This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abelson P (1996), âValuing Water Quality in Wuxi, China,â in Project Appraisal and Valuation of the Environment- General Principles and 6 Case Studies in Developing Countries, Macmillan Press Limited, Great Britain; pp. 89-118.

2. Alvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N., BarberÃn, R., LÃzaro, A. (2007), âChoice Modeling at the âMarket Stallâ: Individual Versus Collective interest in Environmental Valuationâ, Ecological Economics, 60(4), pp. 743-751.

3. Barton D N (2002), The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica Ecological Economics, Vol. 42(1-2), pp.147-164.

4. Barton, D.N., Taron, A. and B. Alvares (2008),âUsing choice experiments to value irrigation waterâ, http://kvina.niva.no/striver/Portals/0/documents/STRIVER_TB4.p df Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N.,Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E.,Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R., Swanson, S. (2003), Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Bennett, J.W. and E. Birol (Eds.). (2010), Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications, Edward-Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.

6. Bienabe, E., Hearne, R.R (2006), âPublic preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services paymentsâ, Forest Policy and Economic, Vol. 9, pp. 335-348.

7. Birol, E., N. Hanley, P. Koundouri and Y. Kountouris (2009b), âThe optimal management of wetlands: Quantifying trade-offs between flood risks, recreation and biodiversity conservationâ.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Birol, E., P. Koundouri and Y. Kountouris (2008), âEvaluating Farmersâ Preferences for Wastewater: Quantity and Quality Aspectsâ, International Journal of Water, 4(1), pp.69-86.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Birol, E., P. Koundouri and Y. Kountouris (2009a) âAssessing the economic viability of alternative water resources in water scarce regions: The roles of economic valuation, costâbenefit analysis and discountingâ, Ecological Economics, 69, 839-847.

10. Boxall, P.C., and W.L. Adamowicz (2002), âUnderstanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approachâ, Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, pp. 421â446.

11. Bureau of Applied Economics & Statistics, Govt. of West Bengal (2003), http://www.indiastat.com/india/state.asp?stid=26&secid=131&ptid=24&l evel=4 Bush, G. Colombo, S., Hanley, N. (2009), âShould all Choices Count? Using the Cut-Offs Approach to Edit Responses in a Choice Experimentâ, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(3), pp. 397-414.

12. Campbell, H. W. (2000), âSludge management-future issues and trendsâ Water, Science and Technology, Proceedings Sludge Management for the 21st Century, IWA, Vol. 41(8), pp. 1-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Census of India (2001), http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/Basic_Data_Sheet.aspx Choe, K.A., D. Whittington, and D. T. Lauria (1996), âThe Economic Benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: a case study of Davao, Philippinesâ, Land Economics 72(4), pp. 519-537.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Colombo, S., N. Hanley, J. Calatrava-Requena (2005), âDesigning Policy for Reducing the Off-farm Effects of Soil Erosion Using Choice Experimentsâ, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56 (1), pp. 81-95.

15. Cooper P., G.L.Poe, I.J. Bateman (2004), âThe structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvementâ, Ecological Economics, Vol. 50(1â2), pp.69â82.

16. De Groote, H and S Kimenju (2008), âComparing consumer preferences for color and nutritional quality in maize: Application of a semidouble -bound logistic model on urban consumers in Kenyaâ, Food Policy Vol. 33 (4), August, pp.362-370.

17. Desvouges W.H., Smith V.K., Fisher A (1987), âOption Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvements: A Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela Riverâ, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 14(3), pp. 248-267.

18. Fernandez, L. (1997), âEstimation of Wastewater Treatment Objectives through Maximum Entropy, âJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 32(3), pp. 293-308 Fischhendler, I. (2007), Escaping the polluter trap: financing wastewater treatment on the Tijuana-San Diego borderâ, Ecological Economics, Vol. 63(2-3), pp. 485-498.

19. Fraas A.G and Munley V.G (1984), âMunicipal Wastewater Treatment Cost, Journal of Environmental Economics and Managementâ, Vol. 11, pp. 28-38.

20. Green C H and Tunstall S M (1991), âThe evaluation of river water quality improvements by the contingent valuation methodâ, Applied Economics, Vol. 23(7), pp. 1135 â 1146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Greene, W.H. (1997), Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Ha S R and Bae M S (2001), âEffects of Land Use and Municipal Wastewater Treatment Changes on Stream Water Qualityâ, Environmental Monitoring and Assessmentâ, Vol. 70(1-2), pp. 135-151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Hanemann, W.M. (1984): âWelfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responsesâ, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 71 (4), pp. 1057â1061.

24. Hanley, N., Colombo, S., Tinch, D., Black, A., Aftab, A. (2006b), âEstimating the benefits of water quality improvements under the Water Framework Directive: are benefits transferable?â, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 33 (3), pp. 391413.

