1. Macroeconomic effects of green recovery programs. (2024). Schratzenstaller, Margit ; Köppl, Angela ; Kppl, Angela.
   In: Eurasian Economic Review.
   RePEc:spr:eurase:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40822-023-00250-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Toward the attainment of climate-smart PPP infrastructure projects: a critical review and recommendations. (2024). Babon-Ayeng, Prosper ; Akomea-Frimpong, Isaac ; Pariafsai, Fatemeh ; Agyekum, Amma Kyewaa ; Amoakwa, Alexander Baah.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03464-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Does COVID-19 Help or Harm the Climate? Modelling Long-run Emissions under Climate and Stimulus Policies. (2023). Zeppini, Paolo ; van den Bergh, Jeroen.
   In: GREDEG Working Papers.
   RePEc:gre:wpaper:2023-09.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Macroeconomic Effects of Green Recovery Programmes. Conceptual Framing and a Review of the Empirical Literature. (2022). Schratzenstaller, Margit ; Köppl, Angela ; Koppl, Angela.
   In: WIFO Working Papers.
   RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2022:i:646.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. COVID-19 Research and Policy Analysis: Contributions from Environmental Economists. (2022). Shogren, Jason ; Finnoff, David ; Cherry, Todd ; Newbold, Stephen C ; Ashworth, Madison ; Thunstrom, Linda.
   In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
   RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/717732.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Climate concern and policy acceptance before and after COVID-19. (2022). van den Bergh, Jeroen ; Savin, Ivan ; Drews, Stefan ; Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:199:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922001690.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Fossil fuels, climate change, and the COVID-19 crisis: pathways for a just and green post-pandemic recovery. (2021). Culbert, Vance ; le Billon, Philippe ; Lujala, Paivi ; Singh, Devyani ; Kristoffersen, Berit.
   In: Climate Policy.
   RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:10:p:1347-1356.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Building Back Better in Small Island Developing States in the Pacific: Initial Insights from the BinD Model of Disaster Risk Management Policy Options in Fiji. (2021). Naqvi, Asjad ; Dunz, Nepomuk ; Shiiba, Nagisa ; Mochizuki, Junko ; Tanaka, Hajime.
   In: ADBI Working Papers.
   RePEc:ris:adbiwp:1290.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The Pandemic, The Climate, and Productivity. (2021). Lovell, C. ; C. A. K. Lovell, .
   In: CEPA Working Papers Series.
   RePEc:qld:uqcepa:165.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Transforming the COVID-19 Threat into an Opportunity: The Pandemic as a Stage to the Sustainable Economy. (2021). Duca, Ioana ; Cretan, Georgiana ; Gherghina, Rodica ; Grecu, Robert-Adrian ; Postole, Mirela Anca ; Oncioiu, Ionica ; Georgescu, Georgiana Camelia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2088-:d:499956.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Can We Have Our Cake and Eat It? A Review of the Debate on Green Recovery from the COVID-19 Crisis. (2021). de Gooyert, Vincent ; Gusheva, Ema.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:874-:d:481671.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Towards a Successful Post COVID-19 Transition of Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning in Complex Sustainability Science Research-to-Policy Projects. (2021). Tsusaka, Takuji ; Szabo, Sylvia ; Burgess, Neil D ; Couto, Matheus ; Runsten, Lisen ; Park, Kwang Soon ; Kangile, Joseph Rajabu ; Nhau, Brighton ; Payne, Tanya.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:387-:d:474492.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Mobilising urban knowledge in an infodemic: Urban observatories, sustainable development and the COVID-19 crisis. (2021). Butcher, Stephanie ; Acuto, Michele ; Washbourne, Carla-Leanne ; Dickey, Ariana.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:140:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x20304228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Sozial gerechte Wege aus der Klimakrise. (2021). Listed, No Authors.
    In: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG.
    RePEc:clr:wugarc:y:2021v:47i:2p:155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Security and Income in Developing Countries of Stakeholders: A Case Study of Rice Value Chain Actors. (2021). , Yergo ; Aboudou, Rachidi ; Mujawamariya, Gaudiose ; Arouna, Aminou.
    In: 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual.
    RePEc:ags:iaae21:315297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation. (2020). Mattauch, Linus ; Klenert, David ; Funke, Franziska ; Ocallaghan, Brian.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:76:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-020-00453-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. COVID-19 and Climate Change: A Tale of Two Global Problems. (2020). Manzano, Baltasar ; Galeotti, Marzio ; Fuentes, Rolando ; Lanza, Alessandro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8560-:d:429062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. A key IT infrastructure investment is 5G. 5G will enable remote controlling machines and robots from a distance which could have an impact in many areas ranging from mines to medical surgery (Lema et al., 2017). The 5G technology saves energy by streamlining the control of radio signals and by transferring only what is really needed – no superfluous system information needs to be handled. In smart cities, public transport and other means of transportation can be adapted to external circumstances and to people’s intentions. The same applies to water consumption, waste management and other community services.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Acemoglu, D. and J.A. Robinson, 2013. “Economics versus politics: Pitfalls of policy advice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(2): 173-192.

3. Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn and D. Hemous, 2012. “The environment and directed technical change.” American Economic Review 102(1): 131-66.

4. Adams-Prassl, A., T. Boneva, M. Golin and C. Rauh, 2020. “The large and unequal impact of COVID-19 on workers.” VoxEU, April 8th. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/large-andunequal -impact-coronavirus-workers.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Alan, S., K. Atalay and T.F. Crossley, 2015. “Do the Rich Save More? Evidence from Canada.” Review of Income and Wealth 61(4): 739-758.

6. Aleksandrowicz, L., R. Green, E.J. Joy, P. Smith and A. Haines, 2016. “The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review.” PLoS ONE 11(11).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Andersen, A.L., E.T. Hansen, N. Johannesen, and A. Sheridan, 2020. Pandemic, shutdown and consumer spending: Lessons from Scandinavian policy responses to COVID-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04630.

8. Another concern could be that carbon taxes could lead to relocation of production to areas with laxer environmental standards—the pollution haven effect. The evidence for this channel is mixed (Eskeland and Harrison, 2002; List et al., 2004). In the long run, whereby input mixes are more flexible, increased carbon taxes most probably shift production towards other inputs such as labor. We conclude that the direct effect of a carbon tax on the coronavirus crisis is ambiguous. Most importantly, however, this is no longer the case if the carbon-tax reform is revenue neutral.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. As long as the quantities involved are sufficiently large, such a policy can give governments fiscal space to tackle the impacts of the crisis, and thus the policy can be effective in fighting the coronavirus crisis. However, in the eurozone, the monetization of member state government debt is a politically touchy issue (Yashiv, 2020) and thus any program of mutualizing risks should arguably be conducted transparently, via explicit fiscal transfers or mutualized debt (Blanchard and PisaniFerry, 2020).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Azevedo, D., Wolff, H., Yamazaki, A 2019. “Do carbon taxes kill jobs? Firm-level evidence from British Columbia”, Clean Economy Working Paper Series, 2019/WP 18-08.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Baghai, R.P., R.C. Silva and L. Ye, 2018. “Teams and bankruptcy.” CEPR Discussion Paper DP13198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Bajzelj, B., K.S. Richards, J.M. Allwood, P. Smith, J.S. Dennis, E. Curmi and C.A. Gilligan, 2014. “Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation.” Nature Climate Change 4(10): 924.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Barrage, L., 2019. “Optimal Dynamic Carbon Taxes in a Climate-Economy Model with Distortionary Fiscal Policy.” Review of Economic Studies 87(1): 1-39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Barrero, J.M., N. Bloom and S.J. Davis, 2020. “COVID-19 Is Also a Reallocation Shock.” University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2020-59. 21 Bastin, J.F., Y. Finegold, C. Garcia, D. Mollicone, M. Rezende, D. Routh, C.M. Zohner and T.W. Crowther, 2019. “The global tree restoration potential.” Science 365(6448): 76-79.

15. Becker, B., U. Hege, and P. Mella-Barral, 2020. “Corporate debt burdens threaten economic recovery after COVID-19: Planning for debt restructuring should start now.” VoxEU, March 21st. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/corporate-debt-burdens-threaten-economic-recovery-aftercoronavirus.

16. Bernheim, B.D. and J.K. Scholz, 1993. “Private saving and public policy.” Tax policy and the economy 7: 73-110.

17. Beverly, S., 1997. “How can the poor save? Theory and evidence on saving in low-income households.” CSD Working Paper No. 97-3. Washington University, Center for Social Development.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Blanchard, O. and J. Pisani-Ferry, 2020. “Monetisation: Do not panic.” VoxEU, April 10th. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/monetisation-do-not-panic.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Bovenberg, A. L. and L.H. Goulder, 1996. “Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses.” American Economic Review 86(4): 985-1000.

20. Brainard, S. L. and T. Verdier, 1994. “Lobbying and adjustment in declining industries.” European Economic Review 38(3-4): 586-595.

21. Brown, J.R. and A.L. Guiffrida, 2014. “Carbon emissions comparison of last mile delivery versus customer pickup.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 17(6): 503-521.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Browning, M. and A. Lusardi, 1996. “Household saving: Micro theories and micro facts.” Journal of Economic Literature 34(4):1797-1855.

23. Brynjolfsson, E., J. Horton, A. Ozimek, D. Rock, G. Sharma and H.Y.T. Ye, 2020. “COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data.” MIT initiative on the digital economy working paper series. Available at https://john-joseph-horton.com/papers/remote_work.pdf.

24. Buehler, R., 2011. “Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA.” Journal of Transport Geography 19(4): 644-657.

