AHN, D. S. AND H. ERGIN (2010): âFraming contingencies,â Econometrica, 78, 655â695.
AHN, D., S. CHOI, D. GALE, AND S. KARIV (2014): âEstimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment,â Quantitative Economics, 5, 195â223.
AL-NAJJAR, N. I. AND J. WEINSTEIN (2009): âThe ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment,â Economics and Philosophy, 25, 249â284.
- ALI, S. N., M. MIHM, L. SIGA, AND C. TERGIMAN (2021): âAdverse and Advantageous Selection in the Laboratory,â American Economic Review, 111, 2152â78.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ALLAIS, M. (1953): âLe comportement de lâhomme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de lâécole américaine,â Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 503â546.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ANDREONI, J., T. SCHMIDT, AND C. SPRENGER (2014): âMeasuring Ambiguity Aversion: Experimental Tests of Subjective Expected Utility,â mimeo.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ARAUJO, F. A., S. W. WANG, AND A. J. WILSON (2021): âThe times they are a-Changing: Dynamic Adverse Selection in the Laboratory,â American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 13, 1â22.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
BARRON, K., S. HUCK, AND P. JEHIEL (2019): âEveryday econometricians: Selection neglect and overoptimism when learning from others,â Working Paper.
BAYONA, A., J. BRANDTS, AND X. VIVES (2020): âInformation frictions and market power: A laboratory study,â Games and Economic Behavior, 122, 354â369.
- BAZERMAN, M. H. AND W. F. SAMUELSON (1983): âI won the auction but donât want the prize,â Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 618â634.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
BLAVATSKYY, P., A. ORTMANN, AND V. PANCHENKO (2022): âOn the experimental robustness of the Allais paradox,â American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14, 143â63.
BORDALO, P., N. GENNAIOLI, AND A. SHLEIFER (2012): âSalience theory of choice under risk,â The Quarterly journal of economics, 127, 1243â1285.
BRANDTS, J. AND G. CHARNESS (2011): âThe strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons,â Experimental Economics, 14, 375â398.
CALFORD, E. M. AND T. N. CASON (2021): âContingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision,â Working Paper.
- CAMERER, C. (1995): âIndividual Decision Making. Chapter 8 in John Kagel and Al Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics,â .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
CASON, T. N. AND C. R. PLOTT (2014): âMisconceptions and game form recognition: Challenges to theories of revealed preference and framing,â Journal of Political Economy, 122, 1235â1270.
CHARNESS, G. AND D. LEVIN (2009): âThe origin of the winnerâs curse: a laboratory study,â American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1, 207â236.
- CHEW, S. H. AND W. WANG (2022): âGeneralizing Obvious Dominance using the Sure-thing Principle,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
COHEN, M., I. GILBOA, J.-Y. JAFFRAY, AND D. SCHMEIDLER (2000): âAn experimental study of updating ambiguous beliefs,â Risk Decision and Policy, 5, 123â133.
- COHEN, S. AND S. LI (2022): âSequential Cursed Equilibrium,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
CROSETTO, P. AND A. FILIPPIN (2013): âThe âbombâ risk elicitation task,â Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47, 31â65.
CROSON, R. T. (1999): âThe disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games,â Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 118â133.
CUBITT, R. P. (1996): âRational dynamic choice and expected utility theory,â Oxford Economic Papers, 48, 1â19.
CUBITT, R., C. STARMER, AND R. SUGDEN (1998): âDynamic choice and the common ratio effect: An experimental investigation,â The Economic Journal, 108, 1362â1380.
DAL BÃ, E., P. DAL BÃ, AND E. EYSTER (2018): âThe demand for bad policy when voters underappreciate equilibrium effects,â The Review of Economic Studies, 85, 964â998.
- DE CLIPPEL, G. (2022): âDepartures from Preference Maximization, Violations of the Sure-Thing Principle, and Relevant Implications,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- DEAN, M. AND P. ORTOLEVA (2015): âIs it all connected? a testing ground for unified theories of behavioral economics phenomena,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
DOMINIAK, A., P. DÃRSCH, AND J.-P. LEFORT (2012): âA dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment,â Games and Economic Behavior, 75, 625â638.
