This document has not been cited yet.

1. Amaruzaman, S. ; Rahadian, N.P. ; Leimona, B. Role of intermediaries in the payment for environmental services scheme: Lessons learnt in the Cidanau watershed, Indonesia. 2017 En : Namirembe, S. ; Leimona, B. ; van Noordwijk, M. ; Minang, P. Co-Investment in Ecosystem Services: Global Lessons from Payment and Incentive Schemes. World Agroforestry Centre: Nairobi
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Bakker, K. An Uncooperative Commodity. Privatizing Water in England and Wales. 2004 Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Börner, J. ; Wunder, S. ; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. ; Tito, M.R. ; Pereira, L. ; Nascimento, N. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: scope and equity implications. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1272-1282

4. Brownson, K. ; Guinessey, E. ; Carranza, M. ; Esquivel, M. ; Hesselbach, H. ; Ramirez, L.M. ; Villa, L. Community-based payments for ecosystem services (CB-PES): implications of community involvement for program outcomes. 2019 Ecosyst. Serv.. 39 -

5. Bürkner, P.-C. Brms : an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. 2017 J. Stat. Softw.. 80 -
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Büscher, B. ; Sullivan, S. ; Neves, K. ; Igoe, J. ; Brockington, D. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. 2012 Capital. Nat. Social.. 23 4-30
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Castree, N. Commodifying what nature?. 2003 Prog. Hum. Geogr.. 27 273-297
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Corbera, E. Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. 2012 Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.. 4 612-619
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Corbera, E. ; Kosoy, N. ; Martínez Tuna, M. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. 2007 Glob. Environ. Chang.. 17 365-380
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Daily, G. Introduction: What are ecosystem services?. 1997 En : Daily, G. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press: Washington D. C
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Davis, A. ; Goldman, M.J. Beyond payments for ecosystem services: considerations of trust, livelihoods and tenure security in community-based conservation projects. 2019 Oryx. 53 491-496
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. den Uyl, R.M. ; Driessen, P.P.J. Evaluating governance for sustainable development - insights from experiences in the Dutch fen landscape. 2015 J. Environ. Manag.. 163 186-203
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Derissen, S. ; Latacz-Lohmann, U. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. 2013 Ecosyst. Serv.. 6 12-15

14. Dougill, A.J. ; Stringer, L.C. ; Leventon, J. ; Riddell, M. ; Rueff, H. ; Spracklen, D.V. ; Butt, E. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands. 2012 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.. 367 3178-3190
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Engel, S. ; Pagiola, S. ; Wunder, S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 65 663-674

16. Ezzine-de-Blas, D. ; Wunder, S. ; Ruiz-Pérez, M. ; Del Pilar Moreno-Sanchez, R. Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. 2016 PLoS One. 11 -

17. Farley, J. ; Aquino, A. ; Daniels, A. ; Moulaert, A. ; Lee, D. ; Krause, A. Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 2075-2084

18. Farley, J. ; Costanza, R. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 2060-2068

19. Fletcher, R. ; Breitling, J. Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica. 2012 Geoforum. 43 402-411
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Fletcher, R. ; Büscher, B. The PES conceit: revisiting the relationship between payments for environmental services and neoliberal conservation. 2017 Ecol. Econ.. 132 224-231

21. Frost, P.G.H. ; Bond, I. The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 65 776-787

22. García-Amado, L.R. ; Pérez, M.R. ; Escutia, F.R. ; García, S.B. ; Mejía, E.C. Efficiency of payments for environmental services: equity and additionality in a case study from a biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. 2011 Ecol. Econ.. 70 2361-2368

23. Gatiso, T.T. ; Vollan, B. ; Vimal, R. ; Kühl, H.S. If possible, incentivize individuals not groups: evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments on Forest conservation in rural Uganda. 2018 Conserv. Lett.. 11 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Gómez-Baggethun, E. ; Ruiz-Pérez, M. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. 2011 Prog. Phys. Geogr.. 35 613-628
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Hahn, T. ; McDermott, C. ; Ituarte-Lima, C. ; Schultz, M. ; Green, T. ; Tuvendal, M. Purposes and degrees of commodification: economic instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services need not rely on markets or monetary valuation. 2015 Ecosyst. Serv.. 16 74-82

