018-01173-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Ambiguity and awareness: a coherent multiple priors model. *. (2020). Quiggin, John ; Grant, Simon ; Guerdjikova, Ani.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02550347.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Description-dependent Choices. (2019). Jullien, Dorian ; Borie, Dino.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01651086.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Subjective contingencies and limited Bayesian updating. (2019). Savochkin, Andrei ; Minardi, Stefania.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:1-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A Characterization of Verifiability and Observability in Contracts. (2018). Dimitri, Nicola.
    In: International Game Theory Review (IGTR).
    RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:20:y:2018:i:02:n:s0219198917500323.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Errors in Probabilistic Reasoning and Judgment Biases. (2018). Benjamin, Daniel.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty. (2018). Lambert-Mogiliansky, Ariane ; Danilov, Vladimir ; Vergopoulos, V.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:84:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-018-9659-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Heuristic Modes of Decision Making and Survival in Financial Markets. (2018). Quiggin, John ; Guerdjikova, Ani.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02086267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Intertemporal Portfolio Choice with Incorrect Beliefs and Aversion to Surprise. (2018). Quiggin, John ; Guerdjikova, Ani.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02086151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Savages theorem under changing awareness. (2018). Dietrich, Franz.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:176:y:2018:i:c:p:1-54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A behavioral definition of unforeseen contingencies. (2018). Kochov, Asen.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:175:y:2018:i:c:p:265-290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Financial complexity and trade. (2018). Galanis, Spyros.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:112:y:2018:i:c:p:219-230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Self-consistency, consistency and cycles in non-partitional knowledge models. (2017). Rodrigues-Neto, José ; Fiorini, Luciana.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:87:y:2017:i:c:p:11-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Context dependent beliefs. (2017). Piermont, Evan.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:71:y:2017:i:c:p:63-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Awareness of unawareness: A theory of decision making in the face of ignorance. (2017). Vierø, Marie-Louise ; Karni, Edi ; Viero, Marie-Louise.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:168:y:2017:i:c:p:301-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Reasonable doubt revisited. (2016). Tsakas, Elias.
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2016017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Savages Theorem Under Changing Awareness. (2016). Dietrich, Franz.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:71306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. All Frames Created Equal are Not Identical: On the Structure of Kahneman and Tverskys Framing Effects. (2016). Jullien, Dorian.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2016-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Awareness-dependent subjective expected utility. (2013). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: International Journal of Game Theory.
    RePEc:spr:jogath:v:42:y:2013:i:3:p:725-753.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Expanding state space and extension of beliefs. (2012). Hayashi, Takashi.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:73:y:2012:i:4:p:591-604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Framing contingencies in contracts. (2011). Zhao, Xiaojian.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:61:y:2011:i:1:p:31-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Awareness-Dependent Subjective Expected Utility. (2011). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Revealed Unawareness. (2010). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 21:00:17 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.