create a website

The changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics and fertility trends in Europe and the United States: A review. (2025). Kuang, Bernice ; Berrington, Ann ; Kulu, Hill ; Vasireddy, Sindhu.
In: Demographic Research.
RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 200

References cited by this document

Cocites: 22

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Modeling Demographic Growth in Russia: Factors, Mechanisms, Reserves. (2025). Ekimova, Natalia A.
    In: Journal of Applied Economic Research.
    RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:386-414.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. (eds.). Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences. Cham: Springer: 57–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Aassve, A. (2003). The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young American women. Demography 40(1): 105– 126. doi:10.1353/dem.2003.0001.

  3. Advances in Life Course Research 17(2): 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2012.03.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Anderson, K.G. (2011). Does paying child support reduce men’s subsequent marriage and fertility? Evolution and Human Behavior 32(2): 90–96. doi:10.1016/j. evolhumbehav.2010.08.008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Andersson, G. (1997). The impact of children on divorce risks of Swedish women.

  6. Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L.B., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., Teschner, K., and Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research 20(14): 313–352. doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2009.20.14.

  7. Andersson, L. (2021). Partnerships and fertility: Trends and conjectures. Paper presented at ‘What happened to Nordic fertility,’ 3 February 2021, University of Turku, Finland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Andersson, L. (2023). A novel macro perspective on family dynamics: The contribution of partnership contexts of births to cohort fertility rates. Population and Development Review 49(3): 617–649. doi:10.1111/padr.12579.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Andersson, L. (2023). The role of gender differences in partnering and re-partnering for gender differences in completed fertility. Population Research and Policy Review 42(2): 17. doi:10.1007/s11113-023-09767-1.

  10. Andersson, L., Jalovaara, M., Uggla, C., and Saarela, J. (2022). Less is more? Repartnering and completed cohort fertility in Finland. Demography 59(6): 2321– 2339. doi:10.1215/00703370-10351787.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Andreasson, J., Tarrant, A., Johansson, T., and Ladlow, L. (2023). Perceptions of gender equality and engaged fatherhood among young fathers: parenthood and the welfare state in Sweden and the UK. Families, Relationships and Societies 12(3): 323–340. doi:10.1332/204674321X16520100466479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Andreev, E.M., Churilova, E., and Jasilioniene, A. (2022). Partnership context of first births in Russia: The enduring significance of marriage. European Journal of Population 38(1): 37–58. doi:10.1007/s10680-021-09600-5.

  13. Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F.C. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population and Environment 25(6): 531–561. doi:10.1023/B:POEN.0000039064.65655.3b.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Balbo, N., Billari, F., and Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population 29: 1–38. doi:10.1007/s10680-0129277 -y.

  15. Baranowska-Rataj, A. (2014). What would your parents say? The impact of cohabitation among young people on their relationships with their parents. Journal of Happiness Studies 15(6): 1313–1332. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9477-0.

  16. Baranowska-Rataj, A., Mynarska, M., and Vignoli, D. (2014). A dirty look from the neighbors. Does living in a religious neighborhood prevent cohabitation? (Working Papers 71). Warsaw: Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Beaujouan, É. (2010). Séparations, nouvelles unions: Quelles influences sur la fécondité? Population et Sociétés 464(2): 1–4. doi:10.3917/popsoc.464.0001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Beaujouan, É. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Beaujouan, E. (2020). Latest-late fertility? Decline and resurgence of late parenthood across the low-fertility countries. Population and Development Review 46(2): 219–247. doi:10.1111/padr.12334.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Beaujouan, E. and Solaz, A. (2012). Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 29. doi:10.1007/ s10680-012-9271-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Beaujouan, E., Zeman, K., and Nathan, M. (2023). Delayed first births and completed fertility across the 1940–1969 birth cohorts. Demographic Research 48(15): 387– 420. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2023.48.15.

  22. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on marriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Berg, V., Miettinen, A., Jokela, M., and Rotkirch, A. (2020). Shorter birth intervals between siblings are associated with increased risk of parental divorce. PloS One 15(1): e0228237–e0228237. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228237.

  25. Berghammer, C. (2012). Family life trajectories and religiosity in Austria. European Sociological Review 28(1): 127–144. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq052.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., and Hart, R.K. (2021). Can policies stall the fertility fall? A systematic review of the (quasi-) experimental literature. Population and Development Review 47(4): 913–964. doi:10.1111/padr.12431.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Berrington, A. (2001). Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnerships in Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 80–96. doi:10.1111/j.17413737. 2001.00080.x. Berrington, A. (2017). Childlessness in the UK. In Kreyenfeld, M. and Konietzka, D.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Berrington, A. (2020). Expectations for family transitions in young adulthood among the UK second generation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(5): 913–935.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Berrington, A. and Diamond, I. (1999). Marital dissolution among the 1958 British birth cohort: The role of cohabitation. Population Studies 53(1): 19–38. doi:10.1080/ 00324720308066.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Berrington, A. and Stone, J. (2017). Understanding third and fourth births in Britain: What role do increased immigration and multiple partnerships play? (Centre for Population Change Working Paper Series). Southampton: University of Southampton.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Berrington, A., Perelli-Harris, B., and Trevena, P. (2015). Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK. Demographic Research 33(12): 327–362. doi:10.4054/ DemRes.2015.33.12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Billari, F. and Kohler, H.-P. (2004). Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Billingsley, S. (2010). The post-Communist fertility puzzle. Population Research and Policy Review 29(2): 193–231. doi:10.1007/s11113-009-9136-7.

