This document has not been cited yet.

1. . “International Technology Diffusion.” Journal of Economic Literature XLII, September: (2004) 752–782.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. . “Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States.” Journal of International Economics 68, 2: (2006) 325–344.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. . “The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade.” The review of economics and statistics 71, 1: (1989) 143–153.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Aitken, B.J., and A.E. Harrison. “Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela.” American Economic Review 89, 3: (1999) 605–618.

5. Alvarez, Fernando, F Buera, and RE Lucas. “Idea Flows, Economic Growth, and Trade.”, 2012.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck, and Carl-Johan Dalgaard. “Flows of people, flows of ideas, and the inequality of nations.” Journal of Economic Growth 16, 1: (2011) 1–32.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Anderson, JE. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” American Economic Review 69, 1: (1979) 106–116.

8. Arrow, Kenneth J. “Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technologcal Knowledge.” The American Economic Review 59, 2: (1969) 29–35.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Balassa, B. “Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage.” The Manchester School 33, 2: (1965) 99–123.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Bergstrand, JH. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: some Microeconomic Foundation and Empirical Evidence.” The review of economics and statistics 67, 3: (1985) 474–481.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. BHH Export Similarity Index −2 0 2 4 6 Simliarity Index (e=0.25) The figure contains three scatterplots comparing our original (BHH) Export Similarity Index and the recalculations of the Similarity Index using different values of ε (0.001, 0.01 and 0.25 from left to right), for all country pairs, in year 2000. Figure A2: Stylized Facts Similarity Index (ε = 0.001) 0 1 2 3
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. BHH Export Similarity Index −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 Prox. Weighted SI The figure is a scatterplot comparing our original (BHH) Export Similarity Index and the Proximity Weighted Export Similarity Index for all country pairs, in year 2000. some discontinuity in the declining relation with distance, but it is declining overall. We turn to study this more in detail by replicating model (3), using on the LHS a normalized version of the Proximity Weighted Similarity Index (with mean zero and unit standard deviation). The results are presented in Table A6. Consistently with the results in the main body of the paper, longer distances are negatively correlated with similarity in exports, while countries sharing a border and in the same region tend to have a larger proximity weighted similarity index, as opposed to non-neighboring countries in different regions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Border 0.0531 0.0257 0.2404 0.1861 (0.020)*** (0.022) (0.068)*** (0.077)** Same Region 0.0869 0.0114 0.2353 0.1491 (0.010)*** (0.012) (0.030)*** (0.041)*** Same Language 0.0154 0.0382 (0.013) (0.044) Have/Had Colonial Relationship -0.0282 0.1381 (0.023) (0.120) Common Colonizer 0.0075 -0.0580 (0.016) (0.042) Abs. Dif. Ln GDP Per Capita (PPP) -0.0568 -0.3711 (0.009)*** (0.028)*** Abs. Dif. Ln Population -0.0081 0.0103 (0.003)*** (0.011) Log Total Bilateral Trade (Imp + Exp) -0.0100 -0.0174 (0.001)*** (0.002)*** Abs. Dif.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, and J-W. Lee. “How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?” Journal of International Economics 45, 1: (1998) 115–135.

15. Bottazzi, Laura, and Giovanni Peri. “Innovation and spillovers in regions : Evidence from European patent data.” European Economic Review 47: (2003) 687–710.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Brander, J, and P Krugman. “A reciprocal dumping model of international trade.” Journal of International Economics 15, 1983: (1983) 313–321.

17. Brander, JA. “Intra-Industry trade in identical commodities.” Journal of International Economics 11, 1981: (1981) 1–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Branstetter, Lee G. “Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope ? Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan.” Journal of International Economics 53: (2001) 53–79.

19. Cambridge, MA, 2011. Hausmann, Ricardo, and Bailey Klinger. “The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage.” CID Working Paper Series , 146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Coe, David T., Elhanan Helpman, and Alexander W. Hoffmaister. “International R&D spillovers and institutions.” European Economic Review 53, 7: (2009) 723–741. Davis, Donald R. “Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Deardorff, Alan. “Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world?” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, edited by Jeffrey Frankel, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. “Technology and bilateral trade.” NBER Working Paper Series , 6253.