ELIAZ, K., D. RAY, AND R. RAZIN (2006): âChoice shifts in groups: A decision-theoretic basis,â The American economic review, 96, 1321â1332.
ENKE, B. (2020): âWhat you see is all there is,â The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135, 1363â 1398.
ENKE, B. AND F. ZIMMERMANN (2019): âCorrelation neglect in belief formation,â The Review of Economic Studies, 86, 313â332.
ESPONDA, I. AND E. VESPA (2014): âHypothetical Thinking and Information Extraction in the Laboratory,â American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 180â202.
- EVANS, J. S. B. (2007): Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement, vol. 3, Psychology Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- EYSTER, E. AND G. WEIZSÃCKER (2010): âCorrelation neglect in financial decision-making,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- EYSTER, E. AND M. RABIN (2005): âCursed equilibrium,â Econometrica, 73, 1623â1672.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- FISCHBACHER, U. (2007): âz-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments,â Experimental Economics, 10, 171â178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
FREDERICK, S. (2005): âCognitive reflection and decision making,â The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25â42.
- FRYDMAN, C. AND M. MORMANN (2016): âThe role of salience and attention in choice under risk: An experimental investigation,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
GABAIX, X. (2014): âA sparsity-based model of bounded rationality,â The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1661â1710.
- GENNAIOLI, N. AND A. SHLEIFER (2010): âWhat comes to mind,â The Quarterly journal of economics, 125, 1399â1433.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
GHIRARDATO, P. (2002): âRevisiting Savage in a conditional world,â Economic theory, 20, 83â92.
GILBOA, I. (2009): Theory of decision under uncertainty, vol. 1, Cambridge university press.
GILBOA, I. AND D. SCHMEIDLER (1995): âCase-based decision theory,â The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 605â639.
GILBOA, I. AND M. MARINACCI (2011): âAmbiguity and the Bayesian paradigm,â Chapter, 7, 179â242.
GLAZER, J. AND A. RUBINSTEIN (1996): âAn Extensive Game as a Guide for Solving a Normal Game,â Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 32â42.
GREINER, B. (2015): âSubject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE,â Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114â125.
GUPTA, N., L. RIGOTTI, AND A. WILSON (2021): âThe Experimenterâs Dilemma: Inferential Preferences Over Populations,â Working Paper.
HALEVY, Y. (2007): âEllsberg revisited: An experimental study,â Econometrica, 75, 503â536.
- HAMMOND, P. J. (1988): âConsequentialist foundations for expected utility,â Theory and decision, 25, 25â78.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
HARSTAD, R. M. (2000): âDominant strategy adoption and biddersâ experience with pricing rules,â Experimental economics, 3, 261â280.
- HOLLER, M. J. (1983): âDo economics students choose rationally? A research note.â Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
HUCK, S. AND W. MÃLLER (2012): âAllais for all: Revisiting the paradox in a large representative sample,â Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 261â293.
IVANOV, A., D. LEVIN, AND M. NIEDERLE (2010): âCan relaxation of beliefs rationalize the winnerâs curse?: an experimental study,â Econometrica, 78, 1435â1452.
- KAGEL, J. AND D. LEVIN (2002): Common value auctions and the winnerâs curse, Princeton Univ Pr.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- KAGEL, J. H. (1995): âAuctions: A survey of experimental research. John H. Kagel, Alvin E.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
KAGEL, J., R. HARSTAD, AND D. LEVIN (1987): âInformation impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study,â Econometrica, 1275â1304.
KOVRÌÃK, J., D. LEVIN, AND T. WANG (2016): âEllsberg paradox: Ambiguity and complexity aversions compared,â Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52, 47â64.
LELAND, J. W. (1998): âSimilarity judgments in choice under uncertainty: A reinterpretation of the predictions of regret theory,â Management Science, 44, 659â672.