  34. Boissonneault, M. and de Beer, J. (2022). Microsimulation of household and marital transitions leading to childlessness among Dutch women born between 1971 and 2000. Demography 59(1): 137–160. doi:10.1215/00703370-9624050.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Bolano, D. and Vignoli, D. (2021). Union formation under conditions of uncertainty: The objective and subjective sides of employment uncertainty. Demographic Research 45(5): 141–186. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.5. Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility.

  36. Bongaarts, J. (2015). Modeling the fertility impact of the proximate determinants: Time for a tune-up. Demographic Research 33(19): 535–560. doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2015.33.19.

  37. Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., and Chzhen, Y. (2018). Cash benefits and poverty in singleparent families. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. and Maldonado, L.C. (eds.). The triple bind of single-parent families: Resources, employment and policies to improve wellbeing. Bristol University Press: 337–358. doi:10.2307/j.ctt2204rvq.21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Brown, S.L., Manning, W.D., and Stykes, J.B. (2015). Family structure and child wellbeing: Integrating family complexity. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(1): 177–190. doi:10.1111/jomf.12145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Buber-Ennser, I. and Prskawetz, A. (2000). Fertility in second unions in Austria: Findings from the Austrian FFS. Demographic Research 3(2). doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2000.3.2. Carioli, A. and Sironi, E. (2020). Does union formation change attitudes towards childbearing in Bulgaria? A propensity score analysis. Advances in Life Course Research 46(100356). doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100356.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Castro, R. (2015). Late-entry-into-motherhood women are responsible for fertility recuperation. Journal of Biosocial Science 47(2): 275–279. doi:10.1017/S002193 2014000121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Cavanagh, S.E. and Fomby, P. (2019). Family instability in the lives of American children. Annual Review of Sociology 45(1): 493–513. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc073018 -022633.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Churilova, E., Zakharov, S., Puur, A., Rahnu, L., and Sakkeus, L. (2017). Childbearing after repartnering among Russians, Russians migrants and Estonians: Prevalence and determinants. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3092208.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Clarke, S., Diamond, I., Spicer, K., and Chappell, R. (1993). The relationship between marital breakdown and childbearing in England and Wales. Studies on Medical and Population Subjects (55): 123–136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Coleman, D.A. and Dubuc, S. (2010). The fertility of ethnic minorities in the UK, 1960s– 2006. Population Studies 64(1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/00324720903391201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Compans, M.-C., Beaujouan, E., and Dutreuilh, C. (2022). From union formation to first birth: The role of age at first cohabitation in the transition to motherhood and fatherhood. Population 77(3): 411–436. doi:10.3917/popu.2203.0439.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Comparative Population Studies 46. doi:10.12765/CPoS-2021-01. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 226 https://www.demographic-research.org
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Coppola, L. and Di Cesare, M. (2008). How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain. Demographic Research 18(4): 117–144. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.4. De Valk, H.A.G. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). Parental influence on union formation preferences among Turkish, Moroccan, and Dutch adolescents in the Netherlands.

  48. Delaporte, I. and Kulu, H. (2023). Interaction between childbearing and partnership trajectories among immigrants and their descendants in France: An application of multichannel sequence analysis. Population Studies 77(1): 55–70. doi:10.1080/ 00324728.2022.2049856.

  49. Demographic Research 16(9): 249–286. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.9. Musick, K. and Michelmore, K. (2015). Change in the stability of marital and cohabiting unions following the birth of a child. Demography 52(5): 1463–1485. doi:10.1007/s13524-015-0425-y.

  50. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 222 https://www.demographic-research.org Sobotka, T. (2002). Ten years of rapid fertility changes in the European post-communist countries. (University of Groningen, Population Research Centre, Research Reports). Groningen: PRC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Demographic Research S3(3): 45–86. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3. Sweeney, M.M. and Raley, R.K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 539–558. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043342.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 207 Bellido, H. and Marcén, M. (2014). Divorce laws and fertility. Labour Economics 27: 56–70. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.01.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 209 Cherlin, A. (2008). Multiple partnerships and children’s wellbeing. Family Matters 80: 33–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 211 Gibson-Davis, C. (2011). Mothers but not wives: The increasing lag between nonmarital births and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 73(1): 264–278. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00803.x. Gibson-Davis, C.M. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00586.x. Gibson-Davis, C.M., Ananat, E.O., and Gassman-Pines, A. (2016). Midpregnancy marriage and divorce: Why the death of shotgun marriage has been greatly exaggerated. Demography 53(6): 1693–1715. doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0510-x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 213 Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., and Boertien, D. (2017). Family dynamics and child outcomes: An overview of research and open questions. European Journal of Population 33(2): 163–184. doi:10.1007/s10680-017-9424-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 215 Kalmijn, M. and Gelissen, J. (2007). The impact of recohabitation on fertility: Evidence from life history data in the Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 38(4): 555–574. doi:10.3138/jcfs.38.4.555.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 217 Lillard, L.A. and Waite, L.J. (1993). A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption. Demography 30(4): 653–681. doi:10.2307/2061812.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 221 Saarela, J. and Skirbekk, V. (2020). Childlessness and union histories: Evidence from Finnish population register data. Journal of Biosocial Science 52(1): 78–96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 223 Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Di Nallo, A. (2019). Gender gap in repartnering: The role of parental status and custodial arrangements. Journal of Marriage and Family 81(1): 59–78. doi:10.1111/jomf. 12527.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Di Nallo, A., Ivanova, K., and Balbo, N. (2023). Repartnering of women in the United States: The interplay between motherhood and socio-economic status. Population Studies 77(3): 399–416. doi:10.1080/00324728.2022.2152478.

