This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abbasi Shavazi, M.J. and Esmaeili, N. (2021). Media, culturalization and fertility: Identifying and ranking factors affecting fertility using analytical hierarchy process approach [in Persian]. Strategic Studies of Culture 1(1): 7–46. doi:10.22083/scsj.2021.136357.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Abbasi Shavazi, M.J. and Esmaeili, N. (2022). Simulation of women’s fertility behavior in Tehran Province using agent-based modeling approach [in Persian]. Population Association of Iran 17(23): 77–111. doi:doi:10.22034/jpai.2023.559267.1241.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. and Alimandegarie, M. (2010). The effects of various dimensions of women’s autonomy on fertility behavior in Iran [in Persian]. Woman in Development and Politics 8(1): 31–51.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. and Khani, S. (2017). Economic insecurity and marriage and fertility ideals: A study among mothers and their unmarried children in Sanandaj District [in Persian]. Iranian Population Studies 1(2): 37–76.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J., McDonald, P., and Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009). The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/97 8-90-481-3198-3.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J., Razeghi-Nasrabad, H.B., and Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2020). Socio-economic security and fertility intention in Tehran City [in Persian]. Journal of Population Association of Iran 15(29): 211–238.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Adsera, A. (2006). An economic analysis of the gap between desired and actual fertility: The case of Spain, Review Economics of the Household 4(1): 75–95. doi:10.1007/ s11150-005-6698-y.

8. Alvarez, R. (2011). Women’s autonomy and fertility: A comparison of sociocultural indicators. Riverside: University of California, Riverside. https://escholarship. org/uc/item/55w6x0hv.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Aparicio Diaz, B., Fent, T., Prskawetz, A., and Bernardi, L. (2011), Transition to parenthood: The role of social interaction and endogenous networks. Demography 48(2): 559–579. doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0023-6.

10. Balaji, P.G. and Srinivasan, D. (2010). Innovations in multi-agent systems and application. Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14435-6_1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Baroni, E., Eklof, M., Hallberg, D., Lindh, T., and Zamac, J. (2009). Fertility decisions: Simulation in an agent-based model (IFSIM). In: Zaidi, A., Harding, A., and Williamson, P. (eds.). New frontiers in microsimulation modelling. Ashgate: 265– 286. doi:10.4324/9781315248066-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Baudin, T. (2015). Religion and fertility: The French connection. Demographic Research 32(13): 397–420. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.13.

13. Becker, G.S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: Becker, G.S. (ed.). Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 209–231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Bernardi, L. (2003). Channels of social influence on reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review 22: 527–555. doi:10.1023/B:POPU.0000020892.15221.44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Berndt, J.O., Rodermund, S.C., and Timm, I. (2018). Social contagion of fertility: An agent based simulation study. In: Rabe, M., Juan, A.A., Mustafee, N., Skoogh, A., Jain, S., and Johansson, B. (eds.). Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference. Picataway: IEEE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Bijak, J., Higham, P.A., Hilton, J., Hinsch, M., Nurse, S., Prike, T., Smith, P.W.F., Uhrmacher, A.M., and Warnke, T. (2021). Towards Bayesian model-based demography: Agency, complexity and uncertainty in migration studies. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83039-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Billari, F.C. (2015). Integrating macro- and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change. Population Studies 69(1): 10–30. doi:10.1080/00324728. 2015.1009712.

18. Billari, F.C., Fent, T., Prskawetz, A., and Scheffran, J. (2006). Agent–based computational modelling applications in demography, social, economic and environment sciences. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. doi:10.1007/3-7908-1721-X.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Bjorklund, A. (2006). Does family policy affect fertility? Lessons from Sweden. Journal of Population Economics 19(1): 3–24. doi:10.1007/s00148-005-0024-0.

20. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2016). Inflation rate of 2016. https://www.cbi.ir/Inflation/Inflation_FA.aspx.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Demographic Research: Volume 51, Article 5 https://www.demographic-research.org 145 Billari, F.C., Prskawetz, A., Aparicio Diaz, B, and Fent, T. (2007). The wedding-ring: An agent-based marriage model based on social interaction. Demographic Research 17(3): 59–82. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.3. Bisin, A. and Verdier, T. (2001). The Economics of cultural transmission and the dynamic of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 97(2): 298–319. doi:10.1006/jeth.2000.2678.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Demographic Research: Volume 51, Article 5 https://www.demographic-research.org 147 McNicoll, G. (2001). Fertility: Institutional and political approaches. In: Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B. (eds.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral science. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02145-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Doepke, M., Hannusch, A., Kindermann, F., and Tertilt, M. (2023). The economics of fertility: A new era. Handbook of the Economics of the Family 1(1): 151–254. doi:10.1016/bs.hefam.2023.01.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Esmaeili & Abbasi-Shavazi: Impact of family policies and economic situation on low fertility in Tehran, Iran 146 https://www.demographic-research.org Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D.L., Polhill, J.G., Giske, J., and Railsback, S.F. (2010). The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecological Modelling 221(23): 2760–2768. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Fathi, E. (2021). A look at the past, present and future of Iran’s population. Statistics Research Institute. Available at https://srtc.ac.ir/en/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Fent, T., Aparicio Diaz, B., and Prskawetz, A. (2013). Family policies in the context of low fertility and social structure. Demographic Research 29(37): 963–998.

27. Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., Pinnelli, A., and Prati, S. (2013). Economic insecurity and the fertility intentions of Italian women with one child. Population Research and Policy Review 32(3): 373–413. doi:10.1007/s11113-013-9266-9.

28. Forty, J., Navaneetham, K., and Letamo, G. (2021). Determinants of fertility in Malawi: Does women autonomy dimension matter? Journal of Population Research 38(2): 245–264. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01926-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Garcia, S., Luengo, J., and Herrera, F. (2015). Data preprocessing in data mining. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10247-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323–346. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x.

31. Gonzalez-Bailon, S. and Murphy, E.T. (2013). The effects of social interactions on fertility decline in nineteenth-century France: An agent-based simulation experiment. Population Studies 67(2): 135–155. doi:10.1080/00324728.2013. 774435.

32. Grow, A. and Van Bavel, J. (2016). Agent-based modelling in population studies: Concepts, methods, and applications. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-31932283 -4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Grow, A. and Van Bavel, J. (2016). Introduction: Agent-based modelling as a tool to advance evolutionary population theory. In: Van Bavel, J. and Grow, A. (eds.). Agent-based modelling in population studies: Concepts, methods, and applications (the Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis). Cham: Springer: 3–28. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32283-4_1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Heyford, S.R and Morgan, S.P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Sociology Forces 86(3): 1163–1188. doi:10.1353/ sof.0.0000.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Hubert, S. (2014). The impact of religiosity on fertility: A comparative analysis of France, Norway, and Germany. Wiesbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-07008-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Hwang, J. (2023). Later, fewer, none? Recent trends in cohort fertility in South Korea.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Lee, R. (1990). The demographic response to economic crisis in historical and contemporary populations. Population Bulletin of the United Nations 29(29): 1– 15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Leridon, H. (2015). The development of fertility theories: A multidisciplinary endeavour.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Lutz, W., Cuaresma, J.C., and Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. (2010). Demography, education, and democracy: Global trends and the case of Iran. Population and Development Review 36(2): 253–281. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00329.x. McDonald, P., Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., and Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. (2015). Assessment of Iranian fertility trends using parity progression ratios. Demographic Research 32(58): 1581−1602. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.58.

