create a website

Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2023). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
In: CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb).
RePEc:cpm:docweb:2308.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 55

References cited by this document

Cocites: 21

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aguiar, F., Becker, A., & Miller, L. (2013). Whose impartiality? an experimental study of veiled stakeholders, involved spectators and detached observers. Economics & Philosophy, 29(2), 155–174.

  2. Akbaş, M., Ariely, D., & Yuksel, S. (2019). When is inequality fair? an experiment on the effect of procedural justice and agency. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 161, 114–127.

  3. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of public Economics, 89(5-6), 897–931.

  4. Alesina, A., Miano, A., & Stantcheva, S. (2023). Immigration and redistribution. The Review of Economic Studies, 90(1), 1–39.

  5. Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., & Teso, E. (2018). Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review, 108(2), 521–54.

  6. Almås, I., Bonn, C., Cappelen, A., Cappelen, C., & Tungodden, B. (2022). Inequality acceptance in china: fairness views and policy attitudes in a socialist market economy. Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., & Tungodden, B. (2020). Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: Are americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than scandinavians ? Journal of Political Economy, 128(5), 1753–1788.

  8. Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E. O., & Tungodden, B. (2021). Fairness across the world: Preferences and beliefs (Tech. Rep.). Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. An, W., & Ye, M. (2017). Mind the gap: Disparity in redistributive preference between political elites and the public in china. European Journal of Political Economy, 50, 75–91.

  10. Andre, P. (2021). Shallow meritocracy: An experiment on fairness views (Tech. Rep.). ECONtribute Discussion Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bartling, B., Cappelen, A. W., Hermes, H., & Tungodden, B. (2023). Free to fail? paternalistic preferences in the united states. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper(09).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bortolotti, S., Soraperra, I., Sutter, M., & Zoller, C. (2017). Too lucky to be true-fairness views under the shadow of cheating.

  13. Cai, H., Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., Wang, C., Carvallo, M., Xu, Y., . . . Jackson, L. E. (2011). Tactical self-enhancement in china: Is modesty at the service of selfenhancement in east asian culture? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 59–64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Cappelen, A. W., Falch, R., Huang, Z., & Tungodden, B. (2022). Acceptance of inequality between children: Large-scale experimental evidence from china and norway. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper(10).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Cappelen, A. W., Moene, K. O., Skjelbred, S.-E., & Tungodden, B. (2023). The merit primacy effect. The Economic Journal, 133(651), 951–970.

  16. Cappelen, A. W., Mollerstrom, J., Reme, B.-A., & Tungodden, B. (2022). A meritocratic origin of egalitarian behaviour. The Economic Journal, 132(646), 2101–2117.

  17. Chen, N. Y., Huang, Y., & Mo, Z. (2022, March). Money is Justice: Experimental Evidence on Non-meritocratic Redistributive Preferences in China. Retrieved from https://shs .hal.science/halshs-03496033 (working paper or preprint) Chen, S., Fan, X., & Huang, Z. (2022). Noble no more: Keju, institutional commitment, and political purges (Tech. Rep.). Working paper, Fudan University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Chen, T., Kung, J. K.-s., & Ma, C. (2020). Long live keju! the persistent effects of china’s civil examination system. The economic journal, 130(631), 2030–2064.

  19. Chen, X., & Schøyen, Ø. (2022). Rejecting non-paternalist motivation: An experimental test. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(3), 339–345.

  20. Chen, Y., Wang, H., & Yang, D. (2017). Salience of history and the preference for redistribution. Available at SSRN 2717651.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of public Economics, 83(1), 83–107.

  22. Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112.

  23. Fischbacher, U., Grammling, D., Hausfeld, J., & Zíka, V. (2023). Identity breeds inequality: Evidence from a laboratory experiment on redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 222, 104866.

  24. Frese, M., & Gielnik, M. M. (2014). The psychology of entrepreneurship. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 413–438.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Penguin UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83.

  27. Ho, P.-t. (1962). The ladder of success in imperial china. In The ladder of success in imperial china. Columbia University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Howlett, Z. M., Khanna, T., & Szonyi, M. (2022). The national college entrance examination and the myth of meritocracy in post-mao china. Making Meritocracy: Lessons from China and India, from Antiquity to the Present, 206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Hoy, C., & Mager, F. (2021). Why are relatively poor people not more supportive of redistribution ? evidence from a randomized survey experiment across ten countries. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(4), 299–328.

  30. Huang, X. (2019). Social cleavages and preferences for government redistribution in contemporary china. Studies in Comparative International Development, 54(3), 415– 450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Huang, Z., Shi, L., & Wu, J. (2023). Fairness preference of preschoolers and the effects of family background in china. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311221149039.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. International, S. S. (2017). Zoom sur la chine. Internal Document.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Kao, J. C., Lü, X., & Queralt, D. (2022). Do gains in political representation sweeten tax reform in china? it depends on who you ask. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Karadja, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Seim, D. (2017). Richer (and holier) than thou? the effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 201–212.

  35. Konow, J., Saijo, T., & Akai, K. (2020). Equity versus equality: Spectators, stakeholders and groups. Journal of economic psychology, 77, 102171.

  36. Kuziemko, I., Norton, M. I., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1478–1508.

  37. Laouenan, M., Bhargava, P., Eyméoud, J.-B., Gergaud, O., Plique, G., & Wasmer, E. (2022). A cross-verified database of notable people, 3500bc-2018ad. Scientific Data, 9(1), 290.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Larson, R. B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), 534–547.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? evidence from china. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 559–578.