  62. Diverse paths into childlessness over the life course. Advances in Life Course Research 25: 35–48. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2015.05.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.8. Spéder, Z. and Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 25(4): 503–523. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9189-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.1. Walke, R. (2002). Twins or two single children: The influence of the multiplicity of the first birth on the divorce risk of Swedish women. Demographic Research 7(9): 379–389. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.9. Demographic Research: Volume 52, Article 7 https://www.demographic-research.org 225 Westoff, C.F. (1986). Fertility in the United States. Science 234(4776): 554–559. doi:10.1126/science.3532324.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Ermisch, J. and Pevalin, D.J. (2005). Early motherhood and later partnerships. Journal of Population Economics 18(3): 469–489. doi:10.1007/s00148-004-0216-z.

  66. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Esping-Andersen, G. and Billari, F.C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics.

  68. Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., and Graham, E. (2017). Choosing to remain childless? A comparative study of fertility intentions among women and men in Italy and Britain. European Journal of Population 33(3): 319–350. doi:10.1007/s10680-016-9404-2.

  69. Fostik, A., Fernández Soto, M., Ruiz-Vallejo, F., and Ciganda, D. (2023). Union Instability and Fertility: An International Perspective. European Journal of Population 39(1): 25. doi:10.1007/s10680-023-09668-1.

  70. Frejka, T. (2012). The role of contemporary childbearing postponement and recuperation in shaping period fertility trends. Comparative Population Studies 36(4).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Gałęzewska, P., Perelli-Harris, B., and Berrington, A. (2017). Cross-national differences in women’s repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics. Demographic Research 37(8): 189–228. doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2017.37.8. Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323–346. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Gibson-Davis, C. and Rackin, H. (2014). Marriage or carriage? Trends in union context and birth type by education. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 506–519. doi:10.1111/jomf.12109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and intimacy in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Giguère, B., Lalonde, R., and Lou, E. (2010). Living at the crossroads of cultural worlds: The experience of normative conflicts by second generation immigrant youth.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Goldberg, J.S. and Carlson, M.J. (2014). Parents’ relationship quality and children’s behavior in stable married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(4): 762–777. doi:10.1111/jomf.12120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior.

  76. Groepler, N., Huinink, J., and Peter, T. (2021). Does the birth of a child still prompt a marriage? A comparison of Austria, France, Germany and Hungary. European Societies 23(3): 333–359. doi:10.1080/14616696.2021.1922930.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Guzman, L., Wildsmith, E., Manlove, J., and Franzetta, K. (2010). Unintended births: Patterns by race and ethnicity and relationship type. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 42(3): 176–185. doi:10.1363/4217610.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Guzzo, K.B. (2014). New partners, more kids: Multiple-partner fertility in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 66–86. doi:10.1177/0002716214525571.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Guzzo, K.B. (2018). Marriage and dissolution among women’s cohabitations: Variations by stepfamily status and shared childbearing. Journal of Family Issues 39(4): 1108–1136. doi:10.1177/0192513X16686136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Guzzo, K.B. and Hayford, S.R. (2020). Pathways to parenthood in social and family contexts: Decade in review, 2020. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 117– 144. doi:10.1111/jomf.12618.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review 8(3): 449–494. doi:10.2307/1972376.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. Hannemann, T. and Kulu, H. (2015). Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom. Demographic Research 33(10): 273–312. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.10.

  83. Hannemann, T., Kulu, H., González-Ferrer, A., Pailhé, A., Rahnu, L., and Puur, A. (2020). Partnership dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in four European countries. Population, Space and Place 26(5): e2315. doi:10.1002/ psp.2315.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Hărăgus, M. (2015). From cohabitation to marriage when a child is on the way: A comparison of three former socialist countries: Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungary. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 46(3): 329–350. doi:10.3138/jcfs.46. 3.329.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Harknett, K. and McLanahan, S.S. (2004). Racial and ethnic differences in marriage after the birth of a child. American Sociological Review 69(6): 790–811. doi:10.1177/ 000312240406900603.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  86. Harrison, J., Kulu, H., Keenan, K.L., and Sullivan, F. (2023). Union formation and fertility amongst immigrants from Pakistan and their descendants in the United Kingdom: A multichannel sequence analysis. Demographic Research 48(10): 271–320. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2023.48.10.