LEVIN, D., J. PECK, AND A. IVANOV (2016): âSeparating bayesian updating from nonprobabilistic reasoning: An experimental investigation,â American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8, 39â60.
LI, S. (2017): âObviously strategy-proof mechanisms,â American Economic Review, 107, 3257â 87.
LOOMES, G. AND R. SUGDEN (1982): âRegret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty,â The economic journal, 92, 805â824.
- LOUIS, P. (2015): âThe barrel of apples game: Contingent thinking, learning from observed actions, and strategic heterogeneity,â .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- MACCRIMMON, K. R. AND S. LARSSON (1979): âUtility theory: Axioms versus paradoxes,â in Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox, Springer, 333â409.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- MACHINA, M. (2008): âNon-Expected Utility Theory. In Steven Durlauf and Lawrence Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,â .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
MACHINA, M. J. (1989): âDynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty,â Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1622â1668.
MARTÃNEZ-MARQUINA, A., M. NIEDERLE, AND E. VESPA (2019): âFailures in contingent reasoning: The role of uncertainty,â American Economic Review, 109, 3437â74.
- MARTIN, D. AND E. MUNOZ-RODRIGUEZ (2019): âMisperceiving Mechanisms: Imperfect Perception and the Failure to Recognize Dominant Strategies,â .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
MOSER, J. (2019): âHypothetical thinking and the winnerâs curse: an experimental investigation,â Theory and Decision, 87, 17â56.
NEBOUT, A. AND D. DUBOIS (2014): âWhen Allais meets Ulysses: Dynamic axioms and the common ratio effect,â Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48, 19â49.
- NGANGOUÃ, M. K. AND G. WEIZSÃCKER (2021): âLearning from unrealized versus realized prices,â American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 13, 174â201.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- NICKERSON, R. (2015): Conditional Reasoning: The Unruly Syntactics, Semantics, Thematics, and Pragmatics of âIfâ, Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- NIELSEN, K. AND J. REHBECK (2022): âWhen choices are mistakes,â American Economic Review, 112, 2237â68.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- PIERMONT, E. (2022): âHypothetical Expected Utility,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- PIERMONT, E. AND P. ZUAZO-GARIN (2022): âFailures of Contingent Thinking,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- REES-JONES, A., R. I. SHORRER, AND C. TERGIMAN (2023): âCorrelation Neglect in Studentto -School Matching,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Roth, eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics,â . KAGEL, J. H. AND D. LEVIN (1993): âIndependent private value auctions: Bidder behaviour in first-, second-and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders,â The Economic Journal, 103, 868â879.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SAMET, D. (2015): âThe sure-thing principle in epistemic terms,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SAVAGE, L. J. (1972): The foundations of statistics, Courier Corporation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SHAFIR, E. AND A. TVERSKY (1992): âThinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice,â Cognitive psychology, 24, 449â474.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SINISCALCHI, M. (2009): âTwo out of three ainât bad: A comment on âthe ambiguity aversion literature: A critical assessmentâ,â Economics and Philosophy, 25, 335â356.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SLOVIC, P. AND A. TVERSKY (1974): âWho accepts Savageâs axiom?â Behavioral science, 19, 368â373.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
STARMER, C. (1992): âTesting new theories of choice under uncertainty using the common consequence effect,â The Review of Economic Studies, 59, 813â830.
STARMER, C. AND R. SUGDEN (1993): âTesting for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects,â Journal of risk and uncertainty, 6, 235â254.
- TVERSKY, A. AND D. KAHNEMAN (1981): âThe framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,â Science, 211, 453â458.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
WAKKER, P. P. (2001): âTesting and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle,â Econometrica, 69, 1039â1059.
- WASON, P. C. (1966): âReasoning,â New horizons in psychology, Vol. 1, BM Foss ed.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ZHANG, L. AND D. LEVIN (2017): âPartition Obvious Preference and Mechanism Design: Theory and Experiment,â Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now