26. Hayes, T. ; Grillos, T. ; Bremer, L.L. ; Murtinho, F. ; Shapiro, E. Collective PES: more than the sum of individual incentives. 2019 Environ. Sci. Pol.. 102 1-8
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Hayes, T. ; Murtinho, F. ; Wolff, H. The impact of payments for environmental services on communal lands: an analysis of the factors driving household land-use behavior in Ecuador. 2017 World Dev.. 93 427-446

28. Ingram, J.C. ; Wilkie, D. ; Clements, T. ; McNab, R.B. ; Nelson, F. ; Baur, E.H. ; Sachedina, H.T. ; Peterson, D.D. ; Foley, C.A.H. Evidence of payments for ecosystem services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. 2014 Ecosyst. Serv.. 7 10-21

29. Kaczan, D. ; Pfaff, A. ; Rodriguez, L. ; Shapiro-Garza, E. Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services. 2017 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 86 48-67

30. Kaiser, J. ; Haase, D. ; Krueger, T. Collective payments for ecosystem services: a counterpart of commodification and privatization trends in nature conservation?. 2023 Ecol. Soc.. 28 13-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Kaiser, J. ; Haase, D. ; Krueger, T. Payments for ecosystem services: a review of definitions, the role of spatial scales, and critique. 2021 Ecol. Soc.. 26 12-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Kallis, G. ; Gómez-Baggethun, E. ; Zografos, C. To value or not to value? That is not the question. 2013 Ecol. Econ.. 94 97-105

33. Kerr, J.M. ; Vardhan, M. ; Jindal, R. Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services. 2014 Int. J. Commons. 8 595-616
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Koh, N.S. ; Hahn, T. ; Boonstra, W.J. How much of a market is involved in a biodiversity offset? A typology of biodiversity offset policies. 2019 J. Environ. Manag.. 232 679-691
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Kosoy, N. ; Corbera, E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1228-1236

36. Lima, L.S. ; Krueger, T. ; García-Marquez, J. Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services. 2017 Ecosyst. Serv.. 27 139-149

37. Matulis, B.S. The narrowing gap between vision and execution: Neoliberalization of PES in Costa Rica. 2013 Geoforum. 44 253-260
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. McAfee, K. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. 2012 Dev. Chang.. 43 105-131

39. McAfee, K. ; Shapiro, E.N. Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. 2010 Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.. 100 579-599
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking. A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. 2020 CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. McElwee, P. ; Nghiem, T. ; Le, H. ; Vu, H. ; Tran, N. Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. 2014 J. Rural. Stud.. 36 423-440
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. McElwee, P.D. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: panacea or problem?. 2012 Geoforum. 43 412-426
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Moher, D. ; Liberati, A. ; Tetzlaff, J. ; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. 2009 PLoS Med.. 6 -

44. Mongeon, P. ; Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of web of science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. 2016 Scientometrics. 106 213-228

45. Muradian, R. Payments for ecosystem services as incentives for collective action. 2013 Soc. Nat. Resour.. 26 1155-1169
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Muradian, R. ; Corbera, E. ; Pascual, U. ; Kosoy, N. ; May, P.H. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1202-1208

47. Narloch, U. ; Drucker, A.G. ; Pascual, U. What role for cooperation in conservation tenders? Paying farmer groups in the high Andes. 2017 Land Use Policy. 63 659-671
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Neilson, J. ; Leimona, B. Payments for ecosystem services and environmental governance in Indonesia. 2013 En : Lyster, R. ; MacKenzie, C. ; McDermott, C. Law, Tropical Forests and Carbon. The Case of REDD+. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Nieratkaa, L. ; Bray, D. ; Mozumder, P. Can payments for environmental services strengthen social capital, encourage distributional equity, and reduce poverty?. 2015 Conserv. Soc.. 13 345-355
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