  87. Hart, R.K. (2019). Union histories of dissolution: What can they say about childlessness? European Journal of Population 35(1): 101–131. doi:10.1007/s10680-018-94646.

  88. Hayford, S.R. (2013). Marriage (still) matters: The contribution of demographic change to trends in childlessness in the United States. Demography 50(5): 1641–1661. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0215-3.

  89. Heaton, T.B., Jacobson, C.K., and Holland, K. (1999). Persistence and change in decisions to remain childless. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(2): 531–539. doi:10.2307/353767.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J., and Myrskylä, M. (2022). Less partnering, less children, or both? Analysis of the drivers of first birth decline in Finland since 2010. European Journal of Population 38(2): 191–221. doi:10.1007/s10680-022-09605-8.

  91. Herbst-Debby, A. (2022). (De)legitimization of single mothers’ welfare rights: United States, Britain and Israel. Journal of European Social Policy 32(3): 302–316. doi:10.1177/09589287221076743.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Hiekel, N. and Castro-Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 489–505. doi:10.1111/jomf.12112.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Hiekel, N. and Wagner, M. (2020). Individualized relationship practices and union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation. European Sociological Review 36(6): 868–885. doi:10.1093/esr/jcaa021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Holland, J. and Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–99. Population Studies 65(1): 115–128. doi:10.1080/00324 728.2010.543693.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context / L’impact des enfants sur les chances d’une nouvelle union pour les hommes et pour les femmes dans Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 214 https://www.demographic-research.org un contexte européen. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 29(4): 417–444. doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9294-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2014). Fertility after repartnering in the Netherlands: Parenthood or commitment? Advances in Life Course Research 21: 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2013.08.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  97. Jalovaara, M. and Fasang, A.E. (2017). From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness. Demographic Research 36(55): 1703–1720.

  98. Jalovaara, M. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2020). Childbearing across partnerships in Finland and Germany. In: Mortelmans, D. (ed.). Divorce in Europe: New insights in trends, causes and consequences of relation break-ups. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 315–335. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25838-2_15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Jalovaara, M. and Kulu, H. (2018). Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch? European Sociological Review 34(5): 486–500. doi:10.1093/esr/jcy017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Jalovaara, M., Andersson, L., and Miettinen, A. (2021). Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners. Population Studies 76(1): 119–136. doi:10.31235/osf.io/sjdt6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Jansen, M., Wijckmans, B., and Van Bavel, J. (2009). Divorce and the cumulated fertility of men and women across Europe. (Interface demography working paper 1). Brussels: VUB Interface Demography.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  102. Jefferies, J., Berrington, A., and Diamond, I. (2000). Childbearing following marital dissolution in Britain. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 16(3): 193–210. doi:10.1023/A:1026529300659.

  103. Jejeebhoy, S.J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy and reproductive behaviour: Experiences from developing countries. Oxford: Clardendon Press. doi:10.1093/ oso/9780198290339.001.0001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Jena, A.B., Goldman, D.P., and Joyce, G. (2011). Association between the birth of twins and parental divorce. Obstetrics and Gynecology 117(4): 892–897. doi:10.1097/ AOG.0b013e3182102adf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Jónsson, A.K. (2021). A nation of bastards? Registered cohabitation, childbearing, and first-marriage formation in Iceland, 1994–2013. European Journal of Population 37(1): 65–95. doi:10.1007/s10680-020-09560-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Kalmijn, M. and Leopold, T. (2020). A new look at the separation surge in Europe: Contrasting adult and child perspectives. American Sociological Review 86(1): 1– 34. doi:10.1177/0003122420973982.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  107. Keizer, R., Dykstra, P.A., and Jansen, M.D. (2008). Pathways into childlessness: Evidence of gendered life course dynamics. Journal of Biosocial Science 40(6): 863–878. doi:10.1017/S0021932007002660.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55. doi:10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00162.x. Klärner, A. (2015). The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany – social norms and the role of peoples’ perceptions of the past. Demographic Research S17(9): 239–272. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.9. Klüsener, S. (2015). Spatial variation in non-marital fertility across Europe in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: Recent trends, persistence of the past, and potential future pathways. The History of the Family 20(4): 593–628. doi:10.1080/ 1081602X.2015.1099112.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Knab, J., Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S., Moiduddin, E., and Osborne, C. (2009). The effects of welfare and child support policies on the incidence of marriage following a nonmarital birth. In: Ziliak, J.P. (ed.). Welfare reform and its longterm consequences for America’s poor. Cambridge Cambridge University Press: 290–307. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511605383.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Kravdal, Ø. and Rindfuss, R.R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review 73(5): 854–873. doi:10.1177/000312240807300508.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  111. Kreyenfeld, M., Geisler, E., Castro Martín, T., Hannemann, T., Heintz-Martin, V., Jalovaara, M., Kulu, H., Meggiolaro, S., Mortelmans, P.D., Pasteels, I., Seiz, M., and Solaz, A. (2017). Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe. Demographic Research S21(37): 1245–1274. doi:10.4054/Dem Res.2017.37.37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  112. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 206 https://www.demographic-research.org Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F.C. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 19(2): 147–169.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 208 https://www.demographic-research.org Blossfeld, H.P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168. doi:10.1086/229743.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  114. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 210 https://www.demographic-research.org Eggebeen, D. and Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family 71(1): 108–121. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00583.x. England, P., Wu, L.L., and Shafer, E.F. (2013). Cohort trends in premarital first births: What role for the retreat from marriage? Demography 50(6): 2075–2104. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0241-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 212 https://www.demographic-research.org Grogger, J. and Bronars, S.G. (2001). The effect of welfare payments on the marriage and fertility behavior of unwed mothers: Results from a twins experiment. Journal of Political Economy 109(3): 529–545. doi:10.1086/321016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  116. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 216 https://www.demographic-research.org Kulu, H. and Hannemann, T. (2016). Why does fertility remain high among certain UKborn ethnic minority women? Demographic Research 35(49): 1441–1488.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  117. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 218 https://www.demographic-research.org Mikolai, J. and Kulu, H. (2023). Partnership and fertility trajectories of immigrants and descendants in the United Kingdom: A multilevel multistate event history approach. Population Studies 77(3): 359–378. doi:10.1080/00324728.2022.214 4639.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 220 https://www.demographic-research.org Pirani, E. and Vignoli, D. (2023). Childbearing across partnerships in Italy: Prevalence, demographic correlates, and social gradient. Population Studies 77(3): 379–398. doi:10.1080/00324728.2022.2149845.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  119. Kulu, H. (2014). Marriage duration and divorce: The seven-year itch or a lifelong itch? Demography 51(3): 881–893. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0278-1.