40. McNicoll, G. (1980). Institutional determinants of fertility change. Population and Development Review 6(3): 441–462. doi:10.2307/1972410.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review 30(1): 25–56. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00002.x. Moeeni, M., Pourreza, A., Torabi, F., Heydari, H., and Mahmoudi, M. (2014). Analysis of economic determinants of fertility in Iran: A multilevel approach. International Journal of Health Policy Management 3(3): 135–144. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014. 78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Muller, B., Bohn, F.J., Dressler, G., Groeneveld, J., Klassert, C.J., Martin, R., Schluter, M., Schulze, J., Weise, H., and Schwarz, N. (2013). Describing human decisions in agent-based models: ODD + D, an extension of the ODD protocol. Environmental Modelling and Software 48: 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.en vsoft.2013.06.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. National Organization for Civil Registeration (2019). Yearbook of population statistics 2020. Tehran:Organization Publications Registration of Iran. https://amar.org.ir/ english/Iran-Statistical-Yearbook/Iran-Statistical-Yearbook-2019-2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Orsal, D.D.k. and Goldstein, J.R. (2010). The importance increasing of economic condition on fertility. (MPIDR Working paper WP 2010-014). Rostock: MPIDR.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Rao, A.S. and Georgeff, M.P. (1995). BDI agents: From theory to practice. In: Lesser, V. and Gasser, L. (eds.). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems. Mebourne: Aaai Pr.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Rindfuss, R.R. and Choe, M.K. (2015). Low fertility, institutions, and their policies: Variations across industrialized countries. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3319 -32997-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Salehi-Isfahani, D.J. (2023). The impact of sanctions on household welfare and employment in Iran. Middle East Development Journal 15(2): 189–221. doi:10.1080/17938120.2023.2248697.

48. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., and Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review 37(2): 267–306. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x. Statistical Centre of Iran (2017). Population distribution by age groups in Tehran province. Available at https://amar.org.ir/statistical-information/statid/47920.

49. Statistical Center of Iran (2019). The trend of fertility rate in Iran. (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019). Available at https://www.amar.org.ir.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Statistical Centre of Iran (2019). Inflation rate. (2017, 2018, 2019). Available at https://www.amar.org.ir.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. The 2017 Fertility Transition Survey in five selected provinces of Iran. (Unpublished report). Tehran: National Institute of Population Research and National Institute of Health Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. The Anylogic Company (2021). Anylogic help. [Online]. Avaliable from http://www.anylogic.com.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Vignoli, D., Bazzani, G., Guetto, R., Minello, A., and Pirani, E. (2020). Uncertainty and narratives of the future: A theoretical framework for contemporary fertility. In: Schoen, R. (ed.). Analyzing contemporary fertility. (The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 51). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48519-1_3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Vignoli, D., Minello, A., Bazzani, G., Matera, C., and Rapallini, C. (2021). Economic uncertainty and fertility intentions: The causal effect of narratives of the future. (DISIA Working Paper).