25. Carrington, D., 2020. “’‘Coronavirus profiteers’ condemned as polluters gain bailout billions.” The Guardian, April 17th. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/17/coronavirus-profiteers-condemned-aspolluters -gain-bailout-billions. 22 Carse, A., A. Goodman, R. Mackett, J. Panter and D. Ogilvie, 2013. “The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge.” Journal of Transport Geography 28: 67-74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Carvalho, V.M., S. Hansen, . Ortiz, J.R. Garcia, T. Rodrigo, S. Rodriguez Mora and P. Ruiz de Aguirre, 2020. “Tracking the Covid-19 crisis with high-resolution transaction data.” April 16th. Available at https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/tracking-the-covid-19-crisis-withhigh -resolution-transaction-data/.

27. CAT, 2020. A government roadmap for addressing the climate and post COVID-19 economic crises. Report Climate Action Tracker. April 9th. Available at https://climateactiontracker.org/publications/addressing-the-climate-and-post-covid-19-economiccrises /. Coady, D., I. Parry, N-P. Le and B. Shang, 2019. “Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates.” IMF Working Paper WP/19/89. Available at https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/WP/2019/WPIEA2019089.ashx.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Demetriades, P.O. and T.P. Mamuneas, 2000. “Intertemporal output and employment effects of public infrastructure capital: evidence from 12 OECD economies”. The Economic Journal, 110(465), pp.687-712.

29. Dezember, R., 2020. “U.S. Oil Costs Less Than Zero After a Sharp Monday Selloff.” Wall Street Journal, April 21st. Available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-oil-is-11-a-barrel-now-but-threetimes -that-in-autumn-11587392745.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Diamond, P.A. and J.A. Hausman, 1984. “Individual retirement and savings behavior.” Journal of Public Economics 23(1-2): 81-114.

31. Dinu, M., R. Abbate, G.F. Gensini, A. Casini and F. Sofi, 2017. “Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57(17): 3640-3649.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Dupas, P. and J. Robinson, 2013. “Why don’t the poor save more? Evidence from health savings experiments.” American Economic Review 103(4):1138-71. 23 Dynan, K.E., J. Skinner and S.P. Zeldes, 2004. “Do the rich save more?” Journal of Political Economy 112(2): 397-444.

33. Eskeland, G.A. and A.E. Harrison, 2002. “Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the PHH.” NBER Working Paper No. 8888.

34. Fattouh, B. and L. El-Katiri, 2013. “Energy subsidies in the Middle East and North Africa.” Energy Strategy Reviews 2(1): 108-115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Felstead, A. and G. Henseke, 2017. “Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance.” New Technology, Work and Employment 32(3): 195-212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Ferrari, R., G. Di Pasquale and C. Rapezzi, 2020. “Commentary: What is the relationship between coronavirus and cardiovascular disease?” International Journal of Cardiology 310:167-168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Financial Times, 2020. “The virus fight opens up a climate opportunity.” May 15th. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/eb683e52-95d0-11ea-abcd-371e24b679ed.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. France24, 2020. “Canada ties coronavirus help to climate goals.” May 11th. Available at https://www.france24.com/en/20200511-canada-ties-coronavirus-help-to-climate-goals.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Freire-González, J., 2018. “Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review.” Journal of Policy Modeling 40(1): 194-223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Gali, J., 2020. “Helicopter money: The time is now.” VoxEU, March 17th. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/helicopter-money-time-now.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Gandelman, N., 2017. “Do the rich save more in Latin America?” The Journal of Economic Inequality 15(1): 75-92.

42. Gentry, W.M. and R.G. Hubbard, 2004. “Entrepreneurship and household saving.” Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 4(1): article 8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Gerber, P.J., H. Steinfeld, B. Henderson, A. Mottet, C. Opio, J. Dijkman, A. Falcucci, and G. Tempio, 2013. “Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Gillingham K. and A. Munk-Nielsen, 2019. “A tale of two tails: Commuting and the fuel price response in driving.” Journal of Urban Economics 109: 27-40. 24 Gottdenker, N., D. Streicker, C.L. Faust and R. Carroll, 2014. “Anthropogenic Land Use Change and Infectious Diseases: A Review of the Evidence.” EcoHealth 11(4): 619-632.

45. Goulder, L.H., 1995. “Environmental Taxation and the ‘Double Dividend’: A Reader's Guide.” International Tax and Public Finance 2(2): 157-183.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Goulder, L.H., M.A.C. Hafstead and R.C. Williams, III, 2016. “General Equilibrium Impacts of a Federal Clean Energy Standard.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 8(2):186-218.

47. Governments have already been announcing very large investments in infrastructure as part of their stimulus programs (New Europe, 2020). Following the coronavirus stimulus, public debt stocks will be substantially higher, making it unlikely there will be appetite for a further round of ‘green’ public investment in the near future. From a coronavirus perspective, the immediate benefit of such investment stimulus is unclear. The stimulus would primarily operate through the construction sector, but this sector has not seen severe layoffs due to the health crisis. To the extent that there is potential for sufficiently skilled workers to move in from other sectors, there can also be beneficial short-run effects on overall layoffs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Grøntved A., R.W. Koivula, I. Johansson, P. Wennberg, L. Østergaard, G. Hallmans, F. Renström and P.W. Franks, 2016. “Bicycling to Work and Primordial Prevention of Cardiovascular Risk: A Cohort Study Among Swedish Men and Women.” Journal of the American Heart Association 5(11):e004413.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Grey, F., 2018. “Corporate lobbying for environmental protection.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 90: 23-40.

