create a website

Oversee and Punish: Understanding the Fight Against Corruption Involving Government Workers in Brazil. (2020). Odilla, Fernanda.
In: Politics and Governance.
RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:140-152.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 40

References cited by this document

Cocites: 33

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Corruption Control in the Developed World. (2020). Piattoni, Simona ; di Mascio, Fabrizio.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:72-77.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. (2014). Enforcement and public corruption: Evidence from the American States. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 30(2), 306–338.

  2. Anechiarico, F., & Jacobs, J. B. (1996). The pursuit of absolute integrity: How corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and the compensation of enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 1–19.

  4. Bersch, K., Praça, S., & Taylor, M. M. (2016). Bureaucratic capacity and political autonomy within national states: Mapping the archipelago of excellence in Brazil. In M. Centeno, A. Kohli, D. Yashar, & D. Mistree (Eds.), States in the developing world (pp. 157–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Brazilian Presidency. (2019). Decree 9681/2019. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/ _Ato2019-2022/2019/Decreto/D9681.htm Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–668.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Davis, J. (2004). Corruption in public service delivery: Experience from South Asia’s water and sanitation sector. World Development, 32(1), 53–71.

  11. Fielding, N., & Thomas, H. (2001). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (2nd ed., pp. 123–143). London: Sage.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Fjeldstad, O. H. (2003). Fighting fiscal corruption: Lessons from the Tanzania revenue authority. Public Administration and Development, 23(2), 165–175.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Fleisher, D. (2002). Corruption in Brazil: Defining, measuring, and reducing (Report of the CSIS Americas Program) . Washington, DC: The CSIS Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Fox, J. A. (2007). Accountability politics: Power and voice in rural Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  15. Gans-Morse, J., Borges, M., Makarin, A., Mannah Blankson, T., Nickow, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. World Development, 105, 171–188.

  16. Geddes, B. (1994). Politician’s dilemma: Building state capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Grindle, M. S. (2012). Jobs for the boys: Patronage and the state in comparative perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Huntington, S. P. (1989). The trilateral crisis of democracy. Executive Intelligence Review EIR, 16(21).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Laffont, J. J., & Meleu, M. (1997). Reciprocal supervision, collusion and organizational design. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(4), 519–540.

  21. Laffont, J. J., & Rochet, J. C. (1997). Collusion in organizations. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(4), 485–495.

  22. Loughry, M., & Tosi, H. (2008). Performance implications of peer monitoring. Organization Science, 19(6), 876–890.

  23. Macaulay, F. (2002). Problems of police oversight in Brazil (Working Paper CBS-33-02). Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Brazilian Studies.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Mainwaring, S., & Welna, C. (Eds.). (2003). Democratic accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Meyer-Sahling, J. H., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2016). Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: The perspective of public officials from five East European countries. Public Administration, 94(4), 1105–1123.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. O’Donnell, G. (1999). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, & M. Plattner (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 29–52). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Office of the Comptroller General. (2014). Administrative Penalties and Reinstatements Enforced from January 2003 to November 2014 [Datafiles and codebooks]. Unpublished raw data.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Oliveros, V., & Schuster, C. (2017). Merit, tenure, and bureaucratic behaviour: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 51(6), 759–792.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Editors’ introduction. In J. L. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Politics and Governance, 2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 140–152 Gingerich, D. (2013). Political institutions and partydirected corruption in South America: Stealing for the team. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71.

  34. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193–240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Peer monitoring and credit markets. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 351–366.

  37. Tirole, J. (1993). Collusion and the theory of organizations. In J. Laffont (Ed.), Advances in economic theory: Sixth world congress (pp. 151–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A crossnational study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.

  39. van Rijckeghem, C., & Weder, B. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: Do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much. Journal of Development Economics, 65(2), 307–331.