22. Density 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 Export Similarity Index All Pairs Neighbors Pairs Distribution .1 .2 .3 .4 Export Similarity Index 250 1250 2500 3750 5000 Distance .35*exp( −.221*dcc’) Average by Distance NPRB Products Only The left panel of the figure shows the distributions (in year 2000) of the F&K Export Similarity Index for All (not neighbors) Country Pairs, and for Neighbors Pairs only. The right panel shows the average F&K Export Similarity Index for country pairs in each bracket of distance between 250 km. to 5000 km. The upper figures use the F&K Similarity Index for all products, and the lower figures use the F&K Similarity Index for NPRB products only.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Density −.2 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 Export Similarity Index All Pairs Neighbors Pairs Distribution .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 Export Similarity Index 250 1250 2500 3750 5000 Distance .408*exp( −.259*dcc’) Average by Distance NPRB Products Only The left panel of the figure shows the distributions (in year 2000) of the Export Similarity Index (using ε = 0.25) for All (not neighbors) Country Pairs, and for Neighbors Pairs only. The right panel shows the average Export Similarity Index (using ε = 0.25) for country pairs in each bracket of distance between 250 km. to 5000 km. The upper figures use the Export Similarity Index (using ε = 0.25) for all products, and the lower figures use the Export Similarity Index (using ε = 0.25) for NPRB products only.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Density −.2 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 Export Similarity Index All Pairs Neighbors Pairs Distribution .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 Export Similarity Index 250 1250 2500 3750 5000 Distance .424*exp( −.243*dcc’) Average by Distance NPRB Products Only The left panel of the figure shows the distributions (in year 2000) of the Indexed-RCA Export Similarity Index for All (not neighbors) Country Pairs, and for Neighbors Pairs only. The right panel shows the average Indexed-RCA Export Similarity Index for country pairs in each bracket of distance between 250 km. to 5000 km. The upper figures use the Indexed-RCA Similarity Index for all products, and the lower figures use the Indexed-RCA Similarity Index for NPRB products only.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Density −1 −.5 0 .5 1 Export Similarity Index All Pairs Neighbors Pairs Distribution .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 Export Similarity Index 250 1250 2500 3750 5000 Distance .435*exp( −.0871*dcc’) Average by Distance NPRB Products Only The left panel of the figure shows the distributions (in year 2000) of the Proximity Weighted Export Similarity Index for All (not neighbors) Country Pairs, and for Neighbors Pairs only. The right panel shows the average Proximity Weighted Export Similarity Index for country pairs in each bracket of distance between 250 km. to 5000 km. The upper figures use the Proximity Weighted Similarity Index for all products, and the lower figures use the Proximity Weighted Similarity Index for NPRB products only.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Feenstra, Robert C., James R. Markusen, and Andrew K. Rose. “Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d‘Economique 34, 2: (2001) 430–447.

27. Feenstra, Robert C., Robert E. Lipsey, Haiyan Deng, Alyson C. Ma, and Hengyong Mo. “World Trade Flows: 1962-2000.” NBER Working Paper No. 11040 1962–2000.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Figure A12: Decomposition of Similarity Index for Korea and Japan in 2008 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Figure A13: Category of Products Driving Similarities per Region (Year 2008) 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 S u b S a h a r a n A f r i c a L a t i n A m e r i c a a n d t h e C a r i b b e a n M i d d l e E a s t a n d N o r t h A f r i c a W o r l d E a s t e r n E u r o p e S o u t h A s i a E a s t A s i a a n d P a c i f i c W e s t e r n a n d C e n t r a l E u r o p e N o r t h A m e r i c a
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Frankel, Jeffrey Alexander. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1997.

