create a website

Cooperation in a Company: A Large-Scale Experiment. (2020). Schwieren, Christiane ; Kocher, Martin ; Deversi, Marvin.
In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8190.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 67

References cited by this document

Cocites: 29

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Cooperation in the Workplace. (2025). Ho, Hoa ; Castro, Silvia ; Mickeler, Maren.
    In: Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:rco:dpaper:531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Observational evidence that economic reciprocity pervades self-organized food co-operatives. (2022). Waring, Timothy ; Lange, Taylor Z.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:edu6m_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Team Incentives, Social Cohesion, and Performance: A Natural Field Experiment. (2022). Dur, Robert ; Delfgaauw, Josse ; Onemu, Oke ; Sol, Joeri.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:1:p:230-256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Personal Growth under Stress: Mediating Effects of Unit Cohesion and Leadership during Mandatory Military Training. (2022). Bekesiene, Svajone ; Smaliukiene, Rasa.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10389-:d:893651.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Team Incentives, Social Cohesion, and Performance: A Natural Field Experiment. (2020). Dur, Robert ; Delfgaauw, Josse ; Onemu, Oke ; Sol, Joeri.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. , , and , “Field experiments with firms,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2011, 25 (3), pp. 63–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. , , and , “Team incentives: Evidence from a firm level experiment,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2013, 11 (5), pp. 1079–1114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. , , Mayo Fuster Morell, and Jérôme Hergueux, “Cooperation in a peer production economy experimental evidence from wikipedia,” Working Paper, 2013.

  4. , Andreas Leibbrandt, and John A List, “Ode to the sea: Workplace organizations and norms of cooperation,” Economic Journal, 2016, 126 (595), pp. 1856–1883.

  5. , Daniele Nosenzo, Jon Anderson, Matthew Bombyk, Derek Ganzhorn, Lorenz Götte, and Aldo Rustichini, “Lab measures of other-regarding preferences can predict some related on-the-job behavior: Evidence from a large scale field experiment,” Working Paper, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. , Felix Kölle, and Simone Quercia, “Reciprocity and the tragedies of maintaining and providing the commons,” Nature Human Behaviour, 2017, 1 (9), pp. 650–656.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. , Herbert Gintis, and Melissa Osborne, “Incentive-enhancing preferences: Personality, behavior, and earnings,” American Economic Review, 2001, 91 (2), pp. 155–158.

  8. , Jeffrey Carpenter, and Lorenz Goette, “Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009, 70 (3), pp. 458–469.

  9. , Simon Gächter, and Ernst Fehr, “Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment,” Economics Letters, 2001, 71 (3), pp. 397–404.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. , The shift: The future of work is already here, HarperCollins UK, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. , Ty Turley, Andreas Kontoleon, Erwin Bulte, and John List, “Exploring whether behavior in context-free experiments is predictive of behavior in the field: Evidence from lab and field experiments in rural Sierra Leone,” Economics Letters, 2012, 114 (3), pp. 308–311.

  12. Algan, Yann, Yochai Benkler, Emeric Henry, and Jérôme Hergueux, “Social motives and the organization of production: Experimental evidence from open source software,” Working Paper, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Alpizar, Francisco, Fredrik Carlsson, and Olof Johansson-Stenman, “Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica,” Journal of Public Economics, 2008, 92 (5-6), pp. 1047–1060.

  14. Ambrus, Attila and Parag Pathak, “Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments, ” Journal of Public Economics, 2011, 95 (7-8), pp. 500–512.

  15. Anderson, Lisa, Jennifer Mellor, and Jeffrey Milyo, “Social capital and contributions in a public-goods experiment,” American Economic Review, 2004, 94 (2), pp. 373–376.

  16. Ashforth, Blake and Fred Mael, “Social identity theory and the organization,” Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14 (1), pp. 20–39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Bandiera, Oriana, Iwan Barankay, and Imran Rasul, “Cooperation in collective action,” Economics of Transition, 2005, 13 (3), pp. 473–498.