50. Norgaard, R.B. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1219-1227

51. Obeng, E.A. ; Aguilar, F.X. ; McCann, L.M. Payments for forest ecosystem services: a look at neglected existence values, the free-rider problem and beneficiaries’ willingness to pay. 2018 Int. For. Rev.. 20 206-219
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Osborne, T. Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: a political ecology of common property forest governance. 2015 Geoforum. 67 64-77
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Osborne, T. ; Shapiro-Garza, E. Embedding carbon markets: complicating commodification of ecosystem Services in Mexico’s forests. 2018 Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.. 108 88-105

54. Osborne, T.M. Carbon forestry and agrarian change: access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. 2011 J. Peasant Stud.. 38 859-883
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. 1957 Beacon Press: Boston, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Rights and Resource Initiative, Who Owns the World’s Land?. 2015 Rights and Resource Initiative: Washington D. C., USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Rodríguez-Robayo, K.J. ; Ávila-Foucat, V.S. ; Maldonado, J.H. Indigenous communities’ perception regarding payments for environmental services programme in Oaxaca Mexico. 2016 Ecosyst. Serv.. 17 163-171

58. Rodríguez-Robayo, K.J. ; Merino-Pérez, L. Preserve and produce: experience in implementing payments for environmental services in two indigenous communities in the northern and southern ranges of Oaxaca, Mexico. 2018 J. Sustain. For.. 37 504-524
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Salzman, J. ; Bennett, G. ; Carroll, N. ; Goldstein, A. ; Jenkins, M. The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services. 2018 Nat. Sustain.. 1 136-144

60. Sattler, C. ; Matzdorf, B. PES in a nutshell: from definitions and origins to PES in practice - approaches, design process and innovative aspects. 2013 Ecosyst. Serv.. 6 2-11

61. Sattler, C. ; Trampnau, S. ; Schomers, S. ; Meyer, C. ; Matzdorf, B. Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: how do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success?. 2013 Ecosyst. Serv.. 6 31-45

62. Scales, I.R. Paying for nature: what every conservationist should know about political economy. 2014 Oryx. 49 226-231
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Schlager, E. ; Ostrom, E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. 1992 Land Econ.. 68 249-262

64. Schomers, S. ; Matzdorf, B. Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. 2013 Ecosyst. Serv.. 6 16-30

65. Sierra, R. ; Russman, E. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a forest conservation assessment in the Osa peninsula, Costa Rica. 2006 Ecol. Econ.. 59 131-141

66. Sikor, T. ; He, J. ; Lestrelin, G. Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis revisited. 2017 World Dev.. 93 337-349

67. Sommerville, M. ; Jones, J.P.G. ; Rahajaharison, M. ; Milner-Gulland, E.J. The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based payment for environmental services interventions: a case study from Menabe, Madagascar. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1262-1271

68. Sommerville, M. ; Milner-Gulland, E.J. ; Rahajaharison, M. ; Jones, J.P.G. Impact of a community-based payment for environmental services intervention on forest use in Menabe, Madagascar. 2010 Conserv. Biol.. 24 1488-1498
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Tacconi, L. Redefining payments for environmental services. 2012 Ecol. Econ.. 73 29-36

70. Vatn, A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1245-1252

71. Vatn, A. ; Kajembe, G. ; Mosi, E. ; Nantongo, M. ; Silayo, D.S. What does it take to institute REDD+? An analysis of the Kilosa REDD+ pilot, Tanzania. 2017 Forest Pol. Econ.. 83 1-9

72. Vehtari, A. ; Gelman, A. ; Gabry, J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. 2017 Stat. Comput.. 27 1413-1432
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

73. Wily, L.A. Collective land ownership in the 21st century: overview of global trends. 2018 Land. 7 -

74. Wunder, S. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. 2008 Environ. Dev. Econ.. 13 279-297

75. Wunder, S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. 2015 Ecol. Econ.. 117 234-243

76. Wunder, S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation: essays. 2007 Conserv. Biol.. 21 48-58
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
77. Wunder, S. When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. 2013 Conserv. Lett.. 6 230-237
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

78. Wunder, S. ; Brouwer, R. ; Engel, S. ; Ezzine-de-Blas, D. ; Muradian, R. ; Pascual, U. ; Pinto, R. From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. 2018 Nat. Sustain.. 1 145-150