25. Hanley, N., Wright and Adamowicz, W(1998), âUsing Choice Experiments to Value the Environmentâ, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3-4), pp. 413-428.

26. Hanley, N., Wright, R.E., Alvarez-Farizo, B(2006a), âEstimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: a application to the water framework directiveâ, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 78, pp. 183-193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Hasler, B., Lundhede, T., Martinsen, L., Neye, S., Schoi, J.S (2005), âValuation of groundwater protection versus water treatment in Denmark by Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuationâ, NERI Technical Report No. 543.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Hausman J.A. and McFadden, D. (1984), âSpecification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Modelâ, Econometrica, 52, pp. 1219-1240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Hensher, D., Rose, J., and Greene, W. (2005), Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Hope, R.A(2006), âEvaluation Water Policy Scenarios Against the Priorities of the Rural Poorâ, World Development, Vol. 34(1), pp. 167-179.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Hu, W., Hunnemeyer, A., Veeman, M., Adamowicz, W.L. and Srivastava, L. (2004), âTrading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in foodâ, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31, pp. 389-408.

32. Idelovitch E and Ringskog K (1997), âWastewater treatment in Latin America: Old and New Optionsâ, The World Bank, Washington D.C Kontogianni A., Langford I.H., Papandreou A., Skourtus M.S (2003), âSocial Preferences for Improving Water Quality: An Economic Analysis of Benefits from Wastewater Treatmentâ, Water Resource Management, Vol. 17(5), pp. 317-336.

33. Lancaster, K. (1966), âA new approach to consumer theoryâ, Journal of Political Economics, 74, pp. 217â231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D. Swait, J., and Adamowicz, W (2000), Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

35. Luce, D. (1959), Individual Choice Behaviour, John Wiley, New York, NY.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Maddala, G.S. (1999), Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Markandya A and M.N Murty (2004), âCost-Benefit analysis of cleaning the Ganges: some emerging environment and development issuesâ, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 61-81.

38. McFadden, D. (1974), âConditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviorâ, In: P. Zarembka, Editor, Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Murty, M.N, James A.J and S.Misra (2000), Economics of water Pollution: The Indian Experience, Oxford University Press,New Delhi.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Othman J, Bennett J, Blamey R (2004), âEnvironmental values and resource management options: a choice modelling experience in Malaysiaâ, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 803â824.

41. Poe, G.L., Severance-Lossin, E.K. and Welsh, M.P. (1994), âMeasuring the difference (XâY) of simulated distributions: a convolutions approachâ, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, pp. 904â915.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Revelt, D., Train, K (1998), âMixed logit with repeated choices: households' choice of appliance efficiency levelâ, Review of Economics and Statistics, 53, pp. 647â657.

43. Rolfe J.R. and Windle, J.(2005), âValuing options for reserve water in the Fitzroy Basinâ, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 49(1), pp. 91-114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Scarpa R., E.S.K. Ruto, P. Kristjanson, M. Radeny, A.G. Drucker and J.E.O. Rege (2003b), âValuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: An empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimatesâ. Ecological Economics, Vol. 45(3), pp. 409-426.

45. Scarpa, R., A. Drucker, S. Anderson, N. Ferraes-Ehuan, V. Gomez, C. R. Risopatron and O. Rubio-Leonel (2003a), âValuing Animal Genetic Resources in Peasant Economies: The Case of the Box Keken Creole Pig in Yucatanâ, Ecological Economics, Vol. 45 (3), pp. 427-443.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Showers K.B (2002), âWater Scarcity and Urban Africa- An Overview of Urban-Rural Water linkagesâ, World Development, Vol 30(4), pp. 621-648.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Train, K.E. (1998), âRecreation demand models with taste differences over peopleâ, Land Economics, 74, pp. 230â239. Wang.H (2002), âPollution regulation and abatement efforts: evidence from Chinaâ, Ecological Economics, Vol. 41(1), pp. 85-94.

48. Water Resources Research, 45, W11426. doi:10.1029/2008WR006955 Birol, E., E. Rayn Villalba and M. Smale (2009c), âInvestigating Heterogeneity in Farmer Preferences for Milpa Diversity and Genetically Modified Maize in Mexico: A Latent Class Approachâ, Environment and Development Economics, 14(4), pp.521-540.

