create a website

Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy. (2022). Verbeek, Bart-Jaap.
In: Politics and Governance.
RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:3:p:110-120.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 48

References cited by this document

Cocites: 26

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. (2018). World Investment Report 2018: Invest‐ ment and new industrial policies. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official‐document/ wir2018_en.pdf van Apeldoorn, B. (2009). The contradictions of “embed‐ ded neoliberalism” and Europe’s multi‐level legiti‐ macy crisis: The European project and its limits. In B. van Apeldoorn, J. Drahokoupil, & L. Horn (Eds.), Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European gov‐ ernance: From Lisbon to Lisbon (pp. 21–43). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. (2019). Possible reform of investor‐state dispute settlement (ISDS): Submission from the European Union and its Member States (A/CN.9/WG.III/ WP.159/Add.1). United Nations General Assembly.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. (Eds.). (2010). Backlash against investment arbitra‐ tion. Kluwer Law International.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Alternative Trade Mandate. (2013). Trade: Time for a new vision. https://www.somo.nl/wp‐content/uploads/ 2014/03/trade‐time_for_a_new_vision‐print.pdf Ames, P. (2015, September 17). ISDS: The most toxic acronym in Europe. Politico. https://www.politico. eu/article/isds‐the‐most‐toxic‐acronym‐in‐europe Babic, M. (2020). Let’s talk about the interregnum: Gram‐ sci and the crisis of the liberal world order. Interna‐ tional Affairs, 96(3), 767–786.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Barbière, C. (2015, January 15). France and Germany to form united front against ISDS. EURACTIV. https:// www.euractiv.com/section/trade‐society/news/ france‐and‐germany‐to‐form‐united‐front‐against‐ isds Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. N. S., & Waibel, M. (2017). The political economy of the investment treaty regime. Oxford University Press.

  7. Brown, C. (2018). The European Union’s approach to investment dispute settlement [Speech transcript].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. BusinessEurope. (2009). Putting Europe back on track: European growth and jobs strategy post‐2010. https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/ media/imported/2009‐02126‐E.pdf BusinessEurope. (2015). BusinessEurope’s assessment of the European Commission’s proposal on a new Invest‐ ment Court System. https://www.businesseurope. eu/sites/buseur/files/media/position_papers/rex/ 2015‐10‐23_assessment_of_commission_proposal_ on_a_new_investment_court_system.pdf Cahill, D. (2014). The end of laissez‐faire? On the durabil‐ ity of embedded neoliberalism. Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Crisp, J. (2015, September 8). Commission won’t ask EU judges to decide on legality of ISDS. EURACTIV. https://www.euractiv.com/section/trade‐society/ news/commission‐won‐t‐ask‐eu‐judges‐to‐decide‐ on‐legality‐of‐isds Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non‐death of neo‐ liberalism. Polity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. De Bièvre, D., & Poletti, A. (2020). Towards explaining varying degrees of politicization of EU trade agree‐ ment negotiations. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 243–253.

  11. De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2014). The European Commis‐ sion’s neoliberal trade discourse since the crisis: Legit‐ imizing continuity through subtle discursive change. The British Journal of Politics and International Rela‐ tions, 16(1), 149–167.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. De Ville, F., & Siles‐Brügge, G. (2015). TTIP: The truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part‐ nership. Polity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. de Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). Intro‐ duction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics, 39(1), 3–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Diependaele, L., De Ville, F., & Sterckx, S. (2019). Assess‐ ing the normative legitimacy of investment arbitra‐ tion: The EU’s investment court system. New Political Economy, 24(1), 37–61.

  15. Dietz, T., Dotzauer, M., & Cohen, E. S. (2019). The legiti‐ macy crisis of investor‐state arbitration and the new EU investment court system. Review of International Political Economy, 26(4), 749–772.

