create a website

The Value of a Like: Facebook, Viral Posts, and Campaign Finance in US Congressional Elections. (2023). Kowal, Michael.
In: Media and Communication.
RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:3:p:153-163.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 60

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Ansolabehere, S., & Snyder, J. M. (2002). The incum‐ bency advantage in U.S. elections: An analysis of state and federal offices, 1942–2000. Election Law Journal, 1(3), 315–338.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Ansolabehere, S., de Figueredo, J. M., & Snyder, J. M., Jr. (2003). Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 105–130.

  3. Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2018). Social media campaigning: Mobilization and fundraising on Facebook. Social Sci‐ ence Quarterly, 99(1), 185–200.

  4. Barber, M. J. (2016). Donation motivations: Testing theories of access and ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 148–159.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Barber, M. J., Canes‐Wrone, B., & Thrower, S. (2017). Ideologically sophisticated donors: Which candidates do individual contributors finance? American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 271–288.

  6. Barbera, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883–901.

  7. Bartels, L. M. (2010). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American polit‐ ics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 571–597.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2010). Social transmission, emotion, and the virality of online content. Wharton Research Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Berkman, M., & Eisenstein, J. (1999). State legislators as congressional candidates: The effects of prior experi‐ ence on legislative recruitment and fundraising. Polit‐ ical Research Quarterly, 52(3), 481–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bhati, A., & McDonnell, D. (2020). Success in an online giving day: The role of social media in fundrais‐ ing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(1), 74–92.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Blake, A., & Zubak‐Skees, C. (2022, July 21). GOP’s 2022 small‐dollar fundraising as Democats’ lead grows.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Bonica, A. (2016). Avenues of influence: On the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives. Business and Politics, 18(4),367–394.

  15. Broockman, D., & Kalla, J. (2016). Congressional officials grant access due to campaign contributions: A ran‐ domized field experiment. American Journal of Polit‐ ical Science, 60(3), 545–558.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Cashmore, P. (2009). YouTube: Why do we watch? CNN.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Confessore, N., Cohen, S., & Yourish, K. (2015, August 1). Small pool of rich donors dominates election giving.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Davis, S. (2020, October 22). “Fundraging” fuels demo‐ cratic money advanage over GOP in most races.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. (2013). More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantit‐ ative indicator of political behavior. PLOS One, 8(11), Article e79449.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Ensley, M. (2009). Individual campaign contributions and candidate ideology. Public Choice, 138, 221–238.

  21. Evans, H. K., & Clark, J. H. (2016). “You tweet like a girl!”: How female candidates campaign on Twitter. Amer‐ ican Politics Research, 44(2), 326–352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2013). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Fenno, R. (1978). Home style: House members in their dis‐ tricts. Little, Brown and Company.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Fiebert, M. S., Aliee, A., Yassami, H., & Dorethy, M. D. (2014). The life cycle of a Facebook post. The Open Psychology Journal, 7, 18–19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Fouirnaies, A., & Hall, A. B. (2014). The financial incum‐ bency advantage: Causes and consequences. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 711–724.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Francia, P., Herrnson, P., Green, J., Powell, L., & Wil‐ cox, C. (2003). The financiers of congressional elec‐ tions: Investors, ideologues, and intimates. Columbia University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Fu, S., & Howell, W. G. (2020). The behavioral con‐ sequences of public appeals: Evidence on campaign fundraising from the 2018 congressional elections. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 325–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. (1965). The structure of for‐ eign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba, and Cyprus crises in four Norwigian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Gimpel, J., Lee, F., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2008). The check is in the mail: Interdistrict funding flows in con‐ gressional elections. American Journal of Political Sci‐ ence, 52(2), 373–394.

  31. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the U.S. congress. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621.

  32. Gramlich, J. (2021). 10 facts about American and Facebook. Pew Research Center. https://www. pewresearch.org/fact‐tank/2021/06/01/facts‐about‐ americans‐and‐facebook Grayer, A., & Nobles, R. (2020, March 1). Bernie Sanders raised massive $46.5 million in February, campaign announces. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/ 01/politics/bernie‐sanders‐fundraising‐february/ index.html Grim, R., & Siddiqui, S. (2013, January 8). Call time for congress shows how fundraising dominates bleak work life. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost. com/entry/call‐time‐congressional‐fundraising_n_ Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner take all politics: How Washington made the rich richer—And turned its back on the middle class. Simon & Schuster.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Hall, R. L., & Wayman, F. W. (1990). Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Sci‐ ence Review, 84(3), 797–820.