49. Willis, K.G., Scarpa, R. Acutt, M. (2005), âAssessing water company customer preferences and willingness to pay for service improvements: A Stated Choice Analysisâ, Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, pp. 1-11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. World Fact Book (2007), Central Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook /geos/in.html#Econ MSE Monographs * Monograph 1/2006 A Tract on Reform of Federal Fiscal Relations in India Raja J. Chelliah * Monograph 2/2006 Employment and Growth C. Rangarajan * Monograph 3/2006 The Importance of Being Earnest about Fiscal Responsibility C. Rangarajan and Duvvuri Subbarao * Monograph 4/2007 The Reserve Bank and The State Governments: Partners in Progress Y.V.Reddy * Monograph 5/2008 Indiaâs Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Policy-Making in a Globalized World Kaushik Basu * Monograph 6/2010 MDGS-based Poverty Reduction Strategy for Tamil Nadu D.K.Srivastava, K.R. Shanmugam and C.Bhujanga Rao * * * * * *
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Potential impacts of sustainable agricultural practices on smallholders behavior in developing countries: Evidence from Togo. (2022). Adji, Koffi M.
   In: Natural Resources Forum.
   RePEc:wly:natres:v:46:y:2022:i:1:p:73-87.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. What theories of value (could) underpin our circular futures?. (2022). Lowe, Benjamin H ; Genovese, Andrea.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:195:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000441.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Public preference for river restoration in the Danda Basin, Nepal: A choice experiment study. (2020). Bohara, Alok ; Kunwar, Samrat B ; Thacher, Jennifer.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:175:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919315228.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. When do social cues and scientific information affect stated preferences? Insights from an experiment on air pollution. (2018). Luchini, Stéphane ; CHANEL, Olivier ; Aprahamian, Frédéric.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:29:y:2018:i:c:p:33-46.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Influence of payment modes on farmers’ contribution to climate change adaptation: understanding differences using a choice experiment in Nepal. (2017). Wilson, Clevo ; Managi, Shunsuke ; Lee, Boon ; Khanal, Uttam.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:107430.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Disentangling the influence of knowledge on attribute non-attendance. (2017). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:24:y:2017:i:c:p:36-50.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Assessing willingness to pay for marine and coastal ecosystems: A Case Study in Greece. (2016). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Galani, Georgia.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:68767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions. (2016). Watson, Verity ; Oabrien, Liz ; Irvine, Katherine N ; Orchard-Webb, Johanne ; Kenter, Jasper O ; Bryce, Rosalind ; Fazey, Ioan ; Tett, Paul ; Raymond, Christopher M ; Cooper, Nigel ; Ravenscroft, Neil ; Hockley, Neal ; Christie, Michael ; Reed, Mark S.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pb:p:358-371.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. (2016). Kenter, Jasper O.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pb:p:291-307.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Valuing unfamiliar and complex environmental goods: A comparison of valuation workshops and internet panel surveys with videos. (2016). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke ; Navrud, Stale ; Aanesen, Margrethe.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:129:y:2016:i:c:p:50-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Disentangling the Influence of Knowledge on Processing Strategies in Choice Modelling.. (2015). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2015-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Measuring Shared Social Appreciation of Community Goods: An Experiment for the East Elevated Expressway of Rome. (2015). Miccoli, Saverio ; Murro, Rocco ; Finucci, Fabrizio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15194-15218:d:59020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Managing tourism in the Galapagos Islands through price incentives: A choice experiment approach. (2015). Brandt, Sylvia ; Mejia, Cesar Viteri .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:117:y:2015:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Cheaper electricity or a better river? Estimating fluvial ecosystem value in Southern France. (2014). Pontoni, Federico ; Creti, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00998614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: Results from a discrete choice experiment. (2014). Hynes, Stephen ; Murphy, Geraldine ; Doherty, Edel ; Buckley, Cathal.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:7:y:2014:i:c:p:89-97.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Sustainable soy biodiesel. (2013). Cavallaro, S. ; Milazzo, M. F. ; Spina, F. ; Bart, J. C. J., .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:27:y:2013:i:c:p:806-852.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Are similar ecosystem services valued differently across different water body types: A discrete choice analysis of rivers, lakes and sea attributes?. (2013). Hynes, Stephen ; Murphy, Geraldine ; Doherty, Edel ; Buckley, Cathal.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:semrui:160055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Attribute Framing in Choice Experiments: How Do Attribute Level Descriptions Affect Value Estimates?. (2012). Kragt, Marit ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:51:y:2012:i:1:p:43-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Weighting social preferences in participatory multi-criteria evaluations: A case study on sustainable natural resource management. (2012). Gamboa, Gonzalo ; Garmendia, Eneko.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:84:y:2012:i:c:p:110-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Accounting for Nonmarket Impacts in a Benefit-Cost Analysis of Underground Coal Mining in New South Wales, Australia. (2012). Kragt, Marit ; Gillespie, Rob .
    In: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.
    RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:3:y:2012:i:2:n:4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Integrating scientific assessment of wetland areas and economic evaluation tools to develop an evaluation framework to advise wetland management. (2011). Robinson, Jackie ; Dent, Jared ; Schaffer, Gabriella .