  16. europa.eu/legal‐content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX %3A52010DC0343 European Commission. (2010b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Commit‐ tee and the Committee of the Regions. Trade, growth and world affairs: Trade policy as a core component of the EU’s 2020 strategy (COM/2010/0612 final).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. European Commission. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/ doclib/docs/2018/july/tradoc_157112.pdf Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Friends of the Earth Europe. (2014). Hidden costs of EU trade deals: Investor–state dispute settle‐ ment cases taken against EU member states. https:// www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/publications/ hidden_cost_of_eu_trade_deals_0.pdf Friends of the Earth Europe. (2018). Setting course for sustainable trade: A new trade agenda that serves people and the environment. https://friendsofthe Politics and Governance, 2022, Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 110–120 earth.eu/wp‐content/uploads/2018/04/trade_ alternatives_designreport_v6_ld.pdf Gheyle, N. (2020). Huddle up! Exploring domestic coali‐ tion formation dynamics in the differentiated politi‐ cization of TTIP. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 301–311.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Lawrence and Wishart.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Hay, C., & Rosamond, B. (2002). Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of eco‐ nomic imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 147–167.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Herranz‐Surrallés, A. (2020). “Authority shifts” in global governance: Intersecting politicizations and the reform of investor–state arbitration. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 336–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. https://eur‐lex.europa.eu/legal‐content/en/ALL/ ?uri=CELEX:52010DC0612 European Commission. (2013). Fact sheet: Invest‐ ment protection and investor‐to‐state dispute settlement in EU agreements. https://www.italaw.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. https://undocs.org/en/A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.159/Add.1 United Nations Conference on Trade and Develop‐ ment. (2009). Assessing the impact of the cur‐ rent financial and economic crisis on global FDI flows. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/ files/official‐document/webdiaeia20091_en.pdf United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Hunya, G., & Stöllinger, R. (2009). Foreign direct invest‐ ment flows between the EU and the BRICS (Research Report No. 358). The Vienna Institute for Interna‐ tional Economic Studies.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Hurd, I. (2019). Legitimacy and contestation in global gov‐ ernance: Revisiting the folk theory of international institutions. The Review of International Organiza‐ tions, 14(4), 717–729.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Polity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Jessop, B. (2016). The heartlands of neoliberalism and the rise of the austerity state. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. McLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 410–421). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Jessop, B., & Sum, N.‐L. (2006). Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Lenz, T., & Viola, L. A. (2017). Legitimacy and institu‐ tional change in international organisations: A cogni‐ tive approach. Review of International Studies, 43(5), 939–961.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Meunier, S., & Nicolaidis, K. (2019). The geopoliticization of European trade and investment policy. JCMS: Jour‐ nal of Common Market Studies, 57(S1), 103–113.

  32. Monbiot, G. (2013, November 4). This transatlantic trade deal is a full‐frontal assault on democracy. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/comment isfree/2013/nov/04/us‐trade‐deal‐full‐frontal‐ assault‐on‐democracy Ohoven, M. (2014, October 3). A resounding “no” to investment protection for CETA and TTIP. Weekly Trends. https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/ Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Perrone, N. M. (2019). The “invisible” local communities: Foreign investor obligations, inclusiveness, and the international investment regime. American Journal of International Law, 113, 16–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Perrone, N. M. (2021). Investment treaties and the legal imagination: How foreign investors play by their own rules. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Poulsen, L. N. S. (2015). Bounded rationality and eco‐ nomic diplomacy: The politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Poulsen, L. S., & Hufbauer, G. C. (2011). Foreign direct investment in times of crisis (Working Paper No. 11–3). Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com/publications/ working‐papers/foreign‐direct‐investment‐times‐ crisis Roberts, A. (2018). Incremental, systemic, and paradig‐ matic reform of investor‐state arbitration. American Journal of International Law, 112(3), 410–432.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.

  39. Seattle to Brussels Network. (2015). ISDS: Courting foreign investors. Why the Commission’s proposal for an “Investment Court System” still fails to address the key problems of foreign investors’ privileges. http://www.s2bnetwork.org/wp‐content/uploads/ 2015/10/S2B_ISDS.pdf Seattle to Brussels Network, Corporate Europe Obser‐ vatory, & Transnational Institute. (2013). A transat‐ lantic corporate bill of rights: Investor privileges in EU–US trade deal threaten public interest and democracy. https://corporateeurope.org/sites/ default/files/attachments/transatlantic‐corporate‐ bill‐of‐rights‐oct13.pdf Siles‐Brügge, G. (2017). Transatlantic investor protection as a threat to democracy: The potency and limits of an emotive frame. Cambridge Review of Interna‐ tional Affairs, 30(5/6), 464–488.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Sornarajah, M. (2016). An international investment court: Panacea or purgatory? (Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 180). Columbia Center on Sustainable Invest‐ ment. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/ doi/10.7916/D8RN389W Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legit‐ imation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organi‐ zations, 14(4), 581–606.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Tienhaara, K. (2011). Regulatory chill and the threat of Politics and Governance, 2022, Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 110–120 arbitration: A view from political science. In C. Brown & K. Miles (Eds.), Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration (pp. 606–628). Cambridge University Press. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Van der Pijl, K. (2012). The making of an Atlantic ruling class. Verso.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Van Harten, G. (2007). Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press.