  34. Han, Y., Lappas, T., & Sabnis, G. (2020). The import‐ ance of interactions between content characterist‐ ics and creator characteristics for studying virality in social media. Information Systems Research, 31(2), 576–588.

  35. Hansen, L. K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F. A., Colleoni, E., & Etter, M. (2011). Good friends, bans news—Affect and virality in Twitter. In Future Information Tech‐ nology: 6th International Conference, FutureTech 2011, Proceedings Part II (pp. 34–43). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hemphill, L., Russell, A., & Schopke‐Gonzalez, A. M. (2021). What drives U.S. congressional members’ policy attention on Twitter? Policy & Internet, 13(2), 233–256.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hersh, E. (2020). Politics is for power: How to move bey‐ ond political hobbyism, take action, and make real change. Scribner.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2017). Representativeness and motivations of the contemporary donorate: Res‐ ults from merged survey and administrative records. Political Behavior, 39, 3–29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hughes, A. (2017). 5 facts about U.S. political donations.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and tim‐ ing in strategic social media use. Political Communic‐ ations, 35(1), 8–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. La Raja, R. J., & Schaffner, B. F. (2015). Campaign finance and political polarization: When purists prevail. Uni‐ versity of Michigan Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2011). Twitter: The electoral connection? Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 419–436.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Malbin, M. (2012). 48% of president Obama’s 2011 money came from small donors—Better than doub‐ ling 2007. Romney’s small donors: 9%. Campaign Finance Institute. http://cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/ 12‐02‐08/Small_Donors_in_2011_Obama_s_Were_ Big_Romney_s_Not.aspx Mano, R. S. (2014). Social media, social causes, giving behavior and money contributions. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 287–293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. McCarty, N., Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Media and Communication, 2023, Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 153–163 Brown, C., Powell, L., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious money: Fundraising and contributing in presidential nomina‐ tion campaigns. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Navarro, A. (2022, July 20). ActBlue processed more than half a billion dollars in three‐month period. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/actblue‐ donations‐record‐second‐quarter‐fundraising Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/10/22/925892007/ fundraging‐fuels‐democratic‐money‐advantage‐ over‐gop‐in‐most‐races Desmarais, B. A., La Raja, R. J., & Kowal, M. S. (2014). The fates of challengers in U.S. house elections: The role of extended party networks in supporting candidates and shaping electoral outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 194–211.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch. org/fact‐tank/2017/05/17/5‐facts‐about‐u‐s‐ political‐donations Kowal, M. S. (2018). Corporate politicking, together: Trade association ties, lobbying, and campaign giving. Business and Politics, 20(1), 98–131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Russell, A. (2018a). The politics of prioritization: Senat‐ ors’ attention in 140 characters. The Forum, 16(2), 331–356.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Russell, A. (2018b). U.S. senators on Twitter: Asymmet‐ ric party rhetoric in 140 characters. American Politics Research, 46(4), 695–723.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Scarrow, S. E. (2007). Political finance in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 193–210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Straus, J. R., & Glassman, M. E. (2016a). Social media in congress: The impact of electronic media on member communications. Congressional Research Service.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Straus, J. R., & Glassman, M. E. (2016b). Social media in the house of representatives: Frequently asked ques‐ tions. Congressional Research Service.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. The mixed effects of candidate visits on campaign donations in the 2020 presidential election. Amer‐ ican Politics Research, 50(3), 320–325.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/ 2015/08/02/us/small‐pool‐of‐rich‐donors‐ dominates‐election‐giving.html Cook Political. (2022). Partisan vote index. https://www. cookpolitical.com/pvi‐0 Cowburn, A. (2020, October 7). Boris Johnson’s victory at 2019 general election cost conservatives over 16m, figures show. The Independent. https://www. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris‐johnson‐ election‐2019‐spending‐campaign‐conservatives‐ b859020.html CrowdTangle [Software] (2022). Meta.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost. com/politics/2022/07/21/gops‐2022‐small‐dollar‐ fundraising‐sputters‐democrats‐lead‐grows Bond, R. M., Farriss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., May‐ hew, C., Settle, J., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61‐million‐ person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(2012), 295–298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2014). Spill‐over effects between Facebook and on/offline political participation? Evid‐ ence from a two‐wave panel study. Journal of Inform‐ ation Technology & Politics, 11(3), 259–275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Waldman, P. (2014, April 4). How our campaign finance system compares to other countries. The American Prospect. https://prospect.org/power/campaign‐ finance‐system‐compares‐countries Yamamoto, M., & Morey, A. C. (2019). Incidental news exposure on social media: A campaign communica‐ tion mediation approach. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 1–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Yano, T., Yogatama, D., & Smith, N. A. (2013). A penny for your tweets: Campaign contributions and Capitol Hill microblogs. In Proceedings of the Seventh Interna‐ tional AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 737–740). ACM. About the Author Michael Kowal is an assistant professor of computational social science at the Stevens Institute of Technology.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Bank Lobbying: Regulatory Capture and Beyond. (2019). Lambert, Thomas ; Igan, Deniz.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2019/171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Towards a Political Theory of the Firm. (2017). Zingales, Luigi.
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aea:jecper:v:31:y:2017:i:3:p:113-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Lobbying on Regulatory Enforcement Actions: Evidence from Banking. (2016). Lambert, Thomas.
    In: Working Papers CEB.
    RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/228423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Lobbying, Inside and Out: How Special Interest Groups Influence Policy Choices. (2016). Wolton, Stephane.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Repeated Lobbying by Commercial Lobbyists and Special Interests. (2016). Groll, Thomas ; Ellis, Christopher J.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Politics in the interest of capital: A not-so-organized combat. (2015). Woll, Cornelia.
    In: MaxPo Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:maxpod:152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Regional Trade Agreements and Cross-Border Lobbying: Empirical Evidence from the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement Negotiations. (2015). Stoyanov, Andrey.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:yca:wpaper:2015_4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The determinants of effective corporate lobbying. (2015). Borghesi, Richard ; Chang, Kiyoung.
    In: Journal of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:spr:jecfin:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:606-624.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Electoral Contributions and the Cost of Unpopularity. (2015). pavesi, filippo ; Bassetti, Thomas.
    In: Marco Fanno Working Papers.
    RePEc:pad:wpaper:0195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Is There a Market for Peerages? Can Donations Buy You a British Peerage? A Study in the Link Between Party Political Funding and Peerage Nominations, 2005-14. (2015). Radford, Simon ; Thevoz, Seth Alexander ; Mell, Andrew .
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:744.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. How do elections affect international cooperation? Evidence from environmental treaty participation. (2015). Sauquet, Alexandre ; Cazals, Antoine.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:162:y:2015:i:3:p:263-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Income distribution and political participation: a multilevel analysis. (2015). Gaeta, Giuseppe ; Ercolano, Salvatore ; Cicatiello, Lorenzo.
    In: Empirica.
    RePEc:kap:empiri:v:42:y:2015:i:2:p:447-479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Lobbying on Regulatory Enforcement Actions: Evidence from Banking. (2015). Lambert, Thomas.
    In: HIT-REFINED Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hit:remfce:28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Forging a new Mittelstand compromise : lobbying strategies and business influence after the financial crisis. (2015). Keller, Eileen .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:eui:euiwps:mwp2015/19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Revisiting the link between PAC contributions and lobbying expenditures. (2015). Lake, James.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:37:y:2015:i:c:p:86-101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Congressional influence as a determinant of subprime lending. (2015). Kahn, Matthew ; Gabriel, Stuart ; Vaughn, Ryan K..
    In: Journal of Housing Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhouse:v:28:y:2015:i:c:p:91-102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The CEO as chief political officer: Managerial discretion and corporate political activity. (2015). Dahan, Nicolas M ; Hadani, Michael ; Doh, Jonathan P.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:68:y:2015:i:11:p:2330-2337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Disappointment and Public action: Albert Hirschman’s ways of complicating economic theory. (2015). Bianchi, Marina.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:csn:wpaper:2015-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Modern Lobbying: A Relationship Market. (2015). , Maggiemckinley.
    In: ifo DICE Report.
    RePEc:ces:ifodic:v:13:y:2015:i:3:p:15-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Corporate distress and lobbying: Evidence from the Stimulus Act. (2014). Adelino, Manuel ; Dinc, Serdar I..
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:114:y:2014:i:2:p:256-272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Conflicts of interest distort public evaluations: Evidence from NCAA football coaches. (2014). Kotchen, Matthew ; Potoski, Matthew.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:107:y:2014:i:pa:p:51-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Market-based Lobbying: Evidence from Advertising Spending in Italy. (2014). La Ferrara, Eliana ; Knight, Brian ; Durante, Ruben ; DellaVigna, Stefano.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. STATIC COMMON AGENCY AND POLITICAL INFLUENCE: AN EVALUATIVE SURVEY. (2014). Mallard, Graham.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:28:y:2014:i:1:p:17-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Dynamics of Firm Lobbying. (2014). Lincoln, William ; Kerr, William ; Mishra, Prachi.