50. Hardi, L. and U. Wagner, 2019. “Grocery Delivery or Customer Pickup—Influences on Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Munich.” Sustainability 11(3): 641.

51. Hart, R., 2013. “Directed technological change and factor shares.” Economics Letters 119(1): 77-80.

52. Harvey, F., 2020. “US fossil fuel giants set for a coronavirus bailout bonanza.” The Guardian, May 12th. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/may/12/us-fossil-fuelcompanies -coronavirus-bailout-oil-coal-fracking-giants-bond-scheme.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Hassler, J., P. Krusell and C. Olovsson, 2012. “Energy-saving technical change.” NBER Working Paper No. 18456.

54. Hepburn, C., B. O’Callaghan, N. Stern, J. Stiglitz and D. Zenghelis, 2020. “Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?” Smith School Working Paper 20-02.

55. Ipsos, 2020. “Two thirds of citizens around the world agree climate change is as serious a crisis as coronavirus.” April 22nd. Available at https://www.ipsos.com/en/two-thirds-citizens-aroundworld -agree-climate-change-serious-crisis-coronavirus.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Jacobsson, S. and V. Lauber, 2006. “The politics and policy of energy system transformation— explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology.” Energy Policy 34(3): 256-276. 25 Kaplan, G. and G.L. Violante, 2014. “A Tale of Two Stimulus Payments: 2001 versus 2008”. American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 104(5): 116-121.

57. Kapoor, S. and W. Buiter, 2020. “To fight the COVID pandemic, policymakers must move fast and break taboos.” VoxEU, April 6th. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/fight-covid-pandemicpolicymakers -must-move-fast-and-break-taboos.

58. Larcom, S., F. Rauch and T. Willems, 2017. “The benefits of forced experimentation: Striking evidence from the London underground network.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4): 20192055.

59. Laville, S., 2020. “Coronavirus: airlines seek €12.8bn in bailouts without environmental conditions attached.” The Guardian, 22nd April. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/22/airlines-seek-128bn-in-coronavirus-bailoutswithout -environmental-conditions-attached.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Le Quéré, C., R.B. Jackson, M.W. Jones, A.J. Smith, S. Abernethy, R.M. Andrew, A.J. De-Gol, D.R. Willis, Y. Shan, J.G. Canadell and P. Friedlingstein, 2020. “Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement.” Nature Climate Change, published online May 19th. Available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0797.

61. Lema, M.A., A. Laya, T. Mahmoodi, M. Cuevas, J. Sachs, J. Markendahl and M. Dohler, 2017. “Business case and technology analysis for 5G low latency applications.” IEEE Access 5: 5917-5935.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. List, J.A., W. McHone, W. Warren and D.L. Millimet, 2004. “Effects of Environmental Regulation on Foreign and Domestic Plant Births: Is There a Home Field Advantage?” Journal of Urban Economics 56(2): 303-326.

63. Mallet, V., 2020. “France rules out coronavirus aid for tax-haven businesses.” Financial Times, 23rd April. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/c6bf2a72-e2c0-43cc-94af-35e998bf81fa.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Martin, R., L.B. De Preux and U.J. Wagner, 2014. “The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing: Evidence from microdata.” Journal of Public Economics 117: 1-14.

65. Masciandaro, D., 2020: “Covid-19 helicopter money: Economics and politics.” Covid Economics 7, April 20th. Available at https://cepr.org/content/covid-economics-vetted-and-real-time-papers-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. Matsumura, W. and Z. Adam, 2019. “Fossil fuel consumption subsidies bounced back strongly in 2018.” IEA Commentary, June 13th. Available at https://www.iea.org/commentaries/fossil-fuelconsumption -subsidies-bounced-back-strongly-in-2018. 26 Mehta, V., S. Goel, R. Kabarriti, D. Cole, M. Goldfinger, A. Acuna-Villaorduna, K. Pradhan, R.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Mining and fossil fuels The oil sector has been hit hard, as demand for transportation has plummeted and oil prices briefly became negative during April 2020 (Dezember, 2020). As a result, the United States is planning for a bond bailout program that includes oil producers and coal-heavy companies (Harvey, 2020).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Morrison, C.J. and A.E. Schwartz, 1992. “State infrastructure and productive performance”. WP No. w3981, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Neves, A. and C. Brand, 2019. “Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 123: 130-146.