79. Wunder, S. ; Engel, S. ; Pagiola, S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 65 834-852

1. The increasing opportunity cost of sequestering CO2 in the Brazilian Amazon forest. (2022). Perrin, Richard ; Fulginiti, Lilyan ; Braga, Marcelo ; Silva, Felipe Figueiredo.
   In: Empirical Economics.
   RePEc:spr:empeco:v:62:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s00181-021-02031-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Impacts of conservation incentives in protected areas: The case of Bolsa Floresta, Brazil. (2022). Wunder, Sven ; Pagiola, Stefano ; Cisneros, Elías ; Borner, Jan.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:111:y:2022:i:c:s0095069621001200.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. REDD+ policy implementation and institutional interplay: Evidence from three pilot projects in Cameroon. (2022). di Gregorio, Monica ; Paavola, Jouni ; Gakou-Kakeu, Josiane ; Sonwa, Denis Jean.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:135:y:2022:i:c:s1389934121002483.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Sustainability of agricultural production following deforestation in the tropics: Evidence on the value of newly-deforested, long-deforested and forested land in the Brazilian Amazon. (2021). Mullan, Katrina ; Caviglia-Harris, Jill L ; Sills, Erin O.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:108:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003835.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. A real options framework for reducing emissions from deforestation: Reconciling short-term incentives with long-term benefits from conservation and agricultural intensification. (2021). Golub, Alexander ; Lubowski, Ruben ; Leslie, Gabriela ; Herrera, Diego ; Pietracci, Breno.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:49:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621000334.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Poverty reduction saves forests sustainably: Lessons for deforestation policies. (2020). Miyamoto, Motoe.
   In: World Development.
   RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x1930395x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Use and misuse of the net present value in environmental studies. (2020). Knoke, Thomas ; Gosling, Elizabeth ; Paul, Carola.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:174:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919311103.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Using referenda to improve targeting and decrease costs of conditional cash transfers. (2019). Sims, Katharine ; Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M ; Phaneuf, Daniel J.
   In: Journal of Public Economics.
   RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:176:y:2019:i:c:p:179-194.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Perceptions of integrated crop-livestock systems for sustainable intensification in the Brazilian Amazon. (2019). Garrett, Rachael ; Ferreira, Joao ; Cortner, O ; Niles, M T ; Reis, J ; Gil, J ; Valentim, J F.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:841-853.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnams payments for Forest Environmental Services Program. (2019). Pham, Thuy Thu ; Loft, Lasse ; Haas, Johannes Christian.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:160:y:2019:i:c:p:205-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Increasing Conservation Efficiency While Maintaining Distributive Goals With the Payment for Environmental Services. (2019). Grafton, R. Quentin ; Chu, Long ; Keenan, Rodney.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:156:y:2019:i:c:p:202-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Opportunity costs of conserving a dry tropical forest under REDD+: The case of the spiny dry forest in southwestern Madagascar. (2018). Neudert, Regina ; Kohl, Michael ; Prill, Laura ; Olschofsky, Konstantin ; Watzold, Frank ; Kubler, Daniel.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:102-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Impacts of REDD+ payments on a coupled human-natural system in Amazonia. (2018). Grogan, Kelly A ; Caviglia-Harris, Jill L ; Putz, Francis E ; Sills, Erin O ; Roberts, Dar A ; Swisher, Marilyn E.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pa:p:68-76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Improved spatial model for Amazonian deforestation: An empirical assessment and spatial bias analysis. (2018). de Souza, Rodrigo Antonio ; de Marco, Paulo.