    In: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
    RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:343-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Campaign Spending and Electoral Competition: Towards More Policy Relevant Research. (2013). Milyo, Jeffrey.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Bailout for sale? The vote to save Wall Street. (2013). Dorsch, Michael.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:155:y:2013:i:3:p:211-228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Market-based Lobbying: Evidence from Advertising Spending in Italy. (2013). La Ferrara, Eliana ; Knight, Brian ; Durante, Ruben ; DellaVigna, Stefano.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. When does cooperation win and why? Political cycles and participation in international environmental agreements. (2013). Sauquet, Alexandre ; Cazals, Antoine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00903653.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Campaign donation and government contracts in Brazilian states. (2013). Barbosa, Klenio ; Arvate, Paulo ; Fuzitani, Eric ; Barbosa, Klenio de Souza, .
    In: Textos para discussão.
    RePEc:fgv:eesptd:336.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. From Green Users to Green Voters. (2013). Rode, Johannes ; Comin, Diego.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9573.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Institutional ownership monitoring and corporate political activity: Governance implications. (2012). Hadani, Michael.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:65:y:2012:i:7:p:944-950.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Choosing a Champion: Party Membership and Policy Platform. (2012). Meagher, Kieron ; Anderson, Simon.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8941.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Lobby Interaction and Trade Policy. (2010). Chesnokova, Tatyana.
    In: School of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:adl:wpaper:2010-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Integrated Political Strategy. (2009). de Figueiredo, John M..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Largent fait-il le bonheur électoral ?. (2008). Foucault, Martial.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-00339814.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Is Protection Really For Sale? A Survey And Directions For Future Research. (2007). Krishna, Kala ; Katayama, Hajime ; Imai, Susumu.
    In: Working Paper.
    RePEc:qed:wpaper:1151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Congruence Among Voters and Contributions to Political Campaigns. (2007). Panova, Elena.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:lacicr:0722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Legislative Lobbying under Political Uncertainty. (2007). Zaporozhets, Vera ; le Breton, Michel.
    In: IDEI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ide:wpaper:7934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Protection For Sale Or Surge Protection?. (2006). Krishna, Kala ; Katayama, Hajime ; Imai, Susumu.
    In: Working Paper.
    RePEc:qed:wpaper:1114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Side Effects of Campaign Finance Reform. (2006). Dahm, Matthias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:06.15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Buy, Lobby or Sue: Interest Groups Participation in Policy Making - A Selective Survey. (2006). spiller, pablo ; Liao, Sanny.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:12209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Side Effects of Campaign Finance Reform. (2005). Dahm, Matthias.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Judicial Lobbying: The Politics of Labor Law Constitutional Interpretation. (2005). Tommasi, Mariano ; spiller, pablo ; Iaryczower, Matias.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Rules of Origin as Export Subsidies. (2005). Suwa-Eisenmann, Akiko ; Estevadeordal, Antoni ; Suwaeisenmann, Akiko.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:4999.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Essays in Political Influence. (2005). Iaryczower, Matias.
    In: Levine's Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:cla:levarc:618897000000000945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Is Private Campaign Finance a Good Thing? Estimates of the Potential Informational Benefits. (2005). Snyder, James ; Puglisi, Riccardo ; Prat, Andrea.
    In: Levine's Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:cla:levarc:122247000000000960.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Judicial Lobbying: The Politics of Labor Law, Constitutional Interpretation. Argentina 1935-1998. (2004). Tommasi, Mariano ; spiller, pablo ; Iaryczower, Matias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:sad:wpaper:73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Political Contribution Caps and Lobby Formation: Theory and Evidence. (2004). Stratmann, Thomas ; Limão, Nuno ; Drazen, Allan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The Timing, Intensity, and Composition of Interest Group Lobbying: An Analysis of Structural Policy Windows in the States. (2004). de Figueriedo, John M..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10588.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The Jeffords Effect. (2004). Jayachandran, Seema.
    In: UCLA Economics Online Papers.
    RePEc:cla:uclaol:297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 01:38:02 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.