  18. Barr, Abigail and Pieter Serneels, “Reciprocity in the workplace,” Experimental Economics, 2009, 12 (1), pp. 99–112.

  19. Barr, Abigal, Jean Ensminger, and Jeffrey Johnson, “Social networks and trust in crosscultural economic experiments,” in “Whom can we trust?,” New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Beersma, Bianca, John Hollenbeck, Stephen Humphrey, Henry Moon, Donald Conlon, and Daniel Ilgen, “Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach,” Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46 (5), pp. 572–590.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Benz, Matthias and Stephan Meier, “Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from donations,” Experimental Economics, 2008, 11 (3), pp. 268–281.

  22. Bieberstein, Frauke Von, Jonas Gehrlein, and Anna Güntner, “Teamwork revisited: Social preferences and knowledge acquisition in the field,” Journal of Business Economics, 2020, pp. 1–24.

  23. Bowles, Samuel, “Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions,” Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, 36 (1), pp. 75–111.

  24. Burks, Stephen and Erin Krupka, “A multimethod approach to identifying norms and normative expectations within a corporate hierarchy: Evidence from the financial services industry,” Management Science, 2012, 58 (1), pp. 203–217.

  25. Cardenas, Juan Camilo and Jeffrey Carpenter, “Three themes on field experiments and economic development,” in “Field Experiments in Economics,” JAI Press, Greenwich, 2005, pp. 71–124.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Cardenas, Juan-Camilo, “Real wealth and experimental cooperation: Experiments in the field lab,” Journal of Development Economics, 2003, 70 (2), pp. 263–289.

  27. Carpenter, Jeffrey and Erika Seki, “Do social preferences increase productivity? Field experimental evidence from fishermen in Toyama Bay,” Economic Inquiry, 2011, 49 (2), pp. 612–630.

  28. Charness, Gary and Marie-Claire Villeval, “Cooperation and competition in intergenerational experiments in the field and the laboratory,” American Economic Review, 2009, 99 (3), pp. 956–978.

  29. Chaudhuri, Ananish, “Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature,” Experimental Economics, 2011, 14 (1), pp. 47–83.

  30. Cohn, Alain, Ernst Fehr, and Michel André Maréchal, “Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry,” Nature, 2014, 516 (7529), pp. 86–89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Croson, Rachel and Jen Yue Shang, “The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions,” Experimental Economics, 2008, 11 (3), pp. 221–233.

  32. Deversi, Marvin, Martin Kocher, Robert Schmidt, Christoph Schweighofer, and Christiane Schwieren, “Norms of cooperation in a company,” Working Paper, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Dirks, Kurt, “The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84 (3), pp. 445–455.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Dohmen, Thomas and Armin Falk, “Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender,” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (2), pp. 556–90.

  35. Englmaier, Florian and Georg Gebhardt, “Social dilemmas in the laboratory and in the field,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2016, 128, pp. 85–96.

  36. Falk, Armin and James Heckman, “Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences,” Science, 2009, 326 (5952), pp. 535–538.

  37. Fehr, Ernst, “Behavioral foundations of corporate culture,” UBS Center Public Paper No. 7, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Fischbacher, Urs and Simon Gächter, “Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments,” American Economic Review, 2010, 100 (1), pp. 541–56.

  39. Frey, Bruno and Stephan Meier, “Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing” conditional cooperation” in a field experiment,” American Economic Review, 2004, 94 (5), pp. 1717–1722.

  40. Gächter, Simon and Elke Renner, “The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments,” Experimental Economics, 2010, 13 (3), pp. 364–377.

  41. Galizzi, Matteo and Daniel Navarro-Martı́nez, “On the external validity of social preference games: A systematic lab-field study,” Management Science, 2019, 65 (3), pp. 976– 1002.

  42. Gittell, Jody Hoffer, “Organizing work to support relational co-ordination,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000, 11 (3), pp. 517–539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Gneezy, Uri and Alex Imas, “Lab in the field: Measuring preferences in the wild,” in “Handbook of Economic Field Experiments,” Vol. 1, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 439–464.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Grant, Adam M, Give and take: A revolutionary approach to success, Penguin, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Gratton, Lynda, “How to foster a cooperative culture,” Harvard Business Review, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Hamilton, Barton, Jack Nickerson, and Hideo Owan, “Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation, ” Journal of Political Economy, 2003, 111 (3), pp. 465–497.

  47. Harrison, Glenn and John List, “Field experiments,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 42 (4), pp. 1009–1055.