  45. Van Harten, G. (2016). ISDS in the revised CETA: Pos‐ itive steps, but is it a “gold standard”? Centre for International Governance Innovation. https:// www.cigionline.org/publications/isds‐revised‐ceta‐ positive‐steps‐it‐gold‐standard Van Harten, G., & Schneiderman, D. (2010). Pub‐ lic Statement on the international investment regime—31 August 2010. Osgoode Hall Law School. https://www.osgoode.yorku.ca/public‐statement‐ international‐investment‐regime‐31‐august‐2010 Vastardis, A. Y. (2018). Justice bubbles for the privileged: A critique of the investor‐state dispute settlement proposals for the EU’s investment agreements. Lon‐ don Review of International Law, 6(2), 279–297.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Verbeek, B. J. (2021). The making of the EU invest‐ ment policy: A critical political economy perspec‐ tive [Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Wigger, A. (2019). The new EU industrial policy: Authori‐ tarian neoliberal structural adjustment and the case for alternatives. Globalizations, 16(3), 353–369.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Wigger, A., & Buch‐Hansen, H. (2014). Explaining (miss‐ ing) regulatory paradigm shifts: EU competition regu‐ lation in times of economic crisis. New Political Econ‐ omy, 19(1), 113–137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Identifying the factors influencing the development of bilateral investment treaties with health safeguards: a Machine Learning-based link prediction approach. (2025). Patay, Dori ; Thow, Anne Marie ; Lu, Haohui ; Uddin, Shahadat ; Alschner, Wolfgang ; Rippin, Holly ; Hoang, Tien Dat ; Gomes, Fabio ; Frank, Nicholas ; Tissaoui, Takwa.
    In: Journal of Computational Social Science.
    RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00341-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Assessing pathways for pursuing coherence between local implementation of emerging alternative economic approaches and international investment law. (2025). Gleason, Ted.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:232:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925000497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Terminating to Renegotiate? Strategic Exit from International Investment Treaties. (2024). Huikuri, Tuuli-Anna.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ascmh_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Terminating to Renegotiate? Strategic Exit from International Investment Treaties. (2024). Huikuri, Tuuli-Anna.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ascmh.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Relationship between Transparency Obligations and Foreign Investment in Renewable Energies: Realising the Potential Role of IIAs. (2024). Qian, Xuming ; Ghaziani, Mohammad Akefi.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2721-:d:1407997.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Protecting home: how firms’ investment plans affect the formation of bilateral investment treaties. (2023). Kim, Seung Jun.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:18:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11558-023-09486-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Bureaucratic capacity and preference attainment in international economic negotiations. (2023). Berge, Tarald Gulseth ; Stiansen, Oyvind.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:18:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11558-022-09475-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Constraints and incentives in the investment regime: How bargaining power shapes BIT reform. (2023). Huikuri, Tuuli-Anna.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:18:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11558-022-09473-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Class Struggle and International Economic Institutions: The Origins of the GATT and “Embedded Liberalism”. (2023). Bachand, Remi.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:193-202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Class Struggle and International Economic Institutions: The Origins of the GATT and “Embedded Liberalism”. (2023). Bachand, Rmi.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:1:p:193-202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Public health clauses in international investment agreements: Sword or shield?. (2023). Alschner, Wolfgang ; Aljunied, Faisal ; Thow, Anne Marie.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:260-269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Sustainable Development in Chilean International Investment Agreements. (2022). Polanco, Rodrigo.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:wti:papers:1376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Why de‐judicialize? Explaining state preferences on judicialization in World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body and Investor‐to‐State Dispute Settlement reforms. (2022). Basedow, Johann Robert.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:16:y:2022:i:4:p:1362-1381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Major features of Ethiopia’s new investment law: an appraisal of their policy implications. (2022). Hagos, Bereket Alemayehu.
    In: UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal.
    RePEc:unc:tncjou:86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy. (2022). Verbeek, Bart-Jaap.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:110-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy. (2022). Verbeek, Bart-Jaap.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:3:p:110-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Cross-Border Institutions and the Globalization of Innovation. (2021). Meier, Jean-Marie ; Bian, BO ; Xu, Ting.
    In: LawFin Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:lawfin:23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Can the G20 serve as a launchpad for a multilateral investment agreement?. (2021). Liu, Wan-Hsin ; Berger, Axel.
    In: Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:242003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. After the BITs: The uncertain future of international investment governance. (2021). Kabrt, Martin.
    In: Occasional Publications - Chapters in Edited Volumes.
    RePEc:cnb:ocpubc:geo2021/2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Can the G20 serve as a launchpad for a multilateral investment agreement?. (2021). Liu, Wan-Hsin ; Berger, Axel.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:44:y:2021:i:8:p:2284-2302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The EUs International Investment Policy ten years on: the Policy‐Making Implications of Unintended Competence Transfers. (2021). Basedow, Robert.
    In: Journal of Common Market Studies.
    RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:59:y:2021:i:3:p:643-660.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Policy Options to Mitigate Political Risk and Attract FDI. (2020). Kher, Priyanka ; Chun, Dongwook.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:34380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Strategic Use of International Investment Law in Colombia – Textiles: Navigating within the International Regime Complex for Development. (2020). Rafael, Tamayo-Alvarez.
    In: The Law and Development Review.
    RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:31-58:n:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Association of Economic Crises and Investor-State Arbitration Cases. (2019). Leibrecht, Markus ; Bellak, Christian.
    In: Department of Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wiw:wus005:6922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Extractive Industries and Investor–State Arbitration: Enforcing Home Standards Abroad. (2019). Barrera, Enrique Boone.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6963-:d:294890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Legalization, diplomacy, and development: Do investment treaties de-politicize investment disputes?. (2018). Jandhyala, Srividya ; Skovgaard, Lauge N ; Gertz, Geoffrey.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:107:y:2018:i:c:p:239-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 22:32:10 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.