  120. Kulu, H., Hannemann, T., Pailhé, A., Neels, K., Krapf, S., González-Ferrer, A., and Andersson, G. (2017). Fertility by birth order among the descendants of immigrants in selected European countries. Population and Development Review 43(1): 31–60. doi:10.1111/padr.12037.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  121. Kulu, H., Milewski, N., Hannemann, T., and Mikolai, J. (2019). A decade of life-course research on fertility of immigrants and their descendants in Europe. Demographic Research 40(46): 1345–1374. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.46.

  122. Lappegård, T., Klüsener, S., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Social norms, economic conditions and spatial variation of childbearing within cohabitation across Europe. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR working paper WP2014 -002). doi:10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2014-002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  123. Le Goff, J.-M. (2002). Cohabiting unions in France and West Germany: Transitions to first birth and first marriage. Demographic Research 7(18): 593–624.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  124. Lehrer, E.L. (2004). Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 30(4): 707–726. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00038.x. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.0032 8.x. Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D.J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In: Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D.J. (eds.). Bevolking: Groei en Krimp (Population: Growth and decline). Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus: 9–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  125. Lewis, J. and Kiernan, K. (1996). The boundaries between marriage, nonmarriage, and parenthood: Changes in behavior and policy in postwar Britain. Journal of Family History 21(3): 372–387. doi:10.1177/036319909602100306.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  126. Liefbroer, A.C. and Rijken, A.J. (2019). The association between Christianity and marriage attitudes in Europe: Does religious context matter? European Sociological Review 35(3): 363–379. doi:10.1093/esr/jcz014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  127. Lillard, L.A. and Panis, C.W.A. (1996). Marital status and mortality: The role of health.

  128. Liu, G. (2002). How premarital children and childbearing in current marriage influence divorce of Swedish women in their first marriages. Demographic Research 7(10): 389–406. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.10.

  129. Lutz, W. and KC, S. (2011). Global human capital: Integrating education and population.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  130. Lyngstad, T. and Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution.

  131. Manlove, J., Wildsmith, E., Ikramullah, E., Ryan, S., Holcombe, E., Scott, M., and Peterson, K. (2012). Union transitions following the birth of a child to cohabiting parents. Population Research and Policy Review 31(3): 361–386. doi:10.1007/ s11113-012-9231-z.

  132. Manning, W.D. (2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: Racial and ethnic differences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  133. Manning, W.D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(3): 674–689. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00046.x. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4): 607–627. doi:10.1353/dem.2004. 0033.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  134. Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2010). The implications of marital instability for a woman’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy. Demographic Research 23(34): 963–996. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.34.

  135. Mikolai, J. (2017). Partnership histories and the transition to motherhood in later reproductive ages in Europe. Population 72(1): 123–154. doi:10.3917/popu. 1701.0127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  136. Mikolai, J., Berrington, A., and Perelli-Harris, B. (2018). The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 39(27): 753–794. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2018. 39.27.

  137. Milewski, N. (2007). First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation? Demographic Research 17(29): 859–896. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  138. Murphy, M. (1993). The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors in fertility change in Britain 1963–1980: A challenge to the conventional view.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  139. Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing, and the marriage process.

  140. Musick, K. and Michelmore, K. (2018). Cross-national comparisons of union stability in cohabiting and married families with children. Demography 55(4): 1389–1421. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0683-6.