  48. Holmstrom, Bengt, “Moral hazard in teams,” Bell Journal of Economics, 1982, pp. 324–340.

  49. Houser, Daniel, Erte Xiao, Kevin McCabe, and Vernon Smith, “When punishment fails: Research on sanctions, intentions and non-cooperation,” Games and Economic Behavior, 2008, 62 (2), pp. 509–532.

  50. Itoh, Hideshi, “Incentives to help in multi-agent situations,” Econometrica, 1991, pp. 611– 636.

  51. Kandel, Eugene and Edward Lazear, “Peer pressure and partnerships,” Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100 (4), pp. 801–817.

  52. Kocher, Martin, Peter Martinsson, Dominik Matzat, and Conny Wollbrant, “The role of beliefs, trust, and risk in contributions to a public good,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 2015, 51, pp. 236–244.

  53. Kosfeld, Michael and Ferdinand Von Siemens, “Competition, cooperation, and corporate culture,” RAND Journal of Economics, 2011, 42 (1), pp. 23–43.

  54. Ledyard, John, “Public goods: A survey of experimental research,” Handbook of Experimental Economics, 1995, Vol. 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Leibbrandt, Andreas, “Are social preferences related to market performance?,” Experimental Economics, 2012, 15 (4), pp. 589–603.

  56. Levitt, Steven and John List, “What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007, 21 (2), pp. 153–174.

  57. List, John A and David Lucking-Reiley, “The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign,” Journal of Political Economy, 2002, 110 (1), pp. 215–233.

  58. Newby, Jennifer and Rupert Klein, “Competitiveness reconceptualized: Psychometric development of the competitiveness orientation measure as a unified measure of trait competitiveness,” The Psychological Record, 2014, 64 (4), pp. 879–895.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Nikiforakis, Nikos, “Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?,” Journal of Public Economics, 2008, 92 (1-2), pp. 91–112.

  60. Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Rammstedt, Beatrice, Christoph Kemper, Mira Céline Klein, Constanze Beierlein, and Anastassiya Kovaleva, “Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der fünf Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit: Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10),” Methoden, Daten, Analysen, 2013, 7 (2), pp. 233–249.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Rosen, Sherwin, “The theory of equalizing differences,” Handbook of Labor Economics, 1986, 1, pp. 641–692.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Ruff, Christian and Ernst Fehr, “The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2014, 15 (8), pp. 549–562.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Rustagi, Devesh, Stefanie Engel, and Michael Kosfeld, “Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management,” Science, 2010, 330 (6006), pp. 961–965.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Schulz, Peter and Wolff Schlotz, “Trierer Inventar zur Erfassung von chronischem Sre (TICS): Skalenkonstruktion, teststatistische Überprüfung und Validierung der Skala Arbeitsüberlastung.,” Diagnostica, 1999, pp. 8–19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Stoop, Jan, Charles Noussair, and Daan Van Soest, “From the lab to the field: Cooperation among fishermen,” Journal of Political Economy, 2012, 120 (6), pp. 1027–1056.