    In: Ecological Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:387:y:2018:i:c:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Economic Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services on Livelihoods of Agro-extractivist Communities in the Brazilian Amazon. (2018). Feltran-Barbieri, Rafael ; Newton, Peter ; Hawes, Joseph E ; Alves-Pinto, Helena Nery ; Peres, Carlos A.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:378-388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Getting more carbon bang for your buck in Acre State, Brazil. (2017). Taschini, Luca ; Palmer, Charles ; Laing, Timothy.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:81915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Comparison of Direct Transfers for Human Capital Development and Environmental Conservation. (2017). Ma, Zhao ; Godoy, Ricardo ; Zanotti, Laura ; Bauchet, Jonathan ; Steele, Diana ; Radel, Claudia.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:99:y:2017:i:c:p:498-517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Comparing tools to predict REDD+ conservation costs to Amazon smallholders. (2017). Wunder, Sven ; Thorsen, Bo ; Kim-Bakkegaard, Riyong ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Jellesmark, BO.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:49:y:2017:i:c:p:48-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Policy for pro-poor distribution of REDD+ benefits in Mexico: How the legal and technical challenges are being addressed. (2017). Skutsch, Margaret ; Carrillo, Juan Carlos ; Torres, Arturo Balderas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:75:y:2017:i:c:p:58-66.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Getting more ‘carbon bang’ for your ‘buck’ in Acre State, Brazil. (2017). Taschini, Luca ; Palmer, Charles ; Laing, Timothy.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:142:y:2017:i:c:p:214-227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. How Funding Source Influences the Form of REDD+ Initiatives: The Case of Market Versus Public Funds in Brazil. (2017). Paulino, Sonia Regina ; Salles, Guilherme Piffer ; Paiva, Delhi Teresa.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:139:y:2017:i:c:p:91-101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Getting more ‘carbon bang’ for your ‘buck’ in Acre State, Brazil. (2016). Taschini, Luca ; Palmer, Charles ; Laing, Timothy.
    In: GRI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Assessing preconditions for implementing a Payment for Environmental Services initiative in Cotriguaçu (Mato Grosso, Brazil). (2016). Guerra, Raissa.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pa:p:31-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. (2016). Singh, Simron J ; Grima, Nelson ; Ringhofer, Lisa ; Smetschka, Barbara.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:17:y:2016:i:c:p:24-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The implementation costs of forest conservation policies in Brazil. (2016). Wunder, Sven ; Borner, Jan ; Fogliano, Felipe Arias ; Nunes, Carlos Alberto.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:209-220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Tradeoffs between forests and farming in the Legal Amazon Region of Brazil. (2016). Perrin, Richard ; Fulginiti, Lilyan ; Silva, Felipe.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:saea16:230040.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Conservation vs. equity: Can payments for environmental services achieve both?. (2015). Wollni, Meike ; Vorlaufer, Miriam ; Ibanez, Marcela ; Juanda, Bambang.
    In: EFForTS Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:crc990:18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Mixing Carrots and Sticks to Conserve Forests in the Brazilian Amazon: A Spatial Probabilistic Modeling Approach. (2015). Wunder, Sven ; Borner, Jan ; Marinho, Eduardo.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0116846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Paying smallholders not to cut down the Amazon forest: Impact evaluation of a REDD+ pilot project. (2015). Subervie, Julie ; Cromberg, Marina ; Simonet, Gabriela ; Ezzine-De, Driss ; Duchelle, Amy.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lam:wpaper:15-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Domestic and international forest regime nexus in Cameroon: An assessment of the effectiveness of REDD+ policy design strategy in the context of the climate change regime. (2015). Mbatu, Richard S..
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:46-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Forest certification and legality initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons for effective and equitable forest governance. (2015). Pacheco, Pablo ; Irland, Lloyd C. ; McDermott, Constance L..
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:134-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services (CRES) and efficient design of contracts in developing countries. Behavioral insights from a natural field experiment. (2015). Ibanez, Lisette ; Grolleau, Gilles ; Clot, Sophie ; Meral, Philippe ; Andriamahefazafy, Fano.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:113:y:2015:i:c:p:85-96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Niche Markets for Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Preference and Scale Heterogeneity Effects on Nepalese Consumers’ WTP for Finger Millet Products.. (2014). Pallante, Giacomo ; Drucker, Adam .