  141. Neyer, G. (2013). Welfare states, family policies, and fertility in Europe. In: Neyer, G., Andersson, G., Kulu, H., Bernardi, L., and Bühler, C. (eds.). The demography of Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8978-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  142. Nishikido, M., Cui, Q., and Esteve, A. (2022). Partnership dynamics and the fertility gap between Sweden and Spain. Genus 78(1): 26. doi:10.1186/s41118-022-00170-w.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  143. Nitsche, N. and Hayford, S.R. (2020). Preferences, partners, and parenthood: Linking early fertility desires, marriage timing, and achieved fertility. Demography 57(6): 1975–2001. doi:10.1007/s13524-020-00927-y.

  144. Pagnini, D.L. and Rindfuss, R.R. (1993). The divorce of marriage and childbearing: Changing attitudes and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 19(2): 331–347. doi:10.2307/2938442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  145. Parker, E., Sassler, S., and Tach, L. (2020). Fatherhood and racial/ethnic differences in the progression of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 83(4): 985–1003. doi:10.1111/jomf.12733.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  146. Pelikh, A., Mikolai, J., and Kulu, H. (2022). Make up or break up? Partnership transitions among young adults in England and Wales. Advances in Life Course Research 52: 100475. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100475.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  147. Pelikh, A., Remes, H., Metsä-Simola, N., and Goisis, A. (2023). Partnership trajectories preceding medically assisted reproduction. Population Studies: 78(2): 341–360. doi:10.1080/00324728.2023.2215213.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  148. Perelli-Harris, B. (2014). How similar are cohabiting and married parents? Second conception risks by union type in the United States and across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 437–464. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9320-2.

  149. Perelli-Harris, B. and Gassen, N.S. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  150. Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00357.x. Peri-Rotem, N. (2016). Religion and fertility in Western Europe: Trends across cohorts in Britain, France and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population 32(2): 231–265. doi:10.1007/s10680-015-9371-z.

  151. Philipov, D. and Berghammer, C. (2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 5: 271–305. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2007s271.

  152. Pollak, R.A. and Watkins, S.C. (1993). Cultural and Economic Approaches to Fertility: Proper Marriage or Mesalliance? Population and Development Review 19(3): 467–496. doi:10.2307/2938463.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  153. Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015. 00024.x. Evans, R., Scourfield, J., and Moore, G. (2014). Gender, relationship breakdown, and suicide risk: A review of research in western countries. Journal of Family Issues 37(16): 2239–2264. doi:10.1177/0192513X14562608.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  154. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457. 2015.00045.x. Golombok, S. (2015). Modern families: Parents and children in new family forms.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  155. Raab, M. and Struffolino, E. (2020). The Heterogeneity of Partnership Trajectories to Childlessness in Germany. European Journal of Population 36(1): 53–70. doi:10.1007/s10680-019-09519-y.

  156. Rahnu, L. and Jalovaara, M. (2023). Partnership dynamics and entry into parenthood: Comparison of Finnish birth cohorts 1969–2000. Advances in Life Course Research 56: 100548. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100548.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  157. Rahnu, L., Puur, A., Sakkeus, L., and Klesment, M. (2015). Partnership dynamics among migrants and their descendants in Estonia. Demographic Research 32(56): 1519– 1566. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.56.

  158. Raley, R.K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: evidence for the second demographic transition in the united states? Demography 38(1): 59–66. doi:10.1353/dem.2001.0008.

  159. Raley, R.K. and Sweeney, M.M. (2020). Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 81–99. doi:10.1111/ jomf.12651.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  160. Raybould, A. and Sear, R. (2021). Children of the (gender) revolution: A theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labour influences fertility.

  161. Reher, D.S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–234. doi:10.2307/2807972.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  162. Remes, H., Palma Carvajal, M., Peltonen, R., Martikainen, P., and Goisis, A. (2022). The well-being of adolescents conceived through medically assisted reproduction: A population-level and within-family analysis. European Journal of Population 38(5): 915–949. doi:10.1007/s10680-022-09623-6.

  163. Rutigliano, R. and Esping-Andersen, G. (2018). Partnership choice and childbearing in Norway and Spain. European Journal of Population 34(3): 367–386. doi:10.1007/ s10680-017-9432-6.

  164. Sánchez Gassen, N. and Perelli-Harris, B. (2015). The increase in cohabitation and the role of union status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  165. Sassler, S. and Lichter, D.T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 35– 61. doi:10.1111/jomf.12617.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  166. Schnor, C., Pasteels, I., and Van Bavel, J. (2017). Sole physical custody and mother’s repartnering after divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family 79(3): 879–890. doi:10.1111/jomf.12389.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  167. Smock, P.J., Manning, W.D., and Porter, M. (2005). ‘Everything’s there except money’: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680–696. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x. Sobotka, T. (2011). Fertility in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989: Collapse and gradual recovery. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 36(2): 246–296. doi:10.12759/hsr.36.2011.2.246-296.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  168. Sobotka, T. (2015). Low fertility in Austria and the Czech Republic: Gradual policy adjustments. (Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers 2). Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  169. Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  170. Sobotka, T., Št’astná, A., Zeman, K., Hamplová, D., and Kantorová, V. (2008). Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism. Demographic Research 19(14): 403–454. doi:10.4054/ DemRes.2008.19.14.