55. Western, B., Bloom, D., Sosnaud, B., and Tach, L. (2012). Economic insecurity and social stratification. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 341–359. doi:10.1146/ annurev-soc-071811-145434.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Fertility policy, fertility intentions, and fertility transition: A quasi-natural experiment based on the Universal Two-Child Policy. (2025). Chen, Xiaodong ; Lei, Haidong ; Ma, Jie ; Ding, Ziyue.
   In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
   RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:336-352.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Fertility as a variable for tackling the demographic challenge, is having children in Spain an unfulfilled desire?. (2024). Sanchez Fuentes, Antonio Jesus ; Bazah, Najat.
   In: Working Papers REM.
   RePEc:ise:remwps:wp03172024.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Impact of family policies and economic situation on low fertility in Tehran, Iran: A multi-agent-based modeling. (2024). Esmaeili, Nasibeh ; Abbasi, Mohammad Jalal.
   In: Demographic Research.
   RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Pathways and obstacles to parenthood among women in same-sex couples in Spain. (2024). Boertien, Diederik ; Lozano, Mariona ; Cortina, Clara.
   In: Demographic Research.
   RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:35.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Fertility Intentions Within a 3-Year Time Frame: a Comparison Between Migrant and Native Italian Women. (2023). Strozza, Salvatore ; Ortensi, Livia Elisa ; Gabrielli, Giuseppe ; Mussino, Eleonora.
   In: Journal of International Migration and Integration.
   RePEc:spr:joimai:v:24:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12134-020-00800-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The effects of Covid-19 on couples’ job tenures: Mothers have it worse. (2023). Visschers, Ludo ; Santaeulalia-Llopis, Raul ; Lafuente, Cristina ; la Fuente, Cristina ; Ruland, Astrid.
   In: Labour Economics.
   RePEc:eee:labeco:v:83:y:2023:i:c:s0927537123000799.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Sprawl or Segregation? Local Fertility as a Proxy of Socio-spatial Disparities Under Sequential Economic Downturns. (2022). Salvati, Luca ; Polinesi, Gloria ; Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo.
   In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
   RePEc:spr:soinre:v:164:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-022-02992-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Hyperbolic discounting in an intergenerational model with altruistic parents. (2022). Li, Minghao ; Cao, Jia.
   In: Journal of Population Economics.
   RePEc:spr:jopoec:v:35:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s00148-021-00824-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Husband, sons and the fertility gap: evidence from India. (2021). Parasnis, Jaai ; Mishra, Ankita.
   In: Journal of Population Research.
   RePEc:spr:joprea:v:38:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12546-021-09254-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The gap between desired and expected fertility among women in Iran: A case study of Tehran city. (2021). Saikia, Udoy ; Hosseini, Maryam ; Dasvarma, Gouranga.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0257128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Recession, Local Fertility, and Urban Sustainability: Results of a Quasi-Experiment in Greece, 1991–2018. (2021). Salvia, Rosanna ; Halbac-Cotoara, Rares ; Salvati, Luca ; Egidi, Gianluca ; Gimenez-Morera, Antonio ; Sateriano, Adele.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1052-:d:483800.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Econometric Models of Fertility. (2020). Trivedi, Pravin ; Miranda, Alfonso.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:574.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Econometric Models of Fertility. (2020). Trivedi, Pravin ; Miranda, Alfonso.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Analysis of Fertility in Turkey: The Importance of Future Fertility PreferencesAbstract: Fertility analyzes are generally not carried out considering future fertility preferences. However, future fertility preferences should be considered in terms of both family planning and the updating of fertility policies currently in practice. In this study, fertility analysis was conducted using data from 2008 and 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Two models have been created that take into account the future fertility preferences of households and these models have been estimated with the Generalized Poisson Regression Model. It was found that the standard models that do not take into account the future fertility preferences of the households and the findings obtained from the model taking into consideration differ. In the model that takes into account the future fertility preferences of households, it is seen that the coefficient signs of age, marriage age, employment status and husband age variables change. For this reason, policy-makers should be cautious when making a policy towards fertility, because findings from standard analyzes can lead to false policy practices.. (2019). Gemcolu, Seluk ; Ahn, Hasan ; Er, Emrah.
    In: Sosyoekonomi Journal.
    RePEc:sos:sosjrn:190311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Husband, sons and fertility gap: Evidence from India. (2019). Parasnis, Jaai ; Mishra, Ankita.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2018-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Employment Uncertainty and Fertility: A Network Meta-Analysis of European Research Findings. (2019). Vignoli, Daniele ; Matysiak, Anna ; Alderotti, Giammarco ; Baccini, Michela.
    In: Econometrics Working Papers Archive.