31. Giroud, Xavier. “Proximity and Investment: Evidence from Plant-Level Data.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128, 2: (2012) 861–915.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Haskel, JE, SC Pereira, and MJ Slaughter. “Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms?” The Review of Economics and Statistics 89, 3: (2007) 482–496. Hausmann, Ricardo, César A Hidalgo, Sebastián Bustos, Michele Coscia, Sarah Chung, Juan Jímenez, Alexander Simoes, and Muhammed A. Yildirim. The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity.

33. Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul Krugman. Market Structure and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Hidalgo, César A, Bailey Klinger, AL Barabási, and Ricardo Hausmann. “The product space conditions the development of nations.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 317, 5837: (2007) 482–7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 3: (1993) 577.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Javorcik, Beata S. “Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages.” The American Economic Review 94, 3: (2004) 605–627.

37. Kehoe, Timothy J., and Kim J. Ruhl. “How Important Is the New Goods Margin in International Trade?” Journal of Political Economy 121, 2: (2013) 358–392. Keller, Wolfgang. “Geographic localization of international technology diffusion.

38. Keller, Wolfgang, and Stephen R Yeaple. “Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: firm-level evidence from the United States.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91, November: (2009) 821–831.

39. Keller, Wolfgang, and Stephen Ross Yeaple. “The Gravity of Knowledge.” American Economic Review 103, 4: (2013) 1414–1444.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Kerr, W.R. “Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 90, 3: (2008) 518–537.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Lall, Sanjaya. “The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-98.” Oxford Development Studies 28, 3: (2000) 337–369. Leamer, EE, and James Levinsohn. “International Trade Theory: The Evidence.” In Handbook of International economics, edited by Gene M.

42. Linder, Staffan Burenstam. An essay on trade and transformation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell, 1961.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Ln GDP Per Capita (PPP) -0.1612 -0.2816 (0.035)*** (0.030)*** Abs. Dif. Ln Population -0.0447 -0.0483 (0.012)*** (0.010)*** Log Total Bilateral Trade (Imp + Exp) -0.0324 -0.0246 (0.003)*** (0.002)*** Abs. Dif. Ln Pysical Capital Per Worker -0.0077 -0.0203 (0.032) (0.027) Abs. Dif.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Ln GDP Per Capita (PPP) -0.2030 -0.1994 (0.021)*** (0.021)*** Abs. Dif.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Ln GDP Per Capita (PPP) -0.2977 -0.3413 (0.028)*** (0.030)*** Abs. Dif. Ln Population -0.0842 -0.0606 (0.012)*** (0.011)*** Log Total Bilateral Trade (Imp + Exp) -0.0294 -0.0247 (0.002)*** (0.002)*** Abs. Dif. Ln Pysical Capital Per Worker -0.0560 0.0185 (0.025)** (0.026) Abs. Dif.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Ln Human Capital Per Worker -0.4265 -0.1915 (0.054)*** (0.049)*** Abs. Dif. Ln Land Per Worker -0.0450 -0.0282 (0.033) (0.029) N 7503 7503 5460 7503 7503 5460 r2 0.27 0.29 0.40 0.44 0.45 0.56 This table uses a normalized version of the F&K Similarity Index (with mean zero and unit standard deviation) as the dependent variable. Columns 1-3 estimates model (3) using the F&K Export Similarity Index with all products, while columns 4-6 uses the F&K Export Similarity Index computed with NPRB products only. All regressions include country dummies.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Log10 RCA Japan Log10 RCA Korea The figure shows a scatterplot in where the vertical axis measures the RCA in a product for Korea, and the horizontal axis measures the RCA in a product for Japan. Each dot is a product, and it is red if it is an NPRB product, or red otherwise. The data is from year 2008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

48. Loungani, Prakash, Ashoka Mody, and Assaf Razin. “The global disconnect: the rle of transactional distance and scale economies in gravity equations.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49, 5: (2002) 526–543. Mayer, Thierry, and Soledad Zignago. “Notes on CEPII distances measures : The GeoDist database.” CEPII Working Paper , 25.