70. New Europe, 2020. “EU recovery plan focuses on Green Deal initiatives.” May 27th. Available at https://www.neweurope.eu/article/eu-recovery-plan-focuses-on-green-deal-initiatives/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
71. Nuccitelli, D., 2018. “Canada passed a carbon tax that will give most Canadians more money.” The Guardian, October 26th. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climateconsensus -97-per-cent/2018/oct/26/canada-passed-a-carbon-tax-that-will-give-most-canadiansmore -money.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
72. OECD, 2012. “The Jobs Potential of a Shift Towards a Low-Carbon Economy.” OECD Green Growth Papers, No. 2012/01, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9h3630320v-en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Of course, a weakened economic environment may push some firms into bankruptcy. R&D work is often associated with team-specific human capital. Bankruptcies, by breaking up successful R&D teams, tend to reduce patenting activity (Baghai et al., 2018). Thus it may be particularly useful to ensure the continued viability of firms working on innovation in the renewables sector by way of extending grants or loans to them while the crisis lasts. The channels involved are political and technological. We categorize the corona effect as neutralto -good and the climate effect as good.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
74. Ogen, Y., 2020. “Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to the coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality rate.” Science of The Total Environment, 725: 138165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. One suggested solution involves ‘helicopter money’: the financing of stimulus transfers by the central bank printing money, i.e. monetizing the associated debt (Blanchard and Pisani-Ferry, 2020; Gali, 2020; Kapoor and Buiter, 2020; Yashiv, 2020). Unlike the canonical indiscriminate helicopter drop intended to move an economy off the zero lower bound, for instance by a lump-sum transfer to citizens or to taxpayers, the current crisis calls for targeted transfers. Given the unique nature of the coronavirus crisis, such a policy can be credibly argued to be an exceptional, one-off event, which does not need to impact the credibility of the central bank’s inflation target.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
76. Parry, I.W.H., D. Heine, S. Li and E. Lis, 2014. Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
77. Partridge, J., 2020. “World’s biggest fund manager vows to divest from thermal coal.” The Guardian, January 14th. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/jan/14/blackrock-saysclimate -crisis-will-now-guide-its-investments.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

78. Perino, G., R.A. Ritz and A.A. van Benthem, 2019. “Understanding Overlapping Policies: Internal Carbon Leakage and the Punctured Waterbed.” NBER Working Paper No. 25643. 27 Pichler, P.P., I.S. Jaccard, U. Weisz and H. Weisz, 2019. “International comparison of health care carbon footprints.” Environmental Research Letters 14(6): 064004.

79. Pike, J., T. Bogich, S. Elwood, D.C. Finnoff and P. Daszak, 2014. “Economic optimization of a global strategy to address the pandemic threat.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(52): 18519-18523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

80. Pucher J., R. Buehler, D.R. Bassett and A.L. Dannenberg, 2010. “Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data.” American Journal of Public Health 100(10): 1986‐1992.

81. Quadrini, V., 2000. “Entrepreneurship, saving, and social mobility.” Review of Economic Dynamics 3(1): 1-40.

82. Ramey, V.A., 2011. “Can government purchases stimulate the economy?” Journal of Economic Literature 49(3): 673-685.

83. Ramey, V.A., 2019. “Ten years after the financial crisis: What have we learned from the renaissance in fiscal research?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(2): 89-114.

84. Rasmussen M.G., A. Grøntved, K. Blond, K. Overvad, A. Tjønneland, M.K. Jensen, and L. Østergaard, 2016. “Associations between Recreational and Commuter Cycling, Changes in Cycling, and Type 2 Diabetes Risk: A Cohort Study of Danish Men and Women.” PLoS Med 13(7): e1002076.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
85. Recent empirical evidence suggests that this may often be the case (Bamberg, 2006; Larcom et al. 2017; Yang and Yong, 2017). One reason for this has been that individuals seem to underexperiment in normal times and that network-efficiency may thus improve as a result of a forced experimentation (Larcom et al. 2017). One might also argue that positive feedback mechanisms (bandwagon or network effects) may give rise to a path dependence as result of increased adoption and familiarity with new communication technology, which would also increase the likelihood of a permanent effect on the proportion of the population working from home.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

86. Säll, S. and I.-M. Gren, 2015. “Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden.” Food Policy 55: 41-53.

87. Scarpetta, S., M. Queisser, A. Garnero and S. Königs, 2020. “Supporting people and companies to deal with COVID-19: Options for an immediate employment and social policy response.” VoxEU, 12th April. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/options-immediate-employment-and-socialpolicy -response-coronavirus.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
88. See also Morrison and Schwartz (1992). 38 in this field will be suitable for teleworking, but others will require physical presence at laboratories and collaboration with colleagues. One option is to subsidize large pilot projects. The stimulatory benefits of such projects are similar to other projects in renewables infrastructure investment.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
89. Seto, K.C., S.J. Davis, R.B. Mitchell, E.C. Stokes, G. Unruh and D. Ürge-Vorsatz, 2016. “Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41: 425-452.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

90. Shalizi, Z. and F. Lecocq, 2009. “Climate change and the economics of targeted mitigation in sectors with long-lived capital stock.” Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 5063. Washington, DC: World Bank. 28 Sinn, H-W., 2020. “How best to fight the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic.” The Guardian, March 17th. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/mar/17/howbest -to-fight-the-economic-impact-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic.