  40. Vasconcellos de Figueiredo, F. O. (2016). Building up a convenient accountability: How the ‘anti-corruption’ law in Brazil was put into force. Brasiliana: Journal for Brazilian Studies, 4(2), 550–578.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does corruption discriminate? Racial opportunity gap in the United States. (2025). Hoover, Gary ; Dincer, Oguzhan.
    In: Southern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:wly:soecon:v:91:y:2025:i:3:p:768-779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Anti-corruption campaign in China: an empirical investigation. (2024). Milanovic, Branko ; Lin, Yaoqi ; Yang, LI.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:124073.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Anti-corruption campaign in China: An empirical investigation. (2024). Milanovic, Branko ; Yang, LI ; Lin, Yaoqi.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:85:y:2024:i:c:s0176268024000612.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Exploring the dynamics of corruption perceptions in sustained anti-corruption campaigns: a survey experiment in China. (2023). Ye, Zhipeng ; Shu, Zhan ; Pan, Yating.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02084-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How Political Culture Shapes Horizontal Accountability Outcomes: Evidence from 62 Countries. (2023). Rauh, William Jonathan ; Tomic, Slobodan.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:uf3nw_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Political Culture Shapes Horizontal Accountability Outcomes: Evidence from 62 Countries. (2023). Rauh, William Jonathan ; Tomic, Slobodan.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:uf3nw.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Effects of public sector wages on corruption: Wage inequality matters. (2023). Lokshin, Michael ; Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ; Kolchin, Vladimir ; Demirgu-Kunt, Asli.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:51:y:2023:i:3:p:941-959.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Effects of Public Sector Wages on Corruption : Wage Inequality Matters. (2021). Lokshin, Michael ; Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ; Kolchin, Vladimir.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9643.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Is justice blind? Evidence from federal corruption convictions. (2021). Davis, Lewis ; White, K R.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:186:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-019-00756-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Shelter in place? Depends on the place: Corruption and social distancing in American states. (2021). Gillanders, Robert ; Dincer, Oguzhan.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:269:y:2021:i:c:s0277953620307887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Regulation and Corruption: Evidence from the United States. (2021). Choudhury, Sanchari.
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:83:y:2021:i:4:p:897-934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Shelter in Place? Depends on the Place: Corruption and Social Distancing in American States. (2020). Gillanders, Robert ; Dincer, Oguzhan.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:100746.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Who takes bribes and how much? Evidence from the China Corruption Conviction Databank. (2020). Hillman, Arye ; Aidt, Toke ; Qijun, Liu.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:133:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x2030111x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The effects of federal regulations on corruption in U.S. States. (2020). Dincer, Oguzhan ; Gunalp, Burak.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:65:y:2020:i:c:s0176268020300720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Do privately-owned prisons increase incarceration rates?. (2020). Rohla, Ryne ; Galinato, Gregmar.
    In: Labour Economics.
    RePEc:eee:labeco:v:67:y:2020:i:c:s0927537120301123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Polarization and corruption in America. (2020). Pickering, Andrew ; Melki, Mickael.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:124:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120300295.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Oversee and Punish: Understanding the Fight Against Corruption Involving Government Workers in Brazil. (2020). Odilla, Fernanda.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:140-152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Oversee and Punish: Understanding the Fight Against Corruption Involving Government Workers in Brazil. (2020). Odilla, Fernanda.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:140-152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Quality of Legal Systems and Property Rights by State: A Ranking and Their Implications for Economic Freedom. (2020). Murphy, Ryan H.
    In: Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:ags:jrapmc:339940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Is it the gums, teeth or the bite? Effectiveness of dimensions of enforcement in curbing corruption. (2019). Saunoris, James ; Goel, Rajeev ; Capasso, Salvatore.
    In: Economics of Governance.
    RePEc:spr:ecogov:v:20:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10101-019-00228-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Does corruption hinder investment? Evidence from Russian regions. (2019). Zakharov, Nikita.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:56:y:2019:i:c:p:39-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Does corruption slow down innovation? Evidence from a cointegrated panel of U.S. states. (2019). Dincer, Oguzhan.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:56:y:2019:i:c:p:1-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Do Privately-Owned Prisons Increase Incarceration Rates?. (2018). Rohla, Ryne ; Galinato, Gregmar.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:wsuwpa:2018_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. (2018). Mannah-Blankson, Theresa ; Makarin, Alexey ; Borges, Mariana ; Gans-Morse, Jordan ; Zhang, Dong ; Nickow, Andre.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:105:y:2018:i:c:p:171-188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Public-sector wages and corruption: An empirical study. (2018). Chen, Yanting ; Liu, Qijun.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:54:y:2018:i:c:p:189-197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Does institutional quality condition the effect of bank regulations and supervision on bank stability? Evidence from emerging and developing economies. (2018). Nguyen, Thanh Cong ; Kalyvas, Antonios ; Bermpei, Theodora.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:59:y:2018:i:c:p:255-275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Is it the Gums, Teeth or the Bite? Effectiveness of Dimensions of Enforcement in Curbing Corruption. (2018). Saunoris, James ; Goel, Rajeev ; Capasso, Salvatore.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Institutional Quality and Public Debt Accumulation: An Empirical Analysis. (2017). Ahmed, Zidi ; Tarek, Ben Ali.
    In: International Economic Journal.
    RePEc:taf:intecj:v:31:y:2017:i:3:p:415-435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Political importance and its relation to the federal prosecution of public corruption. (2017). Pavlik, Jamie Bologna.
    In: Constitutional Political Economy.
    RePEc:kap:copoec:v:28:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10602-017-9243-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Polarization and Corruption in America. (2016). Pickering, Andrew ; Melki, Mickael.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:yor:yorken:16/09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Corruption at the Grassroots-level: What Can We Know About Corruption?. (2015). Schulze, Günther ; Lambsdorff, Johann Graf.
    In: Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik).
    RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:235:y:2015:i:2:p:100-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Antecedents and Effects of Corruption - A Reassessment of Current (Empirical) Findings. (2014). Dimant, Eugen.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:60947.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Measuring Public Corruption in the United States: Evidence from Administrative Records of Federal Prosecutions. (2013). Milyo, Jeffrey ; Cordis, Adriana.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1322.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 21:56:48 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.