49. Polanyi, M. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London, UK: Routledge, 1962.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. PRB Driven NPRB Driven This figure shows a bar graph, which represents the share of country pairs, within region, for which their Export Similarity Index is driven by NPRB products (red) or by PRB products (blue).The data is from year 2008. Our results are also robust to our definition of jumps: Table A10 presents results limiting the sample to those observations with a baseline RCA equal to zero (as opposed to observations with RCA below 0.1). Tables A11 and A12 redefine the left-hand side of model (4): here, jumps are defined as an increase in the RCA from RCAc,p,t ≤ 0.1 (at the beginning of the period) to RCAc,p,T ≥ 2 and to RCAc,p,T ≥ 5 (by the end of the period), respectively. As expected, given that this definition of jumps is stricter, the coefficients for the role of neighbors in the likelihood of adding a new product to the export basket becomes smaller, while still statistically significant.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Rivera-Batiz, L.A., and P.M. Romer. “Economic integration and endogenous growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 2: (1990) 531–555.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Shirotori, M, B Tumurchudur, and O Cadot. “Revealed Factor Intensity Indices at the Product Level.” Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities 2010, 44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Standard errors are clustered at the country-pair level. ∗ p < 0.10, ∗∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.01 Table A2: Correlates of the Similarity Index, using ε = 0.01 All All All NPRB NPRB NPRB Ln Simple Distance (Km) -0.4473 -0.2346 -0.2276 -0.2856 -0.1046 -0.1154 (0.014)*** (0.019)*** (0.018)*** (0.013)*** (0.017)*** (0.018)*** Share a
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Stein, Ernesto, and Christian Daude. “Longitude matters: Time zones and the location of foreign direct investment.” Journal of International Economics 71, 1: (2007) 96–112.

55. Table A5: Correlates of the F&K Similarity Index All All All NPRB NPRB NPRB Ln Simple Distance (Km) -0.3690 -0.1920 -0.1834 -0.2712 -0.1168 -0.1236 (0.018)*** (0.024)*** (0.026)*** (0.018)*** (0.022)*** (0.024)*** Share a
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Table A9 replicates the results excluding the period 1980-1990 from the sample, in order to assure our results are robust to the changes in the SITC classification in year 1985.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Tinbergen, J. “Shaping the world economy.” The International Executive 5, 1: (1963) 27–30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. United Nations. “COMTRADE database.”, 2010. http://comtrade.un.org/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Venables, Anthony J. “Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition: The case of identical products and free entry.” Journal of International Economics 19, 1-2: (1985) 1–19.

60. We use these two measures to show that the variation in the Export Similarity Index (Sc,c’ ) is mostly driven by the ROW Export Similarity Index. To support this statement we run a linear regression using the Export Similarity Index as the dependent variable and both decompositions as the Figure A11: The Network of Exports Similarity (Year 2008) This figure is a network representation of the Export Similarity matrix in year 2008. In the network each node represents a country. Each country has two outgoing links, which represent the two other countries most similar in terms of their export basket, as measured by our Export Similarity Index Sc,c0 . The color of the nodes represent the geographical region, as defined by the World Bank. The color of the links represent whether NPRB products are driving the similarity (red) or, otherwise, it is being driven by PRB products (blue).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. World Bank. “World Development Indicators Online.”, 2010. http://data.worldbank.org/.

62. Zahler, Andres. “Decomposing world export growth and the relevance of new destinations.” CID Working Paper Series 2007, 20.

