Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Leber Herr, J. and Imbens G.W. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. The Stata Journal, 4(3), 290-3 11.
Abadie, A., Imbens, G.W. (2005). On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. ~
Abadie, A., Imbens, G.W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74 (1), 23 5-267.
Aerts, K., Czarnitzki, D. (2005). Using innovation survey data to evaluate R&D policy: the case of Flanders. ZEW Discussion Paper, n. 04-55.
Almus, S., Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Economic Statistics, 21(1), 226-236.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press.
- Asmussen, R., Berriot, C. (1993). Le credit d-impot recherche, cout et effet incitatif. Ministere de lEconomie et des Finances, Paris.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Becker, S., Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation for average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 35 8-377.
- Berger, P. (1993). Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Blanes, J.V. , Busom, I. (2004). Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 33, 1459-1476.
Bloom, N., Griffith, R., Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D credits work? Evidence from an international panel of countries 1979-1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1-3 1.
Busom, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of innovation and New Technologies, 9, 111-148.
- Corchuelo, M.B. (2006). Incentivos fiscales en I+D y decisiones de innovación. Revista de Economia Aplicada, XIV (40), 5-34.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Corchuelo, M.B., Martinez-Ros, E. (2008). Aplicación de los incentivos fiscales a la inversion en I+D en las empresas espaflolas, Hacienda Püblica Espaflola/Revista de EconomIa Aplicada, 187-(4/2008), 9-39.
Czarnitzki, D., Fier A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowded out private investment: evidence from the German service sector. Applied Economics Quarterly, 48(1), 1-25.
Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., Rosa, J.M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credit on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. ZEW Discussion Paper N. 0477.
David, P.A., Hall, B.H., Toole A.A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497-529.
- Dehejia, R., Wahba, 5. (1999). Casual effects in nonexperimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programmes. Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dehejia, R., Wahba, 5. (2002). Propensity Score-Matching methods for nonexperimental casual studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151-161.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Department of Finance Canada and Revenue Canada (1998). Evaluation report: The Federal system of income tax incentives for scientific research and experimental development. Ottawa.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Donald, C. (2004). R&D tax incentives: a comparison of the incentive effects of refundable and non-refundable tax credit. Summer Research Paper. University of Waterloo.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Duch, N., Montolia, D., Mediavilla, M. (2007). Evaluation of public subsidies oriented to firms performance: a quasi-experimental approach. Instituto DEconomia de Barcelona, Working Paper 2007/3.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Duguet, E. (2004). Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Review dEconomie Politique, 114 (2), 263-292.
- Ebersberger, B., Lehtoranta (2005). Pattern of innovative activities among Finnish firms. VTT Publications, 558.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission (2003). Raising EU R&D Intensity. Improving the Effectiveness of Public Support Mechanism for Private Sector Research and Development: Fiscal Measures. EUR 20714, DG for Research Knowledge Based Society and Economy Strategy and Policy, Investment in Research, Luxemburgo.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Falk, M. (2004). European Productivity, Innovation and Public Sector R&D: Evidence from OECD country and industry-level data, background report for the European Competitiveness Report 2004.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fariflas, J.C., Jaumandreu, J. (1999). Diez afios de Encuesta sobre Estrategias Empresariales (ESEE). Economia Industrial, 329, 29-42.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fier, A. (2002), Technology policy and business innovation activities in the case of Germany. In Gretzmacher, N., G. Hutschenreiter y W. Polt (eds.), Proceedings of the tip workshop: Changing Strategies for Business R&D and their implications for Science and Technology (pp.54-67).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gonzalez, X., Pazó, C. (2005). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?. Documentos de Traballo 0601, Universidad of Vigo.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Guellec, D., Van Pottlesberghe, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12(3), 225-244.
- Gupta, S.,, Hwang, Y., Schmidt, A. (2004). R&D spending fools? An analysis of the R&D credits incentive effects after the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989. Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hall, B. (1993). R&D tax policy during the 1980s: success or failure. Tax Policy and the Economy, 7, 1-35.
Hall, B.H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35-5 1.
Hall, B.H., Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29, 449-469.
Hanel, P. (2003). Impact of Government support programs on innovation by Canadian manufacturing firms. Note de Recherche 2003-09, CIRST: Centre Interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST).
Harhoff, D. (1998). Are the financing constraints for R&D investment in German manufacturing firms?. Annales DEconomie et de Statistique, 49/50, 42 1-456.
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training program. Review of Economic Studies, 64 (5), 605664.
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66 (5), 1017-1098.
- Heckman, J., LaLonde, R., Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labour market programme. In Ashenfelter, 0. and Card, D. (eds.), The Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. III.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Herrera, L. (2004). Efecto de la politica de estimulo a la innovación sobre la actividad innovadora de las empresas. Universidad de Leon.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hotz, V.J., Imbens, G.W., Klerman, J.A. (2006). Evaluating the differential effects of alternative welfare-to-work training components: a re-analysis of the Californian GAIN program. NBER Working Paper n. 11939.
hu~,://fniwww.bc.edu/RePec/usug2OO I /psrnatch.pdf Van Pottlesberghe, B., Megally, E., Nysten, 5. (2003). Evaluation of current fiscal incentives for business R&D in Belgium. Working Paper CEB 011. Solvay Business School, Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Kaiser, U. (2004). Private R&D and public subsidies: microeconomic evidence from Denmark.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Klassen, K.J., Pittman, J.A., Reed, M.P. (2003). A cross-national comparison of R&D decisions: tax incentives and financial constraints. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2 1(3), 639-684.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lööf, H., Hesmati, A. (2005). Additionality or crowding out? On the effectiveness of R&D subsidies. The Royal Institute of Technology. Centre of Excellence for Studies in Science and Innovation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lattimore, R. (1997). Research and Development Fiscal Incentives in Australia: Impacts and Policy Lessons. Industry Commission.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lechner, M. (2002). Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Serie A (Statistics in Society), 165, 59.
Mansfield, E. (1986). The R&D tax credit and other technology policy issues. American Economic Review, 76 (2), 190-194.
- Marra, M.A. (2004). Incentivos fiscales, inversiOn en actividades de I+D y estructura de costes. Un analisis por tamafio para una muestra representativa de empresas manufactureras espafiolas 199 1-1999. Hacienda Püblica Espafiola/ Revista de Economia Püblica, 170(3/2004), 9-35.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mc Fetridge, D.G., Warda, J.P. (1983). Canadian R&D Tax Incentives: Their Adequacy and Impact. Canadian Tax Paper, 70. Toronto: Canadian Tax foundation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nelson, R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 297-306.
Parisi, M.L., Sembenelli, A. (2003), Is private R&D spending sensitive to its price? Empirical evidence on panel data for Italy. Empirica, 4.
Sianesi, B. (2001). Implementing propensity score matching estimators with Stata.
- Warda, J. (2001). Measuring the value of R&D tax treatment in OECD countries. In SIT Review, 27, 185-211.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Warda, J. (2002). A 2001-2002 update of R&D tax treatment in OECD countries. Paper prepared for the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now