    RePEc:fir:econom:wp2019_06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Housework, Gender Role Attitudes, and Couples Fertility Intentions: Reconsidering Mens Roles in Gender Theories of Family Change. (2019). Razyurovich, Liat ; Okun, Barbara S.
    In: Population and Development Review.
    RePEc:bla:popdev:v:45:y:2019:i:1:p:169-196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. DETERMINANTS OF FEMALE FERTILITY IN ASEAN-5: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM BOUNDS COINTEGRATION TEST. (2018). Loganathan, Nanthakumar ; DEVADASON, EVELYN ; Subramaniam, Thirunaukarasu.
    In: The Singapore Economic Review (SER).
    RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:63:y:2018:i:03:n:s0217590815500939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Education and fertility in the context of rising inequality. (2017). Adsera, Alicia.
    In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research.
    RePEc:vid:yearbk:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:063-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Too early or too late: What have we learned from the 30-year two-child policy experiment in Yicheng, China?. (2017). Qin, Yu ; Wang, Fei.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:37:y:2017:i:30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Unrealized fertility: Fertility desires at the end of the reproductive career. (2017). Han, Siqi ; Casterline, John.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:36:y:2017:i:14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Life insurance and demographic change: An empirical analysis of surrender decisions based on panel data. (2016). Gotz, Martin ; Gemmo, Irina.
    In: SAFE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:safewp:240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Life insurance and demographic change: An empirical analysis of surrender decisions based on panel data. (2016). Goetz, Martin ; Gotz, Martin ; Gemmo, Irina.
    In: ICIR Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:icirwp:2416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Does current demographic policy in Russia impact on fertility of different educational groups?. (2014). Tyndik, Alla ; Kalabichina, Irina E.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:121850.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Does current demographic policy in Russia impact on fertility of different educational groups?. (2014). Tyndik, Alla ; Kalabikhina, Irina.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:upa:wpaper:0010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Two Is Best? The Persistence of a Two-Child Family Ideal in Europe. (2014). Sobotka, Toma ; Beaujouan, Eva.
    In: Population and Development Review.
    RePEc:bla:popdev:v:40:y:2014:i:3:p:391-419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. What are the factors of the gap between desired and actual fertility? - A comparative study of four developed countries. (2012). Nishimura, Tomo.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:kgu:wpaper:81.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. I would if I could: precarious employment and childbearing intentions in Italy. (2012). Sabatini, Fabio ; Modena, Francesca.
    In: Review of Economics of the Household.
    RePEc:kap:reveho:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:77-97.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. REFEREED ARTICLES - Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. (2011). Miller, Warren B..
    In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research.
    RePEc:vid:yearbk:v:9:y:2011:i:1:p:75-98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Where Are the Babies? Labor Market Conditions and Fertility in Europe. (2011). Adsera, Alicia.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:27:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s10680-010-9222-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Fertility and Consumption when Having a Child is a Risky Investment. (2011). Gete, Pedro ; Porchia, Paolo .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:geo:guwopa:gueconwpa~11-11-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The interplay of employment uncertainty and education in explaining second births in Europe. (2011). Adsera, Alicia.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:25:y:2011:i:16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Job instability and family planning: insights from the Italian puzzle. (2010). Sabatini, Fabio.
    In: Department of Economics University of Siena.
    RePEc:usi:wpaper:584.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The Cost of Low Fertility in Europe. (2010). Fink, Günther ; canning, david ; Finlay, Jocelyn E ; Bloom, David E.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:26:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s10680-009-9182-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. I Would if I Could: Precarious Employment and Childbearing Intentions in Italy. (2010). Sabatini, Fabio ; Modena, Francesca.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:26117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Work status and family planning: Insights from the Italian puzzle. (2009). .
    In: wp.comunite.
    RePEc:ter:wpaper:0058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Work status and family planning: insights from the Italian puzzle. (2009). Sabatini, Fabio.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:18851.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. The Cost of Low Fertility in Europe. (2009). Finlay, Jocelyn ; Fink, Günther ; canning, david ; Bloom, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:14820.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. The High Cost of Low Fertility in Europe. (2008). Fink, Günther ; canning, david ; Bloom, David ; Finlay, Jocelyn E..
    In: PGDA Working Papers.
    RePEc:gdm:wpaper:3208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-21 14:43:54 || Missing content? Let us know