1. How Does the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Labor Productivity Affects Productive Capacity?. (2022). Saha, Sanjoy Kumar.
   In: International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management.
   RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:101-135.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. FDI spillovers at different levels of industrial and spatial aggregation: Evidence from the electricity sector. (2013). Del Bo, Chiara.
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:61:y:2013:i:c:p:1490-1502.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Determinants of Growth and Inflation in Southern Mediterranean Countries. (2012). Coutinho, Leonor.
   In: CEPS Papers.
   RePEc:eps:cepswp:6736.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The dynamic of financial development, imports, foreign direct investment and economic growth: cointegration and causality analysis in Pakistan. (2011). Shahbaz, Muhammad ; Mohammad, Mafizur Rahman .
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:32181.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Greasing the Wheels of International Commerce: How Services Facilitate Firms’ International Sourcing. (2010). Raff, Horst ; Görg, Holger ; Debaere, Peter ; Gorg, Holger.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:not:notgep:10/01.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Industrial clusters, entrepreneurial culture and the social environment: The effects on FDI distribution. (2009). Majocchi, Antonio ; Presutti, Manuela.
   In: International Business Review.
   RePEc:eee:iburev:v:18:y:2009:i:1:p:76-88.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. In Search of Environmental Spillovers. (2008). Ercolani, Marco ; Elliott, Robert ; Cole, Matthew ; Albornoz, Facundo.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:bir:birmec:08-03.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Productivity efficiency and firm size: An empirical analysis of foreign owned companies. (2007). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
   In: International Business Review.
   RePEc:eee:iburev:v:16:y:2007:i:6:p:713-731.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. La productividad y sus determinantes:el caso de la industria colombiana. (2006). Rosales-Rueda, Maria ; Echavarría, Juan ; Arbelaez, Maria ; Echavarria, Juan Jose.
   In: Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad.
   RePEc:col:000090:003064.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Multinational firms, exclusivity, and the degree of backward linkages. (2005). Saggi, Kamal ; Lin, Ping.
    In: Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies.
    RePEc:zbw:bubdp1:2943.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Is More Mobility Good? Firm Mobility and the Low Wage-Low Productivity Trap. (2005). Seguino, Stephanie.
    In: International Trade.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0505008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development:Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard?. (2005). Svejnar, Jan ; Sabirianova Peter, Klara.
    In: William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:wdi:papers:2005-734.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Financial Liberalization in Latin-America in the 1990s: A Reassessment. (2005). Aizenman, Joshua.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Is More Mobility Good? Firm Mobility and the Low Wage -- Low Productivity Trap. (2005). Seguino, Stephanie.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:lev:wrkpap:wp_423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard?. (2005). Svejnar, Jan ; Sabirianova Peter, Klara.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1457.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity. (2005). Howitt, Peter ; Griffith, Rachel ; Blundell, Richard ; Aghion, Philippe ; Prantl, Susanne.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5323.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Foreign Direct Investment, Competitive Pressure and Spillovers. An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firm Level Data. (2005). Siotis, Georges ; Sembenelli, Alessandro.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:4903.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Subsidy Competition in Integrating Economies. (2005). Corcos, Gregory ; Albornoz, Facundo.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:05-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The New Regionalism: Integration as a Commitment Device for Developing Countries. (2004). Waldkirch, Andreas.
    In: International Trade.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0412004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Determinants of Employment Growth at MNEs: Evidence from Egypt, India, South Africa and Vietnam. (2004). Meyer, Klaus ; Bhaumik, Sumon ; Estrin, Saul.
    In: William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:wdi:papers:2004-707.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Policies facilitating firm adjustment to globalization. (2004). Javorcik, Beata ; Hoekman, Bernard.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3441.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Transfer of technology to developing countries : unilateral and multilateral policy options. (2004). Saggi, Kamal ; Maskus, Keith ; Hoekman, Bernard.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Is the Invisible Hand Discerning or Indiscriminate? Investment and Stock Prices in the Aftermath of Capital Account Liberalizations. (2004). Henry, Peter ; Chari, Anusha.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. THE EFFECT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY: EVIDENCE FROM ESTONIA AND SLOVENIA. (2004). Vahter, Priit.