  171. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(1): 14–29. doi:10.1111/j.17519004. 2009.00228.x. Ginther, D.K., Grasdal, A.L., and Pollak R.A. (2022). Fathers’ multiple-partner fertility and children’s educational outcomes. Demography 59(1): 389–415. doi:10.1215/ 00703370-9701508.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  172. Spéder, Z. (2006). Rudiments of recent fertility decline in Hungary: Postponement, educational differences, and outcomes of changing partnership forms. Demographic Research, 15(8) 253–288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  173. Steele, F., Joshi, H., Kallis, C., and Goldstein, H. (2006). Changing compatibility of cohabitation and childbearing between young British women born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies 60(2): 137–152. doi:10.1080/00324720600598009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  174. Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., and Joshi, H. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain.

  175. Stone, L. (2023). Ultra-Orthodox fertility and marriage in the United States: Evidence from the American Community Survey. Demographic Research 49(29): 769–782.

  176. Sturm, N., Koops, J.C., and Rutigliano, R. (2023). The influence of partnership status on fertility intentions of childless women and men across European countries.

  177. Surkyn, J. and Lestaeghe, R. (2004). Values orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  178. Thomson, E. (2004). Step-families and childbearing desires in Europe. Demographic Research S3(5): 117–134. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.5. Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 245–258. doi:10.1177/0002 716214531384.

  179. Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., Spielauer, M., and Prskawetz, A. (2012). Union instability as an engine of fertility? A microsimulation model for France.

  180. Thornton, A. and Philipov, D. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population 25(2): 123–156. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9181-2.

  181. Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., and Hill, D.H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 628–651. doi:10.1086/230051.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  182. Tocchioni, V., Rybińska, A., Mynarska, M., Matysiak, A., and Vignoli, D. (2022). Lifecourse trajectories of childless women: Country-specific or universal? European Journal of Population 38(5): 1315–1332. doi:10.1007/s10680-022-09624-5.

  183. Todesco, L. (2011). A matter of number, age or marriage? Children and marital dissolution in Italy. Population Research and Policy Review 30(2): 313–332. doi:10.1007/s11113-010-9190-1.

  184. Upchurch, D.M., Lillard, L.A., and Panis, C.W.A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography 39(2): 311–329. doi:10.1353/dem.2002.0020.

  185. Van Bavel, J. and Reher, D.S. (2013). The baby boom and its causes: What we know and what we need to know. Population and Development Review 39(2): 257–288. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00591.x. Van Landschoot, L., de Valk, H.A.G., and Van Bavel, J. (2017). Fertility among descendants of immigrants in Belgium: The role of the partner. Demographic Research 36(60): 1827–1858. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.60.

  186. Van Bavel, J., Jansen, M., and Wijckmans, B. (2012). Has divorce become a pro-natal force in Europe at the turn of the 21st century? Population Research and Policy Review 31(5): 751–775. doi:10.1007/s11113-012-9237-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  187. Vanassche, S., Corijn, M., Matthijs, K., and Swicegood, G. (2015). Repartnering and childbearing after divorce: Differences according to parental status and custodial Kuang et al.: Changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics & fertility trends in Europe & the US 224 https://www.demographic-research.org arrangements. Population Research and Policy Review 34(5): 761–784. doi:10.1007/s11113-015-9366-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  188. Vasireddy, S., Berrington, A., Kuang, B., and Kulu, H. (2023). Education and fertility: A review of recent research in Europe. Comparative Population Studies 48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  189. Vergauwen, J., Neels, K., and Wood, J. (2017). Educational differentials in cohabitors’ marriage intentions at different childbearing stages in seven European countries.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  190. Vermeulen, W., Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., Kooiman, N., and Liefbroer, A. (2023). Religion and union dissolution: Effects of couple and municipal religiosity on divorce and separation. Demographic Research 49(20): 513–542.

  191. Vignoli, D. and Salvini, S. (2014). Religion and union formation in Italy: Catholic precepts, social pressure, and tradition. Demographic Research 31(35): 1079– 1106. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.35.

  192. Vignoli, D., Tocchioni, V., and Mattei, A. (2020). The impact of job uncertainty on firstbirth postponement. Advances in Life Course Research 45: 100308. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2019.100308.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  193. Vignoli, D., Tocchioni, V., and Salvini, S. (2016). Uncertain lives Insights into the role of job precariousness in union formation in Italy. Demographic Research 35(10): 253–282. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.10.

  194. Vikat, A., Thomson, E., and Hoem, J.M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies 53(2): 211–225. doi:10.1080/00324720308082.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  195. Vitali, A., Aassve, A., and Lappegård, T. (2015). Diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation. Demography 52(2): 355–377. doi:10.1007/s13524-015-0380-7.

  196. Wagner, M., Huinink, J., and Liefbroer, A.C. (2019). Running out of time? Understanding the consequences of the biological clock for the dynamics of fertility intentions and union formation. Demographic Research 40(1): 1–26.