  67. Voors, Maarten, Erwin Bulte, Andreas Kontoleon, John List, and Ty Turley, “Using artefactual field experiments to learn about the incentives for sustainable forest use in developing economies,” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (3), pp. 329–33.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Quels facteurs expliquent la faible coopération en horticulture ?. (2023). Blondel, Serge ; Noet, Ngoc-Thao.
    In: TEPP Research Report.
    RePEc:tep:tepprr:rr23-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Knowledge diffusion and morality: Why do we freely share valuable information with Strangers?. (2023). Ayoubi, Charles ; Thurm, Boris.
    In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
    RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:75-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Externalities in knowledge production: evidence from a randomized field experiment. (2022). Slivko, Olga ; Hinnosaar, Marit ; Kummer, Michael E.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-021-09730-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Teamwork revisited: social preferences and knowledge acquisition in the field. (2020). Gehrlein, Jonas ; Bieberstein, Frauke ; Guntner, Anna.
    In: Journal of Business Economics.
    RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:90:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11573-020-00966-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Collective action and other-regarding behavior: an assessment of games vs reality in Thailand. (2020). Boonmanunt, Suparee ; Jarungrattanapong, Rawadee.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:22:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10018-020-00266-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Knowledge Diffusion and Morality: Why do we Freely Share Valuable Information with Strangers?. (2020). Ayoubi, Charles ; Thurm, Boris.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:78mua.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. What Makes Geeks Tick? A Study of Stack Overflow Careers. (2020). Cabral, Luis ; Nian, Tingting ; Xu, Lei.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:2:p:587-604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Unemployment and Digital Public Goods Contribution. (2020). Slivko, Olga ; Zhang, Xiaoquan ; Kummer, Michael.
    In: Information Systems Research.
    RePEc:inm:orisre:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:801-819.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Cooperation in a Company: A Large-Scale Experiment. (2020). Schwieren, Christiane ; Kocher, Martin ; Deversi, Marvin.
    In: IHS Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ihs:ihswps:15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Cooperation in a Company: A Large-Scale Experiment. (2020). Schwieren, Christiane ; Kocher, Martin ; Deversi, Marvin.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Voluntary contributions of time: Time-based incentives in a linear public goods game. (2019). Jouxtel, Justine.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:75:y:2019:i:pa:s0167487018303350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from Wikipedia. (2019). Hinnosaar, Marit.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:163:y:2019:i:c:p:262-276.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Measuring image concern. (2019). Henry, Emeric ; Sonntag, Jan.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:160:y:2019:i:c:p:19-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Trust and its determinants. (2018). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Putterman, Louis ; MURTIN, Fabrice ; Grimalda, Gianluca ; Algan, Yann ; Siegerink, Vincent ; Kim, Soonhee ; Gonzalez, Santiago ; Lee, David ; Boarini, Romina ; Smith, Conal ; Aassve, Arnstein ; Hortalavallve, Rafael ; Lonti, Zsuzsanna ; Fleischer, Lara.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/h44c7ona088fb5o9b5dq3nt9u.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Do open online projects create social norms?. (2018). Jullien, Nicolas ; Dejean, Sylvain ; Nguyen, Godefroy Dang.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01547505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Economic downturn and volunteering: Do economic crises affect content generation on Wikipedia?. (2017). Slivko, Olga ; Zhang, Michael ; Kummer, Michael.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:15078r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Ideological Segregation among Online Collaborators: Evidence from Wikipedians. (2017). Greenstein, Shane ; Gu, Yuan ; Zhu, Feng.
    In: Harvard Business School Working Papers.
    RePEc:hbs:wpaper:17-028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Economic Downturn and Volunteering: Do Economic Crises Affect Content Generation on Wikipedia?. (2016). Slivko, Olga ; Zhang, Michael ; Kummer, Michael.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145698.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Centrality and content creation in networks - The case of economic topics on German wikipedia. (2016). Saam, Marianne ; Kummer, Michael E ; Halatchliyski, Iassen ; Giorgidze, George .
    In: Information Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:36:y:2016:i:c:p:36-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Economic downturn and volunteering: Do economic crises affect content generation on Wikipedia?. (2015). Slivko, Olga ; Zhang, Michael ; Kummer, Michael.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:15078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Peer effects in collaborative content generation: The evidence from German Wikipedia. (2015). Slivko, Olga.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14128r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Measuring Image Concern. (2015). Henry, Emeric ; Sonntag, Jan.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1bq1k745nc834o1mcjvbqevsoq.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Measuring Image Concern. (2015). Sonntag, Jan ; Henry, Emeric.
    In: SciencePo Working papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpspec:hal-03607657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Measuring Image Concern. (2015). Henry, Emeric ; Sonntag, Jan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03607657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Measuring Image Concern. (2015). Henry, Emeric ; Sonntag, Jan.
    In: SciencePo Working papers Main.
    RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03607657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Measuring image concerns. (2015). Henry, Emeric ; Sonntag, Jan.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10831.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Gender Inequality in New Media: Evidence from Wikipedia. (2015). Hinnosaar, Marit.
    In: Carlo Alberto Notebooks.
    RePEc:cca:wpaper:411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Peer effects in collaborative content generation: The evidence from German Wikipedia. (2014). Slivko, Olga.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Social preferences are stable over long periods of time. (2014). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Nam, Pham Khanh.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:117:y:2014:i:c:p:104-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 20:48:07 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.