    In: University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:mtk:febawb:32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Does foreign ownership matter for survival and growth? Dynamics of competition and foreign direct investment. (2004). Taymaz, Erol ; Ozler, Sule .
    In: ERC Working Papers.
    RePEc:met:wpaper:0406.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Determinants of Employment Growth at MNEs: Evidence from Egypt, India, South Africa and Vietnam. (2004). Meyer, Klaus ; Bhaumik, Sumon ; Estrin, Saul.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Local Knowledge Spillovers in the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. (2004). Palangkaraya, Alfons ; Aw, Bee Yan.
    In: Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:iae:iaewps:wp2004n18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. HOST COUNTRY IMPACTS OF INWARD FDI: WHY SUCH DIFFERENT ANSWERS?. (2004). Sjöholm, Fredrik.
    In: EIJS Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:eijswp:0192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Export learning process in local supplier networks. (2004). CUBILLO, JOSE MARIA ; Cervio, Julio.
    In: DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB.
    RePEc:cte:wbrepe:wb042910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages. (2004). Javorcik, Beata.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:3:p:605-627.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Foreign direct investmant, spillovers and absorptive capacity: Evidence from quantile regressions. (2003). Görg, Holger ; Girma, Sourafel.
    In: The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Human Capital and Inward FDI. (2003). Kokko, Ari ; Blomstrom, Magnus.
    In: EIJS Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:eijswp:0167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers From FDI: a threshold regression analysis. (2003). Girma, Sourafel.
    In: European Economy Group Working Papers.
    RePEc:eeg:euroeg:25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Entrepreneurship and performance around MNC affiliates. (2003). CUBILLO, JOSE MARIA.
    In: UC3M Working papers. Economics.
    RePEc:cte:werepe:we033012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Market access spillovers: an empirical approach to the flagship firm effect. (2003). CUBILLO, JOSE MARIA ; Jose M, .
    In: DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB.
    RePEc:cte:wbrepe:wb032506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Foreign Direct Investment, Transactions Linkages, and the Performance of the Domestic Sector. (2002). Munday, Max ; Driffield, Nigel ; Roberts, Annette.
    In: International Journal of the Economics of Business.
    RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:9:y:2002:i:3:p:335-351.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Institutional Efficiency, Monitoring Costs, and the Investment Share of FDI. (2002). Spiegel, Mark ; Aizenman, Joshua.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. International Technology Diffusion and Growth in the Manufacturing Sector of Developing Economies. (2002). Zachariadis, Marios ; Savvides, Andreas.
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsu:lsuwpp:2002-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Spillovers From Foreign Firms Through Worker Mobility: An Empirical Investigation. (2002). Strobl, Eric ; Görg, Holger.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Capital account liberalization, free long-term capital flows, financial crises and economic development. (2002). Singh, Ajit.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Direct Foreign Investments And Productivity Growth In Hungarian Firms, 1992-1999. (2001). Sgard, Jerome.
    In: William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:wdi:papers:2001-425.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Multinational Corporations as Catalyst for Industrial Development: The Case of Poland. (2001). Resmini, Laura ; Altomonte, Carlo.
    In: William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:wdi:papers:2001-368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Benefits and costs of international financial integration : theory and facts. (2001). Agénor, Pierre-Richard.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:2699.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Bridging the digital divide - how enterprise ownership and foreign competition affect Internet access in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. (2001). Clarke, George.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:2629.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. When Does Capital Account Liberalization Help More than It Hurts?. (2001). Wyplosz, Charles ; Eichengreen, Barry ; Arteta, Carlos.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:8414.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Direct Foreign Investments and Productivity Growth in Hungarian Firms, 1992-1999. (2001). Sgard, Jerome.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cii:cepidt:2001-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies. (2000). Konings, Jozef.
    In: William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:wdi:papers:2000-344.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Does Foreign Ownership Matter? Russian Experience. (2000). Ponomareva, Natalia ; Melentieva, Natalya ; Yudaeva, Ksenia ; Kozlov, Konstantin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfr:cefirw:w0005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Foreign Entry and Domestic Welfare: Can Market Discipline Be Excessive?. (2000). Bhattacharjea, Aditya.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:cde:cdewps:83.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Capital Controls and Financial Crises. (1999). Aizenman, Joshua.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:7398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 21:23:33 || Missing content? Let us know