    In: Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:qld:uq2004:420.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Reducing protest responses by deliberative monetary valuation: Improving the validity of biodiversity valuation. (2011). Szab, Zoltn.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:72:y:2011:i:c:p:37-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Using choice experiments to value catchment and estuary health in Tasmania with individual preference heterogeneity. (2011). Kragt, Marit ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:176878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. The Value of Improved Public Services: An Application of the Choice Experiment Method to Estimate the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure in India. (2010). Das, Sukanya ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:mad:wpaper:2010-051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. (2010). Stagl, Sigrid ; Garmendia, Eneko.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:8:p:1712-1722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Public participation and willingness to cooperate in common-pool resource management: A field experiment with fishing communities in Brazil. (2010). Schläpfer, Felix ; Schlapfer, Felix ; Cavalcanti, Carina ; Schmid, Bernhard.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:3:p:613-622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The Value of Improved Public Services : An Application of the Choice Experiment Method to Estimate the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure in India. (2010). Das, Sukanya ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Development Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:eab:develo:23062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The citizen versus consumer hypothesis: Do welfare estimates differ?. (2009). O'Donoghue, Cathal ; Hynes, Stephen ; Howley, Peter ; Odonoghue, Cathal.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tea:wpaper:0911.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Defining environmental attributes as external costs in choice experiments: A discussion. (2009). Riera Font, Antoni ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M..
    In: CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE).
    RePEc:pdm:wpaper:2009/1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. The influence of decision-making rules on individual preferences for ecological restoration: Evidence from an experimental survey. (2009). Tsuge, Takahiro ; Takeuchi, Kenji ; Kuriyama, Koichi ; Ito, Nobuyuki ; Mitani, Yohei ; Shoji, Yasushi.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:8-9:p:2426-2431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Are We Willing to Pay Enough to `Back the Bid?: Valuing the Intangible Impacts of Londons Bid to Host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games. (2008). Szymanski, Stefan ; Mourato, Susana ; Atkinson, Giles.
    In: Urban Studies.
    RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:419-444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Applications of the Choice Experiment Method in Europe: A Review. (2008). Koundouri, Phoebe ; Birol, Ekin ; Kountoyris, Yiannis .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:41903.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. The influence of decision-making rules on individual preference for ecological restoration: Evidence from an experimental survey. (2008). Tsuge, Takahiro ; Takeuchi, Kenji ; Kuriyama, Koichi ; Ito, Nobuyuki ; Mitani, Yohei ; Shoji, Yasushi.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:koe:wpaper:0820.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Competitive politics, simplified heuristics, and preferences for public goods. (2008). Schläpfer, Felix ; Schmitt, Marcel ; Schlpfer, Felix ; Roschewitz, Anna.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:65:y:2008:i:3:p:574-589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Contingent valuation: A new perspective. (2008). Schläpfer, Felix.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2008:i:4:p:729-740.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Non-market economic valuation in developing countries: Role of participant observation method in CVM analysis. (2007). Chaudhry, Pradeep ; Tewari, Vindhya P. ; Singh, Bilas .
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:13:y:2007:i:4:p:259-275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Willingness to pay for insecticide - impregnated Bed Nets: The case of selected Rural kebeles in llu woreda of western shoea zone. (2006). Belaineh, Taye .
    In: Ethiopian Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:ags:eeaeje:249853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A Preliminary Consideration of Use and Non-Use Values Circumscribing the Lake Hume Water and Foreshore Management Plan. (2006). Crase, Lin ; Gillespie, Rob .
    In: 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare06:174471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. A Preliminary Consideration of Use and Non-Use Values Circumscribing the Lake Hume Water and Foreshore Management Plan. (2005). Gillespie, Rob ; Crase, Lin.
    In: 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare05:139330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Measuring the Benefits of Reticulated Sewerage -- Expectations and Expert Property Valuation. (2002). Gillespie, Robert.
    In: 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare02:125088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Application of Willingness-to-Pay Methods to Value Transport Externalities in Less Developed Countries. (2000). Cifuentes, Luis A ; de Dios, Juan.
    In: Environment and Planning A.
    RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:11:p:2007-2018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. The Effects of Structural Adjustment on Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Lowland Bolivia. (1999). Pacheco, Pablo ; Thiele, Graham ; Kaimowitz, David.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:27:y:1999:i:3:p:505-520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. ECONOMIC VALUATION OF SOME WETLAND OUTPUTS OF MUD LAKE, MINNESOTA-SOUTH DAKOTA. (1997). Roberts, Lisa A. ; Leitch, Jay A..
    In: Agricultural Economics Reports.
    RePEc:ags:nddaer:23406.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. A Review of Economic Appraisal of Environmental Goods and Services: With a Focus on Developing Countries. (1996). Hearne, Bob.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:iieddp:24144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 02:44:45 || Missing content? Let us know