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:1414.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Payments for Ecosystem Services: Can we kill two birds with one stone? Insights from a Natural Field Experiment in Madagascar. (2014). Ibanez, Lisette ; Grolleau, Gilles ; Clot, Sophie ; Meral, Philippe ; Andriamahefazafy, Fano.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lam:wpaper:14-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Linking Forest Tenure Reform, Environmental Compliance, and Incentives: Lessons from REDD+ Initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon. (2014). Wunder, Sven ; Gebara, Maria Fernanda ; Borner, Jan ; Selaya, Galia ; Sunderlin, William D. ; Sills, Erin ; Melo, Tadeu ; Larson, Anne ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Bauch, Simone ; Guerra, Raissa ; May, Peter ; Cronkleton, Peter ; Cromberg, Marina.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:55:y:2014:i:c:p:53-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Unveiling information on opportunity costs in REDD: Who obtains the surplus when policy objectives differ?. (2014). Thorsen, Bo ; Palmer, Charles ; Delacote, Philippe ; Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:36:y:2014:i:2:p:508-527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Proximate and underlying causes of forest cover change in Peninsular Malaysia. (2014). Zakaria, Noor Aini ; Aini, Zakaria Noor ; Michinaka, Tetsuya ; Miyamoto, Motoe ; Parid, Mamat Mohd .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:18-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework. (2014). Rudd, Murray ; Raffaelli, David G ; Hejnowicz, Adam P.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:9:y:2014:i:c:p:83-97.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Ecosystem protection and poverty alleviation in the tropics: Perspective from a historical evolution of policy-making in the Brazilian Amazon. (2014). Young, Carlos Eduardo ; Meir, Patrick ; Pinho, Patricia Fernanda ; Ometto, Jean P ; Patenaude, Genevieve ; Frickmann, Carlos Eduardo ; Coelho, Andrea ; Toledo, Peter M.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:8:y:2014:i:c:p:97-109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for ‘win–win’?. (2014). Bremer, Leah L ; Farley, Kathleen A ; Romero, Jos ; Lopez-Carr, David.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:8:y:2014:i:c:p:148-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. The use of species distribution models to predict the spatial distribution of deforestation in the western Brazilian Amazon. (2014). de Souza, Rodrigo Antonio ; de Marco, Paulo.
    In: Ecological Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:291:y:2014:i:c:p:250-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Pasture conversion and competitive cattle rents in the Amazon. (2014). Kaufmann, Robert ; Nomack, Mallory ; Sullivan, Kerry ; Womack, Jesse Y. ; Bauer, Dana Marie ; Soares-Filho, Britaldo S. ; Gopal, Sucharita.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:97:y:2014:i:c:p:182-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. How much is the Amazon worth ? the state of knowledge concerning the value of preserving amazon rainforests. (2013). Strand, Jon ; May, Peter H. ; Soares-Filho, Britaldo Silveira.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6668.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. A constraint satisfaction method applied to the problem of controlling the CO2 emission in the Legal Brazilian Amazon. (2013). Yoneyama, Takashi ; Gherardi, Douglas Francisco Marcolino, ; Caetano, Marco Antonio Leonel, .
    In: Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.
    RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:392:y:2013:i:21:p:5322-5329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. (2013). Schomers, Sarah ; Matzdorf, Bettina.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:6:y:2013:i:c:p:16-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Assessing sustainable forest management under REDD+: A community-based labour perspective. (2013). Cattaneo, Andrea ; Rist, Stephan ; Bottazzi, Patrick ; Rocha, David Crespo .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:94-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Supplementing REDD+ with Biodiversity Payments: The Paradox of Paying for Multiple Ecosystem Services - Working Paper 347. (2013). Busch, Jonah.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cgd:wpaper:347.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. (2011). Garca, Sara Barrasa ; Prez, Manuel Ruiz ; Garca-Amado, Luis Rico ; Escutia, Felipe Reyes ; Meja, Elsa Contreras .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:12:p:2361-2368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia. (2010). Clements, Tom ; Tan, Setha ; Nielsen, Karen ; Milner-Gulland, E. J. ; John, Ashish .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:6:p:1283-1291.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. (2010). Pascual, Unai ; Muradian, Roldan ; May, Peter H. ; Kosoy, Nicolas ; Corbera, Esteve.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:6:p:1202-1208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-05 17:05:12 || Missing content? Let us know