  197. Winkler-Dworak, M., Beaujouan, E., Di Giulio, P., and Spielauer, M. (2017). Union instability and fertility: A microsimulation model for Italy and Great Britain. (Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers). Vienna: VID.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  198. Wu, L. and Martin, S. (2002). Is there an engine of nonmarital fertility? (CDE Working Paper 2002-14). Madison, WI: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  199. Zagel, H., Hübgen, S., and Nieuwenhuis, R. (2021). Diverging trends in single-mother poverty across Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom: Toward a comprehensive explanatory framework. Social Forces 101(2): 606–638. doi:10.1093/sf/soab142.

  200. Zimmermann, O. (2021). Is early partnership formation instrumental for fertility in Germany? Influences of fertility orientations on partnership transitions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics and fertility trends in Europe and the United States: A review. (2025). Kuang, Bernice ; Berrington, Ann ; Kulu, Hill ; Vasireddy, Sindhu.
    In: Demographic Research.
    RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Family Socioeconomic Status and Chinese College Students’ Premarital Sexual Attitudes and Behavior. (2023). Wu, Xiaogang ; Chen, Tao ; Li, Dongyu ; Hu, Anning.
    In: Population Research and Policy Review.
    RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:42:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-023-09775-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Socio-Economic Differences in the Prevalence of Single Motherhood in North America and Europe. (2021). Koops, Judith C ; Gauthier, Anne H ; Liefbroer, Aart C.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:37:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10680-021-09591-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Influence of Parental Educational Attainment on the Partnership Context at First Birth in 16 Western Societies. (2017). Koops, Judith C ; Gauthier, Anne H ; Liefbroer, Aart C.
    In: European Journal of Population.
    RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:33:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10680-017-9421-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Teenage pregnancies and births in Germany: Patterns and developments. (2014). Riphahn, Regina ; Cygan-Rehm, Kamila.
    In: FAU Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:iwqwdp:052014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Testing the Economic Independence Hypothesis: The Effect of an Exogenous Increase in Child Support on Subsequent Marriage and Cohabitation. (2014). Cancian, Maria ; Meyer, Daniel.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:51:y:2014:i:3:p:857-880.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Teenage Pregnancies and Births in Germany: Patterns and Developments. (2014). Riphahn, Regina ; Cygan-Rehm, Kamila.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Teenage Pregnancies and Birth in Germany: Patterns and Developments. (2014). Riphahn, Regina ; Cygan-Rehm, Kamila ; Riphan, Regina T..
    In: SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Teenage Pregnancies and Births in Germany: Patterns and Developments. (2014). Riphahn, Regina ; Cygan-Rehm, Kamila.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4836.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Examining the Antecedents of U.S. Nonmarital Fatherhood. (2013). Pilkauskas, Natasha ; Carlson, Marcia ; Vanorman, Alicia.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:50:y:2013:i:4:p:1421-1447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Teen Mothers and Culture. (2013). MARCÉN, MIRIAM ; Bellido, Héctor.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:44712.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The Evolution of Family Complexity from the Perspective of Nonmarital Children. (2011). Cancian, Maria ; Cook, Steven ; Meyer, Daniel.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:48:y:2011:i:3:p:957-982.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Economic Trajectories in Non-Traditional Families with Children. (2009). McLanahan, Sara ; Meadows, Sarah ; Knab, Jean.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pri:crcwel:wp09-10-ff.pdf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Economic Trajectories in Non-Traditional Families with Children. (2009). McLanahan, Sara ; Meadows, Sarah ; Knab, Jean.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pri:crcwel:wp09-10-ff.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Should We Get Married? The Effect of Parents Marriage on Out-of-Wedlock Children. (2008). Heiland, Frank ; Liu, Shirley H.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pri:crcwel:wp07-02-ff.pdf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Should We Get Married? The Effect of Parents’ Marriage on Out-of-Wedlock Children. (2007). Heiland, Frank.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pri:crcwel:wp07-02-ff.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Should We Get Married? The Effect of Parents’ Marriage on Out-of-Wedlock Children. (2007). Liu, Shirley ; Heiland, Frank.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:mia:wpaper:0611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The White Picket Fence Dream: Effects of Assets on the Choice of Family Union.. (2006). Mamun, Arif.
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:5009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The White Picket Fence Dream: Effects of Assets on the Choice of Family Union. (2006). Mamun, Arif A..
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:01ccaca54ad44dc89c4f3f3931172fb9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Union formation in fragile families. (2004). McLanahan, Sara ; England, Paula ; Carlson, Marcia.
    In: Demography.
    RePEc:spr:demogr:v:41:y:2004:i:2:p:237-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Employment, family union, and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. (2004). Propper, Carol ; Dickson, Matt ; Burgess, Simon ; Aassve, Arnstein.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:6306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Employment, Family Union, and Childbearing Decisions in Great Britain. (2004). Propper, Carol ; Dickson, Matt ; Burgess, Simon ; Aassve, Arnstein.
    In: CASE Papers.
    RePEc:cep:sticas:084.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 01:59:03 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.