91. Sobczyk, N., 2018. “Lawmakers roll out landmark bipartisan carbon bill.” E&E News, November 28th. Available at https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060107547.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
92. Spiro, D., T. Andersson, E. Grönqvist, E. Lindqvist, H. Malmberg and R. Östling, 2020. “Six Policy Ideas for Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Working Paper, Lund University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

93. Springmann, M., D. Mason-DCroz, S. Robinson, K. Wiebe, H.C.J. Godfray, M. Rayner and P. Scarborough, 2017. “Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities.” Nature Climate Change 7(1): 69.

94. Strand, J., and M. Toman, 2010. “Green Stimulus, Economic Recovery, and Long-Term Sustainable Development.” Policy Research Working Paper; No. 5163. World Bank, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

95. Strunz, S., E. Gawel and P. Lehmann, 2016. “The political economy of renewable energy policies in Germany and the EU.” Utilities Policy 42: 33-41.

96. The channels involved are through investment and learning, but a shift towards active modes of transportation could also have long-run health effects. For one, there are some indications that 46 coronavirus is more severe in regions with poor air quality. Comparative studies show that cities, regions and countries with a higher proportion of people commuting using active modes of transportation see lower rates of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension (Pucher et al., 2010; Rasmussen et al., 2016; Grøntved et al., 2016). This reduces the share of people vulnerable to the coronavirus. We categorize the corona effect as good and the climate effect as good.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
97. The direct effect on corona is that it reduces buying power. But fuel subsidies are regressive (Fattouh and El-Katiri, 2013), so a reduction in them coupled with reduced labor taxes will increase consumption and thus stimulate demand. Fossil fuel subsidies can be seen as a negative carbon tax. Hence the same conclusions as above apply: we categorize abolished fossil-fuel subsidies as good for corona and very good for climate.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
98. The effect on corona is an immediate reduction in virus spread, health care costs and reduced sick leave. In the long-term, employers’ gains come from a more productive workforce which uses less space and is more cost effective to house, and workers gain from the prospect of a better work-life balance, thereby increasing levels of job satisfaction and organizational commitment (Felstead and Henseke, 2017). However, when it comes to labor, apart from jobs created from IT infrastructure investments, it is unclear whether any net positive effect on jobs may result from any other ‘work from home’ targeting policies. It may however have substantial relocation effects in terms of migration from city to countryside. Based on the above discussion we categorize the climate effect as good and the corona effects as neutral in the long-run.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
99. Thota, S. Reissman, J.A. Sparano, B.A. Gartrell, R.V. Smith, N. Ohri, M. Garg, A.D. Racine, S. Kalnicki, R. Perez-Soler, B. Halmos, and A. Verma, 2020. “Case Fatality Rate of Cancer Patients with coronavirus in a New York Hospital System.” Cancer Discoveries, published online May 5th.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
100. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. What if more people bought groceries online instead of driving to a store? Available at https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/what-if-more-people-boughtgroceries -online-instead-driving-store.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

101. Van der Meijden, G. and S. Smulders, 2017. ”Carbon Lock‐In: The Role of Expectations.” International Economic Review 58(4): 1371-1415.

102. Whether fiscal stimulus to R&D spending is an effective tool for mitigating the consequences of the coronavirus crisis depends on how severely energy-sector R&D work has been affected. Some tasks 10 For instance, Demetriades and Mamuneas (2000) show that regular infrastructure projects give low returns in the short run but high returns in the long run. Hence, for boosting employment under the corona crisis it is not very useful.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
103. Whether working from home becomes the new normal or not will depend on the experiences had by both workers and employers. Government policies could however help incentivize continued work from home post corona. Examples of such policies are: 16 Parry et al. (2014) estimate the co-benefits associated with a reduction of local air pollutants would already be substantial just for a reduction of coal burning—the co-benefits alone would justify a U.S. carbon price of $35/tCO2, of which 30% is due to NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Higher coronavirus mortality rates would increase such co-benefits. 45 - Subsidizing work from home equipment (e.g., adjustable desks, chairs, computers). - Removing possibilities for companies to deduct business travel costs. - Legislation on ‘right to work from home’. - Investing in IT infrastructure / improving connectivity when working remotely.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
104. Winters, M., R. Buehler and T. Götschi, 2017. “Policies to promote active travel: evidence from reviews from the literature.” Current Environmental Health Reports 4(3): 278-285.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
105. Wu, X., R.C. Nethery, B.M. Sabath, D. Braun, and F. Dominici, 2020. “Exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: A nationwide cross-sectional study.” Available at https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/covid-pm/files/pm_and_covid_mortality_med.pdf.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
106. Xiong, X., L. Zhang, Y. Hao, P. Zhang, Y. Chang and G. Liu, 2020. “Urban dietary changes and linked carbon footprint in China: A case study of Beijing.” Journal of Environmental Management 255: 109877.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

107. Yang, N. and L.L. Yong, 2017. “Temporary incentives change daily routines: Evidence from a field experiment on Singapore’s subways.” Management Science 64(7): 3365-3379. 29 Yashiv, E., 2020. “Breaking the taboo: The political economy of COVID-motivated helicopter drops.” VoxEU, March 26th. Available at https://voxeu.org/article/political-economy-covidmotivated -helicopter-drops.