  40. Lobeck, M. (2023). Motivating beliefs in a just world. Available at SSRN 4369242.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Madland, K. R., & Strømland, E. (2022). Fairness of the crowd-an experimental study of social spillovers in fairness decisions.

  42. Mollerstrom, J., Reme, B.-A., & Sørensen, E. Ø. (2015). Luck, choice and responsibility —an experimental study of fairness views. Journal of Public Economics, 131, 33–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Mu, R. (2022). Perceived relative income, fairness, and the role of government: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment in china. China Economic Review, 73, 101784.

  44. Müller, D., & Renes, S. (2021). Fairness views and political preferences: evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample. Social Choice and Welfare, 56(4), 679–711.

  45. Mulligan, T. (2022). How east meets west: Justice and consequences in confucian meritocracy.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Nisbett, R. (2004). The geography of thought: How asians and westerners think differently... and why. Simon and Schuster.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Preuss, M., Reyes, G., Somerville, J., & Wu, J. (2022). Inequality of opportunity and income redistribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00534.

  48. Schulz, J., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J., & Henrich, J. (2018). The origins of weird psychology. Available at SSRN 3201031.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Smyth, R., Mishra, V., & Qian, X. (2010). Knowing one’s lot in life versus climbing the social ladder: The formation of redistributive preferences in urban china. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 275–293.

  50. Stantcheva, S. (2020). Understanding economic policies: What do people know and learn? Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University, 2309–2369.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Telle, I. O., & Tjøtta, S. (2023). Context and preferences for equality in the spectator game. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., & Västfjäll, D. (2017). Are individuals luck egalitarians?– an experiment on the influence of brute and option luck on social preferences. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 460.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Wang, X., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Shi, Y., & Rozelle, S. (2013). College is a rich, han, urban, male club: research notes from a census survey of four tier one colleges in china. The China Quarterly, 214, 456–470.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Whyte, M. K. (2010). Fair versus unfair: How do chinese citizens view current inequalities. Growing pains: Tensions and opportunity in China’s transformation, 305–332.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Xun, Z. (2015). Preference for redistribution and inequality perception in china: Evidence from the cgss 2006.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Non-Meritocrats or Choice-Reluctant Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2024). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:vcuzp_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Non-Meritocrats or Choice-Reluctant Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2024). Mo, Zhexun ; Belguise, Margot ; Huang, Yuchen.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:vcuzp.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Non-meritocrats or choice-reluctant meritocrats? A redistribution experiment in China and France. (2024). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notnic:2024-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2023). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
    In: The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS).
    RePEc:wrk:warwec:1476.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Context and preferences for equality in the spectator game. (2023). Telle, Ingrid Ovidia ; Tjtta, Sigve.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:9:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-023-00140-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2023). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-04423661.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2023). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
    In: CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb).
    RePEc:cpm:docweb:2308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Empirical Research on Ethical Preferences: How Popular is Prioritarianism?. (2022). Schokkaert, Erik ; Tarroux, Benot.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04779424.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Fairness views and political preferences: evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample. (2021). Renes, Sander ; Müller, Daniel ; Muller, Daniel.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:56:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s00355-020-01289-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. How economic success shapes redistribution: The role of self-serving beliefs, in-group bias and justice principles. (2021). Vergnaud, Jean-Christophe ; de Gardelle, Vincent ; Hainguerlot, Marine ; Huber-Yahi, Hlne ; Dorin, Camille.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:932-949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. (2021). Tarroux, Benoît ; Schokkaert, Erik.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03110312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. (2021). Tarroux, Benoît ; Schokkaert, Erik.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:2104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The effect of an experimental veil of ignorance on intergenerational resource sharing: empirical evidence from a sequential multi-person dictator game. (2020). Wolf, Stephan ; Dron, Cameron.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:175:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919305087.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Fairness Views and Political Preferences - Evidence from a representative sample. (2019). Renes, Sander ; Müller, Daniel ; Daniel, Mueller.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2019-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties. (2018). Bosch-Rosa, Ciril.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0205240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. From ideals to deals—The effect of impartiality experience on stakeholder behavior. (2017). Miettinen, Topi ; Halko, Marja-Liisa.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0182263.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Fairness views and political preferences - Evidence from a large online experiment. (2017). Renes, Sander ; Müller, Daniel ; Muller, Daniel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2017-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Luck, Choice and Responsibility: An Experimental Study of Fairness Views. (2015). Sørensen, Erik ; Wang, Siyu ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gms:wpaper:1053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Luck, choice and responsibility — An experimental study of fairness views. (2015). Sørensen, Erik ; Mollerstrom, Johanna ; Sorensen, Erik O ; Reme, Bjorn-Atle.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:131:y:2015:i:c:p:33-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Luck, Choice and Responsibility. An experimental study of fairness views.. (2014). Sørensen, Erik ; Mollerstrom, Johanna ; Sorensen, Erik O. ; Reme, Bjorn-Atle.
    In: Discussion Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2014_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Luck, Choice and Responsibility: An Experimental Study of Fairness Views. (2014). Sørensen, Erik ; Mollerstrom, Johanna ; Sorensen, Eric o. ; Reme, Bjorn-Atle.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-22 01:29:02 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.