1. Datenmangel und andere Probleme der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Politikberatung in Deutschland. (2022). Haucap, Justus.
   In: Wirtschaftsdienst.
   RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:102:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10273-022-3242-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The Russian State’s Size and its Footprint: Have They Increased?. (2019). Slavov, Slavi ; Di Bella, C. ; Dynnikova, Oksana.
   In: IMF Working Papers.
   RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2019/053.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Sekt oder Selters? Ökonomische Folgen der Reformzurückhaltung bei der Beendigung des Solidaritätszuschlags. (2018). Thomas, Tobias ; Strohner, Ludwig ; Berger, Johannes.
   In: DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven.
   RePEc:zbw:diceop:98.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research. (2018). Leuz, Christian.
   In: Accounting and Business Research.
   RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:48:y:2018:i:5:p:582-608.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. On economists as policy advisors with applications to Switzerland. (2018). Brunetti, Aymo.
   In: Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics.
   RePEc:spr:sjecst:v:154:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s41937-017-0009-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data. (2018). Herbst, Daniel ; Naidu, Suresh ; Kuziemko, Ilyana ; Farber, Henry S.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:pri:indrel:620.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Impact of Politics in Policy Reforms. (2018). , Tharanga.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:88747.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. AN ATTEMPT TO CRYSTALIZE THE BLACK-BOX MYSTERY: Institutional Quality or Constitutional Rights. (2018). Siddiqi, Wasif M ; Sarwar, Saima.
   In: Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics.
   RePEc:pje:journl:article28sumvii.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data. (2018). Herbst, Daniel ; Naidu, Suresh ; Kuziemko, Ilyana ; Farber, Henry S.
   In: NBER Working Papers.
   RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24587.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Evidence-Based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research. (2018). Leuz, Christian.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Three globalizations, not two: Rethinking the history and economics of trade and globalization. (2018). Palley, Thomas.
    In: FMM Working Paper.
    RePEc:imk:fmmpap:18-2018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Inequality and unionization within the United States. (2018). Meszaros, John.
    In: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:67:y:2018:i:c:p:326-333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues. (2018). Prvost, Benot ; Rivaud, Audrey.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pb:p:370-380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. A theory of economic policy lock-in and lock-out via hysteresis: Rethinking economists approach to economic policy. (2017). Palley, Thomas.
    In: Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020).
    RePEc:zbw:ifweej:201718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The rule of law and the emergence of market exchange: A new institutional economic perspective. (2017). Haucap, Justus.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:276.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The economics of utopia: a co-evolutionary model of ideas, citizenship and socio-political change. (2017). Izquierdo, Luis ; Fatas-Villafranca, Francisco ; Almudi, Isabel ; Potts, Jason.
    In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
    RePEc:spr:joevec:v:27:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00191-017-0507-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Transforming Research Results into Policy Advice: Political Economy Perspective. (2017). Afontsev, S.
    In: Journal of the New Economic Association.
    RePEc:nea:journl:y:2017:i:35:p:192-198.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The fallacy of the globalization trilemma: reframing the political economy of globalization and implications for democracy. (2017). Palley, Thomas.
    In: FMM Working Paper.
    RePEc:imk:fmmpap:08-2017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Zum Profil der deutschsprachigen Volkswirtschaftslehre: Paradigmatische Ausrichtung und politische Orientierung deutschsprachiger Oekonom_innen (On the current state of German-speaking Economics: Para. (2017). Pühringer, Stephan ; Kapeller, Jakob ; Grimm, Christian ; Phringer, Stephan.
    In: ICAE Working Papers.
    RePEc:ico:wpaper:70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Determining an optimal strategy for energy investment in Kazakhstan. (2017). MacGregor, James.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:107:y:2017:i:c:p:210-224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. A theory of economic policy lock-in and lock-out via hysteresis: Rethinking economists approach to economic policy. (2016). Palley, Thomas.
    In: Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201650.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Gainers and Losers of Political Instability: Evidence from the Anti-Japanese Demonstration in China. (2016). Luo, Zijun ; Zhou, Yonghong.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:shs:wpaper:1608.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Does financial development reduce income inequality and poverty? Evidence from emerging countries. (2016). Seven, Ünal ; coskun, yener.
    In: Emerging Markets Review.
    RePEc:eee:ememar:v:26:y:2016:i:c:p:34-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Institutions for Infrastructure in Developing Countries: What We Know and the Lot We still Need to Know. (2016). Estache, Antonio.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/230527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The Political Economy of Taxation: Power, Structure, Redistribution. (2016). Winer, Stanley.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. The Political Economy of Taxation: Power, Structure, Redistribution. (2016). Winer, Stanley.
    In: Carleton Economic Papers.
    RePEc:car:carecp:16-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. COMPETIÇÃO POLÍTICA, GRUPOS DE INTERESSE E A OFERTA DE SERVIÇOS PÚBLICOS: UMA ANÁLISE PARA OS MUNICÍPIOS CEARENSES NOS ANOS DE 2005 E 2009. (2016). de Melo, Paulo ; Sousa, Francisco Antonio .
    In: Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2014:064.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. State and Development: The Need for a Reappraisal of the Current Literature. (2016). Bardhan, Pranab.
    In: Journal of Economic Literature.
    RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:54:y:2016:i:3:p:862-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. The Distribution of Top Incomes in Former British West Africa. (2015). Atkinson, Anthony.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wel:wpaper:201503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Capital flows, long term bond yields and fiscal stance: the Eurozone policy trilemma. (2015). Canale, Rosaria Rita.
    In: Portuguese Economic Journal.
    RePEc:spr:portec:v:14:y:2015:i:1:p:31-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. To Regulate or to Deregulate? The Role of Downstream Competition in Upstream Monopoly Vertically Linked Markets. (2015). POLEMIS, MICHAEL ; Eleftheriou, Konstantinos.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68726.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Beliefs, politics, and environmental policy. (2015). Ollivier, Hélène ; Millner, Antony.
    In: GRI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Policy Goals for Improved Water Quality in the Baltic Sea: When do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs?. (2015). Huhtala, Anni ; Artell, Janne ; Ahlvik, Lassi ; Dahlbo, Kim ; Hyytiainen, Kari ; Ahtiainen, Heini.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:61:y:2015:i:2:p:217-241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Institutions and Development in MENA Region: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector. (2015). Fakih, Ali ; Arayssi, Mahmoud.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8772.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. State and Economic Development: The Need for a Reappraisal of the Current Literature. (2015). Bardhan, Pranab.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:7060.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Labour market institutions: the building blocks of just societies. (2015). Berg, Janine.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:16143_1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Electricity regulation and FDIs spillovers in the OECD: A panel data econometric approach. (2015). POLEMIS, MICHAEL ; Fafaliou, Irene.
    In: The Journal of Economic Asymmetries.
    RePEc:eee:joecas:v:12:y:2015:i:2:p:110-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Zu wenig Einfluss des ökonomischen Sachverstands? Empirische Befunde zum Einfluss von Ökonomen und anderen Wissenschaftlern auf die Wirtschaftspolitik. (2015). Wagner, Gert ; Thomas, Tobias ; Haucap, Justus.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1449.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Institutions and Development in MENA Region: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector. (2015). Ali Fakih, Mahmoud Arayssi, .
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2015s-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Economic and Political Transitions from Premodern to Modern States in the Meiji Restoration and Xinhai Revolution: A Strategic Approach. (2014). Aoki, Masahiko.
    In: ADBI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:adbiwp:0486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Wealth transfer taxation: an empirical investigation. (2014). Winer, Stanley ; Scabrosetti, Simona ; Profeta, Paola.
    In: International Tax and Public Finance.
    RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:21:y:2014:i:4:p:720-767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Capitale fiduciario e sviluppo a livello regionale: un?analisi esplorativa del ruolo del capitale civico e morale. (2014). Esposito, Gaetano Fausto ; Altobelli, Carla.
    In: RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO.
    RePEc:fan:restre:v:html10.3280/rest2014-003001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Under the Thumb of History? Political institutions and the Scope for Action. (2014). Duflo, Esther ; Banerjee, Abhijit.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:5640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Look before you leap: Why politicians may have a point to be hesitant about the gains from trade. (2014). Gundlach, Erich ; de Vaal, Albert.
    In: Economic Systems.
    RePEc:eee:ecosys:v:38:y:2014:i:1:p:89-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Minimum Wages as a Redistributive Device in the Long Run. (2014). Moutos, Thomas ; Economides, George.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. The Political Economy of Trade-Financial Liberalization and Financial Underdevelopment: A perspective from China. (2013). Morgan, Horatio M..
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:50031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Financial Development and Economic Growth: New Lessons from Small Open Economies. (2013). Morgan, Horatio M..
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:49842.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning , edited by Nancy Brooks , Kieran Donaghy , and Gerrit-Jan Knaap . 2012 . New York : Oxford University Press . 1006 + xx. ISBN 978-0-19-538062-0, $175.. (2013). Bolton, Roger.
    In: Journal of Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:53:y:2013:i:3:p:535-539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Spatially explicit bio-economic modelling for the Baltic Sea: Do the benefits of nutrient abatement outweigh the costs?. (2013). Huhtala, Anni ; Artell, Janne ; Ahlvik, Lassi ; Dahlbo, Kim ; Hyytiainen, Kari ; Ahtiainen, Heini.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:mttfdp:160728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Lunch with Pigou: Externalities and the “Hidden” Cost of Food. (2013). Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:161383.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-02 20:57:49 || Missing content? Let us know